Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

God Quote 2

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Patrick

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 12:49:53 PM12/30/09
to
Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch out
if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
smarter. William Murray


mani deli

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 2:08:46 PM12/30/09
to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com>
wrote:

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 2:32:16 PM12/30/09
to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
wrote:

Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.

Patrick

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 8:37:12 PM12/30/09
to

"Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...

I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
the poster. Typical..........


Pink Freud

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 8:46:35 PM12/30/09
to

"Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com> wrote in message
news:Wf2dnb81kJzRnaHW...@posted.localnet...

If you want intelligent discussion, maybe you should start with an
intelligent quotation?

Message has been deleted

panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 11:34:57 PM12/30/09
to
On Dec 30, 8:37 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...

>
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>

> >>wrote:
>
> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
> >>>out
> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
> >>>smarter. William Murray
>
> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.

Well, it was a pretty moronic quote...full of the usual theist's
presupposition that there actually *is* some big sadistic critter that
would punish good people for refusing to play it's moronic game of
"hide & seek". And not only *that*, but also claiming that people who
don't believe in the thing would actually *search* for it as they come
closer to death.

If you don't want to be called a moron, stop acting like one.

> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster.  Typical..........

Since you've not provided material to begin an intelligent discussion
in the first place, what else is left? Intelligent people already know
you're not going to change your mind, even after being presented with
the mountains of evidence & logic against the position you hold. In
addition, you've made the mistake of posting the quote to at least
*two* newsgroups full of people who have refuted your nonsense again
and again and again and again. Do you *really* think you're the first
person who has posted such bigotry to a.a and a.r.c? You are not. I
can't speak for a.r.c, but over here in a.a, we get ten morons like
you a week.

Insults are all that is left for late-comers like you. You don't start
a conversation with anything profound, and you certainly won't listen
to anything that might threaten your point of view. The only thing
more pathetic than a clown is someone who doesn't realize they
actually *are* one.

You and your ilk fill that role very well.

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man, Sep 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html

Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 8:31:12 AM12/31/09
to
"L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote .
> Patrick wrote:
>> "Christopher A. Lee" wrote

>>>mani deli wrote:
>>>>"Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you
>>>>>are
>>>>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But
>>>>>watch
>>>>>out if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger,
>>>>>bigger,
>>>>> or smarter. William Murray
>
>>> Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
>>> Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
>> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
>> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
>> the poster. Typical..........
>
> You provided nothing intelligent to discuss. A quote isn't an argument,
> and this particular string of words is quite stupid, and your posting of
> it suggests you agree with it, meaning you are foolish.
>
> For starters, atheism isn't a philosophy. The implication that atheism
> is about dog-eat-dog and non-cooperation is extremely idiotic, and the
> additional implication that a religious philosophy is by nature helpful
> and respectful of others is refuted daily by the actions of those who
> actually live by religious philosophies. There is also the statement
> that atheism is only for younger people, which implies only for those
> who lack wisdom or at least life experience, with the additional
> implication that religious philosophies are for the wise, implications
> that are also refuted daily.
> I could go on, but there's no point. Why don't you explain why you feel
> the quote was worth posting in the first place so there will be
> something to discuss.

I didn't post it to your newsgroup.
Someone else did.
And, it did cause some discussion that was intelligent.
It also caused you to defend your own lifestyle.
As for those who supposedly live by religious philosophy,
what actions do you feel need to be refuted? Do you actually
feel that religious people are harmful to society?

Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 8:33:59 AM12/31/09
to
<panam...@hotmail.com> wrote

> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.

Well, it was a pretty moronic quote...full of the usual theist's
presupposition that there actually *is* some big sadistic critter that
would punish good people for refusing to play it's moronic game of
"hide & seek". And not only *that*, but also claiming that people who
don't believe in the thing would actually *search* for it as they come
closer to death.
If you don't want to be called a moron, stop acting like one.

> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster. Typical..........

Since you've not provided material to begin an intelligent discussion
in the first place, what else is left? Intelligent people already know
you're not going to change your mind, even after being presented with
the mountains of evidence & logic against the position you hold. In
addition, you've made the mistake of posting the quote to at least
*two* newsgroups full of people who have refuted your nonsense again
and again and again and again. Do you *really* think you're the first
person who has posted such bigotry to a.a and a.r.c? You are not. I
can't speak for a.r.c, but over here in a.a, we get ten morons like
you a week.

PB - And.... you love it, don't you?
Do your insults get you off?


