Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion ###MORE REVEALING WORDS FROM SEEBER! II
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Theodore M. Seeber  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, tnn.religion.catholic, alt.religion.christian.baptist
From: "Theodore M. Seeber" <seeb...@aracnet.com>
Date: 2000/09/22
Subject: Re: ###MORE REVEALING WORDS FROM SEEBER! II

On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Ted McMillan wrote:
> CONTINUED FROM PART I

> This is the continuation of the very revealing statements made by Ted
> Seeber.  I now make a statement to him:

You now make a lie to me.  Thus proving yourself not to be Christian.

> > >  Your statements are the same despot onliners with no proof!

> > Rather, I've posted SCRIPTURE, the same that you claim to believe in,
> > yet
> > deny with your words, proving yourself to be the anti-christ.

> You have given one-liners and then posted scripture off of the point.

No, I posted Scriptures to the Point.

> I don't expect to see from people in line with the psychiatrists that
> the story of Ananias and Saphira is a demonstration of the Apostles
> killing people.

Did the Apostles work Miracles through the Power of the Holy Spirit or
not?

Your interpretation has problems.

>  Even the Jews falsely accused the Apostles of doing
> that when the word tells us that's not what happened.  They accused the
> Apostles of killing Ananias and Sapphira!

No they didn't.  You missed the point.

> > > You found that with the Protestants.  They didn't give you all your
> > > just deserts even since the French Revolution.  And no, you are in
> the
> > > habit of not proving what you state.  Show the specific chapter and
> > > verse where they became like you all and persecuted.

> > The Letter of Constantine in 400 A.D.  Or did you think that History
> > stopped with the death of the last Apostle?

> I am talking about the Apostles

So am I.

> and not the development of prophecy in
> Rome.

But the story of the Apostles IS the development of Prophecy in Rome.

>  Constantine was a devotee to the Sun till the day of his death.

Got any REAL proof of that statement?  Or just more of your fake Christian
lies?

> > > > > > Which is why instead of ONE Church, there are now 30,000+
> > > > > denominations
> > > > > > serving a small minority of ex-christians.

> > > > > And why are strange people who are ecumenical around in those
> > > churches
> > > > > telling them what Bill Clinton told the world:  "DIVERSITY IS
> THE
> > > > > SECRET OF OUR STRENGTH!" and urged them to have many different
> > > > > confusing opinions and to verbalize them everywhere?

> > > > To gain power.

> > > Well then why fault the Protestant system for being bad, when it is
> > > already heavily infiltrated with you guys?

> > Bill Clinton is not Catholic, nor is he of the Kingdom of Heaven.

> That is not what I asked!

It's what you said.
You claimed that Bill Clinton, above, is an example of the Catholic
infiltration of Government to build the Kingdom of Heaven.  I claimed he
was not.

> Another despot one-liner!  Don't you have something to demonstrate with
> the documentation I gave showing where he was trained and who trained
> him that made him so snuggly with Communists?

I saw no such documentation in this thread, and I delete what I consider
false information from fake Christians like yourself.

But even so, it doesn't matter, for the Communists were not of the Kingdom
of Heaven either, else we would not have overthrown them in
Poland.  Through the very methods of infiltration you showed us.

> > > You all had nothing to do
> > > with it?  You all did not interfere?

> > Why should we care what rebels do to other rebels?

> Well why not then go home and take the equally strange ones

What equally strange ones?

> demanding
> that our church become ecumenical with you

I don't.  I demand that your church CONVERT!

> and see what happens to that
> system you all told the world would collapse because of its own
> inadequacies?

Already collapsed because of it's own inadequacies.  It's hopeless to try
to save it now!

> > > Did you all not know that the
> > > Protestants wanted to show evidence for their claims?

> > Who cares?  Protestant evidence is already corrupt in my mind, because
> > they protested against the authority of Christ.

> Another despot one-liner!

Or is it simply the truth?

>  Can you please have respect for the other
> heretics here who are honest and want to know the truth!!

There are none here in tnn.religion.catholic who need to hear your
lies.  Nor the baptist newsgroup, I suspect.

