Colanth defends NAMBLA
J
news:sidh0758ebpedpi3s...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:40 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>"W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.2871278de...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3gs4pto
>
>>From the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in NYC. You call this "decency"?
>.
> http://tiny.cc/52xzt
>
>
> No, equal rights isn't decent - to turds like you.
>
> Hey, if you don't like it, stay in New Jersey. Maybe the mosquitoes
> will want you. (The new crop is as big as 757s.)
You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you endorse
such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The church
is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties to
such perversion. What's your excuse?
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
Mike Painter
>
>
>
> You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
> endorse such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal
> rights'. The church is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities
> about any guilty parties to such perversion. What's your excuse?
>
I am especially interested in ones that happened before a civil action was
brought.
• R. L. Measures.
>"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>news:sidh0758ebpedpi3s...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:40 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>news:MPG.2871278de...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3gs4pto
>>
>>>From the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in NYC. You call this "decency"?
>>.
>> http://tiny.cc/52xzt
>>
>>
>> No, equal rights isn't decent - to turds like you.
>>
>> Hey, if you don't like it, stay in New Jersey. Maybe the mosquitoes
>> will want you. (The new crop is as big as 757s.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you endorse
>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The church
>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties to
>such perversion. ...
** only after 80+ years of hiding priests who played hide the sausage
with altar-boys.
--
Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
• R. L. Measures.
<md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
• Good one Mike.
J
". R. L. Measures." <r...@somis.org> wrote in message
news:rL-300611...@10.0.1.3...
Better late than never. At least the RCC doesn't call members of NAMBLA
decent and deserving of equal rights. That sounds Chilton-esque.
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
• R. L. Measures.
** However "J", as "Duke" so perceptively pointed out, homosexual
altar-boys and homosexual priests are a match made in Heaven.
Colanth
>"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>news:sidh0758ebpedpi3s...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:40 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>news:MPG.2871278de...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3gs4pto
>>
>>>From the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in NYC. You call this "decency"?
>>.
>> http://tiny.cc/52xzt
>> No, equal rights isn't decent - to turds like you.
>> Hey, if you don't like it, stay in New Jersey. Maybe the mosquitoes
>> will want you. (The new crop is as big as 757s.)
>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you endorse
>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'.
Being gay? No, it doesn't "deserve equal rights", any more than
having blue eyes does. It's just something that - unless you're
romantically involved with a gay person, is none of your business.
> The church
>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties to
>such perversion.
After decades of making sure that they were moved out of the
jurisdiction the instant the Church found out. That's abetting a
felon at best.
> What's your excuse?
For what? Not sucking up to a Nazi turd child rapist apologist? It's
called morals - something you know nothing about.
--
"Anyone who can worship a trinity and insist that his religion is a
monotheism can believe anything... just give him time to rationalize
it." - Robert Heinlein
Colanth
>". R. L. Measures." <r...@somis.org> wrote in message
>news:rL-300611...@10.0.1.3...
>> In article <4qg061....@news.alt.net>, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>>endorse
>>>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
>>>church
>>>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties
>>>to
>>>such perversion. ...
>>
>> ** only after 80+ years of hiding priests who played hide the sausage
>> with altar-boys.
>Better late than never.
Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
morality - any morality.
> At least the RCC doesn't call members of NAMBLA
>decent and deserving of equal rights.
Equal rights, yes. The right to rape children? No, the Church
doesn't get that.
--
"There is nothing frightening about an eternal dreamless sleep. Surely
it is better than eternal torment in Hell and eternal boredom in
Heaven."- Isaac Asimov
• R. L. Measures.
<col...@pern.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:15:58 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:sidh0758ebpedpi3s...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:40 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:MPG.2871278de...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3gs4pto
>>>
>>>>From the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in NYC. You call this "decency"?
>>>.
>>> http://tiny.cc/52xzt
>
>>> No, equal rights isn't decent - to turds like you.
>
>>> Hey, if you don't like it, stay in New Jersey. Maybe the mosquitoes
>>> will want you. (The new crop is as big as 757s.)
>
>>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you endorse
>>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'.
>
>Being gay? No, it doesn't "deserve equal rights", any more than
>having blue eyes does. It's just something that - unless you're
>romantically involved with a gay person, is none of your business.
>
• Hmmmm . . . well maybe he is C.
• R. L. Measures.
<col...@pern.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:20:28 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>". R. L. Measures." <r...@somis.org> wrote in message
>>news:rL-300611...@10.0.1.3...
>>> In article <4qg061....@news.alt.net>, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>>>endorse
>>>>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
>>>>church
>>>>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties
>>>>to
>>>>such perversion. ...
>>>
>>> ** only after 80+ years of hiding priests who played hide the sausage
>>> with altar-boys.
>
>>Better late than never.
>
>Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
>days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
>morality - any morality.
>
• Do they qualify for evil morality ?
Colanth
wrote:
That would be "immorality".
--
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about ways to harm our country and our people and
neither do we." - George Bush
Colanth
wrote:
>In article <dukr0751dogpcg1q4...@4ax.com>, Colanth
He's a wannabe - he wants to be involved with an actual gay person.
But most gays are pretty intelligent, so he just has to reconcile
himself to live out his life loving his fist.
--
"Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or he can but does not
want to. If he wants to but cannot he is impotent. If he can but does
not want to, he is wicked. If he neither can nor wants to, then he is
both powerless and wicked." - Epicurus, Greek philosopher, circa 300
B.C.
• R. L. Measures.
<col...@pern.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 08:11:22 -0700, r...@somis.org (• R. L. Measures.)
>wrote:
>
>>In article <58lr079o9iq0dgs54...@4ax.com>, Colanth
>><col...@pern.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:20:28 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>". R. L. Measures." <r...@somis.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:rL-300611...@10.0.1.3...
>>>>> In article <4qg061....@news.alt.net>, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>>>>>endorse
>>>>>>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
>>>>>>church
>>>>>>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>such perversion. ...
>>>>>
>>>>> ** only after 80+ years of hiding priests who played hide the sausage
>>>>> with altar-boys.
>>>
>>>>Better late than never.
>>>
>>>Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
>>>days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
>>>morality - any morality.
>>>
>>• Do they qualify for evil morality ?
>
>That would be "immorality".
• same shit.
• R. L. Measures.
IT Helpdesk
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:20:28 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>". R. L. Measures." <r...@somis.org> wrote in message
>>news:rL-300611...@10.0.1.3...
>>> In article <4qg061....@news.alt.net>, "J" <jvis...@live.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>>>endorse
>>>>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
>>>>church
>>>>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty
>>>>parties
>>>>to
>>>>such perversion. ...
>>>
>>> ** only after 80+ years of hiding priests who played hide the sausage
>>> with altar-boys.
>
>>Better late than never.
>
> Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
> days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
> morality - any morality.
>
It would seem then, that *you* are the one claiming moral superiority.
Mike Painter
<snip>
>>
>> You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>> endorse such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal
>> rights'. The church is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities
>> about any guilty parties to such perversion. ...
