CORRUPTION! Obama Uses IRS To Attack Conservatives

Tracey12

unread,

May 10, 2013, 4:36:38 PM5/10/13

to

WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!

Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.

From Drudge:

White House blames -- BUSH!
FLASHBACK: Obama jokes about auditing enemies...
McConnell demands investigation...
House vows probe...
IRS SPOKESMAN: 'I'm not good at math'...

IRS ADMITS TARGETING CONSERVATIVE GROUPS; APOLOGIZES

Tracey12

unread,

May 10, 2013, 5:01:28 PM5/10/13

to

On May 10, 3:58 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 3:43 pm, w...@panix.com (the wharf rat) wrote:

> > So Obama had nothing to do with it,

The Time President Obama Made An Auditing Joke

President Obama was giving the commencement address at Arizona State
University in 2009 where he joked about auditing the president of
ASU
and their board of regents . The IRS apologized today for unfairly
targetingTea Party groups with extra scrutiny about their tax
status.
posted on May 10, 2013 at 1:55pm EDT

From: http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/the-time-president-obama-made...

You'd have to be an Obama Lover to say that he does not have the
power
> to influence the IRS.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 10, 2013, 5:44:34 PM5/10/13

to

In article
<a3fa6b4f-f2a7-4437...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,

Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!
>
> Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
> IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
> affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.
>
>
> From Drudge:
>

� Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.

Tracey12

unread,

May 10, 2013, 5:49:58 PM5/10/13

to

As part of this process, agents in Cincinnati came up with a list of
things to look for in an application. As part of the list, they
included the words, "tea party" and "patriot," Lerner said.

FROM:

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/irs-apologizes-targeting-conservative-groups

Harold Burton

unread,

May 10, 2013, 8:50:14 PM5/10/13

to

In article <r-1005131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
wrote:

> In article
> <a3fa6b4f-f2a7-4437...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
> Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!
> >
> > Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
> > IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
> > affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.
> >
> >
> > From Drudge:
> >
> • Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.

Leftards can't deny facts. Those facts - the Obama controlled IRS
targeted conservative organizations.

snicker

Tracey12

unread,

May 10, 2013, 9:27:23 PM5/10/13

to

On May 10, 4:44 pm, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:

> > From Drudge:
>
> Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.

Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt Drudge
writes all those articles he links to?

Kicking Ass and Taking Names

unread,

May 10, 2013, 10:15:37 PM5/10/13

to

On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:36:38 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:

>WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!
>
>Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
>IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
>affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.
>

Tell that to Richard Nixon.

opel

unread,

May 10, 2013, 10:22:13 PM5/10/13

to

He's dead, now deal with the dead-head mis-managing our nation today,
you scumbag.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 10, 2013, 11:08:40 PM5/10/13

to

In article <hal.i.burton-3D6E...@news.newsguy.com>, Harold

� How do we know that Michelle isn't at the top of the control pyramid?

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 10, 2013, 11:10:35 PM5/10/13

to

In article
<c5a1ec79-6a71-48fd...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 10, 4:44=A0pm, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> > > From Drudge:
> >

> > =A0Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.

>
> Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt Drudge
> writes all those articles he links to?

� I am a Republican. I voted for Tricky Dick Nixon.

Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E

unread,

May 10, 2013, 11:24:58 PM5/10/13

to

On May 10, 9:15 pm, Kicking Ass and Taking Names

<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:36:38 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>

> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!
>
> >Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
> >IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
> >affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.
>
> Tell that to Richard Nixon.

You tell him when you get to hell you fucking idiot.

Paul Duca

unread,

May 10, 2013, 11:46:08 PM5/10/13

to

On Friday, May 10, 2013 8:50:14 PM UTC-4, Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <r-1005131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article
>
> > <a3fa6b4f-f2a7-4437...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!
>
> > >
>
> > > Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
>
> > > IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
>
> > > affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > From Drudge:
>
> > >
>
> > • Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.
>
>
>

> Most neo-cons like me don't EARN enough to pay taxes, no matter what the 1%
>
> and their media buddies tell us otherwise.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

opel

unread,

May 11, 2013, 12:29:17 AM5/11/13

to

You're a dinosaur if that's the most recent political act you can chronicle.

opel

unread,

May 11, 2013, 12:31:20 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/2013 9:24 PM, Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
wrote:

Oh and he surely will, count on that...

