Bosch/Bin Laden
Grantland
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of August 14, 1999
Bosch/Bin Laden
by Dr. William Pierce
I was looking last night at some paintings by the 15th-century Flemish
painter, Hieronymous Bosch. Interesting, but pretty weird stuff. Bosch
was sort of a godfather to the Surrealist school of painters, who came
along 450 years later: Salvador Dali and his limp clocks, for example.
I don't know much about Bosch's life, but he was a moralist, and his
paintings, with their nightmare quality, reflected his concern for the
moral condition of Dutch society in his time. I thought to myself as I
studied his paintings, "My God, what would Bosch be painting if he
were alive today in America?" I shuddered when I thought about it.
This is indeed an age which lends itself to surrealist treatment.
Public life today lacks some important elements of reality.
I was looking at Bosch's paintings right after having seen Bill
Clinton on television preaching about his opposition to a tax-cut bill
which the Republican Congress had just passed, and that's what made me
think about what Bosch might have painted in the Clinton era. I mean,
there was this unspeakable piece of filth up there at his lectern,
this reprobate, this criminal, wagging his finger and moralizing about
doing what's good for the American people, and no one was hooting him
down or even laughing at him. All of the media people were taking him
seriously and showing him respect: not even an expression of distaste
on the news commentator's face or a hint of contempt in his voice. I
could imagine millions of other television viewers around the country
soberly watching this same newscast and seeing nothing amiss. I
believe that Howdy Doody or Fred Flintstone could have been up there
on the speaker's podium with the Presidential seal, saying the same
things Clinton said, and as long as the media people treated it
seriously the viewers would see nothing amiss.
I don't know what the moral condition of Dutch society was like in the
15th century, but it certainly couldn't have been worse than that of
American society today. Actually, I guess it's not really the moral
condition of the American public I'm complaining about. It's the
surreal nature of public life in America today.
I'll give you an example of what I mean when I say that there's
something which isn't real about our society. When Israel's new prime
minister, Ehud Barak, was visiting the United States recently, he was
treated with great respect by the media people. He was described as an
Israeli "war hero" and as the man who might be able to bring peace to
the Middle East. Now, to the Jews the term "hero" has a different
meaning than it does to us. Let me tell you about one of Ehud Barak's
"heroic" exploits. In 1972 Barak headed an Israeli assassination squad
which was landed on a Lebanese beach near Beirut late at night by an
Israeli submarine -- supplied, of course, by the United States. Israel
and Lebanon were at peace at the time, but Israel always has had a
policy of assassinating troublesome Gentiles, whether they are Islamic
religious leaders or Egyptian rocket scientists or Palestinians who
write patriotic poetry or anyone else the Jews don't like. The excuse
usually is that the victim was a threat to Israel. The threats which
Barak's murder squad dealt with that night in 1972 when they landed on
the beach near Beirut were two Palestinian political writers and a
poet, living in exile in Lebanon after having been "ethnically
cleansed" by the Israelis.
Barak and two other members of his squad quietly picked the lock and
let themselves into the house of Palestinian writer Kamal Edwan and
his family in the Beirut suburb of Verdun at one o'clock in the
morning. Using silenced submachine guns they slaughtered Edwan, his
wife, and his daughter while they slept in their beds. Other members
of Barak's murder squad killed the other two victims and their
families. Escaping from Lebanon and returning to Israel as a "hero,"
Barak explained to journalists that it had been necessary to shoot all
three members of the Edwan family because the women attempted to
shield Kamal from the Jews' bullets. Well, the facts are that although
the bullet-riddled body of Kamal's wife was found on the bed beside
him, his daughter's bullet-riddled body was found alone in her own
bedroom.
Now, all of the major media in the United States knew about this at
the time of Barak's visit to the United States last month. These 1972
murders made headlines around the world at the time, and, as I said,
Barak was treated as a hero when he returned to Israel from this
murder mission. This sort of information is kept on file at the New
York Times, the Associated Press, the Washington Post, and every major
news agency. You can dig it up yourself from any major library. But
there wasn't a word about any of this in the U.S. news media last
month. Why not? Was it irrelevant after 27 years?
Imagine that it had been a senior statesman from Germany who was being
entertained at the White House last month instead of the prime
minister of Israel. Imagine that during the Second World War, in 1942,
say -- that's 57 years ago instead of 27 -- the German statesman had
been the head of an SS team which killed Jews, and the news media here
knew it. Do you believe that they would have remained silent about the
events of 57 years ago in order to avoid embarrassing our visitor or
Mr. Clinton, or because they believed that the events of 57 years ago
had become irrelevant after the passage of so much time? I mean,
really, what do you think?
Let me help you: the Jews always get special treatment. They own the
media, they control the Clinton government, they believe they're
entitled to special treatment, and they get it. You know as well as I
that it is inconceivable that any foreign official who had killed
Jews, and the media knew about it, could be entertained at the White
House while the media kept quiet about the official's past. But a
Jewish official who has murdered Gentiles -- hey, that's different: no
need to remind the public about that.
