Congratulations, Dustin Cook, Pathetic Anal Pineapple (was Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007)
Rhonda Lea Kirk
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wran...@caballista.org> wrote
in message news:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
> <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_9kgqn7DQ
> </music>
>
> The time has come to announce the winners of the February 2007 Usenet
> Kook Awards. Envelopes, please!
<snipped>
> JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
>
> The winner is...DUSTIN "DUSTBIN" COOK!
>
> 14 votes Dustin "Dustbin" Cook
> 05 votes Michael "Howdy/Trumpet of the Lord" Schmidt
> 03 votes Double-A
> 02 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, Dustbin! I see you still haven't gotten over Rhonda
> and K-Man. Pathetic.
Yayyyyyyyyyyy! Dustin.
<snipped>
> UNABOMBER SURPRISE
>
> The winner is...WARHOL!
>
> 15 votes Warhol
> 06 votes Dustin Cook
> 00 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations again, Mad Moor! It looks like, after all these
> months of being ignored, your screed became worth laug^H^H^H^Hreading.
I'm truly disappointed with your showing in this category. Please try to
do better the next time.
<snipped>
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phčdre nó Delaunay
Warhol
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org> wrote
> in messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
I can't believe my eyes... Spyware Warhol? or Virus Warhol? Windows
Horse?
alt.privacy.spyware, alt.comp.virus, alt.comp.anti-virus,
alt.os.windows-xp,
Really Coffee boy's aint that a little bit gone to far...Har har har
The Worm diadem Ben Moor...tooo funny... Cool! Warhol-Ben-Herculis
Lets Kids Take The Wheel of Operating sytems!.. Warhol has established
several driving programs aimed at giving ontrack instruction to
corporate teams, individuals, and now kids. I wish this program was
available when I was fourty wishing-to-be-sixtie and just itching to
drive true the hidden gates of Space and Time.
The White Horseman of SallyVeas... The FEARED ONE BY ALL COFFEE
BOY'S... PROOF? THEIR AWARDS ON MY ROCK SOLID WORD...
WARHOL STILL STANDING... Rats,Vipers, Scorpions, Frogs... Wont escape
the
Wrath of the Standing one, when my Infinite hour cometH...
Pay Now or Walk the Plank Later... My Condition for your surrender...
I hope this is clear to all Coffee Boy's...
PS THANKS TO ALL COFFEE BOY'S FOR SPREADING WARHOLS WORD...
THIS WEEK I HAD 1762 READERS ON GOOGLE... Now I Known Why...Thank you
again.. Now Can you help me to get 5000 readers on Google?
John "C"
"Warhol" <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> WARHOL STILL STANDING... Rats,Vipers, Scorpions, Frogs... Wont escape
> the
> Wrath of the Standing one, when my Infinite hour cometH...
>
> Pay Now or Walk the Plank Later... My Condition for your surrender...
> I hope this is clear to all Coffee Boy's...
>
> PS THANKS TO ALL COFFEE BOY'S FOR SPREADING WARHOLS WORD...
>
> THIS WEEK I HAD 1762 READERS ON GOOGLE... Now I Known Why...Thank you
> again.. Now Can you help me to get 5000 readers on Google?
>
Keep up the good work and continue spreading the word as the Stupid and
Depraved Coffee-Bois will help you!
C.H.J.
4Q
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wran...@caballista.org> wrote
> in message news:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
> > <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_9kgqn7DQ
> > </music>
> >
> > The time has come to announce the winners of the February 2007 Usenet
> > Kook Awards. Envelopes, please!
>
> <snipped>
>
> > JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
> >
> > The winner is...DUSTIN "DUSTBIN" COOK!
> >
> > 14 votes Dustin "Dustbin" Cook
> > 05 votes Michael "Howdy/Trumpet of the Lord" Schmidt
> > 03 votes Double-A
> > 02 votes None of the above
> >
> > Congratulations, Dustbin! I see you still haven't gotten over Rhonda
> > and K-Man. Pathetic.
>
> Yayyyyyyyyyyy! Dustin.
Well done Dustbin!
I knew that tagging you was going to
be worthwhile. I'll try and upload as
much rib-tickling material as I can this
weekend (10th - 11th March 2007) to your
webpage as I can...
*lookout for*
! Abuse & Ko0KTHREATS
! Technonumpkist & Skriddle Skrit
! More About Dustbin Cook
Your best fiend (or is that "you're?")
Warhol
Of course They dont known I control them, in place they control me...
the fun of the Game... you make the other party think they control
your words... and when they are blood drunken, I smack them in their
stupid face... Hi hi hi... it works every time and the many reader
have Fun... The Art of a Peace full War against Coffee boy's Master
Clone and his slaves, the C.boy's.
And when I have 5000 readers I goto New York... like NinaHagen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CST7XOxw4Dk
The Green Knight...
Default User
<snip>
Thank you for you interest in this group, but please be advised that this
is an ENGLISH speaking group. People reading will not be able to respond
to your queries if they cannot understand whatever language you are using.
Art Deco
You've lost whatever little scrap of sanity you still clung to,
fez-head.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
Art Deco
You and outhouse john make a fine pair of racist bile bags, fez-head.
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >And when I have 5000 readers I goto New York... like NinaHagen.
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CST7XOxw4Dk
> >
> >The Green Knight...
>
> You and outhouse john make a fine pair of racist bile bags, fez-head.
--
"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish." Painius
Dustin Cook
> > in messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
describe how a kooklogist can do anything but clump together with
other
kookologists and flagellate each other.
It's okay man, HHI has written something up on you too. :)
I'll make it easy for you to find the material. And to show you how
much reach we have with the public...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=neil+young+torrent+hhi&btnG=Google+Search
Your already 0wned punkbitch. :)
Rhonda Lea Kirk
news:1173468885.9...@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com
Um...they flagellated you, Mr. Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
> It's okay man, HHI has written something up on you too. :)
Where is it? Inquiring minds want to know.
> I'll make it easy for you to find the material. And to show you how
> much reach we have with the public...
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=neil+young+torrent+hhi&btnG=Google+Search
That's how much reach you have with the public, huh? Those page ranks
must make you dizzy, Dustfuck. Not.
> Your already 0wned punkbitch. :)
I think not.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Dustin Cook
> > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org> wrote
> > in messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
> > > <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_9kgqn7DQ
> > > </music>
>
> > > The time has come to announce the winners of the February 2007 Usenet
> > > Kook Awards. Envelopes, please!
>
> > <snipped>
>
> > > JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
>
> > > The winner is...DUSTIN "DUSTBIN" COOK!
>
> > > 14 votes Dustin "Dustbin" Cook
> > > 05 votes Michael "Howdy/Trumpet of the Lord" Schmidt
> > > 03 votes Double-A
> > > 02 votes None of the above
>
> > > Congratulations, Dustbin! I see you still haven't gotten over Rhonda
> > > and K-Man. Pathetic.
>
> > Yayyyyyyyyyyy! Dustin.
>
Thanks, 4Q.
> I knew that tagging you was going to
> be worthwhile. I'll try and upload as
Indeed, it would seem to be amusing for both sides. Here's a more
accurate url for your greetings in the new .nfo release files.
Anything else you'd like added? :) The typo is intentional, btw. :)
http://www.bitenova.nl/tt/355yv
Don't forget to download Neil Young, if you like that type of music.
It sounds great!
I won't flatter myself or the group by cut/pasting all the thank yous
for the fine rip we recieve... Ya sure, some will not approve of what
we do and side with you, but the majority of the people on the planet
will side with us. :) Good luck with your attack on HHI, may it be as
amusing for you as you had hoped.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
"The typo is intentional."
So what's the significance, Dustin? If it's intentional, it must mean
something, right?
> Don't forget to download Neil Young, if you like that type of music.
> It sounds great!
>
> I won't flatter myself or the group by cut/pasting all the thank yous
> for the fine rip we recieve... Ya sure, some will not approve of what
> we do and side with you, but the majority of the people on the planet
> will side with us. :)
The majority? Unlikely.
> Good luck with your attack on HHI, may it be as
> amusing for you as you had hoped.
So are you saying that you /are/ the sum total of HHI?
Y'know...I'll bet you are.
4Q
> On Mar 9, 10:31 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> > > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org> wrote
> > > in messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
> > > > <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_9kgqn7DQ
> > > > </music>
> >
> > > > The time has come to announce the winners of the February 2007 Usenet
> > > > Kook Awards. Envelopes, please!
> >
> > > <snipped>
> >
> > > > JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
> >
> > > > The winner is...DUSTIN "DUSTBIN" COOK!
> >
> > > > 14 votes Dustin "Dustbin" Cook
> > > > 05 votes Michael "Howdy/Trumpet of the Lord" Schmidt
> > > > 03 votes Double-A
> > > > 02 votes None of the above
> >
> > > > Congratulations, Dustbin! I see you still haven't gotten over Rhonda
> > > > and K-Man. Pathetic.
> >
> > > Yayyyyyyyyyyy! Dustin.
> >
> > Well done Dustin!
>
> Thanks, 4Q.
