Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).
For example, it has been previously established that
canada(California) = Oregon canada(New York) = New Hampshire canada(Australia) = New Zealand canada(England) = Scotland
The Fractal Theory of Canada.
For all A there exists C such that
C = canada(A)
For example, canada(USA) = Canada canada(Canada) = Quebec canada(Quebec) = Celine Dion
It would appear that the hierarchy would bottom out an individual. However an individual is actually a community of tissues, tissues of cells, cells of molecules, and so forth down into the quantuum froth.
> Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous > and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal > interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego > compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority > over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).
> For example, it has been previously established that
> canada(California) = Oregon > canada(New York) = New Hampshire > canada(Australia) = New Zealand > canada(England) = Scotland
> The Fractal Theory of Canada.
> For all A there exists C such that
> C = canada(A)
> For example, > canada(USA) = Canada > canada(Canada) = Quebec > canada(Quebec) = Celine Dion
> It would appear that the hierarchy would bottom out an individual. However > an individual is actually a community of tissues, tissues of cells, cells > of molecules, and so forth down into the quantuum froth.
> Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous > and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal > interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego > compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority > over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).
> For example, it has been previously established that
> canada(California) = Oregon > canada(New York) = New Hampshire > canada(Australia) = New Zealand > canada(England) = Scotland
> The Fractal Theory of Canada.
> For all A there exists C such that
> C = canada(A)
> For example, > canada(USA) = Canada > canada(Canada) = Quebec > canada(Quebec) = Celine Dion
> It would appear that the hierarchy would bottom out an individual. However > an individual is actually a community of tissues, tissues of cells, cells > of molecules, and so forth down into the quantuum froth.
A numismatic way! A fully, totally...hey what is that gibberish?
-- "We have to go forth and crush every world view that *trymailatelow doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech," *t...@avalon.n - David Brin *et,orllow@DJN Word of the week: "Namaskar" *~~(:-o)
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
In article <smjames-0405990201000...@206.170.2.139>, smja...@my-dejanews.com (Inflatable Space Bunny) wrote:
> Background.
> Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous > and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal > interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego > compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority > over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).
<snip>
Congratulations, sir! You have successfully caused myself and my colleagues here to laugh our respective kiesters off.
Yes, this is similar to the Fractal Yankee Theory. One day, while sharing a cigar with Fidel, I asked him what the real problem in the world is. " It's those Damn Yankee Imperialists!""If only we were rid of them!!" So I asked Fidel, "Where are those Yankees anyway?" He pointed North, toward Florida. "Up there, in the USA". I took a boat to Miami, got off, and asked the first person I saw, "Where are the Yankees?". "Up North, go to New York". I went to New York, and asked the first person I saw, "Where can I find Yankees?" The answer was, "New England. Try Massachusetts." I went to Boston, and asked the first person that I saw [not Kibo] "Where will I find some Yankees?" The answer was, "Maine, that's where the Yankees come from." So, I went to Portland, and asked the first person I saw, "Where will I find me some Yankees?" "Go up ta Bangah""Yep, that's where they are." Arriving in Bangor, I asked the first person I saw where I would find some gen-yoo-ine Yankee-type people in these parts. " Take Route 16 North up to Milo. They got lots of Yankees up there." I stopped in Milo and went to the general store. "I'm looking for a Yankee." "Oh, you must mean Clem. Take 11 north toward Brownville Junction and turn off on the dirt road to Schoodic Lake. You'll see his cabin about a mile off the main road." I followed the directions, went up to the cabin, and knocked on the door. But Clem was not at home. He was out in the world raising hell, getting Fidel and a lot of other people all pissed off. -- Less than 20 months until the start of the 3rd millenium!
> Given a community A and an adjacent community C, such that A is prosperous > and populous, and C is less populous and prosperous, and nonreciprocal > interest of C in the internal affairs of A, often C will need ego > compensation by occaisional noisy and noisome display of its superiority > over A. In this case C is said to be the _canada_ of A, C = canada(A).
> For example, it has been previously established that
> canada(California) = Oregon > canada(New York) = New Hampshire > canada(Australia) = New Zealand > canada(England) = Scotland
> The Fractal Theory of Canada.
> For all A there exists C such that
> C = canada(A)
> For example, > canada(USA) = Canada > canada(Canada) = Quebec > canada(Quebec) = Celine Dion
> It would appear that the hierarchy would bottom out an individual. However > an individual is actually a community of tissues, tissues of cells, cells > of molecules, and so forth down into the quantuum froth.
Beable van Polasm <bea...@my-dejanews.com> wrote in message news:7gr2bi$snm$1@nnrp1.deja.com... | In article <MPG.1198a56f827521f9989...@news.sprint.ca>, | tbomho...@sprint.ca (T Bomhower) wrote: | > In article <smjames-0405990201000...@206.170.2.139>, smjames@my- | > dejanews.com says... | > | > > "My God! It's full of Canadas!" | > | > Canadas everywhere you can look or Canadas everywhere you do look? | | How much Can can a Canadian Can, | If a Canadian can Can Can?
We have notified Mr. Shatner. He is informing our other agents in the area of this blatant anti-Canada propaganda being propagated by the improper propagandists.
Paul Schaefer is taking steps to remedy this even as we speak.
In alt.religion.kibology Inflatable Space Bunny <smja...@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
> In article <3735399a$0$32...@fountain.mindlink.net>, s...@netcom.com (Steve > McCormick) wrote:
[snipped one-line political rant]
> canada(can.politics) = Steve McCormick
[snork]
Ack! Don't do that while I'm drinking a soda! [1]
Thomas [1] Ow. How do you say "Help, I'm drowning," when soda is coming out your nose? ------------------------------------ thom...@binary.net http://www.binary.net/thomcat/ "If you aren't modeling what you are teaching then you are teaching something else."
In article <nyW13.31271$5e2.554...@news2.giganews.com>, J Thomas Howard <thom...@ravine.binary.net> wrote: [WHOOOOOSH!]
>[1] Ow. How do you say "Help, I'm drowning," when soda is coming out >your nose?
"Nggth Khwerk Blugghthrrp Nggth Fthyulck".
Unless that's one of Cthulhu's secret name, I always mix 'em up.
>"If you aren't modeling what you are teaching > then you are teaching something else."
Where dat from?
What dat mean?
Tell me now.
John. [Worried he may have to wear FASHION CLOTHES when giving lectures] -- John D Salt Dept of IS & Computing,| Barr's Law of Recursive Futility Brunel U, Uxbridge, Middx UB8 3PH | [BLORF]: If you are smart enough Disclaimers: I speak only for me. | to use one of these... you can Launcher may train without warning.| probably manage without one.
> In article <nyW13.31271$5e2.554...@news2.giganews.com>, > J Thomas Howard <thom...@ravine.binary.net> wrote: > [WHOOOOOSH!] >>[1] Ow. How do you say "Help, I'm drowning," when soda is coming out >>your nose? > "Nggth Khwerk Blugghthrrp Nggth Fthyulck". > Unless that's one of Cthulhu's secret name, I always mix 'em up.
Well, in case it is, _you_ get to try it first, 'k?
>>"If you aren't modeling what you are teaching >> then you are teaching something else." > Where dat from? > What dat mean? > Tell me now. > John. > [Worried he may have to wear FASHION CLOTHES when giving lectures]
[sigh]
I should be more careful of my tagline around here, shouldn't I?
Thomas ------------------------------------ thom...@binary.net http://www.binary.net/thomcat/ [tagline excised because I couldn't think of a good comeback to the comment about my last tagline]
|
