Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Photographed by Satellite: Jesus Fucking Christ

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Fredric L. Rice

unread,
Jul 16, 2005, 1:29:07 PM7/16/05
to
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/google_spots_jesus/

An amusing and brief article covering a photograph of sand dunes
which shows a vague outline of a human face -- which could very
well be Charles Manson but which believers in the occult will
almost certainly pretend is Jesus Fucking Christ.

---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.notserver.com/
http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
http://www.rightard.org/ http://www.thedarkwind.org/

Kevin

unread,
Jul 16, 2005, 8:32:18 PM7/16/05
to
In article <11dihi1...@corp.supernews.com>,
FR...@SkepticTank.ORG (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:

> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/google_spots_jesus/


What does this have to do with Scientology?

--

Kevin

Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 12:04:45 AM7/17/05
to
Charles Manson and Helter Skelter reveal another crucial piece of the
Scientology/NWO puzzle.


Same thing. Different name.

Lisa Ruby
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net

Infotroll

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 12:10:44 AM7/17/05
to
"Lisa Ruby" <Commis...@groupmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121573085.8...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Lisa:

This is negotiable.

Charles Manson never quite made it in life as a person so it is not likely
that he actually made it in any capacity as a real Scientologist. There is
always the possiblity, but seeing as how he only has 675 more years to go on
his prison sentence, he might prove to be a good excuse for someone yet.

--
Infotroll
http://mysite.verizon.net/resqbncd/keepingawatchfuleyeonscientology/


Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 12:16:52 AM7/17/05
to
Infotroll wrote:

>Charles Manson never quite made it in life as a person so it is not likely
>that he actually made it in any capacity as a real Scientologist.

Larry,

What Manson accomplished via mind control methods is
definitely "making it" in the eyes of those in the satanic realm.


Lisa Ruby
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net

Infotroll

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 12:19:44 AM7/17/05
to
"Lisa Ruby" <Commis...@groupmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121573812.5...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Lisa:

Mind control?

You are misinformed.

Charles Manson and his "Family" group of followers were all LSD users. They
were out of their minds all the time and never even in them long enough to
give anyone the idea they could be mind controlled.

--
Infotroll
http://mysite.verizon.net/resqbncd/keepingawatchfuleyeonscientology/


Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 12:30:16 AM7/17/05
to
Infotroll wrote:

>Mind control?

>You are misinformed.

Scientology does not want the truth about Manson, Scientology and the
NWO agenda to
get out. It is a piece of the puzzle that has been missing for too
long.

Scientology does their best to keep exiting Scientologists away from
the ONLY one with the power to set them completely free from the mind
control processing they have received as well as the accompanying
demonic torment. His name is The Lord Jesus Christ.

Lisa Ruby
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net

Infotroll

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 1:31:13 AM7/17/05
to
"Lisa Ruby" <Commis...@groupmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121574616.5...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Lisa:

Did you know that Charles Manson was really not too big of a Scientologist?
I mean, he was never quite actually in the Sea Org or Commodore's Messenger
Org or anything!

He did however make his mark on society, but *I* would tend to think that
ANYTHING Charles Manson is associated with could get a bad name, including
Scientology.

--
Infotroll
http://mysite.verizon.net/resqbncd/keepingawatchfuleyeonscientology/


pjsavoie

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 4:54:25 AM7/17/05
to

"Lisa Ruby" <Commis...@groupmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121573812.5...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


Awww, go away, stupid off-topic Christian troll.
You make up these elaborate interpretations of "Bible Prophecy" and then
they find out the Number of the Beast was really 616 rather than 666.
Doesn't that make you think? No, of course not, because NOTHING can make
you think if you have your thoughts handed over to you by a religion.

It's 616! Boo! Go away. Maybe God's really the Devil and the Devil
God after all, and maybe Jesus was really called Larry. If you can't get
your numerical screeds right the first time, you can't be sure of anything.


Kim Palmer

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 6:44:27 AM7/17/05
to

Oh for crying out loud - is there no depth to which you will not
sink in seeking some tenuous thread to hang your bogus conspiracy
theories on?? Get a grip you are sounding loonier and loonier

Kim P

barb

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 9:20:20 AM7/17/05
to
pjsavoie wrote:

Kinda like the Jehovah's Witnesses. Scholars determined that the name of
god was actually Yahweh, not Jehovah. So who the heck are they
witnessing for?