>
> ** only after 80+ years of hiding priests who played hide the sausage
> with altar-boys.
If you added a zero and multiplied by two, you might be closer.
"Pope Leo X had more exotic tastes. Famed for his extravagant lifestyle, he
was entertained by young boys leaping naked from cakes. When the new Pope
entered Florence in triumph, he had a young boy painted gold, from head to
toe, who paraded through the streets. It was pure propaganda, implying the
return of a golden age under the rule of the Medici. The boy died shortly
afterwards, poisoned by the gold paint on his skin but the papal
celebrations went on for days."
(Leo was a cardinal at 13...)
james g. keegan jr.
"IT Helpdesk" <ITHel...@deleted.com> wrote:
> "Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
> news:58lr079o9iq0dgs54...@4ax.com...
> >>Better late than never.
> >
> > Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
> > days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
> > morality - any morality.
> >
>
> It would seem then, that *you* are the one claiming moral superiority.
only to an illiterate imbecile.
• R. L. Measures.
<md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
** Christ's Vicar?
Colanth
wrote:
J with a lass? You jest.
Colanth
I don't have to be a woman to recognize who's not one.
Colanth
He's not illiterate, he can read. He's incognate.
Colanth
wrote:
>In article <lr2dneju5e-xuJPT...@giganews.com>, "Mike Painter"
Not vicar, but it sounds the same - licker.
Budikka666
> "Colanth" <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:sidh0758ebpedpi3s...@4ax.com...
>
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:40 -0400, "J" <jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>
> >>"W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> >>news:MPG.2871278de...@news.west.earthlink.net...
> >>>http://tinyurl.com/3gs4pto
>
> >>From the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in NYC. You call this "decency"?
> >.
> >http://tiny.cc/52xzt
>
> > No, equal rights isn't decent - to turds like you.
>
> > Hey, if you don't like it, stay in New Jersey. Maybe the mosquitoes
> > will want you. (The new crop is as big as 757s.)
>
> You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you endorse
> such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The church
> is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties to
> such perversion. What's your excuse?
This from the liar who is apparently forgetting that the Catholic
church actively covered-up and thereby facilitated child rape and
abuse for decades?
You really are the lowest scum in the scum bucket aren't you? Too
chicken to admit you're a theist and yet you defend the church no
matter how depraved and evil it is, don't you?
Budikka
james g. keegan jr.
� R. L. Measures.
� R. L. Measures.
J
"Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:400e1a36-3fc3-408d...@ct4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 30, 9:15 pm, "J" <jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> > "Colanth" <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
> >
> > endorse
> > such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
> > church
> > is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty
> > parties to
> > such perversion. What's your excuse?
> This from the liar who is apparently forgetting that the Catholic
> church actively covered-up and thereby facilitated child rape and
> abuse for decades?
> You really are the lowest scum in the scum bucket aren't you? Too
> chicken to admit you're a theist and yet you defend the church no
> matter how depraved and evil it is, don't you?
I am not a theist but I am an egalitarian. That means I believe ALL sides
have a right to be heard and in this ng, only Catholic-bashers feel that
they are entitled. My mission is to provide a voice for those who suffer but
are unpopular.
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
(�`�.� Craig Chilton �.���) <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com>
"Jon Young"/"Auric Hellman" <jvis...@live.com> spewed...
> "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> "Jon Young"/"Auric Hellman" <jvis...@live.com> spewed...
>>> "Colanth" <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>>> You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>> endorse such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'.
>>> The church is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any
>>> guilty parties to such perversion. What's your excuse?
>> This from the liar who is apparently forgetting that the Catholic
>> church actively covered-up and thereby facilitated child rape and
>> abuse for decades?
>>
>> You really are the lowest scum in the scum bucket aren't you? Too
>> chicken to admit you're a theist and yet you defend the church no
>> matter how depraved and evil it is, don't you?
> I am not a theist but I am an egalitarian.
No Irony Meter within 12,000 miles survived that!
<remaining swill flushed>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
The RACISM of "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner"
"Problem with those negroes was that they were too slow, lazy, and
stupid...By the time the shines boardered the transportation available,
there was too many people at the same time
looking to leave. Who's fault is that?
From: "Auric Hellman" <adhe...@volcanomail.com>, illiterate kook.
Newsgroups:
seattle.politics,nyc.politics,wash.politics,tx.politics,ca.politics
Subject: Re: KATRINA & USA Ethnic cleansing
Date: 28 Aug 2006 16:47:31 -0700
Message-ID: <1156808851.5...@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
LC~ Always enjoys a display of faux compassion from sociopath "J/Auric".
"America, with the exception of the jews and niggers, are not a
nation of pigs."
From: "J" <bi...@ass.com>
Message-ID: <1f4mfa....@news.alt.net>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Zacharias Mulletstein
"J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote in message
news:4qira9....@news.alt.net...
Quit lying. Everyone knows you're a fox Christian.
--
I am a Fundamentalist Christian Pentecostal Warrior for the One lamb virgin,
Jesus Christ.
Zacharias Mulletstein
"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:dukr0751dogpcg1q4...@4ax.com...
I KNEW you were Raytard. Quit denying it bitch.
(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com>
Kreiss der Vaquitte <kre...@der.vaquitte> wrote:
> Part of the reason we oppose homosexalty is because we are
> egalitarians. All true Christians are egalitarians & thats why your
> not.
You are a DELUSIONAL *LIAR* on all counts.
THUS, you are a worthless TROLL.
+-----------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| Management | /`-vvv-'\
+------------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\ \
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
=================================
MM
"(¯`·.¸ DELUSIONAL *LIAR* on all counts Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) .. NO FACTS
Support Chilton's Trolling -
IT IS JUST AN EXCUSE FOR HIS ADVERTISING .. " <xan...@sbt.net> parroted /
trolled in message news:kt0u07t7mu24urpvc...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 01:45:36 -0400,
> Kreiss der Vaquitte <kre...@der.vaquitte> wrote:
>
>
>> Part of the reason we oppose homosexalty is because we are
>> egalitarians. All true Christians are egalitarians & thats why your
>> not.
>
>
Perhaps you have not gotten AIDS yet. But you will still die one day
anyway. When you do die, you will stand before God, and you will be forced
to answer for your wicked homo sin. God will judge you in that day by
having you cast into the Lake of Fire called Hell. This will be the just
reward by God upon you for your error.
Fuckwit (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) still trolling and spamming.
10,000 irrelevant adverising spams to 254 groups in only 45 days.
What a moronic, subhuman bigot - add fagot and assecories to murder of
babies.
MORONIC FAGOTS will just keep on LYING and making
complete FOOLS of themselves. Like the moron who
started THIS thread (Craig Chilton) just did.
>
> +-----------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
> | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
> | FEED THE TROL | :=.' - - '.=:
> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) '=(\ 9 9 /)='
(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com>
"MM" <m...@mm.invalid> wrote:
> Perhaps you have not gotten AIDS yet.
Never WILL, either! My parents raised NO kids dumb
enough to take the requisite risks.
