Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
the poster. Typical..........
If you want intelligent discussion, maybe you should start with an
intelligent quotation?
Well, it was a pretty moronic quote...full of the usual theist's
presupposition that there actually *is* some big sadistic critter that
would punish good people for refusing to play it's moronic game of
"hide & seek". And not only *that*, but also claiming that people who
don't believe in the thing would actually *search* for it as they come
closer to death.
If you don't want to be called a moron, stop acting like one.
> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster. Typical..........
Since you've not provided material to begin an intelligent discussion
in the first place, what else is left? Intelligent people already know
you're not going to change your mind, even after being presented with
the mountains of evidence & logic against the position you hold. In
addition, you've made the mistake of posting the quote to at least
*two* newsgroups full of people who have refuted your nonsense again
and again and again and again. Do you *really* think you're the first
person who has posted such bigotry to a.a and a.r.c? You are not. I
can't speak for a.r.c, but over here in a.a, we get ten morons like
you a week.
Insults are all that is left for late-comers like you. You don't start
a conversation with anything profound, and you certainly won't listen
to anything that might threaten your point of view. The only thing
more pathetic than a clown is someone who doesn't realize they
actually *are* one.
You and your ilk fill that role very well.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man, Sep 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
I didn't post it to your newsgroup.
Someone else did.
And, it did cause some discussion that was intelligent.
It also caused you to defend your own lifestyle.
As for those who supposedly live by religious philosophy,
what actions do you feel need to be refuted? Do you actually
feel that religious people are harmful to society?
> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
Well, it was a pretty moronic quote...full of the usual theist's
presupposition that there actually *is* some big sadistic critter that
would punish good people for refusing to play it's moronic game of
"hide & seek". And not only *that*, but also claiming that people who
don't believe in the thing would actually *search* for it as they come
closer to death.
If you don't want to be called a moron, stop acting like one.
> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster. Typical..........
Since you've not provided material to begin an intelligent discussion
in the first place, what else is left? Intelligent people already know
you're not going to change your mind, even after being presented with
the mountains of evidence & logic against the position you hold. In
addition, you've made the mistake of posting the quote to at least
*two* newsgroups full of people who have refuted your nonsense again
and again and again and again. Do you *really* think you're the first
person who has posted such bigotry to a.a and a.r.c? You are not. I
can't speak for a.r.c, but over here in a.a, we get ten morons like
you a week.
PB - And.... you love it, don't you?
Do your insults get you off?
Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
your abilities; the quote was merely the present instance. Apart from
snarky, what is William Murray? Upon what does he base his "lifeboat"
analogy? Upon what does he base his assessment of the amoral
character of those "younger, bigger, or smarter" than any given
individual? Is Murray a disinterested observer of human behavior, or
does he have a dog in the fight?
A non-moron would have foreseen some of these possible objections to
the worth of the quote before posting the thing, and might even have
provided some discussion of it to forestall them.
I didn't post this to your newsgroup.
However, it has been entertaining to see how many loozers
line up when they think a beating is coming.
Thanks for coming to the show.
Be especially careful if those others are Xians. Some will dump you
overboard, and others will try to baptize you as you drown.
>On Dec 30, 8:37�pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...
>>
>> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>
>> >>wrote:
>>
>> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>> >>>out
>> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
>> >>>smarter. William Murray
>>
>> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
>> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>>
>> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
>> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
>> the poster. �Typical..........
The lying psychopath doesn't want "intelligent discussion'. He's
demonstrated this repeatedly. He is just being deliberately,
in-your-face nasty.
>Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
>your abilities; the quote was merely the present instance. Apart from
>snarky, what is William Murray? Upon what does he base his "lifeboat"
>analogy? Upon what does he base his assessment of the amoral
>character of those "younger, bigger, or smarter" than any given
>individual? Is Murray a disinterested observer of human behavior, or
>does he have a dog in the fight?
Does it matter who he is? We know enough about him from what was
quoted. He's just another bigoted Liar For God who goes out of his way
to attack those outside his little fantasy world.
