Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.history, alt.religion.islam, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy
From: duke <duckgumb...@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:51:04 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 7:51 am
Subject: Re: Do not trust in princes, In mortal man, in whom there is no salvation, Ps. 146:3... mortals such as Mary; bones; relics; statues...
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:00:52 -0800, r...@somis.org (R.Measures) wrote:Mary, as scripture strongly suggests.
>In article <aku1a8lmjdoig6nt93qlmved57rvi8e...@4ax.com>, duke
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:27:24 -0800, r...@somis.org (R.Measures) wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:15:33 -0800, r...@somis.org (R.Measures) wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:55:10 -0800 (PST), kolwe...@astromail.com wrote:
>> >> >> >On Nov 5, 8:11 am, <www.salvation belongs to the Lord> wrote:
>> >> >> >If you have NO respect for our lady, the one who bears
>> >> >> This is illogical. Mary had a mother, she had a mother etc back to
>> >> > The key to this delusion is that Mary's mom supposedly conceived Mary
>> >> Haahaahaa. He's still clueless after I've corrected him so many
>> > So tell us again whose conception was "Immaculate".
>> Jesus, if you claim no semen.
The dukester, American - American
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.