Message has been deleted

opel

unread,

May 11, 2013, 12:56:33 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/2013 10:51 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> You're a fucking wingnut

You threatened to blow up Mt. Rushmore, you weapons grade whackjob.

Message has been deleted

opel

unread,

May 11, 2013, 12:57:16 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/2013 10:52 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> I got smart after Eisenhower.

Crayons and milk?

Good for you.

opel

unread,

May 11, 2013, 12:57:51 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/2013 10:55 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> Any "dinosaur" that

Shut your diseased old SoDak mouth, you fucking worthless worm.

Mike Smith

unread,

May 11, 2013, 5:53:13 AM5/11/13

to

Simple. Neither of them are intelligent enough to be top dog.

Mike Smith

•RLMeasures

unread,

May 11, 2013, 6:31:52 AM5/11/13

to

*** Who said it was the most recent?

Harold Burton

unread,

May 11, 2013, 6:32:58 AM5/11/13

to

In article <6gjro8p01uda3tmf5...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:27:23 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> �Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.

> >
> >Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt Drudge
> >writes all those articles he links to?
>

> ANYTHING SLudge "links to" is suspect.
>
> Sludge has absolutely NO credibility---AT ALL.
>
> BTW, neither do you
>
> You're a fucking wingnut conspiraloon----and don't take my word for
> it---just read the CRAZY crap you write.
>
> Fucking conspiracist moron.

If you can't refute the message attack the messenger.

snicker

•RLMeasures

unread,

May 11, 2013, 6:37:00 AM5/11/13

to

In article <1jjro8hgkole5i5fc...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Fri, 10 May 2013 20:10:35 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt Drudge
> >> writes all those articles he links to?
> >
> >• I am a Republican. I voted for Tricky Dick Nixon.
>

> Repent and you too can be saved ! !

>
> I got smart after Eisenhower.

• Ike was not as screwy.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 11, 2013, 6:39:45 AM5/11/13

to

In article <875so8ps1nupbd6k5...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

� Apparently a majority of voters thought they were Mike S.

Tracey12

unread,

May 11, 2013, 7:51:58 AM5/11/13

to

On May 10, 11:57 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> Not so much liberal/progressives. They tend to actually "live" their
> principles, instead of "messaging" them and being hypocrites.

Would that include Mr. "Let Me Show You My" Weiner? How about "Sweet
Thang" Barney Frank and his whore house from a few years ago? What
about good ol Billy "Zipper" Clinton and his wonderful bride Hilda
Hillary, the Impeached Couple? Lots of principles there, huh?

Yes, Sheriff Obama got caught using the IRS to oppress, and now he and
BroomHilda Hillary are going to suffer political damage and hopefully
both will be lame as heck ducks for the next ten years.

Benghazi and the mean ol IRS, HAHA! What's next? A divorce in the
White House?

Mike Smith

unread,

May 11, 2013, 8:40:17 AM5/11/13

to

That is not true, if you count registered voters. About 80 million
registered voters did not vote for either obama or Romney.

Besides.. what evidence is there that makes you think the 65 million
voters that did vote for obama were voting for him because they
thought he was intelligent?

Mike Smith

Tracey12

unread,

May 11, 2013, 9:42:38 AM5/11/13

to

On May 11, 7:40 am, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 03:39:45 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:

> >In article <875so8ps1nupbd6k5oihjeksl3903di...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

> ><m...@wt.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, 10 May 2013 20:08:40 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>

> >> >In article <hal.i.burton-3D6EBC.20501410052...@news.newsguy.com>, Harold
> >> >Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> In article <r-1005131444340...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> > In article
> >> >> > <a3fa6b4f-f2a7-4437-8f8e-fa97ea087...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,

