Sex Abuse Priest Welcomed Back In Ministry

[Mitchell Holman]

Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
May 19, 2013


http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2013/05/priests_return_to_ministry_aft.htm
l

or.......


http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8

[PATRICK]

Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
>May 19, 2013

>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8

According to your reference:
"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
priest�s eventual return to ministry."

[PATRICK]

Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8

says:

Fugee, 52, has since been granted a leave from ministry, though it
remains unclear whether Myers will seek to permanently remove him from
the priesthood, a lengthy process known as laicization.

[duke]

Poor holoman. He's so desperate he'll hide from truth every chance he gets.

The dukester, American - American

********************************************
Repeal Obama
You simply can't fix stupid.
********************************************

[Alan Ferris]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbark...@woh.rr.com> wrote:

Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet. No
change then. Once a liar, always a liar.

----
"As for Purgatory, I thought we closed it."
- Patrick Barker
----

[default]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:18:04 +0100, Alan Ferris
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbark...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
>>>May 19, 2013
>>>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>>
>>According to your reference:
>>"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
>>priest’s eventual return to ministry."
>
>Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet. No
>change then. Once a liar, always a liar.

Presumably he missed the part about the priest "confessing" to his
abuse. Doubtless the diocese will "cure" him and return him to the
ministry. Isn't forgiveness wonderful?

[default]

The board, composed mainly of lay people appointed by Myers, had at
its disposal Fugee’s police confession, documents from his criminal
trial and a copy of an agreement he signed with law enforcement
pledging he would never again work with children. It also had evidence
of Fugee’s entry in a state rehabilitation program, itself an
acknowledgment of wrongdoing.

Yet the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the

priest’s eventual return to ministry.

Six years later — in the wake of revelations that Fugee blatantly
violated the ban on contact with children, sparking a criminal
investigation and demands for Myers’ ouster — the board’s decision has
come under intense new scrutiny and criticism.

Advocates for sex-abuse victims call it a whitewash. Fugee’s accuser
and his parents said they were unaware the inquiry was even taking
place, characterizing the archdiocese’s attempt to notify them as
perfunctory and inadequate. And a respected national expert said the
ruling defies common sense.

[ala...@hotmail.co.uk]

On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
> >>May 19, 2013
> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>
> >According to your reference:
> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
> >priest’s eventual return to ministry."
>
> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet.  No
> change then.  Once a liar, always a liar.

And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.

The damage these two idiots do to the credibility of catholics in
general is something to behold. And they are too stupid to realize
what they're doing. LOL!

[PATRICK]

It is obvious that you cannot see that this fag-boy priest is not
American. He is from your woods. American Catholic Bishops know how
to handle fag-boys. We kick them out. Just like alvin and alvis
here.
Why you limey fag lovers cannot throw a fag out of the ministry is a
question for your own folks over there. We know what we would have
done. Perhaps you haven't learned your lesson yet.

[ala...@hotmail.co.uk]

On May 26, 7:42 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
> >> >>May 19, 2013
> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>
> >> >According to your reference:
> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
> >> >priest’s eventual return to ministry."
>
> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet.  No
> >> change then.  Once a liar, always a liar.
>
> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.

No answer here? Must mean you agree with the above.

> >The damage these two idiots do to the credibility of catholics in
> >general is something to behold. And they are too stupid to realize
> >what they're doing. LOL!

No answer here?

> It is obvious that you cannot see that this fag-boy priest is not
> American.

Well, that's one point in his favor, I admit.

> He is from your woods.  American Catholic Bishops know how
> to handle fag-boys.  We kick them out.

You catlicks are too obsessed with kicking out the homosexuals, but
not concerned or worried enough to bother kicking out the pedophiles.

Maybe there needs to be something in Leviticus to say that child abuse
is bad. Leviticus only bans adult-on-adult buggery. You catholics are
too stupid to figger out the obvious fact that forced adult-on-child
buggery (or child rape) is worse than consensual adult-on-adult
buggery.

[Good Morning]

In article <4sb2q8592gh1jtjkl...@4ax.com>, PATRICK says...

Fr. Fugee came up through Seton Hall and Immaculate Conception.
What was not American about him?

[duke]

On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), ala...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

>On May 24, 2:18�am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
>> >>May 19, 2013
>> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>>
>> >According to your reference:
>> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
>> >priest�s eventual return to ministry."
>>
>> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet. �No
>> change then. �Once a liar, always a liar.
>
>And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
>Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
>defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.

