Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Brother Gerry McCann
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Jahbulon
May 5, 2012, 12:42:43 PM5/5/12
to
In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
Offence Register.
--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/jahbulon.html
who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
Offence Register.
--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/jahbulon.html
saracene
May 5, 2012, 1:03:11 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 5:42 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> Offence Register.
>
> --
Are you daring him to sue you for libel? Or do you have a reputable
> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> Offence Register.
>
> --
link?
Tony Dragon
May 5, 2012, 1:15:21 PM5/5/12
to
On 05/05/2012 17:42, Jahbulon wrote:
> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> Offence Register.
>
Evidence.
> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> Offence Register.
>
If he was placed on the Register (IIRC the name you have given is not
correct) there should be a record of the court case.
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 1:18:38 PM5/5/12
to
Operation Ore" into a search engine?
Oh, wait a minute - you really dont want to search using those
keywords do you?
You want someone else to do all that for you. I wonder why? Are you so
paranoid that you are really frightened of what might happen to you if
you do?
It goes to show just how much the authorities are becoming 'Big
Brother' if people are frightened of just being curious.
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 1:21:06 PM5/5/12
to
totallyconfused
May 5, 2012, 1:24:59 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 5:42 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
happy people. Also, two points. The vast majority of Orees had less
than 25 'images' which were found either as hash tags or in temp
cache. Also; 2006? If he was on the list he would have been a 'tier
one' for investigation; specifically people who either had access to
sensitive government data (eg high MOD clearance/NHS records) and/or
high access to children. By 2006, the arrests were for 'tier 3'.
TC
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 1:29:01 PM5/5/12
to
already.
Janitor of Lunacy
May 5, 2012, 1:29:30 PM5/5/12
to
"Jahbulon" <inv...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA04AB42D8CE8F...@69.16.185.250...
> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> Offence Register.
"You agree that you will not use our services in a way that would: (i) be
> who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> Offence Register.
unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, or obscene, (ii)
constitute or encourage conduct that would constitute a criminal offense,
give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate applicable laws or
regulations, (iii) introduce or propagate a virus or other harmful
component, or (vi) violate the Acceptable Use Policies of any service or
technology accessed through our services."
Ring a bell?
saracene
May 5, 2012, 1:42:44 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 6:18 pm, sutartsorric <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 6:03 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 5, 5:42 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> > > who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> > > download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> > > having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> > > abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> > > abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> > > Offence Register.
>
> > > --
>
> > Are you daring him to sue you for libel? Or do you have a reputable
> > link?
>
> There are lots of links. Are you incapable of entering "Gerry McCann,
> Operation Ore" into a search engine?
I did and couldn't find anything reputable. Anyway the name's
> On May 5, 6:03 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 5, 5:42 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> > > who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> > > download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> > > having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> > > abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> > > abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> > > Offence Register.
>
> > > --
>
> > Are you daring him to sue you for libel? Or do you have a reputable
> > link?
>
> There are lots of links. Are you incapable of entering "Gerry McCann,
> Operation Ore" into a search engine?
misspelt.
saracene
May 5, 2012, 1:52:01 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 6:18 pm, sutartsorric <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 6:03 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 5, 5:42 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> > > who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> > > download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> > > having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> > > abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> > > abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> > > Offence Register.
>
> > > --
>
> > Are you daring him to sue you for libel? Or do you have a reputable
> > link?
>
> There are lots of links. Are you incapable of entering "Gerry McCann,
> Operation Ore" into a search engine?
I did and can't find a reputable one.
>
> > On May 5, 5:42 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:> In 2006, caught as part of Operation Ore, Freemason Brother Gerry McCann,
> > > who claims he is Roman Catholic, was found to have used his credit card to
> > > download illegal child pornography from the Internet and was charged with
> > > having over 200,000 indecent images of children and babies being sexually
> > > abused and murdered and for trafficking his own produced video's of child
> > > abuses and murder, which landed him on the UK National Child Sex Abuse
> > > Offence Register.
>
> > > --
>
> > Are you daring him to sue you for libel? Or do you have a reputable
> > link?
>
> There are lots of links. Are you incapable of entering "Gerry McCann,
> Operation Ore" into a search engine?
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 2:13:53 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 6:52 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 6:18 pm, sutartsorric <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 6:03 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are lots of links. Are you incapable of entering "Gerry McCann,
> > Operation Ore" into a search engine?
