GOD, RELATIVITY & THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
George Hammond
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right. It was 3 am in a honky tonk section of Laural
Maryland a block from where George Wallace was shot. The
three punks in the car started blowing their horn. I knew
it was run or pull the K-Bar over my visor and probably kill
one of them in a fight. I jambed it into reverse flooring
the accelerator and spinning the steering wheel. The car
spun into a 180 facing the wrong way on a divided highway. I
gunned it into the oncoming traffic. The three punks in the
sedan followed suit and came after me! That was the day I
discovered the world's first scientific proof of God. I
discovered it while studying in the library of Congress on
Capitol Hill and was on my way home. Needless to say I got
away or I wouldn't be here telling you about it.
The way I discovered it is an interesting story. I'm a
physicist who got interested in psychology research. The
first thing I found out is that modern psychology research
consists mainly of an activity called Factor Analysis. They
use the world's largest computers to extract the
eigenvectors from 100x100 correlation matrices. The
correlations are obtained from psychology tests given to
hundreds of thousands of people world wide.
The upshot of all this is that they have known for
decades that every analysis results in exactly 4
eigenvectors, but being psychologists and not physicists
they have never been able to figure out why or what they
mean or where they come from. Being a physicist I
immediately recognized that the 4x4 matrix is what
physicists call, "curved". I went looking for the cause of
this curvature and soon discovered that it comes from the
3-axis orthogonal structure of the body, in particular the
3-axis cleavage of the brain. That accounted for 3 of the
eigenvectors, they were "space" related. The 4th one was IQ
which is mental speed and is time related. The curvature of
this matrix was actually caused by brain growth, in
particular the well known Secular Trend in human growth.
What I had discovered is that all of psychology is explained
by a curvature of subjective spacetime.... a CURVATURE OF
REALITY! . I was amazed at how simple this discovery was...
apparently I must have been the first physicist in history
to ever take psychology seriously. Little did I know how
momentous this discovery actually was!
Once the stunning fact is discovered that psychology is a
CURVATURE it is not long before one realizes that this
curvature is actually the explaination of "God"... yes, the
God of the Bible. Sure enough, the Secular Trend growth
deficit in the brain causes the "unconscious mind" which is
in fact the God of the Bible. Analysis soon showed that
this discovery explained the following 13 major historical
facts about the phenomenon of God:
1. There physically exists an "invisible world" known as
"Heaven" which is similar to Earth but is a paradise.
2. God is an "invisible man" who lives there and is all
powerful and rules the actual (visible) world from
there.
3. This God can effect miracles which transcend
the (known) laws of Physics.
4. Jesus said "God is a spirit" Jn 4:24
5. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
(many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
6. Christianity predicts the world is transforming itself
into Heaven and will actually complete this at a
date known as "Kingdom Come"... or the "end of the
world".
7. There is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
8. Jesus was the physical "incarnation of God"
9. The Cross for some reason is the central symbol of
(Western) Religion.
10. For some reason our main canonical text is written
in 4 identical versions known as the "4-Gospel Canon".
11. God "created the world" only a matter of "thousands"
of years ago (Genesis) not "billions" of years ago
(Big Bang) as Science believes.
12. God created man "in his own image".
13. There is a "Trinity of God", functionally or
operationally speaking.
the complete detailed explanation of all 13 of these
leading items PROVES without any doubt that a curvature of
subjective reality (the reality we see) is caused by the
brain growth deficit and explains the entire phenomenon of
God:
GO GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
Naturally I have published all of this in the peer
reviewed literature in order to protect my priorities, and I
am currently writing a book. My peer published papers are
prominantly posted on my website for your reading
convenience (url in signature file below).
Meanwhile, the discovery of the world's first scientific
proof of God is my calling card to history.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror sites
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
Madge
wrote:
> Copyright 2009 Madge
Hi George, Piss off
--
http://www.madge.tk Madges Links
http://twitter.com/MadgeTwits Yes IKNOW.
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
CIA Brainwashing Techniques
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=Z91bg9BghaE&feature=related
How to Brainwash a Nation
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ8ZvYNlxiM&feature=related
--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!
"Madge" <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> kirjoitti
viestiss�:op.u2zg11ggf11096@loutside...
Lits O'Hate
> My peer published papers are
> prominantly posted on my website for your reading
> convenience
Wow. You can even make spelling errors using speech
recognition software. Very impressive, George!
--
"God's feet are 16" long, and his IQ is 333." -- George Hammond
Nicko
> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>
> WASHINGTON D.C.
> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
> on my right.
You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
like, sooo cool!
Or maybe it's just a matter of frame of reference.
--
YOP...
George Hammond
<lits...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 6, 8:02�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> My peer published papers are
>> prominantly posted on my website for your reading
>> convenience
>
>Wow. You can even make spelling errors using speech
>recognition software. Very impressive, George!
>
>
[Hammond]
Let's try that one again. "prominently", hmmm Dragon spells
it correctly. Must've been an editing typo.
Madge
wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:19:03 -0500, Madge
> <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:02:14 -0500, George Hammond
>> <Nowh...@notspam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Copyright 2009 Madge
>>
>> Hi George, Piss off
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> Quit sliding that greased Coke bottle in and out of your ass
> Madge, it'll give you a foreign accent.
> ========================================
In zis cuntry ve haf no bottles mai I use yor ego
Madge
wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:35 -0000, Madge
> <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:51:02 -0000, George Hammond
>> <Nowh...@notspam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:19:03 -0500, Madge
>>> <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:02:14 -0500, George Hammond
>>>> <Nowh...@notspam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Copyright 2009 Madge
>>>>
>>>> Hi George, Piss off
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Quit sliding that greased Coke bottle in and out of your ass
>>> Madge, it'll give you a foreign accent.
>>> ========================================
>>
>> In zis cuntry ve haf no bottles mai I use yor ego
>>
>>
> If you'll speak German and tattoo a large swastica across
> your ass that I can watch all night I'll marry you!
Mein Mann denken, der Sie sind sￜￜ und.
George Hammond
<deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:50:42 -0500, George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net>
>wrote:
>
>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:35 -0000, Madge
>> <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:51:02 -0000, George Hammond
>>> <Nowh...@notspam.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:19:03 -0500, Madge
>>>> <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:02:14 -0500, George Hammond
>>>>> <Nowh...@notspam.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Copyright 2009 Madge
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi George, Piss off
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> [Hammond]
>>>> Quit sliding that greased Coke bottle in and out of your ass
>>>> Madge, it'll give you a foreign accent.
>>>> ========================================
>>>
>>> In zis cuntry ve haf no bottles mai I use yor ego
>>>
>>>
>> If you'll speak German and tattoo a large swastica across
>> your ass that I can watch all night I'll marry you!
>
>Mein Mann denken, der Sie sind s�� und.
>
>
oooh stop it baby I'm cummin........ you're TOOOOO HOT for
me!
Doctroid
Madge <deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:51:02 -0000, George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net>
> wrote:
>
> > [Hammond]
> > Quit sliding that greased Coke bottle in and out of your ass
> > Madge, it'll give you a foreign accent.
> > ========================================
>
> In zis cuntry ve haf no bottles mai I use yor ego
Your ass isn't that big, Madge.
--
Sig available on request.
- Doctroid
George Hammond
clumbsy neutroid, get the f... away from my squeeze.
Madge
<<f378f5ddbe6cq4t99...@4ax.com>> wrote:
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god <<<-----
It's dead Jim!! Geocities shut down last month. However you have been
archived for posterity here
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
George Hammond
Not to worry Toots, I keep several identical mirror sites in
operation at all times with independent ISP's so I CAN'T be
shut down, ever:
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
Dr. HotSalt
> Not to worry Toots, I keep several identical mirror sites in
> operation at all times with independent ISP's so I CAN'T be
> shut down, ever:
Good. I think I warned you about that some time ago. I still
recommend you get an independent database server (hacker-proofed up
the wazoo of course) going in case the whole international cyberwar
thing goes critical and even the Wayback Machine gets wiped. Now that
mass ROM storage is cheaper by the gigabyte these days you might
consider going that route; no erasable storage at all.
George, we may have a real-world acquaintance in common. Did you
take any classes in either Phoenix College or Grand Canyon University
in or near Phoenix AZ during the late 60's to early 70's?
Do you remember a James Thomas Crowder? He may have used either Jim
or Tom as his first name at the time.
