Actress Hopes Hurricane Kills 'Every Pro-Life, Xenophobic, Gay-Bashing SOB'…

[Tracey12]

Ellen Barkin Hopes Hurricane Kills 'Every Pro-Life, Xenophobic, Gay-
Bashing SOB' At The RNC



(LifeSiteNews.com) - In the aftermath of the Family Research Council
shooting, prominent voices on the Left have not tapped down their
violent rhetoric against their opponents. Two Baby Boomer celebrities
have taken to Twitter to hope pro-life, pro-family individuals and
U.S. Congressman Todd Akin suffer a drowning or a same-sex rape,
respectively.

On Sunday, Ellen Barkin expressed her hope that Tropical Storm Isaac
would smash up the Republican National Convention in Tampa and drown
all its delegates.

http://nation.foxnews.com/ellen-barkin/2012/08/28/ellen-barkin-hopes-hurricane-kills-every-pro-life-xenophobic-gay-bashing-sob-rnc

[Billary]

>  http://nation.foxnews.com/ellen-barkin/2012/08/28/ellen-barkin-hopes-...

Who is Ellen barkin?

[Ramon F. Herrera]

> Who is Ellen Barkin?

See her in "The Big Easy" - She was HOT then.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092654/

-Ramon

ps: Is your ignorance genuine or pretend???

[Billary]

Like I said. Who is Ellen barkin and why does she matter?

[Ramon F Herrera]

Google (and IMDB) are your friend.

> and why does she matter?

Ask Tracey. She knows "the best advice my father ever gave me" - you
obviously don't.

-Ramon

[Billary]

Why the fuck do I care about what some Hollywood actress has to say
about anything? That's your problem Ramoncito.

You give a fuck about what nobodys who know nothing about nothing have
to say.

And I don't. That makes me clearly superior to you.

[Ramon F Herrera]

I guess you are not in politics, then. Silly me, I thought this was a
POLITICAL NG.

-Ramon

[Ramon F Herrera]

On Aug 28, 10:14 am, Billary <billaryclinton2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That makes me clearly superior to you.

Must be in ground elevation, since here in Houston it is rather flat
and low.

-Ramon

[lib_duster]

On 8/28/2012 9:18 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> Why the fuck do I care about what some Hollywood actress
> > has to say about anything?
>
> I guess you are not in politics, then. Silly me, I thought

That's you problem, puta - you never think, you just knee jerk.

Now fuck off and die.

[lib_duster]

On 8/28/2012 9:24 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> here in Houston it is rather flat
> and low.

Go lie in traffic.

[lib_duster]

On 8/28/2012 8:43 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> See her in "The Big Easy" - She was HOT then.

See her now, washed up old hateful skank.

[jane]

I think it is interesting that any word out of the mouth of Limbaugh,
Hannity or any right winger is "hate speech" but they can not find it
in themselves condemn a liberal who says, "“C’mon #Isaac! Wash every
pro-life, anti-education, anti-woman, xenophobic, gay-bashing, racist
SOB right into the ocean! #RNC ”

[FirstPost]

A third rate actress that works in 2nd rate movies.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000289/

[FirstPost]

What does a third rate actress that hasn't had a major project in
years have to do with politics?
Not a goddamned thing other than giving her own uneducated hateful
opinion that you share with her.
And yes, you are one silly son of a bitch to be giving so much
credence to a bimbo that hopes thousands of innocents die for not
believing in what her dumbass believes in.

[FirstPost]

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT), jane <jane....@gmail.com>
wrote:

To expect a biogoted pile of dogshit like Ramon to be anything but
hypocritical is illogical.

[Al]

In article
<1c03c046-2739-48d6...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,

Ok, if you;re going to elevate her unhinged rant to the level of politics,
do you agree with her?

[NoBody]

Missed this the media -- probably because she's a lib and they only
report when conservatives say such things.

