> Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous
> and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal
> interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego
> compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority
> over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).

> For example, it has been previously established that

>         canada(California) = Oregon
>         canada(New York) = New Hampshire
>         canada(Australia) = New Zealand
>         canada(England) = Scotland

> The Fractal Theory of Canada.

>         For all A there exists C such that

>         C = canada(A)

> For example,
>         canada(USA) = Canada
>         canada(Canada) = Quebec
>         canada(Quebec) = Celine Dion

> It would appear that the hierarchy would bottom out an individual. However
> an individual is actually a community of tissues, tissues of cells, cells
> of molecules, and so forth down into the quantuum froth.

>         canada(brain) = pineal gland
>         canada(intestines) = colon
>         ...
>         canada(electron) = neutrino

> and so on. There is no bottom.

> "My God! It's full of Canadas!"