I'm back on the newsgroups.
John Winston
after being off since 12-12-2008 dur to computer problems.
John Winston. joh...@mlode.com
Subject: Is Laden Alive Or Not. Dec. 31, 2009.
Here is some information from a person who claims to
know something about Osama Bin Laden. It's very rough
language so you might not want to read it if you think
everything is going OK.
......................................................
......................................................
Subject: Osama Bin Laden has been d-ad since shortly
after 9/11
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009
Only those who get their 'news' from the major towers
of d-ception and p-opaganda still beLIEve that Osama
Bin Laden is alive and well...
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24157.htm
Years Of D-ceit: US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long De-d
By Gordon D-ff
Senior Editor
December 10 2009 "Veterans Today" -- Conservative
commentator former M-rine Colonel Bob P-ppas has been
saying for years that bin Laden die- at Tora Bora and
that Senator K-rry's claim that bin Laden escaped with
Bush help was a l-e. Now we know that Pa-pas was
correct. The embarassment of having Secretary of State
C-inton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific.
He has been -ead since December 13 2001 and now
finally everyone O-ama M-Chrystal C-eney everyone who
isn't n-ts is finally saying what they have known for
years.
However since we lost a couple of hundred of our top
special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after
we knew he was d-ad is someone going to answer for this
with some j-il time? Since we spent 200 million dollars
on "special ops" looking for someone we knew was de-d
who is going to ja-l for that? Since B-sh R-msfeld and
Ch-ney continually talked about a man they knew was
de-d now known to be for reasons of P-LITICAL nature
[EXPEDIENCY!] who is going to jai- for that? Why were
tapes brought out now known to be forged as legitimate
intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the
US? This is a c-iminal act if there ever was one.
In 66 pages General Stanley McC-rystal never mentions
Osama bin Laden. Everything is "Mullah Omar" now. In
his talk at West P-int P-esident Oba-a never mentioned
Osama bin Laden. Col. Pap-as makes it clear Vice
Pr-sident Che-ey let it "out of the bag" long ago. Bin
Laden was ki-led by American troops many many years
ago.
America knew Osama bin Laden di-d December 13 2001.
After that his use was hardly one to unite A-erica but
rather one to divide scam and play games. With bin
Laden gone we could have started legitimate nation
building in Afghanistan instead of the eternal
insurgency that we invented ourselves.
Without our ill informed po-icies we could have had a
brought diplomatic solution in 2002 in Afghanistan the
one we are ignoring now and spent money rebuilding the
country 5 cents on the dollar compared to what we are
spending fighting a wa- against an enemy we ourselves
recruited thru ignorance.
The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts
ever perpetrated against the American people. We don't
even know if he really was an enemy certainly he was
never the person that Bus- and Chene- said. In fact the
B-sh and bin Laden families were always close friends
and had been for many years.
What kind of man was Osama bin Laden? This one time
American ally against Russia son of a wealthy Saudi
family went to Afghanistan to help them fight for their
freedom. Am-rica saw him as a great hero then.
Transcripts of the real bin Laden show him to be much
more moderate than we claim angry at Israel and the US
gov-rnment but showing no anger toward Americans and
never making the kind of theats claimed. All of this is
public record for any with the will to learn.
How much of Amer-ca's tragedy is tied with these two
children of the rich children of families long joined
thru money and friendship the B-sh and bin Laden clans.
One son died in remote mountains another lives in a
Dallas suburb hoping nobody is sent after him. One is a
combat veteran one never took a strong stand unless
done from safety and comfort. Islam once saw bin Laden
as a great leader. Now he is mostly forgotten.
What has Ame-ica decided about Bu-h?
We know this: Bin Laden always denied any ties to 9/11
and in fact has never been charged in relation to 9/11.
He not only denied involvement but had done so while
alive 4 times and had vigorously condemned those who
were involved in the attack.
This is on the public record public in every free
country except ours. We instead showed films made by
paid actors made up to look somewhat similar to bin
Laden actors who contradicted bin Ladens very public
statements actors pretending to be bin Laden long after
bin Laden's de-th.
These were done to help justify spending repressive
laws t-rture and simple t-ievery.
For years we attacked the gov-rnment of Pakistan for
not hunting down someone everyone knew was dea-. Bin
Laden's d-ath hit the newspapers in Pakistan on
December 15 2001. How do you think our ally felt when
they were continually berated for failing to hunt down
and turn over someone who didn't exist?
What do you think this did for Americ-n credibility in
Pakistan and thru the Islamic world? Were we seen as
crim-nals li-rs or simply f-ols? Which one is best?
This is also t-eason.
