He Makes Sense
Tohu.Bohu
or reminder, is a Christian, He that believes
that Jesus is the Christ.
Is a Trinitarian he that believes in him as
the Son of God.
And to believe in him as the Son of God,
you must have disregarded Moses Law.
This is why Islam and the Trinitarian Catholicism
are at odd as were Paul and the pharisees who believed
Muslims like their predecessors, the Hebrew
Christians, are Christians even though NOT
Trinitarian.
TO HELL WITH THE BIBLE THUMPERS
Olrik
> According to the author of the other Qur'an
> or reminder
That sentence does not make sense.
, is a Christian, He that believes
> that Jesus is the Christ.
> Is a Trinitarian he that believes in him as
> the Son of God.
> And to believe in him as the Son of God,
> you must have disregarded Moses Law.
> This is why Islam and the Trinitarian Catholicism
> are at odd as were Paul and the pharisees who believed
> Muslims like their predecessors, the Hebrew
> Christians, are Christians even though NOT
> Trinitarian.
> TO HELL WITH THE BIBLE THUMPERS
The hell with you then.
RVG
> Paul and the pharisees who believed
> Muslims like their predecessors,
You have some chronolgy issues...
--
Jazz up your life!
Jazzez-vous la vie!
http://rvgmusic.bandcamp.com/
http://www.jamendo.com/fr/user/RVG95
"La premi�re arme de la R�sistance c'est l'information." Lucie Aubrac
Olrik
> Tohu.Bohu a �crit :
>> Paul and the pharisees who believed
>> Muslims like their predecessors,
>
> You have some chronolgy issues...
>
He has a laundry list of issues...
Olrik
P.S.: Je lis f.s.religion quelquefois et j'aime bien ce que vous �crivez.
panam...@hotmail.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorpromazine
HTH.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
The Whistleblower
Listen up atheists, Christian has nothing to do with
Son of God.
And trust me Jesus first disciples in Israel
did not believe in him as the Son of God, but as
Christ hence the word CHRISTIAN.
Most Jews who believe in him were under Moses
Law and the Law forbid such association.
Now If anyone telles you otherwise, he is a liar
Olrik
We don't care. Go away.
Alan Ford
> Listen up atheists, Christian has nothing to do with
> Son of God.
How do you know? Maybe he has a lot to do with him. Naamsayin?
> And trust me Jesus
OK, my son. I trust you.
first disciples in Israel
> did not believe in him as the Son of God, but as
> Christ hence the word CHRISTIAN.
True, but only after 8:00 AM.
> Most Jews who believe in him were under Moses
I bet they were.
> Law and the Law forbid such association.
> Now If anyone telles you otherwise, he is a liar
But what of the six day saucer?
--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?
The Whistleblower
> Le 2010-02-05 17:04, Tohu.Bohu a écrit :
>
> > According to the author of the other Qur'an
> > or reminder
I know English is not this motherfucker first language.
What I meant is that REMINDER seems to be the
correct title of the book that we know as Qur'an
The Whistleblower
Beat you meat then...
This is no RIDDLE is it loser?
Olrik
>>
>>> According to the author of the other Qur'an
>>> or reminder
>
> I know English is not this motherfucker first language.
You're responding to yourself.
> What I meant is that REMINDER seems to be the
> correct title of the book that we know as Qur'an
No, it's not.
RVG
> P.S.: Je lis f.s.religion quelquefois et j'aime bien ce que vous �crivez.
>
Thanks. I try to bring people at least to have a taste of metaphysical
thought and life even if they're atheists. That's why I've given up the
word "God" from my vocabulary as it has been terribly galvauded by all
sorts of pharisees like the papists, the fundamentalist protestants, the
orthodoxist phyletists of Serbia and Russia and now the so-called
"islamists".
This method is really a coming back to St Paul's teaching and personal
experience, the same that's been transmitted along the chains of holy
Elders in the orthodox church, but also in other traditions like Muslim
sufism (Djelaluddin Rumi is one of my best friends ever), Jewish
hassidism (there's a wonderful account of St Paissi Velitchovsky when he
accidentally met a hassidic rabbi in Ukraine and both blessed each other
upon meeting. Read also Martin Buber) and Hindu advaitism (with luminous
and saintly figures such as Sri Ramana Maharshi and Ma Ananda Moyi in
the XXth century).