YouR'e wellcum
>
>
> > I knew that tagging you was going to
> > be worthwhile. I'll try and upload as
>
> Indeed, it would seem to be amusing for both sides. Here's a more
> accurate url for your greetings in the new .nfo release files.
> Anything else you'd like added? :) The typo is intentional, btw. :)
>
> http://www.bitenova.nl/tt/355yv
I don't know what the fuck you are going
on about. Smoke less crack, dude :/
>
> Don't forget to download Neil Young, if you like that type of music.
> It sounds great!
>
> I won't flatter myself or the group by cut/pasting all the thank yous
> for the fine rip we recieve... Ya sure, some will not approve of what
> we do and side with you, but the majority of the people on the planet
> will side with us. :) Good luck with your attack on HHI, may it be as
> amusing for you as you had hoped.
My attack on HHI? I couldn't really give
a flying fuck about your illegal pirate
group 'HHI'. If you were to show me where
all the goodshit spoken about HHI is,
then it might raise my interest above
0.01... So please publish it into Usenet.
*imagine you see a hook dangling, if you
like*
Meanwhile back to the usenet archives,
they are cracking me up with all your
treading on dick con-trEadDicK'tions.
Kadaitcha Man
ass-head. In swinish sleep their drenched natures lie. Thou bawdy rude
despiser of good manners. Thou milk-livered carry-tale. Ye poured forth
and ye spritzed:
> JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
>
> The winner is...DUSTIN "DUSTBIN" COOK!
>
> 14 votes Dustin "Dustbin" Cook
> 05 votes Michael "Howdy/Trumpet of the Lord" Schmidt
> 03 votes Double-A
> 02 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, Dustbin! I see you still haven't gotten over Rhonda
> and K-Man. Pathetic.
Crikey, Dustfart, you garnered nearly 60% of the voting public's ire. Way to
go.
Kookle Search Results
4 matches for "Dustin Cook".
Dustin Cook
Kook of the Month, September 2006
Coward of the Month, September 2006
Joseph Bartlo "Pathetic Anal Pineapple" Award, February 2007
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #22
> BUSTED URINAL AWARD
>
> The winner is...DUANE ARNOLD!
>
> 12 votes Duane Arnold, alias "Maximum Hag"
> 11 votes nightbat of alt.astronomy
> 02 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, DUH-ane! Your attempts at laming Kadaitcha Man were
> so putrid that the voters judged them to smell worse than one of the
> most persistent poast editors AUK has seen in many a year.
Hey, DUHane, yet another ko0k award to add to your collection. Of course, it
goes without needing to be said that you won't understand the definitive
relationship between your posts and the stench of a broken pissoir in a
Paris high street.
> ORDER OF THE HOLEY SOCKPUPPET
>
> The winner is...Duane Arnold, alias "Maximum Hag"
>
> 19 votes YES
> 01 votes NO
>
> Congratulations again, DUH-ane! Did you really think you could fool
> anyone with that smelly sock of yours?
BWAHAHAHAHA! 19 votes out of 20, DUHane. The number is directly
proportional to your patheticism.
Kookle Search Results
4 matches for "Duane Arnold".
Duane Arnold
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, September 2006
Busted Urinal Award
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet
Goofy Azzed Babboon
> HAMMER OF THOR
>
> The winner is...KADAITCHA MAN!
>
> 12 votes Kadaitcha Man
> 09 votes Charlotte L. Blackmer
> 06 votes Snarky
> 00 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, Kadaitcha Man! I told you your luck would change
> after January. It certainly did, as you managed to defeat a strong
> field of worthy kookologists. All hail Kadaitcha Man!!!1!!
Woo Hoo! Commiserations to the others, and thanks to all for the support and
vote of confidence.
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Vescere puter subgalia meis.
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Maximum Dog
<You're just an old worthless dancer.>
<VBG>
miguel
>> Congratulations, Kadaitcha Man! I told you your luck would change
>> after January. It certainly did, as you managed to defeat a strong
>> field of worthy kookologists. All hail Kadaitcha Man!!!1!!
>
> Woo Hoo! Commiserations to the others, and thanks to all for the support and
> vote of confidence.
It's a shame this wasn't awarded posthumously, bitch.
miguel
Maximum Dog
> Woo Hoo! Commiserations to the others, and thanks to all for seeing me for the
> silly and sleepless bitch that I am. I know no one has any confidence in my game.
>
>
Kadaitcha Man
remorseless. Thou ineffectual fellow of no merits. Thou boozy manikin.
Ye brown-nosed and ye whined:
Aw, poor you.
Say, Cranston, you do realise that you spewed 4k of froth at Kali in one
post, don't you?
[QUOTE]
Of course there is variance in application of standards across
individuals and situations. Of course this isn't a black and white
issue. Very few things are. But what the fuck does that have to do with
the double standard I identified?
Again: the kook crew here feels free to netkop somebody about the BI,
but if you contact an ISP about TOS violations re content, that's
verboten. If I were to contact Snarky's provider about his insults,
suddenly I'm a netkkkopper. It's freaky stupid is what it is. Yet nearly
everybody here has bought into it.
These mores are adopted to insulate those who engage in shitty behavior
from the consequences of their behavior. It's the same with taking
usenet to real life. Suppose somebody hides behind their keyboard
calling an enemy all sorts of rancid names and making all sorts of
outlandish claims. It's considered kooky to drag that person's ass from
behind his keyboard and kick the shit out of him. The reason this
standard exists is merely to protect that cowardly asshole that engages
in this behavior. Such a standard exists nowhere else. What could
possibly justify this standard?
Well, psychology isn't a real science, so I understand your inferiority
complex and your need to sound like you're educated.
What's next? Suggesting I need anger management?
LOL.
Also, your pants are on fire. By the next post I'm quite sure they'll be
hanging over the telephone wire.
There is a difference between "presume" and "assume." One with your
academic credentials should surely understand this.
A real scientist would recognize that curves tend toward steep or flat.
Curves aren't slow or fast. But you are a psychologist so this is
probably new to you. Since you are so proud of your advanced database of
knowledge perhaps you should add this little factoid to it. Next time
you want to insult somebody by referencing his or her learning curve,
the more precise (and precision is your paramount desire, we know) way
to do it would be to suggest that they have a flat learning curve.
Mathematically you could represent this as Y=0. This is, incidentally,
Joan GriffinTHAL's learning curve.
This is about as hard as doing reverse psychology on my grandson. When
he was two.
Well, are you?
Feel free to flesh out your claim with examples.
Tick tock.
Feel free to flesh out your claim with examples.
Tick tock.
Feel free to provide them.
Tick tock.
Not true. Your first less than friendly act was to respond with feigned
politeness to my original question. I responded to that with equally
feigned politeness, mirroring yours. Next, you asked your loaded, er,
pointed question that implied your belief I was paranoid -- definitely
kookbait. I responded pedantically in order to return the insult. We've
traded insults pretty equally from there, although in my opinion I'm
certainly winning on points because mine are so much more clever, witty
and cutting than yours.
Sniggler^wSchoolmarm please!
Your tendency to project disliked parts of yourself onto me is well
evidenced in this thread.
tee hee!
miguel
[/QUOTE]
You have k0oK tattooed in 2" high letters on your steeply sloping forehead.
Kookle Search Results
2 matches for "cranston".
Mike "Miguel" Cranston
Busted Urinal Award
Mike "Miguel" Cranston, trained by Bookman
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Oh. You have room to grow too.
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Kadaitcha Man
nauseating basest groom. Thou shallow-hearted boy. Thou rude-growing,
legless pedant. Ye asserted and ye advocated:
<chucks bone>
FETCH!
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Maximum Dog
<snipped>
<You're just a worthless dramatics dancer and a hag that should retire,
but you're just too stupid to do it.>
<Let me remind you as to just what you are.>
<http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/The_Kadaitcha_Dancers>
<plank>
miguel
time did you spend on the cut and paste?
miguel
Kadaitcha Man
craven, stagnant stretch-mouthed rascal. Thou banditto slave. Hang cur,
hang, you whoreson, insolent noisemaker. Ye agonised and ye piped:
<chucks bone>
Moog
+0000, by typing:
> You're just a worthless dramatics dancer
Duane. Are you still spouting this dancing bollocks after frequently
getting your arse kicked into next week?
Fuxake. It's like lemmings revisited.
--
Moog
http://www.last.fm/user/efcmoog/
"Liquor in the Front. Poker in the Rear"
Kadaitcha Man
false-trembling coward. Thou peevish officer. Thou swag-bellied, roguish
filthy piece of work. Ye poured out and ye gossiped:
You need to brush up on your fancy footwork, Cranston. Trying to get the
attention off your 4k of froth and onto a single, short sentence didn't
work.
> miguel
PS: Your projection is also noted.
miguel
> You need to [BITCHSLAP!]
Isn't it about time you died again, bitch?
miguel
Maximum Dog
<snipped>
<trifling hag>
<bye>
Kadaitcha Man
of a bodkin. Thou damnable box of envy. Thou divel. Ye poured forth and
ye guffawed:
Snip it all you like, chew-toy. The object of your fear is still there in
the original.
Monkey see, monkey do, btw. That's the #1 lame, and the snip is #3.
[Insert obIKYABWAI here]
> Isn't it about time you died again, bitch?
