Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Is Obama And His Administration Anti-Christian?
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Tracey12
May 19, 2013, 8:28:19 PM5/19/13
to
In the old Soviet Union, being a Christian was unapproved. Bibles
were considered anti-state, and those who believed in Christ had to
meet secretly.
Throughout history, dictators, communists, and authoritarians have
viewed religion as a threat to the state. This week, we learned that
the Obama administration's IRS leaders have viewed Christians as such
a threat, the agency demanded to know the content of Christian's
prayers.
Does Obama and his minions want total allegiance to the State?
Why in the world would a government administration in America demand
to know the content of people's prayers??? Isn't that government
completely out of control?
WHAT WOULD OUR FOUNDERS SAY ABOUT GOVERNMENT INTERFERING IN THE LIVES
OF AMERICANS DEMANDING TO KNOW THE CONTENT OF THEIR PRAYERS?
WHERE ARE THE RADICALS AT THE A.C.L. U.?
ISN'T THIS A VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND
STATE?
ISN'T THIS REALLY HARASSMENT OF CHRISTIANS BECAUSE OBAMA OPPOSES THEIR
BELIEFS AND VIEWS THEM AND THEIR ORGANIZATIONS AS A THREAT?
were considered anti-state, and those who believed in Christ had to
meet secretly.
Throughout history, dictators, communists, and authoritarians have
viewed religion as a threat to the state. This week, we learned that
the Obama administration's IRS leaders have viewed Christians as such
a threat, the agency demanded to know the content of Christian's
prayers.
Does Obama and his minions want total allegiance to the State?
Why in the world would a government administration in America demand
to know the content of people's prayers??? Isn't that government
completely out of control?
WHAT WOULD OUR FOUNDERS SAY ABOUT GOVERNMENT INTERFERING IN THE LIVES
OF AMERICANS DEMANDING TO KNOW THE CONTENT OF THEIR PRAYERS?
WHERE ARE THE RADICALS AT THE A.C.L. U.?
ISN'T THIS A VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND
STATE?
ISN'T THIS REALLY HARASSMENT OF CHRISTIANS BECAUSE OBAMA OPPOSES THEIR
BELIEFS AND VIEWS THEM AND THEIR ORGANIZATIONS AS A THREAT?
wy
May 19, 2013, 8:38:29 PM5/19/13
to
domestic terrorism with the way they expected to be treated as first
class citizens with their rights superseding all others' rights. If
that isn't terrorism, I don't know what is.
opel
May 19, 2013, 9:16:02 PM5/19/13
to
On 5/19/2013 6:38 PM, wy wrote:
> I certainly hope so.
http://amplicate.com/hate/canada/4375779-corrupt-federal-court-provincial-judges-police/
Corrupt Federal Court & Provincial Judges& Police
+6 by Major Nourhaghighi K
The Governmental of Canada, including all provincial and local
governments, are a worst Criminal Organization that instituted in
Canada. Except those who are simple servants and have no links to the
crimes; the Key Servants of the Crown, including many Judges, Police and
Lawyers, are the main cause of serve Hate toward the British, Queen and
Canada. For example, I, Major Keyvan Nourhaghighi, in 1995 and 1996, I
discovered few Judges, Lawyers and Police were involved in smuggling of
Heroin from IRAN. I filed lawsuit T-1900-96 against the Crown. Chief
Justice Richard allowed my lawsuit. But, soon Nine members of Toronto
Police, 52 Div arrested me and tortured me at Old city Hall. Later, RCMP
was successful to charge Toronto Police for smuggling, conspiracy and
torture. However, the Crown, intentionally delayed the prosecution, and
corrupt Justice Ian Nordheimer stayed the prosecution. The reason that I
am calling Justice Ian Nordheimer as corrupt judge is that on the same
year, for the same cause of action, where I was the plaintiff, he did
not apply the same Charter principle that applied for corrupt police
constables. Another case, we all knew that the Attorney General of
Ontario, Michael Bryant, was drunk and while he was driving
intentionally killed a poor hardworking Canadian cyclist Darcy Sheppard.