How does the de-th of bin Laden and the defeat and
dismemberment of Al Qaeda impact the intelligence
assessments partially based on not only bin Laden but
Al Qaeda activity in Iraq that not only never happened
but was now known to have been unable to happen?
How many "P-ntagon P-ndits" the retired officers who
sold their honor to send us to -ar for what is now
known to be domestic po-itical dirty tricks and not
national se-urity are culpable in these c-imes?
I don't always agree with Col. Pa-pas on things. I
believe his po-itics overrule his judgement at times.
However we totally agree on bin Laden simply disagree
with what it means. To me ly-ng and sending men to
their dea-hs based on l-es is tr-ason.
Falsifying m-litary i-telligence and spending billions
on unnecessary milit-ry operations for poli-ical
reasons is an a-omination. Consider this giving
billions in contracts to G-P friends who fill campaign
coffers and doing so based on falsified intelligence is
i-sane. This was done for years.
We spent 8 years chasing a d-ad man spending billions
sending F-I agents the C-A Navy Seals M-rine Force
Recon Special Forces many to their -eaths as part of a
pol-tical campaign to justify running Am-rican into
debt enriching a pack of pol-tical c-onies and -ar
profiteers and to puff up a pack of Pen-agon pea-ocks
and their Whitehouse draft dodging bosses.
How many laws were pushed thru because of a dea- man?
How many hundreds were t-rtured to find a de-d man?
How many hundreds d-ed looking for a dea- man?
How many billions were spent looking for a d-ad man?
Every time B-sh C-eney and R-msfeld stood before troops
and talked about hunting down the dea- bin Laden it was
a d-shonor. L-ing to men and women who put their lives
on the line is not a joke.
Who is going to answer to the families of those who
d-ed for the po-itics and profit tied to the Hunt for
Bin Laden?
Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Du-f is a Ma-ine
combat veteran and regular contributor on poli-ical and
social issues.
John Winston. joh...@mlode.com
Dr. HotSalt
> Dear Kibo and other folks. I'm now back on the newsgroups
> after being off since 12-12-2008 dur to computer problems.
> John Winston. joh...@mlode.com
Welcome back, Jo-n.
> Subject: Is Laden Alive Or Not. Dec. 31, 2009.
>
> Here is some information from a person who claims to
> know something about Osama Bin Laden. It's very rough
> language so you might not want to read it if you think
> everything is going OK.
>
> ......................................................
> ......................................................
>
> Subject: Osama Bin Laden has been d-ad since shortly
> after 9/11
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009
>
> Only those who get their 'news' from the major towers
> of d-ception and p-opaganda still beLIEve that Osama
> Bin Laden is alive and well...http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24157.htm
> Years Of D-ceit: US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long De-d
> By Gordon D-ff
> Senior Editor
> December 10 2009 "Veterans Today" -- Conservative
> commentator former M-rine Colonel Bob P-ppas has been
> saying for years that bin Laden die- at Tora Bora and
> that Senator K-rry's claim that bin Laden escaped with
> Bush help was a l-e.
*
*
*
> Who is going to answer to the families of those who
> d-ed for the po-itics and profit tied to the Hunt for
> Bin Laden?
Nobody. When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
impeach Clinton, did they? Neither Clinton ever answered for what they
did in Arkansas, did they? Despite the Demonicans being in total
power, have they made any noise about impeaching Bush since the
election? No. Why not? All politicians are the same; all evil thieves
and monsters that protect each other.
Dr. HotSalt
David DeLaney
>On Jan 2, 11:15�pm, "John Winston" <joh...@mlode.com> wrote:
>> Dear Kibo and other folks. I'm now back on the newsgroups
>> after being off since 12-12-2008 dur to computer problems.
yaaaaaay!
> Welcome back, Jo-n.
And here's hoping your computer no more says "dur!".
> Nobody. When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
>impeach Clinton, did they?
They did try. It just didn't, like, work, partly because they decided to
impeach him for something that had nothing to do with legal corruption,
previous corruption, governorship corruption, treason, aiding and/or abetting
an enemy, or selling sekrits to the commies.
>Despite the Demonicans being in total
>power, have they made any noise about impeaching Bush since the
>election? No. Why not? All politicians are the same; all evil thieves
>and monsters that protect each other.
...On the other hand, I do note that if WE don't impeach BUSH, we've got
something to hold over the heads of the Republican party _forever_. Or as
long as they last, anyway. Which may not be that much longer...
Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
Mark
> Neither Clinton ever answered for what they
> did in Arkansas, did they?
What happens in Arkansas stays in Arkansas,
especially if it involves farm animals.
