Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Question for the Doctrinites.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Christ

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 6:26:31 PM12/27/09
to
What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??

Michael Christ

RWKnapp

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 8:11:18 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 6:26 pm, "Michael Christ" <jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:
> What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>
> Michael Christ

Do do such would be like slapping Jesus across the face, something
that is not too wise to do.

Seon Ferguson

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 8:49:54 PM12/27/09
to

"Michael Christ" <jesus...@father.com> wrote in message
news:H2SZm.65103$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...


> What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>
>
>
>
>
> Michael Christ

I'm curious mr Christ are you actually rejecting original sin? If so maybe
there's hope for you yet!

dolf

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 9:02:10 PM12/27/09
to
Whilst Michael does like to occasionally dress up in his wife's clothes
such freedom he describes as swinging naked from Sydney Harbour bridge
and his pontificating at times is a parody of Cardinal Pell, I'm not
sure that he would advocate Catholic doctrine on original sin.

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 9:09:14 PM12/27/09
to
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:26:31 GMT, "Michael Christ"
<jesus...@father.com> wrote:

>What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??

That's not for you to know.

>Michael Christ

=-=-=
Barry
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Zadok

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 9:35:33 PM12/27/09
to

"RWKnapp" <rwk...@aim.com> wrote in
message -959ca...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

Funny you start your sentence with Do do, another name for bullshit!!

Smile.

Seon Ferguson

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 9:33:24 PM12/27/09
to

"dolf" <dolf...@grapple.id.au> wrote in message
news:CkUZm.65142$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...


> Whilst Michael does like to occasionally dress up in his wife's clothes
> such freedom he describes as swinging naked from Sydney Harbour bridge and
> his pontificating at times is a parody of Cardinal Pell, I'm not sure that
> he would advocate Catholic doctrine on original sin.
>

I almost thought he started to think for himself.

dolf

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 9:43:52 PM12/27/09
to
Whilst Michael does like to occasionally dress up in his wife's clothes
such freedom he describes as swinging naked from Sydney Harbour bridge
and his pontificating at times is a parody of Cardinal Pell, I'm not
sure that he would advocate Catholic doctrine on original sin.

This androgynous dystrophy as mortification of the soul and purging the
body of its passion for fashion rather than in any sense being bad is
what he calls an elevated state of elightenment in the spirit.

RWKnapp

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 11:08:52 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 9:35 pm, "Zadok" <nob...@accesswave.ca> wrote:
> "RWKnapp" <rwkn...@aim.com> wrote in
> message -959caa303...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

> On Dec 27, 6:26 pm, "Michael Christ" <jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:
>
> > What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>
> > Michael Christ
> >Do do such would be like slapping Jesus across the face, something
> >that is not too wise to do.
>
> Funny you start your sentence with Do do, another name for bullshit!!

Well that would insult the bull, then. I suppose anyone that wants to
slap Jesus would be in a big heap of Do-do then doing such could be
the kind of occasional sin, many do. When they use the name of God in
vain. Not so funny, I was in a hurry and missed the "Do do" as I am
sure you knew.

Thank you for bring that out, now my mother would use such terms as
she was raised on the farm and a mess by a bull or donkey etc. is
still a mess. Then that is something that comes natural in most people
others need a laxative. Then I looked up the word in the dictionary
and this is what it said "Obscene words for unacceptable behavior"
which doing "sin" would be. Just I do not like that kind of terms for
Christians to use. S O R R Y!


Have a Nice New Year.

Raymond
>
> Smile.

dolf

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 11:17:10 PM12/27/09
to
I think it was a typo

Do do such ought to read TO DO such

On 28/12/09 3:08 PM, RWKnapp wrote:
> On Dec 27, 9:35 pm, "Zadok"<nob...@accesswave.ca> wrote:
>> "RWKnapp"<rwkn...@aim.com> wrote in
>> message -959caa303...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 27, 6:26 pm, "Michael Christ"<jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>>
>>> Michael Christ

>>> To do such would be like slapping Jesus across the face, something

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 5:17:15 AM12/28/09
to
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:08:52 -0800 (PST), RWKnapp <rwk...@aim.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 27, 9:35�pm, "Zadok" <nob...@accesswave.ca> wrote:
>> "RWKnapp" <rwkn...@aim.com> wrote in
>> message -959caa303...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 27, 6:26 pm, "Michael Christ" <jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:
>>
>> > What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>>
>> > Michael Christ
>> >Do do such would be like slapping Jesus across the face, something
>> >that is not too wise to do.
>>
>> Funny you start your sentence with Do do, another name for bullshit!!
>
>Well that would insult the bull, then. I suppose anyone that wants to
>slap Jesus would be in a big heap of Do-do then doing such could be
>the kind of occasional sin, many do. When they use the name of God in
>vain. Not so funny, I was in a hurry and missed the "Do do" as I am
>sure you knew.