#7
>>>>> It's a shame this wasn't awarded posthumously, bitch.
1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
edit, context snip, etc.
4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
excretions, masturbation etc.
6. blink (clueless)
7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
then? That proves my point. Get a life, etc.
10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
> miguel
Your score sheet so far:
1. #
2.
3. #
4.
5.
6.
7. #
8.
9.
10.
Good going, cranston. You managed three obLames and fuck all else in a
single post.
Maximum Dog
<snipped>
>
> Isn't it about time you died again, bitch?
>
When the *bitch* dies, even her family will cheer about it. I am sure
she is nothing but a nightmare to them.
Moog
by typing:
>> Fuxake. It's like lemmings revisited.
>
> Hey let's play munkey in the middle with DUHane.
That sounds like a fine plan. When are we going to start?
Maximum Dog
<snipped>
<It's a weak game aka ??????????.>
Maximum Dog
<snipped>
<It's weak.>
Moog
+0000, by typing:
> <snipped>
>
> <It's weak.>
Is see you've stopped your ludicrous dancing response now Duane. That's,
at the very least, a start. Great news.
If you want anymore of my advice, please feel free to ask.
Fuckwart.
miguel
>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>> LOL.
>>> Well, are you?
>>> Tick tock.
>>> Tick tock.
>>> Tick tock.
>>> Sniggler^wSchoolmarm please!
>>> tee hee!
> The majority of said froth was a quote of your post.
You'd probably accuse the danimal of frothing. Quantity is not a sound
measure of emotional content. Most of you people are too dumb to realize
this, or too invested in using your fagboi retard nerd gimp weapons to
care. You surely aren't intellectually honest enough to acknowledge that
I pretty much matched Kali in output word for word.
What would that say about her posts?
miguel
>>> The majority of said froth was a quote of your post.
>> You'd probably accuse the danimal of frothing. Quantity is not a sound
>> measure of emotional content. Most of you people are too dumb to realize
>> this, or too invested in using your fagboi retard nerd gimp weapons to
>> care. You surely aren't intellectually honest enough to acknowledge that
>> I pretty much matched Kali in output word for word.
>> What would that say about her posts?
> I'd say find someone who gives a shit.
I did, dumbass. Thanks for playing.
miguel
Kadaitcha Man
pork-bellied rank-scented meiny. Thou dam. Thou greasy, blue-haired
fever blister. Ye fussed and ye proscribed:
> I pretty much matched Kali in output word for word.
>
> What would that say about her posts?
<aside>
Meh. cranston tries for a narcissism hit by stealth.
miguel
> miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> Thou measureless liar. Thou callow,
> pork-bellied rank-scented meiny. Thou dam. Thou greasy, blue-haired
> fever blister. Ye fussed and ye proscribed:
>
>> I pretty much matched Kali in output word for word.
>>
>> What would that say about her posts?
>
> <aside>
> Meh. cranston tries for a narcissism hit by stealth.
Translation: He shoots! He scores!
hth he-bitch
miguel
Kadaitcha Man
scab-laden empiric. Thou poisonous lecher. Ye muttered and ye chatted:
#4.
> Thanks for playing.
#1. #7.
Nice work, cranston. Two three-word sentences and three stock lames. You
scored another #7 for repeating #1.
1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
edit, context snip, etc.
4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
excretions, masturbation etc.
6. blink (clueless)
7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
then? That proves my point. Get a life, etc.
10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
Your score so far:
1. ##
2.
3. #
4. #
5.
6.
7. ##
8.
9.
10.
Six lames, two short posts. You must be proud, cranston.
miguel
some people are chuckling though.
miguel
Kadaitcha Man
figure pedantical. Thou is open to incontinency. Ye gagged and ye
meowed:
#1.
> hth he-bitch
#4.
> miguel
1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
edit, context snip, etc.
4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
excretions, masturbation etc.
6. blink (clueless)
7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
then? That proves my point. Get a life, etc.
10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
Your score so far:
1. ###
2.
3. #
4. ###
5.
6. #
7. ##
8.
9.
10.
4 posts, 10 lames.
miguel
>
Please stop! I can't take any more of that!
Moog
typing:
> Please stop! I can't take any more of that!
A good usenet rimming is too much for you?.....
*squeel* *squeel*
I know a great back street usenet doctor that can cure you.
miguel
posting and make up a scorecard? I've got to head out for awhile, but
I'll look forward to seeing your research when I return.
hth he-bitch
miguel
Maximum Dog
Kadaitcha Man
dog-hearted, shrill-gorged fruit bat. Thou begrimed soft-bellied toad.
Thou befogged friend of an ill fashion. Ye sickened and ye fussed:
#4.
> Can you go back over my past 10 years of posting and make
> up a scorecard?
#3.
> I've got to head out for awhile,
#9.
> but
> I'll look forward to seeing your research when I return.
#9.
> hth he-bitch
1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
edit, context snip, etc.
4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
excretions, masturbation etc.
6. blink (clueless)
7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
then? That proves my point. Get a life. Yawn, etc.
10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
Your score so far:
1. ###
2.
3. ##
4. ####
5.
6. #
7. ##
8.
9. ##
10. #
Plus the #10 you weren't awarded for your earlier autoflame.
5 posts, 15 lames. "Read cranston. 3 lames in every post!"
Moog
+0000, by typing:
> <fuck off>
Wow Duane....
And there was me hoping to employ some form of intellectual response.
Still. Dance little fuckwit. <dance> {dance}
I am the piper and you follow the tune.
Cunt.
Kadaitcha Man
beslubbering very valiant trencher-man. Thou arrant knave. Thou
effeminate prince. Ye contrived and ye dreamt up:
> Waving the white flag so soon?
You watch... he'll tell you, in some roundabout way, that he was being
funny, thereby proving he wasn't.
And I bet a cup of tomcat piss to a bucket of his mushed brains he doesn't
get that statement either.
Kadaitcha Man
of private steps. Thou dissembling knight. Thy intellect is not
replenished, thou art only an animal, only sensible in the duller parts.
Ye apple-polished and ye ummed and arred:
> <fuck off>
<chucks bone into industrial mincer>
FETCH!
Kadaitcha Man
flap-dragon. Thou pasty-faced, cockered boy of tears. Ye huddled and ye
disembogued:
#9.
> It's no big feat
#9.
> to get you all spun up,
#9. #1.
> he-bitch.
#4
> I'm
> sure some people are chuckling though.
#9.
> miguel
1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
edit, context snip, etc.
4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
excretions, masturbation etc.
6. blink (clueless)
7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
then? That proves my point. Get a life. Yawn. It was nothing.
Lurkers are on my side, etc.
10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
Your score so far:
1. ####
2.
3. ##
4. #####
5.
6. #
7. ###
8.
9. ##### #
10. #
Plus another #7 for three #9's in a row, four in a single post.
6 posts, 22 lames.
You belong in a knacker's yard, cranston.
Maximum Dog
<It's your calling. It's your cup of tea.>
Kadaitcha Man
ill-bred rude unpolished hind. Thou loathed enemy. Thou bat-fowling,
shard-borne outward-sainted deputy. Ye scribbled and ye produced:
> <What else have you got to do?>
> <It's your calling. It's your cup of tea.>
This is what else I have to do...
private void SelectNodeFromTag(Guid TagValue, _
TreeNode ParentNode)
{
foreach (TreeNode ChildNode in ParentNode.Nodes) {
if (ChildNode.Tag == TagValue) {
TreeViewMain.SelectedNode = ChildNode;
SetToolStripOptions(mnC_MASK_EDIT + mnC_MASK_ACCT, _
gnC_WOBJ_TYPE_SubAccount);
return;
}
TreeViewMain.SelectedNode = ParentNode;
FillNode(ParentNode);
SetToolStripOptions(mnC_MASK_NEW + mnC_MASK_ACCT, _
gnC_WOBJ_TYPE_SubAccount);
private void HookNewPanel(Panel TargetPanel)
{
Panel ParentHolder = TargetPanel.Parent;
TableLayoutPanel tlpUnhook = ContentHolder.Controls(_zero);
int unhookHeight = tlpUnhook.Height;
int hookHeight = TargetPanel.Height;
ParentHolder.Controls.Remove(TargetPanel);
ParentHolder.Height = unhookHeight;
ContentHolder.Controls.Remove(tlpUnhook);
ContentHolder.Height = hookHeight;
ContentHolder.Controls.Add(TargetPanel);
TargetPanel.Parent = ContentHolder;
ParentHolder.Controls.Add(tlpUnhook);
tlpUnhook.Parent = ParentHolder;
ContentScroller.ScrollControlIntoView( _
ContentScroller.Controls(_zero));
}
<chucks bone>
Maximum Dog
> <chucks skeletons>
> My Master Lucifer told me to FETCH his slippers and be a good *grrl*.
>
Kadaitcha Man
There is no more valour in that Poins than in a wild duck. Thou hideous
filth as thou art. Thou idle-headed addicted so and so. Ye screaked and
ye expelled:
> Mrs. K-Lucifer wrote:
>
>> <chucks skeletons>
>> My Master Lucifer told me to FETCH his slippers and be a good *grrl*.
