Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A Real Gay thing (Maybe) (0/1)
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Ex-AA_Forev...@myplace.com
May 17, 2012, 2:04:54 PM5/17/12
to
Does this sound Gay?
(See next message).
(See next message).
Rob D.
May 29, 2012, 8:40:36 AM5/29/12
to
On May 17, 1:04 pm, Ex-AA_Forever#742830...@myplace.com wrote:
> Does this sound Gay?
>
> (See next message).
What did this post have to do with alcoholism or recovery?
> Does this sound Gay?
>
> (See next message).
#16 in a series.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 10:00:27 AM5/29/12
to
Rob D.
May 29, 2012, 10:14:35 AM5/29/12
to
Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
It just struck me as rich that ex complains about people "using ARAA as a
chat room," and for "off-topic" posts.
And just how long did it take to mark 17 OT posts in threads started by ex,
under his ex nym? Mebbe 10 minutes, tops.
I doubt very much you could come anywhere close to that with any other
poster on ARAA.
I'm really just pushing his nose in it a bit, not that I think it would
really ever do any good.
I suppose we could start up a round of ex-Bingo . . . it might be
entertaining, if nothing else.
Rob
Ted L.
May 29, 2012, 10:17:54 AM5/29/12
to
In article
<154835408359993412.361531...@nntp.aioe.org>,
fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
--
Ted L.
Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini.
<154835408359993412.361531...@nntp.aioe.org>,
Rob D. <addre...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>
I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works just
>
> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>
fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
--
Ted L.
Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 10:33:37 AM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 7:14 AM, Rob D. wrote:
change but I'm up for multiple changes.
> It just struck me as rich that ex complains about people "using ARAA as a
> chat room," and for "off-topic" posts.
Guess I missed that. ;)
> And just how long did it take to mark 17 OT posts in threads started by ex,
> under his ex nym? Mebbe 10 minutes, tops.
How long to change or add a filter? Few seconds (that includes temp
filters on subject lines).
> I doubt very much you could come anywhere close to that with any other
> poster on ARAA.
<shrug>
> I'm really just pushing his nose in it a bit, not that I think it would
> really ever do any good.
"Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
> "F.H." wrote:
>> On 5/29/2012 5:40 AM, Rob D. wrote:
>>> What did this post have to do with alcoholism or recovery?
>> On 5/29/2012 5:40 AM, Rob D. wrote:
>>> What did this post have to do with alcoholism or recovery?
>> When all else fails, consider filtering???
>
> Sure, Frank.
>
> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
I've had no trouble. Maybe that's because he gets enough action without
>
> Sure, Frank.
>
> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
change but I'm up for multiple changes.
> It just struck me as rich that ex complains about people "using ARAA as a
> chat room," and for "off-topic" posts.
> And just how long did it take to mark 17 OT posts in threads started by ex,
> under his ex nym? Mebbe 10 minutes, tops.
filters on subject lines).
> I doubt very much you could come anywhere close to that with any other
> poster on ARAA.
> I'm really just pushing his nose in it a bit, not that I think it would
> really ever do any good.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 12:42:32 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 10:33 AM, F.H. wrote:
>
> "Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
>
Sounds like you know my old ex wife.
>
> "Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
>
--
Dr. Skeezix LaRocca, D.B. (Doctor Of Buffoonery)
Registered Linux Novice & Abuser #526706
We aren't cheap, but we're reasonable
No appointment needed
CharlieM1958
May 29, 2012, 12:46:40 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 11:42 AM, Skeezix LaRocca wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 10:33 AM, F.H. wrote:
>
>>
>> "Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
>>
>
> Sounds like you know my old ex wife.
Yep. She used to say that about you all the time.
> On 05/29/2012 10:33 AM, F.H. wrote:
>
>>
>> "Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
>>
>
> Sounds like you know my old ex wife.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 12:50:38 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 12:46 PM, CharlieM1958 wrote:
>
> Yep. She used to say that about you all the time.
I may have been a pig but that foul broad turned into a gorilla...Yes,
>
> Yep. She used to say that about you all the time.
she had hair on her big nips.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 1:03:23 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 9:42 AM, Skeezix LaRocca wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 10:33 AM, F.H. wrote:
>> "Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
> Sounds like you know my old ex wife.
How old is she? She so old that when you told her to "act her age" the
> On 05/29/2012 10:33 AM, F.H. wrote:
>> "Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it."