Don Martin

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 8:46:52 AM12/31/09
to
On Dec 30, 8:37 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...

>
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>

> >>wrote:
>
> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
> >>>out
> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
> >>>smarter. William Murray
>
> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster.  Typical..........

Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
your abilities; the quote was merely the present instance. Apart from
snarky, what is William Murray? Upon what does he base his "lifeboat"
analogy? Upon what does he base his assessment of the amoral
character of those "younger, bigger, or smarter" than any given
individual? Is Murray a disinterested observer of human behavior, or
does he have a dog in the fight?

A non-moron would have foreseen some of these possible objections to
the worth of the quote before posting the thing, and might even have
provided some discussion of it to forestall them.

Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 9:06:56 AM12/31/09
to
"Don Martin" <drdon...@comcast.net> wrote

I didn't post this to your newsgroup.
However, it has been entertaining to see how many loozers
line up when they think a beating is coming.
Thanks for coming to the show.


ar...@hobbiton.net

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 9:27:13 AM12/31/09
to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, the slug <bark...@erinot.com>
wrote:

Be especially careful if those others are Xians. Some will dump you
overboard, and others will try to baptize you as you drown.

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 9:28:18 AM12/31/09
to
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:46:52 -0800 (PST), Don Martin
<drdon...@comcast.net> wrote:

>On Dec 30, 8:37�pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...
>>
>> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>
>> >>wrote:
>>
>> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>> >>>out
>> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
>> >>>smarter. William Murray
>>
>> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
>> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>>
>> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
>> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
>> the poster. �Typical..........

The lying psychopath doesn't want "intelligent discussion'. He's
demonstrated this repeatedly. He is just being deliberately,
in-your-face nasty.

>Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
>your abilities; the quote was merely the present instance. Apart from
>snarky, what is William Murray? Upon what does he base his "lifeboat"
>analogy? Upon what does he base his assessment of the amoral
>character of those "younger, bigger, or smarter" than any given
>individual? Is Murray a disinterested observer of human behavior, or
>does he have a dog in the fight?

Does it matter who he is? We know enough about him from what was
quoted. He's just another bigoted Liar For God who goes out of his way
to attack those outside his little fantasy world.

It could be William Murray O'Hair, Madalyn's brother who got love
bombed by the fundies and became one of them. He's a raving loonie who
spends his time attacking straw man atheists who don't exist outside
his imagination.

I've never understood why religion makes people such nasty personal
liars towards the rest of us. Whether it's Patrick the psychopath or
Murray.

>A non-moron would have foreseen some of these possible objections to
>the worth of the quote before posting the thing, and might even have
>provided some discussion of it to forestall them.

He did it deliberately - picked quotes he knew were offensive, posted
them himself so the thoughts were his wherever he stole them from and
hid behind the original writer to pretend the words were somebody
else's.

Once again confirming that he is the dishonest, mentally ill
psychopathic, cowardly and bully his presvious posts told us.

ar...@hobbiton.net

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 9:37:07 AM12/31/09
to
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:46:52 -0800 (PST), Don Martin
<drdon...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Dec 30, 8:37�pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...
>> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>
>> >>wrote:
>>
>> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>> >>>out
>> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
>> >>>smarter. William Murray
>>
>> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
>> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>>
>> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
>> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
>> the poster. �Typical..........
>
>Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
>your abilities; the quote was merely the present instance. Apart from
>snarky, what is William Murray?

On the off chance that your question is not rhetorical, he's the
surviving son of Madalyn Murray O'Hair.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Murray

Don Martin

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 11:23:38 AM12/31/09
to
On Dec 31, 9:06 am, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "Don Martin" <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote

Strangely enough, moron, when I clicked on the "reply" button to post
this, at the top of my screen is "Newsgroups: alt.atheism,
alt.recovery.catholicism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic" (the
specific groups were copied and pasted from the list). You were
saying about "I didn't post this to your newsgroup"?

If you MUST lie, attempt to do so in a way that is not so easy to
discover. Only morons do that.

Don Martin

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 11:25:04 AM12/31/09
to
On Dec 31, 9:37 am, ar...@hobbiton.net wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:46:52 -0800 (PST), Don Martin
>
>
>
> <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >On Dec 30, 8:37 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> >> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...
> >> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>
> >> >>wrote:
>
> >> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
> >> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
> >> >>>out
> >> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
> >> >>>smarter. William Murray
>
> >> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
> >> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
> >> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
> >> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> >> the poster.  Typical..........
>
> >Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
> >your abilities; the quote was merely the present instance.  Apart from
> >snarky, what is William Murray?  
>
> On the off chance that your question is not rhetorical, he's the
> surviving son of Madalyn Murray O'Hair.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Murray

Then he _does_ "have a dog in the fight," doesn't he?


Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 2:04:57 PM12/31/09
to
"Don Martin" <drdon...@comcast.net> wrote ..

PRB - I subscribe to one newsgroup. It is not to atheists.
Some of your pals enjoy my posts and add newsgroups to the top.
I merely answer the mail.

Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 2:07:56 PM12/31/09
to
"Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote

> Does it matter who he is? We know enough about him from what was


> quoted. He's just another bigoted Liar For God who goes out of his way
> to attack those outside his little fantasy world.

> He did it deliberately - picked quotes he knew were offensive, posted
> them himself so the thoughts were his wherever he stole them from and
> hid behind the original writer to pretend the words were somebody
> else's.
> Once again confirming that he is the dishonest, mentally ill
> psychopathic, cowardly and bully his presvious posts told us.

I merely posted a few quotes to one newsgroup.
I can't help it if your pals threaded it over to yours.
Talk to them if you have issues.
Cowardly? Poor cwissy....
he whines a little too much I think.


Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 2:09:45 PM12/31/09
to
"Don Martin" <drdon...@comcast.net> wrote .

PB - Only if you want your ass kicked.


Patrick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 2:10:39 PM12/31/09
to

<ar...@hobbiton.net> wrote in message
news:95dpj5lud3gnk72pb...@4ax.com...

Been there. Done that. And you know it.


Smiler

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 10:32:15 PM12/31/09
to
L. Raymond wrote:
> Patrick wrote:
>> "Christopher A. Lee" wrote
>>> mani deli wrote:
>>>> "Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as
>>>>> you are big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and
>>>>> thirty-five. But watch out if you are in a lifeboat and there are
>>>>> others who are younger, bigger, or smarter. William Murray
>
>>> Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
>>> Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
>> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
>> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
>> the poster. Typical..........
>
> You provided nothing intelligent to discuss. A quote isn't an
> argument, and this particular string of words is quite stupid, and
> your posting of it suggests you agree with it, meaning you are
> foolish.
>
> For starters, atheism isn't a philosophy. The implication that
> atheism is about dog-eat-dog and non-cooperation is extremely
> idiotic, and the additional implication that a religious philosophy
> is by nature helpful and respectful of others is refuted daily by the
> actions of those who actually live by religious philosophies. There
> is also the statement that atheism is only for younger people, which
> implies only for those who lack wisdom or at least life experience,
> with the additional implication that religious philosophies are for
> the wise, implications that are also refuted daily.
>

That the majority of atheist posters to a.a. are over 40 years old is
refutation of his claim.

> I could go on, but there's no point. Why don't you explain why you
> feel the quote was worth posting in the first place so there will be
> something to discuss.

--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer


ar...@hobbiton.net

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 10:55:45 PM12/31/09
to
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:10:39 -0500, the slug <bark...@erinot.com>

wrote:
><ar...@hobbiton.net> wrote in message
>news:95dpj5lud3gnk72pb...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, the slug <bark...@erinot.com>
>> wrote:
>>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>>>out
>>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
>>>smarter. William Murray
>>
>> Be especially careful if those others are Xians. Some will dump you
>> overboard, and others will try to baptize you as you drown.
>
>Been there. Done that. And you know it.

But I don't know how many people you tried to baptize while they were
drowning, slug.
Was the famous 'Hard-hearted Hannah' one of your teachers in parochial
school?

Mike Painter

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 11:45:17 PM12/31/09
to

Yes, Polite Patrick has threatened me with the same.
Seems he has a three year old grandson who will do it.
It's nice to know what Catholics teach their relitives.


Patrick

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 2:10:53 PM1/1/10
to
<ar...@hobbiton.net> wrote ...

> <bark...@erinot.com>> wrote:
>><ar...@hobbiton.net> wrote in message
...>>> <bark...@erinot.com>

>>> wrote:
>>>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>>>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>>>>out
>>>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger,
>>>>or
>>>>smarter. William Murray
>>>
>>> Be especially careful if those others are Xians. Some will dump you
>>> overboard, and others will try to baptize you as you drown.
>>
>>Been there. Done that. And you know it.
>
> But I don't know how many people you tried to baptize while they were
> drowning, slug.
> Was the famous 'Hard-hearted Hannah' one of your teachers in parochial
> school?

