Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: New Ad-Aware update for real?

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

1PW

unread,
Oct 14, 2009, 3:06:12 PM10/14/09
to
May...@earthlink.net wrote:
> Is the New Ad-Aware update for real and is it worth doing?
> I'm currently using the Anniversary version.

No evidence exists that it is not "real".

It's too early to judge the effectiveness of the new engine features.
It would be best to employ a blend of separate protective solutions
till more facts surface. Eventually you will either need to upgrade
or abandon anyway.

While adequately protected with other spyware solutions, why not
seriously field test with us and post your impressions in a few months?

Your serious thoughts, with those of others, would be quite welcome.

--
1PW

Message has been deleted

1PW

unread,
Oct 15, 2009, 5:25:50 PM10/15/09
to
May...@earthlink.net wrote:
> First impressions-
> It is very slooo oooo ooo oo ow and I un and re-installed it to see if it
> made a difference. Did some. The old version took about 10 min to do a
> smart scan - this one takes about 12+ on my system. Very slow to start.
>
>
> It has some NEW auto delete feature --????? Found no option to turn that
> off and the flash screen was gone before I could read it. Would one no
> longer be given a choice of deleting, quarantine etc?
>
> When I ran it for the first time it found NO items.
>
> It appears to remain free.

If at some point you are unable to tolerate Ad-Aware, many of us have
moved on to the superior MBAM & SAS.

If you haven't already discovered them, you could give their freeware
versions a try:

MBAM: <http://www.malwarebytes.org/>
SAS: <http://www.superantispyware.com/>

--
1PW

Message has been deleted

1PW

unread,
Oct 15, 2009, 8:53:18 PM10/15/09
to
May...@earthlink.net wrote:
> Thanks,
> How about AVG - FREE 'officially' compatible with Win7?
>
> I'm contemplating it for my new i7-940

The AVG web site says their free version is compatible with Windows 7.

--
1PW

Message has been deleted

1PW

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 2:44:34 AM10/16/09
to
May...@earthlink.net wrote:
> Correct - but is this the one to get for win7 in your valued opinion?

Respectfully no. I would use Avira's AntiVir Personal with Windows 7.

However, you must be cognizant of /all/ your antimalware needs along
with your system's total security protection requirements.

--
1PW

Message has been deleted

1PW

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 6:23:54 PM10/16/09
to
May...@earthlink.net wrote:
>>> Correct - but is this the one to get for win7 in your valued opinion?
>> Respectfully no. I would use Avira's AntiVir Personal with Windows 7.
>>
>> However, you must be cognizant of /all/ your antimalware needs along
>> with your system's total security protection requirements.
>
> "My needs" - not sure what or how they would differ from anybody else's?

As a /generality/ that's very true indeed.

> My PC is attacked from the net on a pretty regular basis and I want to
> spend a minimum of time and effort coping with that.

Understandable and not always possible. Is your computer connected to
a NAT router?

> I do have an old version of Norton Symantec Corporate anti virus
> (Just hate the installation problems with those products) and

Perhaps best known as SAV for Symantec Anti Virus (No Norton!) What is
its exact version?

> WinPatrol (Scotty) that
> will tell you that you are being infected but is unable to stop anything.
> Ad-Aware. All free versions except Scotty.

Should we be led to believe that you have no antivirus protection at
the moment?

What version OS are you running now? Please include the service pack
level.

--
1PW

Message has been deleted
0 new messages