Dr.L is a fraud and her callers are fools!!
Animal4um
No they are not every guest, studio audience member or viewer of the Jerry
Springer show!
They are the sorry examples of the American talk show listeners who call Dr.L
to ask some stupuid question of a women who herself is a fraud!!
How do you people live day to day without a direct phone line to the gfood
doctor 24 hours a day?
This women should take a week or so off and get her head together before she
ruins any more lives. Open your eyes people and check out her past. Dr.Laura is
doing the same thing Jerry Springer does by putting on the air only callers who
she can make a fool of while making herself look like some kind of superior
human. This women has some very serious personal issues she needs to work on
and if you really listen to her you can hear that very odd gallows laugh which
has been associated directly to mental illness.
I feel much better now. Please people stop calling this women or taking her
advice like she is some moral expert. I can document a number times where she
has endorsed the telling of lies by some callers then told others a lie is a
lie and never the right thing to do ever!
RUS149104
>Who are the most pathetic people on earth?
>No they are not every guest, studio audience member or viewer of the Jerry
>Springer show!
well, duh!
only one exception to your statement - Jakthehmmr
R
GOSMG
she is powerful in a world full of lost, misguided fools. Thanks for your
input. By the way, this newsgroup, while open to anyone, has become primarily
a place for people who do not like Dr Laura to voice their frustration. She
has no doubt set herself up for a huge, tumble into insanity. Nice job
pointing out her wacko-cackle.
Keep up the good work.
SKBFP
>By the way, this newsgroup, while open to anyone, has become primarily
>a place for people who do not like Dr Laura to voice their frustration
True. Maybe another case of the very vocal minority getting all the attention?
Steve
Martha Hughes
Because Steve, you can call the "dr" (of physiology)'s show and kiss her
ass on radio!!! We have to vent somewhere, seeing that she doesn't have
the strength to broadcast anyone who disagrees with her!
SKBFP
>the strength to broadcast anyone who disagrees with her!
>
This is a good point. She doesn't take negative calls, or critisism. I guess
that is the ultimate way for her to say "hey don't take me seriously." I mean,
a lot of people don't think Jay Leno is funny, but he doesn't have them on the
show to criticize him. I mean it's almost like she gives herself the ultimate
put down by saying that her show is just "entertainment."
Even Ann Landers prints negative letters.
Steve
Dr. Charlie
>Path: nntp.service.ohio-state.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!portc02.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
>From: sk...@aol.com (SKBFP)
>Newsgroups: alt.radio.talk.dr-laura
>Subject: Re: Dr.L is a fraud and her callers are fools!!
>Lines: 13
>NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news.aol.com
>X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
>Date: 13 Feb 1999 21:54:37 GMT
>Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
>References: <36C5DF...@pacbell.net>
>Message-ID: <19990213165437...@ng-fv1.aol.com>
>Xref: nntp.service.ohio-state.edu alt.radio.talk.dr-laura:51632
DL does not see her show as just entertainment and she does expect people to
take her very seriously. Here is an excerpt from the Corpus Argumenti
Lauretti, you can read the entire CAL at
http://extra.newsguy.com/~satire/Corpus.htm
Laurette Argument #12 She's just an entertainer.
Tell that to her. She believes that she is bringing about a
rebirth of morals and values to save a decadent society. These
are some of the statements she has made in interviews: "I
ran downstairs," she says "and yelled, 'Lew, I'm a priest and
my mission is to help God perfect the world!" [Joannie
M. Schrof, "No Whining" U.S. News and World Report, ] "'I am a
prophet,' she proclaims with unapologetic grandiosity, "'This
is a very serious show." and "I want to make an impression. I
have to get people's lives on track. I am a prophet. A prophet
takes a big metal spoon and hits the pan: Hello! I'm here!"
