Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Nemo's "Gacy" Interview a Sham

11 views
Skip to first unread message

COL. BILL KILGORE

unread,
Nov 15, 2003, 5:21:04 PM11/15/03
to
Message 1 in thread
From: Discovery_Eagle (discove...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Attention Mister Charles Nemo


View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell
Date: 2003-08-08 10:32:55 PST


Charles could you please tell more about your meetings with John Wayne
Gacey? Perhaps you could offer a few more anecdotes and details beyond
what was posted here on this newsgroup recently, I'm sure that all
would find it very interesting.

Did you visit him at Menard or Stateville or both?

I ask because the visitation records are available through Ursus and
they are quite extensive for the years 1993-94. Not only are the names
and ages of the visitor are listed, there are even photocopied
driver's licenses and state I.D.'s attached to A "reason for visit"
page, along with occupation and address as well as a brief section of
notes on each visitor with comments from the Officer on Duty.

I have segregated, his visitors into three groups, Family / Council /
Clergy / Other, in the "other" Category, there are 6 individuals, 4 of
them were women in their mid 50's to late 60's and of the other two,
one was 24 year old female that he granted an interview to and the
only other make was there to make Funerary arangments.

There were NO visits from a male and two females *EVER* made to John
Wayne Gacey in the years 1993 or 1994.

Please tell us a little more about your excusions to visit with Gacey.


D E
Langley VA.


You were challenged repeatedly in this thread to answer to question
Chuckles. You never responded. Once again, the proven liar. John
Wayne Gacy, indeed!

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 15, 2003, 6:09:43 PM11/15/03
to
"COL. BILL KILGORE" bil...@yahoo.com whined:

I doubt that "Ursus" even exists. Nevertheless, those who've been there know
it's true.

Charles Nemo
http://members.aol.com/ChasNemo/index.html
"Nemo is the Wal-Mart of the dark side, the one-stop superstore for everything
ugly, from Satanism to Nazi occultism to serial killers."
~Forbidden Internet Magazine #1 (May 2001)


TheLoneRanger100

unread,
Nov 15, 2003, 8:10:18 PM11/15/03
to
chas...@aol.comnojunk (Charles Nemo) puked in message:

>"COL. BILL KILGORE" bil...@yahoo.com spoke authoritatively:

We know you've been to "Anus", Knuckles.....Have you ever been anywhere
else?..........


Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 15, 2003, 8:20:14 PM11/15/03
to
theloner...@aol.com (TheLoneRanger100) whined:

You don't know jack shit, Jakazz. Neither does yer sock puppet poseur boi
Kilgore.

COL. BILL KILGORE

unread,
Nov 16, 2003, 11:53:38 AM11/16/03
to

Charles Nemo wrote:

The "proof is in the pudding" as they say; and you have neither, you sick whore.
Your reputation as Usenet's "premier liar" is still intact.

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 16, 2003, 12:19:55 PM11/16/03
to

I have both but choose not to waste my time on military poseurs.

>Your reputation as Usenet's "premier liar" is still intact.

Wrong again, poseur boi. I simply chose not to respond to time wasters.
Nothing I've said has ever been proven false, and everything I've said remains
as the gospel truth.

You, on the other hand, have been "outed" thoroughly by Scott Smith and many
others as a total fraud. You've been caught redhanded in lies time after time,
e.g., your alleged "military 401(K)", your alleged "five figure military
pension", and your repeated claim that anyone could find you on ordinary
databases (contradicted by your later claim that your records are concealed for
security purposes).

You're a 100% joke, margarine boi. Everyone knows you're the cheap, fake
spread.

COL. BILL KILGORE

unread,
Nov 16, 2003, 8:38:00 PM11/16/03
to

Charles Nemo wrote:

How conveniant. One of your biggest so-called Internet "pieces" and you don't have
time to answer legitimate questions about it.

>
> Nothing I've said has ever been proven false,

Research into your Gacy claims has at a bare minimum shown that Gacy had NO
visitors fitting your description under the scenario you presented.. Since you
refuse (or are unable) to provide any documentation other than your "word" to
back-up your claim, the lack of physical evidence outweighs your "word".

> and everything I've said remains
> as the gospel truth.

You are a proven liar, plain and simple.

>

>
>
> You, on the other hand, have been "outed" thoroughly by Scott Smith and many
> others as a total fraud.

Scott Smith is a liar at worst and a poor researcher at best. His so-called
"evidence" is nothing more than his "words", much like your style. An example is
his latest post claiming that he recived a phone call from the records section in
St. Louis. That agency does not make personal phone calls regarding record
verification, and it takes nearly 4-6 months to even receive written confirmation
of a records request. Smith purports to have accomplished all these things in a
matter of days. He is nothing more tha a fraud, just like you.

> You've been caught redhanded in lies time after time,
> e.g., your alleged "military 401(K)",

Thousands if not millions of military members have 401k's.

> your alleged "five figure military
> pension",

As I recently posted, a "five figure" pension could be anything between $10,000 and
$99,999. I'm at the extreme high-end of that spectrum, the fact that you and some
of your ilk can't differentiate between 5 digits and 6 digits notwithstanding.