Reminds me of the story.........
A drunk guy is wandering around down by the river and he comes across
a group of Baptists who were baptizing one of there own. The drunk
watches what is going on and asks if he can participate. The preacher
grabs the drunk, puts him under the water and pulls him up. The preacher
asks the drunk if he has found Jesus. The drunk says no. The preacher
dunks the guy again and asks him if he has found Jesus. The drunk says no.
One more time under the water and the preacher asks the drunk if he has
found Jesus. The drunk is exasperated and says: "Are you sure he went in
here?"


Patrick

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 4:58:07 PM1/1/10
to
"Don Martin" <drdon...@comcast.net> wrote

> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster. Typical..........

Oh, we have a sufficient stock of your behaviors on hand to assess
your abilities;

PB - Excellent. Enough said.


panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 5:49:27 PM1/1/10
to
On Dec 31 2009, 8:33 am, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:

snippy

> PB - And.... you love it, don't you?
> Do your insults get you off?

Insults? Just speaking plainly. It has been repeatedly shown that
there is an inverse relationship between superstition and
intelligence. This is a fact.

http://www.skeptictank.org/hs/iq_relig.htm

Does attempting to change the subject "get you off"?

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!

Message has been deleted

Patrick

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 1:08:13 PM1/2/10
to
"L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote ...
> You said, "I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron." Why
> would you claim to have posted this quote if you had not?

I provided the quote to the arc newsgroup.
One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
Any more questions?


panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:10:10 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 2, 1:08 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Patrick wrote:
> >> "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote .
> >>> Patrick wrote:
> >>>> "Christopher A. Lee" wrote
> >>>>>mani deli wrote:

I suppose you missed the word "recovery" contained within the name of
that group?

> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.

Or perhaps a newly recovering ex-Catholic that needed a little help
defending themself from you vultures?

> Any more questions?

Yes. Why do you now whine about how & where you posted that insipid
quote, instead of defending your reasons for posting it?

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!

Patrick

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 8:31:39 AM1/3/10
to
<panam...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:db22b9cf-acff-4566...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

PB - Do you need recovery?
I am here ta heps ya.
-----------

> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.

Or perhaps a newly recovering ex-Catholic that needed a little help
defending themself from you vultures?

PB - so he/she/it whines to the atheists for help?
-----------

> Any more questions?

Yes. Why do you now whine about how & where you posted that insipid
quote, instead of defending your reasons for posting it?

PB - I am merely explaining HOW you got to see my post.
Someone asked. I replied.
-----


Message has been deleted

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:47:41 AM1/3/10
to
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:19:25 -0600, "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com>
wrote:

>Patrick wrote:
>> "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote ...


>
>>> You said, "I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron." Why
>>> would you claim to have posted this quote if you had not?
>
>> I provided the quote to the arc newsgroup.
>> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
>> Any more questions?
>

>In a follow up to another poster, you wrote:
>
>> PB - I am merely explaining HOW you got to see my post.
>> Someone asked. I replied.
>

>No one asked how it go to a.a.. We've been asking you *why* you thought
>it was worth posting in the first place.

The psychopathknows and was weaseling.

> So please explain yourself.
>What about that quote struck you so forcibly you felt it needed to be
>shared with anyone? Why do you agree with it, or what part made you
>feel indignant? Did you think it was clever, insipid, inspiring, vapid?

He's just another dishonest, nasty, psychopathic theist who thinks he
makes a point wiping his bullshit in the faces of people he hates.

>To remind you, this is what you felt was important enough to post
>online:


>
>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
>out if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger,

>bigger, or smarter. -- William Murray

And then he pretended the thought's were Murrays not his, as if Murray
had posted it.

Like I said, another dishonest, nasty, psychopathic theist who thinks
he makes a point wiping his bullshit in the faces of people he hates.

Patrick

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:22:42 PM1/3/10
to
"L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote in message
news:11c6t21pcs14k.c...@40tude.net...
> Patrick wrote:
>> "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote ...

>
>>> You said, "I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron." Why
>>> would you claim to have posted this quote if you had not?
>
>> I provided the quote to the arc newsgroup.
>> One of your jerk-off friends re-posted it to your newsgroup.
>> Any more questions?
>
> In a follow up to another poster, you wrote:
>
>> PB - I am merely explaining HOW you got to see my post.
>> Someone asked. I replied.
>
> No one asked how it go to a.a.. We've been asking you *why* you thought
> it was worth posting in the first place.

