"A Congressional Research Service report commissioned by the House
Judiciary Committee says ACORN hasn�t violated any federal regulations
the last five years," Politico reports.
The report also found "that the undercover filmmakers that allegedly
caught employees" of the organization "breaking the law may have
violated state law in their filming operation."
ACORN IS CORRUPTION IN IT'S SMELLIEST.
Your own stench is unbearable, creep.
You like the smell of stinch don't you, you dirty cocksucking Democrat
pervert, child molesting NAMBLA member queer.
The members of NAMBLA pay ACORN for information on where thy can
kidnap young innocent children. ACORN is a bunch of sexual deviats
that masturbate in the closets.
I'm sure if you know the code words you can get any of those women or
men of ACORN that waste time in what they think is work to give head
free to anyone that has the limp dixk of a Democrat.
If you put a hidden camera in the offices of ACORN you'll most likely
see the scum that works there going in and out of closets and bathroom
stalls so the can beat-off, jack-off and masturabte in general. They
are all a bunch or moronic imbeciles trying to get money from the
government so they can buy enough toilet paper to clean they
fornication meses.
And you are a Jewish racist.
Nefesh, seriously, check you meds. You're flipping out. Get back on an
even keel, man.
It would probably take a mallet and thorazene to even come close.
If someone shit in the mouths of these stupid ACORN parasites they'd
ask for flies to go with it.
NefeshBarYohai is a barking dog and never bites.
He's barking mad, that's for sure.
> ACORN
Suck it.
--
Doc Smartass | BAAWA Knight of Troll Medication | aa # 1939
Book reviews: http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Kook Clearinghouse! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Pray for Goppers the way they pray for Obama! Psalm 109!
So, I goes in this bar one night, people, set up at the bar, bartender
comes over takes my order, says to the guy setting next to me,
"Another beer Jackass? The guy nods his head to the affirmative. Well
this happened three or four times, so, finally, I ask this guy sitting
next to me, "Hey, why's does the bartender keep calling you Jackass?
And this guy says, and I swear he sounded just like a donkey braying,
"Heeee hawwwwlways calls me dat." And I says, "Oh.", paused, "So,
what's your real name? He says, "NefeshBarYohai." And I say, "Mind if
I call you, Jackass." He say, "Nope."
So, there ya go, Jackass, see, I remembered you.
L.Roberts
Atheist
It must really piss this fellow off that a bi-partisan House Judiciary
Committee found that ACORN had violated ZERO federal laws. He seems
to have been emotionally invested in some conspriacy theory as to why
McCain lost. LOL! There are a few reasons, but the main reason is
Palin.
Assholes, Cunts, and Ordinary, Retarded, Niggers
AND THEN SHE SHOULD HAVE SAID..IF YOU HAVEN'T ASKED ANYONE ELSE HOW
COME???
Yup.
Didja hear that Tori Amos--yup, the piano-playing singer--has promised to
campaign for the GOP if Caribou Barbie runs in '12?
She says, "If Palin runs again, I'm going to run on a Republican ticket.
What I know about Middle Eastern policy could fit on a thumbnail, but I
still know more than she does. You have to ask, how could a nation nearly
vote in somebody who isn't qualified for the job?"
(not much more at the link, but here it is)
http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/amos-makes-palin-promise_
1126456
...and some yokel at gop12.com's forum misses the point she was making:
[read in "retard" voice]
http://www.gop12.com/2009/12/tori-amos-if-palin-runs-ill-run.html
"What a gain for our Republic! Another no knowing "celebrity" who can't
sing and knows absolutely nothing about the real world outside her
liberal ideological bubble of privilege passing judment about those who
do know and can do! This stupid story is not even worth a post except to
take a shot at Sarah Palin. And this site is supposed to be fair and
unbiased? Baloney!"
bahahahahaaaaa! I love it! Cunningham describes his own candidate while
trying to bash on Tori Amos. Just replace "liberal" with "right-wing."
Goppers are irony-proof, it seems.
> ACORN
SUCK IT.
> You know what ACORN stands for
>
> Assholes, Cunts, and Ordinary, Retarded, Niggers
Well then. Your argument has convinced me.
*pause*
Nah. SUCK IT.
Your Fuehrer killed himself 64 years ago. Follow his exit.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Grand Rapids 3 (December 20)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, December 26 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
> On Dec 24, 4:34�pm, "Dr. Smartass, Troll Veterinarian"
> <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
>> NefeshBarYohai <tach...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:4dc59895-37e1-48da-a8a
> 3-
>> d85a22c16...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > ACORN
>>
>> SUCK IT.
>>
> Y<WHACK>
Don't you talk back to me, you little shit. I didn't give you permission.
> Anybody that is paid by ACORN is a scumball scam artist.
s u c k i t .
> ACORN ARE ORGANIZED CRIMINALS
So's the Catholic Church, the RNC, the DNC, and yermom.
...and you are a definitely delusional kook.
And you are a common liar and a coward.
