Monica Pignotti and Bruce Thyer on Fairfax Underground
noauth
http://www.topix.com/forum/county/fairfax-va/TMBLJBPTNFO02442G/p2
More grist for the mill, Monica Pignotti and Bruce Thyer: The Big Booty Conspiracy!
Monica Pignotti
You hurt yourself and your guru's reputation more than you hurt us by
these lies. It shows how low you will sink and how desperate you are
to discredit me, since you are unable to offer any substantive
refutation to the content of my criticism of your guru. Just shows how
pathetic and desperate you are.
Monica Pignotti
You are clearly in violation of the following:
6. Appropriate Conduct
You agree that you are responsible for your own conduct and
communications while using the Service and for any consequences
thereof. You agree to use the Service only to send and receive
messages and material that are legal, proper and related to the
particular Group. By way of example, and not as a limitation, you
agree that when using the Service, you will not:
* defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the
legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;
* post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or
unlawful Content;
and I have reported this.
Gregory Hall
news:129d45f7-cf04-4eb4...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
=================================
[REPLY]
There is one GLARING problem, Monica. Can you guess what that might be?
Probably not so I'll tell you. Are you ready?
I am not violating the Google Groups TOS because I never agreed to such a
thing because I am not using Google Groups to post.
Can I help it if Google Groups chooses to display my posts which are posted
through a real NSP?
How can it be that somebody with a Ph.D. is so clueless?
--
Gregory Hall
Barbara Schwarz
Yes, he is, Monica.
I do not share many of your opinions e.g. about Scientology,
psychology or psychiatry but you are right, he is harassing and
defaming you (and he also harasses and defames me and calls it
"courting" me or something like it) and he is in violation of Google
terms of service and numerous laws.
Barbara Schwarz
Monica Pignotti
wrote:
You bet he is. Thanks for outing him, so now I have his real name.
Gregory Hall
news:787b41f8-4cc8-4a01...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
Yes, he is, Monica.
Barbara Schwarz
=============================================
[REPLY]
Good grief! Why is it women, in particular, are so dreadfully ignorant when
it comes to Usenet. How can I be violating Google Groups TOS when I don't
post using Google Groups? Duh! Can I help it if they are showing my posts
because they choose to pick them up from the network called Usenet?
I have control over Google. They don't control me. If I don't want them to
see and display something I post I can change the headers so they never see
the post in the first place so they can't display it.
--
Gregory Hall
Barbara Schwarz
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are welcome.
Barbara Schwarz
Gregory Hall
Says the prove liar, Barbara Schwarz, who also posted this:
"I am not even remotely flattered by your postings, Greg. I am feeling
mainly insulted.
"But I am indeed not the person who post these postings about you.
"I am indeed fair, despite I know your real name and have seen photos
of you, I do not publish any of that. I tell you in the face what is
upsetting me. Not more, not less."
<07238496-347d-41c6...@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Look it up in Google Groups advanced search if Barbara lies again and claims
she never wrote it.
--
Gregory Hall
Monica Pignotti
> "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
Your posting is appearing in Google Groups so they can get rid of it
so at least it does not show up for anyone going into ARS through
Google Groups, whether you posted from Google Groups or not. That will
at least get it off the search engines and I have reported you to the
other photographic site as well.
Monica Pignotti
Actually, this is getting to the point where it qualifies as
cyberstalking. I just consulted a lawyer who has informed me that
cyberstalking is a crime in the state of Florida and I have your name
and location, which is Florida, Neal Warren. I don't know if I
actually have a case or not, but I will be pursuing this with the
State Attorney General's office in Florida and getting their advice.
Gregory Hall
===========================================
[REPLY]
<LOL>
--
Gregory Hall
Tigger
Oh good grief.....Isn't it time to stop feeding the trolls?
Monica
> Oh good grief.....Isn't it time to stop feeding the trolls?
If he was just a troll, yes, but he has crossed the line from trolling
into cyberstalking.
Monica
> "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
>
> Look it up in Google Groups advanced search if Barbara lies again and claims
> she never wrote it.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall
No, I would say that Barbara Schwartz is spot on accurate about you.
People on ars who disagree over all kinds of other things can agree
about you because it is so obvious what a lying, cyberstalking scumbag
you are, Neal Warren.
Gregory Hall
news:85089569-832c-41ec...@l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
Beats being a crybaby, Monica.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
Says Obama's new Attorney General. Bwaahahahahhahahaha!
A Ph.D. in some sort of oddball psychology or learning disorders and she
thinks she's a lawyer. <lol>
--
Gregory Hall
Monica
> "Monica" <freedom_dign...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
No I do not claim to be a lawyer, but the individual I consulted with
today is, in fact, a lawyer and has advised me to contact the State
Attorney General's office. You, on the other hand, are no lawyer, Neal
Warren although you may soon need to hire one.
Monica
> "Monica" <freedom_dign...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
A woman standing up for her rights against sexist misogynists such as
yourself is not a "crybaby". Not all the name calling of me in the
world will change who and what you are.
Barbara loves Marty
Your weight or alleged looks should not be the subject of any posting,
Monica.
I think you have any right to defend yourself against this kind of
harassment.
