Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Good night's sleep

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Lots42

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 2:01:08 AM11/17/06
to
Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.

Mark Edwards

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 7:00:44 AM11/17/06
to
No cluons were harmed when "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.

Post proofs and gifs or retract.


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

Mark Edwards

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 7:04:17 AM11/17/06
to
No cluons were harmed when "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.

This is what happens when you separate the Nows from the Laters, I a
box of Now & Later candy. Eating all the Laters will throw off your
sleeping schedule. The Nows should have no adverse effects - unless
you want to sleep later.

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 8:10:48 AM11/17/06
to
On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.

We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.

BW

Terri

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 8:25:04 AM11/17/06
to
bar...@bookpro.com wrote in
news:16drl2l39ashbpnv8...@4ax.com:

Personally I find his posts to be excellent participatory
fodder for funni follow-ups especially when one wishes to stay
uninvolved in flamefests and trolling for dollars. Not that this follow-up
qualifies as funni but still, I'm just sayin...

shelly

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 8:27:25 AM11/17/06
to

Yabbut I think he should get points for achieving his goal. All too
often, I try to have a good night's sleep, and I fail miserably.

--
Shelly (Warning: see label for details)
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 12:55:45 PM11/17/06
to

Maybe you could say it to McGonell or Kevin or Otto, whatever it is.
Share the love.

BW

Terri

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 2:22:01 PM11/17/06
to
bar...@bookpro.com wrote in
news:5ptrl29cur9cgq18e...@4ax.com:

> On 17 Nov 2006 13:25:04 GMT, Terri <Te...@micron.net> wrote:
>
>>bar...@bookpro.com wrote in

>>


>>Personally I find his posts to be excellent participatory
>>fodder for funni follow-ups especially when one wishes to stay
>>uninvolved in flamefests and trolling for dollars. Not that this
>>follow-up qualifies as funni but still, I'm just sayin...
>
> Maybe you could say it to McGonell or Kevin or Otto, whatever it is.
> Share the love.

Sure.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 3:21:33 PM11/17/06
to

What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?

welby

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 3:39:44 PM11/17/06
to
On Nov 17, 12:01 am, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
> happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.

What happens on indecent nights?

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 17, 2006, 6:32:20 PM11/17/06
to

But you're Allowed to cry for attention! ALLOWED I tell you!

Dave "just don't be upset if you actually get some" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 18, 2006, 12:13:32 PM11/18/06
to

QUIT PICKIN' ON TERRI! You're jealous of her quilts, aren't ya?

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 18, 2006, 12:16:18 PM11/18/06
to
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:32:20 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:
>>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>>>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>>>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
>>>
>>>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
>>>
>>What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
>>with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
>>Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
>
>But you're Allowed to cry for attention! ALLOWED I tell you!

I SEE YOU, DAVE! YOU EXIST! And I'll also validate your parking.

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 18, 2006, 12:58:16 PM11/18/06
to
Chris McGonnell <smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:32:20 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:
>>But you're Allowed to cry for attention! ALLOWED I tell you!
>
>I SEE YOU, DAVE! YOU EXIST! And I'll also validate your parking.

Is that what us n0t-y0ung peopum call it these days? Fair enough, let me
get my "ticket" to be "stamped"...

Dave

Shepherd

unread,
Nov 18, 2006, 2:06:31 PM11/18/06
to

Shepherd

unread,
Nov 18, 2006, 2:08:33 PM11/18/06
to

Shepherd wrote:
> Chris McGonnell wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:32:20 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:
> > >>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
> > >>>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
> > >>>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
> > >>>
> > >>>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
> > >>>
> > >>What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
> > >>with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
> > >>Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
> > >
> > >But you're Allowed to cry for attention! ALLOWED I tell you!
> >
> > I SEE YOU, DAVE! YOU EXIST! And I'll also validate your parking.

Fragalistic..
"Server encountered an internal error and could not complete my
request", which was
"Will you buy me a new pair of l.a. eyeworks??/??"

Paula

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 2:04:51 AM11/19/06
to
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:


Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
desperate for attention, any attention at all. But trolling can be a
cry for attention, too.

--
Paula
"Anyway, other people are weird, but sometimes they have candy,
so it's best to try to get along with them." Joe Bay

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 8:49:25 AM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:04:51 GMT, Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent>
wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>>
>>>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>>>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
>>>
>>>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
>>>
>>What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
>>with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
>>Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
>
>
>Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
>desperate for attention, any attention at all.

I wasn't talking about his posts as a whole, but instead was talking
only about the coy ones. And I didn't say "desperate," nor "any
attention at all."

>But trolling can be a cry for attention, too.

Well of course it is, Paula, as is posting pics to Flickr and inviting
people to look, or buildng vanity webbages, or simply posting to the
Usernet, trolling or not. Whether any of those actions constitute a
"kinda sad cry for attention" is another matter altogether.

PS: I thought it was Darla's job to snarl at me for being mean to
Chuma and Lots42.

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 10:40:02 AM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:49:25 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

>PS: I thought it was Darla's job to snarl at me for being mean to
>Chuma and Lots42.

I don't think I ever said anything about Chuma. You can be as mean to
Chuma as you like. That hebephrenic grin creeps me out, and I don't
think he really exists anyway.

Darla
Nova Scotia, Canada
--
"I'm still here, you bastards!"
---Papillon

http://www.yougotta.com/DARLA/
--

TMG

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 2:31:04 PM11/19/06
to
Darla Vladschyk wrote:


> That hebephrenic grin creeps me out,..

You may be on to something here. These look a lot like pics we've seen
before.

http://www.hebephrenic.net/gallery/index.php

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 3:06:46 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:40:02 GMT, Darla Vladschyk
<Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:49:25 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>wrote:
>
>>PS: I thought it was Darla's job to snarl at me for being mean to
>>Chuma and Lots42.
>
>I don't think I ever said anything about Chuma.

You know, I think you're right about that.

>You can be as mean to
>Chuma as you like. That hebephrenic grin creeps me out, and I don't
>think he really exists anyway.
>

Stop making me look stuff up at dictionary.com!

("Hebephrenic," however, is a keeper.)

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 3:54:53 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:40:02 GMT, Darla Vladschyk
<Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:49:25 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>wrote:
>
>>PS: I thought it was Darla's job to snarl at me for being mean to
>>Chuma and Lots42.
>
>I don't think I ever said anything about Chuma. You can be as mean to
>Chuma as you like. That hebephrenic grin creeps me out, and I don't
>think he really exists anyway.

So it's not being meen per say that bothers you but being meen to
people who trigger some maternal instinct in you. I have no maternal
instinct--or if I do, it's undernourished and living in a closet under
the stairs (there are no stairs in my house, however).

I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.

Now see, I try to refrain from being mean to Chuma most of the time
because he cries so piteously when someone teases him or is meen to
him. It's like smacking a puppy. Lots42, on the other hand, is
capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
different treatment because he's "handicapped."

BW

Paula

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 6:46:11 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:49:25 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

>>Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is


>>desperate for attention, any attention at all.
>
>I wasn't talking about his posts as a whole, but instead was talking
>only about the coy ones. And I didn't say "desperate," nor "any
>attention at all."

I did. I haven't seen a single post, though I haven't seen many
lately, that doesn't reveal a desperate need for attention. From
girls in bars, from groupies at concerts, from usenet people, from
work people... NTTAWWT, but that's my take on what Chuma is all
about.

Paula

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 6:51:33 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:54:53 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:

>I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
>individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.
>
>Now see, I try to refrain from being mean to Chuma most of the time
>because he cries so piteously when someone teases him or is meen to
>him. It's like smacking a puppy. Lots42, on the other hand, is
>capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
>He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
>reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
>dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
>different treatment because he's "handicapped."