Better to fuck God off than to upset Satan.

>Thank you for bring that out, now my mother would use such terms as
>she was raised on the farm and a mess by a bull or donkey etc. is
>still a mess. Then that is something that comes natural in most people
>others need a laxative. Then I looked up the word in the dictionary
>and this is what it said "Obscene words for unacceptable behavior"
>which doing "sin" would be. Just I do not like that kind of terms for
>Christians to use. S O R R Y!

That's OK. All your posts are unacceptable because you don't give a
shit what anyone thinks.

>Have a Nice New Year.

Cheers and beers and watch out for the queers.

>Raymond

=-=-=
Barry
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 5:17:49 AM12/28/09
to
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:35:33 GMT, "Zadok" <nob...@accesswave.ca>
wrote:

All posts from raymond contain do do.

>
>Smile.
>
>
>
>

=-=-=
Barry
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 5:19:01 AM12/28/09
to
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:11:18 -0800 (PST), RWKnapp <rwk...@aim.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 27, 6:26�pm, "Michael Christ" <jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:

Don't worry about it. Jesus plays the good cop.

=-=-=
Barry
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 5:34:49 PM12/28/09
to
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:26:31 GMT, "Michael Christ" <jesus...@father.com> wrote:

>What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??

Would you be so kind as to provide us with a list of available sins
that we may choose from?

Remember, Jesus died for your sins, so make it worth his while.

>Michael Christ

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

RWKnapp

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 8:08:50 PM12/28/09
to
On Dec 27, 11:17 pm, dolf <dolfb...@grapple.id.au> wrote:
> I think it was a typo
>
> Do do such ought to read TO DO such
>
> On 28/12/09 3:08 PM, RWKnapp wrote:

Thank you, as I could not think why I would of wrote it the way it
was, and your explanation seems correct.

Raymond

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 8:39:27 PM12/28/09
to
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:08:50 -0800 (PST), RWKnapp <rwk...@aim.com> wrote:

>On Dec 27, 11:17�pm, dolf <dolfb...@grapple.id.au> wrote:
>> I think it was a typo
>>
>> Do do such ought to read TO DO such
>>
>> On 28/12/09 3:08 PM, RWKnapp wrote:
>
>Thank you, as I could not think why I would of wrote it the way it
>was, and your explanation seems correct.

It happened because you English is very poor, and you are proud
of your weaknesses.

>Raymond

RWKnapp

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 10:05:17 PM12/28/09
to
On Dec 28, 8:39 pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:08:50 -0800 (PST), RWKnapp <rwkn...@aim.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 27, 11:17 pm, dolf <dolfb...@grapple.id.au> wrote:
> >> I think it was a typo
>
> >> Do do such ought to read TO DO such
>
> >> On 28/12/09 3:08 PM, RWKnapp wrote:
>
> >Thank you, as I could not think why I would of wrote it the way it
> >was, and your explanation seems correct.
>
> It happened because you English is very poor, and you are proud
> of your weaknesses.
>
> >Raymond
>
> Barry

Thank you, your Chinese is so poor you can not even understand it.
That is your weaknesses, then what has "poor" have to do with
anything. I most likely have more money in the bank then you have and
owe no one anything, no debits etc. Try to have a nice New Years if
you can get beyond yourself.

dolf

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 10:19:41 PM12/28/09
to
When responding to Barry OGrady understand that he has retardation and
that you are having a conversation with someone of diminished
responsibility.

Michael Christ

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 12:09:35 AM12/29/09
to
On Dec 27, 6:26 pm, "Michael Christ" <jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:
> What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>
> Michael Christ

Ray wrote:
>To do such would be like slapping Jesus across the face, something


>that is not too wise to do.

I changed the 'do' to 'to' to save you the utter disgrace of internet
depravity, Ray.

:-). No need to thank me.

My question is directed to those who in their heretic human doctrine think
they can take refuge in 'occasional' sin.

And yes indeed it is a slap in the face of Jesus.


Michael Christ

Michael Christ

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 12:12:35 AM12/29/09
to

"dolf" <dolf...@grapple.id.au> wrote in message
news:CkUZm.65142$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Whilst Michael does like to occasionally dress up in his wife's clothes
> such freedom he describes as swinging naked from Sydney Harbour bridge and
> his pontificating at times is a parody of Cardinal Pell, I'm not sure that
> he would advocate Catholic doctrine on original sin.

True, but you forgot by his member.