Christopher A. Lee
<not....@themoment.org.invalid> wrote:
>Olrik a �crit :
>> P.S.: Je lis f.s.religion quelquefois et j'aime bien ce que vous �crivez.
>>
>
>Thanks. I try to bring people at least to have a taste of metaphysical
>thought and life even if they're atheists.
What an aeeogantly stupid poeve of work.
Metaphysics is an excuse by the deluded that their bullshit has merit.
> That's why I've given up the
>word "God" from my vocabulary as it has been terribly galvauded by all
>sorts of pharisees like the papists, the fundamentalist protestants, the
>orthodoxist phyletists of Serbia and Russia and now the so-called
>"islamists".
>
>This method is really a coming back to St Paul's teaching and personal
Idiot.
>experience, the same that's been transmitted along the chains of holy
>Elders in the orthodox church, but also in other traditions like Muslim
>sufism (Djelaluddin Rumi is one of my best friends ever), Jewish
>hassidism (there's a wonderful account of St Paissi Velitchovsky when he
>accidentally met a hassidic rabbi in Ukraine and both blessed each other
>upon meeting. Read also Martin Buber) and Hindu advaitism (with luminous
>and saintly figures such as Sri Ramana Maharshi and Ma Ananda Moyi in
>the XXth century).
Fuck off and die.
Christopher A. Lee
<ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:14:51 +0100, RVG
><not....@themoment.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Olrik a �crit :
>>> P.S.: Je lis f.s.religion quelquefois et j'aime bien ce que vous �crivez.
>>>
>>
>>Thanks. I try to bring people at least to have a taste of metaphysical
>>thought and life even if they're atheists.
>
>What an aeeogantly stupid poeve of work.
Make that "arrogantly stupid piece of work"
Alan Ford
>> What an aeeogantly stupid poeve of work.
>
> Make that "arrogantly stupid piece of work"
I just assumed you were doing a Sylvester Stallone impression.
The Whistleblower
> Le 2010-02-06 16:51, The Whistleblower a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 6, 12:02 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>> According to the author of the other Qur'an
> >>> or reminder
>
> > I know English is not this motherfucker first language.
>
> You're responding to yourself.
>
> > What I meant is that REMINDER seems to be the
> > correct title of the book that we know as Qur'an
>
> No, it's not.
Now you are arguing with the author If you
ever got his point.
But I know for sure that you have no way to know
since you confessed you never read the book.
SHAME ON YOU HOMO
Christopher A. Lee
>Christopher A. Lee got sick and threw up all over the keyboard:
>
>>> What an aeeogantly stupid poeve of work.
>>
>> Make that "arrogantly stupid piece of work"
>
>
>I just assumed you were doing a Sylvester Stallone impression.
The adjacent key syndrome
Olrik
>>
>>>>> According to the author of the other Qur'an
>>>>> or reminder
>>
>>> I know English is not this motherfucker first language.
>>
>> You're responding to yourself.
>>
>>> What I meant is that REMINDER seems to be the
>>> correct title of the book that we know as Qur'an
>>
>> No, it's not.
>
> Now you are arguing with the author If you
> ever got his point.
> But I know for sure that you have no way to know
> since you confessed you never read the book.
You don't have to read a book to know its title. And you're not
authorized to change its title either.
Olrik
The Whistleblower
Then you associate with a fraudulent claim.
If the author says his book is a reminder of Moses Law
then it is a reminder of Moses. If he refers to Moses Law
as the Qur'an or " what we read ", then you are NOT supposed
to call his instructional "letters", the Qur'an.
If you do, then you are misrepresenting the fact and
playing on the ignorance of the readers.
MISREPRESENTATION IS A DECEPTION
>
> Olrik- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Uncle Vic
wrote:
>>What an aeeogantly stupid poeve of work.
>
> Make that "arrogantly stupid piece of work"
For a moment I thought your keyboard had shrunk.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
"Evidence is proof of itself, that is, sheds its own light. A belief can be
total evidence if one believes it hard enough." - Mark Earnest
The Whistleblower
So explain this then:
"We have given you the 7 oft-repeated verses
and the glorious Qur'an"
So If I wrote you a text instructing you
that I get you a copy of the Qur'an,
do my texts become Qur'an?
Hmmmm... You need a little help in Philosophy
I believe.
"We have given you the 7 oft-repeated verses
and the glorious Qur'an"
The above can't be a part of that quranic verse asshole