Mark L. Fergerson
George Hammond
<alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 7, 10:00�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
>> Not to worry Toots, I keep several identical mirror sites in
>> operation at all times with independent ISP's so I CAN'T be
>> shut down, ever:
>
> Good. I think I warned you about that some time ago.
>
>
[Hammond]
With all due respect, the day you need to warn me will
be the day hell freezes over. my website not only has
multiple mirror copies in operation 24-7-365, I also have
every square inch of the website backed up on DVDs, flash
drives and hard drives and online storage. Think about it
for Christ's sake; what do you think the guy who's
discovered and published the world's first scientific proof
of God knows about danger? don't be ridiculous!
>
>
>recommend you get an independent database server (hacker-proofed up
>the wazoo of course) going in case the whole international cyberwar
>thing goes critical and even the Wayback Machine gets wiped. Now that
>mass ROM storage is cheaper by the gigabyte these days you might
>consider going that route; no erasable storage at all.
>
[Hammond]
I don't need Way-back or any other machines to backup my
website. DVD backup copies of every square inch of the site
are in several bank safe deposit boxes. Don't be
ridiculous. who do you think you're talking to, an amateur!
>
>
> George, we may have a real-world acquaintance in common. Did you
>take any classes in either Phoenix College or Grand Canyon University
>in or near Phoenix AZ during the late 60's to early 70's?
>
>
[Hammond]
No, never heard of the place. Someone like me does not
"take courses" in anything. My CV has Ben posted a
bazillion times on USENET it shows that I have 2 degreesin
theoretical physics from accredited universities in
Massachusetts.
What amazes me is that you've been talking to me for 10
years and you still don't know why am!
>
>
> Do you remember a James Thomas Crowder? He may have used either Jim
>or Tom as his first name at the time.
>
[Hammond]
never heard of the guy.
>
> Mark L. Fergerson
Otto Bahn
> WASHINGTON D.C.
> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
> on my right.
<
<You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
<like, sooo cool!
<
<Or maybe it's just a matter of frame of reference.
I saw a Law & Order where they framed a reference.
--oTTo--
Bob Casanova
sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com>:
>"Nicko" <nervou...@gmail.com> wrote
>> WASHINGTON D.C.
>> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
>> on my right.
><You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
><like, sooo cool!
I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
screed into one sentence, like this one:
"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
photograph of Kessler that Bradford had found at the dark,
sinister house in the Schillerstrasse the day that Straub
told Percival that the man on the bridge had not been
Aksakov but Paustovsky, which meant that is was not Kleist
but Kruger that Cherensky had met in the bleak, wintry
Grunewald and that, therefore, only Frau Epp could have
known that Muller had followed Droysen to the steamy,
aromatic cafe in the Beethovenstrasse where he told Buerger
that Todorov had known since the Liebermann affair that
McIntyre had not met Stoltz at the Goerlitzer Bahnhof but
instead had met Sommer at the cavernous Anhalter Bahnhof."
(Winner, Spy Fiction category, 1984)
><Or maybe it's just a matter of frame of reference.
>I saw a Law & Order where they framed a reference.
I think I saw that one... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Otto Bahn
>>> WASHINGTON D.C.
>>> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
>>> on my right.
>
>><You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
>><like, sooo cool!
>
> I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
>
> http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Otto!"
And he did.
--oTTo--
George Hammond
wrote:
[Hammond]
The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees
The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas
The road was a ribbon of moonlight across the purple moor
When Hammond saw the castle wall grey as a piece of slate
He nailed his thesis in peer review form upon the city gate
And a 1000 years to the proof of God marked his final fate
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
George Hammond
[Hammond]
There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
Simple minded dimwit!
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
Don Stockbauer
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
>
>
>
> <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
> >sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com>:
>
But you missed the REAL proof of God:
"God and the Universe are identical memes."
Bryce Utting
> It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
> the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
> the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
> said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
> And he did.
IFYPFY.
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
If this is UI for anyone - even TimC - I shall be extremely alarmed.
-- Dan Birchall
George Hammond
<don.sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP CRAP>
>> GEORGE �HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>
>But you missed the REAL proof of God:
>
>"God and the Universe are identical memes."
>
>
[Hammond]
You have stated the classic atheist position. Atheists
of course are the world's last and only ABSOLUTE FOOLS.
Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
ABSOLUTE FOOL.
It is doubtful that you will ever live long enough to
find out what God actually is. Ironic that the world's most
common mystery has absolutely passed you by unnoticed.
A self-satisfied and busy fool like you spends his life
tinkering with motorcycles and is quizzically perplexed by
all this commotion about "God".
It just goes to show how selfish and ignorant deceipt
comes full circle like an errant torpedo to sink its
practitioner. What a laugh.
An entire world of meek and responsible people has
noticed long ago that a substantial fraction of every human
being is INVISIBLE (ungrown) and that this invisible man is
commonly called "God". But you in your haughty ignorance
think that is only a matter of biology, money, or
genetics..... of course you know it's the source of all the
trouble and the basis of every human contest, but your
towering ignorance is so great that it never occurred to you
that THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS ABOUT IT and has been talking
about it for 10,000 years..... and they call the phenomenon
"God".
"Poetic justice"is to be your fate Stockbauer, and oh so
subtle and sublime is the vengeance of the Lord on the smug,
the hypocritical, and the self-satisfied. but not to worry
Stockbauer, you'll have plenty of company where you're
going.... you can spend the rest of eternity passing the day
with Kurt Waldheim and other materialistic fools of your
ilk.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
George Hammond
<but...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
>Otto Bahn <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>> It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
>> the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
>> the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
>> said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
>> night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Matt!"
>> And he did.
>
>IFYPFY.
>
>
>butting
>
>
[Hammond]
The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees
The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas
The road was a ribbon of moonlight across the purple moor
When Hammond saw the castle walls grey as a piece of slate
He nailed his thesis in peer review form upon the city gate
And a 1000 years to the proof of God became his final fate
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
Bryce Utting
>>> The story began...It was a stormy
>>> night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Matt!"
>>> And he did.
>>
>>IFYPFY.
>>
>
> The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees
> The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas
> The road was a ribbon of moonlight across the purple moor
> When Hammond saw the castle walls grey as a piece of slate
> He nailed his thesis in peer review form upon the city gate
> And a 1000 years to the proof of God became his final fate
cut it *out*, Matt!
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
'Tis the fell work of the international floating-head-missile-zombie-
erupting-tentacle cartel.
-- John D Salt
Otto Bahn
.
> Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
> voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
> It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
> absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
> ABSOLUTE FOOL.
Voice dictation has an all-caps mode?
ELEVENTY!
--oTTo--
George Hammond
wrote:
>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote
>--oTTo--
>
[Hammond]
Of course it does storm trooper.... every word processing
function known to man has a verbal command which the voice
recognition program immediately recognizes.
Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
Windows for chrissakes!
Dr. HotSalt
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:09:29 -0800 (PST), "Dr. HotSalt"
>
> >On Nov 7, 10:00 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> >> Not to worry Toots, I keep several identical mirror sites in
> >> operation at all times with independent ISP's so I CAN'T be
> >> shut down, ever:
>
> > Good. I think I warned you about that some time ago.
>
> [Hammond]
> With all due respect, the day you need to warn me will
> be the day hell freezes over. my website not only has
> multiple mirror copies in operation 24-7-365, I also have
> every square inch of the website backed up on DVDs, flash
> drives and hard drives and online storage. Think about it
> for Christ's sake; what do you think the guy who's
> discovered and published the world's first scientific proof
> of God knows about danger? don't be ridiculous!
I warned you against trying to get recognition and assistance
spreading word about the SPOG from existing religious institutions but
you went ahead and tried anyway. How did that work out for you again?
> >recommend you get an independent database server (hacker-proofed up
> >the wazoo of course) going in case the whole international cyberwar
> >thing goes critical and even the Wayback Machine gets wiped. Now that
> >mass ROM storage is cheaper by the gigabyte these days you might
> >consider going that route; no erasable storage at all.
>
> [Hammond]
> I don't need Way-back or any other machines to backup my
> website. DVD backup copies of every square inch of the site
> are in several bank safe deposit boxes. Don't be
> ridiculous. who do you think you're talking to, an amateur!
DVDs are not forever; acid-free paper is actually more long-lived.
PROM (useta be called WORM) is more easily re-convertable to active
web content, absolutely hacker-proof once "burned", and is practically
in freefall price-wise.