>
> I did and can't find a reputable one.
>
>
>
>
>
Is that surprising? There seems to be nothing reputable about any of
> On May 5, 6:18 pm, sutartsorric <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 6:03 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are lots of links. Are you incapable of entering "Gerry McCann,
> > Operation Ore" into a search engine?
>
> I did and can't find a reputable one.
>
>
>
>
>
the story.
How many other families who have lost young children, have had so many
accusations and theories associated with them? And why do you think
that is?
Nigel Oldfield
May 5, 2012, 2:20:36 PM5/5/12
to
WM
Nigel Oldfield
May 5, 2012, 2:28:33 PM5/5/12
to
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MCCANNS_BACKGROUND.htm
"This information belongs to the Ministério Público in Portimão, Portugal.
It was released to the public on 4 August 2008 in accordance with
Portuguese Law"
I would hate for the gentleman, as named, to be defamed here, and by
such a website.
WM
Nigel Oldfield
May 5, 2012, 2:30:42 PM5/5/12
to
On 05/05/2012 19:28, Nigel Oldfield wrote:
> I would hate for the gentleman, as named, to be defamed here, and by
> such a website.
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id338.html
> I would hate for the gentleman, as named, to be defamed here, and by
> such a website.
WM
Nigel Oldfield
May 5, 2012, 2:33:36 PM5/5/12
to
Janitor of Lunacy
May 5, 2012, 2:36:29 PM5/5/12
to
"sutartsorric" <sutart...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:946d93ce-2da0-4aff...@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com...
case management system.
Tony Dragon
May 5, 2012, 2:48:12 PM5/5/12
to
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 2:48:42 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 7:36 pm, "Janitor of Lunacy" <z...@zonk.com> wrote:
> "sutartsorric" <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
Why would you create a case management reference, and then not use it?
> "sutartsorric" <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
Jahbulon
May 5, 2012, 3:01:49 PM5/5/12
to
saracene <john...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ca0d8709-5080-4fe1...@k13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
> Are you daring him to sue you for libel?
> Or do you have a reputable link?
http://tinyurl.com/bqz2uxf
news:ca0d8709-5080-4fe1...@k13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
> Are you daring him to sue you for libel?
> Or do you have a reputable link?
Janitor of Lunacy
May 5, 2012, 3:05:25 PM5/5/12
to
news:07180abf-f606-44a8...@y11g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
It's standard procedure in possible cases of child neglect, or worse, and
little should be read into it.
little should be read into it.
Janitor of Lunacy
May 5, 2012, 3:08:16 PM5/5/12
to
"Nigel Oldfield" <WMCritica...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:jo3rge$iq7$2...@dont-email.me...
mccannpjfiles.co.uk
Registrant:
MPJ
Registrant type:
UK Individual
Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.
"Well, what a surprise! Methinks a Norwich Pharmacal order may be on the
way to Webfusion Ltd.
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 3:09:10 PM5/5/12
to
You mean he had previous suspicions of being responsible for child
neglect?
Jahbulon
May 5, 2012, 3:09:29 PM5/5/12
to
saracene <john...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:93c04ea3-0777-4acf...@d8g2000vbw.googlegroups.com:
> I did and can't find a reputable one.
That's because Freemasons define as disreputable
every source they do not like.
news:93c04ea3-0777-4acf...@d8g2000vbw.googlegroups.com:
> I did and can't find a reputable one.
every source they do not like.
saracene
May 5, 2012, 3:17:50 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 8:09 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
Reputable = trustworthy.
It's not that I don't like your sources, I don't trust them.
> saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote innews:93c04ea3-0777-4acf...@d8g2000vbw.googlegroups.com:
>
> > I did and can't find a reputable one.
>
> That's because Freemasons define as disreputable
> every source they do not like.
>
> --
>
> Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
>
I am not eligible to become a Freemason.
>
> > I did and can't find a reputable one.
>
> That's because Freemasons define as disreputable
> every source they do not like.
>
> --
>
> Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
>
Reputable = trustworthy.
It's not that I don't like your sources, I don't trust them.
GB
May 5, 2012, 3:38:33 PM5/5/12
to
I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point being
made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed troll.
Why feed him?
made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed troll.
