Privacy.LIE puppet traveller/Eggplant answers own posts
Borked Pseudo Mailed
for reference. An example of this pervert answering his own posts in
apparent disagreement to project a facade of being more than one person.
---cut---
Path: s02-b12.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: Tools for Privacy
From: "Eggplant©" <veget...@theguarden.com>
References: <ONATEXHI3911...@anonymous.poster> <9b2166276d6de95c...@ecn.org> <374211f12a6e7e71...@pseudo.borked.net> <Xns98CB48B72...@63.218.45.252> <91220efed4a90f36...@deuxpi.ca> <Xns98CB6BDA7...@63.218.45.252> <1qkftxfbtf6rx$.ezbjjzy7...@40tude.net>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98CB8344...@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 02 Feb 2007 20:53:57 GMT
Lines: 131
X-Complaints-To: ab...@newshosting.com
traveler 66 <nor...@nym.alias.net> wrote in
news:1qkftxfbtf6rx$.ezbjjzy7wl1a.dlg@40tude.net:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> On 02 Feb 2007 18:35:34 GMT, Eggplant© wrote:
>
>> Anonyma <anon-b...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
>> news:91220efed4a90f36...@deuxpi.ca:A vortex formed
>> within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>>
>>> Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in=20
>>>> news:374211f12a6e7e71...@pseudo.borked.net:A vortex
>>>> formed within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>>>>=20
>>>> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
>>>> >>In article <ONATEXHI3911...@anonymous.poster>
>>>> >>anon...@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Realize that the jews are "locking up" more
>>>> >>> of the internet such that white liberation
>>>> >>> sites are banned by the providers.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Borat, is that you?! Loved your movie!
>>>> >=20
>>>> > Borat is a known homo
>>>> >=20
>>>> >=20
>>>> >=20
>>>> >=20
>>>> >=20
>>>>=20
>>>> And this has exactly what to do with the subject? What does
>>>> anyones=20 personal preferences have to do with information they
>>>> might have and be willing to share? (unlike most here).
>>>
>>> Spoken like a true baby raper.
>>>
>> Nope, just truth plain and simple.
>>
>> As for your insult, most know my prefered age for pics to view are
>> budding 12 - 14 year olds. Would never touch one. No hard core in my
>> collection. That's gross. These can't really be considered "babies"
>> anyway.
>>
>> And thank you for knowing my nic. It's an open admission that you
>> regularly visit the sites I inhabit. We've all got your number now.
>> No matter how you'll try to cover it up from here. You've just shown
>> yourself to be a major hypocrit.
>>
>> Ya know, if it weren't so tradgic it would be humorous. If someone
>> finds a budding 15 year old attractive (and any normal male who says
>> they don't is lieing) they're a baby raping pedo. But if the age of
>> consent were to be changed to 14, they would no longer be a baby
>> raping pedo. On the other hand, if the age of consent were raised to
>> 21, anyone who has bought a hustler magazine would instantly become a
>> baby raping pedo.
>>
>> It's all semantics, and I'm not the least bit ashamed to admit that
>> "a" cups bordering on "b" cups are appealing. I'm not the least bit
>> ashamed of my collection.
>>
>> The shameful people are those who, like you, go to groups I post to
>> and feel ashamed of themselves for liking it. If you know me and put
>> me down you're simply a hypocrite with a will so weak they can be
>> made ashamed for going to view what they enjoy; as if viewing made
>> them something vile. That's social conditioning and only shows your
>> weakness. You should consider ceasing to advertise it.
>>
>> By the way newbies: I'm still around and still safe thanks to
>> Privacy.li. If you want to be really secure don't listen to the Cotse
>> puppets. Go look at Cotse policies. The only way you can be secure
>> with them is by living outside the US. My track record speaks for
>> itself. Prili=safe. or at least makes getting safe possible. Cotse
>> will roll over on you in a heartbeat, and hand over you logs for the
>> asking.
>>
>> A word about logs. Many people here will start the whole "don't keep
>> logs is a lie" stuff again I'm sure. And the whole "how can spam and
>> abuse be handled without logs". Prili is not in the business of
>> tutoring people on the various types of logs. When they say they
>> don't keep logs they mean it. No logging of your activities. That's
>> an activity log. All places that have quota limits must, of course,
>> keep usage logs to know when quotas are reached. If a complaint is
>> recieved it's not that hard to check it and say "this much was posted
>> at this time. On our servers this account posted this much at this
>> time", and simply shut it down. Don't let the dissenters here tell
>> you different. I've seen it done. Saves time rather than looking into
>> the account activity logs (if kept) for the abuse. of course if it
>> were a matter of legality, anyone keeping activity logs can easily
>> enough get the info. And if they demand that you sign up with a
>> method that will identify you, a knock on your door will shortly
>> follow.
>>
>> And watch out for those here who will start asking questions. Anyone
>> can find leading questions to ask about any information given.
>>
>> If you see, for instance "why do you think <insert subject>", this is
>> pretty much meaningless. If, on the other hand, you see (which you
>> won't here) "Why do you think <insert subject> instead of <insert
>> alternative>", then they've given information. If they don't give
>> information they are simply trolls causing trouble and should be
>> ignored. Many, some probably law enforcement, will try to confuse
>> you.
>>
>> Have fun,
>>
>> Stay safe, (like me with prili)
>>
>> Eggplant.
>
> Get lost KREEP, it hasn't been long enough since you were last here.
>
Lol. Hasn't been long enough since newbs were warned off you're falacious
implications of safety from Cotse that you don't provide you mean? Bet
you don't like the truth coming out at all do you.
Provide a good service that keeps people safe the way that's implied but
not delivered and you'll never hear another word out of me.
I want to see people, and all of usenet, free and safe. You want to make
money at any cost to those who don't know you. We've all seen how you use
"precise wording" to troll. Do you think anyone is ignorant enough to
believe you don't do it for sales as well once it's pointed out to them?
You're totally transparent.
So keep your messages and opinions for someone who cares.
Eggplant.
---cut---