Re: Stunted Brain Stem Mark of Intelligence?

[Uergil]

In article
<4d899bca-2df3-4579...@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:

> Researchers examining the cadavers of
> atheists are reporting more findings of
> stunted brain-stems

Then such brain stems must confer added intelligence since there is a
distinct positive correlation between atheism and intelligence.




According to the following, atheists (non-theists like us) are clearly
more intelligent on average than theists:

http://hypnosis.home.netcom.com/iq_vs_religiosity.htm

http://pondside.uchicago.edu/ee/faculty/Coyne/pdf/New_Republic_ID.pdf

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/why_are_scientists_atheists.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2111174/Intelligent-people-less-li
kely-to-believe-in-God.html

And over 90% of the worlds top scientists are non-theists, as verified
by looking at the British Royal Society and the American Academy of
Sciences.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson

[dolf]

It would seem that we are being subject to a systematic campaign of
fascist based religious, racial and sexual prejudices by Uergil and his
supposed atheist mates.

No body (including British Royal Society and the American Academy of
Sciences) have shown a respect over the correctness of any findings over
discovery of a hyponomic cosmological anthropic principle.

On 28/05/12 4:54 AM, Uergil wrote:
> In article
> <4d899bca-2df3-4579...@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> BroilJAB<Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
>> Researchers examining the cadavers of
>> atheists are reporting more findings of
>> stunted brain-stems
>
> Then such brain stems must confer added intelligence since there is a
> distinct positive correlation between atheism and intelligence.
>
>
>
> According to the following, atheists (non-theists like us) are clearly
>

> And over 90% of the worlds top scientists are non-theists, as verified
> by looking at the British Royal Society and the American Academy of
> Sciences.

"We have Jesus on the cross
Your cold love put him there.
What is now your human loss?
Forever gone and despair."

What gives BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com) away is his unusual
capacity as a claimed atheist, to call the Pontiff holy when he is in
fact perverse.

It would appear that once again, we have mongrel catholic dogs engaged
in public campaigns of disinformation and vilification of the truth,
which diminishes our human rights.

dolf: “Wasn’t the Pope recently asked on: ‘Creationists need [for a]
Catholic vision’?”



BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com): “Lets hope the Holy Pontiff
sets many creationists back on the right path.”



Vurgil or Uirgit? (vur...@arg.erg / uir...@uirgil.ur): “It would be a
great improvement.”



dolf: “He knows Greedy!”



BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com): “From what I understand.”



Vurgil or Uirgit? (vur...@arg.erg / uir...@uirgil.ur): “Which is nothing!”



dolf: “Is it painful? 

Very soon being Roman Catholic will be prima
facie proof of guilt in claims of crimes against the dignity of the
'Sovereign Autonomy' made under the Commonwealth of Australia.”



#20 / .jackNote@zen: 5, row: 3, col: 3, nous: 7 [Super: #397 / #46 -
Guiding Contentment, Moderation of Desire; I-Ching: H1 - Creative
Principle/Heaven; Tetra: 37 - Purity, Ego: #403 / #7 - Intentional
Reversal, Dimming Radiance; I-Ching: H12 - Stagnation; Tetra: 56 -
Closed Mouth] {Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: Form of Nature {Autonomous
Nature}}}

In relation to this notion of The Decade is the meaning of Yom Kippur as
a ritual of nullification held over a 10 day period commencing a new
Moon on 18 September 2001 (as my particular interest for synchronising
the centre of the Grapple Temporal / Noumenal Reality for a 5 day period
being #41 on 13 September 2001 as a centrifugal model comprising septet
#369 magic squares with the solar / lunar chronological cycle and
rational representation of PI / ENNEAD) and the Dead Sea Scroll
chronological principle which is a cosmological straight line--hence
transcendent--in having a starting point on the Equinox of Wednesday 20
March 1996 with a new Moon on Thursday 21 March for a base 7 Numbering
system intrinsic to the cosmogony as rational representation of PI.

In that for 3 x 364 days = 1092 days there was a lunar/solar comparison
of 3 x 354 lunar years + 30 days = 1092 days. There are in a cycle of 5
x 364 days + 182 days (as a 1/2 cycle) two fragments in the Dead Sea
Scroll relics related to the 1st day of the 7th solar month as occurring
on 12 September 2001 and the 21st priestly course starting on Sunday 16
September 2001 which fragment also brings together an association of the
solar and lunar cycles which appear to have been a readily observable
phenomenon.

