Newsgroups: alt.philosophy, alt.psychology, soc.women, misc.legal, alt.feminism
From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 07:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 12 2012 10:47 am
Subject: Sliding scale for domestic violence
On May 11, 6:02 pm, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > G > Oh the drama! The pathos!You complain about bureaucracy yet want MORE, Bret?
> > G > The intrigue and excitement!
> > BC > Sounds like it's win win for everyone.
> > It would motivate women to make
> > small timers out to be the monsters.
> Get a better social safety net.
> > (More conflict of interest)
> There's no getting around the fact that you will first need to level
> The 0.01% pay their shills in the media to Jerry Springerize the
> Of course, keeping the rich rich and the poor poor _is_ a lofty goal
> Bret Cahill
> "A popular government without popular information . . ."
> -- James Madison
Privatized or not, such operations are
Has any socialist state or even communist
Maybe we should nationalize the Fed and all banks?
Andy Jackson went to WAR with the Fed and
That secretive BS with the Fed is too much.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.