--
--barb
Chaplain,ARSCC

"Imagine a church so dangerous, you must sign a release
form before you can receive its "spiritual assistance."
This assistance might involve holding you against your
will for an indefinite period, isolating you from
friends and family, and denying you access to
appropriate medical care. You will of course be billed
for this treatment - assuming you survive it. If not,
the release form absolves your caretakers of all
responsibility for your suffering and death.

Welcome to the Church of Scientology."

--Dr. Dave Touretzky
Peter Alexander

mail.com

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 1:25:17 PM7/17/05
to
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 06:20:20 -0700, barb <bwa...@cox.net> wrote:

> Kinda like the Jehovah's Witnesses. Scholars determined that
> the name of god was actually Yahweh, not Jehovah. So who the
> heck are they witnessing for?

That is just one of the names of one of the gods in the Hebrew
Testament. "YHWH" and "YY" were used, most commonly "yy-elohim"
("Yahweh of the gods").

The Jehovah's Witnesses wrote their own version of the Bible,
using "Jehovah" for "Yahweh" (YHWH / YY) and "God" for "Gods"
(Elohim). Among a great many other deliberately false
substitutions.

Fredric L. Rice

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 1:51:52 PM7/17/05
to

I fucked your mother.

Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 2:09:54 PM7/17/05
to
There is no depth to which some will sink in their attempts
to manage the posters on ARS.


Lisa Ruby
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net

Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 2:21:28 PM7/17/05
to
Lisa Ruby wrote:

>There is no depth to which some will sink in their attempts
>to manage the posters on ARS.

Whoops, I meant to write, There is no depth to which some will sink in
their attempts
to HANDLE the posters on ARS.

Infotroll

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 2:23:52 PM7/17/05
to
"Lisa Ruby" <Commis...@groupmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121623794.7...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Lisa:

Well at least the good news is that we won't be getting implanted again any
time soon.

(LOL)

--
Infotroll
http://mysite.verizon.net/resqbncd/keepingawatchfuleyeonscientology/


Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 3:04:30 PM7/17/05
to
pjsavoie wrote:

>Maybe God's really the Devil and the Devil
>God after all,

That is a revealing statement because New Agers need people to believe
that the Lord Jesus Christ and Lucifer are the same, but merely appear
to be different:

One of today's most influential New Age authors and lecturers,
David Spangler, teaches on Lucifer and "Christ." In his book,
Reflections on the Christ, Spangler explains that "Christ is the same
force as Lucifer but moving in seemingly the opposite direction" and
that "Christ is the perfect balance to Lucifer."

Quote is from the article:

To The Moriel Message Board Administrator: The Lord Jesus Christ is Not
Lucifer
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/jesus_is_not_lucifer.html

Kevin

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 3:21:07 PM7/17/05
to
In article <11dl78k...@corp.supernews.com>,

FR...@SkepticTank.ORG (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:

> Kevin <barbara...@mentalhospital.net> wrote:
> >In article <11dihi1...@corp.supernews.com>,
> > FR...@SkepticTank.ORG (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/google_spots_jesus/
> >What does this have to do with Scientology?
>
> I fucked your mother.

Gah, you must not have very high standards.
She is like 65.

That says more about you than her.

Sicko.

--

Kevin

Kim Palmer

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 4:10:21 PM7/17/05
to
Lisa Ruby wrote:

> pjsavoie wrote:
>
>
>>Maybe God's really the Devil and the Devil
>>God after all,
>
>
> That is a revealing statement because New Agers need people to believe
> that the Lord Jesus Christ and Lucifer are the same, but merely appear
> to be different:

blah blah - seen any black helicopters lately?? There is NO conspiracy
you are starting sound as loony as schwartz

Kim P

pjsavoie

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 4:14:20 PM7/17/05
to

<desertphile@hot mail.com (Disloyal Officer)> wrote in message
news:42da...@news2.lightlink.com...

> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 06:20:20 -0700, barb <bwa...@cox.net> wrote:

> The Jehovah's Witnesses wrote their own version of the Bible,
> using "Jehovah" for "Yahweh" (YHWH / YY) and "God" for "Gods"
> (Elohim). Among a great many other deliberately false
> substitutions.

