> --
> monkfish
> * The followup-to header is set to alt.christnet.theology.
> ** alt.atheism is removed from the groups header.
How do you know they are not?
> After all you don't even believe people
> who died for their faith in certain facts.
>
Wanna try that sentence again?
> Actually getting faith is
> rather like falling in love.
Remember Mike, faith is a strong belief. That is something that takes tangable
thought. Weighing the pro's and con's. That's not quite like love.
> We don't know how it comes.
> But we sure can work for it.
>
When it come to what people believe? Your fooling yourself.
> Who is your favorite sex symbol?
> What is your chance of getting her love letter?
> Would you stop "loving" her
> if you don't get any response?
What reason do we have to believe that
God has to exist in the mode prescribed by physicists?
If people say that God is a spirit and God is love,
shouldn't we first figure out what it means for love to exist?
Do physicists believe in love?
>
> "monkfish" <monkfish@nowhere> wrote in message
>
>> Actually getting faith is
>> rather like falling in love.
>
> Remember Mike, faith is a strong belief. That is something that takes
> tangable thought. Weighing the pro's and con's. That's not quite like
> love.
People can fall in love with
intangible things like justice and equality
just as well as other human beings.
Have you ever loved anything or anyone
enough to be willing to risk your life?
Good question, being that I do not personally know any physicists, I've never
been told what mode god is by one.
Do you know any physicists?
> If people say that God is a spirit and God is love,
> shouldn't we first figure out what it means for love to exist?
> Do physicists believe in love?
I'm guessing that they do, but I just don't know any physicists.