Toronto Police charged him with Dangerous Driving, but the corrupt
Attorney General drop the charges, that even a KILLER did not stand
before a trial judge. SO, this Justice System and Government are NOT
here to protect People with the LAW under Constructional Rights. Strong
corporations like Banks, Rogers, Bell, Crown and hundreds other CAN
simple steal from People; Police and their agents can kill and torture
us, and WE have no "court" no "judge" to punish them and return our
damages... Simply search my name NOURHAGHIGHI in all Ontario and federal
Courts and read my pleadings and review hundreds of judgments that no
judges ever punished the criminals
> I certainly hope so.
http://amplicate.com/hate/canada/4375779-corrupt-federal-court-provincial-judges-police/
Corrupt Federal Court & Provincial Judges& Police
+6 by Major Nourhaghighi K
The Governmental of Canada, including all provincial and local
governments, are a worst Criminal Organization that instituted in
Canada. Except those who are simple servants and have no links to the
crimes; the Key Servants of the Crown, including many Judges, Police and
Lawyers, are the main cause of serve Hate toward the British, Queen and
Canada. For example, I, Major Keyvan Nourhaghighi, in 1995 and 1996, I
discovered few Judges, Lawyers and Police were involved in smuggling of
Heroin from IRAN. I filed lawsuit T-1900-96 against the Crown. Chief
Justice Richard allowed my lawsuit. But, soon Nine members of Toronto
Police, 52 Div arrested me and tortured me at Old city Hall. Later, RCMP
was successful to charge Toronto Police for smuggling, conspiracy and
torture. However, the Crown, intentionally delayed the prosecution, and
corrupt Justice Ian Nordheimer stayed the prosecution. The reason that I
am calling Justice Ian Nordheimer as corrupt judge is that on the same
year, for the same cause of action, where I was the plaintiff, he did
not apply the same Charter principle that applied for corrupt police
constables. Another case, we all knew that the Attorney General of
Ontario, Michael Bryant, was drunk and while he was driving
intentionally killed a poor hardworking Canadian cyclist Darcy Sheppard.
Toronto Police charged him with Dangerous Driving, but the corrupt
Attorney General drop the charges, that even a KILLER did not stand
before a trial judge. SO, this Justice System and Government are NOT
here to protect People with the LAW under Constructional Rights. Strong
corporations like Banks, Rogers, Bell, Crown and hundreds other CAN
simple steal from People; Police and their agents can kill and torture
us, and WE have no "court" no "judge" to punish them and return our
damages... Simply search my name NOURHAGHIGHI in all Ontario and federal
Courts and read my pleadings and review hundreds of judgments that no
judges ever punished the criminals
Message has been deleted
wy
May 19, 2013, 9:28:41 PM5/19/13
to
On 19 May, 21:16, opel <a...@novalid.org.> wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 6:38 PM, wy wrote:> I certainly hope so.
>
> http://amplicate.com/hate/canada/4375779-corrupt-federal-court-provin...
> On 5/19/2013 6:38 PM, wy wrote:> I certainly hope so.
>
>
> &
?
Hell Stomper
May 19, 2013, 10:11:33 PM5/19/13
to
wy
May 19, 2013, 10:20:15 PM5/19/13
to
?
Message has been deleted
Tracey12
May 20, 2013, 6:56:44 AM5/20/13
to
On May 19, 7:38 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> I certainly hope so. ALL religions are a threat - they're a form of
> domestic terrorism with the way they expected to be treated as first
> class citizens with their rights superseding all others' rights. If
> that isn't terrorism, I don't know what is.
Now you're displaying your lack of education.
> I certainly hope so. ALL religions are a threat - they're a form of
> domestic terrorism with the way they expected to be treated as first
> class citizens with their rights superseding all others' rights. If
> that isn't terrorism, I don't know what is.
What has been responsible for more murders over the past 100 years?
1. Specific religions, or specific churches
or
2. Governments
The answer is governments. Since 1900, governments have murdered
citizens so often, the number is nearly impossible to define, but it
is known that governments have killed tens of millions. No group of
religious individuals or specific churches have come close to killing
this number of innocents.
So your remark above is without merit.