<hateful BULLCRAP flushed>
So, Readers, for THIS loser, TOO ---
+-----------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| Management | /`-vvv-'\
+------------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\ \
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
=================================
IT Helpdesk
news:jgkeegan-6D7ABA...@news.individual.net...
Whoa!
James didn't understand the meaning of "illiterate"!
william mosco
> In article <kvks07dq073k53717783fdbijr6ps55...@4ax.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> Colanth <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:05:35 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
>
> > >In article <iul9jm$mh...@tornado.tornevall.net>,
> > > "IT Helpdesk" <ITHelpd...@deleted.com> wrote:
>
> > >> "Colanth" <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
> > >>news:58lr079o9iq0dgs54...@4ax.com...
>
> > >> >>Better late than never.
>
> > >> > Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
> > >> > days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
> > >> > morality - any morality.
>
> > >> It would seem then, that *you* are the one claiming moral superiority.
>
> > >only to an illiterate imbecile.
>
> > He's not illiterate, he can read. He's incognate.
>
> ok
jimmy has no problem here agreeing with a blatant lie.
james g. keegan jr.
<1eda082a-1352-43d9...@x1g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
and here billy makes a silly claim he is not equipped to back up.
james g. keegan jr.
"IT Helpdesk" <ITHel...@deleted.com> wrote:
> "james g. keegan jr." <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jgkeegan-6D7ABA...@news.individual.net...
> > In article <kvks07dq073k53717...@4ax.com>,
> > Colanth <col...@pern.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:05:35 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
> >> <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <iul9jm$mh5$1...@tornado.tornevall.net>,
> >> > "IT Helpdesk" <ITHel...@deleted.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
> >> >> news:58lr079o9iq0dgs54...@4ax.com...
> >> >
> >> >> >>Better late than never.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Sorry, no. The Church claims moral superiority, so 1 day late is 2
> >> >> > days too long. 80 years? The Church no longer has a claim to
> >> >> > morality - any morality.
> >>
> >> >> It would seem then, that *you* are the one claiming moral superiority.
> >>
> >> >only to an illiterate imbecile.
> >>
> >> He's not illiterate, he can read. He's incognate.
> >
> > ok
>
> Whoa!
> James didn't understand the meaning of "illiterate"!
still in projection mode, i see.
william mosco
well the that's the first time i saw you let a blatant lie slide with
an "ok". appeared to me as an agreement...
Budikka666
> "Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message
>
> news:400e1a36-3fc3-408d...@ct4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 30, 9:15 pm, "J" <jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> > > "Colanth" <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>
> > > You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
> > > endorse
> > > such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
> > > church
> > > is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty
> > > parties to
> > > such perversion. What's your excuse?
> > This from the liar who is apparently forgetting that the Catholic
> > church actively covered-up and thereby facilitated child rape and
> > abuse for decades?
> > You really are the lowest scum in the scum bucket aren't you? Too
> > chicken to admit you're a theist and yet you defend the church no
> > matter how depraved and evil it is, don't you?
>
> I am not a theist but I am an egalitarian.
Is that like Presbyterian? lol!
You *exclusively* defend and promote theist positions and you *never*
argue against them no matter how irrational or insupportable they
are. There's no egalitarianism in that; that, for all practical
purposes, notwithstanding what LIES you spew, makes you a theist,
period.
> That means I believe ALL sides
> have a right to be heard and in this ng,
THIS newsgroup you worthless LOSER? You're spamming FOUR newsgroups
with your juvenile inane horseshit as always.
What, *exactly* does your drooling trash have to do with alt.abortion,
which group you routinely spam (which normally I trim, but not on this
occasion)?
Go read the FAQ jackass. This (a.a.) isn't your newsgroup. We don't
need your sad and transparent trash posted here. And don't pretend
you're defending anything you pathetic little LIAR. ***YOU*** started
*this* thread. You're not *defending* anything - you're promoting
your own theist agenda, period.
> only Catholic-bashers feel that
> they are entitled. My mission is to provide a voice for those who suffer but
> are unpopular.
Ri-ight, because as you clearly imply here, the Catholics are so few
and so weak that there isn't a one of 'em who can stand up for
themselves and they need your pathetic, transparent, childish LIES and
cowardice to represent 'em? lol! You really are the lowest, aren't
you?
Did you hear that, Chicken Patrick? Did you hear that Duck & Run
Duke? J Young says you're hopeless without him! Well, I guess he's
right where you two are concerned....
So the Catholics are so useless that they need you to LIE about child
rape for them? Not in defense of anyhtign we posted to these four
newsgroups, but in a thread *you* began for no reaosn at all but to
puff yourself up with your childish "mission" to be Superman
whitewashing that appalling Catholic disgrace with LIES that aren't
even white because they "can't handle the truth"! lol!
I see you failed to address what I actually posted as usual, instead
chosing to whine and RUN like the stinking diarrhea you are. I
sincerely hope the Catholics think you're helping, because I see you
doing nothing but making the theist side look like unrepentant
dirtbags.
On second thought, by all means keep it up. lol!
Budikka
james g. keegan jr.
<15d4335b-872c-498e...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
as predicted, billy can't back up his claim and now, coward that he is,
he runs away from it.
Patrick
Did you hear that, Chicken Patrick? Did you hear that Duck & Run
Duke? J Young says you're hopeless without him! Well, I guess he's
right where you two are concerned....
So the Catholics are so useless that they need you to LIE about child
rape for them? Not in defense of anyhtign we posted to these four
newsgroups, but in a thread *you* began for no reaosn at all but to
puff yourself up with your childish "mission" to be Superman
whitewashing that appalling Catholic disgrace with LIES that aren't
even white because they "can't handle the truth"! lol!
I see you failed to address what I actually posted as usual, instead
chosing to whine and RUN like the stinking diarrhea you are. I
sincerely hope the Catholics think you're helping, because I see you
doing nothing but making the theist side look like unrepentant
dirtbags.
On second thought, by all means keep it up. lol!
-----------
Did you have a question or concern, bukaka?
william mosco
you're free to be selective on who you call out for lying... your
example demonstrates who the true coward is..., coward jimmy...
Virgil
"Zacharias Mulletstein" <zachmul...@isalwaysright.com> wrote:
>
> Quit lying. Everyone knows you're a fox Christian.
Takes one to know one!!!
--
james g. keegan jr.
<c794b3bf-d954-4886...@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
keep running away from your claim silly billy.
(�`�.� Craig Chilton �.���) <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com>
Mike Painter
So who is the other "J", the one who posts bigoted articles about all
minorities and seems to gloat over them?
J
"Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com> wrote in message
news:BsOdneXT0NX9P5LT...@posted.localnet...
The buffoon knows he cannot intelligently respond about matters of family
values, morality, and decency. Instead "Booty" tries to start some
infighting among the 3 people who post regularly that inject sanity towards
topics that normal people understand perfectly well, but the social pigheads
can't comprehend. Perfect example of this 'diversion attempt' can be found
right here in this thread. The post began questioning "Colanths" support of
NAMBLA and dipshit "Budikka" tries to change the topic to theism, the
Catholic Church, and my speaking up for those who are libeled. "Budikka"
must think everyone is like "Syd".
