Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What happened?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 29, 2012, 3:08:51 PM1/29/12
to
Where did everyone go?
~BD~
Jan 29, 2012, 3:15:34 PM1/29/12
to
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> Where did everyone go?
Ask Graham on Twitter!
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."
> Where did everyone go?
Ask Graham on Twitter!
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."
David H. Lipman
Jan 29, 2012, 4:35:15 PM1/29/12
to
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
| Where did everyone go?
Never left Rhonda.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
| Where did everyone go?
Never left Rhonda.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
Buffalo
Jan 29, 2012, 6:25:59 PM1/29/12
to
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> Where did everyone go?
Buffalo
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 29, 2012, 7:22:31 PM1/29/12
to
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:OOednf6j9q4JJrjS...@giganews.com...
> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>
> | Where did everyone go?
> Never left Rhonda.
It's just really weird that there hasn't been a post since the 25th, so I
>
> | Where did everyone go?
> Never left Rhonda.
thought I'd send a test message (of sorts).
Is BD still infesting the group?
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 29, 2012, 7:23:10 PM1/29/12
to
"Buffalo" <Er...@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:jg4khi$4dc$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> Where did everyone go?
> I'm still hiding behind the frig.
Closet is better. More room, and the temperature stays even.
>
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> Where did everyone go?
> I'm still hiding behind the frig.
David H. Lipman
Jan 29, 2012, 7:58:50 PM1/29/12
to
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
|
| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
| news:OOednf6j9q4JJrjS...@giganews.com...
>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>>
|>> Where did everyone go?
>> Never left Rhonda.
|
| It's just really weird that there hasn't been a post since the 25th, so I
| thought I'd send a test message (of sorts).
|
| Is BD still infesting the group?
|
Yes { sigh }
|
| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
| news:OOednf6j9q4JJrjS...@giganews.com...
>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>>
|>> Where did everyone go?
>> Never left Rhonda.
|
| It's just really weird that there hasn't been a post since the 25th, so I
| thought I'd send a test message (of sorts).
|
| Is BD still infesting the group?
|
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 5:27:36 AM1/30/12
to
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>
> |
> | "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
> | news:OOednf6j9q4JJrjS...@giganews.com...
>>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>>>
> |>> Where did everyone go?
>>> Never left Rhonda.
> |
> | It's just really weird that there hasn't been a post since the 25th, so I
> | thought I'd send a test message (of sorts).
> |
> | Is BD still infesting the group?
> |
>
> Yes { sigh }
>
You have a problem with my presence here?
> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>
> |
> | "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
> | news:OOednf6j9q4JJrjS...@giganews.com...
>>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>>>
> |>> Where did everyone go?
>>> Never left Rhonda.
> |
> | It's just really weird that there hasn't been a post since the 25th, so I
> | thought I'd send a test message (of sorts).
> |
> | Is BD still infesting the group?
> |
>
> Yes { sigh }
>
If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 5:30:02 AM1/30/12
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:sq-dnQMctqbYDLjS...@bt.com...
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DS...@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.
OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."
bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on
I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 5:30:55 AM1/30/12
to
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 10:01:12 AM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> Where did everyone go?
>
>Ask Graham on Twitter!
WTF is that supposed to mean?
>Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> Where did everyone go?
>
>Ask Graham on Twitter!
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 10:02:38 AM1/30/12
to
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>Where did everyone go?
The players are still here for questions, but as you can see the group
>Where did everyone go?
has been overrun with nonsense lately.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 11:04:44 AM1/30/12
to
Mostly from the likes of you and your boss bd.
Put down the drugs and seek treatment.
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:46cdi7plq3jt0f1sv...@Osama-is-dead.net...
Put down the drugs and seek treatment.
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:46cdi7plq3jt0f1sv...@Osama-is-dead.net...
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 11:10:09 AM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 11:29:17 AM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 11:53:45 AM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 12:08:43 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 7:01:33 PM1/30/12
to
You should realise by now that I *am* good at whatever I choose to do! ;-)
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 7:09:12 PM1/30/12
to
G. Morgan wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:37 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> [newsgroup changed, this is not about malware]
>>>
>>> I told you in private and public not to email me, yet you keep doing so.
>>
>> Again?????
>>
>> I'm correct when I say he's far too sto0pid to follow even the simplest
>> of instructions.
>
> This time is was a screen shot of Rhonda following me on Twitter.
>
Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
She's been really nasty to me.
Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
I'd really like to know.
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:37 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> [newsgroup changed, this is not about malware]
>>>
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>>>>
>>>>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> YGM!