In that this has according to the Dead Sea Scrolls, a reprise in a 294 x
364 day years as 6 Jubilees or 293 x 365.2423 days (just short of the
tropical years, but technologically better than the Julian calendar of
365.25 days instigated in 45 BCE and reformed in 1582 CE (1751 CE in
British Empire) by the Gregorian calendar reforms due to an
intercalation error resulting in a lost of synchronicity comprising a
magnitude loss of one day every 128 years. This forms the basis for
arguing a metaphysical and cosmological origin of language as 22
elements of the Hebrew letters which is otherwise shown geometrically as
an indestructible object (atom) in the association of the 10 as Decade
(as Greek and Ennead as Egyptian notions) and counts (number) and the 22
letters as 3 horizontal (Mother letters), 7 vertical lines (Double
letters) and 12 diagonal lines (Single letters):

Kabbalistic Tree of Life

ATZILUTH {1st as “World of Emanation” also known as Olam Atzilut, עולם
אצילות in Hebrew}

BRIYAH {2nd as “World of Creation” also known as Olam Briyah, עולם בריאה
in Hebrew}

YETZIRAH {3rd as “World of Formation” also known as Olam Yetsirah, עולם
יצירה in Hebrew}

ASSIYAH {4th as “World of Action” also known as Olam Asiyah, עולם עשיה
in Hebrew}

- http://www.grapple369.com/index_files/tree.gif
- http://www.grapple369.com/index_files/yetziratic_wheel.png

This is Chaldean / Babylonian in Origins: Hebrew letters as described in
the “Sefer Yetzirah”

YETZIRAH as in “Making" is as opposed to BRIYAH as in "Creating"
Actually taking whatever matter that was created in the BRIYAH and
shaping it into the basic elements.

It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 2 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.

#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7]
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100]
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4]
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300]
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#'AYIN / #70] = #0 CE as HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE
MARRIAGE -- WHAT IS SIN & WICKEDNESS?) autonomic transformative
prototype and symbolic associator to the series #15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE,
#111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE, #369 CE ... #2000 Y2K
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20] = #400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90] = #1600 CE
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40] = #2000 Y2K / Equinox of DATE(1996,3,20)
+ (5 * 364) + 182 days = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

- http://www.grapple369.com/index_files/toth9.gif

#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400] as 8800 CE

In many instances, the Torah also uses words and phrases in ways that
cannot be understood in their literal sense. There are a number of very
obvious examples of this in the narrative of the Creation, for the
metaphysical events that took place at that time were far removed from
the natural order of the world we know today. They could not have been
accurately described in ways that we can understand, nor in language
that we can relate to. For example, the Torah tells us how God brought
the world into being through speech, when in fact He created the world
through a form of thought. When the Torah describes God's thought
process as speech, it makes it easier for us to grasp the idea on our
own level. [Copyright © 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]

dolf: “Fascist Dogs BroilJAB & Uergil discuss their creation denial!”

BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com): “The deviant creationists twist
and turn, twist the words of the faithful.

Sad it is to see them like this.”

Uergil (Uer...@uer.net): “If there is any damnation, it is the nation
creationists inhabit.”

dolf: “Vurgil or Uirgit? (vur...@arg.erg / uir...@uirgil.ur)

Or is it now Uergil?

Creationist denial has its roots in German political theatre.

Numerological and mystic speculation was especially rife amongst German
Romantics and Naturphilosophien during the nineteenth century and grew
out of ancient teleological speculations concerning the harmonious
distribution of the heavenly bodies. Such speculation was by no means
confined to the celestial motions; in 1818 the Kantian mineralogist
Christian Weiss even argues for a link between aspects of
rhombic-dodecahedral crystal structure and the musical scale of tones!
However, such flights of imaginative fancy generally had little impact
upon the work of serious scientists; with one notable exception.

In 1766 Johann Daniel Titius von Wittenberg was preparing a German
translation of Charles Bonnet’s Contemplation de la Nature. To the
section on planetary motions he added a now famous footnote pointing out
that the radii of all the planetary orbits can be generated by the
following simple algorithm, where r is measured in astronomical units (1
AU = 1.496 x 1013 cm):


rn = 0.4 + 0.3 x 2n; n = 0,1,2…


This formula provided a striking approximation for the distance from the
Sun to the six then-known planets: Mercury {Measured: 0.39, Predicted:
0.4}, Venus {Measured: 0.72, Predicted: 0.7}, Earth {Measured: 1.00,
Predicted: 1.0}, Mars {Measured: 1.52, Predicted: 1.6}, Jupiter
{Measured: 5.20, Predicted: 5.2}, Saturn {Measured: 9.55, Predicted:
10.0}. Their measured distances from the Sun at the time of the Law’s
inception are indicated together with Titius’ predictions. [Rediscovery
of the Anthropic Principle, John Barrow & Frank Tipler, The Anthropic
Cosmological Principle, © 1996, p 221]

There is no more opportunity for repentance--and neither for forgiveness.