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
(�`�.� Craig Chilton �.���) <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com>
"Jon Young"/"Auric Hellman"" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
> The buffoon knows he cannot intelligently respond about
> matters of family values, morality, and decency.
There you go, talking about yourself again, "Auric." At least
this time you did so ACCURATELY.
But there was really no need for you to do that, since you've
PROVEN all those sociopathic traits you possess, to us, MANY times
before. Such as ---
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" -- INSANITY Personified as
He Praises the Atrocities Done by the NAZIS, posting
under the Alias, "Auric Hellman"
"I'm a devout Catholic and would like to see the Muslims start
stoking-up the ovens in Tel Aviv."
From: "Auric Hellman" <adhe...@volcanomail.com>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.israel
Subject: Re: I'd like to see the Muslims destroy...
Date: 17 Sep 2006 18:42:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1158543753.0...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.117.14
"Sunday, April 15th is Holocaust Memorial Day. What is the appropriate
greeting one gives this day? Does one say "Happy Holocaust" or send
cards that read "Wish you were there"? I'm trying my best to be
politically correct."
From: "Auric Hellman" <adhell...@volcanomail.com>
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.jewish,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.gossip.royalty
Subject: Holocaust Memorial Day
Date: 8 Apr 2007 19:52:17 -0700
Message-ID: <1176087137.1...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Budikka666
> The buffoon knows he cannot intelligently respond about matters of family
> values, morality, and decency.
This from a hate-filled scum bucket like you? lol!
I see that you once again RAN AWAY from my criticisms to hide behind
insults. What a sad little loser you are.
> Instead "Booty" tries to start some
> infighting among the 3 people who post regularly that inject sanity
Cowardly Liar Patrick? Duck & Run Duke? J Young who is a theist but
is far too cowardly to admit it? lol! We don't use 'sanity' in the
same sentence with those loonies.
> Perfect example of this 'diversion attempt' can be found
> right here in this thread. The post began questioning "Colanths" support of
> NAMBLA
Colanth didn't support NAMBLA you lying piece of shit. He supported
the very thing you hypocritically claim for yourself when you're
spamming alt.atheism with your religiously inspired diatribes: the
right to free speech.
What a loser moron you are! But look on the bright side: once you
quit telling LIES on Usenet, then I can stop calling you a worthless
piece of libellous, LYING, bigotted trash, can't I? Don't you want to
join hands with me and work towards that day Jackass Young?
> and dipshit "Budikka" tries to change the topic to theism, the
> Catholic Church
If you don't want this to be a religious issue you delusional dipshit,
then why are you persistently posting your rants to
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic? Or is this your cowardly way
of admitting that your're a Catholic?
> and my speaking up for those who are libeled
By libelling Colanth? By consistently spamming alt abortion with
irrelevant crap? Or are you an abortionist?
By posting this to alt.homosexuality when it has nothing whatsoever to
do with homosexuality? Or is this your cowardly way of admitting that
you're gay?
You really are lower than snakeshit. Go look up free speech and then
write us an essay explaining why you should be allowed it but not
anyone you disagree with, you braindead jackass.
Budikka
Patrick
Cowardly Liar Patrick? Duck & Run Duke? J Young who is a theist but
is far too cowardly to admit it? lol! We don't use 'sanity' in the
same sentence with those loonies.
+ Coward? Liar?
+ Do ya wanna fight, bitch?
william mosco
i stand by my claim... prove my claim wrong by stating colanth lied...
Budikka666
> "Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote
Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
Budikka
james g. keegan jr.
<7b46ae33-402a-4e1f...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
you already admitted it was false.
william mosco
no i didn't... i stand by my claim.
Mike Painter
You should note that teh last time Patrick wanted a fight he wanted his
grandson to do the fighting.
He was under 10 as I recall.
Brave Sir Patrick.
Patrick
+ Do you believe in Jesus?
+ If you don't, why do you bring him up?
+ I didn't hear you.
Patrick
"Mike Painter" <md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:pvmdnX4tQ75YbI3T...@giganews.com...
My grandson is 4.
He could whup yer ass.
james g. keegan jr.
<81e6e3a9-54f3-4e91...@t9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
Mike Painter
And I believe you would encourage it.
william mosco
i didn't do that. i stand by my claim. if you state that colanth
lied you will have proved my claim wrong.
Budikka666
> "Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message
>
> news:31cfcd23-1b48-4a59...@q5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 3, 12:16 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>
> > "Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote
>
> > Cowardly Liar Patrick? Duck & Run Duke? J Young who is a theist but
> > is far too cowardly to admit it? lol! We don't use 'sanity' in the
> > same sentence with those loonies.
>
> > + Coward? Liar?
> > + Do ya wanna fight, bitch?
>
> Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
> Budikka
>
> + Do you believe in Jesus?
I see that once again you RAN AWAY from my questions and hid behind
your own juvenile ones. What are you, thirteen?
Why would anyone of intelligence believe in ridiculous childish myths
about magic gods and super heroes? If you want me to believe, then
you need to to quit RUNNING AWAY and meet my challenge from which you
RAN AWAY just a few weeks ago: please provide *postive* *scientific*
evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a
god.
(Note that scientific evidence is that which is published in
recognized professional science journals. Positive evidence is that
which actively supports your position and does not consist solely of
feeble and thoroughly ineffectual attempts to tear down your
opponent's position)
OR
please provide *independent* *objective* evidence that there ever was
a Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a god.
(Note that objective evidence is that which comes from an independent
disinterested source and which positively promotes the hypothesis
which you're seeking to advance. it doesn't consist of quoting
ancient writers who testify not to the existence of any Jesus, but to
the existence of Christianity. Christianity is not in doubt. What's
in doubt is that there was a root of Christianity who was a miracle-
working son of a god. Got that straight this time?)
OR
please provide an *intelligent* rationale that there ever was a Jesus
Christ, miracle-working son of a god.
(Note that intelligent rationale does *not* mean plagiarising theist
web sites and posting unattributed reams of already refuted bullshit.
it mean makign yoru own argument in your own words - which can be
supported by appropriate references to the material of others - which
provides a solid, logical underpinning for your position.)
> + If you don't, why do you bring him up?
To highlight once again that you're promoting mythology and that you
have consistently failed to provide any scientific, objective or
rational support for your claims.
> + I didn't hear you.
That's why you're such a pathological loser. You don't listen and you
can't learn.
Budikka
james g. keegan jr.
<502df6f5-4152-4a8c...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 3, 9:20�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <81e6e3a9-54f3-4e91-9769-8a0d93ae5...@t9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 3, 6:43�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > no i didn't... �ｿｽi stand by my claim.
> >
> > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
>
> i didn't do that.
your post was cut at your first new lie.
Patrick
OR
OR
+ Teach me, boo-kaka....
Who are you and what do you believe?
Why are you here?
I am a Catholic, listening to liars, and then calling them on their lies.