As I'm sure you're aware, hackers in various Asian countries are
attacking sites, both public and private, all over the web in what
various US government agencies believe is a workup to attempts to
compromise or even completely crash at least the US part of the
Internet. I am merely concerned that you might become collateral
damage.
> > George, we may have a real-world acquaintance in common. Did you
> >take any classes in either Phoenix College or Grand Canyon University
> >in or near Phoenix AZ during the late 60's to early 70's?
>
> [Hammond]
> No, never heard of the place. Someone like me does not
> "take courses" in anything. My CV has Ben posted a
> bazillion times on USENET it shows that I have 2 degreesin
> theoretical physics from accredited universities in
> Massachusetts.
You had to "take courses" to get your degrees. I see you've cycled
back into your arrogant-manic mode. Careful what it makes you say. ;>)
> What amazes me is that you've been talking to me for 10
> years and you still don't know why am!
I know who you are. Sometimes you don't though; now that you're in
your manic phase maybe you'll find the energy to consider how manic-
depression is explained by the SPOG.
> > Do you remember a James Thomas Crowder? He may have used either Jim
> >or Tom as his first name at the time.
>
> [Hammond]
> never heard of the guy.
Never mind. Crowder reports the other Hammond had a different given
name.
Mark L. Fergerson
George Hammond
<alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 8, 3:29�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:09:29 -0800 (PST), "Dr. HotSalt"
>>
>> <alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Nov 7, 10:00�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> Not to worry Toots, I keep several identical mirror sites in
>> >> operation at all times with independent ISP's so I CAN'T be
>> >> shut down, ever:
>>
>> > �Good. I think I warned you about that some time ago.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> � � With all due respect, the day you need to warn me will
>> be the day hell freezes over. �my website not only has
>> multiple mirror copies in operation 24-7-365, I also have
>> every square inch of the website backed up on DVDs, flash
>> drives and hard drives and online storage. �Think about it
>> for Christ's sake; what do you think the guy who's
>> discovered and published the world's first scientific proof
>> of God knows about danger? �don't be ridiculous!
>
> I warned you against trying to get recognition and assistance
>spreading word about the SPOG from existing religious institutions but
>you went ahead and tried anyway. How did that work out for you again?
>
>
>
[Hammond]
How many times do I have to tell you? You're not in a
position to warn me about anything. you just fancy that
you'd like to be.... sorry, amateurs that have nothing to
say on topic about the theory do not automatically get
promoted to executive adviser as a booby prize.
>
>
>> >recommend you get an independent database server (hacker-proofed up
>> >the wazoo of course) going in case the whole international cyberwar
>> >thing goes critical and even the Wayback Machine gets wiped. Now that
>> >mass ROM storage is cheaper by the gigabyte these days you might
>> >consider going that route; no erasable storage at all.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> � �I don't need Way-back or any other machines to backup my
>> website. �DVD backup copies of every square inch of the site
>> are in several bank safe deposit boxes. �Don't be
>> ridiculous. �who do you think you're talking to, an amateur!
>
> DVDs are not forever; acid-free paper is actually more long-lived.
>PROM (useta be called WORM) is more easily re-convertable to active
>web content, absolutely hacker-proof once "burned", and is practically
>in freefall price-wise.
>
>
[Hammond]
I know all that and a professional like me is already
covered six ways from Sunday. If you can't post on topic
find something else to do.
>
>
> As I'm sure you're aware, hackers in various Asian countries are
>attacking sites, both public and private, all over the web in what
>various US government agencies believe is a workup to attempts to
>compromise or even completely crash at least the US part of the
>Internet. I am merely concerned that you might become collateral
>damage.
>
>
[Hammond]
The day I become collateral damage will be the day hell
freezes over, are you kidding. I'm already the target,
you're the one who's risking collateral damage just by
sitting therer and trying to talk to me about nothing and
demonstrating to really perverse people that you have no
idea whatsoever who you're taking to or what you're talking
about. By doing that you're a sitting duck for any Internet
sleaze who is smart enough to actually know I am and what
this is about.
>
>
>> > �George, we may have a real-world acquaintance in common. Did you
>> >take any classes in either Phoenix College or Grand Canyon University
>> >in or near Phoenix AZ during the late 60's to early 70's?
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> � �No, never heard of the place. �Someone like me does not
>> "take courses" in anything. �My CV has Ben posted a
>> bazillion times on USENET it shows that I have 2 degreesin
>> theoretical physics from accredited universities in
>> Massachusetts.
>
> You had to "take courses" to get your degrees. I see you've cycled
>back into your arrogant-manic mode. Careful what it makes you say. ;>)
>
>
>
[Hammond]
quit being stupid. I enrolled in accredited universities
in Massachusetts and took 2 degrees in theoretical physics
just like every other physicist does. I've told you that a
bazillion times and my CV is posted prominently on my
website to prove it.
As for arrogance and rudeness you don't even know the
half of it.... just by sitting there arrogantly trying to
engage me in a discussion of high school level computer
science and having no idea what this discussion is about
physiciswise is insulting to begin with. Wake up, it's so
painfully obvious that you have no idea who you're talking
to or what you're talking about that it is ludicrous.
>
>
>> � What amazes me is that you've been talking to me for 10
>> years and you still don't know why am!
>
> I know who you are.
>
>
[Hammond]
Yeah we already know what you know and what you don't know!
Unfortunately you have neither the credentials, education or
peer revfiewed publications to back it up. that makes you
just another wannabee nobody with nothing on topic to say
who is envious and who would like to find SOME OTHER WAY to
cross paths with me. forget it dude, if you can't walk the
walk you can't talk the talk.... I can't be conned!
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> Windows for chrissakes!
OMG! You can't count, either!
WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
Otto Bahn
>>> Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
>>> voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
>>> It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
>>> absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
>>> ABSOLUTE FOOL.
>>
>>Voice dictation has an all-caps mode?
>>--oTTo--
>>
> [Hammond]
> Of course it does storm trooper.... every word processing
> function known to man has a verbal command which the voice
> recognition program immediately recognizes.
That's only available in the professional version, which
I doubt you can afford.
> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> Windows for chrissakes!
Windows are measured in inches or feet, not bytes.
--oTTo--
BURT
> In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9j5jiir2vi1j0jc...@4ax.com>,
> George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> > Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> > Windows for chrissakes!
>
> OMG! You can't count, either!
> WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
Relaivity is the theory of the appearance of things moving around you.
Mitch Raemsch
Otto Bahn
>>> >> Not to worry Toots, I keep several identical mirror sites in
>>> >> operation at all times with independent ISP's so I CAN'T be
>>> >> shut down, ever:
>>>
>>> > Good. I think I warned you about that some time ago.
>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> With all due respect, the day you need to warn me will
>>> be the day hell freezes over. my website not only has
>>> multiple mirror copies in operation 24-7-365, I also have
>>> every square inch of the website backed up on DVDs, flash
>>> drives and hard drives and online storage. Think about it
>>> for Christ's sake; what do you think the guy who's
>>> discovered and published the world's first scientific proof
>>> of God knows about danger? don't be ridiculous!
>>
>> I warned you against trying to get recognition and assistance
>>spreading word about the SPOG from existing religious institutions but
>>you went ahead and tried anyway. How did that work out for you again?
>>
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> How many times do I have to tell you? You're not in a
> position to warn me about anything. you just fancy that
> you'd like to be.... sorry, amateurs that have nothing to
> say on topic about the theory do not automatically get
> promoted to executive adviser as a booby prize.
How about assistant executive adviser?
--oTTo--
Otto Bahn
--oTTo--
George Hammond
wrote:
>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote
[Hammond]
That kind of humility is a sign of real intelligence. Quit
scaring me!
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
Google, schmuck.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
WRONG. General Relativity includes the theory of
gravitational fields causing time dilations and space
contractions WITHOUT ANYTHING MOVING AT ALL!
In fact, it is the theory of General Relativity that is
the cause of God.... NOT the theory of Special Relativity
which is the theory of relativistic MOTION.
George Hammond
wrote:
>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote
>
>>>> Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
>>>> voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
>>>> It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
>>>> absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
>>>> ABSOLUTE FOOL.
>>>
>>>Voice dictation has an all-caps mode?
>>>--oTTo--
>>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Of course it does storm trooper.... every word processing
>> function known to man has a verbal command which the voice
>> recognition program immediately recognizes.
>
>That's only available in the professional version, which
>I doubt you can afford.