On 12/24/09 11:25 AM, in article
db1df844-557b-484a...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com,
"NefeshBarYohai" <tac...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> You know what ACORN stands for
>
> Assholes, Cunts, and Ordinary, Retarded, Niggers
Many thanks for demonstrating your intelligence levels
You never see animals going through the absurd and often horrible fooleries
of magic and religion. Only man behaves with such gratuitous folly. It is
the price he has to pay for being intelligent but not, as yet, quite
intelligent enough.
[Aldous Leonard Huxley]
You're not getting much oxygen to what's left of your brain, up there.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
What's the secndo think?
--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?
The second think is using the head after some big fat white woman
hooked up with big black sambo gets done taking a five slab pork rib
shit.
>>> I hear the fisrt think
>> What's the secndo think?
>
> The second think is using the head after some big fat white woman
> hooked up with big black sambo gets done taking a five slab pork rib
> shit.
Not nice to talk about your momma that way.
How would you like a sock in the face imbecile?
>>>>> I hear the fisrt think
>>>> What's the secndo think?
>>> The second think is using the head after some big fat white woman
>>> hooked up with big black sambo gets done taking a five slab pork rib
>>> shit.
>> Not nice to talk about your momma that way.
>
> How would you like a sock in the face imbecile?
Seriously? OK, if you're anywhere in Washington state, give me your
address and I'll meet you there.
It's theory, not magic.
>
> Quantum physics sure looks like magic, yet only the most intelligent
> have tried to figure it out. And when you look at what they really say
> is going on, it is magic.- Hide quoted text -
>
It sure looks like magic to the traditionalists, but to the
spitirually oriented (NOT religious dogmasists), it is a predictable
scientific way of progressing into the world of mataphysics. Of
course,many of the 'traditional' quantum physicist deny this because
of their egotistical nature. A tough time for some, because they may
have to acknowledge the scientific mind is not necessarily at the
leading edge of understanding.
Just think of many of the well known philosophical adages that take on
a deeper reality when quantum is introduced.
BOfL
> Just think of many of the well known philosophical adages that take on
> a deeper reality when quantum is introduced.
Like what?
I've driven quite a few 'atheists' to ad hominem citing how there no
longer is an "objective" view of what is going on in quantum physics
experiments. Which I saw Feynman say.
It all puts the Mormons and other Levantine religionists in neurotic
denial, as well as their favorite opponents, the atheists. too bad they
dont have their own list to rant at each other, and leave more room for
the relatively rational to discuss what passes for real data.
>>> Just think of many of the well known philosophical adages that take on
>>> a deeper reality when quantum is introduced.
>>
>>
>> Like what?
> The objective analysis of cause and effect. There is no 'objective'
> observer of quantum effects.
What does that have to do with the cause and effect analysis?
'Reality is where you are looking from, not what you are looking at',
amongst many others.
Epictetus is a good reference point.
More relevant is how this applies at the most basic level of human
relationships. How each of us tries to create our own reality 'within'
others, such as wives/husbands etc. Expectation in others often
creates resistance to such expectation, creating flash points, and in
many cases, destroying relationships.
As we are becoming more subtle in our effectiveness (triggering
quantum effects), we are able to invade others space, as our ancestors
used to invade lands.
Those who understood this phenomena, predicted accurately, the
breakdown of relationships now happening in the western world. In Aus,
the divorce rate is now above 50%, and yet both parties share the same
dream of expectation.
BOfL
I would not expect someone with a 'sig' such as yours, would be
expected to understand the subtleties Day is referring to.
People 'cause' the effect without recognising the potency of their own
quantum projections. To learn such subtleties is to learn more of your
true identity, and what you are capable of.
BOfL
>>>>> Just think of many of the well known philosophical adages that take on
>>>>> a deeper reality when quantum is introduced.
>>>> Like what?
>>> The objective analysis of cause and effect. There is no 'objective'
>>> observer of quantum effects.
>> What does that have to do with the cause and effect analysis?
>>
>> --
>> If you don't beat your meat
>> You can't have any pudding
>> How can you have any pudding
>> If you don't beat your meat?
>
> I would not expect someone with a 'sig' such as yours, would be
> expected to understand the subtleties Day is referring to.
Where by "subtleties" you mean the bullshit like auras you believe not
only exist but that some "gifted" people can read them and thus are able
to diagnose anything from diseases to the expired milk in their
refrigerators?
> People 'cause' the effect without recognising the potency of their own
> quantum projections. To learn such subtleties is to learn more of your
> true identity, and what you are capable of.
Ah, the "potency of their own quantum projections"... Why didn't you say
so? It all makes coughcoughbullshitcough sense now.
Yes, in quantum physics. What does that have to do with the way things
work in the non-quantum scenario, i.e. real world? Simply throwing
techno-babble like "quantum" around in situations where it's nowhere
near applicable is the first sign of the lunacy of an idea.
Guess work; the ultimate expression of uncertainty theory.
He advised physical exercise and appropriate diet- so useful in so many
other crafts, is also useful in philosophy. More recent data shows how
the trace minerals in wild and 'organic' food are used by
neuro-transmitters when laying down new pathways during learning. It
also shows new neurons are developed in adulthood, not just childhood.
Data also shows how exercise increases the bloodflow, which then washes
toxins out of the brain. Epictetus was correct.