[Mike Painter]

On 8/28/2012 8:00 AM, Billary wrote:

>>
>>> On Aug 28, 10:28 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Ellen Barkin Hopes Hurricane Kills 'Every Pro-Life, Xenophobic, Gay-
>>>> Bashing SOB' At The RNC
>>
>>>> (LifeSiteNews.com) - In the aftermath of the Family Research Council
>>>> shooting, prominent voices on the Left have not tapped down their
>>>> violent rhetoric against their opponents. Two Baby Boomer celebrities
>>>> have taken to Twitter to hope pro-life, pro-family individuals and
>>>> U.S. Congressman Todd Akin suffer a drowning or a same-sex rape,
>>>> respectively.
>>
>>>> On Sunday, Ellen Barkin expressed her hope that Tropical Storm Isaac
>>>> would smash up the Republican National Convention in Tampa and drown
>>>> all its delegates.
>>
>>>> http://nation.foxnews.com/ellen-barkin/2012/08/28/ellen-barkin-hopes-...
>>
>> > Who is Ellen Barkin?
>>
>> See her in "The Big Easy" - She was HOT then.
>>
>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092654/
>>
>> -Ramon
>>
>> ps: Is your ignorance genuine or pretend???
>
> Like I said. Who is Ellen barkin and why does she matter?
>

The late Danny Thomas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Thomas) was
once asked a political question on live TV.
He refused to answer.
He said that some people might, because of his position as a star,
believe he had any more knowledge than they did about a subject.

Need I mention Ronald or Arnold?

[skink on sink]

Dunno, the former remade America:

http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow/kudlow200406100915.asp

Economists were vexed during the 1970s, as unemployment and inflation
rose together to stifle economic growth and all forms of investment. The
Keynesian Phillips-curve paradigm, whereby employment and inflation are
supposed to move in opposite directions, completely broke down. The Ivy
League formula of increasing the money supply to spur growth, and high
taxes to hold back inflation, had failed utterly.

Between the late 1960s and 1980, the U.S. inflation rate rose from 2
percent to 14 percent, while the unemployment rate gradually drifted
higher, from 4 percent to almost 10 percent. It was a period of decline
for the country. Americans were demoralized.

As stagflation became more deeply embedded in the U.S. economy, Soviet
adventurism in Central and South America, Asia, and elsewhere around the
world became more pronounced. The Soviets saw the U.S. cut and run from
Vietnam. Our Cold War adversary saw nothing but weakness emanating from
the U.S.

Ronald Reagan changed all that. From the moment of his swearing-in in
Jan� uary 1981, with his extraordinarily strong character and deep and
abiding faith in God, Reagan acted relentlessly to revive the nation.

More than any modern president, Reagan understood the link between
economic growth at home and American strength overseas. It was the
Gipper�s most brilliant insight. He acted swiftly to show our enemies
that we would produce the necessary economic resources to do whatever it
would take, for however long was necessary, to triumph over the
Communist menace.

Immediately upon assuming office, he reversed the economic policy of the
decline years. He brought down marginal tax rates, restoring the
incentives necessary for economic growth. He gave Federal Reserve
chairman Paul Volcker the strong ground to stand on, allowing him to
harden the value of the dollar and slay inflation.

At bottom, what became known as Reaganomics was a new pro-growth policy
mix of tax incentives at the margin and stable money. But there was
more. The Californian launched a massive military buildup totaling about
$1.5 trillion. He deregulated oil prices, proving the conventional
wisdom wrong as energy became much cheaper. He launched U.S.-Canadian
free trade. He was unyielding in his opposition to the air-traffic
controllers� strike, firing thousands of these government workers and
ending the anti-growth union stranglehold on private industry. He
created individual retirement accounts and 401(k)s, giving birth to the
investor class. He also slashed social spending by reducing domestic
program levels (excluding Social Security and health care) by nearly $50
billion in 1981. That amount would come to about $90 billion today.

By 1986, Reagan�s tax-reform plan left two marginal rates of 28 percent
and 15 percent, a long stone�s throw from the 70 percent top rate he had
inherited. His plan also cut about 2,000 pages from the tax code.

Ideas matter. Results quickly followed for Reagan. Between 1982 and
1989, the economy grew, adjusting for inflation, by 35 percent: more
than 4.5 percent per year. As growth was restored, tax revenues came
flowing in. Income-tax revenues grew by 50 percent during this period
even as tax rates dropped. By 1986, the inflation rate had fallen to 1
percent. By the end of his term, unemployment had dropped to 5.5
percent. Interest rates had plunged. The stock market had soared.

From July 1982 through the end of 1988, the S&P 500 averaged a near 21
percent annual gain. Brand-new industries arose in computing, software,
communications, and the Internet � original endeavors that completely
streamlined and transformed the American economy for the decades to
come. In effect, Reaganomics launched a 20-year boom, the longest
prosperity period in the 20th century.

Reagan critics to this day continue to harp on deficits and debt, rather
than the growth miracle produced by Reaganomics. But they are factually
wrong. Reagan inherited a budget gap of roughly 2.5 percent of the
economy. By the end of his two terms, he left it exactly where he found
it. In between, he restored our economic health and revitalized our
standing around the world.