>
>
[Hammond]
Wrong on both counts shithead.
>
>
>> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
>> Windows for chrissakes!
>
>Windows are measured in inches or feet, not bytes.
>--oTTo--
>
[Hammond]
That's YOUR measurement of Windows bicycle mechanic.
My measurement of Windows is in subjective space time not
objective space time and includes the time dilation and
space magnification. You look through windows to see the
street, I looked through windows of heaven to see God.
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:03 -0600, John Stafford
> <nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9...@4ax.com>,
> > George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> >> Windows for chrissakes!
> >
> >OMG! You can't count, either!
> >WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
> >
> [Hammond]
> Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
> the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
> guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
> immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
> Google, schmuck.
Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
George Hammond
<nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>In article <mvpjf5dkae1ik964k...@4ax.com>,
> George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:03 -0600, John Stafford
>> <nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9...@4ax.com>,
>> > George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
>> >> Windows for chrissakes!
>> >
>> >OMG! You can't count, either!
>> >WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
>> >
>> [Hammond]
>> Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
>> the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
>> guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
>> immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
>> Google, schmuck.
>
>Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
>
>
[Hammond]
WRONG know nothing heckling dipshit. The scientific
method means publishing your research in a peer-reviewed
academic journal, which I have done:
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
INTERNET communication is 90% about kicking kook ass,
kooks like you. That's not science, that's informal
criminologyand pro bono public service. Screw!
annf...@yahoo.com
> The gopher saw his tail! Yay! Six more weeks of fall.
>
> --oTTo--
I saw Juncos last week, so you know what that means.
Don Stockbauer
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:40:14 -0800 (PST), DonStockbauer
>
> subtle and sublime is the vengeance of the Lord on the smug,
> going.... you can spend the rest of eternity passing the day
> with Kurt Waldheim and other materialistic fools of your
> ilk.
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
God and the Universe being the same thing is a great model of reality,
much better than your "SPOG" delusion. So rant and rave on. Who
cares?
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You care or you wouldn't be here. I correspond with
professionals by private e-mail and professional (moderated)
Internet lists, and in the peer-reviewed journals, and by
private correspondence and now am even dictating a 300 page
book. Several million people have hit my websites, an
Australian rock group even recorded a song about me (see URL
below).
The announcement and publication of a major scientific
discovery was the strong scent of blood in the water which
just won't go away.
I'm just here on USENET to tweak up my Dragon-10 voice
dictation system which I'm using to dictate my book. And
boy, is it working spiffy!
Bob Casanova
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
<Nowh...@notspam.net>:
What a shame, then, that it wasn't the product of a 'bot at
all, but exactly what it claimed to be. Perhaps you're in
transference mode...?
> Simple minded dimwit!
Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
George Hammond
<nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
[Hammond]
Great scholars and true intellectuals like myself do not
speak any yuppie language such as "transference mode". We
speak in simple universal poor man's English.
Unlike you, I'm not a phony smart ass! I got the courage
to talk to people, any people, about real and newly
discovered facts. If you want to talk to me you'll have to
get real.
>
>> Simple minded dimwit!
>
>Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
>
[Hammond]
you didn't show anything, this one shows something:
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
And this:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
Unless you can address that in specific terms, in plain
English, you're just a worthless stumblebum with nothing to
say.
Jimbo
And through all of that, it still boils down to bullshit.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You wish.
Jimbo
Sorry, but it's simply bullshit.
M Otis Beard
giving in to my primal, animalistic panic by driving out of control
against the flow of traffic, I suddenly realized that the steering
wheel I was gripping with my sweaty white knuckles was CURVED!
Obviously, this curvature means that every single arbitrary, dogmatic
detail of the pantheism of the ancient Greeks is literally and
absolutely true. There is a mountain in the 8th dimension, and this
mountain is called 'Olympus.' The gods and goddesses live there and
wear togas and eat ambrosia (1 large tub Cool Whip, 20 cherries, 1
large can mixed fruit, any other fruit you would like, have fun with
it and add your favorite nut! Refrigerate for about 3-4 hours and
ENJOY). Sometimes they commit adultery with humans, and their divine
spouses get all cheesed off and go around turning people into
crocoducks. If you argue with me about any of this then you're a FOOL
who doesn't understand mathematics or science and you probably have
herpes, also Zeus is totally going to fuck you up with some badass
lightning bolts and shit.
Madge
wrote:
Well I think you're talking a whole load of Horsesh BZZZZT GAAAH
--
http://www.madge.tk Madges Links
http://twitter.com/MadgeTwits Yes IKNOW.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You wish.
Otto Bahn
> One day some loud teenagers in their car frightened me, and as I was
I blame Pandora. (That stuff about Eve and the apple
is just too damn original to be true.)
--oTTo--
George Hammond
<atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the steering wheel .. was CURVED!
>Obviously, this curvature means that every single arbitrary, dogmatic
>detail of the pantheism of the ancient Greeks is literally and
>absolutely true.
>
>
[Hammond]
I can tell you this Sarge. The ancient Greeks believed
that the were 12 different personality types and call them
the Olympian gods. Modern science (Psychometry) has
discovered that the structural model of personality is CUBIC
(Hammond, 1994). A cube has 13 symmetry axes and this is
why Factor Analysis in Psychometry always locates 13
personality eigenvectors.
So the ancient Greeks were 2500 years ahead of modern
science, they guessed 12 and the actual answer is 13. That's
92% mathematical accuracy, pretty good for 500 BC in my
opinion.
>
>
> this
>mountain is called 'Olympus.' The gods and goddesses live there
>
>
[Hammond]
Like I say sarge, modern science has now proven that they
were scientifically correct.
>
>
> If you argue with me about any of this then you're a FOOL
>who doesn't understand mathematics or science
>
>
[Hammond]
Not only do I have an advanced degree in science and
mathematics, I'm the one that has discovered and published
in the peer-reviewed literature that the ancient Greeks were
scientifically correct to 92% accuracy.
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You tell em Madge.
Otto Bahn
>>> >And through all of that, it still boils down to bullshit.
>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> You wish.
>>
>>
>>Sorry, but it's simply bullshit.
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> You wish.
Why would he wish for bullshit? Even if doesn't believe
in SPOG, you'd still think he'd *want* it to be true.
--oTTo--
M Otis Beard
>
> [Hammond]
> Not only do I have an advanced degree in science
"I have a Master's degree... in SCIENCE!"
M Otis Beard
> science, they guessed 12 and the actual answer is 13. That's
> 92% mathematical accuracy, pretty good for 500 BC in my
> opinion.
>
> were scientifically correct.
>
> mathematics, I'm the one that has discovered and published
> in the peer-reviewed literature that the ancient Greeks were
> scientifically correct to 92% accuracy.
SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13
LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S
THE POINT NOW?"
"NO COMMENT" SAYS OMNISCIENT OMNIPOTENT ANTHROPOMORPHIC CREATOR AND
RULER OF UNIVERSE
NIETZSCHE DUG UP AND TARRED, FEATHERED BY ANGRY MOB
Jimbo
LOL! That makes more sense than the what the op was spouting.
Jimbo
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:50:20 -0000, M Otis Beard <atomdeb...@gmail.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
True, but it did have the added feature of being humerous. :D
Bob Casanova
You have delusions of adequacy.
> do not
>speak any yuppie language such as "transference mode". We
>speak in simple universal poor man's English.
> Unlike you, I'm not a phony smart ass!
Nope, you're a genuine smartass.
> I got the courage
>to talk to people, any people, about real and newly
>discovered facts. If you want to talk to me you'll have to
>get real.
>>
>>> Simple minded dimwit!
>>
>>Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
>>
>[Hammond]
>you didn't show anything, this one shows something:
>http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
>And this:
>http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
>Unless you can address that in specific terms, in plain
>English, you're just a worthless stumblebum with nothing to
>say.
Sorry, but this...
"First, since gravity is real, God is real. Secondly,
tradition tells us that God is "supernatural" and we find
that Relativity explains the supernatural aspect of God.
Relativity is the only physical phenomena which causes a
'supernatural' effect on reality; reality being space and
time itself."
...contains *at least* 3 significant errors.
First, the existence of gravity implies nothing about the
existence of God. Gravity is a function of the curvature of
space-time.
Second, tradition is not evidence for anything (in a
scientific sense); evidence must be visible to all and not
rely on any particular system of belief (other than the
belief that reality is observable) to be considered
scientific.