> >> >> > Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> > > WOW! Obama is attacking his opposition with the IRS!
>
> >> >> > > Obama is turning America into a 3rd world banana republic..
> >> >> > > IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE IRS to target anyone because of political
> >> >> > > affiliation. That is pure harassment and fully unconstitutional.
>
> >> >> > > From Drudge:
>
> >> >> > • Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.
>
> >> >> Leftards can't deny facts. Those facts - the Obama controlled IRS
> >> >> targeted conservative organizations.
>
> >> >> snicker
>
> >> >• How do we know that Michelle isn't at the top of the control pyramid?
>
> >> Simple. Neither of them are intelligent enough to be top dog.
>
> >• Apparently a majority of voters thought they were Mike S.
>
> That is not true, if you count registered voters. About 80 million
> registered voters did not vote for either obama or Romney.
>
> Besides.. what evidence is there that makes you think the 65 million
> voters that did vote for obama were voting for him because they
> thought he was intelligent?
>
> Mike Smith

They didn't vote for Obama because they thought he would be a smart
pres. They voted from him so dayz could gets da Obama Phone.

George Kerby

unread,

May 11, 2013, 10:37:17 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/13 10:10 PM, in article r-1005132...@10.0.1.3, "�RLMeasures"

And you are full of shit as well...

George Kerby

unread,

May 11, 2013, 10:39:24 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/13 11:29 PM, in article kmkh4r$5t1$6...@dont-email.me, "opel"

He's a Californian - to them, that is Republican in their weird way of
thinking. Fruits, flakes and nuts all...

George Kerby

unread,

May 11, 2013, 10:42:36 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/10/13 11:57 PM, in article kmkipa$aue$6...@dont-email.me, "opel"

Yogurt considers 'smart' being able to make change. Change like Dumbo-ears
claims...

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 11, 2013, 10:54:45 AM5/11/13

to

In article <eseso85jha0mnpjqg...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

� okay - so count people who voted.

>
> Besides.. what evidence is there that makes you think the 65 million
> voters that did vote for obama were voting for him because they
> thought he was intelligent?

� Presumably he was intelligent enough not to hide Not paying Income Tax
and he is not stupid enough to believe in the LdS' Celestial
Impregnatorium filled with harems of receptive women with perfect bodies
who can never get enough sausage.
>
cheers Mike Smith

opel

unread,

May 11, 2013, 11:31:18 AM5/11/13

to

On 5/11/2013 4:31 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> In article <kmkh4r$5t1$6...@dont-email.me>, opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote:
>

>> On 5/10/2013 9:10 PM, â€¢RLMeasures wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <c5a1ec79-6a71-48fd...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 10, 4:44=A0pm, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> From Drudge:
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.
>>>>
>>>> Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt Drudge
>>>> writes all those articles he links to?
>>>

>>> â€¢ I am a Republican. I voted for Tricky Dick Nixon.

>>>
>>
>> You're a dinosaur if that's the most recent political act you can chronicle.
>
> *** Who said it was the most recent?
>

It was your chosen comment on the matter, and as such, revealing...

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 11, 2013, 1:29:09 PM5/11/13

to

In article <CDB3C1CD.9B6E4%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby

� Everybody is. I also voted for Barry Goldwater despite the snake
handling thing.

> A lot of public statements by leading wingers have used the phrase:
> "we need to 'craft a new message'---and it hasn't seemed to register
> on those supporters that in the behavior, the policy, and the goals
> which are outside credibility---that selling the same shit with a
> different coat of paint is stupid.
>
> There is a chasm between a conservative "principle" and the behavior,
> policy and goals which they eventually do. The greed and hypocrisy is
> painted over with a rhetorical coating---.
>
� alas.

Mike Smith

unread,

May 12, 2013, 6:29:38 AM5/12/13

to

I understand. The KKK was and is an exclusive democrat organization.

Mike Smith

Message has been deleted

George Kerby

unread,

May 12, 2013, 10:32:46 AM5/12/13

to

On 5/11/13 4:18 PM, in article r-1105131...@10.0.1.3, "�RLMeasures"

Like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz who never question, right?