I have individual criteria as well, only Chuma annoys me more than
Lots does overall for various reasons too long to discuss right now.
The short version is the Lots is annoying from time to time, while
Chuma creeps me out from time to time.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 7:24:47 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:46:11 GMT, Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent>
wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:49:25 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>wrote:
>
>>>Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
>>>desperate for attention, any attention at all.
>>
>>I wasn't talking about his posts as a whole, but instead was talking
>>only about the coy ones. And I didn't say "desperate," nor "any
>>attention at all."
>
>I did. I haven't seen a single post, though I haven't seen many
>lately, that doesn't reveal a desperate need for attention. From
>girls in bars, from groupies at concerts, from usenet people, from
>work people... NTTAWWT, but that's my take on what Chuma is all
>about.

Oh. Boy did I read you wrong. I thought you were saying that the whole
of the posts belies the occasional post seeking attention, that such
posts are the exception to the rule. That's why I thought you were
snarling at me the way Darla snarls at me when I'm meen to Lots42.

Can we go back to being meen to them both now?

BTW, I still stand by my assertion that we're all attention-whores on
this bus. Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 8:16:03 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:06:46 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

>Stop making me look stuff up at dictionary.com!


>
>("Hebephrenic," however, is a keeper.)

You're welcome!

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 8:50:15 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:51:33 GMT, Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent>
wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:54:53 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>
>>I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
>>individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.
>>
>>Now see, I try to refrain from being mean to Chuma most of the time
>>because he cries so piteously when someone teases him or is meen to
>>him. It's like smacking a puppy. Lots42, on the other hand, is
>>capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
>>He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
>>reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
>>dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
>>different treatment because he's "handicapped."
>
>I have individual criteria as well, only Chuma annoys me more than
>Lots does overall for various reasons too long to discuss right now.
>The short version is the Lots is annoying from time to time, while
>Chuma creeps me out from time to time.

I mostly ignore Chuma's posts. We have very different interests, and
he doesn't really participate in a conversational way, so there's not
much in his posts for me. Lots, OTOH, ranges from funny to tedious to
pathetic to really, and you never know what you'll get until you read
the posts (except the "Conversations with ..." posts are almost
garonteed to be funny. So him, I'll read.

But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
at mine or yours or anyone else's.

BW

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 8:58:44 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:24:47 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:46:11 GMT, Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:49:25 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
>>>>desperate for attention, any attention at all.
>>>
>>>I wasn't talking about his posts as a whole, but instead was talking
>>>only about the coy ones. And I didn't say "desperate," nor "any
>>>attention at all."
>>
>>I did. I haven't seen a single post, though I haven't seen many
>>lately, that doesn't reveal a desperate need for attention. From
>>girls in bars, from groupies at concerts, from usenet people, from
>>work people... NTTAWWT, but that's my take on what Chuma is all
>>about.
>
>Oh. Boy did I read you wrong.

HAW HAW! I salute Paula for leaving it so open to interpretation. I
*thought* she meant what it turned out she did mean, but it was
deliciously ambiguous, and I was aware that I could have been wrong. I
admire that tremendously.

>I thought you were saying that the whole
>of the posts belies the occasional post seeking attention, that such
>posts are the exception to the rule. That's why I thought you were
>snarling at me the way Darla snarls at me when I'm meen to Lots42.
>
>Can we go back to being meen to them both now?
>
>BTW, I still stand by my assertion that we're all attention-whores on
>this bus.

Not me me me me me me me me me me.

>Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
>nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.

Some of us may just have better communication skillz.

BW

Marc Goodman

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:25:04 PM11/19/06
to

I WILL NOT BE COMPARED TO LIVER!

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:33:15 PM11/19/06
to
bar...@bookpro.com <bar...@bookpro.com> wrote:
>I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
>individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.

DING DING clunk DING!

Oops, I need to get that bell replaced. 'Scuse me.

>Now see, I try to refrain from being mean to Chuma most of the time
>because he cries so piteously when someone teases him or is meen to
>him. It's like smacking a puppy. Lots42, on the other hand, is
>capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
>He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
>reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
>dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
>different treatment because he's "handicapped."

He can write, fairly well, and has his own style; other handicaps don't
show here. I have no clue what color ... his dogs are, for example.

Dave "I sympathize with the headaches, but suffering has been shown to
produce ART in some cases" DeLaney

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:34:13 PM11/19/06
to
bar...@bookpro.com <bar...@bookpro.com> wrote:
>But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
>no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
>us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
>at mine or yours or anyone else's.

You are SO sitting at the Venn Diagram table now.

Dave "be careful where you place the chair, or else it might slide over onto
the Riemannian Manifold table" DeLaney

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:49:03 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:34:13 -0500, d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David
DeLaney) wrote:

>bar...@bookpro.com <bar...@bookpro.com> wrote:
>>But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
>>no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
>>us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
>>at mine or yours or anyone else's.
>
>You are SO sitting at the Venn Diagram table now.
>
>Dave "be careful where you place the chair, or else it might slide over onto
> the Riemannian Manifold table" DeLaney

If I do, I'm taking the Klein bottle with me.

BW

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:49:04 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:54:53 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:

>So it's not being meen per say that bothers you but being meen to

>people who trigger some maternal instinct in you. ...

Probably. Most liberals are like that. It's why we love and protect
cute fuzzie mammals, and step on or shriek at spiders and reptiles,
all the while claiming to be huddling under the "animal lover"
umbrella.

>...It's so patronizing to say that he should be given


>different treatment because he's "handicapped."

I don't think so, but it's okay if you think so.

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:50:46 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:24:47 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

>BTW, I still stand by my assertion that we're all attention-whores on


>this bus. Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
>nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.

Okay THAT made me laugh out loud!

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:53:31 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:34:13 -0500, d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David
DeLaney) wrote:

>bar...@bookpro.com <bar...@bookpro.com> wrote:
>>But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
>>no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
>>us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
>>at mine or yours or anyone else's.
>
>You are SO sitting at the Venn Diagram table now.
>
>Dave "be careful where you place the chair, or else it might slide over onto
> the Riemannian Manifold table" DeLaney


Ask Chuma to pass the klein bottle, would you?

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 9:58:57 PM11/19/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:15 -0500, d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David
DeLaney) wrote:

>... handicaps don't
>show here....

Well, I have a wooden leg and a plastic cooter. Paula's got one
eyeball on a spring, Barbara's boobs are held on with Velcro, and
McGonnell claims to be confined to a pink velvet wing chair with
casters and three forward speeds. Swilson has to spool his dick up
into a Spandex pouch every morning, and Lots42 has intractable
migraines.

I don't know about anyone else.

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 10:07:49 PM11/19/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:58:57 GMT, Darla Vladschyk
<Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:15 -0500, d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David
>DeLaney) wrote:
>
>>... handicaps don't
>>show here....
>
>Well, I have a wooden leg and a plastic cooter. Paula's got one
>eyeball on a spring, Barbara's boobs are held on with Velcro, and
>McGonnell claims to be confined to a pink velvet wing chair with
>casters and three forward speeds. Swilson has to spool his dick up
>into a Spandex pouch every morning, and Lots42 has intractable
>migraines.

We are SOO gonna be able to form a cool new version of the Cockettes.
Or the Village People.

BW

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 10:14:10 PM11/19/06
to

Yay, new meme!

BW

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 12:13:19 AM11/20/06
to
In article <ld00m2pr1mnku0t5e...@4ax.com>,
Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
> >
> >>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
> >>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
> >>
> >>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
> >>
> >What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
> >with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
> >Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
>
>
> Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
> desperate for attention, any attention at all. But trolling can be a
> cry for attention, too.

The word "attention" is inclusive of "negative attention," and being as
how (<-- ANOTHER DARLA TROLL!) Tim responds to negative comments
concerning either himself or his friends with apoplectic outrage, it
would appear that he is not trolling for "any attention at all." I, on
the other hand, truly *am* desperate for any kind of attention, either
negative or positive.

I'll admit to having been disappointed when two posted pieces of music
of mine, as well as a graphic design portfolio, were both met with icy
silence from arkians. True, the media of music and graphic design- and
band photography, for that matter,- are not the provenance of ark;
ARKians wants something textual they can quote, manipulate, deconstruct,
and reconstruct into something fun'ni. But at the same time, ARK is also
a journal where participants share what's been going on in their own
lives, and to this degree our personal projects are fair game, even if
we can't expect a ready-made appreciation society for the products of
our efforts. The thing with Tim Chuma, though, is that he's stuck in
Show-and-Tell mode most of the time, while only a small fraction of the
time is he in participatory mode.