> Sounds like you know my old ex wife.
bitch dropped dead.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 1:36:22 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 01:03 PM, F.H. wrote:
>
> How old is she? She so old that when you told her to "act her age" the
> bitch dropped dead.
>
She's around 59 now, but I swear she looks like an overstuffed hand
>
> How old is she? She so old that when you told her to "act her age" the
> bitch dropped dead.
>
puppet of at least 70...When I first met her back in '74, she was a cute
little shit...I know, I know, you're gonna say I'm just another dickhead
that's trashing his ex wife...Hey, we all hit the wall sooner or later,
but this broad demolished it.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 2:22:17 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 10:36 AM, Skeezix LaRocca wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 01:03 PM, F.H. wrote:
>> How old is she? She so old that when you told her to "act her age" the
>> bitch dropped dead.
> She's around 59 now, but I swear she looks like an overstuffed hand
> puppet of at least 70...
70??? Holy crap!
> On 05/29/2012 01:03 PM, F.H. wrote:
>> How old is she? She so old that when you told her to "act her age" the
>> bitch dropped dead.
> She's around 59 now, but I swear she looks like an overstuffed hand
> puppet of at least 70...
> When I first met her back in '74, she was a cute little shit...I know,
> I know, you're gonna say I'm just another dickhead that's trashing his
> ex wife...
so ugly she made blind children cry.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 3:16:47 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 02:22 PM, F.H. wrote:
>
> 70??? Holy crap!
Well, in all honesty, I'll say 65 & well worn.
>
> That would be hypocritical. My number 2 (as I fondly refer to her) got
> so ugly she made blind children cry.
>
>
Haa haa...Sweet Baby Jaysus, that's good.
>
> 70??? Holy crap!
Well, in all honesty, I'll say 65 & well worn.
>
> That would be hypocritical. My number 2 (as I fondly refer to her) got
> so ugly she made blind children cry.
>
>
Groundhog
May 29, 2012, 3:43:59 PM5/29/12
to
couldn't imagine sloppy seconds after you.
--
mgh
~
groundhog mobile
Tommy
May 29, 2012, 4:10:23 PM5/29/12
to
"Rob D."
<> I'm really just pushing his nose in it a bit, not that I think it would
> really ever do any good.
No you are not Rob - you are giving him that which he desires - attention
and pi55ing the rest of us off in the meantime.
To destroy a troll, you ignore him/her/it.
If you want to filter him just filter on "where the from line contains
'Ex-AA forever'
You, and the others that reply to him, would really be doing the newsgroup
as a whole a favour, plus cutting down on rubbish.
Its so simple to filter, that I'm amused at how few people will do it - yet
complain endlessly about what their eyes behold :-)
CHeers
Tommy
<> I'm really just pushing his nose in it a bit, not that I think it would
> really ever do any good.
and pi55ing the rest of us off in the meantime.
To destroy a troll, you ignore him/her/it.
If you want to filter him just filter on "where the from line contains
'Ex-AA forever'
You, and the others that reply to him, would really be doing the newsgroup
as a whole a favour, plus cutting down on rubbish.
Its so simple to filter, that I'm amused at how few people will do it - yet
complain endlessly about what their eyes behold :-)
CHeers
Tommy
Tex
May 29, 2012, 5:47:49 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 21:10:23 +0100, "Tommy"
<tommyle...@geemale.com> wrote:
>Its so simple to filter, that I'm amused at how few people will do it - yet
>complain endlessly about what their eyes behold :-)
>
>CHeers
>Tommy
I could filter people ... but I don't see the point. Others can filter
<tommyle...@geemale.com> wrote:
>Its so simple to filter, that I'm amused at how few people will do it - yet
>complain endlessly about what their eyes behold :-)
>
>CHeers
>Tommy
or not ... whatever suits them ... at least that is my personal take
on it.
Tex
May 29, 2012, 5:52:54 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:22:17 -0700, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net>
wrote:
I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time & space with
them.
wrote:
known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time & space with
them.
Ted L.
May 29, 2012, 5:54:04 PM5/29/12
to
In article <ibgas71hle21khvul...@4ax.com>,
to skip place and mark as read somebody you know you have no interest in
reading. In my old age I'm getting very lazy.
Tex <twiz...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I could filter people ... but I don't see the point. Others can filter
> or not ... whatever suits them ... at least that is my personal take
> on it.
The point is that it saves the few clicks or key presses it would take
> I could filter people ... but I don't see the point. Others can filter
> or not ... whatever suits them ... at least that is my personal take
> on it.
to skip place and mark as read somebody you know you have no interest in
reading. In my old age I'm getting very lazy.