--
Mark
Mark Edwards
>Dear Kibo and other folks. I'm now back on the newsgroups
>after being off since 12-12-2008
Yay! J-hn W-ns-on is back! Welcome back, John!
Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request
Doctroid
<a87a6d26-5875-498e...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
"Dr. HotSalt" <alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nobody. When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
> impeach Clinton, did they?
On my planet they did.
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/20/us/impeachment-the-president-clinton-im
peached-president-digs-in.html
> Neither Clinton ever answered for what they did in Arkansas, did they?
But not for that -- whatever that was; there's not much reason to answer
for a crime when no crime is proved, is there?
> Despite the Demonicans being in total
> power, have they made any noise about impeaching Bush since the
> election? No. Why not?
Because we'd have to re-elect him first, and that would require both a
constitutional amendment and free lobotomies for all voters?
(Unless IHBT, you need to check your nonsense about what impeachment is
before posting it to ark.)
> All politicians are the same;
It's convenient to think so, if you aren't interested in truth.
> all evil thieves and monsters that protect each other.
for values of "all" that are on the small side.
--
Sig available on request.
- Doctroid
Mark Edwards
"Dr. HotSalt" <alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> all evil thieves and monsters that protect each other.
No cluons were harmed when Doctroid wrote:
>for values of "all" that are on the dark side.
IFYPFY.
Dr. HotSalt
> [politicians]
>
> "Dr. HotSalt" <alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> all evil thieves and monsters that protect each other.
>
> No cluons were harmed when Doctroid wrote:
>
>
> IFYPFY.
IFYFHPFY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8tFk3ZPWtU
Dr. Hot"kinda dull around here lately"Salt
Talysman the Ur-Beatle
> In article
> <a87a6d26-5875-498e-85f7-6ff09aea9...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dr. HotSalt" <alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Despite the Demonicans being in total
> > power, have they made any noise about impeaching Bush since the
> > election? No. Why not?
>
> Because we'd have to re-elect him first, and that would require both a
> constitutional amendment and free lobotomies for all voters?
>
> (Unless IHBT, you need to check your nonsense about what impeachment is
> before posting it to ark.)
You can impeach someone after they've left office. The only effect
(if found guilty) is that it removes their pension, plus jail time/
fines, if applicable to the crime. However, since Bush is out of
office and the Democrats didn't really care about *what* he was doing,
only that he was doing it without their consent, no one wants to
bother. The public would probably look at it as wasteful, anyways.
bar...@bookpro.com
It would backfire badly on the Democrats, so it would be wasteful of
such little political capital as they have, as well as of time and
money. Bush is no longer a political force, as far as I can tell, and
trying to slap him on the wrist for past actions wouldn't accomplish
anything worth accomplishing.
Too bad no one can get Dick Cheney to STFU, though.
BW
Matthew L. Martin
Ahh. Darth Cheney. He was the real reason Democrats decided not to
impeach GW.
Matthew
--
I have two and 1/2 granddaughters:
Alex will find a way to silently get from where she is to where she
wants to be.
Anna will make an Anna sized hole between where she is to where she
wants to be.
Matthew L. Martin
> In article
> <a87a6d26-5875-498e...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dr. HotSalt" <alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nobody. When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
>> impeach Clinton, did they?
>
> On my planet they did.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/20/us/impeachment-the-president-clinton-im
> peached-president-digs-in.html
>
> or http://tinyurl.com/yzfkt6y
Not even a bare majority of Republicans were willing to impeach Clinton
for getting a BJ without a steak and not be willing to admit to it. I
think they were certain that a future Republican President would be
impeached and convicted of jaywalking.
>> Neither Clinton ever answered for what they did in Arkansas, did they?
>
> But not for that -- whatever that was; there's not much reason to answer
> for a crime when no crime is proved, is there?
We (US taxpayers) paid over $28 million to prove that there was enough
evidence to indict, much less convict, over any of the Arkansas
allegations. A good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. Starr is an
excellent prosecutor.
>> Despite the Demonicans being in total
>> power, have they made any noise about impeaching Bush since the
>> election? No. Why not?
>
> Because we'd have to re-elect him first, and that would require both a
> constitutional amendment and free lobotomies for all voters?
I believe that would be a second lobotomy, as we did elect him the first
time in 2004.
> (Unless IHBT, you need to check your nonsense about what impeachment is
> before posting it to ark.)
>
>> All politicians are the same;
>
> It's convenient to think so, if you aren't interested in truth.
Truth in politics beliefs? What an novel idea.
>> all evil thieves and monsters that protect each other.
>
> for values of "all" that are on the small side.
As much as I disagreed with virtually everything GW did, I never
considered him evil. Darth Cheney, that's different.
