Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Homeless Are Funny

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Onion

unread,
Apr 7, 2013, 3:56:00 PM4/7/13
to
On Apr 7, 4:17 am, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:53:12 -0700, Devils Advocaat wrote:
> >> Yawn. It's SO important that everyone have what YOU call a "home"!
> >> A house owned by a bank, yeah, that's the ticket. "HOME" fer sure.
> >> I don't even pity you. You are the enemy of all free humans everywhere.
>
> > You ought to read up on the legal definition of the word homeless.
>
> You need to actually talk to a few real bums and get out of your
> imaginary world.

I did not know conservatives were such heartless. But again I also
hate
the progressistes. Dear Lord where is SAFETY?
-------
Devillepin, L'Afrique n'est pas un vil pain et elle n'a pas de maiters
non plus
quelque soit ce que te feront croire Dramane Fujimory Ouattara et sa
clique

benj

unread,
Apr 7, 2013, 11:22:00 PM4/7/13
to
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:56:00 -0700, Onion wrote:

> On Apr 7, 4:17 am, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:53:12 -0700, Devils Advocaat wrote:

>> > You ought to read up on the legal definition of the word homeless.

>> You need to actually talk to a few real bums and get out of your
>> imaginary world.
>
> I did not know conservatives were such heartless. But again I also hate
> the progressistes. Dear Lord where is SAFETY?

Sorry Bunky, but the bad news is you are already IN the promised land! No
place left to go. It's "fix it or forget it" time!

benj

unread,
Apr 7, 2013, 11:27:12 PM4/7/13
to
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:56:00 -0700, Onion wrote:

> I did not know conservatives were such heartless. But again I also hate
> the progressistes. Dear Lord where is SAFETY?

Heartless my ass. Fake bleeding heart shit isn't "caring" it's simply
exploitation disguised as charity.

You know Nixon (of all people) had a plan to totally eliminate poverty in
America FOREVER without costing taxpayers a dime. Naturally ALL
politicians and those in power threw a fit against it.
Conservatives,liberals, republicans, democrats, rightists, progressistes,
ALL OF THEM! You never saw such an effort to retain poverty and the poor
in your life. You can guess why that was.



Onion

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 11:32:09 AM4/8/13
to
On Apr 7, 11:27 pm, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:56:00 -0700, Onion wrote:
> > I did not know conservatives were such heartless. But again I also hate
> > the progressistes. Dear Lord where is SAFETY?
>
> Heartless my ass. Fake bleeding heart shit isn't "caring" it's simply
> exploitation disguised as charity.

Conservatives don't even fake the fake... WHAT TYPE OF YOU HUMAN
are you?
There is no way you can eliminate poverty as it is written in the Acts
of the Messiah," The poor you will laways have among you but..."
In others words, any plan to eliminate poverty will end up creating
poverty. By the way do you think that poverty is just material?

Dreamer In Colore

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:57:20 PM4/8/13
to
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:32:09 -0700 (PDT), Onion
<kolw...@astromail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 7, 11:27�pm, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:56:00 -0700, Onion wrote:
>> > I did not know conservatives were such heartless. But again I also hate
>> > the progressistes. Dear Lord where is SAFETY?
>>
>> Heartless my ass. Fake bleeding heart shit isn't "caring" it's simply
>> exploitation disguised as charity.
>
>Conservatives don't even fake the fake... WHAT TYPE OF YOU HUMAN
>are you?
>There is no way you can eliminate poverty as it is written in the Acts
>of the Messiah," The poor you will laways have among you but..."
>In others words, any plan to eliminate poverty will end up creating
>poverty. By the way do you think that poverty is just material?
>
>

I never thought I'd say this, but Onion... you're absolutely right.

There IS no way you can eliminate poverty as it is written in the Acts
of the Messiah.

However, you can certainly eliminate poverty with things outside
scripture. Job training, education, you know, the things that can
actually put food on the table?

When you bring up spiritual poverty, that's entirely different, and to
say that you can fill that up with baseless platitudes is truly awful.

I don't see scripture providing medicine, and improved agricultural
techniques to feed millions, and the internet for you to spew your
vile filth... no, I see science doing that, and more, and do you know
why?

Because it works.

Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

Onion

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 1:28:33 PM4/8/13
to
On Apr 8, 12:57 pm, Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:32:09 -0700 (PDT), Onion
>
>
>
>
>
> <kolwe...@astromail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 7, 11:27 pm, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:56:00 -0700, Onion wrote:
> >> > I did not know conservatives were such heartless. But again I also hate
> >> > the progressistes. Dear Lord where is SAFETY?
>
> >> Heartless my ass. Fake bleeding heart shit isn't "caring" it's simply
> >> exploitation disguised as charity.
>
> >Conservatives don't even fake the fake... WHAT TYPE OF YOU HUMAN
> >are you?
> >There is no way you can eliminate poverty as it is written in the Acts
> >of the Messiah," The poor you will laways have among you but..."
> >In others words, any plan to eliminate poverty will end up creating
> >poverty. By the way do you think that poverty is just material?
>
> I never thought I'd say this, but Onion... you're absolutely right.
>
> There IS no way you can eliminate poverty as it is written in the Acts
> of the Messiah.
>
> However, you can certainly eliminate poverty with things outside
> scripture. Job training, education, you know, the things that can
> actually put food on the table?


Who told you that Job training, education are outside
the SCRIPTURES?
Have you been reading Jefferson's Bible lately? Get you a copy
of the real one CANONIZED century before Jefferson
the son of the devil

>
> When you bring up spiritual poverty, that's entirely different, and to
> say that you can fill that up with baseless platitudes is truly awful.
>
> I don't see scripture providing medicine, and improved agricultural
> techniques to feed millions, and the internet for you to spew your
> vile filth... no, I see science doing that, and more, and do you know
> why?
>
> Because it works.

So you think that Science give you the rights to be
crual to the less fortunate?

>
> Cheers,
> Dreamer
> AA 2306- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dreamer In Colore

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:18:46 PM4/8/13
to
The scriptures don't teach people how to read, or to build bridges, or
weld metal, or fix plumbing, or how to build a business plan, or any
of a million other things required to put food on the table, you big
maroon.

The scriptures foist contradictory (at best) and murderous (at worst)
messages on lots and lots of people.

I've read enough of the bible to make me put it down either laughing
or crying.

You, on the other hand, selectively pick out things that support your
thesis.

>>
>> When you bring up spiritual poverty, that's entirely different, and to
>> say that you can fill that up with baseless platitudes is truly awful.
>>
>> I don't see scripture providing medicine, and improved agricultural
>> techniques to feed millions, and the internet for you to spew your
>> vile filth... no, I see science doing that, and more, and do you know
>> why?
>>
>> Because it works.
>
>So you think that Science give you the rights to be
>crual to the less fortunate?
>

What are you talking about? I'm only cruel to people who continue to
cling to outdated and outmoded beliefs in the hopes that they will
somehow buy their way into a place that nobody has conclusively
demonstrated exists.

What exactly have you done for the less fortunate, my fine member of
the lily family? Preached at them? Proselytized? Shook your fist with
rage? How exactly did this make them more fortunate?

Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

Onion

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:47:21 PM4/8/13
to
On Apr 8, 4:18 pm, Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Yet people of the Scriptures have been reading, writing
magnificent Hymns, building bridges, welding metal
or fix plumbing. Some of them have been wealthy busimen
and women. Were you under the impression that reading
and bridges building started 50 years ago?


> The scriptures foist contradictory (at best) and murderous (at worst)
> messages on lots and lots of people.
>
> I've read enough of the bible to make me put it down either laughing
> or crying.
>
> You, on the other hand, selectively pick out things that support your
> thesis.
>
>
>
> >> When you bring up spiritual poverty, that's entirely different, and to
> >> say that you can fill that up with baseless platitudes is truly awful.
>
> >> I don't see scripture providing medicine, and improved agricultural
> >> techniques to feed millions, and the internet for you to spew your
> >> vile filth... no, I see science doing that, and more, and do you know
> >> why?
>
> >> Because it works.
>
> >So you think that Science give you the rights to be
> >crual to the less fortunate?
>
> What are you talking about? I'm only cruel to people who continue to
> cling to outdated and outmoded beliefs in the hopes that they will
> somehow buy their way into a place that nobody has conclusively
> demonstrated exists.

And that is your opinion and everybody has one. Why do you
think that your opinion is more important that of the Bible?

Olrik

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 12:16:50 AM4/9/13
to
Le 2013-04-08 16:47, Onion a �crit :
Same with people who never heard of your �scriptures�.

> Were you under the impression that reading
> and bridges building started 50 years ago?

No, since that started thousands of years before your so-called
�scriptures� even existed.