>  They don't
> want your despot rantings.

Don't care.

>  They want proof with it.  

Then let them, not you, ask for it.

> What proof have
> you that the Protestants protested against the authority of Christ?  

I'll warn you ahead of time, my proof is from Scripture.  Tell me first,
are you going to virtually burn it, like you've deleted so many of my
other quotes from scripture?

> I
> have shown you a scripture that tells us what happens to those who
> loveth and maketh a lie.

Which describes you to a T.

> Tell us what is going to happen to you all!

It's more like what's happening to Adventism with you right now.

> It all changes because you all think that you belong to the true church?

No.  It all changes because the Apostles are still living among us, and I
follow them, rather than you.

> > >  The best way to
> > > demonstrate the truth was to leave it alone and let it come to
> fruition
> > > to be compared with Catholic countries.

> > You mean, how the Protestant UN has been pushing abortion to ruin the
> > ecconomy of Catholic Countries?

> Another lie!  

You deny that the UN is sending Planned Parenthood to third world nations
in an attempt to instill population controls?

> You need to first believe that Christians cannot lie in
> order to tell the truth here.

I'm sorry, you've proven that wrong.

> The UN is a globalist organization AND
> YOU KNOW IT!  It is markedly different in principle from the American
> Constitution.

So what?  Doesn't make it any the less Protestant.

> > > Despot one-liners!  Is that why you all murdered the Serbs?

> > Prove that I had anything to do with the Serbs at all.  I've lived in
> > Oregon all my life, have never been outside of it for more than two
> > weeks
> > at a time.

> Christ told the Pharisees that they say to themselves that had they
> been in the days when their forefather murdered the prophets, they
> would not have taken part, yet now we learn that the church is supposed
> to persecute and kill, and we also learn that freedom of religion is a
> bad thing, and we learned that Christians can lie and do many more
> things to accomplish what they want!

Like you are lying now.  Christ never said any of that.

>  We learned that we should accept
> the idea that pictures can be faked rather than thinking that the
> Ustashis did the things that history documents they did 50 years ago.

I don't care about the Utashis, they weren't Christian either.

> We then learned that Ellen White is a monster compared to the Ustashis!

Don't care about either.

> Christ told the Scribes and Pharisees that they will be accounted just
> as and even more guilty of the blood of the prophets by imbibing the
> same ideas and spirit of their forefathers who murdered the prophets.

So?  What is that to me, who is neither Scribe nor Pharisee, but is
instead Catholic, and following Christ instead of some Man-Made SDA
religion?

> > > > As is Christ himself.  To be not globalistic is to be
> > > > exclusionary.

> > > Globalists were all political.

> > As was Christ, in trying to create the Kingdom of Heaven.

> No proof!  No example to show with Christ's interaction (or lack of it)
> with the governments of His day!

He was against them.  In general.

> Your Christ will be "trying" to create the Kingdom of heaven here.

No, just trying to restore it!

> The
> Adventist Christ, has a different Christ that, when He is ready, will
> come from the skies in glory and CREATE His kingdom then!  HE WILL HAVE
> ALL THE GLORY BECAUSE OF THAT FACT!

The Adventist Christ has failed to show up as predicted.  To me, that's
proof that he doesn't exist at all, that you've invented a new gospel to
preach, a fake gospel to preach.

Where is your Adventist Christ in the world?  He isn't.  But the Catholic
Christ is in every orphanage run by the Catholic Church.  He's in the
homeless shelters in Calcutta.  He's in the sewage drainage fields in
Mexico.  He's out in the world, but he is not of the world.  What good has
your Adventist Christ done at all?  The Catholic Christ died for the sins
of the world.  The Catholic Christ set up a Kingdom, started a religion.

> > You support Protestantism, which claims that alternate denominations
> > are
> > valid (they are not).

> Don't complain about me lying when you struggle to show us that
> Christians can lie!  Are you saying I am a Christian now?

No, actually.  What I am saying is that Christians Can Lie, but choose not
to.  Instead, you are NOT Christian, for you do lie.