Obversely, I've posted some of my ark things to ncdnb/MySpace, which
occasionally gives me real-world affirmations, although the collision of
worlds can be jarring. One guy at a house party complimented my writing
in the story about the car crash outside my house, and another guy at a
club last Friday recognized me as "Tagutcow" and told me how much he
enjoyed "the piece about the homeless people." (Another side effect of
worlds-collision is that I had to edit out a reference to Temp Agency
Gurl from the former when I added her to my friends list.)

The kerfluffle with Laura on ark- and ensuing private correspondances-
spilled over into real life, where I had vitriolic email exchanges with
two other people, and one of them- the promoter for a d'n'b weekly I go
to- attempted to ban me from the venue (I attended despite the ban,
fully intending to fight him if he attempted to remove me bodily.
Although the man working the door said I wasn't allowed in when I
arrived, I was eventually admitted after being gently scolded in the
parking lot. I like to think the apparent change of heart was because
the promoter realized his hopes of "getting lucky" with Laura by siding
against me were destined to fail.) I've since had to break off
friendships with two other people because of it.

She also shared extremely private entries from my ark history with
people. I have been chastened about sharing details of my life from this
experience, and I feel bound from talking about people in my life for
fear that she will contact these people, attempting to malign me, and
sharing details of my life with them that they have no business knowing.

My birthday party was a sad affair as I could only scrape together a
handful of people, although an innocent, offhanded question- "Whatever
happened to that crazy chick?"- was the best present I could have gotten.

Oh look... I forgot to censor/euphemise her name! Dear me, what a
tragic oversight!

--
robert caponi | I'm the banana boy
MAIL mailto:tagu...@earthlink.net | I'M FIERCE!
DUMB http://www.myspace.com/tagutcow | I'm the banana boy
SMRT http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/ | WOOooOOoooO!

mantinin

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 12:40:02 AM11/20/06
to

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
> In article <ld00m2pr1mnku0t5e...@4ax.com>,
> Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
> > >
> > >>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
> > >>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
> > >>
> > >>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
> > >>
> > >What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
> > >with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
> > >Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
> >
> >
> > Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
> > desperate for attention, any attention at all. But trolling can be a
> > cry for attention, too.
<snip to avoid Darlawrath>

> I'll admit to having been disappointed when two posted pieces of music
> of mine, as well as a graphic design portfolio, were both met with icy
> silence from arkians.


Eh, most of my usenet experience has been this way.I posted, sloppily,
lyrics to "Armageddons Child", the version that begins with "Once a
wheatfield now sandy", and missdplelled a word-which drew the only
comment, the spelling.<shrug>


True, the media of music and graphic design- and
> band photography, for that matter,- are not the provenance of ark;
> ARKians wants something textual they can quote, manipulate, deconstruct,
> and reconstruct into something fun'ni. But at the same time, ARK is also
> a journal where participants

Death Ray Distractor> LEO SGOUROS


>
> Obversely, I've posted some of my ark things to ncdnb/MySpace, which
> occasionally gives me real-world affirmations, although the collision of
> worlds can be jarring.

I have had good experience with real world collision, thoug it was
straight from "you are a drug addled looney" usenet experience to a
"wlecome to the Dpartment of Justice, NSA, CIA, Navy, Air Force, Coast
Guard, Secret Service, Persia Professor" reallity via
academe.Obvioudly, my usenet antics were on my mind so I toned down my
topogrphical observational cross-section.

One guy at a house party complimented my writing
> in the story about the car crash outside my house, and another guy at a
> club last Friday recognized me as "Tagutcow" and told me how much he
> enjoyed "the piece about the homeless people." (Another side effect of
> worlds-collision is that I had to edit out a reference to Temp Agency
> Gurl from the former when I added her to my friends list.)

Sometimes, you just have to tell people-HEY DU...@YOU.COM, its the
internet.It isnt real.And yet a girlfriend of my ex got mercilessly
stalked by someone on myspace-evil is as evil does.


>
> The kerfluffle with Laura on ark- and ensuing private correspondances-
> spilled over into real life, where I had

Ow, the group of kids next to me here at Coffe Cartel just started
making Fyunch(Click) sounds with their mouths.

DEATH RAY DISTRACTOR>
MOTIES!


>
> She also shared extremely private entries from my ark history with
> people. I have been chastened about sharing details of my life from this
> experience, and I feel bound from talking about people in my life for
> fear that she will contact these people, attempting to malign me, and
> sharing details of my life with them that they have no business knowing.
>

Walk into a class dense with National Security folks, and you will damn
well appreciate they know everything-just as long as everything isnt as
bad as the bad fuckers they are trying to catch!Of course, few places
on earth have such a density, and I still count my blessings having
gone through the experience-YMMV


> My birthday party was a sad affair as I could only scrape together a
> handful of people, although an innocent, offhanded question- "Whatever
> happened to that crazy chick?"- was the best present I could have gotten.
>
> Oh look... I forgot to censor/euphemise her name! Dear me, what a
> tragic oversight!
>

Death Ray Distractor>LEO SGOUROS

I dont do clebrating at all for myself, so I do nout mourn.However, I
am ANCIENT, so this, too, shall pass for you.

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:05:28 AM11/20/06
to

bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
> So it's not being meen per say that bothers you but being meen to
> people who trigger some maternal instinct in you.

I prefer to think it's just that I charm the ever loving HELL out of
the ladies. If I had a ripped set of abs, I would be unstoppable.

>I have no maternal
> instinct--or if I do, it's undernourished and living in a closet under
> the stairs (there are no stairs in my house, however).

There are the doggy stairs in my house, which the dog refuses to use.

>
> I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
> individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.

> Lots42, on the other hand, is
> capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
> He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
> reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
> dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
> different treatment because he's "handicapped."
>
> BW

But I am weird.

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:08:04 AM11/20/06
to

bar...@bookpro.com wrote:

> I mostly ignore Chuma's posts. We have very different interests, and
> he doesn't really participate in a conversational way, so there's not
> much in his posts for me. Lots, OTOH, ranges from funny to tedious to
> pathetic to really,

1) Thanks a lot.
2) To really what? To loose latrec?

and you never know what you'll get until you read
> the posts (except the "Conversations with ..." posts are almost
> garonteed to be funny. So him, I'll read.
>
> But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
> no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
> us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
> at mine or yours or anyone else's.
>
> BW

And at LiveJournal, you get user pictures at your cool table! One of
mine is a great shot of a wolfgirl's ass. Yup. Not kidding there.

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:10:30 AM11/20/06
to

David DeLaney wrote:
>> He can write, fairly well, and has his own style; other handicaps don't
> show here. I have no clue what color ... his dogs are, for example.

I dimly recall other people in other forums asking me what my a/s/l is,
I mean saying what I write while wacked out on painkillers has a sublte
difference from my normal crap.

> Dave "I sympathize with the headaches, but suffering has been shown to
> produce ART in some cases" DeLaney

Mostly typos in mine. Those darned keys are so close together.

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:13:04 AM11/20/06
to

Darla Vladschyk wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:54:53 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>
> >So it's not being meen per say that bothers you but being meen to
> >people who trigger some maternal instinct in you. ...
>
> Probably. Most liberals are like that. It's why we love and protect
> cute fuzzie mammals, and step on or shriek at spiders and reptiles,
> all the while claiming to be huddling under the "animal lover"
> umbrella.

Many conservatives are like that too.

People like the cute. That's why the bug Pokemon tend not to get such a
big role on the show. But then we get the highly disturbing imagery of
a canine bouncing across the dirt floor of the Hoenn League arena.

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:15:06 AM11/20/06
to

Darla Vladschyk wrote:
> and Lots42 has intractable
> migraines.

I'm not sure of that word's definition, it made me think migraines
being rolled out on a railing and ball bearing system for the
un-enjoyment of others.