Tommy
May 29, 2012, 6:12:33 PM5/29/12
to
"Tex" <twiz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ibgas71hle21khvul...@4ax.com...
Yabbutt you weren't complaining when we post something you dont like :-)
Except for Skeetzer when he compliments you, or was that Charlie M -
Somethimes they double-gang you you heh heh
Cheers
Tommy
news:ibgas71hle21khvul...@4ax.com...
Except for Skeetzer when he compliments you, or was that Charlie M -
Somethimes they double-gang you you heh heh
Cheers
Tommy
Tommy
May 29, 2012, 6:22:06 PM5/29/12
to
"Tex" <twiz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f0has794hrjmdd0n1...@4ax.com...
and ex-wives....
Although I have no experience of ex-wife - if I had an ex, I think I'd want
to joke about her. In my imagination she'd be a long legged nympho biatch
who only was happy with her legs in the air.
Ahh sigh, :-))
Cheers
Tommy
mike
May 29, 2012, 6:49:58 PM5/29/12
to
replying or looking at those that have power over them use filters.
There are several people on this group I don't read. The scrollbar works
very nicely.
Tex
May 29, 2012, 6:52:51 PM5/29/12
to
off. I take it in the spirit you intended as a jokster... how do I
know that was the case __ I'm a mind reader ... and creator of half
the characters here __ if one were to believe the mentally ill.
Tex
May 29, 2012, 6:54:08 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:54:04 -0500, "Ted L." <Ted...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>In article <ibgas71hle21khvul...@4ax.com>,
> Tex <twiz...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I could filter people ... but I don't see the point. Others can filter
>> or not ... whatever suits them ... at least that is my personal take
>> on it.
>
>The point is that it saves the few clicks or key presses it would take
>to skip place and mark as read somebody you know you have no interest in
>reading. In my old age I'm getting very lazy.
I understand that one ... but I'm still young. :)
wrote:
>In article <ibgas71hle21khvul...@4ax.com>,
> Tex <twiz...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I could filter people ... but I don't see the point. Others can filter
>> or not ... whatever suits them ... at least that is my personal take
>> on it.
>
>The point is that it saves the few clicks or key presses it would take
>to skip place and mark as read somebody you know you have no interest in
>reading. In my old age I'm getting very lazy.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 7:00:17 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 3:49 PM, mike wrote:
>
> Filtering people is a form of self censorship.
Brilliant! What a mind.
>
> Filtering people is a form of self censorship.
> Those who can't refrain from replying or looking at those that have
> power over them use filters.
issues its the same old, same old, any flotation device in a storm for a
drowning ego.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 7:21:25 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 05:52 PM, Tex wrote:
>
> I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
> known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
> Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time& space with
> them.
I've got a gem of a wife now, but my 1st wife was & still is a fucking
>
> I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
> known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
> Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time& space with
> them.
bitch, but then again, I picked her...That doesn't say much about me.
In all fairness to the ex, she could have been a lot worse.....I guess.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 7:49:28 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 06:49 PM, mike wrote:
.
>
> Filtering people is a form of self censorship. Those who can't refrain from
> replying or looking at those that have power over them use filters.
Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
.
>
> Filtering people is a form of self censorship. Those who can't refrain from
> replying or looking at those that have power over them use filters.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 7:50:59 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 4:49 PM, Skeezix LaRocca wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 06:49 PM, mike wrote:
> .
>>
>> Filtering people is a form of self censorship. Those who can't refrain
>> from
>> replying or looking at those that have power over them use filters.
>
> Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
ROTFL
> On 05/29/2012 06:49 PM, mike wrote:
> .
>>
>> Filtering people is a form of self censorship. Those who can't refrain
>> from
>> replying or looking at those that have power over them use filters.
>
> Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
Fred Exley
May 29, 2012, 7:57:22 PM5/29/12
to
found me on Facebook. I was blown away. Needless to say, her looks are
long gone, but to me she will always be that thrilling, hot piece of ass
of long ago...
Ted L.
May 29, 2012, 8:00:08 PM5/29/12
to
In article
<279055239360024419.112163...@reader.albasani.net
>,
I'm going to put them in my killfile if I don't have one?
<279055239360024419.112163...@reader.albasani.net
>,
mike <into.act...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are several people on this group I don't read. The scrollbar works
> very nicely.
Not really. Filters are much better. Besides, how can I tell somebody
> There are several people on this group I don't read. The scrollbar works
> very nicely.