You really should get an education.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Onion

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 10:23:47 AM4/9/13
to
On Apr 9, 12:16 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
And since by education you mean EVOLUTION which is
nothing but a fairy tale, then I shall stick to the EVANGELION,
the best education ever

Olrik

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 12:10:02 AM4/10/13
to
Le 2013-04-09 10:23, Onion a �crit :
> On Apr 9, 12:16 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Le 2013-04-08 16:47, Onion a �crit :
You should be considered a warning, not an example.

You're a shitty person, and you wear your religion like a badge of
honour, while you should normally despise yourself if indeed you
identify yourself with the Jesus guy.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 12:57:17 AM4/10/13
to
In article
<428ea0cb-65dd-49ad...@r6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Science works...bitches!

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

benj

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 3:58:06 AM4/10/13
to
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:57:17 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> Onion <kolw...@astromail.com> wrote:

>> And since by education you mean EVOLUTION which is nothing but a fairy
>> tale, then I shall stick to the EVANGELION,
>> the best education ever

> Science works...bitches!

You mean, science works when it works and when it fails to work everyone
simply asserts that the failing data simply does not exist. Which of
course is not science at all, but politics.


Dreamer In Colore

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 11:28:36 AM4/10/13
to
That's not how science works. Science works by making claims, and then
trying to prove them, and if the proofs don't work... you say "Whoa,
that didn't work at all... let's try something different."

In contrast, religions say "Goddidit" and that's the end of the
discussion. What a truly horrible way to shut down inquiry...

Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

Mahipal

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 12:17:16 PM4/10/13
to
On Apr 10, 11:28 am, Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Science and Religions both -- independently or in conspiracy or even
otherwise -- manufacture the Homeless for the consequential laughs.

>
> Cheers,
> Dreamer
> AA 2306

"Dreamer... nothing but a Dreamer..." Supertramp song.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9974373/Welfare-reform-53-a-week...-You-do-the-maths.html

"Welfare reform: £53 a week... You do the maths"

"Gas £5, Water £3, Electricity £8, Food £15, Travel £13, Debt £4,
Phone £5, Social life £0. Iain Duncan Smith claims that he could live
on £53 a week. But for many people it is the miserable reality" and
The Telegraph left out £5 per pound of dry cleaning at the Chinese
Laundromat.

What gets me is how wealthy politicians, at £50,000 per plate dinners,
or is $50K on this side of the pond, have such intimate knowledge of
if the average person has money in his/her pocket for a hot dog when
walking by a street corner vendor?! How, and if there's time, why, do
politicians know to do that? Are coins transmitting signals back home
to the Mother Fed?

Ftr, the lady in the original article, is likely in a jail cell now
where the politicians are gladly spending about $40,000 per year per
her to house her there. Society, ItIs2Laugh else you'd die realizing
the actual tragedy. You would.

-- Mahipal "Dreams2cMe" ...

Dreamer In Colore

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 12:42:55 PM4/10/13
to
Nobody can argue that politicians aren't self-serving. That wasn't the
point of my post. My point was about science versus religion... what
part of that didn't you understand?

Homeless people AREN'T funny. The circumstances that lead to
homelessness AREN'T funny. But religion puts a band-aid on the
problem, while education can help to find a way out. Politics is
another animal entirely.

None of the cross-posted newsgroups have anything to do with politics,
and I'm reading this in alt.atheism, so I fail to see where we are at
loggerheads.

Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

Mahipal

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 1:35:28 PM4/10/13
to
On Apr 10, 12:42 pm, Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9974373/Welfare-reform-53-a-...
>
> >"Welfare reform: £53 a week... You do the maths"
>
> >"Gas £5, Water £3, Electricity £8, Food £15, Travel £13, Debt £4,
> >Phone £5, Social life £0. Iain Duncan Smith claims that he could live
> >on £53 a week. But for many people it is the miserable reality" and
> >The Telegraph left out £5 per pound of dry cleaning at the Chinese
> >Laundromat.
>
> >What gets me is how wealthy politicians, at £50,000 per plate dinners,
> >or is $50K on this side of the pond, have such intimate knowledge of
> >if the average person has money in his/her pocket for a hot dog when
> >walking by a street corner vendor?! How, and if there's time, why, do
> >politicians know to do that? Are coins transmitting signals back home
> >to the Mother Fed?
>
> >Ftr, the lady in the original article, is likely in a jail cell now
> >where the politicians are gladly spending about $40,000 per year per
> >her to house her there. Society, ItIs2Laugh else you'd die realizing
> >the actual tragedy. You would.
>
> >-- Mahipal "Dreams2cMe" ...
>
> Nobody can argue that politicians aren't self-serving. That wasn't the
> point of my post. My point was about science versus religion... what
> part of that didn't you understand?