Lots "Also not sure of the definition of 'has', 'and' and 'beer bong' "
42

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:19:56 AM11/20/06
to

mantinin wrote:
> Walk into a class dense with National Security folks, and you will damn
> well appreciate they know everything-just as long as everything isnt as
> bad as the bad fuckers they are trying to catch!

I was reading an ancient Dean Koontz book and couldn't help but think
how easier it would have been to fight the villian if the good guys has
access to Google. A poetry phrase gave them major trouble for crying
out loud!

Still;

"Hello, City University, how may I direct your call?"
"Professor Smith of Classical Lit. please."

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:34:13 AM11/20/06
to

Shall I compare thee to a banana's skin?
Thou art funnier and more intemperate.
Rough trolls do shake the darling posts within
and sanity's lease hath all too short a date.

Dave "so long as men can post or eyes can read / so long lives this, and gives
life to its screed" DeLaney

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:35:44 AM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:58:57 GMT, Darla Vladschyk <Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote:
>d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
>>... handicaps don't show here....
>
>Well, I have a wooden leg and a plastic cooter.

...I suppose that's better than the other way round?

>Paula's got one eyeball on a spring,

<sfx = GIANT DISPOSABLE NAPKIN>sproing!</sfx>

>Barbara's boobs are held on with Velcro, and
>McGonnell claims to be confined to a pink velvet wing chair with
>casters and three forward speeds. Swilson has to spool his dick up
>into a Spandex pouch every morning, and Lots42 has intractable

...yes?

>migraines.

Oh.

>I don't know about anyone else.

Dave "and sometimes I'm not too sure about thee" DeLaney

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:36:54 AM11/20/06
to
>>You are SO sitting at the Venn Diagram table now.
>>
>>Dave "be careful where you place the chair, or else it might slide over onto
>> the Riemannian Manifold table" DeLaney
>
>If I do, I'm taking the Klein bottle with me.

That's okay, we never managed to get it more than 1/e full anyway.

Dave "Fortunatus' purse" DeLaney

Paula

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:37:49 AM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:13:19 GMT, Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses
<tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>In article <ld00m2pr1mnku0t5e...@4ax.com>,
> Paula <mmmtob...@earthlink.ent> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>> >>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
>> >>
>> >>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
>> >>
>> >What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
>> >with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
>> >Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
>>
>>
>> Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
>> desperate for attention, any attention at all. But trolling can be a
>> cry for attention, too.
>
> The word "attention" is inclusive of "negative attention," and being as
>how (<-- ANOTHER DARLA TROLL!) Tim responds to negative comments
>concerning either himself or his friends with apoplectic outrage, it
>would appear that he is not trolling for "any attention at all."

No, actually, that doesn't have any bearing on whether he has a huge
need for attention. Of course he prefers positive attention, who
doesn't? Just as clearly, he lacks the social skills to judge what is
likely to bring him negative attention instead of positive attention
and to handle it when the attention he gets from his efforts is
critical instead of approving. But he still is desperate for
attention and would take negative attention over no attention at all.
If he disappeared for a while when the attention was derogatory, you'd
have a stronger argument.

>I, on
>the other hand, truly *am* desperate for any kind of attention, either
>negative or positive.

Okay. That doesn't come as a big surprise, so I'll go with that.


>
> I'll admit to having been disappointed when two posted pieces of music
>of mine, as well as a graphic design portfolio, were both met with icy
>silence from arkians. True, the media of music and graphic design- and
>band photography, for that matter,- are not the provenance of ark;
>ARKians wants something textual they can quote, manipulate, deconstruct,
>and reconstruct into something fun'ni. But at the same time, ARK is also
>a journal where participants share what's been going on in their own
>lives, and to this degree our personal projects are fair game, even if
>we can't expect a ready-made appreciation society for the products of
>our efforts. The thing with Tim Chuma, though, is that he's stuck in
>Show-and-Tell mode most of the time, while only a small fraction of the
>time is he in participatory mode.

What are arkians supposed to say about your music and graphic arts
posts? I usually skip posts like that, even if they are IBC type
music posts and I really like the vast majority of the IBC guys. It's
just that music and graphic design is not that interesting to me and I
certainly don't have anything to add to a discussion on those topics.
So even if I were to take the time to listen or look, I wouldn't be
likely to respond. What would I say? I figure Kibo can talk graphic
design with you and others can talk original composition with you and
that's great. I don't whine that you shouldn't post it on ark, but I
don't have any reason to post a response. I doubt I'm the only one
who doesn't feel qualified to be a music critic. If that were all you
ever posted, you'd end up in my killfile not because I hate you as a
person but because there would be no point in seeing any of your posts
because of subject.
>
[snip]


> The kerfluffle with Laura on ark- and ensuing private correspondances-
>spilled over into real life, where I had vitriolic email exchanges with
>two other people, and one of them- the promoter for a d'n'b weekly I go
>to- attempted to ban me from the venue (I attended despite the ban,
>fully intending to fight him if he attempted to remove me bodily.
>Although the man working the door said I wasn't allowed in when I
>arrived, I was eventually admitted after being gently scolded in the
>parking lot. I like to think the apparent change of heart was because
>the promoter realized his hopes of "getting lucky" with Laura by siding
>against me were destined to fail.) I've since had to break off
>friendships with two other people because of it.

Why? Do you have too many psycho bitch supporting friends? I can't
remember how old you are, but if it any age past middle school age,
you should be able to find people to hang out with who don't play "if
you're enemies with so and so, you're enemies with me." From what I
remember of your posts, you're probalby going to have to find them in
places other than where you have been looking for friends, however.
One of the pitfalls of being in "poor sad me" victim mode is that you
attract victimizers as well as other victims. It's not likely to land
you in the middle of a bunch of well-adjusted and mature friends any
more than Chuma's plan of attack is getting him any actual dates.


>
> She also shared extremely private entries from my ark history with
>people. I have been chastened about sharing details of my life from this
>experience, and I feel bound from talking about people in my life for
>fear that she will contact these people, attempting to malign me, and
>sharing details of my life with them that they have no business knowing.

Well, yeah, better to learn what not to discuss on a public forum late
than not at all.


--
Paula
"Anyway, other people are weird, but sometimes they have candy,
so it's best to try to get along with them." Joe Bay

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:41:26 AM11/20/06
to
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses <tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>ARKians wants something textual they can quote, manipulate, deconstruct,
>and reconstruct into something fun'ni.

Just as a note, it seems to be impossible to google correctly for this
spelling of it, as google seems to think a ' is as good as a space.

>and to this degree our personal projects are fair game, even if
>we can't expect a ready-made appreciation society for the products of
>our efforts.

I must confess that I'm behind on downloading random muzix, having spent most
of my download-fu this year on Jonathan Coulton's stuff.

> Oh look... I forgot to censor/euphemise her name! Dear me, what a
>tragic oversight!

Dave "and now she is enshrined FOREVAH in the history of Google Groups; future
employment prospects BEWARE" DeLaney

Mark Edwards

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:47:43 AM11/20/06
to

Marc Goodman <marc.g...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>I WILL NOT BE COMPARED TO LIVER!


No cluons were harmed when bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>Yay, new meme!

Naw, it's just a variation on the "evil shatner" SNL skit. Also,
livers don't roam very far.


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 2:18:08 AM11/20/06
to
In article <1164001202.5...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"mantinin" <fcle...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
> > > Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
> > > desperate for attention, any attention at all. But trolling can be a
> > > cry for attention, too.
> <snip to avoid Darlawrath>

I see the potential for a great meme here. Can we retire some old ones
to clear out the way, like "btain" or "cup", or the entire premise of
Kibology being a religion?

> > I'll admit to having been disappointed when two posted pieces of music
> > of mine, as well as a graphic design portfolio, were both met with icy
> > silence from arkians.
>
>
> Eh, most of my usenet experience has been this way.I posted, sloppily,
> lyrics to "Armageddons Child", the version that begins with "Once a
> wheatfield now sandy", and missdplelled a word-which drew the only
> comment, the spelling.<shrug>

The formatting of your posts occasionally makes it difficult to tell
the difference between new material, reposted material, and material
appropriated from outside sources. You also post lots of lyrics from
other people.