I'm going to put them in my killfile if I don't have one?
Mark Warner
May 29, 2012, 8:59:25 PM5/29/12
to
Tex wrote:
>
> I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
> known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
> Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time & space with
> them.
Barf.
>
> I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
> known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
> Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time & space with
> them.
--
Mark Warner
MEPIS Linux
Registered Linux User #415318
...lose .inhibitions when replying
Message has been deleted
Tex
May 29, 2012, 9:05:08 PM5/29/12
to
peoples reasons ... just my own __ which happens to be I don't see a
point in it.
Remember I'm not god __ merely a clone. Hah ha!
Message has been deleted
Tex
May 29, 2012, 9:06:36 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:00:17 -0700, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net>
wrote:
>On 5/29/2012 3:49 PM, mike wrote:
>
>>
>> Filtering people is a form of self censorship.
>
>Brilliant! What a mind.
Can you hold back on the praise __ he needs ego deflation not pats on
the back! :)
wrote:
>On 5/29/2012 3:49 PM, mike wrote:
>
>>
>> Filtering people is a form of self censorship.
>
>Brilliant! What a mind.
the back! :)
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Tex
May 29, 2012, 9:10:54 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 19:57:22 -0400, Fred Exley
to grow into it. But I agree experience can make a difference. Like
LaRocca I've had a few cheerleaders, but it has always been 20,30, 40
years after they lead their last cheer.
<webm...@araa2008.gohsphere.com> wrote:
>This week an old girlfriend I hadn't seen or heard from since *1970*
>found me on Facebook. I was blown away. Needless to say, her looks are
>long gone, but to me she will always be that thrilling, hot piece of ass
>of long ago...
One of the reasons I was fortunate to be born ugly ... I didn't have
>This week an old girlfriend I hadn't seen or heard from since *1970*
>found me on Facebook. I was blown away. Needless to say, her looks are
>long gone, but to me she will always be that thrilling, hot piece of ass
>of long ago...
to grow into it. But I agree experience can make a difference. Like
LaRocca I've had a few cheerleaders, but it has always been 20,30, 40
years after they lead their last cheer.
Tex
May 29, 2012, 9:16:17 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 20:59:25 -0400, Mark Warner
<mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Tex wrote:
>>
>> I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
>> known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
>> Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time & space with
>> them.
>
>Barf.
The boys went down to the dock to catch some pike ... I went on araa
<mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Tex wrote:
>>
>> I joke occasionally about both of my ex-wives ... but the truth be
>> known they were / still are beautiful women, both inside and out.
>> Someone such as myself was fortunate to share some time & space with
>> them.
>
>Barf.
and caught a puker.
Rob D.
May 29, 2012, 9:17:13 PM5/29/12
to
I'll do my best.
I suppose what bothers me most about him is that he CAN post
worthwhile stuff . . . that post about becoming a bartender was really
interesting, even if it was all a lie. Why WOULD it matter to anyone
in AAif he chose to do that, even if he WERE an active AA?
But instead of the interesting stuff he sometimes posts, he posts all
this other nonsense.
He's becoming predictable, too. mOne negative comment from me, and
we're back to "priests are child molesters."
Ah, well.
I probably won't filter, as the easiest thing is GG, but I'll try to
put him inmmy mental killfile.
Rob
Tex
May 29, 2012, 9:18:28 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 20:05:55 -0500, Gary <yex...@sbell.net> wrote:
>As I said just a minute ago, don't read what he posts. Pretty soon
>he'll be writing just for himself.
>No audience. Guess what?
My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>he'll be writing just for himself.
>No audience. Guess what?
My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
Sharx3335
May 29, 2012, 9:36:08 PM5/29/12
to
"Gary" <yex...@sbell.net> wrote in message
news:2012052920102243658-yexxxx@sbellnet...
> On 2012-05-30 00:00:08 +0000, "Ted L." <Ted...@yahoo.com> said:
>
>> In article
>> <279055239360024419.112163...@reader.albasani.net
>>> ,
>> mike <into.act...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are several people on this group I don't read. The
>>> scrollbar works
>>> very nicely.
>>
>> Not really. Filters are much better. Besides, how can I tell
>> somebody
>> I'm going to put them in my killfile if I don't have one?
>
> You can also be versatlie. You can both use filters and just not
>
>> In article
>> <279055239360024419.112163...@reader.albasani.net
>>> ,
>> mike <into.act...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are several people on this group I don't read. The
>>> scrollbar works
>>> very nicely.