And of course, the murders of Palestinian families that Ehud Barak
carried out under the cover of darkness in 1972 were not the end of
his career as a cold-blooded murderer of women and children. The 1972
murders were among the few that made headlines around the world, but
he kept on doing the same sort of thing. Nowadays, of course, he
doesn't actually go out and shoot people himself; he just gives the
orders to have people shot.
This year, the day after Barak took office as prime minister of
Israel, his Mossad agents murdered a 27-year-old Lebanese nuclear
physicist in his Paris apartment. The Jews believe that people who are
likely to sympathize with their enemies, with people from whom they
have stolen land -- with the Palestinians, for example -- should not
be permitted to become nuclear physicists, because their enemies may
benefit from the knowledge, from the expertise. And so the Jews
arrange to have these people murdered whenever they can. They count on
the media under the control of their kinsmen to cover for them and on
crooked politicians who are in their pocket not to make a fuss. And
the politicians who run France these days are approximately as corrupt
as those who run the United States -- which means totally corrupt. So
the Jews get away with this sort of behavior.
Well, that's Jews for you. And I really wouldn't waste much time
worrying about the type of people they are or what they do if they
were doing all of their dirty work over in the Middle East somewhere
among their fellow Semites. But they're doing their dirty work over
here, among us, and it concerns all of us. At least, it ought to be a
matter of concern to all of us, because it certainly affects all of
us.
I'll just recap what I've said so far: the mass media in the United
States -- all of them, the TV network news programs, the national
newspapers and news magazines such as the New York Times, the
Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report -- all of
them knew about Barak's background when he was in this country
recently, and they all covered for him. They all concealed his bloody
past from the American people -- deliberately and knowingly concealed
it and portrayed Barak as a "man of peace" -- so that Bill Clinton and
the other politicians could suck up to him and promise him billions of
dollars more from the U.S. Treasury -- our money -- without any
protest from us. And the media did that because Barak is a Jew,
because he is the head of the Jewish state, and they -- the media
bosses -- also are Jews or are completely tied up in collaboration
with the Jews.
Now that's a serious business, and it ought to concern all of us. It's
not just that ordinary Americans, who depend on the mass media for
everything they know -- or think they know -- about what's happening
in the world are being deceived. One could argue that that's not
important, because most ordinary Americans never understand anything
anyway, whether they're being deliberately deceived or not, so what
difference does it make whether it's the Jews or someone else who's
deceiving them; they're just sheep; they don't count.
Now, that's not my position. I believe that we must have honest,
accurate, and responsible mass media in the hands of our own people. I
believe that ordinary Americans at least ought to have the information
needed to understand what's happening in the world, whether they have
the desire or the intelligence to take advantage of that information
or not. But as I just said the problem is bigger than the fact that
the public is being deceived. You know, there are a great many
Americans who are not sheep and who are not so easily deceived: smart,
wide-awake Americans who have the same access to information that I
do, Americans who understand that their personal success and welfare
depend on their knowing about what's happening in the world.
People like Bill Gates don't simply take at face value everything they
see on their television screens. But Bill Gates doesn't speak out. He
does nothing to counter the deception and plundering of his own
people. Instead he knowingly collaborates with the Jews in the
deception. His Microsoft Corporation is involved in a joint media
venture with NBC.
And of course it's not just Bill Gates. No one who understands what's
happening and who also has the resources to oppose it effectively is
willing to do so. Everyone is looking out only for himself. Everyone
is willing to collaborate with the Jews or with Bill Clinton or with
any other evil and destructive group or person or policy so long as
there's some personal advantage to doing so. No one is willing to
stand up for what is true and right if there is no personal advantage
for himself in doing so. There are not even ten righteous men of
wealth and power in America to justify the continued existence of this
nation, of this society. That is the nightmare quality of American
society today which Hieronymous Bosch would be truly challenged to
symbolize in his painting if he were here today.
Before I move on I want to state once more the point I've made here.
First, Ehud Barak, the current prime minister of Israel, the man who
was entertained in the White House by Bill Clinton last month and was
promised billions of dollars more of our money, is a man who used to
murder people that the Jews wanted murdered. He used to murder
intellectuals whose ideas the Jews considered dangerous -- and their
wives and children. He used to murder them personally and close-up, so
that he got spattered with their blood and brains as they begged for
mercy. He is a cold-blooded murderer. He is a terrorist. The 1972
murders in Beirut I described are a matter of public record, and you
can check them out for yourself in any large library. Check using the
key words Kamal Edwan.
Second, the mass media here all knew this, but they covered up for
Barak. They would not have done that except that he is a Jew and it is
in the interest of Jews to conceal his background from the American
taxpayers who are supporting Israel. The Jewish media bosses do not
want American Gentiles to know that the leading Jew in the world
today, the Jew who is looked up to and admired by Jews in America as
well as in Israel, is an assassin, a cold-blooded murderer of women
and children. The media bosses do not want Americans to understand
that that's the sort of man most admired by their Jewish neighbors.