A wrestling match. Haahaahaa. You can't even turn on TV wrestling without
seeing that. Haahaahaa.

[•RLMeasures]

In article <h504q89age7fpdqb2...@4ax.com>, duke

<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), ala...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>
> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
> >> >>May 19, 2013
> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
> >>
> >> >According to your reference:
> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
> >> >priest’s eventual return to ministry."
> >>
> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of
deciet.  No
> >> change then.  Once a liar, always a liar.
> >
> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>
> A wrestling match. Haahaahaa. You can't even turn on TV wrestling without
> seeing that. Haahaahaa.
>

• Professional wrestlers groping young boys genitals?

[duke]

Could be, although I'm not aware of a pro boys league.

[PATRICK]

On Sat, 25 May 2013 18:57:40 -0700 (PDT), ala...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

>On May 26, 7:42 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
>> >> >>May 19, 2013
>> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>>
>> >> >According to your reference:
>> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
>> >> >priest’s eventual return to ministry."
>>
>> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet.  No
>> >> change then.  Once a liar, always a liar.
>>
>> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
>> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
>> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>
>No answer here? Must mean you agree with the above.

I agree that your reference states the panel found no sexual abuse
occurred. You must also obviously agree with this since it is from
your reference, and you have not disagreed with it.

>
>> >The damage these two idiots do to the credibility of catholics in
>> >general is something to behold. And they are too stupid to realize
>> >what they're doing. LOL!
>
>No answer here?

If you need an answer, then I agree once again that alvin and alvis -
both claiming to be from the UK - are idiots who post references that
their own country can't cope with the fag boys over there.

>
>> It is obvious that you cannot see that this fag-boy priest is not
>> American.
>
>Well, that's one point in his favor, I admit.
>
>> He is from your woods.  American Catholic Bishops know how
>> to handle fag-boys.  We kick them out.
>
>You catlicks are too obsessed with kicking out the homosexuals, but
>not concerned or worried enough to bother kicking out the pedophiles.

same thing, butt-crack.
We can't tell the difference.

>Maybe there needs to be something in Leviticus to say that child abuse
>is bad. Leviticus only bans adult-on-adult buggery. You catholics are
>too stupid to figger out the obvious fact that forced adult-on-child
>buggery (or child rape) is worse than consensual adult-on-adult
>buggery.

Jesus said enough about an adult harming a child.
Do you need a reference?

[PATRICK]

On 26 May 2013 01:00:35 -0700, Good Morning <Good_...@newsguy.com>
wrote:

Where he was stationed.
Where he was caught.
Where he was living.
And the courts that decided to do something.

[PATRICK]

On Sun, 26 May 2013 08:01:43 -0700, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:

Was he a professional wrestler?
Should we start to watch quarterbacks more?

[Good Morning]

In article <d8o4q89t0a9bps5lc...@4ax.com>, PATRICK says...

In other words, he *is* an American,
trained for the priesthood exclusively in American institutions,
and for some reason you need to offer a sophist lie
instead of admitting that you were wrong when you
characterized him as not being an American.

[ala...@hotmail.co.uk]

On May 27, 5:22 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 25 May 2013 18:57:40 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> >On May 26, 7:42 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> >> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
> >> >> >>May 19, 2013
> >> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>
> >> >> >According to your reference:
> >> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
> >> >> >priest’s eventual return to ministry."
>
> >> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet.  No
> >> >> change then.  Once a liar, always a liar.
>
> >> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
> >> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
> >> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>
> >No answer here? Must mean you agree with the above.
>
> I agree

You could hardly disagree with a self-evident truth. You and Duke
never hesitate to defend priest pedopgiles.

> that your reference

Not my reference, fool.

> states the panel found no sexual abuse
> occurred.

After he actually admitted that he was a sex abuser?

And you agree that a priest who deliberately on multiple seperate
occasions, gropes young boys' genitals is not a sex abuser? If that's
the way you see it, then I'd say you cannot and should not be trusted
to be alone with any young child for any length of time at all.

> You must also obviously agree with this since it is from
> your reference, and you have not disagreed with it.

What are you rambling on about?

>
> >> >The damage these two idiots do to the credibility of catholics in
> >> >general is something to behold. And they are too stupid to realize
> >> >what they're doing. LOL!
>
> >No answer here?
>
> If you need an answer, then I agree once again

Exactly. You and Duke are damaging and destroying whatever remaining
credibility catholics in general may have, one moronic usenet post at
a time. And you are both too stupid to realize it, even when it's
pointed out to you. This is why I hope you and Duke never go away. You
had me worried when you went on your recent holiday, but now you're
back and all's well again in a.r.c, the damage and gradual destruction
will continue.