By the time of his summit meetings with Soviet chairman Gorbachev,
Reagan was able to say calmly and diplomatically that the U.S. could
produce the goods and the Soviets could not. In the next few years, the
Berlin Wall came down and the Soviet Union collapsed.

Reagan�s visionary linkage of domestic economic recovery, military
preparedness, and worldwide peace had worked with a stunning swiftness
that literally no one but the former Hollywood actor had ever visualized.

The greatness of Ronald Reagan was his optimistic vision. His
unequivocal belief in freedom and democracy, in America as a city on the
hill, never faltered. His free-market prescription for economic growth
relied on the creativity of ordinary people working in free enterprise
rather than under government planning. He believed in entrepreneurship,
not welfarism. He understood how to use military power. And his
optimistic faith in America gave a moribund country a new life.



The latter had to deal with the total mess Gray Davis left Califonya.

[Ramon F. Herrera]

(a) Limbaugh, Hannity, Bachmann, Beck, etc. are leaders ACKNOWLEDGED
by all. Their JOB description is to mold public opinion. They have
assistants, writers, scripts, etc. They work CLOSELY with one
political party. Some get CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS for spreading hatred
(Bachmann, against Muslims). We MUST hold them to a HIGHER standard of
responsibility and CIVIL discourse.

(b) Contrast the above with Ellen Barkin. For all we know she was
drunk, or not getting any (*)

-Ramon

(*) Good film roles, that is!

[George Kerby]

On 8/30/12 11:59 AM, in article k1o65o$f7g$8...@dont-email.me, "skink on sink"

> Jan¬ uary 1981, with his extraordinarily strong character and deep and

> abiding faith in God, Reagan acted relentlessly to revive the nation.
>
> More than any modern president, Reagan understood the link between
> economic growth at home and American strength overseas. It was the

> Gipperąs most brilliant insight. He acted swiftly to show our enemies

> that we would produce the necessary economic resources to do whatever it
> would take, for however long was necessary, to triumph over the
> Communist menace.
>
> Immediately upon assuming office, he reversed the economic policy of the
> decline years. He brought down marginal tax rates, restoring the
> incentives necessary for economic growth. He gave Federal Reserve
> chairman Paul Volcker the strong ground to stand on, allowing him to
> harden the value of the dollar and slay inflation.
>
> At bottom, what became known as Reaganomics was a new pro-growth policy
> mix of tax incentives at the margin and stable money. But there was
> more. The Californian launched a massive military buildup totaling about
> $1.5 trillion. He deregulated oil prices, proving the conventional
> wisdom wrong as energy became much cheaper. He launched U.S.-Canadian
> free trade. He was unyielding in his opposition to the air-traffic

> controllersą strike, firing thousands of these government workers and

> ending the anti-growth union stranglehold on private industry. He
> created individual retirement accounts and 401(k)s, giving birth to the
> investor class. He also slashed social spending by reducing domestic
> program levels (excluding Social Security and health care) by nearly $50
> billion in 1981. That amount would come to about $90 billion today.
>

> By 1986, Reaganąs tax-reform plan left two marginal rates of 28 percent
> and 15 percent, a long stoneąs throw from the 70 percent top rate he had

> inherited. His plan also cut about 2,000 pages from the tax code.
>
> Ideas matter. Results quickly followed for Reagan. Between 1982 and
> 1989, the economy grew, adjusting for inflation, by 35 percent: more
> than 4.5 percent per year. As growth was restored, tax revenues came
> flowing in. Income-tax revenues grew by 50 percent during this period
> even as tax rates dropped. By 1986, the inflation rate had fallen to 1
> percent. By the end of his term, unemployment had dropped to 5.5
> percent. Interest rates had plunged. The stock market had soared.
>
> From July 1982 through the end of 1988, the S&P 500 averaged a near 21
> percent annual gain. Brand-new industries arose in computing, software,

> communications, and the Internet ‹ original endeavors that completely

> streamlined and transformed the American economy for the decades to
> come. In effect, Reaganomics launched a 20-year boom, the longest
> prosperity period in the 20th century.
>
> Reagan critics to this day continue to harp on deficits and debt, rather
> than the growth miracle produced by Reaganomics. But they are factually
> wrong. Reagan inherited a budget gap of roughly 2.5 percent of the
> economy. By the end of his two terms, he left it exactly where he found
> it. In between, he restored our economic health and revitalized our
> standing around the world.
>
> By the time of his summit meetings with Soviet chairman Gorbachev,
> Reagan was able to say calmly and diplomatically that the U.S. could
> produce the goods and the Soviets could not. In the next few years, the
> Berlin Wall came down and the Soviet Union collapsed.
>