There go all the claims you made about never reading my posts, DUHanetard.
Cam-man
>Maximum Dog <Maxim...@Dog.com> Thou white-livered and red-faced slug.
>There is no more valour in that Poins than in a wild duck. Thou hideous
>filth as thou art. Thou idle-headed addicted so and so. Ye screaked and
>ye expelled:
>
>> Mrs. K-Lucifer wrote:
>>
>>> <chucks skeletons>
>>> My Master Lucifer told me to FETCH his slippers and be a good *grrl*.
>
>There go all the claims you made about never reading my posts, DUHanetard.
>
><chucks bone>
>FETCH!
HAHAHA!! She went for the BONE!
--
"Meanwhile, my company is at China, so We can provide you a relative
lost price."
From: "pgtekin" <zhuli...@yahoo.ca>
Message-ID: <1173459156.6...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
Maximum Dog2
<snipped>
<G>
BTW, tell old Ham-Man that you have no *package*, you need a tampon
change every now and then and he should stop sucking on it. However, you
could be to old now and your producing could be.
Maximum Dog2
<correction>
<BTW, tell old Ham-Man that you have no *package*, you need a tampon
change every now and then and he should stop sucking on it. However, you
could be to old now and your producing days could be over.>
<BTW, you use to be a lot better at your game. I guess you're just a
dried up old hag now.>
<You're tiresome and no fun anymore, good night.>
Art Deco
>Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>"Home of the dog from Hell"
>"The dogs from Hell coffeeboys are always up for playing fetch!"
>
>"We can repair them, we have the technology, to remove the alien Gray
>giant anal probes from their auk clueless asses, bring in the Bookman
>coffeeboy trained deprober."
Froup sneckage now, brave little napoleon?
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
Kadaitcha Man
Thou minimus. Not shaped for sportive tricks, nor made to court an
amorous looking glass. Ye apple-polished and ye toned:
Don't forget to check for homosexuals under your bed, DUHane.
4Q
!@!@ LOOK, Dustin !@!
It's almost Assembly'er
;]]
4Q
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/ <-- t minus x hours!
Kadaitcha Man
SameAsB4
"4Q" <paul...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173590238....@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Kadaitcha Man has 25% of your IQ.
Art Deco
>Art Deco wrote:
>bellboy mother
>
>Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>"Home of the auk fake award really Big Whoppers"
>> Bart Devo
>>
>> Froup sneckage now, Captain napoleon? I can go fan dog fetch some more
>> groups for you.
>>
>
>Darth Devo: Join with us Science Officers, and together we'll rule the
>auk bellboy latrines.
little napoleon bravely runs away again.
SameAsB4
SameAsB4
"Art Deco" <er...@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:100320072238247175%er...@caballista.org...
Are you just getting used to saying that over and over?
Maximum Dog3
Maximum Dog3
> If my parents had checked for homosexuals under their bed before they got ziggy with each other,
> I would not be here and that would have been a good thing. It didn't happen and I am a plague.
Porsche Monkey For Life
Dog dribbled:
> Kadaitcha Woman a hag a worthless no count hag wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> <You're just a worthless dramatics dancer and a hag that should retire,
> but you're just too stupid to do it.>
>
> <Let me remind you as to just what you are.>
>
> <http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/The_Kadaitcha_Dancers>
>
> <plank>
Then allow me to remind you of whom *you* are:
Kookle Search Results
4 matches for "Duane".
Duane Arnold
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, September 2006
Busted Urinal Award
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet
Goofy Azzed Babboon
http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=Duane
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21
The original "Henry Schmidt"
COOSN-029-06-71069
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131>
================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew
So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.
Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
Grading scale follows questions.
Have they ever :
1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*
4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own*
condition/behavior. (**)
12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.
13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.
In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.
4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
7. Defended a well known kook.
8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
4. Mail-bombed anyone.
5. Spammed a newsgroup.
6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.
7. Lost an account due to abuse.
8. Won a kook award.
9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)
(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)
10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.
11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.
12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.
13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.
14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?
(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.
(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.
Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.
11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.
26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.
36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.
51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.
Dustin Cook
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > On Mar 9, 10:31 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> > > > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org> wrote
> > > > in messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
> > > > > <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_9kgqn7DQ
> > > > > </music>
>
> > > > > The time has come to announce the winners of the February 2007 Usenet
> > > > > Kook Awards. Envelopes, please!
>
> > > > <snipped>
>
> > > > > JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
>
> > > > > The winner is...DUSTIN "DUSTBIN" COOK!
>
> > > > > 14 votes Dustin "Dustbin" Cook
> > > > > 05 votes Michael "Howdy/Trumpet of the Lord" Schmidt
> > > > > 03 votes Double-A
> > > > > 02 votes None of the above
>
> > > > > Congratulations, Dustbin! I see you still haven't gotten over Rhonda
> > > > > and K-Man. Pathetic.
>
> > > > Yayyyyyyyyyyy! Dustin.
>
> > > Well done Dustin!
>
> > Thanks, 4Q.
>
> YouR'e wellcum
>
>
>
> > > I knew that tagging you was going to
> > > be worthwhile. I'll try and upload as
>
> > Indeed, it would seem to be amusing for both sides. Here's a more
> > accurate url for your greetings in the new .nfo release files.
> > Anything else you'd like added? :) The typo is intentional, btw. :)
>
> >http://www.bitenova.nl/tt/355yv
>
> I don't know what the fuck you are going
> on about. Smoke less crack, dude :/
You don't? You should try clicking on the url before you suggest i'm
the one with a crack problem.
I said you were greeted in the new .nfo files, and you are.. If you
click the link and scroll to the bottom (where the greets is) your
stupid ass would see it.
Now, please, put the crack pipe down. Goto rehab or something if you
must.
> Meanwhile back to the usenet archives,
Another empty promise.
Where is the report on BugHunter you promised several weeks ago now?
Where is the BugScanner you promised several weeks ago now?
Where is the proof of BugHunter being a trojan you previously claimed
it is? your attempt to backpeddle and say well, it will be when the
time is right didn't go unnoticed, fish.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool v2.2
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Kadaitcha Man
bat-fowling devilish slave. Thou herring without a roe. Thou dumb,
droning false-professor. Ye reproved and ye dripped:
> <????????>
<aside>
DUHane gets breviloquent about himself.
Kadaitcha Man
foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold. I will
chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye fawned:
> Another empty promise.
[QUOTE]
It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
"BAWAHAHA"
[/QUOTE]
Dustfart k0oK in Message-ID: <Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
miguel
> miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> Thou theme of all our scorns. Thou
> dog-hearted, shrill-gorged fruit bat. Thou begrimed soft-bellied toad.
> Thou befogged friend of an ill fashion. Ye sickened and ye fussed:
>
>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>> miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> Thou base bondsman. Ill-met by moonlight.
>>> Thou figure pedantical. Thou is open to incontinency. Ye gagged and
>>> ye meowed:
>>>
>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>> miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> Thou measureless liar. Thou callow,
>>>>> pork-bellied rank-scented meiny. Thou dam. Thou greasy, blue-haired
>>>>> fever blister. Ye fussed and ye proscribed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I pretty much matched Kali in output word for word.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would that say about her posts?
>>>>> Meh. cranston tries for a narcissism hit by stealth.
>>>> Translation: He shoots! He scores!
>>> #1.
>>>
>>>> hth he-bitch
>>> #4.
>>>
>>>> miguel
>>> 1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
>>> etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
>>> delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
>>> around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
>>> 2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
>>> 3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
>>> edit, context snip, etc.
>>> 4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister,
>>> brother, father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged,
>>> retard, jackass, newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring,
>>> asswipe, loser, child, village idiot, immature, paedophile,
>>> head > groin, fuck you, fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur,
>>> nigger, inmate etc. 5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine,
>>> vagina, bodily
>>> excretions, masturbation etc.
>>> 6. blink (clueless)
>>> 7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
>>> 8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
>>> 9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
>>> hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
>>> 10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
>>>
>>> Your score so far:
>>>
>>> 2.
>>> 3. #
>>> 4. ###
>>> 5.
>>> 6. #
>>> 7. ##
>>> 8.
>>> 9.
>>> 10.
>>>
>>>
>> Good work there he-bitch.
>
> #4.
>
>> Can you go back over my past 10 years of posting and make
>> up a scorecard?
>
> #3.
>
>> I've got to head out for awhile,
>
> #9.
>
>> but
>> I'll look forward to seeing your research when I return.
>
> #9.
>
>> hth he-bitch
>
> 1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
> etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
> delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
> around. You are obsessed. YHBT. Monkey see, monkey do.
> 2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
> 3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
> edit, context snip, etc.
> 4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
> father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
> newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
> village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
> fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
> 5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
> excretions, masturbation etc.
> 6. blink (clueless)
> 7. Nazi, MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
> 8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
> 9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
> hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
> 10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke, Autoflame.
>
> Your score so far:
>
> 2.
> 3. ##
> 4. ####
> 5.
> 6. #
> 7. ##
> 8.
> 9. ##
> 10. #
>
> Plus the #10 you weren't awarded for your earlier autoflame.