> I don't like the varying denominations either, but you all must like
> it, for strange ecumenical people for the Pope are among us telling us
> it is good to have a whole lot of ideas flying around!

It is, as long as they are for Christ.  The more ideas flying around in
service of Christ, the more power Christ has.

>  Even many of
> the Adventist leaders are infiltrators, for they are pushing the same
> thing, and now they cannot accept opposition to ecumenism!

I'm sorry you feel that way.  But it has nothing to do with me, I have no
control over your adventist leaders.  If I did, I'd urge them to stop the
pretense and convert.  Let the Adventist Church and it's false gods die.

> > Liberty and property?
> > Shall we look at Acts Chapter 4 again:
> > [32] And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of
> one
> > soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he
> possessed
> > was his own; but they had all things common.

> THEY GAVE WILLINGLY!

And they had neither Liberty nor Property.  What use is Liberty and
Property in the Kingdom of Heaven?  They are only usefull in the corrupt
secular governments of Earth.

> > [33] And with great power gave the apostles witness of the
> resurrection of
> > the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
> > [34] Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were
> > possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the
> > things that were sold,

> THEY GAVE WILLINGLY!

Yes, so what?
What exactly is your point?  That we should allow evil to continue, that
we should allow the children to starve so that you can have your color TV
set?

> > [35] And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was
> made
> > unto every man according as he had need.

> > Where do you see liberty and the personal right to property in that?

> THEY GAVE WILLINGLY!!

So what?

> I see it in the Roman government that existed right side along it.

I do too.

> That government was not covertly attacked nor infiltrated.

Then why did it fall?

> The
> Apostles told their followers that their portion was to be persecuted
> and not to persecute themselves.

And yet, the Apostles did.

>  They were persecuted by that
> government.

Yes.  So?  400 years later, due to covert attacks and infiltration of the
Roman Government, it fell.  Christianity had replaced the pagan system.

> Since we shouldn't have liberty and rights to property, when can we
> lobby to have these liberties taken away from you Vaticans here in the
> US?

Uh, they have already been.

>  You would like that, wouldn't you?

My property is gladly given in service of the Church whenever
neccessary.  Is yours?

> What about Romans 14, where is said that the Christians must be fully
> persuaded in their own minds?  

As we saw when I quoted the entire chapter, it doesn't say that.

> It meant that they should be fully
> persuaded of the truth, and that they become one by being PERSUADED,
> NOT BY YOUR HOLOCAUSTS!

It doesn't say that either.  The word "HOLOCAUST" is a 20th century
invention.

>  Salvation does not come by laws of the land!
> YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE A PERSON TO BE SAVED!!

But we can encourage it by having nothing to do with those who are not
saved.

> > > > Why should I confirm the lie of a paranoid delusionist who seeks
> to
> > > > separate Christ, and indeed humanity, into separate groups and
> thus
> > > > promote warfare?

> > > Because we need to confirm some more that you are the reincarnated
> > > despots!

> > And you can't, because as we have proven from scripture, you're the
> > one
> > who is a reincarnated despot.

> This is the era of the Antichrist, for I never knew despots to really
> believe in freedom nor liberty.

The Tyranny of the Merchants does.

> You all claim that you are not the
> despots, yet you are all arguing here against liberty of religion and
> everything else.

Yes.  As anybody for TRUTH instead of lies should.

> Why not demonstrate this blessedness you are talking
> about against liberty by giving up yours first?

I did with my confirmation, when I pledged my life to my Lord, Jesus
Christ.

Why you want liberty from him is foreign to me, and it's a thought I
simply don't want to contemplate.

> For your information it is despot who would argue against liberty for
> everyone else but themselves.

I would agree with that.  So why are you trying to argue against liberty
for Catholics?

> The despots are therefore in YOUR
> mirrors!

Your mirror, more like.

> > >  We are here to show the colors of each.  We are here to see a
> > > religion that defends lying, and then calls Ellen White a liar and a
> > > fake.

> > She is what she is, and you are what you are.

> If Christians can lie, as you claim

Those who call themselves Christian quite often lie.