Third, the supernatural is *by definition* outside the
purview of science, which addresses only observable
reality. Relativity is about observable reality;
supernatural entities are not.
Your beliefs don't constrain reality, nor do they constitute
evidence.
>========================================
>GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Primary site
>http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
>=======================================
John Stafford
<169ef0b0-4936-4eb9...@h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
M Otis Beard <atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
Soil Science.
Doctroid
<6e2d9092-7bad-4c94...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
M Otis Beard <atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13
>
> LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S
> THE POINT NOW?"
Your fatuous sarcasm is wholly inappropriate, Beard. As you would know
if you were even casually acquainted with recent results of string
theory, the predicted value (in a third order perturbative calculation)
of 92% of 13 is 11.93 +- 0.04, or nearly two standard deviations below
12, a discrepancy that has the potential to rock physics to its very
foundations if confirmed. The LHC should be able to provide a
measurement of 92% of 12 within its first three years with an error bar
of +- 0.06% if the damn birds stop dropping bread on it.
--
Sig available on request.
- Doctroid
Jimbo
> In article
> <6e2d9092-7bad-4c94-b470-2e9b3eda6...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
> M Otis Beard <atomdeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13
>
> > LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S
> > THE POINT NOW?"
>
> Your fatuous sarcasm is wholly inappropriate, Beard.
Actually, it was quite funny, and wholly appropriate.
M Otis Beard
GUILD OF CALAMITOUS INTENT INUNDATED WITH APPLICATIONS FROM
SUPERVILLIANS WANTING TO ARCH GEORGE HAMMOND
INTERROBANG CARTEL STORMS POP CHARTS WITH #1 HIT BASED ON SCIENTIFIC
PROOF OF GOD (http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3)
Bryce Utting
IFYPFY.
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
Its full name would then be Kublai Kahn Paw Paw Chow Chow Chow
Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Bjork Bjork Bjork Bjork
Bjork Bjork Bjork Bjork Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph
Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph Galump Galumph Galumph.
-- Gokmop introduces Fibonacci to Martha Stewart
George Hammond
[Hammond]
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
George Hammond
[Hammond]
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
M Otis Beard
>
> CURRICULUM VITAE
>
> GEORGE HAMMOND
Yes, I know who you are, Curious George.
I wonder how Richard Arnowitt feels about you discrediting him by
association like that.
All you prove by waving your Ph.D. around like a manic pirate with a
torn and faded jolly roger is that your religiosity is more likely to
be a product of mental illness than incompetence... or is it? Your
publishing credentials aren't very impressive, are they? I mean, ONE
paper in a soft-sciences journal almost sixteen years ago, and one in
a quasi-religious philosophy rag? I guess you weren't really much of
a physicist even before you started sucking the cosmic god-cock and
went insane.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You missed a few of the upcoming headlines:
VATICAN RECOGNIZES DISCOVERY OF SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
(Pontifical Academy of Sciences)
CHIEF RABBI OF JERASULEM AV BETH DIN PROCALIMS MIRACLE
ARCHBISHO OF CANTERBURY DECLARES SECOND COMING
DALI LAMA CALLS FOR WORLD ECUMENICAL UNIFICATION
TALIBAN DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ALLAH
REV WRIGHT DECLARES GOD LIVES IN AMERICA
HINDUS RENAME CASTE THE BICAMERAL/2-PARTY SYSTEM
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH SAYS I TOLD YOU SO
UNITED NATIONS ANNOUNCES OFFICAL END OF ANTISEMITISM
SUPREME COURT DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD MUST
BE TAUGHT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
U.S. CONGRESS OUTLAWS ATHEISM
RUSSIAN PALIAMENT ANNOUNCES FREEDOM OF RELIGION, CHINA TO
FOLLOW SUIT
M Otis Beard
>
> You missed a few of the upcoming headlines:
>
> VATICAN RECOGNIZES DISCOVERY OF SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> (Pontifical Academy of Sciences)
>
> CHIEF RABBI OF JERASULEM AV BETH DIN PROCALIMS MIRACLE
>
> ARCHBISHO OF CANTERBURY DECLARES SECOND COMING
>
> DALI LAMA CALLS FOR WORLD ECUMENICAL UNIFICATION
>
> TALIBAN DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ALLAH
>
> REV WRIGHT DECLARES GOD LIVES IN AMERICA
>
> HINDUS RENAME CASTE THE BICAMERAL/2-PARTY SYSTEM
>
> CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH SAYS I TOLD YOU SO
Substitute 'LIBERTY UNIVERSITY' for the Vatican, the Chief Rabbi, the
Archbisho [sic], the Dali Lama [sic], the Taliban, Rev Wright [sic],
and the Hindus, and it just might happen. Creationist turd-polishers
have a nasty habit of using almost any half-baked nonsense to claim
that science validates their irrational beliefs... it's only when
science contradicts them that they hide behind the argument that
science and religion occupy separate, non-overlapping domains.
On the other hand, you're probably too whacko-nutzoid even for them.
Maybe you could come up with some kind of mathematical proof that
medieval knights used dinosaurs as their steeds? I'm just sayin'.
> UNITED NATIONS ANNOUNCES OFFICAL END OF ANTISEMITISM
>
> SUPREME COURT DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD MUST
> BE TAUGHT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
>
> U.S. CONGRESS OUTLAWS ATHEISM
>
> RUSSIAN PALIAMENT ANNOUNCES FREEDOM OF RELIGION, CHINA TO
> FOLLOW SUIT
OK, now even if we pretend to believe you about your SPOG (and ignore
the bad spelling), this part is just so naïve that it couldn't
possibly have come from a sane mind over twelve years old. It's like
a tiny glimpse through your eyes, George... and what we see through
your eyes is a rollercoaster ride through Crazytown on a train made of
ego and powered by pure adrenaline.
The voices, do they torment you? Do they goad you on, insisting that
you spread your squidgy gospel far and wide in hopes of some reward?
Do they promise you a throne from which you can sit in judgment of
those who doubted you? You can tell me, George... I'm not like the
others. I'm your FRIEND.
George Hammond
> Doctroid
>
>
[Hammond]
The emergence of the Dodecahedron in western religion is
a very interesting because to any forensically minded
logical person its explanation is almost in and of itself a
confirmation of Hammons scientific proof of God.
The Egyptians were the first to discover the dodecahedron
pantheon of the gods. This of course are the 13 personality
types discovered by modern Psychometry. The high culture of
ancient Egypt discovered the Walt Disney approach 4500 years
ago. They drew pictures of a dozen animal headed men to
characterize these 12 personalities. Jackals, Cats,
alligators, Baboons, snakes, falcons, beetles were the
ancient versions of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Porky pig and
Bugs Bunny. There were about a dozen universally known
"gods" in the ancient Egyptian pantheon.
These gods were eventually taken over by the Greeks and
given typical human faces and renamed the Olympian gods.
Next a Roman's renamed the Greek dodecahedron with Latin
names, again about 12 of them, and this became the Roman
dodecahedron.
Of course throughout history no one except the highest
religious authority's in these places ever had any idea why
there were approximately 12 of them.
Then, in 1994 Hammond discovered that the cleavage of the
brain is actually CUBIC and that this causes a CUBIC
EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE in the factor analysis of personality
tests in Psychometry.
Simply put, a CUBE has 13 symmetry axes,and these become
the eigenvector locations when the principal axis extraction
is rotated to simple structure.
A 4500 year-old mystery is instantly solved. Sure enough
he published empirical data accurate to three significant
figures confirms the discovery. I publish this result in
1994 and you can read about it here;
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
and here:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
now that in itself is an amazing scientific discovery to
anyone with a scientific and logical mind. Why, when you
read even an educated person like Cicero during Roman times
wrote a book entitled "On the nature of the gods" and
listened to him agonize over where the gods are, and what
they are, you begin to realize what a historic problem has
been solved by modern science.
Of course there is an even more fabulous discovery. It
turns out when you factor the 13 gods ( the 13x13 matrix)
you get for higher-order factors which are higher order
personality descriptors and that turns out to be the
bicameral/2-party system and is also referred to as Matthew
Mark Luke and John by the theologians.
Finally, when you factor those four "gods" (the 4x4
matrix) you get ONE SINGLE LAST SUPREME EIGENVECTOR, and
that eigenvector turns out to be the God of the Bible, God!
Hence, not only is "God"explained by this discovery, but
the entire history of religion is explained as the slow
progression of discovery from the lower order eigenvectors
up the hierarchy to the final supreme single last
eigenvector.