That Van Halen "Dreams" video is truly motivational. All I need is a
few rails of coke and those blue skies will keep smiling on me 'till the
market crashes in 1987. Or, failing that, until your unclosed <shrug>
tag plunges us into an Age of Irony the likes of which people the late
'90s never could have fathomed.

BTW, am I the only one getting spammed with kooky '60s stock tips?
http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/stock.gif

> True, the media of music and graphic design- and
> > band photography, for that matter,- are not the provenance of ark;
> > ARKians wants something textual they can quote, manipulate, deconstruct,
> > and reconstruct into something fun'ni. But at the same time, ARK is also
> > a journal where participants
>
> Death Ray Distractor> LEO SGOUROS

Yeah, I though the Death Ray was all fun and games until I ended up
killing William Styron (although, from all accounts, this may have been
an act of mercy.) Do not test the Death Ray, do not operate the Death
Ray after taking Zelnorm, return Death Ray to its hermetic container
after using Death Ray, and please, for the love of God, no horseplay
around the Death Ray!

> One guy at a house party complimented my writing
> > in the story about the car crash outside my house, and another guy at a
> > club last Friday recognized me as "Tagutcow" and told me how much he
> > enjoyed "the piece about the homeless people." (Another side effect of
> > worlds-collision is that I had to edit out a reference to Temp Agency
> > Gurl from the former when I added her to my friends list.)
>
> Sometimes, you just have to tell people-HEY DU...@YOU.COM, its the
> internet.It isnt real.And yet a girlfriend of my ex got mercilessly
> stalked by someone on myspace-evil is as evil does.

It was a passing mention, butI was afraid that she would be disturbed
by the very fact that I even mentioned her, and that I assumed my
internet audience was already familiar with the character of Temp Agency
Gurl. The worst thing I've ever said about her is that she can be
bitchy; the best thing I said about her- that she's hawt- is more
problematic since she's engaged to the man she calls her "Jew plumber."

The fact that I get raked over the coals when I talk about my "Jew
dentist" illustrates the importance of context; also, of boobs.

> > My birthday party was a sad affair as I could only scrape together a
> > handful of people, although an innocent, offhanded question- "Whatever
> > happened to that crazy chick?"- was the best present I could have gotten.
> >
> > Oh look... I forgot to censor/euphemise her name! Dear me, what a
> > tragic oversight!
> >
>
> Death Ray Distractor>LEO SGOUROS
>
> I dont do clebrating at all for myself, so I do nout mourn.However, I
> am ANCIENT, so this, too, shall pass for you.

Meaning: With every passing year, your expectations are lowered
incrementally until you get to the point where you can't possibly be
disappointed any more.

BTW, I the "three-door grape" joke had me in stitches, so I posted it
in a MySpace bulletin. Aforementioned club promoter (before he
unfriended me) responded simply with "NOT funny!" I think it's probably
a pretty good litmus test of a person's sensibilities.

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 2:23:50 AM11/20/06
to
In article <slrnem2jc...@gatekeeper.vic.com>,
d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:

> Dave "and now she is enshrined FOREVAH in the history of Google Groups; future
> employment prospects BEWARE" DeLaney

  Even sadder: I don't know, nor have any way of finding out, what her
last name is.

shelly

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 8:29:03 AM11/20/06
to
David DeLaney wrote:

> Dave "I sympathize with the headaches, but suffering has been shown to
> produce ART in some cases" DeLaney

Two words: scintillating scotoma. If only it were half as much fun
as it looks.

--
Shelly (Warning: see label for details)
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 8:48:47 AM11/20/06
to
On 19 Nov 2006 22:08:04 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>
>> I mostly ignore Chuma's posts. We have very different interests, and
>> he doesn't really participate in a conversational way, so there's not
>> much in his posts for me. Lots, OTOH, ranges from funny to tedious to
>> pathetic to really,
>
>1) Thanks a lot.
>2) To really what?

To really annoying. Somehow that got lost before I hit Send.

>To loose latrec?

Not a band name, I think. Not quite an album title. Maybe a song
title?

BW

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 10:54:17 AM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:58:57 GMT, Darla Vladschyk
<Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:15 -0500, d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David
>DeLaney) wrote:
>
>>... handicaps don't
>>show here....
>
>Well, I have a wooden leg and a plastic cooter.

Better than the other way around, I suppose. You know, splinters.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:01:04 AM11/20/06
to

That's probably because the typo made that post stand out starkly from
the correctly spelled posts your random-text generator ordinarily
makes.

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:05:45 AM11/20/06
to
"Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses" <tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote

> I'll admit to having been disappointed when two posted pieces of music

> of mine, as well as a graphic design portfolio, were both met with icy
> silence from arkians.

Why is the silence icey, Clarice?

--oTTo--

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:06:30 AM11/20/06
to
<bar...@bookpro.com> wrote

> >>>Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
> >>>nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.
> >>
> >>
> >> Some of us may just have better communication skillz.
> >
> >I WILL NOT BE COMPARED TO LIVER!
>
> Yay, new meme!

How about liver with bacon?

--oTTo--

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:11:56 AM11/20/06
to
"Darla Vladschyk" <Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote

> >So it's not being meen per say that bothers you but being meen to
> >people who trigger some maternal instinct in you. ...
>
> Probably. Most liberals are like that. It's why we love and protect
> cute fuzzie mammals, and step on or shriek at spiders and reptiles,
> all the while claiming to be huddling under the "animal lover"
> umbrella.

And then rely on people like me to put meat on the table.
It's a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world.

--oTTo--

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:15:07 AM11/20/06
to
"Kevin S. Wilson" <res...@spro.net> wrote

> BTW, I still stand by my assertion that we're all attention-whores on
> this bus. Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't


> nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.

Considering the low ratio of replies to my posts, does that make me
the school slut, bully, or pariah? I'm pretty sure it's impossible
to be all three.

--oTTo--

shelly

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:21:06 AM11/20/06
to

You are the blonde girl from Freaks and Geeks!

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:31:31 AM11/20/06
to
<bar...@bookpro.com> wrote

> Now see, I try to refrain from being mean to Chuma most of the time
> because he cries so piteously when someone teases him or is meen to
> him. It's like smacking a puppy. Lots42, on the other hand, is


> capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
> He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
> reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
> dish it out).

You do realize, of course (that was rhetorical, no?), that you
were just mean to Chuma? In public? Damaging his poor little
ego?

I'm not being mean because he has me killfiled, but if you reply...
Cruel to be kind, but in the right measure. I like to think the
bozos are somehow benefiting from all this because otherwise,
what the hell? I'm rarely mean for the sake of being mean --
except in self defense, I'm trying to make some kind of a point
in an artistic way. Okay, sometimes there's no art. Rarely,
not even a point. QUIT HARSHING MY BUZZ!

Actually talking about it seems to defeat the whole porpoise.
Damn you, Barbara, for make teh baby dolphin cry!

> It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
> different treatment because he's "handicapped."

Except when playing golf. Won't anyone think of the golfers?!

--oTTo--

Dear Lots42: Try taping some golf tournaments to watch on those
sleepless nights

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:45:15 AM11/20/06
to
shelly <she...@cat-sidh.net> wrote:
>David DeLaney wrote:
>> Dave "I sympathize with the headaches, but suffering has been shown to
>> produce ART in some cases" DeLaney
>
>Two words: scintillating scotoma. If only it were half as much fun
>as it looks.

Are _you_ where Kibo's snake is living when it's not with him, then? (Yes, yes,
fnarr fnarr fnarrity fnarr, I know.)

Dave

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:45:59 AM11/20/06
to
Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:

>Darla Vladschyk <Darl...@Gmail.com> wrote:
>>d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
>>... handicaps don't show here....
>>
>>Well, I have a wooden leg and a plastic cooter.
>
>Better than the other way around, I suppose. You know, splinters.

JINX!

Dave "you owe me a Dr Peppr" DeLaney

shelly

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:47:57 AM11/20/06
to
David DeLaney wrote:
> shelly <she...@cat-sidh.net> wrote:
>> David DeLaney wrote:
>>> Dave "I sympathize with the headaches, but suffering has been shown to
>>> produce ART in some cases" DeLaney
>> Two words: scintillating scotoma. If only it were half as much fun
>> as it looks.
> Are _you_ where Kibo's snake is living when it's not with him, then? (Yes, yes,
> fnarr fnarr fnarrity fnarr, I know.)