Joe Cooper
May 20, 2013, 11:03:51 AM5/20/13
to
Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in news:799c40b5-d541-49a6-84bf-
fd9060...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
Of course it is. The bottom line here is that proggies detest religion,
regardless, and justify absolutely anything big governments do -
regardless.
Witness the proggie love for Fidel and his murderous thug Che, and
proggie Hollywood's fascination with scumbag third world dictators.
For a good take on the proggie assault on religion, I recommend Ben
Shapiro's "Bullies."
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/
Leftists think and act like protofascists. Control is the key. And
control through fear, threat of force, and rhetorical intimidation
is the modus operandi. (Ben Shapro, "Bullies")
fd9060...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
regardless, and justify absolutely anything big governments do -
regardless.
Witness the proggie love for Fidel and his murderous thug Che, and
proggie Hollywood's fascination with scumbag third world dictators.
For a good take on the proggie assault on religion, I recommend Ben
Shapiro's "Bullies."
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/
Leftists think and act like protofascists. Control is the key. And
control through fear, threat of force, and rhetorical intimidation
is the modus operandi. (Ben Shapro, "Bullies")
Paul Duca
May 21, 2013, 12:10:07 AM5/21/13
to
On Monday, May 20, 2013 11:03:51 AM UTC-4, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in news:799c40b5-d541-49a6-84bf-
>
> fd9060...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> > On May 19, 7:38ápm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in news:799c40b5-d541-49a6-84bf-
>
> fd9060...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> I certainly hope so. áALL religions are a threat - they're a form of
>
> >> domestic terrorism with the way they expected to be treated as first
>
> >> class citizens with their rights superseding all others' rights. áIf
> >> domestic terrorism with the way they expected to be treated as first
>
>
> >> that isn't terrorism, I don't know what is.
>
> >
>
> > Now you're displaying your lack of education.
>
> >
>
> > What has been responsible for more murders over the past 100 years?
>
> >
>
> > 1. Specific religions, or specific churches
>
> >
>
> > or
>
> >
>
> > 2. Governments
>
> >
>
> > The answer is governments. Since 1900, governments have murdered
>
> > citizens so often, the number is nearly impossible to define, but it
>
> > is known that governments have killed tens of millions. No group of
>
> > religious individuals or specific churches have come close to killing
>
> > this number of innocents.
>
> >
>
> > So your remark above is without merit.
>
>
>
> Of course it is. The bottom line here is that proggies detest religion,
>
> regardless, and justify absolutely anything big governments do -
>
> regardless.
>
>
>
> Witness the proggie love for Fidel and his murderous thug Che, and
>
> proggie Hollywood's fascination with scumbag third world dictators.
>
>
>
> For a good take on the proggie assault on religion, I recommend Ben
>
> Shapiro's "Bullies."
>
Ben Shapiro's religion isn't the same as most of the good Republicans he adores, and shouldn't complain if they ever want to pack HIM off somewhere for that reason.
> >> that isn't terrorism, I don't know what is.
>
> >
>
> > Now you're displaying your lack of education.
>
> >
>
> > What has been responsible for more murders over the past 100 years?
>
> >
>
> > 1. Specific religions, or specific churches
>
> >
>
> > or
>
> >
>
> > 2. Governments
>
> >
>
> > The answer is governments. Since 1900, governments have murdered
>
> > citizens so often, the number is nearly impossible to define, but it
>
> > is known that governments have killed tens of millions. No group of
>
> > religious individuals or specific churches have come close to killing
>
> > this number of innocents.
>
> >
>
> > So your remark above is without merit.
>
>
>
> Of course it is. The bottom line here is that proggies detest religion,
>
> regardless, and justify absolutely anything big governments do -
>
> regardless.
>
>
>
> Witness the proggie love for Fidel and his murderous thug Che, and
>
> proggie Hollywood's fascination with scumbag third world dictators.
>
>
>
> For a good take on the proggie assault on religion, I recommend Ben
>
> Shapiro's "Bullies."
>
Also, don't buddy up to Tracey if you have a daughter of 12 or 13, Joe...HIS religion says God REQUIRES him to have sex with her.
Paul
0 new messages