Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 45 of 45 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 12:33 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:33:59 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 12:33 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Rev. Norle Enturbulata, COD" <not-earthli...@nor-hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:473ce865$1@news2.lightlink.com...

You wouldn't call the flat out lies about me and others, written by OSA and
posted "Crap"? What would you call it? Just curious.

No, I don't deny anything----however, I do say your assuming my liking JohnT
is this description I don't believe to be true.
You can.....and I can't........we both have that right. The key difference
is *I* had a good time last night, and you didn't (at that show). All the
rest is theory.

I could say the same about you: You immediately Associated your bad
experience with ALL of JT's movies, and that *could* be labeled as you say:
" behavior can have after-effects in

> ways one could never anticipate".

See how easy it is to "analyze" others? (A joke, sort of)

>> That's too bad, and one reason the media does interview me: As they've
>> told me: "We can get *both* sides from you. You're not someone where
>> EVERYTHING is all bad in Scientology" and I'm not. This is one of those
>> things. Sorry you missed it.

> Well, you've made the point that you're a big Travolta fan, exclusive of
> your activities in the Scientology cult.  This is correct?

I wouldn't say I'm a "big Travolta fan"---I'd say I enjoyed his movie, and
many of his I like (Pulp Fiction is a favorite)
and yes, I can differentiate an artist from the cult, if that's your
question. I also like JT--he's a good guy, nice,
fun, and always has been--way before Scientology.

I also believe that communicating with people, any kind of person, is FAR
more successful than trying to impose your ideas, no matter how "correct" on
them. I learned that the hard way, talking to critics while "in"--and
totally unable to hear any of them.
Finally *one* day, a young man came up to me and kept asking me, in a VERY
nice way, and truly curious:
"But IF you're Free: Why can't you read *a* book?"

I couldn't stop thinking about that. I'd already been in a long waking up
process for about 10 years----but that began the beginning of the cracking
of my Scio/Truman show, towards the end.

>>> Defining the non-existent development curve: actors especially show
>>> this, in that their development in everything not involved with
>>> Scientology absolutely halts after a time.  If JT didn't have a
>>> publicity group and an agent, would anyone other than Tarantino have
>>> bothered?

>> Well, that's your take. I don't think Scientology had much to do with his
>> career at all, and that's what I said from the beginning. This is about
>> John---and I *feel* he arrived with the skills he still has..... as I saw
>> them! He's done well, whether you want to acknowledge it, or not.

> He was 'in' from the beginning of his non-dancing career, and was trying
> to get everyone on the "Welcome Back Kotter" show to join the cult as
> well.

Did you work with him? Well, that IS part of a cult: Recruitment---so sure,
he was. When you first find Scientology, esp. back then, it was (we all
thought)
The best. Hell, it took me 30 y e a r s ....getting up to OT 7 (and on that
for 7 years) AND being part of the Top Secret OSA Int Internet gang to
FINALLY SEE what goes down in Scientology, for real. It's NOT pretty---but
he'll never see it, or I never say never, so it's doubtful he will. I
hope---I really hope--he does.

> The cult presents him as 'doing well', his PR machine does too.  But of
> course with Hollywood folk, what you see is not what you get.  Let's hope
> he wakes up one of these days and develops a spine enough to call a cult a
> cult publicly.  Or just wakes up and blows the cult like you did.  Either
> way I can easily predict his acting will improve if he's capable, once he
> leaves the mind-control process he presently shills for as The Answer.

Well, I think we can all predict ALL of the people "In" the cult of
Scientology will do much better, once they finally get out of that damned
solid, yuckie, "you_must_do_what_***WE*** say" totalitarian system.

:) LOL>>>>>>>>>Well, there ya go. I never saw "Pink Flamingos" But it sounds
like a good one, eh?

Take care........

Tory/Magoo~~


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 12:42 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:42:38 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 12:42 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Skipper" <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote in message

news:151120071824353917%skipspamless@charter.not...

