Obama’s HHS ‘Grooming’ Children for Sex
SUNDAY, 28 OCTOBER 2012 05:14 MATT BARBER
My dear friend and colleague Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting law
professor at Liberty University School of Law, recently guest lectured
during “Sexual Behavior and the Law,” a course I teach. Dr. Reisman’s
lecture was filmed by CSPAN and will be airing soon.
In past years, Dr. Reisman has served as scientific consultant to four
U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of
Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
She is a world renowned expert on the discredited research of bug
doctor turned “sexologist,” Alfred Kinsey.
Kinsey, though married to a woman who took part in his many filmed
“scientific” orgies, was a promiscuous homosexual and sadomasochist.
He managed to completely upend and twist the world’s perception of
human sexuality in the 1950s and ’60s with his world famous “Kinsey
Reports.”
Even today, most are completely unaware that during his tenure at
Indiana University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers,
the systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children
and infants – all in the name of science.
Among other things, Kinsey asserted that children are “sexual from
birth.” He further concluded, based upon experiments he directed and
documented in his infamous Table 34, that adult-child sex is harmless,
even beneficial, and described child “orgasm” as “culminating in
extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting. …”
Many children suffered “excruciating pain,” he observed, “and [would]
scream if movement [was] continued.” Some “[would] fight away from the
[adult] partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax,
although they derive[d] definite pleasure from the situation.”
Yeah. Sounds like it.
It’s little wonder that Dr. Reisman identifies Kinsey as a “sexual
psychopath.” These children were as young as 2 months old.
Disturbing though that may be, what’s equally disturbing is that
nearly all of today’s liberal “comprehensive sex education” curricula
– such as that pushed by groups like the National Education
Association (NEA), Planned Parenthood and the Gay Lesbian and Straight
Education Network (GLSEN) – is derived entirely from the criminally
fraudulent research of Alfred Kinsey.
But even more troubling is a recent discovery by Dr. Reisman. She
found that the Obama administration, which fully embraces the debunked
Kinsey sex-education model, has begun pushing a curriculum that, in
many ways, eerily mirrors the “FBI Molester Grooming Paradigm.”
In short, she found that both Obama’s HHS and many public sex-
education programs are doing to children, constructively, what
pedophiles do to “groom” them for sex:
According to the FBI, child molesters:
Demonstrate sex acts to children. Offenders commonly use pornography
to teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to
masturbate, perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.
Lower the sexual inhibitions of children. Some children naturally
fear sexual activities. Some offenders show pictures of other children
engaging in sexual activities to overcome these fears, indicating to
their intended victims that it is all right to have sex with an adult
because lots of other boys and girls do the same thing.
Desensitize children to sex. Offenders commonly show child
pornography to their intended victims to expose them to sexual acts
before they are naturally curious about such activities.
Sexually arouse children. Offenders commonly use pornographic images
of other children to arouse victims, particularly those in
adolescence.
During her lecture, Dr. Reisman shocked the 50-plus in attendance by
illustrating that today’s Kinseyan-based sex education – as promoted
by Obama’s HHS – does much of what the FBI describes above.
Graphic sexual images and explicit “values neutral” talk of sex and
sexuality are rampant throughout classrooms across America,
effectively desensitizing children and numbing their natural
inhibitions. These inhibitions help protect children from potential
predators.
According to Dr. Reisman, “the brain data fully support [the] finding”
that such “sex education” literally changes the neural pathways of a
child’s brain. There is mounting scientific evidence to support this
hypothesis.
Whatever its motive, the Obama administration is guilty of employing
these grooming techniques on children.
Consider, for instance, that just last year, the Department of Health
and Human Services’ “Questions and Answers About Sex” website provided
a “Quick Guide to Healthy Living” section which, like Kinsey,
outrageously claimed that “Children are human beings and therefore
sexual beings … which is healthy and normal.”
Get the implication? And what do “sexual beings” do? Well, they have
sex, of course. “It’s hard for parents to acknowledge this,” admitted
the page.
You think?
The HHS link then suggested that youth “may also experiment with
sexual experiences, including those with members of the same sex,
during the years they are exploring their own sexuality.”
Sound familiar? Remember, the FBI indicates that pedophiles will
“teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to masturbate,
perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.”
Who needs pedophiles when we have today’s “comprehensive sex
education”? It does all that and more.
Speaking of masturbation and other “sort of ‘sexual’ behavior … young
kids exhibit,” the HHS is right there to help. The link says “Parents
should only be concerned about masturbation if a child seems
preoccupied with it to the exclusion of other activities.”
Otherwise, masturbate away, I guess.
Today’s Kinseyan “comprehensive sex education” model, embraced by
Barack Obama and other “progressives,” is nothing short of educational
malpractice. It’s child corruption. It’s criminally reckless. It’s
undeniably “grooming” children for sex.
During the 2008 presidential campaign, a then-Sen. Barack Obama spoke
about teaching “comprehensive sex education” to kindergartners: “It’s
the right thing to do … to provide age-appropriate sex education,
science-based sex education in schools,” he said.
And by “science-based,” of course, he meant “Kinsey-based.”
So, what is age appropriate, science-based sex education? Well, we
know what Alfred Kinsey thought was “age appropriate.” We know what he
considered “science-based.”
I’d expect such “educational” grooming tactics and opinions from
Alfred Kinsey or Jerry Sandusky, but not from public educators – not
from the U.S. government.
And most certainly, not from the president of the United States.
Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an attorney concentrating in
constitutional law. He serves as Vice President of Liberty Counsel
Action.
http://www.truthandgrace.com/obama.htm