>
> 5 posts, 15 lames. "Read cranston. 3 lames in every post!"
>
I'd say the Hammer of Thor needs re-tempering badly.
Kadaitcha Man
repent the tedious minutes I with thee have spent. Thou jarring ruinous
butt. Thou cockeyed crab-tree. Ye burbled and ye quacked:
> I'd say<BITCHSLAP>
Perhaps you mistook me for someone who gives a fuck about what you say.
> the Hammer of Thor needs re-tempering badly.
--
Maximum Dog3
<snipped>
<What was it before?>
Maximum Dog3
<snipped>
<Maybe that's Spammy-man and not Hammy-man and you don't like spam.>
Art Deco
>Dustin Cook <bughunte...@gmail.com> Thou side-piercing sight. Thou
>foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold. I will
>chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye fawned:
>
>> Another empty promise.
>
>[QUOTE]
>It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
>have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
>of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
>group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
>bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
>"BAWAHAHA"
>[/QUOTE]
>
>Dustfart k0oK in Message-ID: <Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
ubercoder dustbin k0oK failed in his promise to reduce AUK to a smoking
crater. So sad.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
news:1173596417.2...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com
No. He's "greated."
> If you
> click the link and scroll to the bottom (where the greets is) your
> stupid ass would see it.
He reads it, and what happens? He blows up?
> Now, please, put the crack pipe down. Goto rehab or something if you
> must.
Wow! That was really...um...
What are you on about now, Dustin?
>> Meanwhile back to the usenet archives,
>
> Another empty promise.
>
> Where is the report on BugHunter you promised several weeks ago now?
> Where is the BugScanner you promised several weeks ago now?
> Where is the proof of BugHunter being a trojan you previously claimed
> it is? your attempt to backpeddle and say well, it will be when the
> time is right didn't go unnoticed, fish.
The current pace seems just about right for this time of year.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phčdre nó Delaunay
miguel
Well you did care enough to do several iterations of your incredibly
stupid checklist lame. That says something, he-bitch.
Kadaitcha Man
of baboons. Thou worm's meat. Thou mouse. Ye chided and ye tattled:
> Kadaitcha Man <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dustin Cook <bughunte...@gmail.com> Thou side-piercing sight.
>> Thou foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold. I
>> will chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye fawned:
>>
>>> Another empty promise.
>>
>> [QUOTE]
>> It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really.
>> I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a
>> cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to
>> make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why
>> nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming
>> engine.. "BAWAHAHA"
>> [/QUOTE]
>>
>> Dustfart k0oK in Message-ID:
>> <Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
>
> ubercoder dustbin k0oK failed in his promise to reduce AUK to a
> smoking crater. So sad.
Hell, he failed so miserably he didn't even get started.
Kadaitcha Man
infectious slipper and subtle knave. Thou bacon-fed knave. Thou
folly-fallen, self-centred infidel. Ye bellyached and ye ululated:
Correction. It's a checklist of your incredibly stupid lames.
>>> the Hammer of Thor needs re-tempering badly.
--
Kadaitcha Man
rampaging fool, to brag and stamp and swear. Thou horse's feedbag. Thou
tardy-gaited, spur-galled scorn of women. Ye gnarred and ye groused:
> Kadaitcha Man inspired greatness with:
>
>> Maximum Dog <Maxim...@Dog.com> Thou white-livered and red-faced
>> slug. There is no more valour in that Poins than in a wild duck.
>> Thou hideous filth as thou art. Thou idle-headed addicted so and so.
>> Ye screaked and ye expelled:
>>
>>> Mrs. K-Lucifer wrote:
>>>
>>>> <chucks skeletons>
>>>> My Master Lucifer told me to FETCH his slippers and be a good
>>>> *grrl*.
>>
>> There go all the claims you made about never reading my posts,
>> DUHanetard.
>>
>> <chucks bone>
>> FETCH!
>
>
> HAHAHA!! She went for the BONE!
You expected something other than a Pavlovian response from one of my pet
kooks?
Maximum Dog3
4Q
> On Mar 10, 2:46 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > Dustin Cook wrote:
> > > On Mar 9, 10:31 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> > > > > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org> wrote
> > > > > in messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
<snip>
Shut up Dusttard you fucking mumbling koOK.
Kadaitcha Man
headed ape. A weasel hath not such a deal of spleen as you are tossed
with. Thou errant equivocal companion. Thou fat unpaved eunuch. Ye
lectured and ye agonised:
> Ham-man wrote:
>>
>> <plonk> That is a hard plonk, and I don't even kill K-man.
>>
>> goodbye.
>
> Really? You should brush your teeth and wash Mrs. K-Lucifer's ass
> before you pucker up and kiss it.
You know, DUHane, sometimes you say the sweetest things.
Dustin Cook
And it's monday.. 6:42pm eastern time, and yet, no updates on your
site either... It's still the same!
No Bugscanner (now weeks behind promised released date), No Bughunter
report or disassembly done by you, nada, nothing. You have promised
all of these things, and have yet to deliver. And you call me a
kook...
Did you see the "greating"? *grin*. I don't know how many releases
will get done this year, but you can practically imagine the jokes
your going to be the guest of honor in the nfo files. Fuck man, people
might leech the .nfo file to laugh about your pathetically lame
ass. :-) You know, Satire... :P We just have a wider audience of
viewers than yourself. Thousands of terrabytes as opposed to you..
LOL!
C'mon 4Q, it's time for you to make good on your promises.
Don't let your kookologist fans down!
They are trolling on your behalf, don't make them all look as stupid
as you.
--
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Dustin Cook
> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> Thou side-piercing sight. Thou
> foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold. I will
> chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye fawned:
>
> > Another empty promise.
>
> [QUOTE]
> It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
> have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
> of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
> group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
> bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
> "BAWAHAHA"
> [/QUOTE]
Hi k-bitch,
Why don't you explain how I could do something as to mean the same as
that I am going to do something... You are a master of the english
language, I'm interested in your spin on this. Oh but wait, your the
same wanker who can't even get asic code syntax right, but certainly
offers to replace functional code (mine) with yours (which wouldn't
work on a snowy day in hell). Your a complete and utter fucking
jackass.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Mar 11, 2:18 am, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> Thou side-piercing sight.
>> Thou foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold. I
>> will chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye fawned:
>>
>>> Another empty promise.
>>
>> [QUOTE]
>> It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really.
>> I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a
>> cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to
>> make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why
>> nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming
>> engine.. "BAWAHAHA"
>> [/QUOTE]
>
> Hi k-bitch,
>
> Why don't you explain how I could do something as to mean the same as
> that I am going to do something...
Huh?
> You are a master of the english
> language, I'm interested in your spin on this. Oh but wait, your the
> same wanker who can't even get asic code syntax right, but certainly
> offers to replace functional code (mine) with yours (which wouldn't
> work on a snowy day in hell). Your a complete and utter fucking
> jackass.
The similarity between you and me is we both know what you do for a
living.
The difference between you and me is only I know what he does for a
living.
It would therefore be my informed opinion that the jackass in this
thread lives not in Australia, but in Tennessee.
How's your mom?
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Mar 11, 1:29 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> On Mar 10, 2:46 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 9, 10:31 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org>
>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>> messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Shut up Dusttard you fucking mumbling koOK.
>>
>> 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
>
>
> And it's monday.. 6:42pm eastern time, and yet, no updates on your
> site either... It's still the same!
> No Bugscanner (now weeks behind promised released date), No Bughunter
> report or disassembly done by you, nada, nothing. You have promised
> all of these things, and have yet to deliver. And you call me a
> kook...
You're a kook.
4Q is a lazy fucker, but he's not a kook.
See the difference?
> Did you see the "greating"? *grin*. I don't know how many releases
> will get done this year, but you can practically imagine the jokes
Jokes?
> your going to be the guest of honor in the nfo files.
What am I missing?
> Fuck man, people
> might leech the .nfo file to laugh about your pathetically lame
> ass. :-) You know, Satire... :P We just have a wider audience of
> viewers than yourself. Thousands of terrabytes as opposed to you..
> LOL!
Dustin...are you off your meds?
> C'mon 4Q, it's time for you to make good on your promises.
> Don't let your kookologist fans down!
He isn't.
> They are trolling on your behalf, don't make them all look as stupid
> as you.
<laughing>
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Kadaitcha Man
patchery. Thou strange serpent. Thou jealous o'erworn widow. Ye sent out
and ye regurgitated:
> On Mar 11, 11:14 am, Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
>> Kadaitcha Man <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> Thou side-piercing sight.
>>> Thou foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold.
>>> I will chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye
>>> fawned:
>>
>>>> Another empty promise.
>>
>>> [QUOTE]
>>> It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet.
>>> Really. I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks
>>> into a cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so
>>> high as to make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do
>>> this, why nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate
>>> spamming engine.. "BAWAHAHA"
>>> [/QUOTE]
>>
>>> Dustfart k0oK in Message-ID:
>>> <Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD...@69.28.186.121>
>>
>> ubercoder dustbin k0oK failed in his promise to reduce AUK to a
>> smoking crater.