Third, other knowledgeable people in America, knowledgeable Gentiles,
rich and influential Gentiles, who should have been providing
leadership and guidance to other Americans, also knew about Barak, but
they remained silent rather than offend the Jews.
You know, you don't have to agree with me about what we ought to do
about the Jews. You may believe that it's possible to live in the same
country with Jews. You may even believe in equality or democracy or --
heaven forbid! -- diversity, but you cannot call yourself an honest
man or a patriot if you were one of those who knew about Barak and
remained silent. And of course, the concealing of Barak's murderous
background from the public is only one of hundreds of similar moral
failures I could cite, failures to speak out and provide the truth to
the public on important issues when the Jewish media are deliberately
concealing the truth. I've spoken myself about dozens of these issues
on these American Dissident Voices programs: about the deliberate
effort by the Jewish media to make the White public believe that most
so-called "hate crimes" involve Whites attacking non-Whites, for
example, by providing enormously inflated news coverage of the tiny
minority of interracial crimes in which that is the case and
completely suppressing the news of the majority of interracial crimes
in which Whites are the victims. The public doesn't know about this
deception, but many wealthy and influential White people do -- and yet
they remain silent. You cannot call yourself a responsible American if
you ignore the deceptions of the mass media, if you fail to speak out
about these deceptions for fear of jeopardizing your career or your
wealth or some business relationship you have with Jews -- but who is
speaking out? I am listening. I hear no political leader, no religious
leader, no business leader speaking out.
So what will become of a country in which there no longer are any men
of wealth and power and influence who care about the country, who feel
responsible for it? What will happen to a society in which the masses
care only about their ball games and their welfare "entitlements," as
they're called these days, and the rich care only about their personal
wealth and power?
Well, let me tell you, it doesn't take a Hieronymous Bosch to look at
this society and notice that it is profoundly ill. Ordinary men and
women all around the world can see that. And while Hieronymous Bosch
isn't here today to chastise us for our lack of morality, other men
who care about morality are: men like Osama bin Laden, for example.
And the fact that men like Bin Laden can look at America and see that
it no longer has a soul, makes them infinitely more dangerous as our
moral instructors. Bin Laden knows that the next time he blows
something up a great many people will applaud him, both around the
world and in America.
The people you see on the television screen won't be applauding, of
course. Madeleine Albright and Bill Clinton will be looking very grim
and will be wagging their fingers and making threats about
retaliation. The cameras will focus on the bodies being pulled from
the rubble, and the TV commentators will be very serious and will have
the couch potatoes everywhere feeling indignant toward Bin Laden and
regarding him as a bloodthirsty terrorist who kills people without
reason. But there will be tens of thousands of Americans who
understand the situation and who will applaud Bin Laden in the privacy
of their living rooms, and there will be tens of millions of people
around the world who will applaud.
Let me reiterate: people like Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright
would have you believe that a country doesn't need a soul in order to
be healthy. Certainly, the couch potatoes, the lemmings, are not
concerned about such things as the nation's soul. As long as the bread
and circuses continue, as long as the ball games and the
"entitlements" keep coming, they will believe that everything is all
right. They really don't see anything amiss. They don't have any sort
of moral compass inside themselves to tell them that things are very
wrong in our national life. They simply believe what the media tell
them, without even a twinge of misgiving. That's one of the surreal
features of life in America today. The great bulk of the population --
the White population -- is marching happily toward national and racial
extinction. That isn't natural. It doesn't seem real -- but it is
happening.
And even though the couch potatoes can't understand this, there are
people around the world who can and do. There are people who still are
able to make moral judgments and who have the will to act on their
judgments, in one way or another. Hieronymous Bosch is no longer with
us, but Osama bin Laden is. And so are plenty of others who make
manifest their moral judgments with weapons of mass destruction
instead of with paint and canvas.
And of course, moral chastisement from without isn't the only
consequence of our situation that we should anticipate. There will be
a lot more craziness of one sort or another as people without moral
guidance react in various ways to the stresses imposed by a
disintegrating society: mass shootings, cult suicides, scandals and
outrages of every sort, from the Oval Office to every corner of
American life.
When a society no longer has any righteous men, men for whom
righteousness counts more than profit or comfort or personal security
-- righteous men who will stand up and make themselves heard in
America -- then every member of our society will pay a price. No one
will escape the craziness. Some Americans will applaud when they see
evildoers struck down; other Americans will become fearful and call
for more security from the government. But the craziness will
continue, it will become worse as our society descends into chaos, and
it will not become better until we once again have a society headed by
righteous men.
Thanks for being with me again today.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. It is
distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribes of ADVlist.
To subscribe to ADVlist, send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" as the subject of the message to: ADV...@NatVan.com
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the National
Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com
==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.
To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
or e-mail: nati...@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address given.
(c) 1999 National Vanguard Books --
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The National Alliance: http://www.natvan.com
National Vanguard Books Catalog:
http://www.natvan.com/cgi-bin/nvbctlg.txt
----> Note our =NEW= e-mail address: n...@neumedia.NET <----
[or nati...@natvan.com (permanent, but not checked as often)]
VoteForUSA - Informing the American Voter