Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black people are "brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a "deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows slowly made black people being couple with white people appear acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were "slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming, etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black people benefited because they became integrated with white people who were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating someone's mind is criminal.
What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men? According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist) beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size." <http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_...> People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating? The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman, can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?
In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean that the treatments given to black people were done so because white people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one another fairly in other aspect of our lives.
Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest. When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of your own kind is judged to be uglier. Also, there isn't any bald female involved in the Miss Universe contest either. So it appears that fat, bald, midget, big ass, hairy facial, etc, female are not viewed as "beautiful" in these contest so there is a "standard" of beauty. So the Miss Universe contest is a judgment of physical beauty not of inner beauty because anyone who doesn't fit the standard of physical beauty for the contest would not even enter the contest as history of the pageant demonstrates. But the Miss Universe pageant is not consistent when one looks at the winner of the contest. For instance, Great Britain[0], China[0], Korea[0], Ireland[0], Indonesia[0], Vietnam[0], Ukraine[0], Italy[0], Albania[0] don't seem to have any winner yet Japan[2], Thailand[2], Germany[1], Australia[2], do. So the contest is saying that a country like China with so may Asian cannot win yet a smaller Asian country like Japan can. I have pretended to be Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc, but I am really Chinese so how do you tell what I am by looking at me unless I told it to you. So the contest is saying a country like Great Britain with so many white people cannot win in a contest yet Australia can? So the point is what is the judge looking for really? Can I really tell in terms of appearance someone from Great Britain or Australia since it is a beauty contest? What if I put two attractive females one from Great Britain and one from Australia and never told you what countries they are from, can you tell with certainty? What if I add another attractive female from Ukraine, can you tell the three apart with certainty? In a contest of "looks", when you cannot tell what country each is from, then "looks" is not the outcome but the contest is about "looks" so it raises questions. Finally, the most winner in the contest as I currently write this is the USA[7] because the Miss Universe pageant is operated by someone in the USA. The Miss Universe pageant is dominated by USA[7], Venezuela[6], Puerto Rico[5], Sweden[3] with multiple wins as of year 2011, so why are they better than other countries? The Miss Universe pageant has an external factor in the decision process that is not consistent with logic.
For instance, according to logical perception, people of similar kind should see things in a similar fashion. Logical perception dictates that one should gear towards those closest to oneself in terms of attraction. Human for example are too distant from animal so human as a race would be attracted to itself and not to animal. To move this logic further, a race would be attracted to that which is closest to itself instead of another race. But the human race has slight variation that the difference may not be too great that other factors may come into
...