In the face of this kind of evidence all proven to two
decimal point experimental accuracy and thoroughly
theoretically explain, how any self-respecting intellectual
or scientist could sit there and read it and deny that the
world's first scientific proof of God is discovered is of
course nothing but a ludicrous charade of ignorance.
George Hammond
<nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>Sorry, but this...
>
>"First, since gravity is real, God is real. Secondly,
>tradition tells us that God is "supernatural" and we find
>that Relativity explains the supernatural aspect of God.
>Relativity is the only physical phenomena which causes a
>'supernatural' effect on reality; reality being space and
>time itself."
>
>...contains *at least* 3 significant errors.
>
>First, the existence of gravity implies nothing about the
>existence of God. Gravity is a function of the curvature of
>space-time.
>
>
[Hammond]
Okay try and pay attention:
Gravity is a curvature of OBJECTIVE space time.
God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE space time .
Definition:
OBJECTIVE space time is measured relative to the clock on
the wall and a ruler.
SUBJECTIVE space time is what any given individual actually
sees.
Clearly objective space time is universal for all people.
And just as clearly subjective space time is different for
every individual. For instance a five-year-old kid sees a
larger and faster world than eight point-year-old adult. So
that is an example of how SUBJECTIVE SPACE TIME varies from
person to person.
So your first objection is immediately thrown out of court.
>
>
>
>Second, tradition is not evidence for anything (in a
>scientific sense); evidence must be visible to all and not
>rely on any particular system of belief (other than the
>belief that reality is observable) to be considered
>scientific.
>
[Hammond]
your second objection is rule of court as follows. We
assume the entire history of religion to be an
"unsubstantiated claim". And then we discover an actual
proven scientific phenomenon which turns out to predict that
precise claim in every exact detail! That is what is known
as a scientific proof of God.
So your second objection has been tossed out of court.
>
>
>
>Third, the supernatural is *by definition* outside the
>purview of science, which addresses only observable
>reality. Relativity is about observable reality;
>supernatural entities are not.
>Your beliefs don't constrain reality, nor do they constitute
>evidence.
>
>
[Hammond]
Wrong again Toynbee. Science claims that so-called
supernatural phenomena are simply phenomena for which the
scientific explanation HAS NOT YET been discovered. So
therefore I am simply pointing out that the previously
called "supernatural" phenomena of God actually has been
found to have a PROVEN experimentally measured and
theoretically known, scientific explanation.
So your third objection has now been rudely ejected from the
courtroom.
But don't go away mad, although your commentary is based
on elementary misconception of the theory, I am more than
impressed by your professional and polite demeanor which
indicates a significant ability, awareness, and above all
else serious motivation.
George Hammond
<atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 11, 7:49�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>
>> � � � � � CURRICULUM VITAE
>>
>> � � � � � � GEORGE HAMMOND
>
>
>Yes, I know who you are, Curious George.
>
>I wonder how Richard Arnowitt feels about you discrediting him by
>association like that.
>
[Hammond]
Richard Arnowitt is probably dead of old age for Christ's
sake. I'm 67 and he is at least 10 or 15 years older than
me.
I run into that problem all time, by the time the average
academic actually knows anything he's over 75 years old. For
instance the only world class authority in Factor Analysis
in Psychometry is Richard Gorsuch who is a professor in the
psychology department at Fuller theological seminary. I
talked to him once on the phone about 10 years ago before I
discovered the scientific proof of God and then I e-mailed
him about a year ago when I found out he was on the payroll
of Fuller theological seminary. For Christ's sake it took
him seven months to answer my e-mail and then he wanted to
know if my papers were in"e-mailable format". That after I
told him the URL of both papers in my original letter! For
Christ's sake, I don't have time to fool around with old
farts who are in their dotage!
>
>
>
>All you prove by waving your Ph.D. around like a manic pirate with a
>torn and faded jolly roger is that your religiosity is more likely to
>be a product of mental illness than incompetence... or is it? Your
>publishing credentials aren't very impressive, are they? I mean, ONE
>paper in a soft-sciences journal almost sixteen years ago, and one in
>a quasi-religious philosophy rag? I guess you weren't really much of
>a physicist even before you started sucking the cosmic god-cock and
>went insane.
>
>
>
[Hammond]
don't kid yourself Einstein. When you're looking at here
is a maverick scientist who was made a historic scientific
discovery ACCIDENTALLY. Naturally there is no one in
academia competent to talk to him. Moreover, they know that
I think they're a bunch of lazy treacherous and overpaid
windbags. The few who are competent enough to talk to me
already know who I am and I'm holding a royal straight flush
in spades and that if they talk to me it's as good as
writing their obituary notice academically speaking.
Wake up dimwit, I'm not competent, the establishment is.
George Hammond
<atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The voices, do they torment you? Do they goad you on, insisting that
>you spread your squidgy gospel far and wide in hopes of some reward?
>Do they promise you a throne from which you can sit in judgment of
>those who doubted you? You can tell me, George... I'm not like the
>others. I'm your FRIEND.
>
>
[Hammond]
Go fuck yourself you half assed middle class overstuffed
Flat-footed puke... your mouth is three times bigger than
your brain.
M Otis Beard
of:
>
> The emergence of the Dodecahedron in western religion is
> a very interesting because to any forensically minded
> logical person its explanation is almost in and of itself a
> confirmation of Hammons scientific proof of God.
> The Egyptians were the first to discover the dodecahedron
> pantheon of the gods. This of course are the 13 personality
> types discovered by modern Psychometry. The high culture of
> ancient Egypt discovered the Walt Disney approach 4500 years
> ago. They drew pictures of a dozen animal headed men to
> characterize these 12 personalities. Jackals, Cats,
> alligators, Baboons, snakes, falcons, beetles were the
> ancient versions of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Porky pig and
> Bugs Bunny. There were about a dozen universally known
> "gods" in the ancient Egyptian pantheon.
> These gods were eventually taken over by the Greeks and
> given typical human faces and renamed the Olympian gods.
> Next a Roman's renamed the Greek dodecahedron with Latin
> names, again about 12 of them, and this became the Roman
> dodecahedron.
Later we named the withered-headed hammond after him.
> Of course throughout history no one except the highest
> religious authority's in these places ever had any idea why
> there were approximately 12 of them.
> Then, in 1994 Hammond discovered that the cleavage of the
> brain is actually CUBIC and that this causes a CUBIC
> EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE in the factor analysis of personality
> tests in Psychometry.
Also, something something mumble mumble approximately twelve.
> Simply put, a CUBE has 13 symmetry axes,and these become
> the eigenvector locations when the principal axis extraction
> is rotated to simple structure.
> A 4500 year-old mystery is instantly solved. Sure enough
> now that in itself is an amazing scientific discovery to
pretend you made, but of course it means less than nothing to
> anyone with a scientific and logical mind. Why, when you
fap to the Land O'Lakes princess, God gets angry! Once I
> read even an educated person like Cicero during Roman times
would slam the ham occasionally. Between rubbing 'em out, he
> wrote a book entitled "On the nature of the gods" and
didn't include a single fap-worthy illustration, the bastard. We all
> listened to him agonize over where the gods are, and what
the best lube for attending church is. If priests are perverts, and
> they are, you begin to realize what a historic problem has
plagued altar boys from the very beginning, and never ever
> been solved by modern science.
I will never forget the day I discovered my Cubic's Rube.
> Of course there is an even more fabulous discovery. It
is in the blouse of the Land O'Lakes princess. Her blouse
> turns out when you factor the 13 gods ( the 13x13 matrix)
into the "approximately 12 = must be related" theory. What
> you get for higher-order factors which are higher order
are factors which are of an order that is higher. Scientology
> personality descriptors and that turns out to be the
peanut-butter-and-chocolate of crazy. My Rube set up a
> bicameral/2-party system and is also referred to as Matthew
Peepshow by the Indians. My Rube and blue balls are called
> Mark Luke and John by the theologians.
> Finally, when you factor those four "gods" (the 4x4
monster truck rally, Jerry, the Indian princess, and the Fleshlight
> matrix) you get ONE SINGLE LAST SUPREME EIGENVECTOR, and
if you then make a huge crazy leap from math to superstition,
> that eigenvector turns out to be the God of the Bible, God!
