CONCENTRATION CAMPS!
Sue's New's
the country 'just in case' it becomes necessary to institute martial law
and imprison millions of Americans.
'There are about 600 of these prison sites around the country. They do
not yet contain prisoners.' The camps are 'all fully operational' and
ready to receive prisoners.
These camps are to be operated by FEMA (The Federal Emergercy Management
Agency.) Should martial law need to be implemented in the United
States.
'The camps all have railroad facilites leading to and from the detention
facilities.'
Currently, the largest detention center is located outside Fairbanks,
Alaska, and can hold approximately 2 million people.
The camp in Palmdale is 'masquerading as part of a water facility',
The fences that run for miles around this large facility all point
inward and there is a moat surrounding in the central area'.
'No trespassing' sings are posted every 50 feet to discourage prying
eyes.
This area could easily fit 100,000 people.
A similar site in the San Fernando area is even more ominous, ringed
with barbed wire fences.
'There were newly construeted roads, new gray military-looking buildings
and a landing strip. 'Police care are constantly patrolling the
several-mile perimeter'.
On the grounds were about 100 huge black boxes that look like railroad
cars.
The government will use a natural catastropha or another Y2K-type crisis
that sparks nationwide panic as excuse to institute martial law and
begin filling the camps.
'Once a major disaster occurs, whether it is a real or manufactured
event does not matter, martial law is hurriedly put in place and we are
all in the hands of the government agencies'.
Sue
Rev. Fredric L. Rice
>The government has quietly built hundreds of concertration camps around
>the country 'just in case' it becomes necessary to institute martial law
>and imprison millions of Americans.
<heh> A WebTV user. }:-}
-- Listen to Scientology's insane "International President" nutter
ranting insanely at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice
When scientologists are involved it raises the chances of business
fraud by about 100 fold. -- Human Rights activist Mr. Keith Henson
"Commodore Rimjob" available http://crimjob.tripod.com
Kymus
>The government has quietly built hundreds of concertration camps around
>the country 'just in case' it becomes necessary to institute martial law
>and imprison millions of Americans.
Which it is SOOOOO eager to do because of the tremendous benefit to the economy
this would produce - right? Show me a US administration that is willing to
plan anything that reduces GDP except in the direst emergency and I'll show you
a one term administration with no support in leading political circles before
any coupe from the ruling elite arises.
>'There are about 600 of these prison sites around the country. They do
>not yet contain prisoners.' The camps are 'all fully operational' and
>ready to receive prisoners.
>These camps are to be operated by FEMA (The Federal Emergercy Management
>Agency.) Should martial law need to be implemented in the United
>States.
>'The camps all have railroad facilites leading to and from the detention
>facilities.'
For that matter should hurricanes, floods, earthquakes and other disasters
require massive and sudden relocating of people, we know where to find them,
thanks to FEMA doing its job and having camps set up in advance.
>Currently, the largest detention center is located outside Fairbanks,
>Alaska, and can hold approximately 2 million people.
And Gold houses all the super dooper secret wireless communications for it all
- right?
>The camp in Palmdale is 'masquerading as part of a water facility',
>The fences that run for miles around this large facility all point
>inward and there is a moat surrounding in the central area'.
Uh, sweetie, in the desert people want water to percolate and stay underground
so it can be pumped out by wells. Water in the desert often comes in big
floods which must be impounded and allowed to percolate, thus the moats
enclosing the percolation field. You are describing a settling pond facility,
sweetums, a site dedicated to conserving precious water. No one wants that
water polluted, so the area is fenced off.
>'No trespassing' sings are posted every 50 feet to discourage prying
>eyes.
Lots of luck. Those areas are overflown by millions of passengers each year
and endless private aircraft and it ain't solid wall fencing and it has no
trespassing signs conspicuously posted every 50 feet.
>This area could easily fit 100,000 people.
It had better fit more than that if the Big One hits LA. Palmdale is a prime
evacuation site for metropolitan LA. But frankly I don't think anyone is
stupid enough to relocate hordes of people to a settling pond that is designed
to flood if a big rain comes.
>A similar site in the San Fernando area is even more ominous, ringed
>with barbed wire fences.
Show me something not ringed by barbed wire in San Fernando and I'll show you
future stolen property.
>'There were newly construeted roads, new gray military-looking buildings
>and a landing strip. 'Police care are constantly patrolling the
>several-mile perimeter'.
>On the grounds were about 100 huge black boxes that look like railroad
>cars.
>The government will use a natural catastropha or another Y2K-type crisis
>that sparks nationwide panic as excuse to institute martial law and
>begin filling the camps.
Just because they hate thriving economies, and want to stop all that, right?
And presumably the thousands of other politically connectd people who would
like to gain political capital by criticizing the dictatorship resulting are
just going to sit at home twiddling their thumbs? And supposedly the US
military is simply going to abandon a couple hundred years of unbroken civilian
control because they all just loooove the top dog over the military and don't
want to cut him down to size after he disgraces the entire military tradition
they've been weaned on from the earliest age? And supposedly the 1.5 firearms
per capita in the possession of the US civilian population are simply going to
gather rust all through this?
Maybe someone can throw a revolution or a coupe in the US under the right
circumstances, but they can never never stop the counterrevolution which
arises, seeing the original as example and justification. Sufficiently
disturbed, American democracy becomes pendular. Its history is replete with
examples.
>'Once a major disaster occurs, whether it is a real or manufactured
>event does not matter, martial law is hurriedly put in place and we are
>all in the hands of the government agencies'.
> Sue
Depends on the disaster. If the disaster is large enough they damn well better
declare martial law and let FEMA run what isn't being run by local governments.
// BT all that you can be - in Xenu's Army //
george landry
Funny, I can't seem to find martial law, or a state of emergency in
the Constitution. And the Constitution does not give the President
emergency powers.
An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution is not law. When the
Constitution and an act of Congress are in conflict, the Constitution must
govern the case to which both apply. Congress cannot confer on this court any
original jurisdiction. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited,
and those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten is the reason the
Constitution was written.
-- Marbury vs. Madison
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having
the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An
unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had
never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to
settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow
that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no
power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts
performed under it ....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An
unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.
Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land,
it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are
bound to enforce it.
-- American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Volume 16, Section 177
Kymus
>Funny, I can't seem to find martial law, or a state of emergency in
>the Constitution. And the Constitution does not give the President
>emergency powers.
Oh? When is it that the President may suspend the writ of habeus corpus???
Further,
The President has EXECUTIVE powers. What is an executive power?
Why it is a power exercised by the executive of course!!!
Similarly what is the authority of the US Supreme Court under the constitution?
According to the supreme court, it is the authority the supreme court
interprets the constitution to have conferred on it, in its own opinion.
What is the legislative power? The power to make a law. Upon what authority
does a legislature make laws? There's a law saying they can.
You won't find discussion of comon law trusts in the constitution either, but
they are protected as among the rights of the people as forms of business
operation. The constitution assumes the background of the English common and
statutory law and elaborates upon that.