Colanth
<zachmul...@isalwaysright.com> wrote:
>"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>news:dukr0751dogpcg1q4...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:15:58 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>>>news:sidh0758ebpedpi3s...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:40 -0400, "J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:MPG.2871278de...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3gs4pto
>>>>
>>>>>From the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in NYC. You call this "decency"?
>>>>.
>>>> http://tiny.cc/52xzt
>>
>>>> No, equal rights isn't decent - to turds like you.
>>
>>>> Hey, if you don't like it, stay in New Jersey. Maybe the mosquitoes
>>>> will want you. (The new crop is as big as 757s.)
>>
>>>You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>>endorse
>>>such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'.
>>
>> Being gay? No, it doesn't "deserve equal rights", any more than
>> having blue eyes does. It's just something that - unless you're
>> romantically involved with a gay person, is none of your business.
>>
>>> The church
>>>is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty parties
>>>to
>>>such perversion.
>>
>> After decades of making sure that they were moved out of the
>> jurisdiction the instant the Church found out. That's abetting a
>> felon at best.
>>
>>> What's your excuse?
>>
>> For what? Not sucking up to a Nazi turd child rapist apologist? It's
>> called morals - something you know nothing about.
>
>I KNEW you were Raytard. Quit denying it bitch.
Ray is, IIRC, in NY. I'm currently in NC. If I'm Ray, I'm big enough
to not notice when I step on your house with you in it.
--
"Yield to temptation, it may not pass your way again." - Lazarus Long
Colanth
>I am not a theist but I am an egalitarian. That means I believe ALL sides
>have a right to be heard and in this ng
Your beliefs have nothing to do with alt.atheism.
> only Catholic-bashers feel that they are entitled.
If an atheist feels like bashing the RCC, it's on-topic. If you feel
like defending the Church, it's off-topic..
> My mission is to provide a voice for those who suffer but
>are unpopular.
Your mission is to prove what a low-life moron you are - and you're SO
good at it.
Colanth
>On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:33:34 -0500, "(�`�.� Craig Chilton �.���)
><http://www.LayoffRemedy.com>" <c...@z.com> wrote:
>> No Irony Meter within 12,000 miles survived that!
>Part of the reason we oppose homosexalty is because we are
>egalitarians.
You're determined to destroy all the irony meters in the world?
> All true Christians are egalitarians
In the universe?
Colanth
<zachmul...@isalwaysright.com> wrote:
>"J" <jvis...@live.com> wrote in message
>news:4qira9....@news.alt.net...
>>
>> "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in message
>> news:400e1a36-3fc3-408d...@ct4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jun 30, 9:15 pm, "J" <jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>> > "Colanth" <cola...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
>>> >
>>> > You have a lot of audacity criticizing The Catholic Church when you
>>> > endorse
>>> > such behaviour as being 'decent' and deserving of 'equal rights'. The
>>> > church
>>> > is at least alerting law-enforcement authorities about any guilty
>>> > parties to
>>> > such perversion. What's your excuse?
>>
>>> This from the liar who is apparently forgetting that the Catholic
>>> church actively covered-up and thereby facilitated child rape and
>>> abuse for decades?
>>
>>> You really are the lowest scum in the scum bucket aren't you? Too
>>> chicken to admit you're a theist and yet you defend the church no
>>> matter how depraved and evil it is, don't you?
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not a theist but I am an egalitarian. That means I believe ALL sides
>> have a right to be heard and in this ng, only Catholic-bashers feel that
>> they are entitled. My mission is to provide a voice for those who suffer
>> but are unpopular.
>
>Quit lying. Everyone knows you're a fox Christian.
Everyone knows you are too, Zachy. True Christians don't huff bug
spray.
Zacharias Mulletstein
"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:gb64175mingshq46r...@4ax.com...
Do I hear bagpipes playing?
--
I am a Fundamentalist Christian Pentecostal Warrior for the One lamb virgin,
Jesus Christ.
william mosco
> william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 3, 9:20 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:> > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
>
> > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
>
> > i didn't do that.
>
> your post was cut at your first new lie.
if you state that colanth lied you will have proved my claim wrong.
you won't...
Mike Painter
I realize that this will require considerable intellectual effort on your
part Patrick, maybe your four year old grandchild can help you.
Why dont you learn to use a newsreader well enough to mark responses?
william mosco
> william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 3, 9:20 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:> > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
>
> > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
>
> > i didn't do that.
>
> your post was cut at your first new lie.
i won't bother asking, since i know you won't provide any proof that i
admitted my original claim was false... maybe if i call you a pile of
shit for a couple weeks you'll be forced to make an ass of yourself
again...
Patrick
> Patrick wrote:
What did I write?
Why did you snip it?
And, if you can't understand what I say, don't pretend.
Ask.
james g. keegan jr.
<c5fc8e47-63c4-43ac...@k27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 9:42�ｿｽam, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 3, 9:20�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <81e6e3a9-54f3-4e91-9769-8a0d93ae5...@t9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > ,
> > > > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.c
> > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > no i didn't... �ｿｽi stand by my claim.
> >
> > > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
> >
> > > i didn't do that.
> >
> > your post was cut at your first new lie.
>
> i won't bother asking
you hear that all the time, i know.
james g. keegan jr.
<983b38db-ea95-410a...@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 9:42�ｿｽam, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 3, 9:20�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <81e6e3a9-54f3-4e91-9769-8a0d93ae5...@t9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > ,
> > > > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.c
> > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > no i didn't... �ｿｽi stand by my claim.
> >
> > > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
> >
> > > i didn't do that.
> >
> > your post was cut at your first new lie.
>
> if you state that colanth lied
if you claim the monday follows sunday.....
keep running.
william mosco
> william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 9:42 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.c
>
> > > > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
>
> > > > i didn't do that.
>
> > > your post was cut at your first new lie.
>
> > if you state that colanth lied
>
> if you claim the monday follows sunday.....
>
> keep running.
i stand by my claim that you agreed with a blatant lie.
william mosco
> william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 9:42 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.c
>
> > > > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
>
> > > > i didn't do that.
>
> > > your post was cut at your first new lie.
>
> > i won't bother asking
>
> you hear that all the time, i know.
jimmy now begins to speak in the mirror... wow.
james g. keegan jr.
<ee403423-d1c4-44c9...@p6g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 7:37�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <983b38db-ea95-410a-b052-8a85080d3...@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
> > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 4, 9:42�ｿｽam, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jul 3, 9:20�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <81e6e3a9-54f3-4e91-9769-8a0d93ae5...@t9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.
> > > > > > > > com>
> > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegrou
> > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news:58lr079o9iq0dgs540vbv3vj2f626mrprt@4ax.
> > > > > > > no i didn't... �ｿｽi stand by my claim.
> >
> > > > > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
> >
> > > > > i didn't do that.
> >
> > > > your post was cut at your first new lie.
> >
> > > if you state that colanth lied
> >
> > if you claim the monday follows sunday.....
> >
> > keep running.
>
> i stand by my claim that you agreed with a blatant lie.
your post was cut after your first new lie.
james g. keegan jr.