Newsgroups Bozo Michael Christ

PS NB: Newsgroups not Newsgroup.

Michael Christ

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 12:13:18 AM12/29/09
to

"Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:rKGdnXcfNYxYk6XW...@westnet.com.au...

Oh you are a sinner alright, Seon.

Michael Christ

Michael Christ

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 12:17:15 AM12/29/09
to

"Barry OGrady" <god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fhcij5pihfk5b5ssb...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:26:31 GMT, "Michael Christ"
> <jesus...@father.com> wrote:
>
>>What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>
> Would you be so kind as to provide us with a list of available sins
> that we may choose from?

No, but I can provide more specific individualized OGrady sin...opening of
the mouth and speaking.


Michael Christ

Seon Ferguson

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 1:18:42 AM12/29/09
to

"Michael Christ" <jesus...@father.com> wrote in message

news:Odg_m.65391$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

And loving it.

> Michael Christ

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 4:20:40 AM12/29/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:19:41 GMT, dolf <dolf...@grapple.id.au> wrote:

I don't approve of you bullshitting about me. Go fuck yourself.

You ISP has been notified.

=-=-=
Barry
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 4:22:56 AM12/29/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:17:15 GMT, "Michael Christ"
<jesus...@father.com> wrote:

>
>"Barry OGrady" <god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:fhcij5pihfk5b5ssb...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:26:31 GMT, "Michael Christ"
>> <jesus...@father.com> wrote:
>>
>>>What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>>
>> Would you be so kind as to provide us with a list of available sins
>> that we may choose from?
>
>No, but I can provide more specific individualized OGrady sin...opening of
>the mouth and speaking.

Please do.

BTW, that should be individualised.

Michael Christ

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 6:09:10 AM12/29/09
to

"Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:koydnQN7S54vAqTW...@westnet.com.au...

Enjoy your time then.

Michael Christ

Seon Ferguson

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 4:24:02 PM12/29/09
to

"Michael Christ" <jesus...@father.com> wrote in message

news:qrl_m.65502$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

I will mr Christ.

>
> Michael Christ

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 6:50:06 AM12/30/09
to
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:05:17 -0800 (PST), RWKnapp <rwk...@aim.com> wrote:

>On Dec 28, 8:39�pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:08:50 -0800 (PST), RWKnapp <rwkn...@aim.com> wrote:
>> >On Dec 27, 11:17 pm, dolf <dolfb...@grapple.id.au> wrote:
>> >> I think it was a typo
>>
>> >> Do do such ought to read TO DO such
>>
>> >> On 28/12/09 3:08 PM, RWKnapp wrote:
>>
>> >Thank you, as I could not think why I would of wrote it the way it
>> >was, and your explanation seems correct.
>>
>> It happened because you English is very poor, and you are proud
>> of your weaknesses.
>>
>> >Raymond
>>
>> Barry
>
>Thank you, your Chinese is so poor you can not even understand it.

That should be, Thank you, Your Chinese is so poor you can not even
understand it.", although your reference to Chinese is irrelevant.

>That is your weaknesses, then what has "poor" have to do with
>anything.

You can't understand because your English is very poor.

>I most likely have more money in the bank then you have and
>owe no one anything, no debits etc.

Then what has that to do with your English?
You probably do have greater assets than me, because you take donations
from people who use your illegal organisation.
I'm sure the Chinese authorities would be most interested in your illegal
activities.

>Try to have a nice New Years if
>you can get beyond yourself.

You should be able to employ a translator to make your posts intelligible.

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 6:50:07 AM12/30/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:19:41 GMT, dolf <dolf...@grapple.id.au> wrote:

>When responding to Barry OGrady understand that he has retardation and
>that you are having a conversation with someone of diminished
>responsibility.

Your name is Dolt, and you are a dolt.

Barry OGrady

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 6:50:08 AM12/30/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:09:35 GMT, "Michael Christ" <jesus...@father.com> wrote:

>On Dec 27, 6:26 pm, "Michael Christ" <jesusisl...@father.com> wrote:
>> What kind of 'occasional' sin have your allowed for yourself today??
>>
>> Michael Christ
>
>Ray wrote:
>>To do such would be like slapping Jesus across the face, something
>>that is not too wise to do.
>
>I changed the 'do' to 'to' to save you the utter disgrace of internet
>depravity, Ray.
>
>:-). No need to thank me.
>
>My question is directed to those who in their heretic human doctrine think
>they can take refuge in 'occasional' sin.

Stop worrying dude. It is not a sin to sin.

>And yes indeed it is a slap in the face of Jesus.

Fortunately for Jesus he has no feelings.

>Michael Christ

0 new messages