>
> So me where<BITCHSLAP>
You incompetent, blithering nitwit, Dusfart. Try "Me so so" as in...
Do me me, me so so, re fa fa, la ti ti
Do me me, me so so, re fa fa, la ti ti
When you know the notes to sing,
Do me me, me so so, re fa fa, la ti ti
You can sing most anything,
Doe, a deer, a female deer,
Ray! A drop of golden sun,
Me! A name, I call myself,
Far! A long, long way to run...
The God of Odd Statements
Alright, then I'll just dare you to follow through on your empty claim.
Your words have no teeth in them, and all you will ever do is make
boasts about how 1337 you are. You have neither the guts nor the
know-how to carry out your (implied) threat of flooding AUK with encoded
posts, meaning it'll never be done by you. There. Is that good enough?
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131>
"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS
"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>
"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken
"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'
"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt
"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark
"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: <ochc3.a...@news.alt.net>
"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: <b27b0$45ed14a7$46e3a646$66...@COMTECK.COM>
4Q
> "Dustin Cook" <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1173739489.2...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com
> > On Mar 11, 1:29 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dustin Cook wrote:
> >>> On Mar 10, 2:46 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
> >>>>> On Mar 9, 10:31 am, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrang...@caballista.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote in
> >>>>>>> messagenews:Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> Shut up Dusttard you fucking mumbling koOK.
> >>
> >> 4Qhttp://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
> >
> >
> > And it's monday.. 6:42pm eastern time, and yet, no updates on your
> > site either... It's still the same!
> > No Bugscanner (now weeks behind promised released date), No Bughunter
> > report or disassembly done by you, nada, nothing. You have promised
> > all of these things, and have yet to deliver. And you call me a
> > kook...
>
> You're a kook.
>
> 4Q is a lazy fucker, but he's not a kook.
I'm not lazy, it takes time to read thru
and compile all that abuse & kookthreat
stuff! Sheesh there's loads of it.
http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/Ko0kTHREATS/
>
> See the difference?
>
> > Did you see the "greating"? *grin*. I don't know how many releases
> > will get done this year, but you can practically imagine the jokes
>
> Jokes?
>
> > your going to be the guest of honor in the nfo files.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> > Fuck man, people
> > might leech the .nfo file to laugh about your pathetically lame
> > ass. :-) You know, Satire... :P We just have a wider audience of
> > viewers than yourself. Thousands of terrabytes as opposed to you..
> > LOL!
>
> Dustin...are you off your meds?
>
> > C'mon 4Q, it's time for you to make good on your promises.
> > Don't let your kookologist fans down!
>
> He isn't.
>
> > They are trolling on your behalf, don't make them all look as stupid
> > as you.
>
> <laughing>
Follow the 'About' page, you'll find I've
started a new section (not on main menu yet)
'Stepping_On_His_Dick'... "con-trEadDicK-tion's"
I'm sure his *momma pleazer* must look
like a fucking beavers tail by now with
all his clumsy step-on-dick fuckups.
*lol*
Kadaitcha Man
need no grave to bury honesty, there's not a grain of it the face to
sweeten of the whole dungy earth. Thou impudent strumpet. Thou
revolting, worthless midge. Ye expostulated and ye derided:
>> 4Q is a lazy fucker, but he's not a kook.
>
> I'm not lazy,
<starts scanning intently>
> it takes time to read thru
> and compile all that abuse & kookthreat
> stuff! Sheesh there's loads of it.
<no>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/Ko0kTHREATS/
<no>
> Follow the 'About' page, you'll find I've
> started a new section (not on main menu yet)
> 'Stepping_On_His_Dick'... "con-trEadDicK-tion's"
<no>
> I'm sure his *momma pleazer* must look
> like a fucking beavers tail by now with
> all his clumsy step-on-dick fuckups.
> *lol*
<no>
This is not looking good for you, 4Q...
> 4Q
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dustin_Cook/
<and no>
Ok, you deny being lazy but you don't deny you're not a kook.
<checks tinder in blunderbuss>
<puts feet up>
<sits back and waits patiently for Michael Cranston to pass by>
Don't mind me, 4Q, I'm just huntin' wabbits.
Kadaitcha Man
candle, the better part burnt out. Thou base bondsman. Out of my sight,
thou dost infect mine eyes. Ye chatted and ye ministered:
> On Mar 11, 2:18 am, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> Thou side-piercing sight.
>> Thou foul, good-for-nothing tongueless block. Thou puling cuckold. I
>> will chastise this high minded strumpet. Ye reported and ye fawned:
>>
>>> Another empty promise.
>>
>> [QUOTE]
>> It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really.
>> I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a
>> cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to
>> make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why
>> nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming
>> engine.. "BAWAHAHA"
>> [/QUOTE]
>
> Hi k-bitch,
>
> Why don't you explain how I could do something as to mean the same as
> that I am going to do something... You are a master of the english
> language, I'm interested in your spin on this.
I can do that, but you'll get confused at the first big word, get dizzy and
fall over, just like you always do so there's not much point.
> Oh but wait, your the same wanker
On the subject of wankers, aren't you the wanker who recently released some
malware that destroyed all the Google Earth installations on the PCs of
unsuspecting people?
Still on the subject of wankers, aren't you the wanker who recently accused
me of forging my own email address every time I posted?
Continuing on with your subject of wankers, aren't you the wanker who hauled
his mother's bloated corpse out of its coffin, dragged it down the stairs to
hold it upright at the keyboard without letting it fall over in case it
exploded cadaverine and putrescene all over the walls and used its clammy
hands to make-believe your dead mother was posting a message in your defence
that said something along the lines of, "My Dustin is a very intelligent
boy. Leave him alone!"?
Staying with your idea of wankers, aren't you the wanker who builds then
ferociously attacks his own straw-men with unrelenting criticism, gross
denigration and intransigent denunciation, only to suddenly announce there
is apparently a chicken and egg problem when your savagely beaten straw-men
won't yield to the devastating thumpings you give them?
While I'm on a roll, aren't you the wanker who regularly confuses input with
output, confuses code with instructions, confuses assembly mnemonics with
binary data, has no idea what a native compiler is, and all at the same time
claims to be a 1337 uberprogrammer of great repute and awesome fame?
I'm sure you are.
> who can't even get asic code syntax right, but certainly
> offers to replace functional code (mine) with yours (which wouldn't
> work on a snowy day in hell). Your a complete and utter fucking
> jackass.
You mean code like the following "which wouldn't work on a snowy day in
hell"...?
> a$=string$(24,"+-")
>
> that will do the same as the code above and below.
>
> a$="+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-"
From: "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com>
Date: 24 Feb 2007 22:47:41 -0800
Message-ID: <1172386061.8...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
Hmmm? Well?
Now, as you've still not dealt with the post below, you can take a break
from maliciously destroying Google Earth installations and deal with it now.
It was originally posted on February 25 and you were reminded again on
February 28 that you still had not dealt with it. It is now March 13 and you
are being reminded again. You're not trying avoid it are you, Coward of the
Month award winner that you are?
In news:1172461993.0...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com,
bughunte...@gmail.com <bughunte...@gmail.com> typed:
> On Feb 25, 10:23 pm, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Secondly, Dustfart, and you've been told this time and time again,
>> and still it hasn't sunken in to that massive slab of
>> steel-reinforced concrete you like to call a head; It is neither
>> your decision nor mine to determine the accuracy or otherwise of the
>> accusations of consummate fuckwittery made against you.
>> Your readers will decide. Not you. Not me.
>> Monkey see, monkey do.
>
> So you are a monkey? Can I train you to do more tricks then?
>
>> Dustfart, if the same principle were applied to you and all your
>> usenet posts, you'd be the world's loneliest poster. Hell, even
>> drive-by spammers would get more acknowledgement of their existence.
>
> Your primary existance on usenet is alt.usenet.kooks, who are you to
> make statements with regard to anyone else?
>
>> You incompetent fuckhead. Code is what you write; or in your case,
>> scribble. Instructions are what compilers produce.
>
> You somehow think symantics is going to save you now?
Dustfart, programming is a precise science, an art even. If you cannot line
up your ducks to support your scurrilous claim to be a programmer then that
is entirely your problem.
The fact remains, no programmer that I have ever worked with or known since
I started in the computer industry in 1976 has ever, read that again, no
programmer that I have ever worked with or known since I started in the
computer industry in 1976, and actively work in to this very day, has ever,
ever, not even once, 1. Confused input with output, 2. Confused code with
instructions, 3. Confused assembly mnemonics with binary data. Yet there you
are, claiming to be a 1337 uberprogrammer of great repute and awesome fame,
and in post after post after post you persistently do all three and all at
fucking once.
Semantics has nothing to do with you being a worthless, over-inflated bag of
gas, Dusftart.
>>> Your assembler<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> Assembly, Dustfart. Assembly. I, being highly skilled in
>> programming, write Assembly. You, being the dribbling fuckwit that
>> you are are the one who dabbles about with "assembler".
>
> If you think not being able to get an asic syntax correct is a
> demonstration of highly skilled programming, I have some nice ocean
> front property in arizona I'd like to sell you.
That straw-man was burnt alive some time ago, Dustfart. You cannot ressurect
it...