Which part about science versus religion that I did not understand?
All of it! Please, per your disposition and convenience, explain it to
me. I like to read. Or, sorry to ask, send me the links! If the
explanations exist only in paperbacks, I'll suffer the indignity of
walking into my nearest state sponsored... err... dare I say it...
Library. I would walk into one, if it were worth the trip.

> Homeless people AREN'T funny. The circumstances that lead to
> homelessness AREN'T funny. But religion puts a band-aid on the
> problem, while education can help to find a way out. Politics is
> another animal entirely.

I come from, and grew up, in India. There the Homeless do not die of
freezing cold like the Journalist did in England. Die they still do.
Kind of a cure, I suppose.

Homeless are indifferent to the root causes of their plight, whether
it be caused by Sciences, Religions, or plotting Politicians. I
suspect they the Homeless just want a solution.

> None of the cross-posted newsgroups have anything to do with politics,
> and I'm reading this in alt.atheism, so I fail to see where we are at
> loggerheads.

We are not at any loggerheads Dreamer. I like your alias, but do know
that I always read aliased posters with a mountain of salt. Discuss
freely anything you wish, to your heart's content. I am not here to
argue or fight. I'm just wasting my free time on Usenet. If I wanted
for substance in News, I'd tune into Fox daily without fail.

> Cheers,
> Dreamer
> AA 2306

-- Mahipal

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/s/supertramp/dreamer_20133860.html

HVAC

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 2:09:06 PM4/10/13
to
Anyone is free to post their data, so it is science NOT politics.
Of course, shit that is put out by such as you who believes in ghosts,
ether and aliens, is generally ignored by men of science.




--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

Onion

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 2:43:43 PM4/10/13
to
On Apr 10, 12:42 pm, Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9974373/Welfare-reform-53-a-...
>
> >"Welfare reform: £53 a week... You do the maths"
>
> >"Gas £5, Water £3, Electricity £8, Food £15, Travel £13, Debt £4,
> >Phone £5, Social life £0. Iain Duncan Smith claims that he could live
> >on £53 a week. But for many people it is the miserable reality" and
> >The Telegraph left out £5 per pound of dry cleaning at the Chinese
> >Laundromat.
>
> >What gets me is how wealthy politicians, at £50,000 per plate dinners,
> >or is $50K on this side of the pond, have such intimate knowledge of
> >if the average person has money in his/her pocket for a hot dog when
> >walking by a street corner vendor?! How, and if there's time, why, do
> >politicians know to do that? Are coins transmitting signals back home
> >to the Mother Fed?
>
> >Ftr, the lady in the original article, is likely in a jail cell now
> >where the politicians are gladly spending about $40,000 per year per
> >her to house her there. Society, ItIs2Laugh else you'd die realizing
> >the actual tragedy. You would.
>
> >-- Mahipal "Dreams2cMe" ...
>
> Nobody can argue that politicians aren't self-serving. That wasn't the
> point of my post. My point was about science versus religion... what
> part of that didn't you understand?
>
> Homeless people AREN'T funny. The circumstances that lead to
> homelessness AREN'T funny. But religion puts a band-aid on the


Only the devils can pit Science versus religion so as to prey on
the weak and wick but everyone knows that science has been
around for a long time in the service of the EVANGELION.
In fact it is explained that God puts the evangelion forward as a ploy
for mankind to expand his brain and get a rational mind.
By calling the Gentiles from idol worship to monotheim, God
was plotting so that they reach a state of a rational mind.
Even the apparent contradictions in the Acts of the Messiah aka
Gospels were in the service of that goal. And the best minds in the
Scientific world never had any ego against God. From the worship
of Al Houza and Al manath, the arabians ancestral idols
the Ismaelites were on the front of scientific achievements. And what
was impossible for them in the time of ignorance became possibble
with the monotheism.
GIVE CREDITS WHERE CREDITS ARE DUE. Our Mighty God
is the father of all science. YET MORTALS TRY TO GET CREDITS
FOR HIS ACHIEVMENTS. If this is not devilish, what is it?
--------
Devillepin, L'Afrique n'est pas un vil pain et elle n'a pas de maitre
non plus quelque soit ce que te feront croire Dramane Fujimory
Ouattara et sa clique


benj

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 8:01:26 PM4/10/13
to
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:09:06 -0400, HVAC wrote:

