Message from discussion Fractal Theory of Canada

From: smja...@my-dejanews.com (Inflatable Space Bunny)
Subject: Fractal Theory of Canada
Date: 1999/05/04
Message-ID: <smjames-0405990201000001@206.170.2.139>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 473851647
X-Trace: typhoon01.swbell.net 925812287 206.170.2.139 (Tue, 04 May 1999 03:04:47 PDT)
Organization: Workshop of Telescopes
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 03:04:47 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.religion.kibology,can.politics,sci.physics
X-Complaints-To: abuse@swbell.net

Background.

Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous
and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal
interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego
compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority
over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).

For example, it has been previously established that

        canada(California) = Oregon
        canada(New York) = New Hampshire
        canada(Australia) = New Zealand
        canada(England) = Scotland


The Fractal Theory of Canada.

        For all A there exists C such that

        C = canada(A)


For example,
        canada(USA) = Canada
        canada(Canada) = Quebec
        canada(Quebec) = Celine Dion

It would appear that the hierarchy would bottom out an individual. However
an individual is actually a community of tissues, tissues of cells, cells
of molecules, and so forth down into the quantuum froth.

        canada(brain) = pineal gland
        canada(intestines) = colon
        ...
        canada(electron) = neutrino

and so on. There is no bottom.


"My God! It's full of Canadas!"

-- 
Fe mhats enearha esma; iufue dolha soentrides odoem esri.
Fe bhuearai osraha esma; iufue auaen bhuearai shahem essa.
CACS: http://homestead.dejanews.com/user.smjames/index.html
text: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Studios/5079/index.html
Megagilby's inflatable fantasy joy-toy and pinata.