[Janet Wiscombe, "I Don't Do Therapy." Los Angeles Times
Magazine January 18, 1998.] (Dr. Laura later denied having said
she was a prophet, but Wiscombe insists that she did say it
*twice.* See the Bennetts article) "In front of her new
California Mission-style house [in] an exclusive gated
community in the San Fernando Valley, her husband has placed a
sign that alludes to Schlessinger's lofty goals: ON A MISSION,
it says. 'I am getting people to stop doing wrong and start
doing right,' she says." [Leslie Bennetts, Vanity Fair
September 1998.] "Those who create works for public consumption
have a responsibility for the content and the intent. I don't
think it's fair to try to deny that influence by hiding behind
the label "entertainment." [Dr. Laura quoted at
http://www.tvgen.com/tv/magazine/970825/ftr2a.sml] At the
0:32:18 point in the January 26, 1999 broadcast of her show Dr.
Laura said, "...I try to do something on this show. It's not
entertainment. It's not a radio show to me. It's an attempt to
try to help improve things for people in the world, and to do
that you have to live it. We can't say we're going to talk it
and not live it..." You can listen to this statement via Real
Audio at the following website:
http://www.broadcast.com/premrad/shows/drlaura.stm
--
St. Dr. Charlie BsD, ABD
Lord of Guile
Pope and Founder of the 1HASCCoSTotI
The Official Sharpe One of ARTD-L
High Councillor of the New Usenet Order
Grand Inquisitor, STTMI
Master Baiter
Master of Language
Master of the Logical Argument
Psychic Vampire
Maddi's Goon Squad, Special Flying Division
Order of the Cantankerous Canine Cross
Order of the Shifting Residence
The Enemy on Both Sides
A Man of Many Wiles
The Big Cat
Another Shallow Creep
Order of the ILK
Owner of a Super-Inflated Ego
Owner of an Unbelievable Memory
Obviously Superior
Martha Hughes
>
> > We have to vent somewhere, seeing that she doesn't have
> >the strength to broadcast anyone who disagrees with her!
> >
>
> This is a good point. She doesn't take negative calls, or critisism. I guess
> that is the ultimate way for her to say "hey don't take me seriously." I mean,
> a lot of people don't think Jay Leno is funny, but he doesn't have them on the
> show to criticize him. I mean it's almost like she gives herself the ultimate
> put down by saying that her show is just "entertainment."
> Even Ann Landers prints negative letters.
>
Have you ever heard her show???? It doesn't sound like it. She takes
herself VERY seriously. In a recent interview with Good Housekeeping she
called herself a prophet!!! Mohammed was a profit...she's a media whore.
SKBFP
>herself VERY seriously.
Again so does Jerry Springer, and I consider that "entertainment." Kind of...I
guess...well..some people do anyway...
Steve
Waay2spike
This is incorrect. I've read numerous interviews of Springer, and he doesn't
take himself seriously at all. He might defend his show, but he calls it as
serious as pro wrestling.
Gary
Jakthehmmr
A reported 60,000 callers a day try to reach Dr. Laura.......20 million a week
listen to her.......maybe they see something you don't..........
>Who are the most pathetic people on earth?
>No they are not every guest, studio audience member or viewer of the Jerry
>Springer show!
Jakthehmmr
Awww Bullshit!!................
>>Ref: Mean ole Dr. Laura...
>>
>>This is a mean woman! She praises things like,
>>...discipline and rules...and standards. Will she
>>never stop. This is the day of "..you're O.K...I'm O.K.
>>...anything goes!
>>
>>What's with this woman suggesting some kind of
>>moral standards...absurd thing going on here.
>>
>>Let us all make fun of her...attack the messenger...
>>sounds like a plan to me. Let's compare her to let's
>>see: Maybe Jerry Springer...or suggest mental illness.
>>
>>We'll show her...talking about standards, morals.
>>This stuff has got to go. We don't want none of dat
>>stuff!
>>
>>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>>not popular right now. She is going to have stop it
>>now, or we'll really smear her. She just doesn't know
>>how to stay with what is popular...the fads you know!
>>All that old stuff she talks about...really weird.
>>
>>Mean, mean ole Dr. Laura...standards, discipline,
>>rules, morals....when will she drag up more of these
>>skeletons. It makes me uncomfortable...she has got
>>to go.
