Re: A lot v alot
Adam Funk
> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
another words "why"
[Mais où sont les KevinS d'antan?!?]
> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
> kibble group)?
You're the Louis XVIII of the USERNET.
--
History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of
urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.
(Thurgood Marshall)
Adam Funk
> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
> kibble group)?
Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
David DeLaney
>Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
>> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
>> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
>> kibble group)?
>
>Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
same as on web forumms.
Dave "so are you going to angrily tell us we're using LANGUAGE?" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
Doctroid
d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:38:41 +0000, Adam Funk <a24...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
> >> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
> >> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
> >> kibble group)?
> >
> >Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
>
> same as on web forumms.
>
> Dave "so are you going to angrily tell us we're using LANGUAGE?" DeLaney
What I can't figure out is, if kibology is infantile, why isn't Peter T.
Daniels here 24/7?
I mean, making fun of names? Doesn't get much more puerile.
--
Sig available on request.
- Doctroid
Eb Oesch
> In article <slrnhf6ucp.39i....@gatekeeper.vic.com>,
> d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:38:41 +0000, Adam Funk <a24...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > >> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
> > >> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
> > >> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
> > >> kibble group)?
>
> > >Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
>
> > same as on web forumms.
>
> > Dave "so are you going to angrily tell us we're using LANGUAGE?" DeLaney
>
> What I can't figure out is, if kibology is infantile, why isn't Peter T.
> Daniels
(if that IS his real name)
> here 24/7?
>
> I mean, making fun of names? Doesn't get much more puerile.
Not true! Nominology is a perfectly respectable and serious
discipline, based on well established scientific principles. Not
knowing the full middle name limits the precision of the reading, but
it does not invalidate the procedure. Exchange syllables between the
given name and surname, consult the red guide to determine which of
the blue volumes to use for the final reading, factor in the Great
Vowel Shift, transliterate to Hebrew, ah, yes, there we go. It turns
out that "Peter T. Daniels" signifies "a big, stinky doodyhead".
David DeLaney
>Doctroid <doctr...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>> �d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
>> > Dave "so are you going to angrily tell us we're using LANGUAGE?" DeLaney
>>
>> What I can't figure out is, if kibology is infantile, why isn't Peter T.
>> Daniels
>
>(if that IS his real name)
>
>> here 24/7?
>>
>> I mean, making fun of names? �Doesn't get much more puerile.
>
>Not true! Nominology
doo doo, du du du
>is a perfectly respectable and serious discipline, based on well established
>scientific principles.
Oh. Er, never mind.
>Not knowing the full middle name limits the precision of the reading, but
>it does not invalidate the procedure.
I think one person has actually guessed mine. Like, ever. Including 'with
hints'.
Dave
TimC
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
You forgot about the Spanish Inquisition (nobody expects it,
afterall), which banned two "o"s from orbiting each other.
That explains why you came up with "a big, stinky doodyhead" and not
"a big, stinky doidyhead"
--
TimC
Beating is one thing ... pounding accompanied by the shakes is a bit
unnerving -- Andrew Comeau in RHOD
Piet de Arcilla
> Eb Oesch <ericboe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Doctroid <doctr...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> >> d...@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote:
> >> > Dave "so are you going to angrily tell us we're using LANGUAGE?" DeLaney
>
> >> What I can't figure out is, if kibology is infantile, why isn't Peter T.
> >> Daniels
>
> >(if that IS his real name)
>
> >> here 24/7?
>
> >> I mean, making fun of names? Doesn't get much more puerile.
>
> >Not true! Nominology
>
> doo doo, du du du
>
> >is a perfectly respectable and serious discipline, based on well established
> >scientific principles.
>
> Oh. Er, never mind.
>
> >Not knowing the full middle name limits the precision of the reading, but
> >it does not invalidate the procedure.
>
> I think one person has actually guessed mine. Like, ever. Including 'with
> hints'.
De?
Bryce Utting
>> Exchange syllables between the
>> given name and surname, consult the red guide to determine which of
>> the blue volumes to use for the final reading, factor in the Great
>> Vowel Shift, transliterate to Hebrew, ah, yes, there we go. It turns
>> out that "Peter T. Daniels" signifies "a big, stinky doodyhead".
>
> You forgot about the Spanish Inquisition (nobody expects it,
> afterall), which banned two "o"s from orbiting each other.
ah yes, one of the two notable outcomes of the great Spoonish
Inquisition scandal of 1683.
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
If you don't know what you're doing in C, you get a compiler error
or a segfault. If you don't know what you're doing in PHP, you call
it phpBB.
-- Matt Palmer
Etienne Rouette
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
>> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
>> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
>> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
>> kibble group)?
>
> Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
Me too! I love V alot!
Not sure if I wuv the new one yet.
Etienne
PaulJK
> TimC <tcon...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
>>> Exchange syllables between the
>>> given name and surname, consult the red guide to determine which of
>>> the blue volumes to use for the final reading, factor in the Great
>>> Vowel Shift, transliterate to Hebrew, ah, yes, there we go. It turns
>>> out that "Peter T. Daniels" signifies "a big, stinky doodyhead".
>>
>> You forgot about the Spanish Inquisition (nobody expects it,
>> afterall), which banned two "o"s from orbiting each other.
>
> ah yes, one of the two notable outcomes of the great Spoonish
> Inquisition scandal of 1683.
No doubt you meant Spoonish Inquisitoon, didn't yoo.
pjk
Wiblur The Once
>> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
>> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
>> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
>> kibble group)?
>
> Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
I don't know about your's, but mine does it AutoMAGICALLY!!11!!
--
"I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family."
- George W. Bush
The Wiblovian Institute of Kibology
http://www.wiblovia.com
Otto Bahn
>>> But if you want to talk about "arrogant," howcome you hijack
>>> legitimate sci.lang threads by, at some point and without notice,
>>> crossposting them to your infantile buddies at "kibology" (aka the
>>> kibble group)?
>>
>> Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
>
> I don't know about your's, but mine does it AutoMAGICALLY!!11!!
Mine does it oTTomagically.
--oTTo--
Adam Funk
>> You forgot about the Spanish Inquisition (nobody expects it,
>> afterall), which banned two "o"s from orbiting each other.
>
> ah yes, one of the two notable outcomes of the great Spoonish
> Inquisition scandal of 1683.
Did they travel downstream on cunning punts?
--
Their tags shall blink until the end of days.
BoM 12:10
Adam Funk
>> Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
>
> Me too! I love V alot!
>
> Not sure if I wuv the new one yet.
You're trying a BSD out?
--
Taken on the whole however this is a fine disc and a good example of
the current pop scene attempting to break out of its vulgarisms and
sometimes downright obscene derivative hogwash.
(Julian Stone-Mason B.A., 1972)
Adam Funk
>>Our computers do it AUTOMATICALLY.
>
> same as on web formulæ
IFYPFY
> Dave "so are you going to angrily tell us we're using LANGUAGE?" DeLaney
I refer my esteemed colleague to the analysis of "beable doidy
woxwox".
[Once more, with pedantry]
--
Two of the most famous products of Berkeley are LSD and Unix.
I don't think that this is a coincidence. [anonymous]
Adam Funk
> What I can't figure out is, if kibology is infantile, why isn't Peter T.
> Daniels here 24/7?
>
> I mean, making fun of names? Doesn't get much more puerile.
See <8v0uk6x...@news.ducksburg.com>; it might be the fake one.
--
Take it? I can't even parse it! [Kibo]