A lot of it for me was, too. Did you see Amanda died recently? She was great
in the old days----I loved hearing her sing.

> The only person who knows more about what went on with the celebrities
> and Yvonne is Spanky Taylor, and I know things she doesn't know. I
> don't know if you were around CC with its separate course room for
> "celebs" and "regular public."

Yup-------and I saw their new one, in 2000, with the new, private parking
lot for the celebs, their own entrance to CC, so no one has to even see
them, AND their private courseroom. Nice set up for mind control, eh?

People like Travolta were CONSTANTLY

> kept from the goings-on of the evils of $cientology.

This I know, completely.

 If you have such

> fondness for him, take an opportunity like that to tell him - Hey John,
> did you know the real story about the death of Lisa McPherson? Did
> anyone ever tell you about suicides like Philip Gale, Megan Shields
> daughter? Did you ever bother to try to check any of it out, or did you
> just let yourself get "dead-agented"?

Well, in the two seconds I had to say, "hi"---I knew that wasn't going to
happen, but it's my hope some of his outside
"Friends" get him the info. You and I both know the other side of JT, and
that's a VERY good thang, for many reasons. :)

There's hope....especially with the Net--Scientology has lost ALL Hold for
staff, public, AND celebrities, really.

HAHAHAHAHA! OSA:::: You created your enemies,
and they're only growing daily, thanks to your very actions.
Keep up the **great**work! :)

Best to all,

Tory/Magoo~~


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skipper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 1:57 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Skipper <skipspaml...@charter.not>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:57:17 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 1:57 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
In article <v5a%i.171$_X2...@newsfe06.lga>, Magoo <mago...@charter.net>
wrote:

I did, but she like my friend Manu Topou simply got in and couldn't get
out. They built their entire life around their $cientology friends and
couldn't walk away. So did I, but I walked from them all, and later
found that some felt the same way, but couldn't break away. The only
nightmares I've had, for years, was about going back to my old
$cientology hangouts, telling people how well I was doing, trying to
show them they could just leave if they want, and they just smile sadly
at me and go about their business like zombies.

[snip]

> There's hope....especially with the Net--Scientology has lost ALL Hold for
> staff, public, AND celebrities, really.

One would hope, but I think the reality isn't so easy. First of all,
most of them are actors, most with lousy educations and they're not
very bright beyond working a room and delivering lines. (Yeah, I know,
Travolta flies jets, la de da.) Most of them aren't that talented.

They herd together like sheep before a storm, smugly bleating at each
other that they're bravely saving the universe and becoming gods and
goddesses. Very sad group delusion, but the price of ego run amok is
always oblivion.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 2:15 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:15:05 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 2:15 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Skipper" <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote in message

news:151120072257178395%skipspamless@charter.not...

Good points, and why I don't have tons of hope for the "Celebrities" in
Scientology, either. You've described them well..........and it's hard
enough to wake up---in fact, it was almost impossible for me to. I just
*happened* to be willing to question things, (as well as be a part of some
super odd stuff, which once I connected the dots, the rest is history) and
when that began, the shit began to FLY.

The celebs, with their TOTALLY insulated worlds, with the inbred
'Scientology audiences" all around the world (although seriously dwindling,
I'm sure DM's pitch of the 8 million helps, even if totally false--and hey,
most of them never saw the *real* Scientology, anyways--so how would they
know?)
Why leave? They ARE the glue that keeps Scientology going....and that is
irritating, but hey, happily most are finding their ways to the Net,
learning about C of S,
and you couldn't 'reg' them with a 10 foot pole.

Glad you're doing well. Understand about the bad dream---
that sucks, always will, but it sure is rewarding when One of them
"blows" ---and many are these days! :)

Did you read Mike Rinder is OUT?

Now that guy would write a book and make a skillion,
If they didn't put him in jail. I guess he'd need to tell ALL
and many who leave aren't willing to do that.

We'll see.............

Happy Holidays, Skipper---

Tory/Magoo~~


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kevin Brady  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 2:39 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Kevin Brady" <gomorr...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:39:18 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 2:39 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
"Skipper" <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote in message

news:151120072257178395%skipspamless@charter.not...