> that alvin and alvis -
> both claiming to be from the UK - are idiots who post references that
> their own country can't cope with the fag boys over there.

What are you blabbering about?

> >> It is obvious that you cannot see that this fag-boy priest is not
> >> American.
>
> >Well, that's one point in his favor, I admit.
>
> >> He is from your woods.  American Catholic Bishops know how
> >> to handle fag-boys.  We kick them out.
>
> >You catlicks are too obsessed with kicking out the homosexuals, but
> >not concerned or worried enough to bother kicking out the pedophiles.
>
> same thing, butt-crack.
> We can't tell the difference.

Seriously? You can't tell the difference between the forcible
violation of a child at the hands of an adult male,
and a consensual act between adults? Barker, you are sicker than I
thought.

And don't you realise that by attributing this attitude to all "good"
catholics and to the RCC in general, you are denigrating all of them?
No, of course you don't, and that's why I hope you keep posting,
regardless of the fact that your depraved POV makes me sick. I'm
hoping it makes many other people sick also. We all need to know what
truly goes on in the "mind" of the average catholic.

> >Maybe there needs to be something in Leviticus to say that child abuse
> >is bad. Leviticus only bans adult-on-adult buggery. You catholics are
> >too stupid to figger out the obvious fact that forced adult-on-child
> >buggery (or child rape) is worse than consensual adult-on-adult
> >buggery.
>
> Jesus said enough about an adult harming a child.
> Do you need a reference?

Well, the OT scribblers say spare the `rod` and you will spoil the
child, makes you wonder what rod those sick fucks were talking about.

[ala...@hotmail.co.uk]

On May 26, 10:35 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
> >> >>May 19, 2013
> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>
> >> >According to your reference:
> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
> >> >priest s eventual return to ministry."
>
> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet. No
> >> change then. Once a liar, always a liar.
>
> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>
> A wrestling match.  Haahaahaa.  You can't even turn on TV wrestling without
> seeing that.  Haahaahaa.

Been watching your gay porn again dukie? There's no sexual groping in
the TV wrestling, and anyway, we're not talking about an organized
wrestling bout, we're discussing a pedo priest who initiates an
impromptu bit of roughousing as an excuse for sexual groping. And
we're talking about you and patrick defending such behavior.

[ala...@hotmail.co.uk]

On May 27, 5:25 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 08:01:43 -0700, r...@somis.org ( RLMeasures) wrote:

> >In article <h504q89age7fpdqb2v120dcj5m2qgga...@4ax.com>, duke
> ><duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>
> >> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>
> >> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
> >> >> >>May 19, 2013
> >> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>
> >> >> >According to your reference:
> >> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
> >> >> >priest s eventual return to ministry."
>
> >> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of
> >deciet. No
> >> >> change then. Once a liar, always a liar.
>
> >> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
> >> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
> >> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>
> >> A wrestling match.  Haahaahaa.  You can't even turn on TV wrestling without
> >> seeing that.  Haahaahaa.
>
> >  Professional wrestlers groping young boys genitals?
>
> Was he a professional wrestler?

No, he was a pedophile priest who liked to grope young boys.

> Should we start to watch quarterbacks more?

No, we need to watch you and Duke more. You both see nothing wrong
with an adult male groping the genitals of young boys left in their
care.

[•RLMeasures]

In article <deb4q8pac1g6gb33d...@4ax.com>, duke

• NAMBLA might have one?

[�RLMeasures]

�In article <fbo4q81nvoeouvpkq...@4ax.com>, PATRICK

� keep your eyes on the towel boys.

[PATRICK]

On Sun, 26 May 2013 16:16:07 -0700 (PDT), ala...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

>On May 27, 5:22 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 May 2013 18:57:40 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>> >On May 26, 7:42 am, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>> >> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
>> >> >> >>May 19, 2013
>> >> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>>
>> >> >> >According to your reference:
>> >> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
>> >> >> >priest’s eventual return to ministry."
>>
>> >> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet.  No
>> >> >> change then.  Once a liar, always a liar.
>>
>> >> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
>> >> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
>> >> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>>
>> >No answer here? Must mean you agree with the above.
>>
>> I agree
>
>You could hardly disagree with a self-evident truth. You and Duke
>never hesitate to defend priest pedopgiles.