>>
>>Leonard...
>
>You didn't refer to any of the actual criticisms of Dr. Laura. You also seem
>to buy into this fallacy that the un-doctor invented discipline and morals.
>That's giving her way too much credit. Lots of people profess the importance
>of discipline and morals (like clergymen, for example. So who needs Laura
>anyway?), but they are not hated. Dr. Laura, who lacks morals herself, draws
>ire because she is... everybody now: A fraud, and her callers are fools.
>
sison
only fool. Listen to yourself.
"I can't belive she wants us to have rules and discipline???"
And what do you mean by "this is a worl of I am okay, you're
okay...anything goes?" Where have you been? DId you ever hear of
Matthew Sheapard? Did you know that he was gay? And he was killed?
Does he have the right to be gay? Certainly. Do we have a right to
kill him for that? or anybody for that matter? Of course not. But
that is what stupid people that don't have rules and don't have
discipline do. They don't know where to stop, and they don't know that
thier actions don't simply reflect their own lives. It affects
everyone around them. There is never one victom, no matter what the
crime.
So, what is wrong with a couple rules? What is wrong with morality?
What is wrong with Dr. Laura telling the world that it there is more
damage done than good when twop people live together before marriage?
(You can see that from simple statistics). But that is too hard, isn't
it? that is no fun, is it?
I think you're just selfish.
--
Posted via Talkway - http://www.talkway.com
Surf Usenet at home, on the road, and by email -- always at Talkway.
EMF1947
>Date: Sun, Feb 14, 1999 5:00 PM
>Message-id: <36c7608...@netnews.att.net>
>
>
>Ref: Mean ole Dr. Laura...
>
>This is a mean woman! She praises things like,
>...discipline and rules...and standards. Will she
>never stop. This is the day of "..you're O.K...I'm O.K.
She praises them, sure. It is not too clear to a lot of us that she practices
them. For instance, she talks about the rule against gossip, and then
described a person who interviewed her as obese and jealous. I for one admire
people who have standards more than I admire people who praise them.
>What's with this woman suggesting some kind of
>moral standards...absurd thing going on here.
>
>Let us all make fun of her...attack the messenger...
>sounds like a plan to me. Let's compare her to let's
>see: Maybe Jerry Springer...or suggest mental illness.
>
I don't know about making fun of her, but I like the idea of a rational
discussion of her suitability as a messenger, one that adduces evidence. Come
to think of it, alot of that discussion goes on here in this ng, in between
bits of sarcasm.
>We'll show her...talking about standards, morals.
>This stuff has got to go. We don't want none of dat
>stuff!
>
>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>not popular right now.
>She is going to have stop it
>now, or we'll really smear her. She just doesn't know
>how to stay with what is popular...the fads you know!
>All that old stuff she talks about...really weird.
Actually, she seems to do a good job of staying with what is popular to me.
Pretending to be in a persecuted minority of moralists looks to me to be quite
popular at present. Not only DL, but Jerry Falwell, Jim Dobson, William
Bennett, and John Rosemund have become very popular taking this tack. In fact,
I'd say DL is a bit of a latecomer.
Ellen
Dr. Charlie
emf...@aol.com (EMF1947) writes:
>>From: lcw...@worldnet.att.net (Leonard)
>>What's with this woman suggesting some kind of
>>moral standards...absurd thing going on here.
<snip>
>>Let us all make fun of her...attack the messenger...
>>sounds like a plan to me. Let's compare her to let's
>>see: Maybe Jerry Springer...or suggest mental illness.
>I don't know about making fun of her, <snip>
It's an act of religious devotion for some, you know.
>>We'll show her...talking about standards, morals.
>>This stuff has got to go. We don't want none of dat
>>stuff!
I'm going to have to rewrite Laurette Argument #2 and give it more attention
in the next revision of the CAL since J_k and Leonard have dusted it off and
made such dramatic (but barely articulate) rhetorical flourishes with it.