<5897c15a-420d-4d66...@gc3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 7:36�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <c5fc8e47-63c4-43ac-89eb-d4c3f9195...@k27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 4, 9:42�ｿｽam, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jul 3, 9:20�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <81e6e3a9-54f3-4e91-9769-8a0d93ae5...@t9g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.
> > > > > > > > com>
> > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > �ｿｽwilliam mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35�ｿｽpm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegrou
> > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news:58lr079o9iq0dgs540vbv3vj2f626mrprt@4ax.
> > > > > > > no i didn't... �ｿｽi stand by my claim.
william mosco
> william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 7:37 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 4, 9:42 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <502df6f5-4152-4a8c-91f8-0722eab79...@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > > > > On Jul 3, 9:20 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 6:43 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > <7b46ae33-402a-4e1f-91b5-09e54d47b...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.
> > > > > > > > > com>> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 9:35 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > <c794b3bf-d954-4886-9be5-c04b58db2...@d14g2000yqb.googlegrou
>
> > > > > > > so you lied thenwhen you admitted it was false?
>
> > > > > > i didn't do that.
>
> > > > > your post was cut at your first new lie.
>
> > > > if you state that colanth lied
>
> > > if you claim the monday follows sunday.....
>
> > > keep running.
>
> > i stand by my claim that you agreed with a blatant lie.
>
> your post was cut after your first new lie.
jimmy has dropped into insanity.
james g. keegan jr.
<422c213d-cbda-43a4...@hi9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 9:24�pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Sorry, no. The Church claims
Budikka666
I see you RAN exactly as I predicted. That's you running, Chicken
Duck & Run Duke running, Chicken Andrew-a-Blank running, LiarBoi
Loirbaj running, and All Flee & Hide running all at the same time.
That's not a record but it's close.
Budikka
Patrick
> > Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
> > Budikka
>
> > + Do you believe in Jesus?
>
> I see that once again you RAN AWAY from my questions and hid behind
> your own juvenile ones. What are you, thirteen?
I need to know who you are and what you believe before I can
start to explain things to you. If you are a theist, we can start from
there.
If you are an atheist, we can start from there. If you are a rock, we
will have a most difficult time finding a starting place.
If you are AFRAID of discussion, just say so.
Why don't you use a real name? Are you afraid someone might
actually find out who you are or what you are pretending?
> Why would anyone of intelligence believe in ridiculous childish myths
> about magic gods and super heroes? If you want me to believe, then
> you need to to quit RUNNING AWAY and meet my challenge from which you
> RAN AWAY just a few weeks ago: please provide *postive* *scientific*
> evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a
> god.
I have posted several different arguments that you should
have been able to discuss. Instead, you snip them and whine
that the proof didn't meet your specific needs.
> (Note that scientific evidence is that which is published in
> recognized professional science journals. Positive evidence is that
> which actively supports your position and does not consist solely of
> feeble and thoroughly ineffectual attempts to tear down your
> opponent's position)
I have posted several intellectual posts about the existence of God.
At which you merely fall on the floor, kick your feet, and whine
that you don't like my answer. Guess what! Tough shit.
> OR
>> please provide *independent* *objective* evidence that there ever was
> a Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a god.
Any evidence I provide will be denied.
Just as you cannot provide independent objective evidence that
George Washington ever lived, I cannot prove Jesus ever lived
without using documentation of the period. Which you refuse to accept.
> (Note that objective evidence is that which comes from an independent
> disinterested source and which positively promotes the hypothesis
> which you're seeking to advance. it doesn't consist of quoting
> ancient writers who testify not to the existence of any Jesus, but to
> the existence of Christianity. Christianity is not in doubt. What's
> in doubt is that there was a root of Christianity who was a miracle-
> working son of a god. Got that straight this time?)
Can you prove Aristitle ever existed?
Or Helen of Troy?
How about Charlemagne?
And, you are not allowed to use documentation of the day.
> OR
> please provide an *intelligent* rationale that there ever was a Jesus
> Christ, miracle-working son of a god.
> (Note that intelligent rationale does *not* mean plagiarising theist
> web sites and posting unattributed reams of already refuted bullshit.
> it mean makign yoru own argument in your own words - which can be
> supported by appropriate references to the material of others - which
> provides a solid, logical underpinning for your position.)
Gosh,.... now you want me to use my own words, yet
you know I did not live 2000 years ago. Your little demands
are silly and juvenile.
I think I'll just go back and repeat all your demands:
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
> + Teach me, boo-kaka....
> Who are you and what do you believe?
> Why are you here?
> I am a Catholic, listening to liars, and then calling them on their lies.
I see you RAN exactly as I predicted. That's you running, Chicken
Duck & Run Duke running, Chicken Andrew-a-Blank running, LiarBoi
Loirbaj running, and All Flee & Hide running all at the same time.
+ I see. You demand and you want others to jump?
+ Is that what you demand?
Here, let me repeat all your demands one more time:
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
Mike Painter
> "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote
>
>>> Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
>>> Budikka
>>
>>> + Do you believe in Jesus?
>>
>> I see that once again you RAN AWAY from my questions and hid behind
>> your own juvenile ones. What are you, thirteen?
>
> I need to know who you are and what you believe before I can
> start to explain things to you. If you are a theist, we can start
> from there.
> If you are an atheist, we can start from there. If you are a rock, we
> will have a most difficult time finding a starting place.
> If you are AFRAID of discussion, just say so.
> Why don't you use a real name? Are you afraid someone might
> actually find out who you are or what you are pretending?
That would imply a non constant belief system.
The RCC uses the same methods to teach children who are born atheist as they
do adults who are theists.
If your beliefs are true and consistent than you would not need to know what
a person believes.
I don't recall anybody in any hard science class starting by asking what
people believed.
>
>
>> Why would anyone of intelligence believe in ridiculous childish myths
>> about magic gods and super heroes? If you want me to believe, then
>> you need to to quit RUNNING AWAY and meet my challenge from which you
>> RAN AWAY just a few weeks ago: please provide *postive* *scientific*
>> evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a
>> god.
>
> I have posted several different arguments that you should
> have been able to discuss. Instead, you snip them and whine
> that the proof didn't meet your specific needs.
Where did he snip them and what were these arguments.
I've never seen you post anything of value that was not plagerized,
frequently from sites that do not consider you a christian.
>
>
>> (Note that scientific evidence is that which is published in
>> recognized professional science journals. Positive evidence is that
>> which actively supports your position and does not consist solely of
>> feeble and thoroughly ineffectual attempts to tear down your
>> opponent's position)
>
> I have posted several intellectual posts about the existence of God.
> At which you merely fall on the floor, kick your feet, and whine
> that you don't like my answer. Guess what! Tough shit.
>
Plagerized and you have never attempted to defend them.
>
>
>> OR
>>> please provide *independent* *objective* evidence that there ever
>>> was
>> a Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a god.
>
> Any evidence I provide will be denied.
> Just as you cannot provide independent objective evidence that
> George Washington ever lived, I cannot prove Jesus ever lived
> without using documentation of the period. Which you refuse to
> accept.
We don't deny evidence, you post metaphysical arguments and vague
references.