Uhmmmmmm.
Because I am smarter and bigger than you?
Because you are a dork and need your ass kicked?
Because I hate listening to liars try to bash the catholics?
Because your stupid athesists are like squeaky wheels?
Pick one.

> So please explain yourself.

Why?
I don't owe you an explanation.
Plus, anything I say will be disputed by you.
How about if I call you a moron? Is that in dispute?


> What about that quote struck you so forcibly you felt it needed to be
> shared with anyone?

Alvin liked it.
Ask him.

>Why do you agree with it, or what part made you
> feel indignant? Did you think it was clever, insipid, inspiring, vapid?

I don't recall.
That was a while ago.
Obviously I thought it was interesting.
Perhaps one of you aa atheist members quoted something
equally as stupid and it required a reply of some kind.


> To remind you, this is what you felt was important enough to post
> online:
>

> Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
> big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
> out if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger,

> bigger, or smarter. -- William Murray

Ahhh, thanks.
Now I remember.... I liked it.
It appears to be a warning to jerk-off atheists who feel
they have the righteous authority to belittle people who believe in God.


Patrick

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:23:38 PM1/3/10
to

"Mike Painter" <md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:u5f%m.117$%P5...@newsfe21.iad...

If someone wants to discuss a fight, let's get it on.


Message has been deleted

Patrick

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 5:11:31 PM1/4/10
to
"L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote ...
> Patrick wrote:
>> "L. Raymond" wrote

>
>>>Why do you agree with it, or what part made you
>>> feel indignant? Did you think it was clever, insipid, inspiring, vapid?
>
>> I don't recall.
>> That was a while ago.
>
> If your thoughts are so pointless and boring that even you can't recall
> them after a few days, what makes you think they are worth sharing with
> everyone else? Have you no sense of shame that can protect you from
> making a fool of yourself?

Since I am not a liar like you, I don't have to keep
all my stories straight. I live in the present. If you wish
to bring up the past, please feel free to do so. However,
I must request that you be specific when you ask about
something I may have said a week ago. Provide the quote,
and then put your words in the form of a question. We'll
all get along better that way.


Message has been deleted

Patrick

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 3:58:34 PM1/5/10
to
> Good grief. You can't even troll with imagination. That's so pathetic.

Gosh, May I quote an ass-wipe: Did you think it was clever, insipid,
inspiring, vapid?

> Here are some tips.

No thanks, I pass.


Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 7:52:53 PM1/5/10
to
On Dec 30 2009, 8:37 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in messagenews:0kanj51t4glub6o8r...@4ax.com...
>
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:46 -0500, mani deli <nob...@rinterlog.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:49:53 -0500, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>
> >>wrote:

>
> >>>Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are
> >>>big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch
> >>>out
> >>>if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or
> >>>smarter. William Murray

>
> > Not content with telling us he is a pychopath a couple of weeks ago,
> > Patrick now wants to tell us that he is a clinical moron.
>
> I merely provide a quote, and you call me a moron.
> Since you cannot provide an intelligent discussion, you insult
> the poster.  Typical..........

Don't cry. You'll make your mascara run.

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 8:02:14 PM1/5/10
to

Psychopathrick is a pathological liar. There is nothing to discuss
except to psychoanalyse why he cites such obvious lies and hides
behind the writer. Typical..........

But then we worked that out a long time ago.

Patrick

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:03:39 PM1/5/10
to
<panam...@hotmail.com> wrote .

On Dec 31 2009, 8:33 am, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
snippy

> PB - And.... you love it, don't you?
> Do your insults get you off?

Insults? Just speaking plainly. It has been repeatedly shown that
there is an inverse relationship between superstition and
intelligence. This is a fact.

PB - Obviously you have forgotten your post:
"Insults are all that is left for late-comers like you. You don't start
a conversation with anything profound, and you certainly won't listen
to anything that might threaten your point of view. The only thing
more pathetic than a clown is someone who doesn't realize they
actually *are* one."

PB - Either you are using insults, or you are not.
Make up my mind.


Patrick

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:05:06 PM1/5/10
to
"Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> There is nothing to discuss
> except to psychoanalyse why he cites such obvious lies and hides
> behind the writer. Typical..........

Then why do you keep opening yer pie hole?


0 new messages