> and your repeated claim that anyone could find you on ordinary
> databases (contradicted by your later claim that your records are concealed for
> security purposes).
>
> You're a 100% joke, margarine boi. Everyone knows you're the cheap, fake
> spread.

One only has to do a brief review of your posting history to realize that your
reputation as one of Usenet's most pathetic clowns stretches far and wide.

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 17, 2003, 7:56:15 AM11/17/03
to

They're not "legitimate" questions.

>> Nothing I've said has ever been proven false,
>
>Research into your Gacy claims has at a bare minimum shown that Gacy had NO
>visitors fitting your description under the scenario you presented.. Since
>you
>refuse (or are unable) to provide any documentation other than your "word" to
>back-up your claim, the lack of physical evidence outweighs your "word".
>
>> and everything I've said remains
>> as the gospel truth.
>
>You are a proven liar, plain and simple.

Not at all. Plain and simple.

>> You, on the other hand, have been "outed" thoroughly by Scott Smith and
>many
>> others as a total fraud.
>
>Scott Smith is a liar at worst and a poor researcher at best. His so-called
>"evidence" is nothing more than his "words", much like your style. An example
>is
>his latest post claiming that he recived a phone call from the records
>section in
>St. Louis. That agency does not make personal phone calls regarding record
>verification, and it takes nearly 4-6 months to even receive written
>confirmation
>of a records request. Smith purports to have accomplished all these things
>in a
>matter of days. He is nothing more tha a fraud, just like you.

His record is much more authentic than yours, which is zero. I have all
details.

>> You've been caught redhanded in lies time after time,
>> e.g., your alleged "military 401(K)",
>
>Thousands if not millions of military members have 401k's.

Prove it.

>> your alleged "five figure military
>> pension",
>
>As I recently posted, a "five figure" pension could be anything between
>$10,000 and
>$99,999. I'm at the extreme high-end of that spectrum, the fact that you and
>some
>of your ilk can't differentiate between 5 digits and 6 digits
>notwithstanding.

Actually, your claim was to a five figure MONTHLY military pension, which would
be at least $120,000/year and is absurd on its face. Liar.

>> and your repeated claim that anyone could find you on ordinary
>> databases (contradicted by your later claim that your records are concealed
>for
>> security purposes).
>>
>> You're a 100% joke, margarine boi. Everyone knows you're the cheap, fake
>> spread.
>
>One only has to do a brief review of your posting history to realize that
>your
>reputation as one of Usenet's most pathetic clowns stretches far and wide.

Tell us again about your military 401(K), your five figure MONTHLY military
pension, and your formerly public but now secret military records, margarine
boi.

You're clearly the cheap, fake spread.

COL. BILL KILGORE

unread,
Nov 17, 2003, 3:17:02 PM11/17/03
to

Charles Nemo wrote:

(Picture Biff Tannen knocking on George McFly's forehead):

Helllooooo, hellloooo, anybody home? Think Nemo, think! If you look at the figure
of 120,000, I count 6-digits. Perhaps you you removed your head from your rectum
you would too.

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 17, 2003, 7:54:32 PM11/17/03
to

Your original claim was to a "five figure MONTHLY pension". Minimum five
figures = $10,000. Multiply that by 12 months in a year and the total is at
least $120,000/year. Trying to backpeddle, liar boi??? Is it too dark in
Bu$h's rectum for you to count on your fingers?

But let's return to the real topic: how's yer bogus Iraq war going?

COL. BILL KILGORE

unread,
Nov 17, 2003, 11:52:34 PM11/17/03
to

Charles Nemo wrote:

The real topic is your long-standing lies about your visitation and interviews
with John Wayne Gacy - THEY DIDN'T HAPPEN.

You had the gall to post such unadulterated bullshit on the open internet AFTER
Gacy was executed thinking no one would ever bother looking into the facts of your
so-called interview. Well Chuckles, people have looked at the facts - and the
facts do not support any of your claims. The visitor logs are the most damning
evidence against you, and you have steadfastly refused to back up your claims.
The Colonel has afforded you every opportunity to post or email any supporting
documentation and your response is always the same - NONE! Just as no one can
produce an Osama bin Laden tape with real-time evidence supporting the theory that
he is still alive, you are unable to post anything to back up your ridiculous Gacy
sham. You remind me of the NYT's reporter that was fired for filing a false
story(s). The only difference between you and him is that he once again has a job
somewhere.

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 18, 2003, 8:06:22 AM11/18/03
to

THEY DID HAPPEN.

>You had the gall to post such unadulterated bullshit on the open internet
>AFTER
>Gacy was executed thinking no one would ever bother looking into the facts of
>your
>so-called interview. Well Chuckles, people have looked at the facts - and
>the
>facts do not support any of your claims. The visitor logs are the most
>damning
>evidence against you, and you have steadfastly refused to back up your
>claims.
>The Colonel has afforded you every opportunity to post or email any
>supporting
>documentation and your response is always the same - NONE! Just as no one
>can
>produce an Osama bin Laden tape with real-time evidence supporting the theory
>that
>he is still alive, you are unable to post anything to back up your ridiculous
>Gacy
>sham.