To hell with you!”

#21 / .jackNote@zen: 5, row: 3, col: 7, nous: 67 [Super: #313 / #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Delay;
Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #462 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 -
Tread Carefully; Tetra: 48 - Ritual] {Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales
of Liability}}

[dolf]

It would seem that we are being subject to a systematic campaign of
fascist based religious, racial and sexual prejudices by Uergil and his
supposed atheist mates.

No body (including British Royal Society and the American Academy of
Sciences) have shown a respect over the correctness of any findings over
discovery of a hyponomic cosmological anthropic principle.

On 28/05/12 4:54 AM, Uergil wrote:

> In article
> <4d899bca-2df3-4579...@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> BroilJAB<Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
>> Researchers examining the cadavers of
>> atheists are reporting more findings of
>> stunted brain-stems
>
> Then such brain stems must confer added intelligence since there is a
> distinct positive correlation between atheism and intelligence.
>
>
>
> According to the following, atheists (non-theists like us) are clearly
>

> And over 90% of the worlds top scientists are non-theists, as verified
> by looking at the British Royal Society and the American Academy of
> Sciences.

[Uergil]

In article
<1ef13ba8-7819-455c...@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:


Known liar Liarboi Broiljab says

> Researchers examining the cadavers of
> atheists are reporting more findings of
> stunted brain-stems

Which would, if true, be an evolutionary advantage, since atheists are,
on average, smarter than theists in general, and much smarter than
creationists like Liarboi Broiljab .

[dolf]

Which aspects of the facts of the objective physical evidence about
hyponomic cosmological anthropic principle did you have a problem with?

They exhibit a disposition towards modes of €˜self-depravation€™
and €˜non-sapiental€™ characterizations of people that bears equivalence
to idioms routinely deployed as satirical depictions and epithets
against individuals with same-gender orientations professing religious
belief.

However as Gadamer (1976) suggests when the layman wonders what
philosophy really is, he has the idea that philosophising means
defining, and taking responsibility for the need to define, the concepts
in which all men think as homo[ios] sapien[tal]. Since as a rule we do
not see this happen, we have helped ourselves by means of a doctrine of
implicit definition.

In reality, however, such a €œdoctrine€ is a mere verbalism as is the
neologism starting with the German word: Dasein--which is not another
name for €˜consciousness€™, €™subject€™, or €˜human being€™. Heidegger
introduces a vocabulary that challenges the reader [Stambaugh
2010:xviii]. To say nothing of the Hebrew word: Dashen {(#4 - Daleth;
#300 - Shin; #50 - Nun = #354 / #390 as H1878) specifically to anoint;
figuratively to satisfy; denominatively (from H1880 ) to remove (fat)
ashes (of sacrifices):€”accept, anoint, take away the (receive) ashes
(from), make (wax) fat}. For to call a definition implicit obviously
means one finally comes to notice, on the basis of a number of sentences
that someone has spoken. And he or she was thinking something
unambiguous by means of using a concept. In this respect, philosophers
are no different from other men, for other men too are in the habit of
thinking definite things and avoiding contradictions. The lay opinion
appealed to here is in fact dominated by the doctrine that universals or
general ideas are mere names without any corresponding reality as
nominalistic tradition of recent centuries, in considering linguistic
reproduction as a kind of application of signs. It is obvious that
artificial signs need an organisation and arrangement that excludes any
ambiguity. Thus the demand arises that the illusionary problems
of €œmetaphysics€ must be unmasked by establishing the univocal use of
language. [Gadamer 1971:125-126]

The issue of what constitutes an acceptable human identity has been
regularly debated amongst religionists and remains unresolved.

The continuing reliance upon symbolic theology and philosophy of
religion derived from Pythagorean onomantick hymeneal mysticism as a
regime of religious/political governance€”is blasphemy as a dynamic
contention of opposites expressed between the Roman Imperial
religious/political hymeneal conception of hyponomos (under law; subject
to law) and its association to the chronological hyponomic character of
the hypostatis (eg: 12 x 6J = 72J + 3(3^2+1)/2 = 457 BCE + 70 weeks = 33
CE as hypothetical) and the personality of Jesus (YHVS) Christ--refusing
to acknowledge the First Cause as a Personality which can be attributed.

That a social declension of the autonomous, sovereign and common or
aggregate and territorial right of a people as depicted within the
Community Service Announcements, may be said to occur, whenever there is
a denial, whether deliberate, casual, or simply an obsolescent regard
for the Hyponomic Cosmological (Anthropic) Principle, due to a
progressive claim to enlightenment.

