Ardy bones shown evolutions is fake.
FRANKIE LEE
and scientists who shared to us,that those finds confirmed the
existence of evolution process which took place millions of years,a
science fiction theory for our understanding.
For the first time in our modern history,scientists never go to school
to study science,but profess to be scientists.
They have never heard of "decay",and believes our natural habitat is
the best refrigeration which can keep bones from decaying.For someone
who can figure out with insight into claiming million of years the age
of the bones,when they saw a bone, just by looking at the bones,all
forensic scientists must have gone asleep.
It was the audacity of exaggerated assumption beyond the pale.
All these decades,many bones were found to be hoax which try to
confirm Evolution theories,and those bones were later confirmed to be
present day animal bones,still it doesn't deter the faithful to try
again to deceive our world.But have you heard the media telling you
how many times those supposedly findings were fake?How many times they
hide the facts?
I wonder what kind of decay would be seen if a bone is left for a
hundred years,or perhaps a thousand.What would happen if it is ten
thousand years?Biologists suppose to have knowledge on all these
facts,but when come to some bones which may try to link to the false
theory of evolution,suddenly all rationales and scientific facts on
decadence of bones,and Rotting,became a foreign subject to them.
At least fraud-scientist are smarter to use outer space Rocks to tell
us that it survive millions of years,and when challenged at least they
can say I am saying the age of the outer space rock 4.5 billions years
but just mere guesses to attribute it to the earth age,but to say that
animal bones could survive that power of Decay in a million
years,...through a mere ten thousand years,....Egyptian mummy's skills
in preservation must be put to shame.
Human civilizations is about 5000 years.This is facts and observable
evidence undisputed by all.If there is any word to describe those
silly biologists,indeed they are exaggerating,making false claims to
more than 10000 years of human civilization much less a million.
Evolutions Theory was already discredited long ago.
AleXX
outer space.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaJgsxFX_mE
"FRANKIE LEE" <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:da5f69da-6d7d-486d...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
auda...@hotmail.com
huh? Your thought processes and writing skills seem to fossilize
nicely - dax
The Cynic
> BBC has just aired on the discovery of Ardy bones in Africa.Professors
> and scientists who shared to us,that those finds confirmed the
> existence of evolution process which took place millions of years,a
> science fiction theory for our understanding.
>
Freakie! Your stupidity should earn you "The Super Idiot of SCS"
award.
The BBC article is here. It never dismissed evolution. Read the third
sentence. BTW, nowhere it is mentioned the earth is 5,000 years old as
harped by dedicated fools. LOL
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8285180.stm
An ancient human-like creature that may be a direct ancestor to our
species has been described by researchers.
The assessment of the 4.4-million-year-old animal called Ardipithecus
ramidus is reported in the journal Science.
Even if it is not on the direct line to us, it offers new insights
into how we evolved from the common ancestor we share with chimps, the
team says.
Fossils of A. ramidus were first found in Ethiopia in 1992, but it has
taken 17 years to assess their significance.
The most important specimen is a partial skeleton of a female
nicknamed "Ardi".
(refer the BBC website for the full article.)
Bill M
"FRANKIE LEE" <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:da5f69da-6d7d-486d...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Free Lunch
in alt.talk.creationism:
>You have an over active and stupid imagination. Get an education!
If he had an education, he wouldn't be able to write that nonsense.
>
>"FRANKIE LEE" <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:da5f69da-6d7d-486d...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
...
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
What a good job you are doing of parodying a religious nut who worships
ignorance and refuses to learn. It takes a lot of work to conclude that
evolution does not happen when yet another of the millions of pieces of
evidence for evolution is discovered. Thanks for the laugh.
Frankie Lee
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:42:09 +0100, "Bill M" <wm...@bellsouth.net> wrote
> in alt.talk.creationism:
>
> >You have an over active and stupid imagination. Get an education!
>
> If he had an education, he wouldn't be able to write that nonsense.
>
>
>
> >news:da5f69da-6d7d-486d...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> ...
***Since you cannot show where I have written nonsense,why not use
ridicule again?This silly ploy only make you silly.Only fools like you
are replying my post with nonsense.That is good for others.
Frankie Lee
***You have a silly reputation of making half-truths and slander out
from nowhere.
1,Since when did I ever imply BBC dismissed evolutions?Can you quote
my words?
2,Since when did I mentioned that BBC said the earth is 5000 years
old?
Did you hear the discussion in details those fools had with BBC host
like I have?
I understand why you stand by my side,hoping your falseness to give
light to my truths.No thanks,anyway.Readers want truths not cynical
remarks and stupid words.
No need to be a continued liar,exposing the facts that... Frankie's
words are superior than Cynic,many times over.
bear
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saokTRIg0qA
View this video while you are so busy and pre-occupied if this world
is only 6000 years old.
The Cynic
How to pinpoint your portion of nonsense when your entire piece is
nothing but nonsense. LOL
The Cynic
Can you read and comprehend English? Go and re-read my response,
understand it and then reply, you imbecile.