> and are doing constantly in your
> posts on these newsgroups, from what pile of dung did you find your
> consciences to call Ellen White a liar?  You mean she is a Christian?

She called herself one.  As do you.  Myself, I call myself a Catholic.

> And you are what you are.  

Yes.  I am a Catholic.

> That's the problem which we demonstrate
> here.

Yes, it is a problem that you are a liar.

> No need to send in redundant facts.

If all the facts are not examined, then how shall we find truth?

> We learned from
> you "normal" people that Ellen White is alot worse than the Ustashis
> and than you people.

She is.

> She doesn't teach that Christians can lie.

Yes she did, for she called herself Christian and then she lied about the
title of the Pope.

> > >  We need to become like George Washington and Abraham Lincoln as
> > > other paranoid delusionists so that we can go to heaven with them
> > > also!

> > I believe that those two are in hell for promoting the heresy of
> > personal
> > property (and the starvation of millions).

> Then leave the nation that they created and see how much more it will
> be able to out-perform your Catholic ones in every way!

I should leave the 4 million starving children (and 26 million starving
adults) to the tender mercy of your Merchants?

Whyever should I do that?

> There are
> Catholic countries around today, and I don't see your version of
> liberty being applied against them.

It is, but it's done through the religion, so I'm not suprised you don't
see it.

>  They are now virtually poor clones
> of the free nations.  

Better that they be poor than rich, for:
Matt.19
[24] Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a
needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
Mark.10
[25] It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a
rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
Luke.18
[25] For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than
for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

Which one did you not understand?

> Why not demonstrate your plans on them first so
> that we can compare?  

We are, at least, we're trying.  Of course, you Protestants keep coming in
and messing things up.  Agricultural economies need lots of workers, so
you send in the UN to spread abortion and birth control so that the next
generation of workers will not be born.

> Is there a reason why you are not implimenting
> your wonderful plans on the Catholic countries?

We are.  That's the point.

> Is there a reason why
> you cannot demonstrate your principles so that we can see and
> become "fully persuaded" in our own minds?  

We have been.

> Does it have anything to do
> with the fact that you know it would not compare??

Compare with what?  An overly rich culture of death that allows millions
of children to starve?

> Yes!  If you did that, we would NEVER even allow you all around us!  I
> think you know that!  You therefore allow the Catholic countries to
> largely mimick the free ones.

The free ones, ain't so free.  Costs tons to live there.

> > > We need to demonstrate that we are fools for Christ with the
> > > tinfoil hats who will bear witness against the Children of the
> > > Antichrist through evidence.

> > And as we have proven, the one who supports personal liberty and
> property
> > is the antiChrist.

> Who therefore is that who also has the name 666,

Ellen Govld VVhite?
Depends on how you count the name.
Ronald Wilson Reagan works by another method (6 letters each, 3 names).

> who will rule the
> world (as Malachi Martin points out),

Hmm, in our time, Ronald Wilson Reagan, yep.

> who will have the blood of
> prophets on his hands (since we learned that Christians can persecute
> from these persecutors here),

I wonder if there were any prophets in Grenada?  Tripoli?  Panama?  (just
to name the three times Reagan sent out troups to kill people).

And then of course, there were the now beatified Catholic Saints in
Guatamala....

> who will think to change times and laws
> of the Most High, and all?

Trickle Down Ecconomics, anybody?

> Which person do you know of who supports
> personal liberty and property and will fulfill all these things?

Ronald Wilson Reagan did.

> With personal liberty, there can be no persecution!

Yeah, sure, tell us another one.  Tell that to all the Catholics
persecuted by the Klu Klux Klan.

> > > > One wonders if the Anti-Ted is an arms dealer, sowing discord to
> > > > both
> > > > sides in hopes of making money off of the fight.

> > > Just check what the Ustashis did, and we can only conclude that you
> > > will think that about us.  The evidence and discussion has left
> > > naturally.  Just tell us that you couldn't answer!

> > I don't believe the Ustashis exist.  They are only a figment of the
> > Anti-Ted's imagination, created so that he can sell more guns to
> > children.

