Resistance to jihad and Islamic supremacism is not "racism"
simple_...@yahoo.com
Here is yet another indication that, contrary to both the dominant
mainstream and the race/ethnicity-based parties of Europe, the jihad
is not a matter of race, but ideology. The dominant mainstream sees
resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism as "racism," while the
neo-fascist parties regard resistance to the jihad as required for the
preservation of white Europe. But if it is all about whites and non-
whites, what of a white convert to Islam like Suleyman Simon Keeler?
The focus needs to be on the destructive ideology people like Keeler
have embraced -- and the fact that he embraced it shows that talk of
race and racism in this context is just a red herring. I've said it
before, but like so many things in this struggle, I'm going to keep
saying them until someone listens and probably after that as well. A
race-based approach to the anti-jihad resistance is harmful in a
number of ways:
1. It's the wrong way to fight the global jihad. The jihad is not a
race, Islam is not a race, Muslims are not all of one race. The issues
between the Islamic world and non-Muslims are not racial. They are
about religious supremacism. Bringing in race just confuses the issue,
and allows jihadists and their de facto allies among the Eurabian
elites to claim that this whole thing is about racism.
2. To form one group for indigenous Europeans, as has been done in
several countries, reduces virtually every issue to the one non-
negotiable issue of race and ethnicity, discourages cooperation, and
thus encourages Balkanization, works against the idea of
representative government, and obscures the common values of Judeo-
Christian civilization that are shared by people of many races and
ethnicities.
3. This approach hamstrings and marginalizes the anti-jihad movement.
Many people who oppose the Islamization of Europe will never join with
a race-based party to do so. Hugh Fitzgerald and I have often
commented here over the years about the tragedy in Europe: the
mainstream political parties have completely abdicated any
responsibility to deal with the Islamization of Europe, thus leaving
the field open to groups that obscure the issue with racial politics.
4. Many, many people have written here, and will no doubt write again
in response to this post, that the parties that speak of race are the
only ones in Europe that are doing anything to resist Islamization,
and thus they deserve the support of all those who believe there is
something worth defending in Western non-Muslim civilization. I don't
think that is any sounder an argument than the claim that we must
support Hizballah because it builds schools and runs charities when
not lobbing rockets at Israeli civilians.
Also, people I respect have pointed out that European culture is being
overwhelmed and transformed by out-of-control Muslim immigration, and
there is nothing wrong with defending it from that. I agree. But while
culture has a racial component, culture and race are not identical. To
reduce culture to race on a continent that has seen six million
sacrificed to the idolatry of race and blood is not, in my view, the
right way to defend European culture -- and there must be articulated
a sane and moral alternative that is clearly distinct from that and
rejects it utterly. Geert Wilders in the Netherlands has managed to
mount a strong stance against Islamization while avoiding dalliance
with racial groups. While I am not a European and am conscious that
Europeans will probably charge me with naivete and ignorance (the last
time I posted this I inspired not one, but two websites charging me
with being a secret jihadist, so this time I'll probably be Satan
himself), I still don't see why it can't be done elsewhere. Such
dalliances inevitably raise the specter of neo-Nazism and white
supremacism, and allow the mainstream parties to pretend that Europe
faces a choice between becoming Eurabia and reviving the gas chamber.
There are other ways, there have to be other ways, to deal with this.
The anti-jihad movement, if it is to become mainstream in Europe or
the U.S., must articulate a positive vision of defense for the human
rights of all people against the ways in which those human rights are
contravened under Sharia, and avoid being diverted into side issues
and non-issues, or formulating the problem incorrectly.
"My brother the white muslim terror recruit," by Justin Penrose for
the Sunday Mirror (thanks to all who sent this in):
The first white British Muslim to be jailed for terrorism was flaunted
at extremist rallies by hook-handed preacher Abu Hamza, his brother
has revealed.
Colin Keeler, 34, told how his older brother Simon Keeler - jailed for
four-and-a-half years on Friday for inciting British Muslims to kill
allied troops - went from a dope-smoking layabout to an extremist
disciple of Hamza.
Colin said he was horrified to witness Hamza and his 36-year-old
brother together at a 2003 rally.
"I remember the look on Hamza's face, as if he had something he could
put on show because he had a white convert who could convert others,"
he said.
"It was pretty terrifying watching Hamza in front of all those people,
shouting at them to 'Join the cause'."
Colin, a former British Army soldier, said he and his brother, who
changed his name to Sulayman, had a few Muslim friends - "but he never
showed signs of seriously converting."
In 1999 the two brothers travelled around France, earning enough to
pay for their lodging, alcohol and cannabis. But Simon suddenly flew
to Morocco to "follow the word of Islam" and returned six months later
with a full Muslim beard.
"When he came back he was a different person," says Colin. "It's sad.
He was brainwashed to such a degree I'm not sure he even knew who he
was anymore."...
Once again, devoutness in Muslim observance is correlated to jihadist
sentiments, and the learned Western analysts neither notice nor care,
nor do a single thing to examine the implications of this.
SBC Yahoo
<simple_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:80ff5b21-33d9-4fd9...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
I'd say it was a matter of Survival. Ignore Islamic Jihad, and you and your
family will not survive. But then the Euroweenies would rather perish,
quitely, than actually have to do something that might cause them to have
to, well, you know, fight.
"A Weenie by any other name is still a weenie"
Oscar meyer
- - - - -</> <\> - - - - -
felonio...@aol.com
<simple_langu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> source:http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020740.php
Since the hysterical left worships Islam and the bombs that go with
it, I doubt they'll take this to heart.
simple_...@yahoo.com
> I'd say it was a matter of Survival. Ignore Islamic Jihad, and you and your
> family will not survive. But then the Euroweenies would rather perish,
> quitely, than actually have to do something that might cause them to have
> to, well, you know, fight.
Europe’s Muslim population is set to increase from around 13% today to
between 22% and 37% of the population by 2025. source:
http://news.scotsman.com/europeanunion/CIA-gives-grim-warning-on.2595505.jp
It is Islamic violence which threatens Holland and all of Europe.
Exactly as in the 1930s, it is the weakness of European leaders which
allows the threat to grow. Just as the League of Nations refused to
stand up to fascism in pre-WW2 Europe, the United Nations grovels
before Islam today. source: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2414
______________________________
feloniousmo...@aol.com wrote:
> Since the hysterical left worships Islam and the
> bombs that go with it, I doubt they'll take this to heart.
"We must be open and generous towards Muslims and Islam, so that when
we become the minority, they will be the same towards us." - Jens
Orback (Swedish Minister of Immigration)
Docky Wocky
would anyone ever believe that islam will co-exist with anyone else in the
future?
Doug
news:%qIPj.9537$GE1....@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
Funny stuff (the weenie quote that is). This is the first post I've seen by
Atilla.
It's nice to see someone else who has a sane view of the Islamonazi pigs.