The problem, in my opinion, is the fear.  Fear of loss of Bridge, for those
who still see validity to the "Tech", fear of harassment that they've been
educated will occur (yes, it's well known, when you're a scientologist that
scientologists essentially use guerilla warfare tactics on bigger, slower
and more morality-bound opponents, and when it dawns upon you that you are
about to become one of those opponents, it can require a moment or two of
"clarity", prior to making that decision, due to the inculcation of fear of
what the Church does to their enemies.  And they do have enemies.  They made
them, that's how they know.  And they declared them as such, and announced
to them beforehand that they would use all measures, legal and "extra-legal"
to destroy them utterly.

This doesn't breed goodwill in apostates.  There is no leaving scientology
without a fight, a fight in which most of us lost something dear to us, or
will lose something dear to us, if we're sitting on the fence.   There's no
getting around it, sometimes, and it's specifically incorporated into the
culture of the Church to make people aware of this.  The threat is implied
in the Ethics Conditions.  When you are declared an enemy by the Church, a
scientologist who's considered the meaning of stamping out of existence, per
KSW, the threat is definitely there.

That said?  People, I've been completely out, for ten years.  Earlier than
that I left, but they still had a big part of me, because I was continuously
worried about loss of my family, and because I was unaware of the abuses and
deception that were in store for me, and that had been heaped upon others
targeted as marks or enemies of this mad charlatan's nightmare.  I've
experienced minor and unprovable abuse from the Church, in the form of phone
calls where there was no one talking on the other end for years at bizarre
hours, odd accusations at work-places not born out of any activity or words
from me, and of course, the actual loss of my wife and children.  It's hard
for me to say if it was worth leaving.  I have my own sense of self intact,
and have been able to build a life for myself that I enjoy and that I think
is beneficial to the communities I'm part of.  I'm just being honest,
although I know this may reinforce a fear a fence-sitter may have.  My
experience was, other than imprisonment or death, I think, a worst-case
scenario, largely because I was young, and naive, and because I didn't
really understand my legal rights, grok how far away from me my wife had
gone while I thought she was right there.  Some have walked away intact.  I
was afraid to talk about my doubts and considerations with my spouse, but it
may well have been that she may have shared them.  Had I disclosed them to
her, we might have nipped it in the bud, right there, rather than quietly
believing that the other believed, and so we'd better not risk alienating
each other, when other stresses were already putting us at odds.

For the fence-sitters, I'd say that you should walk away, no matter what the
cost.  Understand that what you are dealing with is an organization which
will take everything from you, sooner or later, and sooner is their agenda.
They will take everything from the ones you love, too.  Not just material
things.  But they will slowly convince you, more and more, that you cannot
be free without them, and your will shall be focused by them to causes that
if you truely observed, you wouldn't support.  This will happen to the ones
you love, too, unless you get out, and take them with you.  It's only a
matter of time.  The longer you are in, the longer you let your fears of
loss govern you, the more you will eventually stand to lose, as they cause
you to further and further compromise your personal integrity in support of
their causes.

I feel terrible that I wasn't able to protect my children from this cult,
and will never stop being devastated about losing the love of my life to
this group, and that I introduced her to it is almost too much to bear.  Do
what you can.  Communication is your best bet, but nothing is guaranteed,
except this:  the longer you expose yourself and your connections to the
Church of Scientology, the more likely you will lose your most cherished
assets to them.  If you walk away, there is a chance your spouse or children
or others in your family will walk with you.

At first, this is what my ex-wife did.  But then I fell in to the trap of
doing my A to E steps while she agreed to fulfill her staff contract, and we
were manipulated into parting for this, to increase the speed of both
getting done faster.  In the end, she was secluded from all communication
from me, and my petitions were either denied, or my records "lost".  These
people do not play fair, and I'm not going to minimize the pain that this
caused me.  I won't paint a rosy scenario that you'll walk away and all will
be fine and dandy.  Some have had that experience, and I marvel at that, and
others have suffered far worse than I have.