(Or as the Indian princess and I like to call Him, 'Pookie')
M Otis Beard
>
> Wake up dimwit, I'm not competent, the establishment is.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
<SNIP HECKLER>
<SNIP HECKLER>
Alan Ford
> You missed a few of the upcoming headlines:
You missed a few sub-headlines.
>
> VATICAN RECOGNIZES DISCOVERY OF SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> (Pontifical Academy of Sciences)
POPE SAYS HIGHEST BID ON VIRGIN MARY CHEESE SANDWICH BEST INVESTMENT YET
>
> CHIEF RABBI OF JERASULEM AV BETH DIN PROCALIMS MIRACLE
GOLDBERG'S PURCHASE OF DRINKS FOR FRIENDS HAILED AS ANOTHER CHANUKAH
>
> ARCHBISHO OF CANTERBURY DECLARES SECOND COMING
LADY OF CANTERBURY RELIEVED: "ENOUGH'S ENOUGH"
> DALI LAMA CALLS FOR WORLD ECUMENICAL UNIFICATION
REALIZES FORGOT TO CHARGE CELLPHONE, DROPS IDEA, GOES TO MOVIES
>
> TALIBAN DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ALLAH
DECLARES SIX MONTH BAN ON SEX, GOATS OVERJOYED
> REV WRIGHT DECLARES GOD LIVES IN AMERICA
BANK FORECLOSES ON HOUSE, DEPORTED BY DHS DUE TO ILLEGAL STATUS
> HINDUS RENAME CASTE THE BICAMERAL/2-PARTY SYSTEM
WHITER SKIN CASTE LABELED "ELITIST LIBERALS"
> CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH SAYS I TOLD YOU SO
GHOSTHUNTERS ANNOUNCE SPECIAL EPISODE OF "TALKING CHURCH"
> UNITED NATIONS ANNOUNCES OFFICAL END OF ANTISEMITISM
RESOLUTION IMMEDIATELY VETOED BY US AT ISRAEL'S REQUEST
> SUPREME COURT DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD MUST
> BE TAUGHT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
JUSTICES ALSO LEGALIZE WITCH HUNTS, SLAVERY, ALCHEMY AND BAN ELECTRICITY
>
> U.S. CONGRESS OUTLAWS ATHEISM
LAW DECLARED MEANINGLESS BY BOTH CIVIL WAR II PARTIES
> RUSSIAN PALIAMENT ANNOUNCES FREEDOM OF RELIGION, CHINA TO
> FOLLOW SUIT
ALL TEN CHINESE BELIEVERS GET DAY OFF FROM SWEATSHOP WORK
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
HAMMOND OFFICIALLY VOTED AMONG TOP TEN INTERNET LOONS, THANKS ADMIRERS
--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?
<SNIP HECKLER>
Yap
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:40:58 -0600, John Stafford
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article
> ><169ef0b0-4936-4eb9-8dce-5b9c80360...@h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
Wow, unimpressive .... your PhD (permanent head damage) led you
sideways.
No wonder you are onto the metaphysical business of nonsense.
<SNIP HECKLER>
Madge
wrote:
> On Nov 11, 10:30ï¿œpm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>
>> ￜ ￜWake up dimwit, I'm not competent, the establishment is.
>
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I wonder if he means legally competent. I think you missed out the BWA at
the start of that heckle.
--
http://www.madge.tk Madges Links
http://twitter.com/MadgeTwits Yes IKNOW.
Madge
> Message-ID: <81inf5tf64oe1cpue...@4ax.com>
Oh please don't make me come over there and teach/smack you.
Earlier message header
Madge
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:13:36 -0800 (PST), M Otis Beard
> <atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> The voices, do they torment you? Do they goad you on, insisting that
>> you spread your squidgy gospel far and wide in hopes of some reward?
>> Do they promise you a throne from which you can sit in judgment of
>> those who doubted you? You can tell me, George... I'm not like the
>> others. I'm your FRIEND.
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> Go fuck yourself you half assed middle class overstuffed
> Flat-footed puke... your mouth is three times bigger than
> your brain.
George, that's just a kneejerk reply. Put some spunk into it? Not for
fnarring by UKain readers
haiku jones
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:48 -0600, John Stafford
>
>
>
> <n...@droffats.net> wrote:
> >In article <mvpjf5dkae1ik964k9kuv9npke59mrq...@4ax.com>,
> > George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:03 -0600, John Stafford
> >> <n...@droffats.net> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9j5jiir2vi1j0jc...@4ax.com>,
> >> > George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> >> >> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> >> >> Windows for chrissakes!
>
> >> >OMG! You can't count, either!
> >> >WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
>
> >> [Hammond]
> >> Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
> >> the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
> >> guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
> >> immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
> >> Google, schmuck.
>
> >Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
>
> [Hammond]
> WRONG know nothing heckling dipshit. The scientific
> method means publishing your research in a peer-reviewed
> academic journal, which I have done:http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
And as did Alan Sokal.
Haiku Jones
> INTERNET communication is 90% about kicking kook ass,
> kooks like you. That's not science, that's informal
> criminologyand pro bono public service. Screw!
John Stafford
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:48 -0600, John Stafford
> > Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > � WRONG know nothing heckling dipshit. �The scientific
> > method means publishing your research in a peer-reviewed
> > academic journal, which I have done:http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
The Cartesian theory: Unification of Eysenck and Gray
George E. Hammond
Massachusetts Department of Mental Health,
78 Pleasant Street, Hyannis, MA 02601
U.S.A.
Bob Casanova
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
<Nowh...@notspam.net>:
>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:35:01 -0700, Bob Casanova
><nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Sorry, but this...
>>
>>"First, since gravity is real, God is real. Secondly,
>>tradition tells us that God is "supernatural" and we find
>>that Relativity explains the supernatural aspect of God.
>>Relativity is the only physical phenomena which causes a
>>'supernatural' effect on reality; reality being space and
>>time itself."
>>
>>...contains *at least* 3 significant errors.
>>
>>First, the existence of gravity implies nothing about the
>>existence of God. Gravity is a function of the curvature of
>>space-time.
>[Hammond]
> Okay try and pay attention:
>
>Gravity is a curvature of OBJECTIVE space time.
Correct.
>God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE space time .
This is meaningless handwaving, of exactly as much value as
"The snark is a boojum", and exactly as testable by science.
>Definition:
>
>OBJECTIVE space time is measured relative to the clock on
>the wall and a ruler.
>
>SUBJECTIVE space time is what any given individual actually
>sees.
>
>Clearly objective space time is universal for all people.
>And just as clearly subjective space time is different for
>every individual. For instance a five-year-old kid sees a
>larger and faster world than eight point-year-old adult. So
>that is an example of how SUBJECTIVE SPACE TIME varies from
>person to person.
This is a matter of psychology, and has zero to do with
physics.
>So your first objection is immediately thrown out of court.
So your handwaving is rejected.
>>Second, tradition is not evidence for anything (in a
>>scientific sense); evidence must be visible to all and not
>>rely on any particular system of belief (other than the
>>belief that reality is observable) to be considered
>>scientific.
>[Hammond]
>your second objection is rule of court as follows. We
>assume the entire history of religion to be an
>"unsubstantiated claim". And then we discover an actual
>proven scientific phenomenon which turns out to predict that
>precise claim in every exact detail! That is what is known
>as a scientific proof of God.
There is no such phenomenon, since all religions are
mutually contradictory and all religious writings are
allegory and metaphor, not science texts.
>So your second objection has been tossed out of court.
So your second "explanation" is rejected as more
unsubstantiated handwaving.
>>Third, the supernatural is *by definition* outside the
>>purview of science, which addresses only observable
>>reality. Relativity is about observable reality;
>>supernatural entities are not.
>>Your beliefs don't constrain reality, nor do they constitute
>>evidence.
>>
>>
>[Hammond]
> Wrong again Toynbee. Science claims that so-called
>supernatural phenomena are simply phenomena for which the
>scientific explanation HAS NOT YET been discovered.
Nope. Science categorically rejects evaluation of
"supernatural" phenomena, since none has been shown to exist
outside the minds of proponents. Physical phenomena can be
evaluated, but until they are observable *by a disinterested
observer* science will not and cannot address them.
> So
>therefore I am simply pointing out that the previously
>called "supernatural" phenomena of God actually has been
>found to have a PROVEN experimentally measured and
>theoretically known, scientific explanation.