Typical LibTard response coming folks. Watch-this should be GOOD!

duke

unread,

May 12, 2013, 11:00:33 AM5/12/13

to

On Fri, 10 May 2013 22:55:06 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Fri, 10 May 2013 22:29:17 -0600, opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote:

>
>>On 5/10/2013 9:10 PM, �RLMeasures wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <c5a1ec79-6a71-48fd...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 10, 4:44=A0pm, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> From Drudge:
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.
>>>>
>>>> Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt Drudge
>>>> writes all those articles he links to?
>>>
>>> � I am a Republican. I voted for Tricky Dick Nixon.
>>>
>>

>>You're a dinosaur if that's the most recent political act you can chronicle.
>

>Any "dinosaur" that can "see" the utter failings of a political
>ideology and behavior and alter their choices, is a candidate for
>saving.

Not buckwheat. Who is singularly the biggest crook of a president that this
country has ever seen.

When he likes it, it's "I", and "my", etc.
Whe it's bad, it's the IRS and the CIA.

Where will our crook show his face today?

The dukester, American - American

********************************************
Repeal Obama
You simply can't fix stupid.
********************************************

Harold Burton

unread,

May 12, 2013, 11:15:02 AM5/12/13

to

In article <9g8vo85gtpcmbu94l...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> No, sorry . . . .

Yes and you are sorry.

snicker

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 12, 2013, 12:22:17 PM5/12/13

to

In article <dnruo8l2fctroants...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

� It mostly WAS Democrat Mike but when Democrats started pushing to
improve immigration laws, the Klan switched to backing Neo-con
Republicans.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 12, 2013, 12:24:30 PM5/12/13

to

In article <CDB5123E.9B725%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby

� zzz zzzz

opel

unread,

May 12, 2013, 1:44:41 PM5/12/13

to

On 5/12/2013 8:09 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> SNICKER
>
>
> Most
Sad faced old clown:

http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/rapidcityjournal.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/a/80/a80c33ed-5d3a-582f-8a41-f76aec29a111/5165a285579a6.preview-620.jpg

Mike Smith

unread,

May 12, 2013, 2:08:41 PM5/12/13

to

Nope.

Mike Smith

George Kerby

unread,

May 12, 2013, 2:43:39 PM5/12/13

to

On 5/12/13 11:24 AM, in article r-1205130...@10.0.1.3, "�RLMeasures"

Yep. Asleep again as usual as DimTards led by DumboEars. HillaryBitch and
LubeJob Pelosi ruin the Country.

Message has been deleted

Paul Duca

unread,

May 12, 2013, 3:59:28 PM5/12/13

to

On Sunday, May 12, 2013 2:43:39 PM UTC-4, George Kerby wrote:
> On 5/12/13 11:24 AM, in article r-1205130...@10.0.1.3, "ï¿½RLMeasures"

>
> <r...@somis.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article <CDB5123E.9B725%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
>
> > <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
>

> >> On 5/11/13 4:18 PM, in article r-1105131...@10.0.1.3, "ï¿½RLMeasures"

>
> >> <r...@somis.org> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> In article <20130511135651.196$0...@newsreader.com>,
>
> >>> dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>>> r...@somis.org (ï¿½RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >>>>> In article <CDB3C1CD.9B6E4%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
>
> >>>>> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>>> On 5/10/13 10:10 PM, in article r-1005132...@10.0.1.3,
>

> >>>>>> "ï¿½RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>> In article
>
> >>>>>>> <c5a1ec79-6a71-48fd...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> >>>>>>> Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>> On May 10, 4:44=A0pm, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>> From Drudge:
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> =A0Neo-cons may say anything about Obama.
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>> Are you one of those highly informed democrats who thinks Matt
>
> >>>>>>>> Drudge writes all those articles he links to?
>
> >>>>>>>
>

> >>>>>>> ï¿½ I am a Republican. I voted for Tricky Dick Nixon.

>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>> And you are full of shit as well...
>
> >>>>>
>

> >>>>> ï¿½ Everybody is. I also voted for Barry Goldwater despite the snake

>
> >>>>> handling thing.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Goldwater was a good man. He wouldn't have anything to do with the current
>
> >>>> GOP. Especially in Arizona.
>
> >>>
>

> >>> ï¿½ agreed

>
> >>>
>
> >>>> The GOP is not looking for good men, these
>
> >>>> days.
>
> >>>
>

> >>> ï¿½ they are looking for sheeple who question nothing.