> Your murderous brothers and sisters DID exist.

I've only heard you talk about them.

> If they didn't exist,
> you would have said so from the beginning,

How could have I?  Until your messages directed at me mentioned them, I
didn't even KNOW about them.

> and, since you
> strange "Christians" can lie, why not explain why even Stephanie and
> others explained who the Ustashis were whom you now lied to us in
> telling us that they don't exist?

Because you have shown us that you put the names of people who do exist
into your false history.
Like Christ.  Took a while, but you finally admited you weren't talking
about the Christ of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, and James.  Instead,
you were talking about the "Adventist Christ" of Ellen Govld VVhite.

> > > DID YOU HEAR ME??!!  Let's see the benefit of it!  We start with
> > > YOUR
> > > CHURCH!!  The one who puts forth this principle should be the first
> > > against whom the experiment be tested!

> > We did.  For 1400 years, we did.  The Guild Ecconomy was the most
> > fair of
> > all ecconomic systems.  Then the greedy Protestants destroyed it.

> For 1400 years the Vatican took away liberty from every other
> institution but itself.

Correct.
And during that time, there was no starvation, war was limited to
Tuesdays, the death penalty was rare (but neccessary, they didn't have the
jails we have today), there was no abortion or birth control.

Hmm, shall we compare?

> I ask again:
> Let's see the benefit of no liberty by passing laws against the machine
> that is now covertly preaching that liberty is a great curse and sin!

Which is what the Vatican was doing in the 1400s, according to YOU!

> Let us test it out against this machine called the Vatican!

BTW, isn't that what the Pope does to himself, with his oaths of office?

> > You are going against the prayer of Christ, John chapter 17.  Go and
> > read
> > it.

> Let's see the benefit of no liberty by passing laws against this
> machine called the Vatican!

Why bother?  The real crime, according to John Chapter 17, is in promoting
nationalism and denominationalism to begin with.  How about this:  If you
give up your denomination and become Catholic, I'll show you how the
Vatican "machine" has no liberty and is in total service to Christ.  Deal?

> > > > The real anti-christ is the one who stands against Christ.

> > > WRONG!  Often the word "ANTI" does not mean AGAINST biblically.

> > Yeah, sure.  Tell us another lie.

> You told us that Christians can lie!  

When?
I've told you that those who call themselves Christian often lie.  But
those who give themselves to Christ utterly, without reservation, do not.

> Can't someone even dream to
> approach your experience on the enterprise??

Sure.  Become Catholic, then we'll chat.

>  Can't anyone be a
> Christian according to your definition?

In fact, just anyone can't be a Christian.  First, you have to give
yourself to Christ.  All of yourself, not just part.  That means giving up
such false ideas as personal liberty and personal property, it all belongs
to Christ now.  Everything you do, everything you are, belongs to
Christ.  Do you dare match this challenge?

> > > It
> > > often meant "in place of" as in the anti-popes that existed during
> the
> > > Great Schism where the Catholic Church took a long time to deal
> with it-
> > > -FAR LONGER than it took you guys to deal with the postings I made
> > > about the Ustashis!

> > I don't care about your made-up lies.

> So, Christians CAN'T LIE??

You're not Christian.

> WHY DID YOU LIE?!!

I don't.  In fact, I've proven every one of my ideas, from Scripture.  You
have yet to quote scripture accurately at all.  Every time we look into
something you say is there, it isn't there.  Romans 14 does not say we
must be persuaded, only that we must follow, for instance.
Ted

--
On this day, the Feast of Hildegard von Bingen
http://www.e3mil.com/church_today/message.asp?message_id=&sec_id=4
Theodore Michael Seeber
Coo! he's the remedial beer.
mailto:seeb...@aracnet.com
Check out the <A
HREF="http://www.aracnet.com/~seebert>IDIC Home Page!</A>
Try our new Biblical Knowledge Quiz, found <A
HREF="http://www.aracnet.com/~seebert/rpv.html>here!</A>
Blessed are the PeaceMakers, for they shall take flack from both sides
-Unofficial UN motto.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google