I have never defended one of yer butt buddies.

>> that your reference
>
>Not my reference, fool.
>
>> states the panel found no sexual abuse
>> occurred.
>
>After he actually admitted that he was a sex abuser?

Read your reference.
Then get back to me.

>> If you need an answer, then I agree once again

>> that alvin and alvis -
>> both claiming to be from the UK - are idiots who post references that
>> their own country can't cope with the fag boys over there.

>> >You catlicks are too obsessed with kicking out the homosexuals, but
>> >not concerned or worried enough to bother kicking out the pedophiles.
>>
>> same thing, butt-crack.
>> We can't tell the difference.
>
>Seriously? You can't tell the difference between the forcible
>violation of a child at the hands of an adult male,
>and a consensual act between adults? Barker, you are sicker than I
>thought.

Both are immoral, unnatural acts.
Both types of these offenders should be castrated.
Then torn limb from limb an burnt alive.
This includes you and all yer fag buddy priests.

>And don't you realise that by attributing this attitude to all "good"
>catholics and to the RCC in general, you are denigrating all of them?

Both are immoral, unnatural acts.
Both types of these offenders should be castrated.
Then torn limb from limb an burnt alive.
This includes you and all yer fag buddy priests.

[PATRICK]

Then why did you ask?

[duke]

Could be.

[duke]

On Sun, 26 May 2013 16:24:36 -0700 (PDT), ala...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

>On May 26, 10:35 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>> >On May 24, 2:18 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400, PATRICK <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>> >> >>Priest's return to ministry after sex-abuse confession
>> >> >>May 19, 2013
>> >> >>http://tinyurl.com/lb29ol8
>>
>> >> >According to your reference:
>> >> >"et the panel found no sexual abuse occurred, clearing the way for the
>> >> >priest s eventual return to ministry."
>>
>> >> Again Patrick ingores the whole of the information in the search of deciet. No
>> >> change then. Once a liar, always a liar.
>>
>> >And once again we see Earl "the house has been cleaned" Webber and
>> >Patrick "there's no more fags in the RCC" Barker both jumping to the
>> >defense of this priest who likes to grope young boys genitals.
>>
>> A wrestling match.  Haahaahaa.  You can't even turn on TV wrestling without
>> seeing that.  Haahaahaa.

>Been watching your gay porn again dukie? There's no sexual groping in
>the TV wrestling

You watch that crap??? Haahaahaa.

>, and anyway, we're not talking about an organized
>wrestling bout, we're discussing a pedo priest who initiates an
>impromptu bit of roughousing as an excuse for sexual groping. And
>we're talking about you and patrick defending such behavior.

Hands go a lot of places while rough housing.

[ala...@hotmail.co.uk]

On May 27, 9:52 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

Are you still tweaking the nipples of your daughters? Or have they
taken out an injunction against you?

[•RLMeasures]

In article <o2i6q8han4mts5kr5...@4ax.com>, duke

• Ask Fr. Shanley the next time you see him.

[duke]

You keep bringing up his name. You must be a fiend of his. I never met him.

[duke]

Not my style.

[•RLMeasures]

In article <oo49q811dqjf3mose...@4ax.com>, duke

• I never met him either but he was one of the founders of NAMBLA.

[•RLMeasures]

In article <tq49q89ockb18qmft...@4ax.com>, duke

• Your style is not as important as what she
relishes.
```````````````````````````````````````.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <tq49q89ockb18qmft...@4ax.com>,
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

Nice admission that you lost interest in your daughters' nipples once
they became adults.

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[duke]

She who?

[duke]

On Tue, 28 May 2013 12:32:22 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

Never had any interest in them.

[•RLMeasures]

In article <utobq8t0g1gvi4ho4...@4ax.com>, duke

• your GF.

[duke]

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <evobq8h0odb697sqe...@4ax.com>,

Don't lie like that. Your very words stating definitively that have been
posted here many times; I'm sure whoever has it easily accessible will
post it again???? (Please.)

[•RLMeasures]

In article <08rcq81msqja56kqq...@4ax.com>, duke

• he?

[duke]

It's your story, not mine. What are you talking about?

[duke]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:07:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

haahaahaaa. Dumbass jdyke is clueless. Haahaahaa.

[•RLMeasures]

In article <5teeq8hotf9a14gki...@4ax.com>, duke

• taking care of business.