> Reaganąs visionary linkage of domestic economic recovery, military

> preparedness, and worldwide peace had worked with a stunning swiftness
> that literally no one but the former Hollywood actor had ever visualized.
>
> The greatness of Ronald Reagan was his optimistic vision. His
> unequivocal belief in freedom and democracy, in America as a city on the
> hill, never faltered. His free-market prescription for economic growth
> relied on the creativity of ordinary people working in free enterprise
> rather than under government planning. He believed in entrepreneurship,
> not welfarism. He understood how to use military power. And his
> optimistic faith in America gave a moribund country a new life.
>
>
>
> The latter had to deal with the total mess Gray Davis left Califonya.

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't
pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for,
protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend
our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it
was once like in the United States where men were free."

--Ronald Reagan

[skink on sink]

On 8/30/2012 11:09 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> Limbaugh, Hannity, Bachmann, Beck, etc. are

Your superiors in every measurable way, you skanky venezuelan toad.

[skink on sink]

>> Jan� uary 1981, with his extraordinarily strong character and deep and

>> abiding faith in God, Reagan acted relentlessly to revive the nation.
>>
>> More than any modern president, Reagan understood the link between
>> economic growth at home and American strength overseas. It was the

>> Gipper�s most brilliant insight. He acted swiftly to show our enemies

>> that we would produce the necessary economic resources to do whatever it
>> would take, for however long was necessary, to triumph over the
>> Communist menace.
>>
>> Immediately upon assuming office, he reversed the economic policy of the
>> decline years. He brought down marginal tax rates, restoring the
>> incentives necessary for economic growth. He gave Federal Reserve
>> chairman Paul Volcker the strong ground to stand on, allowing him to
>> harden the value of the dollar and slay inflation.
>>
>> At bottom, what became known as Reaganomics was a new pro-growth policy
>> mix of tax incentives at the margin and stable money. But there was
>> more. The Californian launched a massive military buildup totaling about
>> $1.5 trillion. He deregulated oil prices, proving the conventional
>> wisdom wrong as energy became much cheaper. He launched U.S.-Canadian
>> free trade. He was unyielding in his opposition to the air-traffic

>> controllers� strike, firing thousands of these government workers and

>> ending the anti-growth union stranglehold on private industry. He
>> created individual retirement accounts and 401(k)s, giving birth to the
>> investor class. He also slashed social spending by reducing domestic
>> program levels (excluding Social Security and health care) by nearly $50
>> billion in 1981. That amount would come to about $90 billion today.
>>

>> By 1986, Reagan�s tax-reform plan left two marginal rates of 28 percent
>> and 15 percent, a long stone�s throw from the 70 percent top rate he had

>> inherited. His plan also cut about 2,000 pages from the tax code.
>>
>> Ideas matter. Results quickly followed for Reagan. Between 1982 and
>> 1989, the economy grew, adjusting for inflation, by 35 percent: more
>> than 4.5 percent per year. As growth was restored, tax revenues came
>> flowing in. Income-tax revenues grew by 50 percent during this period
>> even as tax rates dropped. By 1986, the inflation rate had fallen to 1
>> percent. By the end of his term, unemployment had dropped to 5.5
>> percent. Interest rates had plunged. The stock market had soared.
>>
>> From July 1982 through the end of 1988, the S&P 500 averaged a near 21
>> percent annual gain. Brand-new industries arose in computing, software,

>> communications, and the Internet � original endeavors that completely

>> streamlined and transformed the American economy for the decades to
>> come. In effect, Reaganomics launched a 20-year boom, the longest
>> prosperity period in the 20th century.
>>
>> Reagan critics to this day continue to harp on deficits and debt, rather
>> than the growth miracle produced by Reaganomics. But they are factually
>> wrong. Reagan inherited a budget gap of roughly 2.5 percent of the
>> economy. By the end of his two terms, he left it exactly where he found
>> it. In between, he restored our economic health and revitalized our
>> standing around the world.
>>
>> By the time of his summit meetings with Soviet chairman Gorbachev,
>> Reagan was able to say calmly and diplomatically that the U.S. could
>> produce the goods and the Soviets could not. In the next few years, the
>> Berlin Wall came down and the Soviet Union collapsed.
>>