Quick critique <> correction.
>> Oh, someone else wrote a program that displays "Hello, FuckNuts
>> Dusfart!"?
>
> Are you intentionally evading the point? Are we going to get so
> nitpicky that were going to bitch if asicc strings are different?
> Geeze..
Again, you context snipped so I'll take that your question as being
rhetorical, albeit inadvertant on your part.
>> <snippage of stuff you ignored and did not reply to, yet again>
>
> That seems to be something we're both guilty of. Lets face it, some
> things you comment on aren't worth a response.
Don't try and drag me into your quagmire, Dustfart. It won't work. Now,
please point to one solitary example of ignoring and not replying. Thank
you.
>>> Because I've disassembled the resulting binary files created with
>>> the language. Asic isn't p-code nor is it interpreted.
>>
>> Well, fuck me dead, Dustfart. You've made a major discovery there.
>> Do you
>
> You don't know the cracking scene either? It's a rhetorical question.
> If you had, you'd already know i'm not bad at reverse engineering. Oh
> wait, doh, I am supporting a malware removal tool, of course I can
> reverse engineer... Silly me.
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
>> suppose it could be possible that if you disassembled every natively
>> compiled executable ever compiled by every native complier available
>> that you'd identify a correlation so undeniable that you could state
>> with some
>
> I've done alot of diassemblies from HLL compilers, and yes, many of
> them produce p-code. Asic doesn't.
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
> I'm getting bored with defending the reasons I write software
Consistent failure will do that, Dustin.
> in asic
> tho... It reminds me of the av/vx wars of yesteryear. Only, they
> understood eventually.
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
>> certainty that all native compilers produce binary files that are not
>> interpreted and are not p-code?
>
> What are you calling a native compiler in this aspect?
Results 1 - 100 of about 1,150,000 English pages for native compiler. (0.26
seconds)
Pardon me for a moment please...
1. Confuses Assembly with "assembler" [sic]
2. Confuses code with instructions
3. Confuses input with output
4. Maintians that ASIC BASIC is close to "assembler" [sic]
5. Asserts that a$=string$(24,"+-") does something in ASIC BASIC
that it does not do...
6. Tacitly admits to having less foresight than a squirrel
7. Uses shifty dodging, weaving and ducking to disguise his
complete lack of all capability and sense.
[scribbles...]
8. Has no idea what native compiler means.
>> The alert reader will note that not only have you conflated code with
>> instructions, you just tried to conflate reverse-engineered
>> instructions represented by assembly mnemonics into ASIC BASIC.
>
> The alert reader already knows I'm just feeding trolls at this point.
> I'm basically screwing off killing a little bit of time, and smashing
> on you here in usenet. But at the end of the day, I know that you
> don't personally give a rats ass what I say anymore than I do about
> what you say. It's for the audience that we even bother trading shots.
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
> One of us has to get the last word in...
>
>>> K-man, You were not even able to properly comment on very simple
>>> code, of course you would try the "well, you have a strawman"
>>> defense. Face it, I've beaten you. You jumped before you looked.
>>
>> Your delusional opinion counts for what, exactly, Dustfart?
>
> Admission of the fact accepted.
I already told you. That straw-man was set alight a long time ago. You
cannot now try to ressurect it. I can understand you fooling yourself into
believeing you can get away with it once in a post, but twice? Pffft.
Quick critique <> correction.
The question stands. Answer it.
Your delusional opinion counts for what, exactly, Dustfart?
>> Well then, you're just going to have to force yourself to show, step
>> by woefully laborious step, how it is that this code indicates just
>> "how close asic really is to assembler [sic]"...
>
> you already know what i meant by the statement, we're simply going
> round and round now.
>>>> That would be assembler [sic] code put there by the compiler, yes?
>>>> You know, "code" that you did not actually write. Oh, and the
>>>> completely straw-man
>>
>>> Well, short of writing everything in machine language, you can't
>>> actually claim anybody has authored anything original, and even
>>> then....
>>
>> Woah! Back up there a moment, retard...
>
> Backing up...
>
>> Who made any claim even remotely resembling "writing everything in
>> machine language, you can't actually claim anybody has authored
>> anything original"?
>
> Do you have trouble reading what you wrote or something?
The question stands, like all rest of the unanswered questions. Answer it.
Who made any claim even remotely resembling "writing everything in
machine language, you can't actually claim anybody has authored
anything original"?
>>>> That would be assembler [sic] code put there by the compiler, yes?
>>>> You know, "code" that you did not actually write.
>
> Your breaking little twigs at this point, but I'll bite. You made the
> statement that the compiler makes code I didn't write, I responded by
> saying unless you do everything by hand in pure machine language, your
> statement claims nobody's code is their own, it's the work of the
> programmers who wrote the compiler. We seem to have a chicken and egg
> problem if that's the case.
There is no chicken and egg, Dustfart. All there is is yet another one of
your immolated straw-men lying in a forlorn pile of carbon giving off smoke.
The record clearly shows that you set out from the claim of 'asic is like
assembler' and then proceeded to take the input of ASIC BASIC and fool
yourself into believing that the compiled output somehow proved your utterly
fuckwitted position that a brick is like a nerf ball.
I have news for you, Dustfart. You can try that pathetic Svengali card trick
of yours on any native compiler, not just ASIC BASIC, and still draw the
same fuckwitted and completely wrong conclusion. So, to extrapolate the
demented idiocy of your fuckwitted notions to their logical conclusion...
'asic is like assembler'
'APL is like assembler'
'Forth is like assembler'
'Algol is like assembler'
'C is like assembler'
'Java is like assembler'
'Pascal is like assembler'
'FORTRAN is like assembler'
'PL/1 is like assembler'
'asic is like assembler'
'Smalltalk is like assembler'
'Postscript is like assembler'
So, fucktard, why doesn't everyone just use "assembler" [sic]?
>> The point under discussion here, which must have gone right through
>> one of those shotgun wounds in your head, is this:
>>
>> The ASIC BASIC code is very close to Assembly code.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are beating a dead horse dude.
Yeah, you.
> The resulting binary is close to what you would have gotten in
> assembly<BITCHSLAP>
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
>, is what I meant,
I repeat: Programming is a precise science.
> and it's what you knew I meant.
Salve your battered conscience in whatever manner you like, Dustfart, I will
merely point to the mounting pile of evidence to your delusional state and
ask you to cough up some proof to support your claim that a highly skilled
software developer might actually be able to make sense out of the
discombobulated balderdash you toss about.
> Now, can you find something that's
> actually worth trading shots over?
Not so fast, dustfart. I'm not letting you off until I see coffin maggots
emerge from your decrepit corpse.
You have claimed to be a programmer of great repute and fame and you persist
in claiming to be a programmer when the truth is you are nothing of the
sort. There are unanswered questions that you must attend to. get to them.
All of them.
>> That is a paraphrase of your claim. It has already been established
>> that you do not know the difference between input and ouput, and
>> that you do not know the difference between code and instructions.
>> And it has already been
>
> It's a desperate attempt to save face on your part, actually.
>
>> established that, following on from your failure to understand the
>> difference between code and instructions, that you believe machine
>> instructions are code.
>
> Assembly languages use mnemonic codes to refer to machine code
> instructions. Such a more readable rendition of the machine language
> is called an assembly language and consists of both numbers and simple
> words whereas machine code is composed only of numbers, usually
> represented in either binary or hexadecimal.
>
> For example, on the Zilog Z80 processor, the machine code 00000101
> causes the CPU to decrement the B processor register. In assembly
> language this would be written as DEC B.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_code
ALL HAIL TEH WIKI!!!, eh, Dustfart. So, I guess that settles it then, eh.
You can post quotes from the wiki therefore you are a programmer of great
fame and exceeding repute. FNAR! You blithering fuckstick; you've shot
yourself in the head, yet again...
> Still want to debate over symantics? Or will you try to spin what you
> said?
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
Read the first sentence of your precious wiki extract, Dustfart.
Now read this:
[QUOTE]
> Well anyways, when
> asic compiles the binary, the resulting assembler code assigns
No, Dustfart. The assembler [sic] code is the input to the compiler, not the
output.
[/QUOTE]
And this:
[QUOTE]
> Actually, it won't. The assembler code is referenced via jmp
> statements in the executable.
lol - so what exactly do you think a JMP is? Something other than "assembler
code" [sic] referenced in the executable?
And since when has any assembler [sic] statement been referenceable in an
executable, Dustfart?
JMP <--- That, Dustfart, is the mnemonic for an assembler [sic] JMP
statement.
E9 <--- That, Dustfart, is unsigned hexadecimal opcode, which is
the result of compiling an assembler [sic] JMP statement.
[/QUOTE]
And this:
[QUOTE]
CODE <> INSTRUCTIONS
[/QUOTE]
And _especially_ this:
[QUOTE]
Ceteris paribus, your pervasive confusion between CODE and INSTRUCTIONS,
and binary OUTPUT with ASIC BASIC INPUT could stand alone as testament to
the truth.
[/QUOTE]
>> The implication that I do not know the difference is
>> proven false and the reverse is true, viz it is you
>> who knows nothing.
>
> Ehh, incorrect.