Why feed him?
saracene
May 5, 2012, 3:41:00 PM5/5/12
to
totallyconfused
May 5, 2012, 3:44:06 PM5/5/12
to
there about Ore.
Meanwhile, I found these links 'of interest':
http://www.zimbio.com/Madeleine+McCann/articles/0TbF8jogRV6/Gerry+Kate+McCann+serial+child+neglectors
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t443-operation-ore
http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-link-to-madeleine-mccann-jailed/
TC
Jahbulon
May 5, 2012, 3:50:02 PM5/5/12
to
saracene <john...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:fd1a0d18-ef1d-4d05...@a5g2000vbn.googlegroups.com:
> It's not that I don't like your sources,
> I don't trust them.
No one asked you to trust me: write to Brother Gerry McCann and ask him
yourself.
--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/jahbulon.html
news:fd1a0d18-ef1d-4d05...@a5g2000vbn.googlegroups.com:
> It's not that I don't like your sources,
> I don't trust them.
yourself.
--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
sutartsorric
May 5, 2012, 3:59:56 PM5/5/12
to
On May 5, 8:44 pm, totallyconfused <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 8:41 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 5, 8:38 pm, "GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > > I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point being
> > > made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed troll.
> > > Why feed him?
>
> > Good point.
>
> I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
> there about Ore.
>
> Meanwhile, I found these links 'of interest':http://www.zimbio.com/Madeleine+McCann/articles/0TbF8jogRV6/Gerry+Kat...
> On May 5, 8:41 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 5, 8:38 pm, "GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > > I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point being
> > > made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed troll.
> > > Why feed him?
>
> > Good point.
>
> I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
> there about Ore.
>
>
> http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t443-operation-ore
>
> http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-l...
>
> TC
This seems to be getting murkier and murkier.
Zapp Brannigan
May 6, 2012, 6:38:48 AM5/6/12
to
"totallyconfused" <lisab...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:acc09104-1a13-4b05...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
amazing to read the rambling, delusional conspiracy theories which they
confect on their fevered messageboards. They are the armchair-cousins of
the Paulsgrove paedophile burners.
Mentalguy2k8
May 6, 2012, 7:06:32 AM5/6/12
to
"Zapp Brannigan" <ZBr...@DOOP.com> wrote in message
news:jo5kcf$6c1$1...@dont-email.me...
available that points to the abduction theory? That's just a conspiracy
theory itself after all, but I'm sure a lot of posters would be interested
in the inarguable evidence that exists in favour of it.
totallyconfused
May 6, 2012, 7:13:57 AM5/6/12
to
On May 6, 11:38 am, "Zapp Brannigan" <ZBr...@DOOP.com> wrote:
> "totallyconfused" <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
See above:
did provide a good 'cover' for those who wanted to bury their blatant
lies regarding Ore- distraction of the masses technique.)
TC
> "totallyconfused" <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:acc09104-1a13-4b05...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 8:41 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On May 5, 8:38 pm, "GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point
> >> > being
> >> > made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed
> >> > troll.
> >> > Why feed him?
>
> >> Good point.
>
> > I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
> > there about Ore.
>
> > Meanwhile, I found these links 'of interest':
> news:acc09104-1a13-4b05...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 8:41 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On May 5, 8:38 pm, "GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point
> >> > being
> >> > made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed
> >> > troll.
> >> > Why feed him?
>
> >> Good point.
>
> > I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
> > there about Ore.
>
> > Meanwhile, I found these links 'of interest':
> >http://www.zimbio.com/Madeleine+McCann/articles/0TbF8jogRV6/Gerry+Kat...
>
> >http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t443-operation-ore
>
> >http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-l...
>
>
> >http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t443-operation-ore
>
> >http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-l...
>
> The Madeleine McCann case has become a magnet for nutjobs of every species -
> amazing to read the rambling, delusional conspiracy theories which they
> confect on their fevered messageboards. They are the armchair-cousins of
> the Paulsgrove paedophile burners.- Hide quoted text -
> amazing to read the rambling, delusional conspiracy theories which they
> confect on their fevered messageboards. They are the armchair-cousins of
>
> - Show quoted text -
See above:
I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
there about Ore.
Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds. (But they
there about Ore.
did provide a good 'cover' for those who wanted to bury their blatant
lies regarding Ore- distraction of the masses technique.)