As for what evidence is, that has plainly been stated, CONTEMPORARY
DOCUMENTS supporting the existence of such a person.
They exist for Washington. The exist for Roman foot soldiers at the time of
Christ, they do not exist for Christ.
Patrick
> Patrick wrote:
>> "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote
>>
>>>> Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
>>>> Budikka
>>>
>>>> + Do you believe in Jesus?
>>>
>>> I see that once again you RAN AWAY from my questions and hid behind
>>> your own juvenile ones. What are you, thirteen?
>>
>> I need to know who you are and what you believe before I can
>> start to explain things to you. If you are a theist, we can start
>> from there.
>> If you are an atheist, we can start from there. If you are a rock, we
>> will have a most difficult time finding a starting place.
>> If you are AFRAID of discussion, just say so.
>> Why don't you use a real name? Are you afraid someone might
>> actually find out who you are or what you are pretending?
>
> That would imply a non constant belief system.
> The RCC uses the same methods to teach children who are born atheist as
> they do adults who are theists.
Wahhh... So do Nazi's.... Why don't you call me a Nazi?
> If your beliefs are true and consistent than you would not need to know
> what a person believes.
My beliefs are constant and true.
I just have no idea what yours are.
You may be an agnostic. You may be a wiccan. I can't begin
to discuss God with you unless you know what God is.
If you think it is pixie dust, then go sniff some, I don't giva shit.
> I don't recall anybody in any hard science class starting by asking what
> people believed.
Bull Shit.
If one person speaks Greek, and one speaks Latin, it
is impossible to start a conversation until they can find
common ground.
>> I have posted several different arguments that you should
>> have been able to discuss. Instead, you snip them and whine
>> that the proof didn't meet your specific needs.
>
> Where did he snip them and what were these arguments.
> I've never seen you post anything of value that was not plagerized,
> frequently from sites that do not consider you a christian.
I'm not here to please your palate.
If you don't wish me to give you proof, stop asking.
>>> (Note that scientific evidence is that which is published in
>>> recognized professional science journals. Positive evidence is that
>>> which actively supports your position and does not consist solely of
>>> feeble and thoroughly ineffectual attempts to tear down your
>>> opponent's position)
>>
>> I have posted several intellectual posts about the existence of God.
>> At which you merely fall on the floor, kick your feet, and whine
>> that you don't like my answer. Guess what! Tough shit.
>>
> Plagerized and you have never attempted to defend them.
I don't care to defend something when you merely snip them.
You are wasting my time.....
> We don't deny evidence, you post metaphysical arguments and vague
> references.
> As for what evidence is, that has plainly been stated, CONTEMPORARY
> DOCUMENTS supporting the existence of such a person.
> They exist for Washington. The exist for Roman foot soldiers at the time
> of Christ, they do not exist for Christ.
Prove it.
Post some proof for Washington and a foot soldier.
If your proof meets my approval, then I will provide some for you.
You first.
Budikka666
> "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote...
> > Patrick wrote:
> >> "Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote
>
> >>>> Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
> >>>> Budikka
>
> >>>> + Do you believe in Jesus?
>
> >>> I see that once again you RAN AWAY from my questions and hid behind
> >>> your own juvenile ones. What are you, thirteen?
>
> >> I need to know who you are and what you believe before I can
> >> start to explain things to you. If you are a theist, we can start
> >> from there.
> >> If you are an atheist, we can start from there. If you are a rock, we
> >> will have a most difficult time finding a starting place.
> >> If you are AFRAID of discussion, just say so.
> >> Why don't you use a real name? Are you afraid someone might
> >> actually find out who you are or what you are pretending?
>
> > That would imply a non constant belief system.
> > The RCC uses the same methods to teach children who are born atheist as
> > they do adults who are theists.
>
> Wahhh... So do Nazi's.... Why don't you call me a Nazi?
>
> > If your beliefs are true and consistent than you would not need to know
> > what a person believes.
>
> My beliefs are constant and true.
He said *consistent* you reading-for-comprehension-challenged
jackass. And we're still waiting on you providing positive scientific
evidence or independent objective evidence, or even an intelligent
rationale that you didn't plagiarise and that hasn't long-ago been
refuted to demonstrate the truth of them
Keep running you pathetic coward.
Budikka
Patrick
+What is this? Is your name Mikey? Is his name bukaka?
Mike Painter
> "Mike Painter" <md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote...
>> Patrick wrote:
>>> "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote
>>>
>>>>> Is that what Jesus would say you hypocritical asshole?
>>>>> Budikka
>>>>
>>>>> + Do you believe in Jesus?
>>>>
>>>> I see that once again you RAN AWAY from my questions and hid behind
>>>> your own juvenile ones. What are you, thirteen?
>>>
>>> I need to know who you are and what you believe before I can
>>> start to explain things to you. If you are a theist, we can start
>>> from there.
>>> If you are an atheist, we can start from there. If you are a rock,
>>> we will have a most difficult time finding a starting place.
>>> If you are AFRAID of discussion, just say so.
>>> Why don't you use a real name? Are you afraid someone might
>>> actually find out who you are or what you are pretending?
>>
>> That would imply a non constant belief system.
>> The RCC uses the same methods to teach children who are born atheist
>> as they do adults who are theists.
>
> Wahhh... So do Nazi's.... Why don't you call me a Nazi?
And why don't you plagiarize something to at least make an attempt to show
you understand the discussion.
>
>
>
>> If your beliefs are true and consistent than you would not need to
>> know what a person believes.
>
> My beliefs are constant and true.
> I just have no idea what yours are.
> You may be an agnostic. You may be a wiccan. I can't begin
> to discuss God with you unless you know what God is.
> If you think it is pixie dust, then go sniff some, I don't giva shit.
So you can't remember where you are or who you are talking with, is that it?
And your "constant" beliefs are also not part of the discussion.
>
>
>> I don't recall anybody in any hard science class starting by asking
>> what people believed.
>
> Bull Shit.
> If one person speaks Greek, and one speaks Latin, it
> is impossible to start a conversation until they can find
> common ground.
How clever. It seems to me that English is the language being spoken here.
ANYTHING but address the issue.
>
>
>
>>> I have posted several different arguments that you should
>>> have been able to discuss. Instead, you snip them and whine
>>> that the proof didn't meet your specific needs.
>>
>> Where did he snip them and what were these arguments.
>> I've never seen you post anything of value that was not plagerized,
>> frequently from sites that do not consider you a christian.
>
> I'm not here to please your palate.
> If you don't wish me to give you proof, stop asking.
>
Ther goes your consistancy.
First you aren't going to tell us and now you will.
Or at least you say you will, but don't
<snip>
>
> Prove it.
> Post some proof for Washington and a foot soldier.
> If your proof meets my approval, then I will provide some for you.
> You first.
My proofs will never meet your approval.
Why lie about it?
Ancient Times: A History of the Early World by James Henry Breasted is one
such source.
How about "Washington's visits to Rhode Island,: Gathered from contemporary
accounts."
I know that learning is against your belief system but a casual search of
the Internet will find what you want and show the difference between what
you may have to offer and what historians accept.