It could be William Murray O'Hair, Madalyn's brother who got love
bombed by the fundies and became one of them. He's a raving loonie who
spends his time attacking straw man atheists who don't exist outside
his imagination.
I've never understood why religion makes people such nasty personal
liars towards the rest of us. Whether it's Patrick the psychopath or
Murray.
>A non-moron would have foreseen some of these possible objections to
>the worth of the quote before posting the thing, and might even have
>provided some discussion of it to forestall them.
He did it deliberately - picked quotes he knew were offensive, posted
them himself so the thoughts were his wherever he stole them from and
hid behind the original writer to pretend the words were somebody
else's.
Once again confirming that he is the dishonest, mentally ill
psychopathic, cowardly and bully his presvious posts told us.
On the off chance that your question is not rhetorical, he's the
surviving son of Madalyn Murray O'Hair.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Murray
Strangely enough, moron, when I clicked on the "reply" button to post
this, at the top of my screen is "Newsgroups: alt.atheism,
alt.recovery.catholicism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic" (the
specific groups were copied and pasted from the list). You were
saying about "I didn't post this to your newsgroup"?
If you MUST lie, attempt to do so in a way that is not so easy to
discover. Only morons do that.
Then he _does_ "have a dog in the fight," doesn't he?
PRB - I subscribe to one newsgroup. It is not to atheists.
Some of your pals enjoy my posts and add newsgroups to the top.
I merely answer the mail.
> Does it matter who he is? We know enough about him from what was
> quoted. He's just another bigoted Liar For God who goes out of his way
> to attack those outside his little fantasy world.
> He did it deliberately - picked quotes he knew were offensive, posted
> them himself so the thoughts were his wherever he stole them from and
> hid behind the original writer to pretend the words were somebody
> else's.
> Once again confirming that he is the dishonest, mentally ill
> psychopathic, cowardly and bully his presvious posts told us.
I merely posted a few quotes to one newsgroup.
I can't help it if your pals threaded it over to yours.
Talk to them if you have issues.
Cowardly? Poor cwissy....
he whines a little too much I think.
Been there. Done that. And you know it.
That the majority of atheist posters to a.a. are over 40 years old is
refutation of his claim.
> I could go on, but there's no point. Why don't you explain why you
> feel the quote was worth posting in the first place so there will be
> something to discuss.
--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer
But I don't know how many people you tried to baptize while they were
drowning, slug.
Was the famous 'Hard-hearted Hannah' one of your teachers in parochial
school?
Yes, Polite Patrick has threatened me with the same.
Seems he has a three year old grandson who will do it.
It's nice to know what Catholics teach their relitives.
Reminds me of the story.........
A drunk guy is wandering around down by the river and he comes across
a group of Baptists who were baptizing one of there own. The drunk
watches what is going on and asks if he can participate. The preacher
grabs the drunk, puts him under the water and pulls him up. The preacher
asks the drunk if he has found Jesus. The drunk says no. The preacher
dunks the guy again and asks him if he has found Jesus. The drunk says no.
One more time under the water and the preacher asks the drunk if he has
found Jesus. The drunk is exasperated and says: "Are you sure he went in
here?"
> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster. Typical..........
Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
your abilities;
PB - Excellent. Enough said.
snippy
> PB - And.... you love it, don't you?
> Do your insults get you off?
Insults? Just speaking plainly. It has been repeatedly shown that
there is an inverse relationship between superstition and
intelligence. This is a fact.
http://www.skeptictank.org/hs/iq_relig.htm
Does attempting to change the subject "get you off"?
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
I provided the quote to the arc newsgroup.
One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
Any more questions?
I suppose you missed the word "recovery" contained within the name of
that group?
> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
Or perhaps a newly recovering ex-Catholic that needed a little help
defending themself from you vultures?
> Any more questions?
Yes. Why do you now whine about how & where you posted that insipid
quote, instead of defending your reasons for posting it?
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
PB - Do you need recovery?