I hope to one day be reunited with my children.  I think it will happen.  I
trust my genes, and I know they are smart ...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skipper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 7:43 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Skipper <skipspaml...@charter.not>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:43:28 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 7:43 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
In article <9sb%i.270$_X2...@newsfe06.lga>, Magoo <mago...@charter.net>
wrote:

Happy holidays to you, too, Tory. I did read about Rinder, but I don't
think the public would care about a book from him. Your story is more
interesting, frankly.

I responded to this about John because he's the key card in the house
of cards.

Most of the public across the world now think Tom Cruise is nuts.
That's simply a fact. Andrew Morton's book will be read by enough
people that they'll think a lot more than nuts, they'll be disgusted.

Travolta, however, is not seen with the same disdain because he has
more class and a general disposition to get along with people that
Cruise, if he ever had it, lost along the way and will never recover.

Travolta stated publicly in a printed interview in Rolling Stone in the
80s that he wasn't fond of what the then current management was doing.
There were NO repercussions to him at the time.

If Travolta wised up, he'd realize that no matter what personal
blackmail the cult might cull from his PC folders and leak to the
press, the public wouldn't care. As long as he wasn't a child molester,
the public wouldn't care. The public's very forgiving of things some
people think would ruin careers. Example: Ellen Degeneres "came out"
and it was such a big deal. Now the people that like Ellen could care
less, and it hasn't hurt her career.

Travolta doesn't play male romantic leads any more, anyway. He should
leave $cientology, get some non-$cientology help for his kid who needs
it, and get the giant career boost that leaving $cientology would give
him, to say nothing of the life boost he'd get. He has LOTS of
non-$cientology friends.

Cruise's career is almost over, thanks to $cientology.

$cientology is almost over, thanks to Cruise.

If Travolta left, the celebrity contingent would collapse within a year.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 1:02 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:02:47 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Skipper" <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote in message

news:161120070443286334%skipspamless@charter.not...

I'm with you, 100%!  Well said, on both counts.

I always say on TV:," Thank you to Tom Cruise for SHOWING the world what an
"OT" really looks like".

Scientology sent out their PI's after that, to "See if Tory is libeling Tom
Cruise". HUH? Thanking him for showing what an "OT" looks like is libel? Now
~that's~ an interesting concept, eh?

Anyway, we'll see what happens. Sadly, I think JT is still amongst those
that love their "Friends" too much to leave.
It took me hearing from Andreas, "What kind of friends could those be, if
they're going to LEAVE you because YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND?" (My caps, not
his)....for me to fully realize:
They're only my friends as long as I jump through THEIR HOOPS, THEIR WAY.

The minute I didn't...........they proved to me that was true:
CYA~ They declared me an SP, without even a Comm Ev
or even telling me I was up for a declare-----I never got to even tell *my*
side of it to them, and you've seen the rest.

I figured, Hey! Scientology thinks they own justice....well,
let's just see. And bingo~~~ my internet/out of Scientology life began, and
I've met more wonderful, helpful people than I could ever dream of while
"in".

Hopefully, as I said, ...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
moontaco  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 3:03 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: moontaco <moontac...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
On Nov 16, 7:43 am, Skipper <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote:

Really? No sec check or handling?  I'm surprised to hear that.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skipper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 6:59 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Skipper <skipspaml...@charter.not>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:59:59 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 6:59 pm
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
In article
<ac6accfd-5c24-4065-886c-5e5750bd3...@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,

None that I know of, anyway. I really don't think they can screw with
him much.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Red Mage Moogle  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 7:14 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Red Mage Moogle <zidane_tribal...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:14:19 -0500
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 7:14 pm
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

A theory of mine he's scared of the blackmail aspect.

Or possibly it's because they treat celebrities so lavishly that they
never see the dark side.

But note the word "theory". Meaning it's only plausible, any Scn lurkers...