>>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>>not popular right now.
>>She is going to have stop it
>>now, or we'll really smear her. She just doesn't know
>>how to stay with what is popular...the fads you know!
>>All that old stuff she talks about...really weird.
>Actually, she seems to do a good job of staying with what is popular to me.
>Pretending to be in a persecuted minority of moralists looks to me to be quite
>popular at present. Not only DL, but Jerry Falwell, Jim Dobson, William
>Bennett, and John Rosemund have become very popular taking this tack. In fact,
>I'd say DL is a bit of a latecomer.
What? You mean DL is just jumping on someone else's bandwagon? Why Ellen, that
might suggest a lack of originality and <gasp> sincerity!
Dr. Charlie
Firm believer in religion and the promotion of religious values
Diane B
" WELCOME TO MY HOME"
Enter Quick Reply Here
Jakthehmmr
>I'm sorry people but morals and values don't come from a talk show
>host.
We really don't get "morals" from anywhere nowadays so who cares where they
come from??
Some of the people that call really need prayer more than
>"advice".
And what will "prayer" do?
She really should lead people to God instead of give her
>opinions, after all He is the only one who can change a persons heart.
But he doesn't kick much ass when its needed...........
>One of my gripes is her language on the radio. I heard her telling
>someone on Friday that she had told her son something but not in a
>vulgar language.
When speaking to savages, you speak in their tongue..............
Well if the language she uses is not appropriate for
>her dinner table talk, the think about all the kids who listen in. Have
>the same respect for someone elses kids.
>
To hell with the little brats........They'll learn worse from our illustrious
"Public Education" System..........
deepn...@my-dejanews.com
"sison" <si...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I hope that message is complete sarcasim, bacaseu if not, you are the
> only fool. Listen to yourself.
> "I can't belive she wants us to have rules and discipline???"
> And what do you mean by "this is a worl of I am okay, you're
> okay...anything goes?" Where have you been? DId you ever hear of
> Matthew Sheapard? Did you know that he was gay? And he was killed?
> Does he have the right to be gay? Certainly. Do we have a right to
> kill him for that? or anybody for that matter? Of course not. But
> that is what stupid people that don't have rules and don't have
> discipline do. They don't know where to stop, and they don't know that
> thier actions don't simply reflect their own lives. It affects
> everyone around them. There is never one victom, no matter what the
> crime.
If you'll expand your view a little and delve into history, you'll
see that 'rules and discipline' and morality have a love/hate relationship.
Also, in Doktor Laura's worldview there is always one victim of a crime
(not counting children). Her compassion extends no farther than that.
The Dali Lama could teach her a few things.
> So, what is wrong with a couple rules? What is wrong with morality?
> What is wrong with Dr. Laura telling the world that it there is more
> damage done than good when twop people live together before marriage?
> (You can see that from simple statistics). But that is too hard, isn't
> it? that is no fun, is it?
Those 'simple-statistics' mean little. Half of them prove premarital
cohabitation is benefical, and the other half prove it isn't.
People like Doktor Laura recklessly use statistics for their own benefit.
> I think you're just selfish.
But a little less selfish than Doktor Laura.
--deepneptune
~~Moving at the Speed of Dark~~
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Diane B
Jay Wheeler
want to listen to someone like Dr. Laura. She made her mistakes and
hopefully is repentent now, and if so God forgives her. So what church
do you belong to ? I know God exists if we were evolved from monkeys we
would certainly be acting alot worse than we are now. "
Martha Hughes
>
> Hey Jak i imagine you are not a believer in God. If not why would you
> want to listen to someone like Dr. Laura. She made her mistakes and
> hopefully is repentent now, and if so God forgives her. So what church
> do you belong to ? I know God exists if we were evolved from monkeys we
> would certainly be acting alot worse than we are now.
>
uh ho...here's the evolution from monkey bullshit you xians shove on us,
logic and scientific evidence be damned!
I don't believe in a god...so I find my own salvation through my own
acceptance of myself. I don't rely on an old book of fiction to tell me
what to do. There is few scientific evidence for the stories in the
bible.