>>
>> Not really. Filters are much better. Besides, how can I tell
>> somebody
>> I'm going to put them in my killfile if I don't have one?
>
> read posts from people who bore you.
> Together both.
>
politically correct definition of...
people who bore you=those who don't buy into YOUR bullshit?? <vbg>
Mark Warner
May 29, 2012, 9:44:27 PM5/29/12
to
Tex wrote:
>
> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>
> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
Skeezix LaRocca
May 29, 2012, 9:46:25 PM5/29/12
to
On 05/29/2012 09:05 PM, Tex wrote:
.
>
> Remember I'm not god __ merely a clone. Hah ha!
Yup, I never did understand that one...The Bible Thumpers say something
.
>
> Remember I'm not god __ merely a clone. Hah ha!
to the effect that God created man in his image...Well, no disrespect
intended, but if that is the case, he, she, or it is really fucked up.
Te.x
May 29, 2012, 9:48:16 PM5/29/12
to
I think it thould thay:
Thith week an old boyfriend I hadn't theen or heard from thinth *1970*
found me on Fathbook. I was blown..... Needlethth to thay, hith lookth
are long gone, but to me he will alwayth be that thrilling, hot pieth of
athth.
We thayed together them almotht at a whopping 9 dayth acthident-free.
That’th even more of a thuccethth that I hoped and dreamed. Longer than
a week!
And then it happened.
The puffy penith.
The penith of puff. The penith that in its thwelling reached its
zenith.
A zenith penith.
Or, in my thon’s very own words:
My penith wath feeling very hurting. It got puffier and puffier. I had
a puffy penith. The doctor thayth that there’th a bug bite that went
crazy and out of control! I had to get medithine for my penith. And
that’s my thtory and I'm thicking to it.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 9:51:38 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 6:01 PM, Gary wrote:
> I just don't read what he posts……is that too simple? Delete's are easy
Not with Thunderbird.
> I just don't read what he posts……is that too simple? Delete's are easy
Not with Thunderbird.
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 9:54:15 PM5/29/12
to
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 9:56:58 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 6:44 PM, Mark Warner wrote:
> Tex wrote:
>>
>> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
>> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>
> Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
This place is /crawling/ with shrinks.
> Tex wrote:
>>
>> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
>> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>
> Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
Dr. Frankie
Tex
May 29, 2012, 10:57:30 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 21:44:27 -0400, Mark Warner
<mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Tex wrote:
>>
>> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
>> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>
>Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
That's Frank he's the doc... and it's just a guess not a dx. But you
<mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Tex wrote:
>>
>> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
>> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>
>Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
are welcome all the same.
Tex
May 29, 2012, 10:58:33 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 21:46:25 -0400, Skeezix LaRocca
<fatl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 05/29/2012 09:05 PM, Tex wrote:
>.
>>
>> Remember I'm not god __ merely a clone. Hah ha!
>
>Yup, I never did understand that one...The Bible Thumpers say something
>to the effect that God created man in his image...Well, no disrespect
>intended, but if that is the case, he, she, or it is really fucked up.
Or explains why we are. :)
<fatl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 05/29/2012 09:05 PM, Tex wrote:
>.
>>
>> Remember I'm not god __ merely a clone. Hah ha!
>
>Yup, I never did understand that one...The Bible Thumpers say something
>to the effect that God created man in his image...Well, no disrespect
>intended, but if that is the case, he, she, or it is really fucked up.
Tex
May 29, 2012, 11:01:15 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 18:56:58 -0700, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net>
wrote:
Well there's lots of patients too.
Guess what? ... I did and I'm a doc ... had I known it was that easy I
would have become one years ago. :)
wrote:
Guess what? ... I did and I'm a doc ... had I known it was that easy I
would have become one years ago. :)
Groundhog
May 29, 2012, 11:27:51 PM5/29/12
to
--
mgh
~
groundhog mobile
Sharx3335
May 29, 2012, 11:33:34 PM5/29/12
to
"Te.x" <thwi...@hothmail.com> wrote in message
news:e1uas7566v0g74jng...@4ax.com...
He introduced himself, "I'm Thor!". Her reply? " I'm tho thore, I
can hardly pith!"
F.H.
May 29, 2012, 11:33:51 PM5/29/12
to
Sharx3335
May 29, 2012, 11:34:06 PM5/29/12
to
"F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:cvidnRJGwNm64FjS...@giganews.com...