>
> >>
>
> >> Like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz who never question, right?
>
> >
>

> > ï¿½ zzz zzzz

>
> >>
>
> >> Typical LibTard response coming folks. Watch-this should be GOOD!
>
>
>
> Yep. Asleep again as usual as DimTards led by DumboEars. HillaryBitch and
>
> LubeJob Pelosi ruin the Country.

I wish I could pretend God would get off the pot and get some Republican to do ANYTHING for me...I don't count blaming the gays and Muslims for everything--I'm nowhere as drunk...I mean, easy to distract.

Paul

Paul Duca

unread,

May 12, 2013, 4:01:34 PM5/12/13

to

On Sunday, May 12, 2013 3:33:07 PM UTC-4, Denny wrote:
> r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>

> Their principle put simply:
>
> What's good for the Corporations and the wealthy is good for all of
>
> America. I've done some selling in my time, and I wouldn't want to be a
>
> sales rep pushing that product.

They've got plenty of never-to-be-paid promotion reps--like those here--pushign the product.

Paul

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 12, 2013, 4:25:01 PM5/12/13

to

In article <pkmvo8ht9hhm69msa...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

<m...@wt.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 May 2013 09:22:17 -0700, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <dnruo8l2fctroants...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith
> ><m...@wt.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 11 May 2013 20:07:24 -0700, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <ojeto89qi5sojj1nq...@4ax.com>,
> >> >Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sat, 11 May 2013 14:16:17 -0700, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> As the DimRats sleep with KKK Grand Dragons. Fact, Jack!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >� bizarre.
> >> >>
> >> >> Only if you don't stand up and remind kerbyloon the genesis of the KKK
> >> >> and who they eventually supported---(and why)
> >> >
> >> >� I won't.
> >>
> >> I understand. The KKK was and is an exclusive democrat organization.
> >>
> >> Mike Smith
> >
> >� It mostly WAS Democrat Mike but when Democrats started pushing to
> >improve immigration laws, the Klan switched to backing Neo-con
> >Republicans.
>
> Nope.
>
> Mike Smith

� saying so does not make it so.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 12, 2013, 4:25:57 PM5/12/13

to

In article <CDB54D0B.9B7E2%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby

� ____

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 12, 2013, 4:28:16 PM5/12/13

to

In article <20130512153307.886$Z...@newsreader.com>,

dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:

> r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:

> Their principle put simply:
> What's good for the Corporations and the wealthy is good for all of
> America. I've done some selling in my time, and I wouldn't want to be a
> sales rep pushing that product.

� that's it in a nutshell.

Message has been deleted

Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E

unread,

May 12, 2013, 5:45:18 PM5/12/13

to

On May 12, 2:33 pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:

> > In article <9leto8hm8mci5a8hafvurihjuhun481...@4ax.com>,

> Their principle put simply:
> What's good for the Corporations and the wealthy is good for all of
> America. I've done some selling in my time, and I wouldn't want to be a

> sales rep pushing that product.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Oh? So who exactly produces jobs and wealth?? Obama's government?

Mike Smith

unread,

May 12, 2013, 6:16:43 PM5/12/13

to

No it is not.

What was described is a libtard's delusional myth about what y'all
"think" is happening, due to your lack of any logic, common sense, and
critical thought process.

Mike Smith

unread,

May 12, 2013, 10:07:27 PM5/12/13

to

In article <s650p8dovtk39ng8p...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

� that's history. With a nigger Democrat in the Whitehouse, I doubt that
the KKK is pro-Dem. The only thing that could possibly be more irritating
to a Klansman would be if the First Lady was white, and she was pregnant
with triplets. .

Message has been deleted

•RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 4:53:43 AM5/13/13

to

In article <20130513003048.945$4...@newsreader.com>,
dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:

> It's the bedrock basis of conservative "thought". Name me one politician or
> group of them that ever butted heads with the wealthy or the corporations,
> even once. There is only one major exception, but I won't tell, see if you
> can guess it. I'm talking abut the last 60 years, 3 generations. And don't
> talk about Sylindra, are whatever it was called. I mean major industries.