TC
Jahbulon
May 6, 2012, 10:23:43 AM5/6/12
to
totallyconfused <lisab...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
sutartsorric
May 6, 2012, 1:32:26 PM5/6/12
to
On May 6, 11:38 am, "Zapp Brannigan" <ZBr...@DOOP.com> wrote:
> "totallyconfused" <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:acc09104-1a13-4b05...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 8:41 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On May 5, 8:38 pm, "GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point
> >> > being
> >> > made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed
> >> > troll.
> >> > Why feed him?
>
> >> Good point.
>
> > I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
> > there about Ore.
>
> > Meanwhile, I found these links 'of interest':
> news:acc09104-1a13-4b05...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 8:41 pm, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On May 5, 8:38 pm, "GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I feel short-changed. I read this thread in case there was some point
> >> > being
> >> > made. But no, you are all responding to the ravings of an obsessed
> >> > troll.
> >> > Why feed him?
>
> >> Good point.
>
> > I am not feeding the troll; simply correcting the misinformation out
> > there about Ore.
>
> > Meanwhile, I found these links 'of interest':
> >http://www.zimbio.com/Madeleine+McCann/articles/0TbF8jogRV6/Gerry+Kat...
>
> >http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t443-operation-ore
>
> >http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-l...
>
>
> >http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t443-operation-ore
>
> >http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-l...
>
> The Madeleine McCann case has become a magnet for nutjobs of every species -
> amazing to read the rambling, delusional conspiracy theories which they
> confect on their fevered messageboards. They are the armchair-cousins of
> the Paulsgrove paedophile burners.
Ok, so every theory about Madeleine is a conspiracy, except for the
> amazing to read the rambling, delusional conspiracy theories which they
> confect on their fevered messageboards. They are the armchair-cousins of
> the Paulsgrove paedophile burners.
one you believe in?
And how does that not make you a nut job as well?
Presumably, you are about to show us the watertight case you have for
how the girl was abducted, and when - and maybe even where she is now?
Be sure to include all the details - after all presumably your version
is above criticism.
Janitor of Lunacy
May 6, 2012, 1:50:27 PM5/6/12
to
news:8fb8c79a-763e-46c6...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
---
Not at all. It is possible not to have one's own theory. It is also possible
to realise that of all theories, this one tends to lack credibility because
it is repeatedly, and tediously, unsupported by any credible evidence. And
it is also possible not to give a toss about any of the theories at all and
to understand that some things are unknown and likely to remain so for a
very long time.
Not at all. It is possible not to have one's own theory. It is also possible
to realise that of all theories, this one tends to lack credibility because
it is repeatedly, and tediously, unsupported by any credible evidence. And
it is also possible not to give a toss about any of the theories at all and
to understand that some things are unknown and likely to remain so for a
very long time.
DVH
May 6, 2012, 2:28:34 PM5/6/12
to
news:XnsA04B9C9CFD973...@69.16.185.250...
> totallyconfused <lisab...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>
> I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
Was it another of your lies?
> news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>
> I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
sutartsorric
May 6, 2012, 2:29:24 PM5/6/12
to
On May 6, 6:50 pm, "Janitor of Lunacy" <z...@zonk.com> wrote:
> "sutartsorric" <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
That is very true, but having read the witness statements and seen how
some of them have changed as regularly as the wind direction, I can
understand how people begin to question the official version.
Then, adding on the voracity with which the slightest questioning of
said official version is pursued by high profile lawyers, it is not
really just the nutjobs who question why such silencing of wayward
voices needs to take place.
> "sutartsorric" <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
some of them have changed as regularly as the wind direction, I can
understand how people begin to question the official version.
Then, adding on the voracity with which the slightest questioning of
said official version is pursued by high profile lawyers, it is not
really just the nutjobs who question why such silencing of wayward
voices needs to take place.
totallyconfused
May 6, 2012, 2:37:36 PM5/6/12
to
On May 6, 7:28 pm, "DVH" <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
> "Jahbulon" <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote in message
>
> news:XnsA04B9C9CFD973...@69.16.185.250...
>
> > totallyconfused <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in
Jahbulon View profile
More options May 5, 5:42 pm
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/browse_thread/thread/3e7bd3cba4c4eb5e?hl=en#
TC
> "Jahbulon" <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote in message
>
> news:XnsA04B9C9CFD973...@69.16.185.250...
>
> > totallyconfused <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>
> > I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
>
> Was it another of your lies?