Jakthehmmr
>Hey Jak i imagine you are not a believer in God. If not why would you
>want to listen to someone like Dr. Laura. She made her mistakes and
>hopefully is repentent now, and if so God forgives her. So what church
>do you belong to ? I know God exists if we were evolved from monkeys we
>would certainly be acting alot worse than we are now.
>
After reading this ng, I get the feeling that the Monkeys NEVER
"evolved"............
Jay Wheeler
Jakthehmmr wrote in message
<19990216010319...@ng-fd1.aol.com>...
> omp...@webtv.net (Diane B) wrote:
>
>
>After reading this ng, I get the feeling that the Monkeys NEVER
>"evolved"............
Correct. Modern day monkeys already HAVE evolved, and will continue to do
so. Although I don't know how you picked that information off this
newsgroup. ;-)
-Jay W.
Jakthehmmr
Eric, da Red
Leonard <lcw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>Ref: Mean ole Dr. Laura...
>
>This is a mean woman! She praises things like,
>...discipline and rules...and standards.
Any idiot can do this, many idiots do.
>Will she
>never stop. This is the day of "..you're O.K...I'm O.K.
>...anything goes!
If the only two choices were (a) Doktor Laura's morality, and (b) no
morality, you would have a point.
They aren't, and you don't.
>What's with this woman suggesting some kind of
>moral standards...absurd thing going on here.
Can we take it that you see nothing wrong with equating living in a
co-ed dorm with murder, or suggesting to a child that their stepfather
wants to molest her?
Interesting morality you have there, bub.
>Let us all make fun of her...attack the messenger...
>sounds like a plan to me. Let's compare her to let's
>see: Maybe Jerry Springer...or suggest mental illness.
Both are fair observations, given her behavior and the style of her
show.
>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>not popular right now.
Where isn't discipline popular? Please be specific.
>Mean, mean ole Dr. Laura...standards, discipline,
>rules, morals....when will she drag up more of these
>skeletons. It makes me uncomfortable...she has got
>to go.
Just keep avoiding the obvious while you chant "discipline,
discipline, discipline ..."
--
Usenet Dialogue Of The Week:
A: ... correct me if I am wrong...
P: Geez, who has the time?
Ted Krueger
Eric, da Red <berg...@bigger.aa.net> wrote:
>In article <36c7608...@netnews.att.net>,
>Leonard <lcw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>>not popular right now.
>Where isn't discipline popular? Please be specific.
The Oval Office.
Ted the cruel
Otis booster
--
"It is indeed the case that Sen. Trent Lott and Rep. Bob Barr have made a
practice of addressing a group focused on white self-interest and white power.
One day, if this kind of thing spreads, we may have a Congressional Black
Caucus." - The Week, NR, 2/8/99, p. 9. kru...@neta.com
SKBFP
>Date: 2/16/99 11:42 AM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <7ac752$dt4$1...@trojan.neta.com>
>
>In article <7ac66u$5rq$1...@bigger.aa.net>,
>Eric, da Red <berg...@bigger.aa.net> wrote:
>>In article <36c7608...@netnews.att.net>,
>>Leonard <lcw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>>>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>>>not popular right now.
>
>>Where isn't discipline popular? Please be specific.
>
>The Oval Office.
>
>Ted the cruel
>Otis booster
>
>--
Now THAT'S FUNNY!!!!
Maybe discipline isn't popular, but spanking proly is!
Steve
TJ
"Eric, da Red" wrote:
>
> In article <36c7608...@netnews.att.net>,
> Leonard <lcw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
<snip>
>
> >Mean, mean ole Dr. Laura...standards, discipline,
> >rules, morals....when will she drag up more of these
> >skeletons. It makes me uncomfortable...she has got
> >to go.
>
> Just keep avoiding the obvious while you chant "discipline,
> discipline, discipline ..."
I hope this doesn't bring out the fuzzy handcuff set.