Jay-sus! It's the Aylmer?!

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 12:00:29 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:54:17 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
wrote:

Also, it makes a better first line for a country song.

"I have a woooden leg and a plaaaastic cooter."

Go ahead, try singing that and then switching the positions of
"wooden" and "plastic" and sing that one.

BW

Marc Goodman

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 12:51:44 PM11/20/06
to Otto Bahn

I always pictured you more as the creepy, overweight, balding
sociology teacher who was always hitting on his female students
in a "ha ha, only serious" sort of way.

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:03:10 PM11/20/06
to
"Marc Goodman" <marc.g...@comcast.net> wrote

> >>BTW, I still stand by my assertion that we're all attention-whores on
> >>this bus. Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
> >>nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.
> >
> >
> > Considering the low ratio of replies to my posts, does that make me
> > the school slut, bully, or pariah? I'm pretty sure it's impossible
> > to be all three.
>

> I always pictured you more as the creepy, overweight, balding
> sociology teacher

Yay! At least I'm not a hippy!

> who was always hitting on his female students
> in a "ha ha, only serious" sort of way.

Only the cute "well dressed" ones. Don't get carried
away.

--oTTo--

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:13:00 PM11/20/06
to
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:58:16 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:

>Chris McGonnell <smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote:
>>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:32:20 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:
>>>But you're Allowed to cry for attention! ALLOWED I tell you!
>>
>>I SEE YOU, DAVE! YOU EXIST! And I'll also validate your parking.
>
>Is that what us n0t-y0ung peopum call it these days? Fair enough, let me
>get my "ticket" to be "stamped"...

Your "ticket" gets "punched" with a fancy stainless steel awl.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:15:05 PM11/20/06
to
On 18 Nov 2006 11:08:33 -0800, "Shepherd" wrote:

>
>Shepherd wrote:


>> Chris McGonnell wrote:
>> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:32:20 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:
>> >

>> > >On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:33 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:
>> > >>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:10:48 -0500, bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>> > >>>On 16 Nov 2006 23:01:08 -0800, "Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>Every time I try and have a decent night's sleep, something insane
>> > >>>>happens. I'm almost afraid to try now.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>We've seen the "try and" troll so many times it isn't funny anymore.
>> > >>>
>> > >>What about the Chuma-esque "Something happened to me and if you plead
>> > >>with me to tell you, I just might" aura about this post and others?
>> > >>Troll attempt? Or kinda sad cry for attention? Other?
>> > >

>> > >But you're Allowed to cry for attention! ALLOWED I tell you!
>> >
>> > I SEE YOU, DAVE! YOU EXIST! And I'll also validate your parking.
>

>Fragalistic..
>"Server encountered an internal error and could not complete my
>request", which was
>"Will you buy me a new pair of l.a. eyeworks??/??"

I'm sorry, Leo, but it's Council Opticians in this mall. Sure ya don't
want a 1968 pair of thick black frames?

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:17:18 PM11/20/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:31:04 -0500, TMG wrote:

>Darla Vladschyk wrote:
>
>
>> That hebephrenic grin creeps me out,..
>
>You may be on to something here. These look a lot like pics we've seen
>before.
>
>http://www.hebephrenic.net/gallery/index.php

You almost made me spill the coffee! You're just mean, turkey jerky!

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:22:55 PM11/20/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:31:04 -0500, TMG <T...@Nowhere.org> wrote:

>Darla Vladschyk wrote:
>
>> That hebephrenic grin creeps me out,..
>
>You may be on to something here.

WHY DO YOU HATE JEWS??!!

BW

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:23:20 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:31:31 -0500, "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:

> I'm rarely mean for the sake of being mean --
>except in self defense, I'm trying to make some kind of a point
>in an artistic way.

Same here, I guess, though I'm perfectly willing to admit that
sometimes the point I wish to make is "Grow the hell up and stop being
such a whiny twit." Also, you mispelled "autistic."

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:25:21 PM11/20/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:50:15 -0500, barbara wrote:
<justifying snipped>

>I mostly ignore Chuma's posts. We have very different interests, and
>he doesn't really participate in a conversational way, so there's not
>much in his posts for me.

Tim rarely makes my "must-read" list, mainly because I don't care for
bad Hong Kong movies or Austrian bands. I do hope he finds a job, just
as I did for Kibo.

> Lots, OTOH, ranges from funny to tedious to

>pathetic to really, and you never know what you'll get until you read
>the posts (except the "Conversations with ..." posts are almost
>garonteed to be funny. So him, I'll read.

I love barbara egging on the Lots42, because he bites back in a funny,
non-turkey-jerky way.

>But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
>no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
>us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
>at mine or yours or anyone else's.

No *real* cool table? Isn't that unAmurkin?

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:30:51 PM11/20/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:15 -0500, David DeLaney wrote:

>bar...@bookpro.com <bar...@bookpro.com> wrote:
>>I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
>>individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.
>
>DING DING clunk DING!
>
>Oops, I need to get that bell replaced. 'Scuse me.


>
>>Now see, I try to refrain from being mean to Chuma most of the time
>>because he cries so piteously when someone teases him or is meen to
>>him. It's like smacking a puppy. Lots42, on the other hand, is
>>capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
>>He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
>>reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as

>>dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given


>>different treatment because he's "handicapped."
>

>He can write, fairly well, and has his own style; other handicaps don't
>show here. I have no clue what color ... his dogs are, for example.

You gotta look at Darla's SmArk Petz page. Even Buster the Wonder Dog
is there! And I don't have a digital camera, so how Darla got a
pitcher of my dog is really making me paranoid.

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:36:54 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:58:57 GMT, Darla Vladschyk wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:15 -0500, d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David


>DeLaney) wrote:
>
>>... handicaps don't
>>show here....
>

>Well, I have a wooden leg and a plastic cooter. Paula's got one
>eyeball on a spring, Barbara's boobs are held on with Velcro, and
>McGonnell claims to be confined to a pink velvet wing chair with
>casters and three forward speeds.

Four forward speeds and it's not pink, it's "salmon!" And you forgot
the "Magic Fingers" option, though I'm always outta quarters so that
rarely gets used.

> Swilson has to spool his dick up
>into a Spandex pouch every morning, and Lots42 has intractable
>migraines.
>
>I don't know about anyone else.

You forgot Kibo's bad hair? I think there's only three strands left
and he does a comb-over.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula

>Nova Scotia, Canada
>--
>"I'm still here, you bastards!"
> ---Papillon
>
>http://www.yougotta.com/DARLA/

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:41:24 PM11/20/06
to
On 19 Nov 2006 22:13:04 -0800, Lots42 wrote:

<SNEEP>

>Many conservatives are like that too.
>
>People like the cute. That's why the bug Pokemon tend not to get such a
>big role on the show. But then we get the highly disturbing imagery of
>a canine bouncing across the dirt floor of the Hoenn League arena.

Them last two sentences were written in tongues, weren't they, boy?
That there Pentecostal spirit's got aholt of you.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:43:33 PM11/20/06
to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:25:04 -0500, Marc Goodman wrote:

>bar...@bookpro.com wrote:


>> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:24:47 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>> wrote:
>>>Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
>>>nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.
>>
>>

>> Some of us may just have better communication skillz.
>
>I WILL NOT BE COMPARED TO LIVER!

AND I'M NOT TURKEY JERKY!

shelly

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:46:50 PM11/20/06
to
Chris McGonnell wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:25:04 -0500, Marc Goodman wrote:
>
>> bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:24:47 -0700, Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Some of us just don't charge as much as others, and aren't
>>>> nearly as picky about who we get the attention from.
>>>
>>> Some of us may just have better communication skillz.
>> I WILL NOT BE COMPARED TO LIVER!
>
> AND I'M NOT TURKEY JERKY!