I hope you are not referring to me as I did not start the thread!!!!
>
> >> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>
> > I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
>
> Was it another of your lies?
Jahbulon View profile
More options May 5, 5:42 pm
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/browse_thread/thread/3e7bd3cba4c4eb5e?hl=en#
TC
DVH
May 6, 2012, 2:56:51 PM5/6/12
to
news:7e64efa5-92a1-4f25...@bh8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
On May 6, 7:28 pm, "DVH" <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
> "Jahbulon" <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote in message
>
> news:XnsA04B9C9CFD973...@69.16.185.250...
>
> > totallyconfused <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>
> > I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
>
> Was it another of your lies?
> I hope you are not referring to me as I did not start the thread!!!!
I'm not referring to you.
> "Jahbulon" <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote in message
>
> news:XnsA04B9C9CFD973...@69.16.185.250...
>
> > totallyconfused <lisabar...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >news:7b6a22b3-609f-4863...@18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>
> > I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
>
> Was it another of your lies?
> I hope you are not referring to me as I did not start the thread!!!!
Jahbulon
May 6, 2012, 3:18:51 PM5/6/12
to
"DVH" <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote in news:upzpr.238332$Sb1.1...@fx03.am4:
>>> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>>
>> I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
>
> Was it another of your lies?
It may have been in error, but I do try hard not to tell lies.
>>> Personally, I think there is no Ore link to the McFrauds.
>>
>> I wish I had not made the original post in this thread.
>
> Was it another of your lies?
Mentalguy2k8
May 6, 2012, 3:41:38 PM5/6/12
to
"Janitor of Lunacy" <zo...@zonk.com> wrote in message
news:yRypr.446173$nF6.2...@fx10.am4...
believing a theory that has no basis in known fact.
There is no more evidence to support an abduction as there is to support the
theory that Gerry McCann is a shapeshifting lizard - ie, none.
GB
May 6, 2012, 4:17:18 PM5/6/12
to
sutartsorric wrote:
> Ok, so every theory about Madeleine is a conspiracy, except for the
> one you believe in?
Some theories are more plausible than others. Given the lack of information,
> Ok, so every theory about Madeleine is a conspiracy, except for the
> one you believe in?
I think it is wrong (and very hurtful to the McCanns) to speculate in
public.
Jahbulon
May 6, 2012, 4:15:53 PM5/6/12
to
"Mentalguy2k8" <Mental...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:jo6k5a$tme$1...@dont-email.me:
> There is no more evidence to support an abduction
> as there is to support the theory that Gerry McCann
> is a shapeshifting lizard - ie, none.
Less, in fact, because one day Gerry McCann pretends to be a practicing
Roman Catholic, the next he's back to the Freemason religion.
news:jo6k5a$tme$1...@dont-email.me:
> There is no more evidence to support an abduction
> as there is to support the theory that Gerry McCann
> is a shapeshifting lizard - ie, none.
Roman Catholic, the next he's back to the Freemason religion.
sutartsorric
May 6, 2012, 4:43:46 PM5/6/12
to
And whose fault is that for making every detail of the abduction
public, at every opportunity possible?
Those people who choose to use wall to wall media coverage of their
private lives, including appeals which raise many thousands of pounds,
cannot complain if the public begin to wonder exactly how their
donations are being spent.
The only hurt that the McCanns are suffering has been brought on their
lives purely by their own selfish and greedy actions, and deep down
I'm sure they know that, but are probably in denial.
Jahbulon
May 6, 2012, 4:52:53 PM5/6/12
to
sutartsorric <sutart...@googlemail.com> wrote in
news:53ec4d0e-45d5-411e...@a5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com:
> And whose fault is that for making every detail of
> the abduction public, at every opportunity possible?
Do you mean like way Kate McCann called Sky News before she told the local
police in Portugal?
> The only hurt that the McCanns are suffering [ . . . ].
Would not be the free tickets Kate and Brother Gerry secured to see Everton
play Liverpool in the FA cup semi-final?
What help did that give to the search for Madeleine? FA?
news:53ec4d0e-45d5-411e...@a5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com:
> And whose fault is that for making every detail of
> the abduction public, at every opportunity possible?
police in Portugal?
> The only hurt that the McCanns are suffering [ . . . ].
Would not be the free tickets Kate and Brother Gerry secured to see Everton
play Liverpool in the FA cup semi-final?