An axiomatic or insubstantial €˜State€™ based hymeneal values, which on
the basis of dichotomy of opposites, continues to proffer a lack of
accountability as the split between religion/faith, politics and real
life--the serpent chases it€™s tail where the cause of the problem,
attempts to busy itself in giving solace: €œLord, Lord, have we not
prophesied in thy name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy
name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I
never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.€ [Matthew 7:22-23]

On 29/05/12 2:58 AM, Uergil wrote:
> In article
> <1ef13ba8-7819-455c...@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
> BroilJAB<Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
>
> Known liar Liarboi Broiljab says
>> Researchers examining the cadavers of
>> atheists are reporting more findings of
>> stunted brain-stems
>
> Which would, if true, be an evolutionary advantage, since atheists are,
> on average, smarter than theists in general, and much smarter than
> creationists like Liarboi Broiljab .

It would seem that we are being subject to a systematic campaign of
fascist based religious, racial and sexual prejudices by Uergil and his
supposed atheist mates.

"We have Jesus on the cross
Your cold love put him there.
What is now your human loss?
Forever gone and despair."

What gives BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com) away is his unusual
capacity as a claimed atheist, to call the Pontiff holy when he is in
fact perverse.

It would appear that once again, we have mongrel catholic dogs engaged
in public campaigns of disinformation and vilification of the truth,
which diminishes our human rights.

dolf: €œWasn€™t the Pope recently asked on: €˜Creationists need [for a]
Catholic vision€™?€

€¨€¨BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com): €œLets hope the Holy Pontiff

sets many creationists back on the right path.€ €¨€¨

Vurgil or Uirgit? (vur...@arg.erg / uir...@uirgil.ur): €œIt would be a
great improvement.€

€¨€¨dolf: €œHe knows Greedy!€ €¨€¨

BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com): €œFrom what I understand.€ €¨€¨

Vurgil or Uirgit? (vur...@arg.erg / uir...@uirgil.ur): €œWhich is nothing!€

€¨€¨dolf: €œIs it painful? €¨€¨Very soon being Roman Catholic will be

ATZILUTH {1st as €œWorld of Emanation€ also known as Olam
Atzilut, ×¢×•×œ× × ×¦×™×œ×•×ª in Hebrew}

BRIYAH {2nd as €œWorld of Creation€ also known as Olam
Briyah, ×¢×•×œ× ×‘×¨×™× ×” in Hebrew}

YETZIRAH {3rd as €œWorld of Formation€ also known as Olam
Yetsirah, ×¢×•×œ× ×™×¦×™×¨×” in Hebrew}

ASSIYAH {4th as €œWorld of Action€ also known as Olam Asiyah,
×¢×•×œ× ×¢×©×™×” in Hebrew}

- http://www.grapple369.com/index_files/tree.gif
- http://www.grapple369.com/index_files/yetziratic_wheel.png

This is Chaldean / Babylonian in Origins: Hebrew letters as described in

the €œSefer Yetzirah€

YETZIRAH as in €œMaking" is as opposed to BRIYAH as in "Creating"

dolf: €œFascist Dogs BroilJAB & Uergil discuss their creation denial!€

BroilJAB (Design...@wmconnect.com): €œThe deviant creationists twist

and turn, twist the words of the faithful.

Sad it is to see them like this.€

Uergil (Uer...@uer.net): €œIf there is any damnation, it is the nation
creationists inhabit.€

dolf: €œVurgil or Uirgit? (vur...@arg.erg / uir...@uirgil.ur)

[Uergil]

In article
<26bccc2b-6315-463e...@l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:

On average, the IQ of BroilJAB is two
Standard Deviations below idiot.

[Uergil]

In article
<717fbd21-d249-4f6d...@eh4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:

Researchers examining the cadaver of
Liarboi Broiljab are reporting findings a
stunted brain-stems, and which they now
attribute to his 'moral difficulties' and
cognitive disfunction in general.


Theists, particularly creationists, keep insisting that atheists are
all claiming that no gods exist, but that is false.

What atheism actually requires is merely lack of faith that any gods
exist.

And, as atheism requires no claims about whether any gods actually do or
do not exist, it has no need of proof.

On the other hand, theists claim that their gods actually do exist, so
are claiming something that presupposes objective physical evidence, but
for which claim they can provide absolutely none of that requisite
supporting objective physical evidence.

To reprise: Mere lack of belief in the existence of something, as in
atheism, is only problematic when there is a plentiful supply of
objective physical evidence that that thing actually exists. Which is
NOT the case with anything that atheists, as atheists, lack belief in.

Presence of belief in the existence of something, as in theism, is only
problematic when there is a total lack of objective physical evidence
supporting that belief. Which IS the case with much of what theists
claim to believe in.