Tex
May 29, 2012, 11:52:34 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 20:33:51 -0700, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net>
not greedy! :) As the song goes _ Star Fuckers _ Star Fuckers _ I
married Star Fuckers __ and I weren't no Star.....
wrote:
>On 5/29/2012 8:01 PM, Tex wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 18:56:58 -0700, "F.H."<connec...@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/29/2012 6:44 PM, Mark Warner wrote:
>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
>>>>> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
>>>
>>> This place is /crawling/ with shrinks.
>>>
>>> Dr. Frankie
>>>
>>
>> Well there's lots of patients too.
>>
>> Guess what? ... I did and I'm a doc ... had I known it was that easy I
>> would have become one years ago. :)
>
>You could have had more ex wives.
Hah ha! Maybe ... but even though I'm selfish and self-centered I'm
>On 5/29/2012 8:01 PM, Tex wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 18:56:58 -0700, "F.H."<connec...@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/29/2012 6:44 PM, Mark Warner wrote:
>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess is he's mentally ill and it doesn't matter if people reply or
>>>>> read his stuff __ he gets his thrill just writing it.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Dr. Fucking Phil.
>>>
>>> This place is /crawling/ with shrinks.
>>>
>>> Dr. Frankie
>>>
>>
>> Well there's lots of patients too.
>>
>> Guess what? ... I did and I'm a doc ... had I known it was that easy I
>> would have become one years ago. :)
>
>You could have had more ex wives.
not greedy! :) As the song goes _ Star Fuckers _ Star Fuckers _ I
married Star Fuckers __ and I weren't no Star.....
Skeezix LaRocca
May 30, 2012, 5:06:27 AM5/30/12
to
On 05/29/2012 10:58 PM, Tex wrote:
>
> Or explains why we are. :)
That might explain why a tornado can kill 20 people, but some choose to
>
> Or explains why we are. :)
focus on the 3 that lived, calling it a miracle, rather than luck.
Fred Exley
May 30, 2012, 8:33:57 AM5/30/12
to
Message has been deleted
Tommy
May 30, 2012, 2:34:11 PM5/30/12
to
"Tex" <twiz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ejsas79peir7g1pvo...@4ax.com...
Yeah like we don't want him to turn into an insufferable repetitious
thumping AA bore bawahahahaha
(Sorry Gar, I couldn't resist)
Cheers
Tommy
news:ejsas79peir7g1pvo...@4ax.com...
thumping AA bore bawahahahaha
(Sorry Gar, I couldn't resist)
Cheers
Tommy
Tommy
May 30, 2012, 2:46:40 PM5/30/12
to
"Rob D."
He's becoming predictable, too. mOne negative comment from me, and
we're back to "priests are child molesters."
Ah, well.
I probably won't filter, as the easiest thing is GG, but I'll try to
put him inmmy mental killfile.
Rob
You're probably too nice a guy for usenet Rob -
No need to explain that those sitting behind an anonymous keyboard can be a
superhero or a serial killer (and all things in between) in their own minds
I find it all to easy to get caught up, forgetting that it isnt real - none
of it is real.
I'm also blessed, in that I've met so many of our gang, and some of them
have met 'the others' - makes me feel I'm acquainted with their personality.
Its a terrible pity for the afflicted ones like Ex.. He could fit in and
whats more there are many here who would actually give him genuine help.
I've seen so many offers of help being extended, some even financial.
It makes me sad sometimes to see what is such a benefit to those w ho are
sick and incapacitated, who don't get out much, who may not be great mixers,
or who just can't afford much more than internet access - and to see it
being destroyed by scumbags with little else to do
Cheers
Tommy
He's becoming predictable, too. mOne negative comment from me, and
we're back to "priests are child molesters."
Ah, well.
I probably won't filter, as the easiest thing is GG, but I'll try to
put him inmmy mental killfile.
Rob
No need to explain that those sitting behind an anonymous keyboard can be a
superhero or a serial killer (and all things in between) in their own minds
I find it all to easy to get caught up, forgetting that it isnt real - none
of it is real.
I'm also blessed, in that I've met so many of our gang, and some of them
have met 'the others' - makes me feel I'm acquainted with their personality.
Its a terrible pity for the afflicted ones like Ex.. He could fit in and
whats more there are many here who would actually give him genuine help.
I've seen so many offers of help being extended, some even financial.