Your "proof" doesn't seem to exist except in your mind, and
no amount of handwaving can change that. You have
demonstrated nothing but an ability to conjecture and define
an unobserved phenomenon, then "prove" its existence by
first assuming it exists; IOW by assuming the consequent,
or, if you prefer, by circular logic.
>So your third objection has now been rudely ejected from the
>courtroom.
So your third "explanation" is summarily rejected for faulty
logic and poor science.
> But don't go away mad,
Never fear; errors in the conception of what "science"
actually means isn't something which generates anger in the
observer.
> although your commentary is based
>on elementary misconception of the theory,
You have no theory, which in science is an explanation of at
least one, and usually several, tested and unrefuted
hypotheses. You have a conjecture which you're unable to
support with evidence; IOW, you have a personal belief.
Sorry 'bout that.
> I am more than
>impressed by your professional and polite demeanor which
>indicates a significant ability, awareness, and above all
>else serious motivation.
>========================================
>GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Primary site
>http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
>=======================================
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Never heard of him. How is he relevant to this discussion?
>
>
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Sorry that isn't my address. That's the address of an
office of the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health in
Hyannis, go ahead and stalk them Stafford, you'll find
yourself talking to the State Police in five minutes flat.
haiku jones
> Never heard of him.
Really! I'm a bit startled by that.
> How is he relevant to this discussion?
Oh, just another physicist who published
a paper in a peer-reviewed humanities
journal. His was titled "Transgressing the
Boundaries: Toward a Transformative
Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity."
It was quite...interesting. For reasons
having nothing to do with physics, and
everything to do with the validation, or
lack thereof, of getting published in
a peer-reviewed humanities journal.
You could, as Casey Stengel
observed, look it up.
> >
> >
George Hammond
<deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:41:56 -0000, M Otis Beard <atomd...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Nov 11, 10:30�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> � �Wake up dimwit, I'm not incompetent, the establishment is.
>>
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>I wonder if he means legally competent. I think you missed out the BWA at
>the start of that heckle.
>
[Hammond]
Don't invite hecklers. I'm not here to carry on off-topic
discussion.
George Hammond
<deletethisbit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>George, that's just a kneejerk reply. Put some spunk into it? Not for
>fnarring by UKain readers
>
>
[Hammond]
Look Madge, 90% of USENET is populated with criminal
hecklers. By posting off-topic which includes everything
you've posted to this discussion, you're just contributing
to the problem.
Olrik
I see that your sense of humour is as impaired as your "theories".
Olrik
George Hammond
<nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:43:02 -0800, the following appeared
>in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
><Nowh...@notspam.net>:
>
>>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:35:01 -0700, Bob Casanova
>><nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Sorry, but this...
>>>
>>>"First, since gravity is real, God is real. Secondly,
>>>tradition tells us that God is "supernatural" and we find
>>>that Relativity explains the supernatural aspect of God.
>>>Relativity is the only physical phenomena which causes a
>>>'supernatural' effect on reality; reality being space and
>>>time itself."
>>>
>>>...contains *at least* 3 significant errors.
>>>
>>>First, the existence of gravity implies nothing about the
>>>existence of God. Gravity is a function of the curvature of
>>>space-time.
>
>>[Hammond]
>> Okay try and pay attention:
>>
>>Gravity is a curvature of OBJECTIVE space time.
>
>Correct.
>
>>God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE space time .
>
>This is meaningless handwaving, of exactly as much value as
>"The snark is a boojum", and exactly as testable by science.
>
>
[Hammond]
WRONG aggravated ignoramus. A person's SUBJECTIVE time
is measured by his mental speed in bits per second (e.g.
intelligence,or aka IQ). A person SUBJECTIVE space is
measured by his body size (foot size traditionally, for
instance).
The SUBJECTIVE space time of a five-year-old is BIGGER AND
FASTER than the subject of space-time of a 20-year-old, and
that is measurable to two decimal point accuracy!
Another example, for the really mentally challenged like
you---- when a cop gives you a roadside sobriety test he is
comparing your SUBJECTIVE space time to OBJECTIVE space
time. If he doesn't think they match up, you get arrested
for driving under the influence.
Look asshole, you can sit there all day heckling me and
calling me names but that doesn't mean a f---in thing if you
can't argue competent logic and simple facts.
>
>
>>Definition:
>>
>>OBJECTIVE space time is measured relative to the clock on
>>the wall and a ruler.
>>
>>SUBJECTIVE space time is what any given individual actually
>>sees.
>>
>>Clearly objective space time is universal for all people.
>>And just as clearly subjective space time is different for
>>every individual. For instance a five-year-old kid sees a
>>larger and faster world than eight point-year-old adult. So
>>that is an example of how SUBJECTIVE SPACE TIME varies from
>>person to person.
>
>This is a matter of psychology, and has zero to do with
>physics.
>
>
[Hammond]
WRONG AGAIN ASSHOLE. It is known as the ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
in theoretical physics and is accepted as scientific fact by
the entire field of science.
>
>
>>So your first objection is immediately thrown out of court.
>
>So your handwaving is rejected.
>
[Hammond]
No, you're ignorant and your unfactually based heckling
response is rejected!
>
>
>>>Second, tradition is not evidence for anything (in a
>>>scientific sense); evidence must be visible to all and not
>>>rely on any particular system of belief (other than the
>>>belief that reality is observable) to be considered
>>>scientific.
>
>>[Hammond]
>>your second objection is rule of court as follows. We
>>assume the entire history of religion to be an
>>"unsubstantiated claim". And then we discover an actual
>>proven scientific phenomenon which turns out to predict that
>>precise claim in every exact detail! That is what is known
>>as a scientific proof of God.
>
>There is no such phenomenon, since all religions are
>mutually contradictory and all religious writings are
>allegory and metaphor, not science texts.
>
>
[Hammond]
Again you're full of shit. Every major religion in the
world de facto defines God as:
UNIVERSAL DEFINITION OF GOD
"An invisible all powerful man who lives in the sky and
rules the world and controls the fate and destiny of Man".
And that is exactly what my published scientific proof of
God PROVES TO BE TRUE.
>
>
<SNIP REST OF AMATEUR ARGUMENTATIVE HORSESHIT>
>
>
[HAMMOND]
If you cannot answer the above rebuttal in some kind of
coherent and logical quasi scientific terms, you're just
another half ass heckler with nothing to say.
GET REAL!!!!!!!!!!
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Well, I do know that least once a day I find myself
laughing so hard and so long that my sides actually hurt.
George Hammond
<575j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>George Hammond wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:09:28 -0800 (PST), haiku jones
>> <575j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Nov 10, 4:28?pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:48 -0600, John Stafford
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> <n...@droffats.net> wrote:
>> >> >In article <mvpjf5dkae1ik964k9kuv9npke59mrq...@4ax.com>,
>> >> > George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:03 -0600, John Stafford
>> >> >> <n...@droffats.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> >In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9j5jiir2vi1j0jc...@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> > George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> >> ? ?Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! ?That's almost the size of
>> >> >> >> Windows for chrissakes!
>> >>
>> >> >> >OMG! You can't count, either!
>> >> >> >WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
>> >>
>> >> >> [Hammond]
>> >> >> ? ?Thanks for the information gopher. ?I had no idea what
>> >> >> the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
>> >> >> guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
>> >> >> immediately give us the right answer. ?Its easier than
>> >> >> Google, schmuck.
>> >>
>> >> >Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
>> >>
>> >> [Hammond]
>> >> ? WRONG know nothing heckling dipshit. ?The scientific
>> >> method means publishing your research in a peer-reviewed
>> >> academic journal, which I have done:
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
>> >
>> >And as did Alan Sokal.
>> >Haiku Jones
>> >
>> >
>> [Hammond]
>
>> Never heard of him.
>
>Really! I'm a bit startled by that.
>
>
>> How is he relevant to this discussion?
>
>Oh, just another physicist who published
>a paper in a peer-reviewed humanities
>journal. His was titled "Transgressing the
>Boundaries: Toward a Transformative
>Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity."
>
>It was quite...interesting. For reasons
>having nothing to do with physics, and
>everything to do with the validation, or
>lack thereof, of getting published in
>a peer-reviewed humanities journal.
>
>You could, as Casey Stengel
>observed, look it up.
>
>
[Hammond]
Obviously Alan Sokall wouldn't know God from a pair of
contact lenses, so he is of no relevance to this discussion.
Madge
wrote:
Criminal? Ay! Then I'm the man for the job.
http://home.btconnect.com/kibo/madgeatwork.jpg