• no guesses.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 4:55:12 AM5/13/13

to

In article <tgr0p8dlq277hjlag...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Sun, 12 May 2013 19:01:09 -0700, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> >> Their principle put simply:
> >> >> What's good for the Corporations and the wealthy is good for all of
> >> >> America. I've done some selling in my time, and I wouldn't want to be a
> >> >> sales rep pushing that product.
> >> >
> >> >� that's it in a nutshell.
> >>
> >> No it is not.
> >>
> >> What was described is a libtard's delusional myth about what y'all
> >> "think" is happening, due to your lack of any logic, common sense, and
> >> critical thought process.
> >>
> >� Mike == do you believe in "trickle down"?
>

> Only when he has to squat to pee.

� Tricle down works well in large public urinals.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 4:58:32 AM5/13/13

to

In article <20130513011551.494$W...@newsreader.com>,

> There was a saying about him back then:
> "Ninty percent of the time, he's drunk. And the rest of the time, he's
> wrong."

� The bottom line is that it's a blunder for a Congress man to try to
pull strings for his boyfriend.

Mike Smith

unread,

May 13, 2013, 6:55:33 AM5/13/13

to

On 13 May 2013 04:10:10 GMT, dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:

>"Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burto...@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>> On May 12, 2:33=A0pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
>> > r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:
>> > > In article <9leto8hm8mci5a8hafvurihjuhun481...@4ax.com>,
>> > > Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> >
>> > > > On Sat, 11 May 2013 14:18:36 -0700, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures)

>> > > > wrot=

>> e:
>> >
>> > > > >>The GOP is not looking for good men, these
>> > > > >> days.
>> >

>> > > > > =A0they are looking for sheeple who question nothing.

>> >
>> > > > They already have the "sheeple"----and what they "listen to" are
>> > > > "crafted messages"
>> >
>> > > > A lot of public statements by leading wingers have used the phrase:
>> > > > "we need to 'craft a new message'---and it hasn't seemed to
>> > > > register on those supporters that in the behavior, the policy, and
>> > > > the goals which are outside credibility---that selling the same
>> > > > shit with a different coat of paint is stupid.
>> >
>> > > > There is a chasm between a conservative "principle" and the

>> > > > behavior, policy and goals which they eventually do. =A0The greed
>> > > > and hypocrisy=

>> is
>> > > > painted over with a rhetorical coating---.
>> >

>> > > =A0alas.

>> >
>> > Their principle put simply:
>> > What's good for the Corporations and the wealthy is good for all of
>> > America. I've done some selling in my time, and I wouldn't want to be a
>> > sales rep pushing that product.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Oh? So who exactly produces jobs and wealth?? Obama's government?
>

>The middle class, created by the GI Bill and unionization {libtard myth}. Their money goes
>to grocery stores, car dealerships, colleges, local retail sales. The poor
>help also. Their money goes directly into local economies. The wealthy do
>like Mitt. They put thier money into hedge funds. Investment banks. Like
>Mitt, into Swiss and Cayman Island banks. We discussed all this last year.
>Romney's company didn't make anything except money. Of course the wealthy
>spend their money on things, also. Boats, European autos, servants' wages.
>Luxury real estate. These things don't really create jobs.

Thanks for posting proof that you are a fool.

Here is a desperately needed free clue: Rich people need clothing,
food, and shelter, just like poor people and middle class people.
Guess who produces those houses, food, and clothing?
Guess who sells those houses, food and clothing?
Guess who transports the food and clothing and gas and everything else
anyone buys?

It is called the workers of America and the more they work, the more
money they make, and the more money the federal government takes in.
In fact, if the idiots in our federal government , right now, had
followed Bush's gameplan, half the people out of jobs would have them,
and the federal government would be taking in around $400 billion MORE
dollars each year.

Consider yourself humiliated, fool.