Everyone else: Thoughts?

--
RMM, servant of Xenu

zidane_tribal_64(at)hotmail(dot)com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skipper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2007, 10:43 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Skipper <skipspaml...@charter.not>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:43:33 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2007 10:43 pm
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
In article
<182e73ef-1277-4dc2-a6e2-ccabdd7d8...@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,

Hey, are you Curt Douglas?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2007, 12:12 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:12:16 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 12:12 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Skipper" <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote in message

news:161120071559598782%skipspamless@charter.not...

They *may* Sec Check him, but if they do, it's with a light touch, as they
are with all the celebs. Certainly, he gets VERY special treatment, and that
we both know began when Celebrity Center began.

I'm sure they pitch in the "you need to be resposible, John" and the "You
could change the world" lines, too. Whatever bites---they'll use.
If they need to drive him around in a yellow corvette, they will. It's what
John Travolta *needs*, he gets.

Tory/Magoo~~

...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2007, 12:17 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:17:16 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 12:17 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Red Mage Moogle" <zidane_tribal...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:473e326c$1@news2.lightlink.com...

Naw............highly doubtful, as he's already "come out" for most of the
community he hangs with. He's not a fearful guy.

> Or possibly it's because they treat celebrities so lavishly that they
> never see the dark side.

Yup......you got *that* one right.

> But note the word "theory". Meaning it's only plausible, any Scn
> lurkers...

> Everyone else: Thoughts?

The red carpet treatment, combined with TOTAL Insulation
from 'the real world' (re Scientology)--- and also any harmful things
Scientology does are either kept from them, or immediatly "Handled". I lived
through a number of those, and I have to say, they *seemed* (At the time) ...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2007, 12:18 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:18:01 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 12:18 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Curt" <crt...@cox.net> wrote in message

news:182e73ef-1277-4dc2-a6e2-ccabdd7d8a26@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

ABSOLUTELY!

T


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2007, 12:18 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:18:29 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 12:18 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Skipper" <skipspaml...@charter.not> wrote in message

news:161120071943337529%skipspamless@charter.not...

LOL....good one, Skipper.

T


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rev. Norle Enturbulata, COD  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2007, 5:09 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Rev. Norle Enturbulata, COD" <not-earthli...@nor-hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:09:53 -0000
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 5:09 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Curt" <crt...@cox.net> wrote in message

news:182e73ef-1277-4dc2-a6e2-ccabdd7d8a26@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

Well, you can thank the combination of the US military and the university
system for the Internet.  If you've been an Apple user from the beginning of
your computified life I suppose you would think that Jobs and Wozniak had a
part in that, too, however mistakenly.

--
http://xenutv.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/panorama-scientology-and-me/
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2535187,00.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9363363/inside_scientology
http://xenu.com-it.net/txt/ildikoe.htm
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.xenutv.com
http://www.scientology-lies.com
http://www.whyaretheydead.net
http://www.scientology-kills.org

Rev. Norle Enturbulata
"Church" of Cartoonism
*
* " You can write that down in your book in great big letters.  The only way
you can control anybody is to lie to them."
*  -- L. Ron Hubbard, "Technique 88"
*
* "...Never discuss Scientology with the critic. Just discuss his or her
crimes, known and unknown. And act completely confident that those crimes
exist...."
* L. Ron Hubbard, "Critics of Scientology", November 5, 1967
*
* "All men shall be my slaves! All women shall succumb to my charms! All
mankind shall grovel at my feet and not know why!"
  - L. Ron Hubbard, "Personal Affirmations"


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 3:45 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:45:07 -0700
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 3:45 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA

"Magoo" <mago...@charter.net> wrote in message

news:mjv%i.89$nt.16@newsfe05.lga...

...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skipper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 10:53 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Skipper <skipSPAMpr...@yahoo.not>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:53:09 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 10:53 am
Subject: Re: John Travolta: LIVE IN LA
In article <tUbHm.6827$fH3.3...@newsfe20.iad>, Magoo

...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google