Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Cruise's dogs

0 views
Skip to first unread message

SuvanEnt

unread,
Oct 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/6/97
to

>Crusie chose pet bulls because they're vicisious, untrustworthy,
>and they'll turn on you, though if he wanted to name a dog after
>Miscaviage, he should have picked a poodle.

Aren't poodles notorious leg-humpers? If so, very fitting.

Dave Bird---St Hippo of Augustine

unread,
Oct 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/6/97
to

In article <19971005202...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,
WESFAGER <wesf...@aol.com> writes:
>On page XIV of his book Naked Instinct: The Unauthorized
>Biography of Sharon Stone, author Frank Sanello states,
>". . . [Tom] Cruise keeps a kennel of human pit bulls, ranging
>from the "Pope of Scientology," David Miscaviage, to flack
>fatale Pat Kingsley. (Kingsley is the "K" in PMK the publicity
>firm that represents both Crusie and Stone.) My question is what
>is Mr. Sanello really saying?

Der? It seems clear enough to me. "Tom Cruise maintains a bunch
of vicious [human] lackeys he can set, like pit-bull terriers,
upon his enemies. These vicious lackeys include Damien Miscarriage,
Pat Kingsley, and so forth."


|~/ |~/
~~|;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;||';-._.-;'^';||_.-;'^'0-|~~
P | Woof Woof, Glug Glug ||____________|| 0 | P
O | Who Drowned the Judge's Dog? | . . . . . . . '----. 0 | O
O | answers on *---|_______________ @__o0 | O
L |{a href="news:alt.religion.scientology"}{/a}_____________|/_______| L
and{a href="http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/clam/lynx/q0.html"}{/a}XemuSP4(:)


0 new messages