Mike Smith

Mike Smith

unread,

May 13, 2013, 6:59:53 AM5/13/13

to

I doubt that any libtard knows what "trickle down" means.
Let me educate you:

When the rich spend money, the people receiving the extra money will
spend it on stuff other people made, causing other people to spend
their newly acquired extra money on stuff other people made, causing
them to spend that money on other stuff. etc...

That works each and every time it is tried.

Mike Smith

Mike Smith

unread,

May 13, 2013, 7:04:20 AM5/13/13

to

On 13 May 2013 04:30:48 GMT, dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:

>Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:

>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 13:28:16 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>>
>> >In article <20130512153307.886$Z...@newsreader.com>,
>> >dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
>> >
>> >> r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>> >> > In article <9leto8hm8mci5a8ha...@4ax.com>,
>> >> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> >> >

>> >> > > On Sat, 11 May 2013 14:18:36 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures)

>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >>The GOP is not looking for good men, these
>> >> > > >> days.
>> >> > > >

>> >> > > >�ｿｽ they are looking for sheeple who question nothing.

>> >> > >
>> >> > > They already have the "sheeple"----and what they "listen to" are
>> >> > > "crafted messages"
>> >> > >
>> >> > > A lot of public statements by leading wingers have used the
>> >> > > phrase: "we need to 'craft a new message'---and it hasn't seemed
>> >> > > to register on those supporters that in the behavior, the policy,
>> >> > > and the goals which are outside credibility---that selling the
>> >> > > same shit with a different coat of paint is stupid.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There is a chasm between a conservative "principle" and the
>> >> > > behavior, policy and goals which they eventually do. The greed
>> >> > > and hypocrisy is painted over with a rhetorical coating---.
>> >> > >

>> >> > �ｿｽ alas.

>> >>
>> >> Their principle put simply:
>> >> What's good for the Corporations and the wealthy is good for all of
>> >> America. I've done some selling in my time, and I wouldn't want to be
>> >> a sales rep pushing that product.
>> >

>> >�ｿｽ that's it in a nutshell.

>>
>> No it is not.
>>
>> What was described is a libtard's delusional myth about what y'all
>> "think" is happening, due to your lack of any logic, common sense, and
>> critical thought process.
>>
>> Mike Smith
>

>It's the bedrock basis of conservative "thought". Name me one politician or
>group of them that ever butted heads with the wealthy or the corporations,
>even once. There is only one major exception, but I won't tell, see if you
>can guess it. I'm talking abut the last 60 years, 3 generations. And don't
>talk about Sylindra, are whatever it was called. I mean major industries.

No corporations and no wealthy = Zimbabwe or Somalia.
Are those the countries you want to mimic, fool?

I have a long-standing rule. I only work for wealthy people. I like to
depend on that paycheck every payday.
I have never received a job from a poor person.

Mike Smith

Mike Smith

unread,

May 13, 2013, 7:06:03 AM5/13/13

to

OK, so you are a KKK sympathizer and claim to be a republican.
Thanks for proving my point.

Mike Smith

•RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 8:35:39 AM5/13/13

to

In article <llh1p856503v0lq6k...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

• You failed.

>
> When the rich spend money, the people receiving the extra money will
> spend it on stuff other people made, causing other people to spend
> their newly acquired extra money on stuff other people made, causing
> them to spend that money on other stuff. etc...
>
> That works each and every time it is tried.

• Not under Reagan and not under "W". The reason is because the wealthy
typically do Not spend more money when tax rates on them decline.
>
> Mike Smith

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 8:41:23 AM5/13/13

to

In article <17i1p8tr6jccsq843...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith

� I am not.

>and claim to be a republican.

� I am a registered Republican.

> Thanks for proving my point.
>

� so take a victory lap with "Duke" / Earl Weber and you can pat each
other on the back as you run your victory laps.
> Mike Smith

George Kerby

unread,

May 13, 2013, 9:30:26 AM5/13/13

to

On 5/13/13 6:06 AM, in article 17i1p8tr6jccsq843...@4ax.com,
"Mike Smith" <m...@wt.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 May 2013 19:07:27 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>
>> In article <s650p8dovtk39ng8p...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith
>> <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>>

>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 13:25:01 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <pkmvo8ht9hhm69msa...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith
>>>> <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 09:22:17 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <dnruo8l2fctroants...@4ax.com>, Mike Smith
>>>>>> <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 20:07:24 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <ojeto89qi5sojj1nq...@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 14:16:17 -0700, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As the DimRats sleep with KKK Grand Dragons. Fact, Jack!
>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> �ｿｽ bizarre.