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Others know that you are writing nonsense. No one is supporting your
silliness.
Frankie Lee
***You should apologize for being a liar.Period.Still denying?Why you
didn't address the issue of which I mentioned?Evade the issue?Calling
yourself imbecile?What obnoxious idiot you have prove yourself,and
dare to be reasonable here?
You have no decencies and sense of any honest virtues,a foul
idiot.Your place should be on those dirty websites.Apologize and then
I may enlighten you.
Frankie Lee
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 23:05:22 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
***Again,there was no refutation on the points I address,but sidelines
into areas where,personal attacks became your sole interest.If you
have any brains,surely you can figure out that my message must be too
superior for you to side line.
Frankie Lee
***If my entire piece is nonsense,you mean you can not pin point any?
Are you not allowing sane readers to see your poor comprehension
skills and excuses that befit a fool?
Frankie Lee
***1,You have already lied.You are a habitual liar.You already implied
falsehood on my post.I challenged your lying words,and openly calling
you a liar,and you could response by evading the main-issue?
2, Where is your apology?Since you have no defense but convicted by me
of your lying habit,why run away from the issue,and my clear
accusations on where you lied?
My previous post where you pretend like a fool:
***You have a silly reputation of making half-truths and slander out
from nowhere.
1,Since when did I ever imply BBC dismissed evolutions?Can you quote
my words?
2,Since when did I mentioned that BBC said the earth is 5000 years
old?
Did you hear the discussion in details those fools had with BBC host
like I have?
I understand why you stand by my side,hoping your falseness to give
light to my truths.No thanks,anyway.Readers want truths not cynical
remarks and stupid words.
No need to be a continued liar,exposing the facts that... Frankie's
words are superior than Cynic,many times over.
---------------------
I have shown where and how you lied over a very long period of
time,and each and every time you evade the
issue,use"moron",Imbecile",etc...to cover your own most stupid
comments.
You have never appear to be sane and decent over a very long course of
time.Your colours of being an Idiot,a bad person and an evil nut has
been evident.You are a fruitcake,a true description of you in every
sense of the English word.
You have never listen to my advice for you to stop calling yourself an
Idiot here,and to change your name.
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
You said nothing that wasn't obviously refuted already. You are the one
who has chosen to repeat falsehoods. I don't care why you do it. Maybe
you are just a kid mocking Christians. Maybe you are a fool who has been
sucked into the most foolish lies that folks like AIG and the DI tell. I
don't care. You have stated nothing that needs to be refuted.
You are your own worst enemy.
The Cynic
Herein you have exposed your inability to rationalize or think
logically. Don't your realize that you have answered your own
question.
> Are you not allowing sane readers to see your poor comprehension
> skills and excuses that befit a fool?
You have provided a very good example of your expression. LOL
Frankie Lee
***I have shown u where you lied,and to-date where was your defense or
no defense?Apologize and move on.
Frankie Lee
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:50:35 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
***Which of my message is seen as mocking Christian?I am a Christian.I
have chosen to repeat falsehood or you did?Ya,I have nothing for you
to refute,because you are found to be a liar.Or,there is nothing one
can refute my powerful words of truth!
Don't pretend to be smart.You have nothing to add on ...to my words
debunking evolution theory...
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>On Oct 4, 6:55�pm, The Cynic <i.thecy...@gmail.com> wrote:
You are deluding yourself, but no one else has fallen for your claims.
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Each one of them that makes Christian look like ignoramuses who refuse
to learn anything about science.
>I am a Christian.
So you claim. I cannot verify that from your posts here.
>I have chosen to repeat falsehood or you did?Ya,I have nothing for you
>to refute,because you are found to be a liar.Or,there is nothing one
>can refute my powerful words of truth!
You have offered no words of truth. You know that.
>Don't pretend to be smart.You have nothing to add on ...to my words
>debunking evolution theory...
You have not debunked anything. That is clear to everyone reading your
humorous claims.
Ralph
You couldn't enlighten the north end of a south bound mule.
D-Lite
It states in the bible that a fog cleared up after the flood and there
was suddenly much more light on planet earth.
This explains why people where getting much older in the days of
Genesis. They where preserved better.
Now the scientists find stuff that is pre-flood and suddenly think it
is millions of years old.
It isnt. It is only around 6000 years old. Which is old though ;)
Free Lunch
wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>The scientist dont belief in the Noahs flood.
They have evidence that Noah's Flood did not happen. It's not about
faith or belief. It's about facts.
>It states in the bible that a fog cleared up after the flood and there
>was suddenly much more light on planet earth.
Chapter and verse, please.
>This explains why people where getting much older in the days of
>Genesis. They where preserved better.
No. Those stories about ages are not accurate.
>Now the scientists find stuff that is pre-flood and suddenly think it
>is millions of years old.
Your profound ignorance is noted.
>It isnt. It is only around 6000 years old. Which is old though ;)
You are teaching a false doctrine.
You are a fool to believe Frankie Lee and the lies he tells.