It makes me sad sometimes to see what is such a benefit to those w ho are
sick and incapacitated, who don't get out much, who may not be great mixers,
or who just can't afford much more than internet access - and to see it
being destroyed by scumbags with little else to do
Cheers
Tommy
Mark Warner
May 30, 2012, 4:42:38 PM5/30/12
to
Ted L. wrote:
> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>
>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>
> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works just
> fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
Thanks a-fucking-lot.
--
Mark Warner
...lose .inhibitions when replying
> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>
>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>
> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works just
> fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
Thanks a-fucking-lot.
--
Mark Warner
...lose .inhibitions when replying
Sister.Lyndi
May 30, 2012, 10:19:34 PM5/30/12
to
Mark Warner wrote:
> Ted L. wrote:
>> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>>
>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>>
>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works
>> just fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
>
> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
A quitcherbitchin. :-)
> Ted L. wrote:
>> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>>
>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>>
>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works
>> just fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
>
> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
he changes.
At least I assume he's a he. We've only ever had one woman behave like
that on a.r.aa and that was years ago.
S. Lyndi
>
Mark Warner
May 30, 2012, 10:31:48 PM5/30/12
to
Sister.Lyndi wrote:
> Mark Warner wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
> A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>
> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
> he changes.
Freaking noob. That would snag Tex and Fred Exley and who knows who else.
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
> A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>
> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
> he changes.
Ted H
May 30, 2012, 10:30:15 PM5/30/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 22:19:34 -0400,
Sister.Lyndi <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Warner wrote:
>> Ted L. wrote:
>>> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual
>>>> nym-shifting?
>>>
>>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it
>>> works just fine.
>>
Sister.Lyndi <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Warner wrote:
>> Ted L. wrote:
>>> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual
>>>> nym-shifting?
>>>
>>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it
>>> works just fine.
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
> A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>
> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
> what else he changes.
But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
>
> A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>
> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
> what else he changes.
Maybe that's not all bad. ;)
--
Ted H.
Fred Exley
May 30, 2012, 10:39:28 PM5/30/12
to
On 5/30/12 10:19 PM, Sister.Lyndi wrote:
> Mark Warner wrote:
>> Ted L. wrote:
>>> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>>>
>>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works
>>> just fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
> A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>
> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else he
> changes.
There goes me too then...
> Mark Warner wrote:
>> Ted L. wrote:
>>> In article Rob D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>>>
>>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works
>>> just fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
> A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>
> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else he
> changes.
Chronocidal Charlie
May 30, 2012, 10:45:56 PM5/30/12
to
Raining on 'nd off a tad. Feels good.
CC
Mark Warner
May 30, 2012, 11:09:28 PM5/30/12
to
Ted H wrote:
> Sister.Lyndi <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
>> what else he changes.
>
> But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
Nice girl. Not too bright sometimes.
>>
>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
>> what else he changes.
>
> But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
JimB
May 30, 2012, 11:12:19 PM5/30/12
to
--
JimB
Linux user#495581
Crosseyed And Painless - Big Bear Bad Ass
May 30, 2012, 11:16:36 PM5/30/12
to
"Mark Warner" <mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2o5n...@mid.individual.net...
~
mgh
Charlie M. 1958
May 30, 2012, 11:27:36 PM5/30/12
to
Crosseyed And Painless - Big Bear Bad Ass
May 30, 2012, 11:35:49 PM5/30/12
to
"Chronocidal Charlie" <c...@chronocidal-charlie.me> wrote in message
news:q6qdnWoV07PnRlvS...@giganews.com...
;)
Crisp and clear here - gonna go cause some local air pollution and have a
hot coco too on the deck. Spent the last couple days pounding the caffeine
to get local bud's site up. Still gotta integrate social networking
(Facebook Twitter Linked-in... egads! and Adwords plus additional SEO
content, sitemaps Analytics... yadayadayada)
~
peace
mgh
Crosseyed And Painless - Big Bear Bad Ass
May 30, 2012, 11:37:41 PM5/30/12
to
"Charlie M. 1958" <alw...@impatient.com> wrote in message
news:jq6of8$tq0$1...@dont-email.me...
I just happened to be there...and bit. :)
~
peace
mgh
Sharx3335
May 31, 2012, 12:29:39 AM5/31/12
to
"Sister.Lyndi" <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2o2pa...@mid.individual.net...
Groundhog
May 31, 2012, 12:43:50 AM5/31/12
to
Tex
May 31, 2012, 12:58:19 AM5/31/12
to
Tex
May 31, 2012, 12:59:24 AM5/31/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 23:09:28 -0400, Mark Warner
<mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Ted H wrote:
>> Sister.Lyndi <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
>>> what else he changes.
