Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Da Vinci Code Painting is a Forgery

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Paulus Ben Jacob

unread,
May 14, 2006, 8:17:39 PM5/14/06
to
The Da Vinci Code book and movie are a direct attack on Our Lord Jesus
The Christ. These enemies of the Christian faith use Leonardo Da
Vinci's painting The Last Supper as proof that Jesus was not God, that
he married Mary Magdalene, and had a child with her. The Code liars
point to the painting and tell you: look, that's not a man sitting on
Christ's right, that's a woman. It's not John the beloved disciple,
it's Mary Magdalene. And you look and have to agree that the figure
on Christ's right is a woman, not a man, and you become helpless and
defenseless.

Yes, that's a woman, but it's not a woman painted by Leonardo Da
Vinci. It's a forgery -- a repainting of The Last Supper. The
painting on the wall of the dining hall of Santa Maria delle Grazie in
Milan, Italy is no longer the work of Leonardo Da Vinci, but the work
of Pinin Brambilla Barsilon, an art restorer who took 20 years to
completely repaint this masterpiece while pretending to restore it.
She changed the face of Jesus, removing His beard, and changed the
figure of John to a woman. "It is ruined," said Carlo Bertelli who,
as director of the Istituto Centrale del Restauro, commissioned its
20-year restoration, completed in 1999.

I have created a one-page Acrobat document showing the original
painting and the current changes and also a close up of the original
John and his current feminine transformation. Please download it from
the address below and then email it to as many people as you can.
Print it and make copies and give it to your co-workers, friends and
neighbors -- especially to those who already swallowed the Code lies.

Please don't see the Da Vinci Code movie, and convince others not to
see it. It is really an insult to anyone's intelligence because it is
a smelly heap of lies that your enemies expect you to take and like
just because it is dished out by Hollywood. Do not support the Da
Vinci Code conspirators -- not just because they're enemies of your
faith, but also because they're shameless liars.

Please download the Acrobat document here:
http://www.mytempdir.com/666565.

For a more extensive expose of the Da Vinci Code conspiracy and the
people behind it, send an email to jaco...@sbcglobal.net and enter
'code conspiracy' in the subject area.

Chuck

unread,
May 15, 2006, 1:27:01 AM5/15/06
to
What is it about the word NOVEL that people don't get?

"Paulus Ben Jacob" <jaco...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:v3if62heldlcec03f...@4ax.com...

Paulus Ben Jacob

unread,
May 15, 2006, 11:36:11 PM5/15/06
to
Namely this:
On page one of the Code Novel, Dan Brown says this: "FACT: All of the
art, architecture, secret rituals, secret societies ARE HISTORICAL
FACT." In another word, yeah, it's fiction but everything in it is
fact. The fact that the book and movie are malicious attacks on the
Christian faith is shown in the slogan of the movie: SEEK THE TRUTH.
The fiction part disarms people like you, and enables the attackers to
do damage to others as you stand by shaking your head and wondering
why people don't get it.

On Mon, 15 May 2006 05:27:01 GMT, "Chuck" <%name%@newleaf-dist.com>
wrote:

Chuck

unread,
May 16, 2006, 3:09:22 AM5/16/06
to
And if you look a few pages before that, it says the following:
"This book is a work of FICTION."
 
The PDF file that you apparently wrote and link to has the following lines:
 
 1) "When the 20-year restoration of Leonardo Da Vinci's Last Supper was compeleted in 1999." - (1st paragraph)
 2) "According to Carlo Bertelli who commissioned its 20-year restoration,...."  - (1st paragraph)
 3) "Notice also the sinister expression added to Saint Peter's face to fit with the Da Vinci Code fiction" - (The caption under the first set of paintings)
 
Now what I find interesting with it is due to the fact that the book wasn't published until 2003. Are you saying that this book was really written prior to 1979 when the painting was yet to be "restored"?
 
You do also realize that the book is a sequel?
 
 
 
"Paulus Ben Jacob" <jaco...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message ...
0 new messages