What help did that give to the search for Madeleine? FA?
sutartsorric
May 6, 2012, 5:02:53 PM5/6/12
to
On May 6, 9:52 pm, Jahbulon <inva...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
hospitality seats which when I looked started at £395 per person.
> sutartsorric <sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote innews:53ec4d0e-45d5-411e...@a5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com:
>
> > And whose fault is that for making every detail of
> > the abduction public, at every opportunity possible?
>
> Do you mean like way Kate McCann called Sky News before she told the local
> police in Portugal?
>
> > The only hurt that the McCanns are suffering [ . . . ].
>
> Would not be the free tickets Kate and Brother Gerry secured to see Everton
> play Liverpool in the FA cup semi-final?
>
Not just ordinary free tickets, but they were sitting in the
>
> > And whose fault is that for making every detail of
> > the abduction public, at every opportunity possible?
>
> Do you mean like way Kate McCann called Sky News before she told the local
> police in Portugal?
>
> > The only hurt that the McCanns are suffering [ . . . ].
>
> Would not be the free tickets Kate and Brother Gerry secured to see Everton
> play Liverpool in the FA cup semi-final?
>
hospitality seats which when I looked started at £395 per person.
Mentalguy2k8
May 6, 2012, 5:12:24 PM5/6/12
to
news:a56a6fe5-58f8-4daa...@m10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
Maybe their millionaire friend paid for them, the guy who has *allegedly*
been interfering with and intimidating witnesses who didn't sing from the
"abduction" hymn sheet:
http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/category/the-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann/brian-kennedy/
been interfering with and intimidating witnesses who didn't sing from the
"abduction" hymn sheet:
http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/category/the-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann/brian-kennedy/
Jahbulon
May 6, 2012, 6:58:26 PM5/6/12
to
sutartsorric <sutart...@googlemail.com> wrote in
news:a56a6fe5-58f8-4daa...@m10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com:
> Not just ordinary free tickets, but they were
> sitting in the hospitality seats which when I
> looked started at £395 per person.
Which of course Kate and Brother Gerry McCann needed because Madeleine
might be hiding not in a libel court, but on the pitch at Wembley?
news:a56a6fe5-58f8-4daa...@m10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com:
> Not just ordinary free tickets, but they were
> sitting in the hospitality seats which when I
> looked started at £395 per person.
might be hiding not in a libel court, but on the pitch at Wembley?
Jahbulon
May 8, 2012, 7:31:30 PM5/8/12
to
Nigel Oldfield <WMCritica...@googlemail.com> wrote in
news:jo3r1h$iq7$1...@dont-email.me:
> Not necessarily, but, I too, should like a source.
I wish I had not posted that now.
news:jo3r1h$iq7$1...@dont-email.me:
> Not necessarily, but, I too, should like a source.
I wish I had not posted that now.
Cynic
May 9, 2012, 10:21:11 AM5/9/12
to
On Sat, 05 May 2012 19:28:33 +0100, Nigel Oldfield
<WMCritica...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Can anyone, here, confirm that this is for real?
>
>http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MCCANNS_BACKGROUND.htm
>
>"This information belongs to the Ministério Público in Portimão, Portugal.
>It was released to the public on 4 August 2008 in accordance with
>Portuguese Law"
>
>I would hate for the gentleman, as named, to be defamed here, and by
>such a website.
That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
Substituting an OpenDNS server brings up the website.
--
Cynic
<WMCritica...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Can anyone, here, confirm that this is for real?
>
>http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MCCANNS_BACKGROUND.htm
>
>"This information belongs to the Ministério Público in Portimão, Portugal.
>It was released to the public on 4 August 2008 in accordance with
>Portuguese Law"
>
>I would hate for the gentleman, as named, to be defamed here, and by
>such a website.
That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
Substituting an OpenDNS server brings up the website.
--
Cynic
Jahbulon
May 9, 2012, 11:14:17 AM5/9/12
to
cyni...@yahoo.co.uk (Cynic) wrote in news:4faa7bd8.18200500@localhost:
> That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
I thought you had cable?
> That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
The Todal
May 9, 2012, 11:42:36 AM5/9/12
to
On 9/5/12 16:14, Jahbulon wrote:
> cyni...@yahoo.co.uk (Cynic) wrote in news:4faa7bd8.18200500@localhost:
>
>> That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
>
> I thought you had cable?