Of course, those who lack the attention span to deal with Epictetus have
impaired mental faculties, yet often never realize. We see the trolls
here all the time indicating how common it is.
No doubt this has something to do with the breakdown of relationships.
Kids raised on sugar cereals, junkfood, and soda, are impaired as adults
and fail to perceive others and relationships clearly, and when
honeymoon hormones kick in, are, as Plotinus said, 'deranged'. Course,
the hormones only last for maybe 5 months, when unrealized expectations
come, as Plotinus said, to the lover's attention, and suddenly that
which seemed so perfect is now so flawed.
Characteristic of neurosis, to fail to deal with the ambiguity of real
paople and instead either idealize or demonize.
There is an economic side to this too; young women now make more money
than young men. I see some now are the sole support of boyfriends. To
some extent, this is childless women with maternal instincts that then
make children of their men. Nobody thot that making more room for women
in the power structures would displace the opportunity for young men.
The ancient history is obscure, but matriarchies created lotsa lesbian
couples with only a few men able to reliably meet the emotional needs of
a mate.
The notion of Aryan invasions needs revision. When drought drove the
Amazons south off the Steppes, they came into alpha male dominated
cultures with masses of the exploited, the whole thing held together by
goon squads. But goon squads couldnt deal with a mass of nomadic Amazon
refuges, and the population saw a chance for new, and hopefully better
management.
More psycho-babble and pseudo-science in a pathetic attempt to somehow
link quantum physics with biology and physiology.
The point is, that cause, such as that which leads to a particular
result, such as sin to damnation, is no longer so reliable. As we move
from classical to quantum, certainty is replaced with ambiguity and
uncertainty. Which challenges the basic cosmology of scripture as well
as its most ardent critics, atheists.
"Let us consider briefly some philosophical implications of quantum
mechanicx. As always, there are two aspects of the problem: one is the
philosophical implications for physics, and the other is the
extrapolation of philosophical matters to other fields. When
philosophical ideas associated with science are dragged into another
field, they are usually completely distorted. Therefore we shall confine
our remarks as much as possible to physics itself.
First of all, the most interesting aspect is the idea of the uncertainty
principle; making an observation affects the phenomenon. ..."
This is the nail in the coffin of atheism. Atheism assumes there is an
OBJECTIVE view of what passes for reality. Quantum physics experiments
show there are only subjective results and views. Levantine scriptures
can not be made congruent with these results either. For, if there were
an omnipotent omniscient god, it all would've quickly resolved back to a
singularity; but it does not because a- there is no such god, and b-
chaos, which we see is not controlled by anything, precludes the
existence of such a god.
>>> People 'cause' the effect without recognising the potency of their own
>>> quantum projections. To learn such subtleties is to learn more of your
>>> true identity, and what you are capable of.
>>
>> Ah, the "potency of their own quantum projections"... Why didn't you
>> say so? It all makes coughcoughbullshitcough sense now.
> Some understand the calculus Feynman cites in his lectures on physics,
> and some dont. There's no arguing with the latter. But if you look at
> his equations, you mite notice, that as the subject turns from classical
> to quantum physics, the equals sign (=) tends to be replaced by relative
> or approximate signs- >,<,~, which may, or may not be paired with an
> equals sign.
>
> The point is, that cause, such as that which leads to a particular
> result, such as sin to damnation, is no longer so reliable. As we move
> from classical to quantum, certainty is replaced with ambiguity and
> uncertainty. Which challenges the basic cosmology of scripture as well
> as its most ardent critics, atheists.
Brilliant!!! Obviously, one can't possibly present a counter-argument to
this rock-solid logic:
- quantum physics describes the uncertainty principle
- therefore, human thought process is subject to it
- therefore, atheism is nonsense
I'd stay home with my hand on the phone at all times if I were you. The
Nobel Prize committee can be dialing as we speak.
>
> "Let us consider briefly some philosophical implications of quantum
> mechanicx. As always, there are two aspects of the problem: one is the
> philosophical implications for physics, and the other is the
> extrapolation of philosophical matters to other fields. When
> philosophical ideas associated with science are dragged into another
> field, they are usually completely distorted. Therefore we shall confine
> our remarks as much as possible to physics itself.
>
> First of all, the most interesting aspect is the idea of the uncertainty
> principle; making an observation affects the phenomenon. ..."
>
> This is the nail in the coffin of atheism. Atheism assumes there is an
> OBJECTIVE view of what passes for reality. Quantum physics experiments
> show there are only subjective results and views. Levantine scriptures
> can not be made congruent with these results either. For, if there were
> an omnipotent omniscient god, it all would've quickly resolved back to a
> singularity; but it does not because a- there is no such god, and b-
> chaos, which we see is not controlled by anything, precludes the
> existence of such a god.
Oh... my.... fucking... god... This last paragraph is so retarded, I
simply don't know where to start laughing. From the obligatory
little-Johnny-discovers-solipsism nonsense, to the continued
techno-babble that obscures the obvious lack of logic, to the multiple
circular arguments, and last, but not least, the fact that you start off
with proclaiming the death of atheism and finish with the conclusion
that there is no god.
You're a riot, dude.