Patrick
>>> The RCC uses the same methods to teach children who are born atheist
>>> as they do adults who are theists.
>>
>> Wahhh... So do Nazi's.... Why don't you call me a Nazi?
>
> And why don't you plagiarize something to at least make an attempt to show
> you understand the discussion.
As soon as you come up with a new whine.
>>> If your beliefs are true and consistent than you would not need to
>>> know what a person believes.
>>
>> My beliefs are constant and true.
>> I just have no idea what yours are.
>> You may be an agnostic. You may be a wiccan. I can't begin
>> to discuss God with you unless you know what God is.
>> If you think it is pixie dust, then go sniff some, I don't giva shit.
>
> So you can't remember where you are or who you are talking with, is that
> it?
Huh?
Do you really feel your whine is different from any other catholic basher
here?
If you feel you must interrupt, you should identify yourself.
> And your "constant" beliefs are also not part of the discussion.
Then why did you jump in?
>>> I don't recall anybody in any hard science class starting by asking
>>> what people believed.
>>
>> Bull Shit.
>> If one person speaks Greek, and one speaks Latin, it
>> is impossible to start a conversation until they can find
>> common ground.
>
> How clever. It seems to me that English is the language being spoken here.
> ANYTHING but address the issue.
Well then, what is the issue?
Once you have identified it, then take a stance.
That way I can give you the facts and prove you are as ass hole.
>>>> I have posted several different arguments that you should
>>>> have been able to discuss. Instead, you snip them and whine
>>>> that the proof didn't meet your specific needs.
>>>
>>> Where did he snip them and what were these arguments.
>>> I've never seen you post anything of value that was not plagerized,
>>> frequently from sites that do not consider you a christian.
>>
>> I'm not here to please your palate.
>> If you don't wish me to give you proof, stop asking.
>>
> Ther goes your consistancy.
> First you aren't going to tell us and now you will.
> Or at least you say you will, but don't
Make up your mind.
Do you want verified truth? or not?
If the proof comes from a verified source, you whine that the
words are plagarized. You don't even address the facts. You merely
whine that the words are not mine. But I use my own words, they
aren't verified. <yawn>
Once you've made up your mind, make up mine.
> <snip>
>>
>> Prove it.
>> Post some proof for Washington and a foot soldier.
>> If your proof meets my approval, then I will provide some for you.
>> You first.
>
> My proofs will never meet your approval.
> Why lie about it?
Exactly.
Just as you don't have verified proof for a foot soldier or George
Washington, I do not have proof of jesus that will satisfy you.
So......... stop asking.....
> Ancient Times: A History of the Early World by James Henry Breasted is one
> such source.
> How about "Washington's visits to Rhode Island,: Gathered from
> contemporary accounts."
What about those?
Who peer reviewed them?
They are just stories and myths.
> I know that learning is against your belief system but a casual search of
> the Internet will find what you want and show the difference between what
> you may have to offer and what historians accept.
Maybe your historians accept them.
Using your logic, I can find others who do not believe.
Your whine is old.... Stop plagiarizing it.
Mike Painter
> "Mike Painter" <md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> That would imply a non constant belief system.
>>>> The RCC uses the same methods to teach children who are born
>>>> atheist as they do adults who are theists.
>>>
>>> Wahhh... So do Nazi's.... Why don't you call me a Nazi?
>>
>> And why don't you plagiarize something to at least make an attempt
>> to show you understand the discussion.
>
> As soon as you come up with a new whine.
Your plagerism and your refusal to acknowledge it shows just how strong your
Catholic Faith is.
Your lack of remorse along with wha the RCC teaches says that even if you
were honest enough to confess it, your sins would not be forgiven you.
>
>
>>>> If your beliefs are true and consistent than you would not need to
>>>> know what a person believes.
>>>
>>> My beliefs are constant and true.
>>> I just have no idea what yours are.
>>> You may be an agnostic. You may be a wiccan. I can't begin
>>> to discuss God with you unless you know what God is.
>>> If you think it is pixie dust, then go sniff some, I don't giva
>>> shit.
>>
>> So you can't remember where you are or who you are talking with, is
>> that it?
>
> Huh?
> Do you really feel your whine is different from any other catholic
> basher here?
> If you feel you must interrupt, you should identify yourself.
Are you claiming you don't know who you are talking to?
>
>
>> And your "constant" beliefs are also not part of the discussion.
>
> Then why did you jump in?
I didn't jump in. You were responding to my post when you said constant and
that was pointed out to you.
>
>
>>>> I don't recall anybody in any hard science class starting by asking
>>>> what people believed.
>>>
>>> Bull Shit.
>>> If one person speaks Greek, and one speaks Latin, it
>>> is impossible to start a conversation until they can find
>>> common ground.
>>
>> How clever. It seems to me that English is the language being spoken
>> here. ANYTHING but address the issue.
>
> Well then, what is the issue?
> Once you have identified it, then take a stance.
> That way I can give you the facts and prove you are as ass hole.
I did, you responded to it by refusing to answer.
At least one other person commented on it.
You might get away with the Reagan defense among your friens but not when
you are dealing with people that think.
>
>
>>>>> I have posted several different arguments that you should
>>>>> have been able to discuss. Instead, you snip them and whine
>>>>> that the proof didn't meet your specific needs.
>>>>
>>>> Where did he snip them and what were these arguments.
>>>> I've never seen you post anything of value that was not plagerized,
>>>> frequently from sites that do not consider you a christian.
>>>
>>> I'm not here to please your palate.
>>> If you don't wish me to give you proof, stop asking.
>>>
>> Ther goes your consistancy.
>> First you aren't going to tell us and now you will.
>> Or at least you say you will, but don't
>
> Make up your mind.
> Do you want verified truth? or not?
> If the proof comes from a verified source, you whine that the
> words are plagarized. You don't even address the facts. You merely
> whine that the words are not mine. But I use my own words, they
> aren't verified. <yawn>
> Once you've made up your mind, make up mine.
You have never offered proof and your plagerized sources do not offer proof
or evidence.
>
>
>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>> Post some proof for Washington and a foot soldier.
>>> If your proof meets my approval, then I will provide some for you.
>>> You first.
>>
>> My proofs will never meet your approval.
>> Why lie about it?
>
> Exactly.
> Just as you don't have verified proof for a foot soldier or George
> Washington, I do not have proof of jesus that will satisfy you.
> So......... stop asking.....
>
>
>
>> Ancient Times: A History of the Early World by James Henry Breasted
>> is one such source.
>> How about "Washington's visits to Rhode Island,: Gathered from
>> contemporary accounts."
>
> What about those?
> Who peer reviewed them?
> They are just stories and myths.
>
An expected response.
>
>> I know that learning is against your belief system but a casual
>> search of the Internet will find what you want and show the
>> difference between what you may have to offer and what historians
>> accept.
>
> Maybe your historians accept them.
> Using your logic, I can find others who do not believe.
> Your whine is old.... Stop plagiarizing it.
No wonder you defend Earl you have many similar qualities.