>
He did, but the Freemasons have tampered with it. Only the purest
> cyni...@yahoo.co.uk (Cynic) wrote in news:4faa7bd8.18200500@localhost:
>
>> That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
>
> I thought you had cable?
>
fibre-optic cable is able to resist Masonic interference. Masons are
copper-based life forms.
Jahbulon
May 9, 2012, 1:11:28 PM5/9/12
to
The Todal <deadm...@beeb.net> wrote in news:a0vhjdFrj0U1
@mid.individual.net:
> He did, but the Freemasons have tampered with it.
> Only the purest fibre-optic cable is able to
> resist Masonic interference. Masons are copper-based
> life forms.
Never a truer word spoken in jest: in the current decade a self-declared
Freemason demanded information from me about my Internet connection.
@mid.individual.net:
> He did, but the Freemasons have tampered with it.
> Only the purest fibre-optic cable is able to
> resist Masonic interference. Masons are copper-based
> life forms.
Freemason demanded information from me about my Internet connection.
Tony Dragon
May 9, 2012, 1:22:49 PM5/9/12
to
On 09/05/2012 18:11, Jahbulon wrote:
> The Todal<deadm...@beeb.net> wrote in news:a0vhjdFrj0U1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> He did, but the Freemasons have tampered with it.
>> Only the purest fibre-optic cable is able to
>> resist Masonic interference. Masons are copper-based
>> life forms.
>
> Never a truer word spoken in jest: in the current decade a self-declared
> Freemason demanded information from me about my Internet connection.
>
Details?
> The Todal<deadm...@beeb.net> wrote in news:a0vhjdFrj0U1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> He did, but the Freemasons have tampered with it.
>> Only the purest fibre-optic cable is able to
>> resist Masonic interference. Masons are copper-based
>> life forms.
>
> Never a truer word spoken in jest: in the current decade a self-declared
> Freemason demanded information from me about my Internet connection.
>
Cynic
May 9, 2012, 2:11:23 PM5/9/12
to
On Wed, 09 May 2012 15:14:17 GMT, Jahbulon
<inv...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
>> That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
>I thought you had cable?
I wish! There is no cable in my area, so I'm stuck with ADSL2 at
<inv...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
>> That URL returns a 404 error using my ISP's DNS server (BeUnlimited).
>I thought you had cable?
present.
Still, I chose a place close to an exchange and get 21Mbps from
BeUnlimited, which is pretty good for what I want and much better than
the 4Mbps I was getting on the boat, but I'd snap up anything
significantly faster. Which may well happen around October when BT
has said they will be installing fibre. If that can deliver
significantly better speeds, I'll switch to BT. It's only FTTC
though, not FTTP.
--
Cynic
Jahbulon
May 9, 2012, 2:34:10 PM5/9/12
to
cyni...@yahoo.co.uk (Cynic) wrote in news:4faab20a.32074046@localhost:
> I wish!
By how much does ADSL lag behind cable?
> If that can deliver
> significantly better speeds, I'll switch to BT.
Does not BT OpenReach have to make its network available to all retailers?
> I wish!
By how much does ADSL lag behind cable?
> If that can deliver
> significantly better speeds, I'll switch to BT.
Cynic
May 10, 2012, 8:28:52 AM5/10/12
to
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:34:10 GMT, Jahbulon
<inv...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
>> I wish!
>By how much does ADSL lag behind cable?
By a considerable amount in terms of its capacity unless you are very
<inv...@invalid.invalid.net> wrote:
>> I wish!
>By how much does ADSL lag behind cable?
close to the exchange. Realisable speeds depend on how many people
are being supplied via a single cable. One other factor is that the
upload speed is not considerably slower than the download speed, which
makes a big difference when you are using the Internet for certain
things (such as having a private server).
Fibre is much faster still, and there is no sharing of the physical
fibre link.
>> If that can deliver
>> significantly better speeds, I'll switch to BT.
>Does not BT OpenReach have to make its network available to all retailers?
to supply a service to every area BT has a service. Unbundling the
local loop involves considerable capital equipment costs, and the
equipment needed for fibre is different to that for copper.
BeUnlimited have some plans to take over fibre, but have stated that
the plans are not immediate and it will be at least a year before they
commence trials.
--
Cynic
0 new messages