>>
>> But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
>
>Nice girl. Not too bright sometimes.
I was thinking pretty smart... actually.
<mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Ted H wrote:
>> Sister.Lyndi <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
>>> what else he changes.
>>
>> But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
>
>Nice girl. Not too bright sometimes.
dav...@agent.com
May 31, 2012, 1:33:39 AM5/31/12
to
"Sister.Lyndi" <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Mark Warner wrote:
>> Ted L. wrote:
>>> Rob D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>>>
>>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works
>>> just fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
>A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
>he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
He's Agent Orange:
>Mark Warner wrote:
>> Ted L. wrote:
>>> Rob D. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Think that would do any good, with his continual nym-shifting?
>>>
>>> I have a filter that keys on "Ex-AA" and nothing else and it works
>>> just fine. Now if everyone else wouldn't keep quoting him...
>>
>> Thanks a-fucking-lot.
>
>A quitcherbitchin. :-)
>I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
>he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
JoeRaisin
May 31, 2012, 8:25:41 AM5/31/12
to
On 5/29/2012 9:51 PM, F.H. wrote:
> On 5/29/2012 6:01 PM, Gary wrote:
>
>> I just don't read what he posts……is that too simple? Delete's are easy
>
> Not with Thunderbird.
Easy enough to avoid him when you want. Land on one of his posts and
> On 5/29/2012 6:01 PM, Gary wrote:
>
>> I just don't read what he posts……is that too simple? Delete's are easy
>
> Not with Thunderbird.
hit the 'T' key - before it's even done loading you are off to the next
thread.
Mark Warner
May 31, 2012, 9:58:12 AM5/31/12
to
dav...@agent.com wrote:
> "Sister.Lyndi" <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
>> he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
>
> He's Agent Orange:
> http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
No way. Orange may be a kook, but he's not mentally defective.
>>
>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
>> he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
>
> He's Agent Orange:
> http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
Sister.Lyndi
May 31, 2012, 11:03:02 AM5/31/12
to
Ted H wrote:
< S. Lyndi wrote"
to grasp what I'm telling it to do.
Next thing I know, it's going to start yelling "Feed me!" It'll be
"Little Shop of Horrors" all over again - 'cept with a computer.
S. Lyndi
< S. Lyndi wrote"
>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter
>> what else he changes.
>
> But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
Nope. Don't know why, but this latest Mozilla Seamonkey download, seems
>> what else he changes.
>
> But wouldn't that also filter out Tex?
to grasp what I'm telling it to do.
Next thing I know, it's going to start yelling "Feed me!" It'll be
"Little Shop of Horrors" all over again - 'cept with a computer.
S. Lyndi
F.H.
May 31, 2012, 12:27:19 PM5/31/12
to
to choose' by /choosing/ to spare myself the ramblings of nutbars.
Tommy
May 31, 2012, 2:28:54 PM5/31/12
to
"Mark Warner" <mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2pbnc...@mid.individual.net...
> dav...@agent.com wrote:
>> "Sister.Lyndi" <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
>>> he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
>>
>> He's Agent Orange:
>> http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
>
> No way. Orange may be a kook, but he's not mentally defective.
But doesn't one include the other
>> "Sister.Lyndi" <Sister...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what else
>>> he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
>>
>> He's Agent Orange:
>> http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
>
> No way. Orange may be a kook, but he's not mentally defective.
F.H.
May 31, 2012, 2:52:05 PM5/31/12
to
On 5/31/2012 11:28 AM, Tommy wrote:
> "Mark Warner" <mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> dav...@agent.com wrote:
Kooks /can/ be merely colorful..., eccentric. This place is crawling
with eccentrics but most of them (us) are just a little senile. :)
> "Mark Warner" <mhwarner.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> dav...@agent.com wrote:
>>> "Sister.Lyndi" wrote:
>>>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what
>>>> else he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
>>> He's Agent Orange:
>>> http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
>> No way. Orange may be a kook, but he's not mentally defective.
> But doesn't one include the other?
>>>> I just use ex in my filter. He seems to use that, no matter what
>>>> else he changes. At least I assume he's a he.
>>> He's Agent Orange:
>>> http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30377179/view/orange-photo.jpg
>> No way. Orange may be a kook, but he's not mentally defective.
Kooks /can/ be merely colorful..., eccentric. This place is crawling
with eccentrics but most of them (us) are just a little senile. :)
0 new messages