Thanks. Thanks a whole freakin' lot you two. The weird place that
is my brane just suddenly visualized liver pate "fruit" leather.
Somebody had better be going to Hell for that.

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:47:54 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:13:19 GMT, Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses
wrote:

<I SNIPPED IT ALL!>

That was sad and funny, grasshopper. Now take the pebble from my hand.

--
Master Po

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:55:05 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:18:08 GMT, Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses
wrote:

>In article <1164001202.5...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,


> "mantinin" <fcle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
>> > > Look at Chuma's posts as a whole and tell me whether you think he is
>> > > desperate for attention, any attention at all. But trolling can be a
>> > > cry for attention, too.
>> <snip to avoid Darlawrath>
>

> I see the potential for a great meme here. Can we retire some old ones
>to clear out the way, like "btain" or "cup", or the entire premise of
>Kibology being a religion?

Well, "btain" was me missing a typo before posting. But HOW DARE YOU
QUESTION THE PREMISE OF KIBOLOGY!? KIBO WAS ONCE EVERYWHERE ON THE
USENET! AT THE SAME TIME! Where's your god now, Moses?

>> > I'll admit to having been disappointed when two posted pieces of music
>> > of mine, as well as a graphic design portfolio, were both met with icy
>> > silence from arkians.

I'm too lazy to "click" on "links" most of the time.

--
Chris McG.

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 1:57:15 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:23:50 GMT, Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses
wrote:

>In article <slrnem2jc...@gatekeeper.vic.com>,
> d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
>
>> Dave "and now she is enshrined FOREVAH in the history of Google Groups; future
>> employment prospects BEWARE" DeLaney
>
>  Even sadder: I don't know, nor have any way of finding out, what her
>last name is.

And why would you want to?

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 2:05:05 PM11/20/06
to
"Chris McGonnell" <smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote

> >But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
> >no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
> >us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
> >at mine or yours or anyone else's.
>
> No *real* cool table? Isn't that unAmurkin?

There is no alleged cool table, but if there were, we
would not admit it existed. Some people think they
are sitting at the cool table when they are really
at another school that uses short buses. To them, I
suppose, it makes no difference. They live happily
ever after as if they were at the cool table, while
the alleged genuinely cool people smile condescendingly
as they rise to their apology.

While it is true that many people do have their own
relative mental image of the cool table, there are
some who believe there is an objective measure of
cool. In theory, there could be one real cool table
that only a select few sit at. While the masses go
through life with delusions of coolness, the perfect
people (who once were conceited) would sit in their
smugness at their own special table.

We deserve each other. Allegedly. People at the
cool table don't need to talk about it. What? What
makes you think I'm talking about it?

--oTTo--

Paula

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 3:25:24 PM11/20/06
to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:25:21 -0500, Chris McGonnell
<smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:50:15 -0500, barbara wrote:
><justifying snipped>
>
>>I mostly ignore Chuma's posts. We have very different interests, and
>>he doesn't really participate in a conversational way, so there's not
>>much in his posts for me.
>
>Tim rarely makes my "must-read" list, mainly because I don't care for
>bad Hong Kong movies or Austrian bands. I do hope he finds a job, just
>as I did for Kibo.

Well, yeah, so do I. He's not creepy as in needs to be locked away
and wished ill, just creepy as in don't want to read and makes me
wonder. And the Hong Kong movie reviews and pictures are boring.
Perhaps if I were a dood and desperate to see pictures of chyx, I
might feel differently about the clubbing recaps. I can't think of
anything that would get me excited about the movie reviews.

--
Paula
"Anyway, other people are weird, but sometimes they have candy,
so it's best to try to get along with them." Joe Bay

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 4:33:11 PM11/20/06
to
In article <1164002728....@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
"Lots42" <lot...@gmail.com> wrote:

> bar...@bookpro.com wrote:
> > So it's not being meen per say that bothers you but being meen to
> > people who trigger some maternal instinct in you.
>
> I prefer to think it's just that I charm the ever loving HELL out of
> the ladies. If I had a ripped set of abs, I would be unstoppable.

Heh heh. If that's all it takes, I need to work on my charm...

http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/zomg.jpg

Heh heh heh. Now I understand, ladies, if the instinct this triggers in
you isn't "maternal". Heh heh heh. But I will still suckkorz on ur
bQQbies. Heh.

(Take note: That's my "charm".)

> >I have no maternal
> > instinct--or if I do, it's undernourished and living in a closet under
> > the stairs (there are no stairs in my house, however).
>
> There are the doggy stairs in my house, which the dog refuses to use.

It would be humiliating... doggy steps are for girly poofy dogs who
can't jump onto a bed by themselves.

http://www.doggysteps.com/index.html

You know, becoming a rich man probably wouldn't be very difficult.
Where are you supposed to store these things when they're not in use?

> > I have different criteria for my own meenness seal of approval, and
> > individual criteria seem appropriate for Usenet.

> > Lots42, on the other hand, is
> > capable of firing back and seemingly has no problem with doing so.
> > He's plenty meen himself at times and should therefore, by my
> > reasoning, be treated like one of us (i.e., able to take it as well as
> > dish it out). It's so patronizing to say that he should be given
> > different treatment because he's "handicapped."
> >

> > BW
>
> But I am weird.

[ROB turns sharply left into parking space.]

ROB: Look at this... rock star parking!
ALLISON: It's a handicapped spot.
ROB: Damn... handicapped people always get rock star parking.
ALLISON: Handicapped people are rock stars.

--
robert caponi | I'm the banana boy
MAIL mailto:tagu...@earthlink.net | I'M FIERCE!
DUMB http://www.myspace.com/tagutcow | I'm the banana boy
SMRT http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/ | WOOooOOoooO!

Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 5:24:25 PM11/20/06
to
"Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses" <tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote

> [ROB turns sharply left into parking space.]
>
> ROB: Look at this... rock star parking!
> ALLISON: It's a handicapped spot.
> ROB: Damn... handicapped people always get rock star parking.
> ALLISON: Handicapped people are rock stars.

You are Lewis Carrol and I claim an autographed copy of
Alice In Wonderland.

--oTTo--

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 7:34:18 PM11/20/06
to

Chris McGonnell wrote:

> > Lots, OTOH, ranges from funny to tedious to
> >pathetic to really, and you never know what you'll get until you read
> >the posts (except the "Conversations with ..." posts are almost
> >garonteed to be funny. So him, I'll read.
>
> I love barbara egging on the Lots42, because he bites back in a funny,
> non-turkey-jerky way.

I try and encourage the A.R.K.R.K.A hymour

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 7:36:06 PM11/20/06
to

Chris McGonnell wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2006 22:13:04 -0800, Lots42 wrote:
>
> <SNEEP>
>
> >Many conservatives are like that too.
> >
> >People like the cute. That's why the bug Pokemon tend not to get such a
> >big role on the show. But then we get the highly disturbing imagery of
> >a canine bouncing across the dirt floor of the Hoenn League arena.
>
> Them last two sentences were written in tongues, weren't they, boy?
> That there Pentecostal spirit's got aholt of you.
>


I'll simplify it. Pokemon = cartoon where they have their pets fight.

Lots42

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 7:46:07 PM11/20/06
to

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
> It would be humiliating... doggy steps are for girly poofy dogs who
> can't jump onto a bed by themselves.
>
> http://www.doggysteps.com/index.html
>
> You know, becoming a rich man probably wouldn't be very difficult.
> Where are you supposed to store these things when they're not in use?

Don't insult my dogs.

And you step over them because it's best for the dog, you ass

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 8:54:59 PM11/20/06
to
shelly <she...@cat-sidh.net> wrote:
>David DeLaney wrote:
>> shelly <she...@cat-sidh.net> wrote:
>>> David DeLaney wrote:
>>>> Dave "I sympathize with the headaches, but suffering has been shown to
>>>> produce ART in some cases" DeLaney
>>> Two words: scintillating scotoma. If only it were half as much fun
>>> as it looks.
>> Are _you_ where Kibo's snake is living when it's not with him, then? (Yes, yes,
>> fnarr fnarr fnarrity fnarr, I know.)
>
>Jay-sus! It's the Aylmer?!