Jared
> No cluons were harmed when John Winston wrote:
>
> >Dear Kibo and other folks. I'm now back on the newsgroups
> >after being off since 12-12-2008
>
> Yay! J-hn W-ns-on is back! Welcome back, John!
>
> Mark Edwards
What is the reason for the "-"es? Is it a clever subterfuge to prevent
search engines from indexing words by redacting them at random?
Dr. HotSalt
It's a sekrit code. Ask Leo.
Say, where the hell *is* Leo, anyway?
Dr. HotSalt
Nicko
something else when he wrote:
> When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
> impeach Clinton, did they?
Well, yes, they did.
They did not convict him or forcibly remove him from office (none of
the charges got past the Senate), but he was most definitely
impeached.
--
YOP...
Nicko
Good question.
Last I heard from him, in June, he was still in St. Louis, and
bitching (rather lucidly, I might add) about his AT&T service.
--
YOP...
Doctroid
"Matthew L. Martin" <not...@notnow.never> wrote:
> Doctroid wrote:
> > In article
> > <a87a6d26-5875-498e...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Dr. HotSalt" <alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Nobody. When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
> >> impeach Clinton, did they?
> >
> > On my planet they did.
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/20/us/impeachment-the-president-clinton-im
> > peached-president-digs-in.html
> >
> > or http://tinyurl.com/yzfkt6y
>
> Not even a bare majority of Republicans were willing to impeach Clinton
> for getting a BJ without a steak and not be willing to admit to it.
They were and they did. See the link.
Doctroid
<4c4734d9-6fcb-449f...@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
Talysman the Ur-Beatle <taly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can impeach someone after they've left office. The only effect
> (if found guilty) is that it removes their pension, plus jail time/
> fines, if applicable to the crime.
You sure about that? I'm willing to believe the bit about the pension,
but an impeachment trial is not a criminal trial; I don't buy the part
about jail time and fines. Not that I've checked my own nonsense.
Glenn Knickerbocker
>On Jan 4, 8:35�am, Mark Edwards <Mark-Edwa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> [politicians]
>> "Dr. HotSalt" <alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> all evil thieves and monsters that protect each other.
>> No cluons were harmed when Doctroid wrote:
>> IFYPFY.
>IFYFHPFY
IFYFHFHPF Jane Elliott.
�R http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/dreams.poems.html
I'd rather learn from one bird how to sing e. e. cummings, from
than teach ten thousand stars how not to dance Collected Poems
Glenn Knickerbocker
>On Jan 4, 7:16�pm, "Dr. HotSalt" <alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Good question.
Fairly active on Facebook, actually.
http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/bluemoon.html / I haven't laughed
�R / so hard since I was waiting to see 'The Aristocrats!' --Cam
Matthew L. Martin
> In article <Lqv0n.563$V_3...@newsfe09.iad>,
> "Matthew L. Martin" <not...@notnow.never> wrote:
>
>> Doctroid wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <a87a6d26-5875-498e...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>>> "Dr. HotSalt" <alie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nobody. When the Repugnicrats were in power they didn't actually
>>>> impeach Clinton, did they?
>>> On my planet they did.
>>>
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/20/us/impeachment-the-president-clinton-im
>>> peached-president-digs-in.html
>>>
>>> or http://tinyurl.com/yzfkt6y
>
> They were and they did. See the link.
>
IFMPFM.
Doctroid
"Matthew L. Martin" <not...@notnow.never> wrote:
> IFMPFM.
My work here is... naaah.
Otto Bahn
>> You can impeach someone after they've left office. The only effect
>> (if found guilty) is that it removes their pension, plus jail time/
>> fines, if applicable to the crime.
>
> You sure about that? I'm willing to believe the bit about the pension,
> but an impeachment trial is not a criminal trial; I don't buy the part
> about jail time and fines. Not that I've checked my own nonsense.
oTTo reaches into the Obvious Bag and reveals:
"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to
removal from Office,"
Congress does have some judicial powers and impeached persons are
subject to further criminal trials, but impeachment itself does not
do that.
--oTTo--
Otto Bahn
>>Dear Kibo and other folks. I'm now back on the newsgroups
>>after being off since 12-12-2008
>
> Yay! J-hn W-ns-on is back! Welcome back, John!
...To that same old place that you laughed about.
Somewhere along the way Travolta learned how to be
an actor.
--oTTo--
Shelly
news:hhvph9$m1c$1...@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu...
> Somewhere along the way Travolta learned how to be
> an actor.
Chachi's mom? IDTS!
--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net/blog
Adam Funk
> Dear Kibo and other folks. I'm now back on the newsgroups
> after being off since 12-12-2008 dur to computer problems.