No one has proven Osama is dead. No one has disproven my Gacy visits.

>You remind me of the NYT's reporter that was fired for filing a false
>story(s). The only difference between you and him is that he once again has
>a job
>somewhere.

Wrong again, margarine boi. The NYT reporter's lies were proven, and he even
admitted them. You've proven nothing negative about the existence of Osama or
my Gacy visits.

So...HOW ARE YOUR BOGUS PRESIDENT AND IRAQ WAR DOING?

P.S. TELL US ABOUT YOUR MILITARY 401(K), YOUR FIVE FIGURE MONTHLY MILITARY
PENSION, AND YOUR HIDDEN PUBLIC RECORDS.

LIAR!!!

COL. BILL KILGORE

unread,
Nov 18, 2003, 12:36:01 PM11/18/03
to

Charles Nemo wrote:

...nor has he been proven to be alive, which is much easier considering that if
dead, he may have been blown to bits and there is no body to identify. A simple
up-to-date video with Osama making a reference to a specific recent event, holding
the latest issue of Time magazine, etc. would suffice. It seems his followers can
make bombs but can't produce a simple video tape showing their leader in a current
setting.


>
> >You remind me of the NYT's reporter that was fired for filing a false
> >story(s). The only difference between you and him is that he once again has
> >a job
> >somewhere.
>
> Wrong again, margarine boi. The NYT reporter's lies were proven, and he even
> admitted them. You've proven nothing negative about the existence of Osama or
> my Gacy visits.

The only "evidence" as you call it proving your Gacy visit is your own article.
You can't provide one shred of supporting physical evidence to prove me and the
other posters that think you're full of shit wrong. The research done on the
visitor logs is much stronger evidence than your bogus "word".

>
>
> So...HOW ARE YOUR BOGUS PRESIDENT AND IRAQ WAR DOING?
>
> P.S. TELL US ABOUT YOUR MILITARY 401(K), YOUR FIVE FIGURE MONTHLY MILITARY
> PENSION, AND YOUR HIDDEN PUBLIC RECORDS.

Let's set the record straight. Between my military pension and my annuities being
drawn on my market investments and my various 401 plans, my monthly income is well
into the mid-5-figure area. The military pension alone is 4-figures. Feel better
now, you ignorant asshole.


>
>
> LIAR!!!

Pot, kettle, you know the drill. Moron.

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 18, 2003, 8:50:02 PM11/18/03
to

Oh, I'm able to post anything I want. I just don't do it because one or two
time wasters want it. That includes you, poseur boi.

>> No one has proven Osama is dead. No one has disproven my Gacy visits.
>>
>
>...nor has he been proven to be alive, which is much easier considering that
>if
>dead, he may have been blown to bits and there is no body to identify. A
>simple
>up-to-date video with Osama making a reference to a specific recent event,
>holding
>the latest issue of Time magazine, etc. would suffice. It seems his
>followers can
>make bombs but can't produce a simple video tape showing their leader in a
>current
>setting.

Neither Osama nor I need to prove anything to anyone.

>> >You remind me of the NYT's reporter that was fired for filing a false
>> >story(s). The only difference between you and him is that he once again
>has
>> >a job
>> >somewhere.
>>
>> Wrong again, margarine boi. The NYT reporter's lies were proven, and he
>even
>> admitted them. You've proven nothing negative about the existence of Osama
>or
>> my Gacy visits.
>
>The only "evidence" as you call it proving your Gacy visit is your own
>article.
>You can't provide one shred of supporting physical evidence to prove me and
>the
>other posters that think you're full of shit wrong. The research done on the
>visitor logs is much stronger evidence than your bogus "word".

The "research" is bullshit.

>> So...HOW ARE YOUR BOGUS PRESIDENT AND IRAQ WAR DOING?
>>
>> P.S. TELL US ABOUT YOUR MILITARY 401(K), YOUR FIVE FIGURE MONTHLY MILITARY
>> PENSION, AND YOUR HIDDEN PUBLIC RECORDS.
>
>Let's set the record straight. Between my military pension and my annuities
>being
>drawn on my market investments and my various 401 plans, my monthly income is
>well
>into the mid-5-figure area. The military pension alone is 4-figures. Feel
>better
>now, you ignorant asshole.

So your overall "mid 5-figure area" monthly income would be about $50,000 per
month or $600,000 per year. Sure.

Well, at least you now admit that your monthly military pension is 4-figures
rather than 5-figures. That doesn't make me feel better. It just establishes
that you're a liar.

Coochycoo

unread,
Nov 23, 2003, 3:25:38 AM11/23/03
to
>From: chas...@aol.comnojunk (Charles Nemo)

>That doesn't make me feel better. It just establishes
>that you're a liar.

...and the crowd says "Amen!"

Charles Nemo

unread,
Nov 23, 2003, 8:32:25 AM11/23/03
to
cooch...@aol.comnospam (Coochycoo) noted sagely:

AmeriKKKa has its warmongering chimpanzee Bu$h and his puppeteer Cheney, so
it's no surprise that their stooges are even lamer.

0 new messages