Re: "JAck Harkness" as anti-Doctor
<p>sychotic <c>hicken
of evidence <gabfsd$4b7$3...@news.datemas.de> it was clear the jury was
balanced on a knife edge:
>How does that make you feel?
>
So now you think you can pretend to be a shrink ... so be it !
>--
>Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
>they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
>a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
>should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
>the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
>
>.
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:gab1sa$n2g$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <Gw6yk.1011$Wd.323@trnddc01>,
>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >The Doctor wrote:
>> >> In article <o7Yxk.894$Af3.240@trnddc06>,
>> >> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> tom...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> >>>> On Sep 10, 3:22 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> tom...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Sep 9, 3:08 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <1220964859.637...@proxy02.news.clara.net>,
>> >>>>>>> The Face of Po <gkenning...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>> >>>>>>>> Adam Highway got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> >>>>>>>>> On 1 Sep, 16:15, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> In article
><Pine.NEB.4.64.0809011439240.12...@sdf.lonestar.org>,
>> >>>>>>>>>> The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To me Jack is an anti-Doctor. JAck Harkness is an alias
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for a 51st Century Time Traveller.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> His past is mysterious.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sounds like someone we know?
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Only in the most vague terms there Yads... It's like saying a
>> >>>>>>>>>>> professional baseball player is like a mexican child with a
>> >>> pinata, since
>> >>>>>>>>>>> they both swing around sticks with the intention of hitting
>> >something.
>> >>>>>>>>>> And for TWS2 there is reference to his younger brother.
>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>> Member - Liberal International
>> >>>>>>>>>> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
>> >>>>>>>>>> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
>> >>>>>>>>> You know, you disappear from radw for a couple of years, come
>back,
>> >>>>>>>> Welcome back!
>> >>>>>>>>> and Yads is still spouting the same, irrelevant,
>incomprehensible
>> >>>>>>>>> rubbish.
>> >>>>>>>> In other news, the RTD-bashing continues, DBurns is in a locked
>groove,
>> >>>>>>>> Snarky is stirring things up, and Agamemnon is one stick short of
>a
>> >>>>>>>> stick. Do you have something new to bring to the discussion? ;-)
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Welcome back Adam.
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Member - Liberal International
>> >>>>>>> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> >>>>>>> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Canada vote
>> >anything but
>> >>>>>>> Conservative on 14 OCt 2008, join us
>> >>> athttp://www.harpocrit.ca.-Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >>>>>> Oi freak! Don't say welcome back to Adam like he's your friend,
>when
>> >>>>>> you know damn well he's not. He doesn't like you one bit. To bother
>> >>>>>> him by talking to him at all is bad enough, but how DARE you insult
>> >>>>>> him by making out he's friends with a creep like you?
>> >>>>>> Know your place freak!
>> >>>>> Oh for fucks sake!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Not only is it usenet, so everything posted is fair game for
>everyone
>> >>>>> else, but Adam was actually talking ABOUT Yads.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> If you want private conversations, keep them private - usenet is
>> >>>>> public conversation and by posting it IN usenet, it is an invitation
>for
>> >>>>> anyone who wants to participate.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Yads may or may not be a troll, but you've gone so obsessed
>you've
>> >>>>> turned yourself into a fucking stalker.- Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >>>> And yet you weren't saying any of this to Yads when I tried ignoring
>> >>>> him only for him to start pestering me. Infact I recall you had a go
>> >>>> at me for responding to his provocation. So where's the fairness?
>> >>> He didn't pick you out special to pester - he treated you just
>> >>> exactly like he treats every other poster - I'm not even sure he takes
>> >>> note of who is posting.
>> >>>
>> >>> And yeah, I wasn't calling Yads a stalker - he isn't one.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm calling you a stalker because you are.
>> >>
>> >> Tom80s is a freak!
>> >
>> > Tom was driven crazy by you, it's very rude of you to gloat about it.
>>
>> I never drove Tom80s crazy; he did it to himself.
>> --
>> Member - Liberal International
>> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Canada vote anything
>but
>> Conservative on 14 OCt 2008, join us at http://www.harpocrit.ca .
>
>
--
<p>sychotic <c>hicken
http://crass.on.ru/bin/upload/files/mp3/Trashmen-Surfin::Bird.mp3
Friends intervene on Friends.
Something seems to be seriously wrong with my computer. It is working!
The Doctor
Top Poster and Tom80s are mental midget.
john smith
Judging from the completely irrational - nay, lunatic - ideas you believe
in, have you ever considered that you may be a "mental midget" too?
Your insane beliefs about rainbows conclusively prove that you must be!
The Doctor
Said an irrationalist lunatic.
john smith
Repeating what I've just called you is incredibly lame and unimaginative,
Yads, and fails to address the point that your beliefs are just that:
unfounded nonsensical beliefs.
Try a bit harder next time, eh?
The Doctor
Trying to be ORwell?
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:gacila$62e$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...