<pours petrol on yet another Dustfart-created straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
Not your decision. That straw-man was turned to carbon a long time ago,
Dustfart.
>> Taken together, your ineptitude and lack of ability are so immense
>> that you do not have the wits about you to even think of trying to
>> pull off a slimy card trick, let alone get caught doing it, so my
>> money is on implication 2.
>>
>
> Well, I do know the common term, machine code. :)
Well, you do now. I should bill you for all the lessons.
Oh, btw, you seem to have fooled yourself into believing you actually stood
a chance of getting away with hacking out bits you don't like so I'll just
make sure you're aware that you can't. Like I said, you can only fool
yourself all of the time, Dustin. You snipped and did not reply to any of
the following from the post you replied to. Please attend to it; there's a
jolly good chap...
Ceteris paribus, your pervasive confusion between CODE and INSTRUCTIONS,
and binary OUTPUT with ASIC BASIC INPUT could stand alone as testament to
the truth.
>> assembler [sic] code that we're not actually dicussing because we're
>> really talking about the ASIC BASIC compiler that does not include
>> support for assembly language mnemonics, yes?
>
> It doesn't?
No, it doesn't. Perhaps you would like to quote vast tracts of the manual
again showing exactly where support for assembly language mnemonics is
documented while proving the exact opposite?
> Strange... According to the documentation, I'm free to write
> supporting functions in whatever language I desire (assembler
> recommended). Asic doesn't have more than 80 commands in the entire
> language. To allow for expandability, it supports you adding
> additional code to your program written with more advanced languages
> to do things not already available to you.
Let us grant, for the sake of argument only, that it is true that "[you are]
free to write supporting functions in whatever language [you] desire".
Now, from that granted assumption, please explain, in your best spluttering
drool, why it is not the case that "the ASIC BASIC compiler that does not
include support for assembly language mnemonics."
Thank you.
PS: Your audience awaits more of your shifty footwork. get to it.
Let me know if the mental dexterity required to invert the logical negation
of a plain English sentence expressed in the negative gives you a headache,
Dustfart. I'll fix it for you.
<reloads shotgun>
>> A) Claim 'asic is really close is to assembler' when the actual
>> reality is that it isn't
>
> Ahh, but the final output executable<BITCHSLAP>
Code is input. Your claim is that the code 'is really close is to
assembler'.
Once more, for the perpetually stupid, we are dealing with input,
Dustfart, not output.
> present on your hard disk after
> asic has "compiled" it closely matches that of your resulting
> assembler file (well, depending on your sloppyness level...). Asic
> isn't p-code kook, it generates some unncessary code but not much.
Output <> Input
Code <> Instructions
ASIC BASIC <> "assmebler" [sic]
HTH
>> B) You habitually refer to assembly as assembler
>
>
>> C) You do not know the difference between an opcode and its mnemonic;
>> indeed, it is verifiably provable that you believe that the
>> mnemonics are referenced in the executable.
>
> Yes I do. You forget, The criterr.obj file posted is a patched
> variant.
What evidence do you have to support the claim that I forgot anything about
the "criterr.obj file posted"?
In order to support your claim, you are going to have to show that I knew
about, let alone fucking cared about, the "criterr.obj file posted", you
stupidly presumptuous cuntplug.
> Obviously I know what the various mnemonic statements
> translate to. For example, retf is CB. Mnemonics is for you to
> remember things, it's one step below machine language; you keying in
> the hex yourself.
The available empirical evidence does not indicate what you now claim is
the obvious.
>> And you say you're a programmer, huh?
>
> Yes, that I am. BugHunter clearly demonstrates this. Have you seen it
> recently?
<pours high-octane petroleum on Dustfart's latest straw-man>
<strikes match>
<FOOF!>
At best, the available empirical evidence indicates that you are nothing
more than a fuckwitted dabbler who lacks the necessary logical turn of mind
to cut proper code.
At worst, the available empirical evidence indicates that you are a
self-immersed and utterly delusional lying cur who rightly belongs under
intensive treatment in a mental institution.
You know, Dustfart, whenever I read your posts, I get the feeling that your
parents must surely have rued the day that lobotomies were outlawed. Yours
would be the only case in history where a full lobotomy ever resulted in an
improvement in cognitive ability.
>>> if it's going to be used more than once, it should be a routine. Why
>>> repeat the same code?
>>
>> DUH! So, why isn't it, Dustfart...?
>
> I agreed with your statement concerning the fact it should have been
> and I didn't make it so. Why do you think your going to misquote what
> was said now? :)
Real meaning: 20-20 hindsight.
Your hindsight is so keen that I am forced to wonder if you eyes in your
arse.
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
>> Don't tell me. Let me guess...
>>
>> "just lazy..."
>
> Your laughing at your own intentional misquotation?
Seeing as you got caught in yet another inept context snip I'll merely point
to the body of evidence that says you're a delusional fucktard and leave it
at that.
>> Of course, an utter lack of capability on your part has nothing to
>> do with it at all, right?
>
> Well, I don't know.
Sure you know. Deep down you do know. Your delusional state prevents you
from acknowledging it though.
>. I understand what I'm doing with asic code, and
> you don't seem to know what is going on. You seem to think you can
> correct my code for me or something, but you can't even get the
> language syntax right... You have to understand why I think that's so
> damn funny. You know just as well as I do that most of our readers
> aren't in fact programmers and might lap up whatever you have to say
> purely on faith, but you have to consider one important thing. Some
> others here are programmers and aren't fooled by your little games.
Let's break that down into more manageable chunks:
> you don't seem
> You seem to think
> you can't even
> You have to understand
> You know just as well as I do
> purely on faith
> you have to consider
Ok, but have you got any facts to go on?
As for this...
"You know just as well as I do that most of our readers aren't in fact
programmers and might lap up whatever you have to say purely on faith"
I sincerely doubt your capacity to have thought about that until it was told
to you. Nevertheless if it is true that "most of our readers aren't in fact
programmers and might lap up whatever [I] have to say purely on faith" then
that's not my problem. It's yours, entirely, and I refuse to deal with it.
You deal with it, Dustfart. It's your problem.
As for "our readers", this show is all about you, Dustfart. You and you
only. I am merely the puppeteer pulling your strings from up in the loft.
>> Dustfart, you need a seriously hard kick in the reality glands.
>> First of all, compilers produce output in a predictible manner. That
>> is to say, when you put your garbage code into the compiler, what
>> comes out is, lo and behold, compiled garbage. A BASIC compiler will
>> not fix your crap, inefficient code, Dustfart; it will only produce
>> a crap, inefficient program.
>
> When you learn the language syntax, and get several years of actual
> hands on experience programming in it, then I might consider your
> advice as something more than somebody talking out of turn.
So, what depth of knowledge of "the language syntax" and how many "years
of actual hands on experience programming in" ASIC BASIC did it take to
make the following cockup...?
> a$=string$(24,"+-")
>
> that will do the same as the code above and below.
>
> a$="+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-"
Hmm? Well?
>> Secondly, Dustfart, let us assume, for the sake of supposition only,
>> that everything I have written, plus all the evidence placed before
>> you to refute your insane lies is 100 percent pure, unadulterated,
>> irrefutable bullshit. Yes, let us assume that everything I have
>> written is 100% techno-poppycock.
>
> Oh, no real assumption here. It's obvious to everyone what's going on.
> 4Q is failing miserably, are you the reinforcement? I've made my
> points several times over, this was just salt on your wounds.
> language syntax? c'mon.. Your "corrected" one line code example would
> generate an error, because it's not right, idiot. Mine is.
Would you mind showing, using, say, a join the dots picture of a bunny
rabbit, how your wild imagination managed to run up the ladder of inference
like a rat up a drainpipe and get from a wholly valid supposition into
"BRING ON THE CAVALRY!!!!" in a single leap.
In your best scribble, please. And no drool.
Thank you.
>> So, Dustfart, based on that assumption, do you believe that your
>> readers are more inclined to fall for the techno-gobbledegook
>> bullshit than they are, say, to fall for the delusional ramblings of
>> an utterly inept fuckwit who puffs up his horribly sunken chest and
>> declares, "it's not quiet [sic] basic... I will tear K-man to shreds
>> :) blah blah. Your loss. :) Ehhhehh.. Heh, the code is written in
>> asic. I don't think you quiet [sic] understand what asic is"?
The unanswered question to the wholly valid supposition stands. Answer it.
Do you believe that your readers are more inclined to fall for the
techno-gobbledegook bullshit than they are, say, to fall for the delusional
ramblings of an utterly inept fuckwit who puffs up his horribly sunken chest
and declares, "it's not quiet [sic] basic... I will tear K-man to shreds :)
blah blah. Your loss. :) Ehhhehh.. Heh, the code is written in asic. I don't
think you quiet [sic] understand what asic is"?
cmsix
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:et4lod$r2m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
Mine's dead, but thanks for asking. I just dropped in to help you with the
cascade.
cmsix
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
> willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
>
Rhonda Lea Kirk
news:40EJh.5242$Um6....@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net
I'm sorry.
> but thanks for asking. I just dropped in to help you
> with the cascade.
I'll take all the help I can get.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phčdre nó Delaunay