--
TJ
Dr. Charlie
sk...@aol.com (SKBFP) writes:
>>From: kru...@trojan.neta.com (Ted Krueger)
>>In article <7ac66u$5rq$1...@bigger.aa.net>,
>>Eric, da Red <berg...@bigger.aa.net> wrote:
>>>In article <36c7608...@netnews.att.net>,
>>>Leonard <lcw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>not popular right now.
>>
>>>Where isn't discipline popular? Please be specific.
>>
>>The Oval Office.
>Now THAT'S FUNNY!!!!
Sorry, Steve, but you don't have any qualifications for deciding what's funny
on this newsgroup.
Dr. Charlie
SKBFP
>Sorry, Steve, but you don't have any qualifications for deciding what's funny
>
>on this newsgroup.
>
>
>Dr. Charlie
>
Sorry, I must have missed that in the FAQ. The next time I see a post that is
funny, I will resist the urge to laugh, or to compliment the poster until I am
told that I may do so by the Dr.(since apparently the good Dr. speaks for the
entire group).
BTW, what exactly are the qualifications? I can only hope that in my lifetime
I may be able to earn them, at which point I will really have lived.
Steve
ccdrogan
>Diane B wrote:
>>
>> Hey Jak i imagine you are not a believer in God. If not why would you
>> want to listen to someone like Dr. Laura. She made her mistakes and
>> hopefully is repentent now, and if so God forgives her. So what church
>> do you belong to ? I know God exists if we were evolved from monkeys we
>> would certainly be acting alot worse than we are now.
>>
>
>uh ho...here's the evolution from monkey bullshit you xians shove on us,
>logic and scientific evidence be damned!
I actually find evolution and creation fit perfectly together... some
just don't want to see it. (If interested I will explain how they fit)
Waay2spike
>>>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>>>not popular right now.
>
>>Where isn't discipline popular? Please be specific.
>
>The Oval Office.
>
Very clever Ted! However, who says Hillary didn't INSTRUCT Bill to be so
naughty.
Gary
My new Sig:
Is it just me, or is the Right Wing getting kookier by the day??
ARTD-L Faq:
http://extra.newsguy.com/~satire/faq.html
AND
http://extra.newsguy.com/~satire/Corpus.htm
----------------------------------------------
Jerry
Jakthehmmr wrote in message <19990213200117...@ng128.aol.com>...
> anim...@aol.com (Animal4um) wrote:
>
>A reported 60,000 callers a day try to reach Dr. Laura.......20 million a
week
>listen to her.......maybe they see something you don't..........
Finally we are quantifying the stupidity in this country.
Jerry
Dr. Charlie
sk...@aol.com (SKBFP) writes:
>Dr. Charlie wrote:
>>Sorry, Steve, but you don't have any qualifications for deciding what's funny
>>
>>on this newsgroup.
>>
>>
>>Dr. Charlie
>>
>Sorry, I must have missed that in the FAQ. The next time I see a post that is
>funny, I will resist the urge to laugh, or to compliment the poster until I am
>told that I may do so by the Dr.(since apparently the good Dr. speaks for the
>entire group).
*Sigh* I'm feeling a bit jaded with this sort of thing. There's no challenge
to it anymore.
>BTW, what exactly are the qualifications? I can only hope that in my lifetime
>I may be able to earn them, at which point I will really have lived.
We have an official newsgroup expert who decides what is funny and, more
importantly, what is not, here. Unfortunately she is ABEND. Some of us Jackals
have been taking turns filling in during her absence.
Dr. Charlie
You haven't really lived until you've been Pope
bigdl...@my-dejanews.com
tzomp...@mindless.com (Dr. Charlie) wrote:
> In article <19990216153404...@ng113.aol.com>
> sk...@aol.com (SKBFP) writes:
> >Now THAT'S FUNNY!!!!
>
> Sorry, Steve, but you don't have any qualifications for deciding what's funny
> on this newsgroup.
He probably laughs at B.C. and Mallard Fillmore.