I am here ta heps ya.
-----------
> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
Or perhaps a newly recovering ex-Catholic that needed a little help
defending themself from you vultures?
PB - so he/she/it whines to the atheists for help?
-----------
> Any more questions?
Yes. Why do you now whine about how & where you posted that insipid
quote, instead of defending your reasons for posting it?
PB - I am merely explaining HOW you got to see my post.
Someone asked. I replied.
-----
>Patrick wrote:
>> "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote ...
>
>>> You said, "I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron." Why
>>> would you claim to have posted this quote if you had not?
>
>> I provided the quote to the arc newsgroup.
>> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
>> Any more questions?
>
>In a follow up to another poster, you wrote:
>
>> PB - I am merely explaining HOW you got to see my post.
>> Someone asked. I replied.
>
>No one asked how it go to a.a.. We've been asking you *why* you thought
>it was worth posting in the first place.
The psychopathknows and was weaseling.
> So please explain yourself.
>What about that quote struck you so forcibly you felt it needed to be
>shared with anyone? Why do you agree with it, or what part made you
>feel indignant? Did you think it was clever, insipid, inspiring, vapid?
He's just another dishonest, nasty, psychopathic theist who thinks he
makes a point wiping his bullshit in the faces of people he hates.
>To remind you, this is what you felt was important enough to post
>online:
>
>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>out if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger,
>bigger, or smarter. -- William Murray
And then he pretended the thought's were Murrays not his, as if Murray
had posted it.
Like I said, another dishonest, nasty, psychopathic theist who thinks
he makes a point wiping his bullshit in the faces of people he hates.
Uhmmmmmm.
Because I am smarter and bigger than you?
Because you are a dork and need your ass kicked?
Because I hate listening to liars try to bash the catholics?
Because your stupid athesists are like squeaky wheels?
Pick one.
> So please explain yourself.
Why?
I don't owe you an explanation.
Plus, anything I say will be disputed by you.
How about if I call you a moron? Is that in dispute?
> What about that quote struck you so forcibly you felt it needed to be
> shared with anyone?
Alvin liked it.
Ask him.
>Why do you agree with it, or what part made you
> feel indignant? Did you think it was clever, insipid, inspiring, vapid?
I don't recall.
That was a while ago.
Obviously I thought it was interesting.
Perhaps one of you aa atheist members quoted something
equally as stupid and it required a reply of some kind.
> To remind you, this is what you felt was important enough to post
> online:
>
> Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
> big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
> out if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger,
> bigger, or smarter. -- William Murray
Ahhh, thanks.
Now I remember.... I liked it.
It appears to be a warning to jerk-off atheists who feel
they have the righteous authority to belittle people who believe in God.
If someone wants to discuss a fight, let's get it on.
Since I am not a liar like you, I don't have to keep
all my stories straight. I live in the present. If you wish
to bring up the past, please feel free to do so. However,
I must request that you be specific when you ask about
something I may have said a week ago. Provide the quote,
and then put your words in the form of a question. We'll
all get along better that way.
Gosh, May I quote an ass-wipe: Did you think it was clever, insipid,
inspiring, vapid?
> Here are some tips.
No thanks, I pass.
Don't cry. You'll make your mascara run.
Psychopathrick is a pathological liar. There is nothing to discuss
except to psychoanalyse why he cites such obvious lies and hides
behind the writer. Typical..........
But then we worked that out a long time ago.
> PB - And.... you love it, don't you?
> Do your insults get you off?
Insults? Just speaking plainly. It has been repeatedly shown that
there is an inverse relationship between superstition and
intelligence. This is a fact.
PB - Obviously you have forgotten your post:
"Insults are all that is left for late-comers like you. You don't start
a conversation with anything profound, and you certainly won't listen
to anything that might threaten your point of view. The only thing
more pathetic than a clown is someone who doesn't realize they
actually *are* one."
PB - Either you are using insults, or you are not.
Make up my mind.
Then why do you keep opening yer pie hole?