>> Reagan�s visionary linkage of domestic economic recovery, military

>> preparedness, and worldwide peace had worked with a stunning swiftness
>> that literally no one but the former Hollywood actor had ever visualized.
>>
>> The greatness of Ronald Reagan was his optimistic vision. His
>> unequivocal belief in freedom and democracy, in America as a city on the
>> hill, never faltered. His free-market prescription for economic growth
>> relied on the creativity of ordinary people working in free enterprise
>> rather than under government planning. He believed in entrepreneurship,
>> not welfarism. He understood how to use military power. And his
>> optimistic faith in America gave a moribund country a new life.
>>
>>
>>
>> The latter had to deal with the total mess Gray Davis left Califonya.
>
>
> "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't
> pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for,
> protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend
> our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it
> was once like in the United States where men were free."
>
> --Ronald Reagan
>

bring it!

[jane]

On Aug 30, 1:09 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 10:50 am, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 28, 11:24 am, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 28, 10:14 am, Billary <billaryclinton2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >  > That makes me clearly superior to you.
>
> > > Must be in ground elevation, since here in Houston it is rather flat
> > > and low.
>
> > > -Ramon
>
> > I think it is interesting that any word out of the mouth of Limbaugh,
> > Hannity or any right winger is "hate speech" but they can not  find it
> > in themselves condemn a liberal who says, "“C’mon #Isaac! Wash every
> > pro-life, anti-education, anti-woman, xenophobic, gay-bashing, racist
> > SOB right into the ocean! #RNC ”
>
> (a) Limbaugh, Hannity, Bachmann, Beck, etc. are leaders ACKNOWLEDGED
> by all. Their JOB description is to mold public opinion. They have

Wrong. Their job is to keep an audience entertained in between
commercials. Neil Boortz is the only one who openly admits it.

One (maybe more) of the stations that carries Boortz is owned by a
liberal who recognizes that the purpose of his radio station is to
generate revenue.

[Mike Painter]

On 8/30/2012 11:33 AM, jane wrote:
>> >(a) Limbaugh, Hannity, Bachmann, Beck, etc. are leaders ACKNOWLEDGED
>> >by all. Their JOB description is to mold public opinion. They have
>
> Wrong. Their job is to keep an audience entertained in between
> commercials. Neil Boortz is the only one who openly admits it.
>
> One (maybe more) of the stations that carries Boortz is owned by a
> liberal who recognizes that the purpose of his radio station is to
> generate revenue.
>
>

True. They do not have news shows. During the brief time Limbaugh was on
TV, those who could read, would have seen that his was an entertainment
show.

I think, therefore I snipped Limbaugh.

[Al]

In article
<64274d42-3527-4741...@d6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

> On Aug 28, 10:50 am, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 28, 11:24 am, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Aug 28, 10:14 am, Billary <billaryclinton2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  > That makes me clearly superior to you.
> >
> > > Must be in ground elevation, since here in Houston it is rather flat
> > > and low.
> >
> > > -Ramon
> >
>
> > I think it is interesting that any word out of the mouth of Limbaugh,
> > Hannity or any right winger is "hate speech" but they can not  find it
> > in themselves condemn a liberal who says, "³C¹mon #Isaac! Wash every
> > pro-life, anti-education, anti-woman, xenophobic, gay-bashing, racist
> > SOB right into the ocean! #RNC ²
>
> (a) Limbaugh, Hannity, Bachmann, Beck, etc. are leaders ACKNOWLEDGED
> by all.

And, um, none of the conservatives cited employ eliminationist rhetoric.

> Their JOB description is to mold public opinion. They have
> assistants, writers, scripts, etc. They work CLOSELY with one
> political party.

Unlike he liberal commentators like Ed Schultz, Randy Roads, Mike Moore, and
the late great Olbermann...

> Some get CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS for spreading hatred
> (Bachmann, against Muslims).

So does Obama.
=

> We MUST hold them to a HIGHER standard of
> responsibility and CIVIL discourse.

Oh, they are. No one gives a rat's ass what the people I cited have to say,
but leftists do listen to Limbaugh - not to educate themselves, but to find
something to bring him down. Which hey do very year or so LOL.

=

>
> (b) Contrast the above with Ellen Barkin. For all we know she was
> drunk, or not getting any (*)

And that NBC producer that got canned for the remark about black people
drowning, he has no effect on what the public sees and hears, right?