The bizarre logic was that centuries ago, somebody from some Christian
faith took the Hebrew letters YHWH and wondered about the missing vowels,
and arbitrarily said it would be the vowels in "Adonai" (another Hebrew word
for God) placed backwards between the letters, making something like
YaiHoWaH. Then this was spelled in German as Jehowah (where the j is
pronounced like a "y" and the w like a "v") and turned into English as
Jehovah as it is sounded in English.
Too much obsession with the "name" of God. But the Jehovah's
Witnesses are covered elsewhere (http://www.freeminds.org)


pjsavoie

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 5:03:59 PM7/17/05
to

"Lisa Ruby" <Commis...@groupmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121624100.4...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

> pjsavoie wrote:
>
>>Maybe God's really the Devil and the Devil
>>God after all,
>
> That is a revealing statement because New Agers need people to believe
> that the Lord Jesus Christ and Lucifer are the same, but merely appear
> to be different:

I did not say they were the SAME. I said YOU could not tell because
you've seen neither. You haven't seen God or Jesus, your leaders haven't
seen him, in fact it would get in in trouble with your religious hierarchy
to claim you have seen God or talked to God. For all you know, your
religious pastors are just Satanists out promoting Satan, just calling it
Jesus. Everyone in your little religion groups lives by "faith," which
means doubt and uncertainty and never being sure, always taking the word of
ignorant shepherds 3,000 years ago with manure on their robes. A little
thought-renewal is needed here, especially since mankind has changed so much
since the sheep-manure days.

New Agers don't require other people to believe anything. I think
they're silly, but to their credit they tend to leave other people alone.
They in turn have not been left alone by your kind; you're a direct
descendent of a crowd of peasants with pitchforks out to "burn the witch."


Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 18, 2005, 1:31:41 AM7/18/05
to
Kim P wrote:

>There is NO conspiracy you are starting sound as loony as schwartz

There is a plan to get people prepared for Hubbard's "civilization
without insanity, without criminals and without war."

The Plan has ominous goals:

"This movement is, of course, intensely anti-Christian and
anti-Semitic. They call their efforts "The Plan" which includes a
"cleansing action" that must take place to remove negative and evil
elements from the world before the New Age of peace can be fully
ushered in."

This cleasnsing action can also be referred to as "clearing the
planet."


See: http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/the_plan_what_is_it.html

Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 18, 2005, 1:34:11 AM7/18/05
to
Fredric L. Rice wrote:

>I fucked your mother.

I am going to check Andreas' xenu.net site and see if your name and
link are still on there. If they are, then I'm going to start asking
some questions.


Lisa Ruby

http://www.libertytothecaptives.net

Message has been deleted

Lisa Ruby

unread,
Jul 18, 2005, 2:13:52 AM7/18/05
to
psjavorie wrote:

>For all you know, your religious pastors are just
>Satanists out promoting Satan, just calling it Jesus.

This happens in the "Christian establishment" all
the time. It is easy for satanists to infiltrate
because Christians do not heed the Bible and judge
a tree by its fruit; rather, they usually judge it by its profession.
This is a recipe for infiltration.

The same thing goes on here at ARS with the
self-professed Scientology critics. Scientology
critics are not going to do their utmost to prevent
the exposure of the REASON Hubbard wanted to create a civilization
without war and where (only) the able
can prosper and only what the Scientology and the UN
determine to be honest beings (authentically human)
can have rights.


Lisa Ruby
htp://libertytothecaptives.net/scientology_nwo_operation.html

Fredric L. Rice

unread,
Jul 18, 2005, 10:39:11 PM7/18/05
to
Kevin <barbara...@mentalhospital.net> wrote:
>In article <11dl78k...@corp.supernews.com>,
> FR...@SkepticTank.ORG (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
>> Kevin <barbara...@mentalhospital.net> wrote:
>> >In article <11dihi1...@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > FR...@SkepticTank.ORG (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
>> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/google_spots_jesus/
>> >What does this have to do with Scientology?
>> I fucked your mother.
>Gah, you must not have very high standards. She is like 65.

I fucked her before you were born, son. }:-}

0 new messages