Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: American Music Awards become 'modern Sodom'

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Science Stunted Bonsai Brain

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:21:55 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?

I hate to break it to you, but gay people ALREADY are permitted to
adopt children WITHOUT being married in most states other than Florida
and Arkansas. (ref. http://gaylife.about.com/od/gayparentingadoption/a/gaycoupleadopt.htm)

Defeating gay marriage is a case of closing the proverbial barn door
long after the horse left, if you're concerned about adoption.

Mark

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:24:14 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 1:21 am, Science Stunted Bonsai Brain <dearci...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>
> > Two questions:
>
> > 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> > doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> > children?
>
> I hate to break it to you, but gay people ALREADY are permitted to
> adopt children WITHOUT being married in most states other than Florida
> and Arkansas. (ref.http://gaylife.about.com/od/gayparentingadoption/a/gaycoupleadopt.htm)

>
> Defeating gay marriage is a case of closing the proverbial barn door
> long after the horse left, if you're concerned about adoption.

I think if you look closely you'll find that
most people don't know what they're talking
about most of the time. For this reason it is
prudent to be selective when deciding how
to spend your contemplative moments.

---
Mark

Mark Edwards

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:33:22 AM11/24/09
to
No cluons were harmed when Mark wrote:
>I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
>they're talking about most of the time.

I don't know what you're talking about...


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

Robibnikoff

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:18:06 AM11/24/09
to

"Mark Edwards" <Mark-E...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WbednVruTY4fWZbW...@supernews.com...

> No cluons were harmed when Mark wrote:
>>I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
>>they're talking about most of the time.
>
> I don't know what you're talking about...

Did somebody say something?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & Belly Dancer Supreme
BAAWA Knight
#1557


Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 10:25:32 AM11/24/09
to
"Robibnikoff" <witc...@broomstick.com> wrote

>>>I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
>>>they're talking about most of the time.
>>
>> I don't know what you're talking about...
>
> Did somebody say something?

It's a clear dichotomy -- they either said something,
or they said nothing. What's inside an empty egg?

--oTTo--

Quit Learing at me


Mark

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 11:08:46 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 10:25 am, "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:

> Quit Learing at me

Timothy Leary's dead.

---
Mark

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:52:58 PM11/24/09
to

No, no, no, no: he's outside, looking in.

Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951
"Hell, -I- saw it coming. And I'm a moron." - Lots42

Doctroid

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:14:31 PM11/24/09
to
In article <3ach18....@news.alt.net>, "J" <Jvis...@live.com>
wrote:

> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?

I don't know any normal people.

I don't know any these people either.

I definitely don't know any innocent children.

> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?

Yep. It's called an "on/off switch".

Then again, I don't know any sane people.

--
Sig available on request.

- Doctroid

pete

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:32:58 PM11/24/09
to
Science Stunted Bonsai Brain wrote:
> On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>Two questions:
>>1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
>>doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
>>children?
> I hate to break it to you, but gay people ALREADY are permitted to

I didn't see the show.

From the subject line,
my first guess was that "these people"
meant Hollywood celebrities in general.

--
pete

Piet de Arcilla

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:08:49 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 24, 6:33 am, Mark Edwards <Mark-Edwa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> No cluons were harmed when Mark wrote:
>
> >I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
> >they're talking about most of the time.
>
> I don't know what you're talking about...

If you know you don't know what you're talking about, then you do know
what you're talking about, in a way.

Mark

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:31:23 AM11/25/09
to

Unicorn math

---
Mark

Nicko

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 6:42:31 PM11/25/09
to

I'll see you one Unicorn Math and raise you one Pretzel Logic.

--
YOP...

0 new messages