No evidence exists that it is not "real".
It's too early to judge the effectiveness of the new engine features.
It would be best to employ a blend of separate protective solutions
till more facts surface. Eventually you will either need to upgrade
or abandon anyway.
While adequately protected with other spyware solutions, why not
seriously field test with us and post your impressions in a few months?
Your serious thoughts, with those of others, would be quite welcome.
--
1PW
If at some point you are unable to tolerate Ad-Aware, many of us have
moved on to the superior MBAM & SAS.
If you haven't already discovered them, you could give their freeware
versions a try:
MBAM: <http://www.malwarebytes.org/>
SAS: <http://www.superantispyware.com/>
--
1PW
The AVG web site says their free version is compatible with Windows 7.
--
1PW
Respectfully no. I would use Avira's AntiVir Personal with Windows 7.
However, you must be cognizant of /all/ your antimalware needs along
with your system's total security protection requirements.
--
1PW
As a /generality/ that's very true indeed.
> My PC is attacked from the net on a pretty regular basis and I want to
> spend a minimum of time and effort coping with that.
Understandable and not always possible. Is your computer connected to
a NAT router?
> I do have an old version of Norton Symantec Corporate anti virus
> (Just hate the installation problems with those products) and
Perhaps best known as SAV for Symantec Anti Virus (No Norton!) What is
its exact version?
> WinPatrol (Scotty) that
> will tell you that you are being infected but is unable to stop anything.
> Ad-Aware. All free versions except Scotty.
Should we be led to believe that you have no antivirus protection at
the moment?
What version OS are you running now? Please include the service pack
level.
--
1PW