> On 4/10/2013 3:58 AM, benj wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:57:17 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>> Onion <kolw...@astromail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> And since by education you mean EVOLUTION which is nothing but a
>>>> fairy tale, then I shall stick to the EVANGELION,
>>>> the best education ever
>>
>>> Science works...bitches!
>>
>> You mean, science works when it works and when it fails to work
>> everyone simply asserts that the failing data simply does not exist.
>> Which of course is not science at all, but politics.
>
>
> Anyone is free to post their data, so it is science NOT politics.
> Of course, shit that is put out by such as you who believes in ghosts,
> ether and aliens, is generally ignored by men of science.

As usual HVAC you are lying again. You have NO evidence or statements
from me as to what I "believe" in. As I have pointed out here many times,
belief is of no consequence to men of science such as myself. It only
matters to men of faith, such as you. And obviously you have PLENTY of
faith in fairy tales like cosmology, Big Bang, "climate science", Atheist
evolution and all that establishment political blather you promote.




Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 8:07:07 PM4/10/13
to
In article
<5d933ff0-0d90-4d58...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
What the hell is "the EVANGELION"?

Jeff-Relf.Me

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 8:08:57 PM4/10/13
to
 
Those who say shit like, "gravity is aether flowing into mass"
are saying things that have absolutely NO bases in reality.
Further, they have no way of knowing if such were true or not.

They're not talking science, not in the least.
There's nothing to measure, no model at all, no precision.

As HVAC notes, these are the same people who MUST trick themselves
into believing they'll live forever, ever more glorious.

They need that high, just like a junkie needs a fix.

Brad Guth

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 8:18:51 PM4/10/13
to
On Apr 10, 5:08 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>   Those who say shit like, "gravity is aether flowing into mass" are saying things that have absolutely NO bases in reality. Further, they have no way of knowing if such were true or not. They're not talking science, not in the least. There's nothing to measure, no model at all, no precision. As HVAC notes, these are the same people who MUST trick themselves into believing they'll live forever, ever more glorious. They need that high, just like a junkie needs a fix.

And yet you have not a clue where matter originally came from, or what
makes gravity work.

Onion

unread,
Apr 11, 2013, 11:47:09 AM4/11/13
to
On Apr 10, 8:07 pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <5d933ff0-0d90-4d58-9c66-dff1fd0b3...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
The Injil in Arabic, Evangel or evangelion in its Greek
transliteration.
And the Gospel is DIVINE and DEMOCRACY is satanic

HVAC

unread,
Apr 11, 2013, 12:10:54 PM4/11/13
to
On 4/10/2013 8:01 PM, benj wrote:
>
>> Anyone is free to post their data, so it is science NOT politics.
>> Of course, shit that is put out by such as you who believes in ghosts,
>> ether and aliens, is generally ignored by men of science.
>
> As usual HVAC you are lying again. You have NO evidence or statements
> from me as to what I "believe" in. As I have pointed out here many times,
> belief is of no consequence to men of science such as myself. It only
> matters to men of faith, such as you. And obviously you have PLENTY of
> faith in fairy tales like cosmology, Big Bang, "climate science", Atheist
> evolution and all that establishment political blather you promote.


LOL @ 'Atheist' evolution!

The fact is, BJ, that as soon as you mention your belief in god, you
have exposed yourself as an idiot. Your belief in 'non-physical'
phenomenon is just another example of your puny mind at work on problems
that your aren't equipped to handle.

Brad Guth

unread,
Apr 11, 2013, 12:20:54 PM4/11/13
to
If "DEMOCRACY is satanic", then what is a ZNR/GOP Republican and their
NWO interpreted as?

benj

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 9:50:58 PM4/12/13
to
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:10:54 -0400, HVAC wrote:

> LOL @ 'Atheist' evolution!
>
> The fact is, BJ, that as soon as you mention your belief in god, you
> have exposed yourself as an idiot. Your belief in 'non-physical'
> phenomenon is just another example of your puny mind at work on problems
> that your aren't equipped to handle.

Your idiot bluster and lies describing what other people "believe" as
well as the fairy tales you assert they SHOULD believe only shows your
total lack of credibility. Why would anyone believe such internet
claptrap presented without any proof beyond your own egotistical rants?

Do you understand how Stooopid a person would have to be to even respond
to your idiot blather? uh,oh!

Just word it this way, Harlow: "HVAC is awl that matters now!"

0 new messages