GISP
(Who sometimes laughs at Tom Tomorrow)
Ted Krueger
SKBFP <sk...@aol.com> wrote:
>Dr. Charlie wrote:
>>Sorry, Steve, but you don't have any qualifications for deciding what's funny
>>on this newsgroup.
>Sorry, I must have missed that in the FAQ. The next time I see a post that is
>funny, I will resist the urge to laugh, or to compliment the poster until I am
>told that I may do so by the Dr.(since apparently the good Dr. speaks for the
>entire group).
>BTW, what exactly are the qualifications? I can only hope that in my lifetime
>I may be able to earn them, at which point I will really have lived.
Steve, Charlie is commenting in reference about one of the infamous
Pack o' Jackyls who has recently disappeared from our ranks. Maddi
was the acknowledged expert on "what is funny, and more importantly
what is not."
By all means, feel free to laugh, but not to judge what is funny on
this NG, that is Maddi's job, and no one has yet displayed the
qualifications to take her place.
Ted the cruel
Otis booster
--
Ted Krueger
>>>>Then she brings on this discipline gab...that, is just
>>>>not popular right now.
>>>Where isn't discipline popular? Please be specific.
>>The Oval Office.
>Very clever Ted! However, who says Hillary didn't INSTRUCT Bill to be so
>naughty.
I'm just going on the evidence at hand. I'm assuming that someone who
throws lamps at her hubby and complains that "I need to be f*ucked more
than once a year!" is none too happy with him.
SKBFP
>Steve, Charlie is commenting in reference about one of the infamous
>Pack o' Jackyls who has recently disappeared from our ranks.
Ok, now I get it. Maddi must have been gone before I got here.
Thanks.
Steve
Waay2spike
>
>>Very clever Ted! However, who says Hillary didn't INSTRUCT Bill to be so
>>naughty.
>
>I'm just going on the evidence at hand. I'm assuming that someone who
>throws lamps at her hubby and complains that "I need to be f*ucked more
>than once a year!" is none too happy with him.
LOL... where do you guys get this stuff??
Jakthehmmr
>Ted wrote:
>
>>
>>>Very clever Ted! However, who says Hillary didn't INSTRUCT Bill to be so
>>>naughty.
>>
>>I'm just going on the evidence at hand. I'm assuming that someone who
>>throws lamps at her hubby and complains that "I need to be f*ucked more
>>than once a year!" is none too happy with him.
>
>LOL... where do you guys get this stuff??
I still like the TV shot of the Slimebag when he was called back from the
Martha's Vineyard retreat to bomb the Aspirin Factory........Didja notice the
bruise under one eye?
Ted Krueger
Yep, she has been conspicuous in her absence for about a month and a
half now.
Ted the cruel
Otis booster
Classic, sick, bitter newsgroup resident
Ted Krueger
>>>Very clever Ted! However, who says Hillary didn't INSTRUCT Bill to be so
>>>naughty.
>>I'm just going on the evidence at hand. I'm assuming that someone who
>>throws lamps at her hubby and complains that "I need to be f*ucked more
>>than once a year!" is none too happy with him.
>LOL... where do you guys get this stuff??
From the President's personal bodyguards, first at the governor's mansion
in Little Rock, then at the White House.
StGer...@my-dejanews.com
Diane B
Enter Quick Reply Here
Diane B
Your Name
>
> In article <7adokl$nsh$1...@eve.enteract.com>,
> "Jerry" <ger...@enteract.com> wrote:
> >
> > Jakthehmmr wrote in message <19990213200117...@ng128.aol.com>...
> > > anim...@aol.com (Animal4um) wrote:
> > >
> > >A reported 60,000 callers a day try to reach Dr. Laura.......20 million a
> > week
> > >listen to her.......maybe they see something you don't..........
> >
> > Finally we are quantifying the stupidity in this country.
> > Jerry
> >
>
> "Dr. Laura for Dummies"
Do you really need "for Dummies"?
Jakthehmmr
Your Name
I've met sunfish that put up a better fight than you. What a loser.