> John Winston. joh...@mlode.com
We-come b-ck!
--
Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results,
but that's not why we do it. [Richard Feynman]
Tiger Would
> Here is some information from a person who claims to
> know something about Osama Bin Laden.
Three thousand people were minding their own business.
Women, children, friendly Americans. Then the WORLD TRADE
CENTER towers crashed and slammed to the ground in a FIRE
of MURDER by coward muslims.
Now...We're gonna KILL YOU motherfuckers if it takes 100
years. Because we're AMERICANS. We are the top dogs of
the world. And the muslims are gonna pay one million times
over if we have to kill every fucking one of you.
*Locked and loaded, Mark*
--
FOR SALE !! http://tr.im/1f7k
Mark Edwards
>the muslims are gonna pay one million times
>over if we have to kill every fucking one of you.
I dunno. Maybe if we just tickle them until they throw up.
technomaNge
> No cluons were harmed when Tiger Would wrote:
>> the muslims are gonna pay one million times
>> over if we have to kill every fucking one of you.
>
>
>
> Mark Edwards
IFYPFY.
technomaNge
--
also, samsung.
Mark
Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim
propaganda post here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
If you put ten, I'll put a hundred. If you put a hundred,
I'll put a thousand. So tell your sandnigger friends they're
responsible for the ANTI campaign that follows.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Mark Edwards
>Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim propaganda post
> here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
Offering to tickle muslims until they vomit is propaganda? I want some of
what you're smoking.
Dr. HotSalt
> Mark Edwards wrote:
> > No cluons were harmed when Tiger Would wrote:
> >> the muslims are gonna pay one million times
> >> over if we have to kill every fucking one of you.
>
>
> > Mark Edwards
>
> IFYPFY.
>
> technomaNge
> --
> also, samsung.
IFYFHPFY.
Also also, Samwise.
Dr. HotSalt
Bryce Utting
> Mark wrote:
>>Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim propaganda post
>> here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
>
> Offering to tickle muslims until they vomit is propaganda? I want some of
> what you're smoking.
innocent (well, mostly innocent) (well, sorta innocent) question:
isn't he one of the bozos who's already flooding the group with 10
posts per one of content?
butting
Dr. HotSalt
One of him is a nym-switching stalkerizing troll. The other, not so
much.
Dr. HotSalt
Matthew L. Martin
>
IFYPFY
Matthew (we are all Bozos on this bus)
Otto Bahn
>>>> Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim propaganda post
>>>> here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
>>> Offering to tickle muslims until they vomit is propaganda? I want some
>>> of what you're smoking.
>>
>> innocent (well, mostly innocent) (well, sorta innocent) question:
>> isn't he one of the bozos who's already flooding the group with 10
>> posts per one of content like everyone else?
>>
>
> IFYPFY
>
> Matthew (we are all Bozos on this bus)
Speak for yourself. This Bozo drives solo.
--oTTo--
David DeLaney
Sort of. There's the Mark above, who's Just New and hasn't adjusted to us
completely yet, and there's the *Mark who's forging headers to look like he's
Mark but is actually posting from x-privat.org or some such, and who hasn't
been here in the last few days from where I see things.
So make it about 3 to 1 and he does fit...
Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
David DeLaney
>Sort of. There's the Mark above, who's Just New and hasn't adjusted to us
>completely yet, and there's the *Mark who's forging headers to look like he's
>Mark but is actually posting from x-privat.org or some such, and who hasn't
>been here in the last few days from where I see things.
Oops, never mind, there he was again further down the thread. If only we could
use the Death Ray for GOOD instead of for Wacky...
Shelly
"David DeLaney" <d...@gatekeeper.vic.com> wrote in message
news:slrnhka45...@gatekeeper.vic.com...
> Bryce Utting <but...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
>>Mark Edwards <Mark-E...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> Mark wrote:
>>>>Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim propaganda post
>>>> here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
>>>
>>> Offering to tickle muslims until they vomit is propaganda? I want
>>> some of
>>> what you're smoking.
>>
>>innocent (well, mostly innocent) (well, sorta innocent) question:
>>isn't he one of the bozos who's already flooding the group with 10
>>posts per one of content?
>
> Sort of. There's the Mark above, who's Just New and hasn't adjusted to
> us
> completely yet, and there's the *Mark who's forging headers to look
> like he's
> Mark but is actually posting from x-privat.org or some such, and who
> hasn't
> been here in the last few days from where I see things.
>
> So make it about 3 to 1 and he does fit...
Yabbut, if I can't fairly easily tell the difference between them, it
doesn't really matter.
--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net/blog