He never did, I think, tell us its name (he may not know it himself), so I
guess you'll have to ask it to carry a message to him.

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 8:57:26 PM11/20/06
to
Chris McGonnell <smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote:
>>He can write, fairly well, and has his own style; other handicaps don't
>>show here. I have no clue what color ... his dogs are, for example.
>
>You gotta look at Darla's SmArk Petz page. Even Buster the Wonder Dog
>is there! And I don't have a digital camera, so how Darla got a
>pitcher of my dog is really making me paranoid.

It's the Internet. Nobody knows, right?

Dave "search and retrieval daemons shaped like terriers" DeLaney

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 8:58:51 PM11/20/06
to
shelly <she...@cat-sidh.net> wrote:
>Chris McGonnell wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:25:04 -0500, Marc Goodman wrote:
>>> I WILL NOT BE COMPARED TO LIVER!
>>
>> AND I'M NOT TURKEY JERKY!
>
>Thanks. Thanks a whole freakin' lot you two. The weird place that
>is my brane just suddenly visualized liver pate "fruit" leather.

Glad to be of ass-istance.

>Somebody had better be going to Hell for that.

We're _working_ on it. Bob Hope died for our sins, you know!

Dave "creating mental mash-ups for nearly 40 years" DeLaney

David DeLaney

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 9:00:33 PM11/20/06
to
Chris McGonnell <smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote:
>Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
>> d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
>>>Dave "and now she is enshrined FOREVAH in the history of Google Groups; future
>>> employment prospects BEWARE" DeLaney
>>
>>  Even sadder: I don't know, nor have any way of finding out, what her
>>last name is.
>
>And why would you want to?

For mockaging purposes.

Dave "and/or mock-homaging and/or mock-hemmorhaging" DeLaney

PS: hush li'l poster, don't type a word / MOMA's gonna buy you a mockaging bird

PPS: Just don't tell Tom Richardson's wife!

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 9:02:53 PM11/20/06
to
In article <8is3m255hcfrchq3b...@4ax.com>,

Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:31:31 -0500, "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm rarely mean for the sake of being mean --
> >except in self defense, I'm trying to make some kind of a point
> >in an artistic way.

Well if you were sure of what kind of a point you were trying to make,
it wouldn't be artistic, now would it?

> Same here, I guess, though I'm perfectly willing to admit that
> sometimes the point I wish to make is "Grow the hell up and stop being
> such a whiny twit."

Whiny twits give me the hebephrenic shits!

I would incorporate Dean Lenort's spoonerism into this joak, but
between that and "cup", I'd just end up showing my age. Which is just my
was of admitting I can't figure out how.

> Also, you mispelled "autistic."

Alas, oTTo is out of the woods on that one.

And in fairness, Tim is the handsomest regular at Pint on Punt.

bar...@bookpro.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 9:12:27 PM11/20/06
to
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:02:53 GMT, Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses
<tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>In article <8is3m255hcfrchq3b...@4ax.com>,
> Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:31:31 -0500, "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm rarely mean for the sake of being mean --
>> >except in self defense, I'm trying to make some kind of a point
>> >in an artistic way.
>
> Well if you were sure of what kind of a point you were trying to make,
>it wouldn't be artistic, now would it?

Why not?

BW

Mark Edwards

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:02:56 PM11/20/06
to
[snips]

No cluons were harmed when Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

<tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> And in fairness, Tim is the handsomest regular at Pint on Punt.

And this doesn't frighten you?


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:04:31 PM11/20/06
to
In article <ejsu93$4nv$1...@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu>,
"Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:

> "Chris McGonnell" <smea...@notthisverizon.net> wrote
>
> > >But I don't expect anyone to have the same criteria as I do. There is
> > >no cool table. One of the things I like about Usenet is that each of
> > >us can set up our own imaginary cool table and it doesn't matter who's
> > >at mine or yours or anyone else's.
> >
> > No *real* cool table? Isn't that unAmurkin?
>
> There is no alleged cool table, but if there were, we
> would not admit it existed.

I would rather live my life believing that there is no cool table, only
to find out there is, than live my life as if there is a cool table,
only to find out there isn't. For the moment we start believing in the
cool table, it ceases to exist.

> Some people think they
> are sitting at the cool table when they are really
> at another school that uses short buses.

But handicapped people are rock stars!

> To them, I
> suppose, it makes no difference. They live happily
> ever after as if they were at the cool table, while
> the alleged genuinely cool people smile condescendingly
> as they rise to their apology.

So what is the difference between the two, when the subjective
attitudes of both the genuinely allegedly cool people and the deludedly
cool people apropos the cool table itself are identical?

This is reducible to any number of other philosophical problems, all
tricky.

We can never be sure of how others percieve us. Yeah, please keep me
posted on any developments in that story.

> While it is true that many people do have their own
> relative mental image of the cool table, there are
> some who believe there is an objective measure of
> cool. In theory, there could be one real cool table
> that only a select few sit at. While the masses go
> through life with delusions of coolness, the perfect
> people (who once were conceited) would sit in their
> smugness at their own special table.

[OTTO-SAN, DARLA, NICKO, SWILSON, and STACIA sit at a cool
table positioned in the middle of a black room. A single
incandescent bulb hanging from the ceiling illuminates the
scene.]

OTTO-SAN: A psychologically tested belief of our time is that the
central nervous system, which feeds its impulses directly to
the brain, conscious and subconscious, is unable to discern
between the real, and the vividly imagined experience. If
there is a difference, and most of us believe there is... am
I being clear? For to examine these concepts requires
tremendous energy and discipline.

SWILSON: Darla, I noticed you haven't touched your glass of cold
gravy with a hair in it.

DARLA: You can have it only if you give me your finger sandwich
for it.

OTTO-SAN: (exasperated) But then, why should anyone listen to me,
or should I speak, since I know nothing?

[JUMP CUT to LOTS42 reading a.r.k. on a computer. Suddenly, he
winces visibly.]

[SFX: High-pitched marcato-attack string unison.]

LOTS42 (with pained expression, to camera): Don't ever, but never,
make fun of no cripple!

[LOTS 42 reaches for his pills, but accidently knock them over.

LOUIE: I'M IN UR COMPUTER ROOM STEELIN' UR PAINKILLERS!

[LOUIE runs off with LOTS42's pills]

[LOTS42 grasps head with both hands as marcato string sound
increases in intensity.]

[ZOWIE ZOOM (with fancy CGI effects) into LOTS42's notstril,
passing through sundry viscera (one labelled 'GPOTB'), until
it stops at a black box.]

[SFX: string sound increases in intensity until violin string snaps]

[Sides of black box collapse in outward directions; OTTO-SAN, DARLA
NICKO, SWILSON, and STACIA emerge, looking slightly
disoriented.]

SWILSON: C'mon let's get outta this cafetera!

DARLA: But what about the food?

NICKO: Have it cleaned and burned!

[LEE BUMGARNER and TIM CHUMA apporoach the group with menacing
expressions.]

LEE BUMGARNER: Are you telling me that you don't see the connection
between sitting at the cool table and laughing at people?

TIM CHUMA (brandishing bowie knife): PLONK, MOTHERFUCKERS!

[Alarmed, OTTO-SAN, DARLA, NICKO, SWILSON, and STACI jump into
LOTS42's pons. Extended underwater psychedelic sequence
follows, until eventually they come against a glass wall, the
presence of which they indicate by banging their fists and
kicking at it.

[Camera dolleys back to reveal they are banging their fists against
the windows of a short bus filled to the top with water. KIBO
smiles back at camera from drivers seat, and drives off.]


> We deserve each other. Allegedly. People at the
> cool table don't need to talk about it. What? What
> makes you think I'm talking about it?

The cheap formica is just as cool to the touch in the library.

I was a member of the most exclusive clique in my high school. It was
so exclusive that I was the only one in it.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Nov 20, 2006, 11:31:01 PM11/20/06
to
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:02:53 GMT, Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses
<tagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>And in fairness, Tim is the handsomest regular at Pint on Punt.

For a fat girl, you sure don't sweat much.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages