Interesting information bluecollarpc.net's toolbar
Dustin Cook
After closely examining the toolbar offered by bluecollarpc.net, I'm left
with no choice but to include it for detection and optional removal by the
user due to the fact it's using a known adware/trackware companies product
that's simply rebranded.
As of today, 07-13-2007, BugHunter detects this program and both known
variants of it, one which affects firefox via an extensions installation
and the other which affects Internet Explorer via a BHO installation.
Based on information collected on the company actually responsible for most
of the code present inside, I'd recommend others follow suit.
Thank You.
--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunte...@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
Dustin Cook
news:1184539808....@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
> I am sure McAfee Site Advisor would like to hear your false report to
> correct theirs then... (WHY HAVE YOU MADE THIS FALSE REPORT ???):::>
>
> SEE:
> http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/conduit.com?domain=conduit.com&ref=saf
> esearch&aff_id=0
>
> conduit.com
> Green Verdict Image
>
> We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems.
> Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
>
> Automated Web Safety Testing Results for conduit.com
> e-mail tests for conduit.com:
> We found 2 sign-up forms and testing is in progress.
> Download tests for conduit.com:
> Downloads we found on this site:
> Download Analysis
> micro2media Toolbar (micro2media.exe)
> micro2media Toolbar (micro2media.exe)
> micro2media Toolbar (micro2media.exe)
>
> 3 green downloads
> In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
> spyware, and other unwanted programs.
>
> * View detailed analysis
> * Submit a download for analysis
>
> Online affiliations for conduit.com:
> Link Graph
>
> Linked to green sites
>
> When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
> sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
> Annoyances from conduit.com:
> Reviewer and Web site owner comments
> User Review Summary for conduit.com
>
> This site is good (9)
> This site spams (0)
>
> Adware, spyware, or viruses (1)
> Excessive popups (0)
> Phishing or other scams (1)
> Bad shopping experience (1)
> Browser exploit (0)
>
> IN REPLY TO==============>
> bluecollarpc.net's toolbar
>
> The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
> this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the
> Internet.
> Your reply message has not been sent.
> Your post was successful
>
>
> Dustin Cook View profile
> More options Jul 13, 8:14 pm
>
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware, alt.comp.virus
> From: Dustin Cook <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:14:58 GMT
> Local: Fri, Jul 13 2007 8:14 pm
> Subject: Interesting information bluecollarpc.net's toolbar
> Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show
> original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
> Hi All,
>
> After closely examining the toolbar offered by bluecollarpc.net, I'm
> left
> with no choice but to include it for detection and optional removal by
> the
> user due to the fact it's using a known adware/trackware companies
> product
> that's simply rebranded.
>
>
> As of today, 07-13-2007, BugHunter detects this program and both
> known
> variants of it, one which affects firefox via an extensions
> installation
> and the other which affects Internet Explorer via a BHO installation.
>
>
> Based on information collected on the company actually responsible for
> most
> of the code present inside, I'd recommend others follow suit.
>
>
> Thank You.
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
> email: bughunter.dus...@gmail.com.removethis
> web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
>
> THAT IS THE END OF YOUR NAME LIAR....OBVIOUSLY A PERSONAL ATTACK AS IT
> IS NOT "BLUECOLLAR'S TOOLBAR.... IT BELONGS TO CONDUIT.COM PUNK ASS
> LIAR .... THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR TELLING THIS NEWS ROOM YOUR
> CREDIBILITY JUST DIED FOREVER IN SECURITY WORLD .... CLAP CLAP....
> THANK YOU SIR !!!!
Your an idiot, sir. The toolbar is as I said, rebranded. Your site offers
it, it's actually created by a company with questionable (at the least)
business practices. BugHunter detects it, gives credit where credit is
due; your site is all over the damn thing, and offers to remove it if the
user would like.
I have made no personal attacks on you or your site. I've simply given it
a name based on what the persons responsible for it's release (that would
be you) wanted it to be known as.
As far as my credit is concerned sir, You as you have yourself said are
merely a user. I am the expert, by your own definition and the
terminology you follow; Your the little man on the totem poll. I've been
writing code far longer than you've even been playing with computers, and
really, that's all you've been doing. Don't even bother trying to come
off as anything more than a fuckwit. BugHunter is a free program, I have
no commercial interests invested in it. That means, in plain english, I
can give an honest opinion and say what I want without worrying about my
stocks.
If the company who actually wrote the code you pass off as your own stuff
for your lame website has an issue, they know how to reach me. However,
they likely won't bother. Various companies like them know how it goes in
this game. That toolbar is junk, and your really an asshole for
suggesting people download it.
Sure, I bet they do get new users every 2 seconds. Doesn't adware have a
high infection rate?
Dustin Cook
news:1184540805.9...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com:
> And this is your idea of reciprocity ? Which shows I am intelligent
> and you are not ? Poor baby (yah yah yah yah yahyah gahgah) did some
Radio Plug-In removed
15/07/2007
The radio plug-in has been removed from our toolbar to avoid contact with
unknown websites (channels) and possible infection. SEE:
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=403
Is that the only reason you've removed it, or are you trying to evade
BugHunter detection routines? :)
I previously said you were an asshole for suggesting people to get the
toolbar, and you admit it's now a security risk with atleast one of it's
plug-ins. I rightfully detect that junk, and the next signature update
will continue to protect users from your ignorance. I wonder what you'll
suggest people do next, for "security". Sheesh.
> HEY GET FUCKED JERK OFF ....SAID THAT....THIS JUST WENT TO CONDUIT.COM
> WHOM I AM SURE WILL BE KNOKING ON YOUR DOOR IMMEDIATELY FAGGER
Bring it on. :)
Anonymous
"cbgerry" <cbg...@bluecollarpc.net> scritte:
> One point here is that you do not name the infection ? 2-Spyware.com
> is "rebranded" and off of the offender's lists. What was your point -
> that like 2-Spyware.com is once bad always bad ??? Meaning apply to
> the toolbar former owner and new owner. You see you are not giving up
> any results whatsoever which is neccessary for any sane person to
> believe anything you are talking about.
>
> Nothing personal but -- ""Dustin Cook Author of BugHunter - MalWare
> Removal Tool "" is just not the "Security Savior" of the world web
> whereas Kapersky, Norton, and Webroot are. This is the problem... it
> is tooooo hard to believe that you personally have the only
> antimalware utility in the world that detects malware with the
> "bluecollarpc toolbar" and the others do not. Any Comments ???
My only comment, Gerry, is that you and Dustin are cocksuckers!
Fuck off and die!
Both of you!
Dustin Cook
news:1184589318....@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com:
> You are full of it sir and this is a personal attack. There are over a
> million Conduit.com toolbars and mine is one of them. They are all the
Indeed conduit has a large amount of rebranded toolbars around. Yours is
one of them, several others I believe are also known to BugHunter. They
are added based on when I recieve viable samples. In your case, since you
advertise it, I visited your site and downloaded it, Installed it via
firefox and IE using sandboxie, so I could see exactly what changes it
makes.
> exact same thing including mine - so why did you pick mine out as the
> only one infected ??? It doesn't make sense. Again McAfee has stated
Please see above. I really don't pick and choose. The targets are
selected based on samples I recieve and what they do.
> there is absolutely no infection in "bluecollarpc" community toolbar.
BugHunter doesn't look for infections, as viruses cause those.
Spyware/adware/keyloggers are really all trojans, and BugHunter does
detect some of them. The toolbar itself is classified by me as
Adware/trackware. It poses a security risk for the following reasons.
1. It transfers "anonymous" usage data back to conduit.com; this data
stream is actually encrypted, so who knows what it really sends to them.
2. The radio option as you noticed is a security risk, you don't have
control over the sites it's tied too.
3. The other plugins don't always communicate strickly with your server
either.
4. The company which actually produces the code inside the toolbar still
employs questionable business practices.
5. Officially, because the toolbar actually installs itself as an
extension, and not as a plugin, is against the mozilla foundation rules.
Your toolbar generates income for conduit based on what users search for.
If they click a result, conduit gets paid. They are leeching off of
firefox users. What you click is apparently "anonymously" tracked back to
conduit. Anonymous only serving to mean that it can't be tied to the
specific computer your using... Atleast, I don't know of any exploits yet
which would allow that with this program.
> Now when I get personally attacked that was how I responded - earlier
> deleted message.
I didn't personally attack you, aside from calling you an idiot. :)
> So my civil question is why did you pick my toolbar out that is
> exactly the same exact for user name as one million plus of the same
> exact toolbar from the same exact creator and server - Conduit.com ?
Reasons for including it provided above. You were not singled out, Your
toolbar was easy to get access too, and I did as any normal user would do
who's curious. I downloaded it and analyzed it. When I noticed it's
actually conduits work, rebranded, red flags went up.
> In other words Conduit.com offers these free toolbars to anyone and
> there have been over a million created. Each user that creates one can
That's right. Over a million variants of the software, passed along to
unsuspecting users who simply don't know any better.
> pick out of there services any of a large handful of features to add
> to it. There is absolutely nothing the user can add personally into
> the toolbar such as malware in what ever - script code language
> whatever. So if every one of these toolbars are exactly the same thing
Not true, sir. Your extension installation for firefox can be
edited/altered easily. In fact, it's javascript when installed for
firefox, and an actual DLL when used in IE. The supporting plugins are,
java scripts with xml configuration files. Very easy to expand upon.
> except for user name and what they chose to be their features add-ins
> - then what are you saying ? You are only getting malware positives on
See above.
> Your charges against me would be the same thing as a worm affecting
> the Yahoo Groups Service - and then blame me for it as the Group Owner
> of BlueCollarPC.Net News Group. This is absurd. Same thing, there are
I haven't made any charges against you, directly. I don't recommend
people make use of your toolbar, for the reasons I stated above. That
doesn't mean I don't recommend you, as I am neutral (or try to be) as far
as your informational providing is concerned. I disagree with the
majority of your posts, but alas, that's my right to do so, and your
right to post the material I think is nonsense.
> thousands upon thousands of Yahoo Groups - free - created by thousands
> and thousands of individuals. Again ther, there is nothing the user
> can put into the Yahoo Groups except choice of features provided by
> Yahoo.
Agreed, with yahoo groups. Your toolbar however isn't yahoo groups, and
certainly can be altered once installed.
> Do you understand my points ? Would that help as an aplogy for the
> rage reply ? Or do you hold onto I am guilty of some malware
You don't owe me any apology. You weren't very professional in your
previous correspondence with me, but I understand why. I really didn't
target you, I targetted software that I don't think you should be
inviting users to download. BugHunter doesn't automatically remove it,
unless the users tells it to do so, so in the end, the user still has the
final say in whether or not it lives or dies.
> insertion ? I can accept your answer either way... I mean it would
> seem you obviously tested the download I am guessing. Of course I
No guessing required. I'm a programmer, testing/analyzing/writing code is
something I do. :) I even surf myspace on purpose looking for new
samples. *grin*
> your findings then and I would immedaitely remove the bluecollarpc
> free toolbar from the Internet and tell all users the same -
> immedaitely uninstall it.
Your site is about security, and I understand your desire to help users.
You can start by removing the toolbar, and suggesting users uninstall it.
No security site in it's right mind would be asking users to download and
install any sort of toolbar.
I'm not asking you to accept/admit any fault. As a precautionary measure,
if nothing else, I'm asking you to remove the toolbar and suggest your
userbase do the same. I have filled out an account on your forums,
Hopefully you will allow it to go thru, and we can discuss this further
if you'd like. You can also email me at the email address I left on your
site. I know you hate google, and apparently yahoo, but those are what I
use for email corresponce and I have for a very very long time. Please
excuse the addresses in my case, if you don't mind. :)
> You see you have opened a great can of worms here - and as far as some
> real unresolved issues - that can involve having my websites shut down
> as malicious content websites in Violations Of Terms Of Service.
I have no intention of trying to have your website shutdown. Your not
actually hosting the toolbar yourself, so you don't have to worry about
that anyway.
> Let me say that I am a simple consumer. I qualify myself as an
> Advanced User (Windows). I am completely non-commercial. The best I
> can offer your comments is that I downloaded the toolbar after I chose
> its name and features and it was ready at Conduit.com for download. At
I would agree with your assessment. I strongly disagree with some of your
editorials and I'll be happy to debate them on you forum openly, with
your permission of course. I figured you checked out the toolbar, saw
it's potential to increase traffic and started recommending it. Somehow,
you noticed the radio plugin has issues and have since disabled that, as
a precautionary measure, if nothing else, while admitting no fault
whatsoever, please remove the toolbar. If you already found one plugin
with potential risk, why place your users at continued risk?
> the time I was running Trend Micro Antispyware and Webroot Spysweeper.
> There were absolutely no indications of malware with the toolbar
> installed and running on both Internet Explorer and then I installed
> the Firefox version. No indications of malware. I did scans and as
As you should know, and if not, you do now, no program regardless of it's
free/commercial status catches everything. Malware is released at an
alarming rate by farms which basically xmit the same thing, slightly
modified. :(
> well there are absolutely no indications of infection as far as
> antivirus softwares. So as far as Webroot, Trend Micro, Clam, AVG are
> concerned oh, and McAfee Site Advisor, there is no such thing as any
> malware infection in the bluecollarpc free toolbar.
The toolbar itself allows for 3rd party things to be installed,
potentially without user consent. The toolbar can easily be modified by a
user or another party, and this too is a security risk issue.
> For the statements you made and how they would appear qualified - I am
> the LAST person you would notifiy about your opinion of any malware
> infection in my toolbar - my, because I am the user-owner of it by
> user account. Your reports would be assumed to have been made with all
Actually, I always try to contact the author of a program I'm checking
out, to see if my findings match theres or if they can explain why it
does this or that. I did this in your case by creating an account the
other day. You deleted it?
> the big names - many were here. Have you made any infection reports ?
> What were the results ? You mean you haven't put your money where your
Those big names you like to toss around are automated scanning sites, I
use them myself. A human doesn't at the time of your submittal examine
it. Eventually, some av researchers will get there hands on the sample,
but until then, it's all good according to the automated systems.
You should *not* ever assume that if you get no hits for malware by
submitting them that the file really is safe.
> mouth and made infection reports ? I am sorrry but I have never heard
> of you as far as any independent Testing Lab - are you one ? Why would
I'm not a lab. :) I'm a reformed virus writer. I used to write the "bad
stuff". heh.
> you be contacting me ? Have you contacted any other "user creators" of
> Conduit.com Community Toolbars ? Why Not ?
I have tried to contact you, in email and by creating an account on your
forum. I have contacted authors of various other things which I detect.
I've even contacted PcButts over his pirated scripts.
> I mean if you have any grit - yopu certainly understand all the
> implications here and this is just the tip of the iceberg need I say
No implications that I can see. Your concerned for your site, and you
have no reason to be alarmed. Nobody is trying to take you to court or
have you shutdown. I'm simply trying to make you understand, hopefully,
that this toolbar is a bad idea. Your a security site, don't provide
risks to your users.
> more ? You are quite welcome to HELP out by joining any of our Groups
> or Forums or all to discuss this in full to achieve some remedy. This
I have created another account today, the name of which is Raid. I'd be
happy to post on your groups and explain the situation if this hasn't for
you. I have no personal issues with you yourself, I do however, disagree
with several of your posts on your forum and I'd like to discuss those as
well. Security is an important task, and I'm glad your interested in
helping people, it's good of you. It would be even better if the
information you provided was more accurate, and I would be glad to help
you in this respect.
> may be one of them and your discovery can simply NOT go unnoticed
> obviously. I would respect everything you say in this manner at my
> groups is a promise. Here (news group) we know anything flaky is
> immediately deemed as a Troll and slammed ummercifully. That was my
> original response - and let's hope not deservedly so.
A troll I'm not, as you will learn.
> I am trying to think right off hand of the virus board (very famous)
> where reports are received.... ahhh VirusTotal.com and of course all
> quality spyware softwares have website forms to report infection. I am
> wandering why you brought this to me first and not them. THAT is very,
> very "unprofessional" and because of that demanded the response I
I have tried to bring my findings to your attention privately. I was
actually hoping we could get this removed and not really make a big deal
out of it. Everybody learns, you know? Conduit has been contacted
numerous times by various companies over this toolbar of theres.
> made. 'Nuff said ? If you are genuinely interested in the pc and
> online security of all of the community of computer users as I am -
> then I expect to hear some immediate results from on our behalf....
> 'till then
Indeed I am. BugHunter is my little way of giving back for some of the
harm I caused.
> You know where I live on the Net. Be there ! My apologies, I regret
> earlier communications as very childish perhaps. See you soon I will
> help with your reports.
I'm looking forward to a decent dialogue with you, sir.
Dustin Cook
news:1184721112.2...@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com:
> On Jul 13, 8:14 pm, Dustin Cook
> <spamfilterineffect.see....@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After closely examining the toolbar offered by bluecollarpc.net, I'm
>> left with no choice but to include it for detection and optional
>> removal by the user due to the fact it's using a known
>> adware/trackware companies product that's simply rebranded.
>>
>> As of today, 07-13-2007, BugHunter detects this program and both
>> known variants of it, one which affects firefox via an extensions
>> installation and the other which affects Internet Explorer via a BHO
>> installation.
>>
>> Based on information collected on the company actually responsible
>> for most of the code present inside, I'd recommend others follow
>> suit.
>>
>> Thank You.
>>
>> --
>> Dustin Cook
>> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
>> email: bughunter.dus...@gmail.com.removethis
>> web..:http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
>> Pad..:http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
>
> Unintersting Dustin Cook BugHunter Red Warnings - Site Advisor
You didn't find any warnings concerning the BugHunter program, only some
sites which mirror it. Obviously I'm not in control of the content those
sites choose to publish, so I find it very amusing that you would even
try to mislead people into thinking you found something wrong with
BugHunter. many sites mirror it, and I have no control over that. That's
software popularity for you.
> GOODBY MR COOK AND BUGHUNTER .....
*Yawn, As you seem to be blocking me? now with your email server, I'll
simply paste my response to your half-assed threat you emailed me
earlier.
Date sent: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:30:22 -0400
From: "Dustin Cook"
<bughunte...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding the bluecollarpc.net toolbar
To: "PostmasterBCPCNET"
<postm...@bluecollarpc.net>
BCC to: dLi...@Verizon.Net
Send reply to: bughunte...@gmail.com
Priority: normal
> On 17 Jul 2007 at 12:05, PostmasterBCPCNET wrote:
>
> > YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH UNSOLICITED EMAIL..... APPEAL BY REPLY TO
> > THIS MESSAGE ONLY FROM THE SAME OFFENDING ADDRESS
>
> Consider this an appeal then.
>
> > This address is for all communications with related issues of the
> > www.BlueCollarPC.Net Domain and associated Forums. It is not a
contact
> > address for personal communications. I am sure you are aware of that.
>
> What an odd form letter you provide. I requested contact with the
owner,
> that was all. If the owner doesn't wish to discuss the matter, I will
> leave things as they presently are. Your humourous threats, aside.
>
> > This address also doubles as List Owner contact for any related mail
> > issues for the www.BlueCollarPC.Net and associated Forums. It is our
> > Domain Postmater Mail Service Address. I am sure you are aware of
> > that.
>
> Actually, I was under the mistaken impression that the postmaster might
> forward me to the appropriate person.
>
> > Since we are known contacts from the newsroom I have suspended the
> > whole "this is the most deplorable of acts by blah blah blah as far
as
> > this being Unsolicted Email. However, aside from being appauled by
> > your flagrant dismisal of all General Internet Guidelines - this is
> > your FIRST WARNING - UNSOLICITED EMAIL....
>
> all General internet guidelines? I'm sorry, I'm confused. Would you
> please show me the guidelines you accuse me of breaking?
>
> What is this newsroom? I've yet to make a post on your forums, You
don't
> apparently approve my account? Who knows... My efforts at contacting
you
> regarding the toolbar are obviously being ignored.
>
> > My suggestions are to visit our website and join any appropriate
> > groups, list, or forum posted there with plain membnership
information
> > for your communications needs which are security related. This was
> > perhaps a grace undeserved since your entire communiocations seem
> > based on personal attack and now stalking the Postmaster.
>
> Your first language isn't english eh? I already told you, I cannot seem
> to contact you via your forum; You have a silly "I have to validate the
> account before you can post" and you don't validate, so I can't post;
> obviously. However, instead of letting me know I am not welcome there,
> you invite me, and then send me this nonsense. Laughable, very
> laughable.
>
> You clearly have no idea what a personal attack is, sir.
>
> > Any of the addresses present as Group Owner, List Owner, Forum
> > Administator, Webmaster and so on are NOT for personal communications
> > but you know that. They are necessary for the functions of these
>
> but you know that is not a good use of english for a form letter, fyi.
> Webmaster fine, that's who I need to speak with, although I suspect
your
> all one in the same person. Would you forward my initial email to him,
> please? That was I believe, the only email i've sent you before this
> one. And I'm certainly not soliciting anything from you, Look up the
> definition to the word before you use it again so foolishly.
>
> > events and review major domo rules of engagement for them as a prime
> > example. In short, this was a very inappropriate communication and I
> > was surprised - and to stop any arguement without engaging one - this
> > address as a List Owner or Forum Owner contact address is ONLY for
> > List or Forum inquiries by Members and Vistors for and about the
> > respective Lists and Forums. I see NOTHING in the body message as
> > these common valid inqueries but rather admitted personal requests
and
> > as such completely constitutes this as Unsolicted Email and as such
is
> > in Violation of Terms of Service by Google and your ISP and the
> > BlueCollarPC.Net Domain Mail Service.
>
> I don't know why you seem to think Google, or my ISP sent you the
email.
> I sent it to you, via my own mail server. You can't read email headers
> eh? You are certainly no security expert.
>
> And I certainly didn't violate my terms of service agreements by doing
> so. Your so full of horse shit, it's not even funny.
>
> > Cease and desist immediately or report will be made promptly. You
have
> > been properly warned against inappropriate communications to the
> > BlueCollarPC.Net Domain Postmaster.
>
> You know what sir? Your welcome to file your report. In fact, you can
> send a copy to ab...@raidsmailserver.com if you'd like.
>
> Since discussion with you isn't possible, the issue with the toolbar
has
> been dismissed. Detection routines will continue to detect the program
> as potentially malicious in nature.
>
> This is the last email you will receive from me on this matter. Should
> you wish to appeal the decision in the future, your welcome to email me
> at the address provided in my headers.
