Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.religion.christian.adventist
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Who is Vince Garcia, and what does he believe and teach?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
pyotr filipivich  
View profile  
 More options May 5 2012, 2:32 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.bible, alt.christnet.evangelical
From: pyotr filipivich <ph...@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 23:32:51 -0700
Local: Sat, May 5 2012 2:32 am
Subject: Re: Who is Vince Garcia, and what does he believe and teach?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
"what does" on 04 May 2012 22:46:46 GMT typed in
alt.christnet.christianlife  the following:

>> "Theosis and theotokos are not in scripture."

>> The list of supposed "traditions" did not include these.  But having
>evoked
>> the question they are fully found there.  Please don't evoke "if the
>exact
>> name doesn't appear it isn't in scripture" excuse.

>"It is up to you to show all the scripture involved, so rather than have
>you prove two Just do one, Theosis. Take all your steps of theosis and show
>exactly the scripture that supports it. Use the EO doctrines, like the one
>the monk/Bishop wrote. There are no similar names in scripture either."

>It means to become Christ like, as He directed,ie. sanctification.  I'm
>sure you know where in scripture this is found, or do you deny it?  Proof
>texting is not in scripture as you request.  To evoke the practice is to
>request a modern inovation.

>"There is no worship of Mary in any shape or form in the NT either."

>Ah, you said just one and picked it.  Now you want to double dip, shame.

>Correct, and it is not taught as part of any doctrine.  While you have
>evoked the second one, it means "God bearer", ie. the one who bore God in
>her womb.  That would be mother of God in common usage.  Guess who?

>"Your reply will be the third one after which this thread is complete"

>Typical and completely predictable.  Any excuse to cut and run.  That is
>not in scripture.  In fact we are to stand ready to defend what we believe.

        Appears to me, that PeterB is ready to defend what he believes. If
only he knew it.  

        Which seems to put him in the same boat as Vince Garcia: only they
know what they believe, a belief they seem incapable of articulating.
--
pyotr
After the war two Army Chaplains were mustering out.  The one said to
the other "Chaplain, it has been a real pleasure serving God with you.
You in your way, and I in His."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google