On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:00:52 -0800, r...@somis.org (•R.Measures) wrote:
>In article <aku1a8lmjdoig6nt93qlmved57rvi8e...@4ax.com>, duke
><duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:27:24 -0800, r...@somis.org (•R.Measures) wrote:

>> >In article <kodv989641darkneltojm72hees10ej...@4ax.com>, duke
>> ><duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>> >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:15:33 -0800, r...@somis.org (•R.Measures) wrote:

>> >> >In article <vp2t98ll8p04lvtmttosbk8m6aqr08l...@4ax.com>,
>> >Za...@utopia.net wrote:

>> >> >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:55:10 -0800 (PST), kolwe...@astromail.com wrote:

>> >> >> >On Nov 5, 8:11 am,   <www.salvation belongs to the Lord> wrote:
>> >> >> >> the evidence of salvation and the blessedness thereof, as Ps.146
>> >> >indicates, lies in exactly who has
>> >> >> >> given us life eternal... it certainly wasn't mortal Mary nor the
>> >> >thousands and thousands of dead
>> >> >> >> people her worshipers kneel down to as well and their bones, relics
>> >> >and statues and pictures they
>> >> >> >> ask favor's of...

>> >> >> >If you have NO respect for our lady, the one who bears
>> >> >> >Jesus, the light of the world in her womb, then
>> >> >> >you are a demon.
>> >> >> >David says, trust no man and If you think
>> >> >> >he was talking about the Messiah and his blessed mother
>> >> >> >since David is also a man why should we care or trust
>> >> >> >what he said

>> >> >> This is illogical. Mary had a mother, she had a mother etc back to
>> >> >> Eve. What you say makes no sense.

>> >> >•  The key to this delusion is that Mary's mom supposedly conceived Mary
>> >> >without semen/original sin. (1845)

>> >> Haahaahaa.  He's still clueless after I've corrected him so many
>times before.

>> >•  So tell us again whose conception was "Immaculate".

>> Jesus, if you claim no semen.
>•  whose conception was "Immaculate" duke?