>
> > YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH UNSOLICITED EMAIL..... APPEAL BY REPLY TO
> > THIS MESSAGE ONLY FROM THE SAME OFFENDING ADDRESS
> >
> > POSTMASTER BLUECOLLARPC.NET DOMAIN
> >
> > Return-Path: <bughunte...@gmail.com>
> > Delivered-To: postm...@bluecollarpc.net
> > Received: (qmail 16084 invoked by uid 399); 17 Jul 2007 01:46:13 -
0000
> > X-Virus-Scan: Scanned by ClamAV 0.90.3 (no viruses);
> > Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:46:13 -0500
> > Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (209.85.132.242)
> > by mail5.ourmailservers.net with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2007 01:46:13 -0000
> > X-Originating-IP: 209.85.132.242 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com
> > with SMTP id d40so277317and
> > for <postm...@bluecollarpc.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:53:27
> > -0700
> > (PDT)
> > DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> > d=gmail.com; s=beta;
> > h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:date:mime-
vers
> > ion:subject:reply-to:message-id:priority:x-mailer:content-
type
> > :content-transfer-encoding:content-description;
> >
b=P1/9p62ZU5Dc9N4UZjAZAHfYGG+KmW6P6RuGqNqbiIEGt+hVVTFB9UPAcTcL
> >
mh4uT20rQP/Soyzd4CDt+tnIRq9sqHN5MC2VhjMYc6maqSARqPmqZ8H+xRNtZY
> > hazFZ7TafJsP2Rn87Lfc3w6vUzofuv61MEKdNwue+FKJtJQP0=
> > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
> > d=gmail.com; s=beta;
> > h=received:from:to:date:mime-version:subject:reply-
to:message-
> > id:priority:x-mailer:content-type:content-transfer-
encoding:co
> > ntent-description;
> > b=WvttS+u+O2L/lWj9
+SNXK9bKQ20YFq7iXVkcvG5BjOjkwktWujdasR7aSo4m
> >
KAUB/y2BpQewZWcllcPPHVwYSyEac9OD2jbQ6XlZgnsdUk1HhlrDjAWulVMOdx
> > nEPMYJrSED9kR1HjDBXUw4rweAZ6HQPsBlKJzCQYShw1qEg1Q=
> > Received: by 10.100.177.16 with SMTP id
z16mr2651399ane.1184637207487;
> > Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
> > Return-Path: <bughunte...@gmail.com>
> > Received: from ?192.168.1.100? ( [24.158.104.24])
> > by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
> > c14sm13345449ana.2007.07.16.18.53.23 (version=SSLv3
> > cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: "Dustin" <bughunte...@gmail.com>
> > To: postm...@bluecollarpc.net
> > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:57:01 -0400
> > Subject: Regarding the bluecollarpc.net toolbar
> > Reply-to: bughunte...@gmail.com
> > Message-ID: <469BE9AD.52...@bughunter.dustin.gmail.com>
> > Priority: normal
> > X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41)
> > Content-description: Mail message body
> > X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 7.5.476 [269.10.8/904]
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dustin" <bughunte...@gmail.com>
> > To: <postm...@bluecollarpc.net>
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:57 PM
> > Subject: Regarding the bluecollarpc.net toolbar
> >
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'd like to be put in contact with Gerry if at all possible. Could
> > someone please forward this email to him for me? It concerns the
> > toolbar, my reasoning behind including it in bughunter, etc.
> >
> > Thank You.
> >
> > --
> > Dustin Cook
> > Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool
> > http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/904 - Release Date:
> > 7/16/2007 5:42 PM
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Just who is it your trying to bullshit exactly anyways Gerry?
> WEBMASTER BLUECOLLARPC.NET SAID DHAT/.
Yesterday I was invited to your forum, to discuss the issue. Today you
send me a laughable threat that I pasted above. Obviously your worried
about BugHunter targetting your toolbar. So your trying in vein to
somehow discredit it or myself. Again, don't bother, your nothing more
than an end user; and you've already admitted to such. In plain simple
english, you sir are a total and complete utter fucking moron.
Dustin Cook, Said that!
George Orwell
Stay tuned for the next exciting episode of "The Gerry and Dustbin Show".
Kadaitcha Man
professed tyrant. Thou rank gnat. Ye stewed:
> Y<BITCHSLAP>
Fuck me dead. Are you still alive, you mental cunt?
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E
Wat ben jij een omhooggevallen endomorfe baarmoederslijmvlieg.