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't stand up and remind kerbyloon the genesis of
>> the KKK
>>>>>>>>> and who they eventually supported---(and why)
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> �ｿｽ I won't.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand. The KKK was and is an exclusive democrat organization.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Smith
>>>>>>

>>>>>> �ｿｽ It mostly WAS Democrat Mike but when Democrats started pushing to

>>>>>> improve immigration laws, the Klan switched to backing Neo-con
>>>>>> Republicans.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Smith
>>>>

>>>> �ｿｽ saying so does not make it so.

>>>
>>> I was just stating the obvious. The KKK has always been a democrat
>>> party affiliate, with a very few republicans thrown in, just because.
>>>
>>> Mike Smith
>>

>> �ｿｽ that's history. With a nigger Democrat in the Whitehouse, I doubt that

>> the KKK is pro-Dem. The only thing that could possibly be more irritating
>> to a Klansman would be if the First Lady was white, and she was pregnant
>> with triplets. .
>
> OK, so you are a KKK sympathizer and claim to be a republican.
> Thanks for proving my point.
>
> Mike Smith

When he is on one of his all night binges (check the timestamp) like last
night, he slips up and the truth comes out. You wonder how he can manage the
time to do that if he really had a job or any responsibilities. No, Measures
is nothing but another bitter welfare recipient mad at anyone who would try
and take away his government money. No wonder his state isslowly falling
into an abyss, and I ain't talking the Pacific Ocean.

�RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 10:21:52 AM5/13/13

to

In article <CDB651A6.9B8A0%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby

<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 5/12/13 8:54 PM, in article r-1205131...@10.0.1.3, "�RLMeasures"
> <r...@somis.org> wrote:
>
> > In article <3nvvo8ph5cve60lpq...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 13:25:57 -0700, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <CDB54D0B.9B7E2%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
> >>> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>> The GOP is not looking for good men, these
> >>>>>>>> days.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> � they are looking for sheeple who question nothing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz who never question, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> � zzz zzzz
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Typical LibTard response coming folks. Watch-this should be GOOD!
> >>>>
> >>>> Yep. Asleep again as usual as DimTards led by DumboEars. HillaryBitch and
> >>>> LubeJob Pelosi ruin the Country.
> >>>
> >>> � ____
> >>
> >> How fortunate that KerbyLoon exemplifies the typical knuckle-dragging
> >> conservative character.
> >>
> >> (and we don't have to pay him anything)
> >
> > � he does it well.
>
> Yogurt boi and you are SO 'progressive'!
>
> Perhaps you two can get a room and 'explore' each others' possessions, eh?

� Perhaps not.

•RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 10:22:54 AM5/13/13

to

In article <CDB65207.9B8A1%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby

• ___

•RLMeasures

unread,

May 13, 2013, 10:25:53 AM5/13/13

to

In article <CDB652BA.9B8A3%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby

• A fan of the KKK I am not. I went to segregated kindergarten. Alas,
Puck was right.

Message has been deleted

Kenny McCormack

unread,

May 13, 2013, 11:19:48 AM5/13/13

to

In article <s9h1p8lf815khsvh7...@4ax.com>,
Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
...
>In fact, if the fucking loons in our federal government , right now, had
>followed Bush's gameplan, all of the people out of jobs would have them,
>and the federal government would be taking in around $400 million gazillion MORE
>dollars each second.

Like I've been saying. If you're gonnna make shit up, make it good. Do it right!

--
(This discussion group is about C, ...)

Wrong. It is only OCCASIONALLY a discussion group
about C; mostly, like most "discussion" groups, it is
off-topic Rorsharch [sic] revelations of the childhood
traumas of the participants...