He is very cruel to you. If this is the Christian way, well, no thanks
to Christianity.
Issues should be discussed and not physical features of people.
I am tired of him posting about my allegedly big feet too. I just wish
he would get a life and would take a good look at his body and
behavior.
The personality and not a piece of the body but the entire package
makes a person.
Barbara Schwarz
Ted Mayett
<pign...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>You are clearly in violation of the following:
>6. Appropriate Conduct
>
FWIW, I'm starting to wonder what kind of professional you are. You
think of something like the psychiatry profession, constantly
assaulted by scn. Yet they don't have somebody responding to each and
every slur repeatedly on some silly usenet discussion group. Maybe
such conduct would be beneath a professional... it is something to
think about...
How long now, and how often now, will you be posting about that
picture? As though anybody really cares.
--
Ted Mayett
Critical information regarding Scientology
http://www.solitarytrees.net
Monica
<ars.to.tedmay...@XXmmXXspamgourmet.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:28:59 -0800 (PST), Monica Pignotti
>
The psychiatry profession has power that I do not have. I am far from
wealthy and the only way I have to defend myself is to directly refute
the lies and disinformation on the internet. Actually, there have been
individual psychiatrists who have issued point by point rebuttals to
Scientology. There is a recently posted video on YouTube that does
this -- sorry, I don't have the link but a Google search would
probably turn it up. This is not the same situation at all, though,
because Scientology attacked an entire profession, not just one
individual. I am a single individual being maligned and attacked who
has nothing even close to the power and wealth of the psychiatry
profession.
There are no professional rules against responding to and refuting
critics. There is nothing "unprofessional" about doing so. It is left
up to the discretion of the individual.
Monica
Gregory Hall
news:7a51df56-6012-47bc...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> Your weight or alleged looks should not be the subject of any posting,
> Monica.
> I think you have any right to defend yourself against this kind of
> harassment.
But, it's OK for *you* to post that I am a rapist and a registered sex
offender? And start a police investigation because of your false beliefs?
Let's see if I got this straight. You think it's horrible for somebody to
poke fun at somebody else's age, weight or feet but it's fair posting that
somebody is a convicted felon, a rapist and a registered sex offender?
This is not even close to rational thinking, Barbara.
> He is very cruel to you. If this is the Christian way, well, no thanks
> to Christianity.
Is it cruel to attempt to pull a paranoid delusional individual out from the
bottom of a pit of despair where they have set up housekeeping?
> Issues should be discussed and not physical features of people.
Says who? Physical features of people have been discussed from day one and
will always be discussed.
> I am tired of him posting about my allegedly big feet too. I just wish
> he would get a life and would take a good look at his body and
> behavior.
My body and behavior are both as close to perfection as it's possible for
them to be. If you would make fun of my appearance, I would do the sane and
rational thing and either ignore you or laugh at your remarks. It takes a
person with some sort of mental illness to take themselves so seriously that
they actually believe they are a diety whom all others have to bow down and
worship and at the first sign of a disparaging word the individual who had
the nerve to utter it must go immediately to the gallows.
Your attitude and Monica's attitude is a mental illness taught by modern day
liberalism and the Church of Scientology using liberal tenets that Hubbard
embraced.
> The personality and not a piece of the body but the entire package
> makes a person.
True, but a personality that worships a body and will become all paranoid
and delusional if anybody says less than good things about it is exhibiting
some sort of psychotic behavior. A healthy personality does not become
delusional and paranoid when somebody makes fun of the body. A healthy
personality does not give anybody this kind of power over their well-being.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
Poor fellow! But, I guess I would have done the same thing just to get rid
of your stupidity. . .
--
Gregory Hall
Jommy Cross
<freedom...@hotmail.com> wrote in msg
<033d0020-34a1-47c1...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>:
<snip>
>
>There are no professional rules against responding to and refuting
>critics. There is nothing "unprofessional" about doing so. It is left
>up to the discretion of the individual.
I guess there are no professional rules against standing on the corner
yelling and windmilling your arms at the traffic, either. That would be
left up to the discretion of the individual as well, huh?
Ever yours in fandom,
Jommy Cross
---------------------------------------------------
This message brought to you by Radio Free Albemuth:
before you hallucinate
--------------------------------------------------
Ted Mayett
> I am far from
>wealthy and the only way I have to defend myself is to directly refute
>the lies and disinformation on the internet.
To neither deny nor confirm accusations is a valid strategy.
batmanc...@gmail.com
I am also being harassed by Neal Warren, and I see now he has a history of harassment. Your complaint is 11 years old and today, he is the same way. Even though I have told him to duck off and leave me alone , he continues to post about his sexual fantasies. He is delusional and insane.
"Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."
>I am also being harassed by Neal Warren, and I see now he has a history of harassment.
>Your complaint is 11 years old and today, he is the same way. Even though I have told him
>to duck off and leave me alone , he continues to post about his sexual fantasies.
>He is delusional and insane.
are with a duck? OMG! I sure hope you've had sex with a
man at least once, you poor thing.
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregøry
"I went to the wøøds because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the
essential facts of life, and see if I could nøt learn what it had to teach, and
nøt, when I came to die, discover that I had nøt lived." __Henry David Thøreau