>>>
>>> <STALK>
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>>>>
>>>>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> YGM!
>>>
>>>
>>> I told you in private and public not to email me, yet you keep doing so.
>>
>> Again?????
>>
>> I'm correct when I say he's far too sto0pid to follow even the simplest
>> of instructions.
>
> This time is was a screen shot of Rhonda following me on Twitter.
>
Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
She's been really nasty to me.
Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
I'd really like to know.
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:15:05 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>
>She's been really nasty to me.
>
>Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>
>I'd really like to know.
I bet you would.
>Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>
>She's been really nasty to me.
>
>Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>
>I'd really like to know.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 7:17:12 PM1/30/12
to
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:18:21 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>
>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>
>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>
>
>Do you really want me to post the reason here, Graham?
>
>You should realise by now that I *am* good at whatever I choose to do! ;-)
I don't what the fuck you're talking about, but it sounds like a threat
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>
>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>
>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>
>
>Do you really want me to post the reason here, Graham?
>
>You should realise by now that I *am* good at whatever I choose to do! ;-)
of some sort.
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 7:19:42 PM1/30/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:09:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:37 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>>
>>>> [newsgroup changed, this is not about malware]
>>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> YGM!
>>>>
>>>> <STALK>
>>>>
>>>> I told you in private and public not to email me, yet you keep doing
>>>> so.
>>>
>>> Again?????
>>>
>>> I'm correct when I say he's far too sto0pid to follow even the
>>> simplest of instructions.
>>
>> This time is was a screen shot of Rhonda following me on Twitter.
>>
>>
> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>
It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:37 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>>
>>>> [newsgroup changed, this is not about malware]
>>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> YGM!
>>>>
>>>> <STALK>
>>>>
>>>> I told you in private and public not to email me, yet you keep doing
>>>> so.
>>>
>>> Again?????
>>>
>>> I'm correct when I say he's far too sto0pid to follow even the
>>> simplest of instructions.
>>
>> This time is was a screen shot of Rhonda following me on Twitter.
>>
>>
> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>
tempted to email you or let you email them.
> She's been really nasty to me.
>
> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>
> I'd really like to know.
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:21:15 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>
>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>
>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>
>>> I'd really like to know.
>>
>> I bet you would.
>>
>
>The truth *will* out, young man! :-)
It sounds like it is out, she follows me on Twitter; so fucking what?
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>
>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>
>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>
>>> I'd really like to know.
>>
>> I bet you would.
>>
>
>The truth *will* out, young man! :-)
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 7:22:22 PM1/30/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>
>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>
>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>
>>> I'd really like to know.
>>
>> I bet you would.
>>
>>
> The truth *will* out, young man!
So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>
>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>
>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>
>>> I'd really like to know.
>>
>> I bet you would.
>>
>>
> The truth *will* out, young man!
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:24:47 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>
>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>
>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>
>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>
>>> I bet you would.
>>>
>>>
>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>
>So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
Oh boy...
>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>
>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>
>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>
>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>
>>> I bet you would.
>>>
>>>
>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>
>So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 7:30:14 PM1/30/12
to
Fucking creepy, mate.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 7:31:34 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>
>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>
>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>
>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>
>>> I bet you would.
>>>
>>>
>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>
> So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>
WTF???? Are you smoking that weed again?
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>
>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>
>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>
>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>
>>> I bet you would.
>>>
>>>
>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>
> So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>
That's *illegal*.
Those pot police are not far from your door!
Any time now.
But you know the risk you run, don't you?
Dope! (ha!)
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:34:20 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
>It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>tempted to email you or let you email them.
I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
>It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>tempted to email you or let you email them.
you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP. He's gone from
spamming me to what now sounds like extortion.
Please retain any forwards I send your way, if you don't mind. I may
need them to match my own copies if we end up in court.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 7:35:25 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
> But is he stalking you, Rhonda or both of you?
>
> Fucking creepy, mate.
Yep!
> But is he stalking you, Rhonda or both of you?
>
> Fucking creepy, mate.
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:39:56 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:24:47 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet you would.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>>>
>>>So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>
>> Oh boy...
>
>But is he stalking you, Rhonda or both of you?
Me, I guess.
>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:24:47 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet you would.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>>>
>>>So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>
>> Oh boy...
>
>But is he stalking you, Rhonda or both of you?
>Fucking creepy, mate.
Understatement! I really don't know why he thinks its unusual for two
long-term Usenetter's to look @ each others Tweets.
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 7:40:12 PM1/30/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:31:34 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>>
>>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>>
>>>> I bet you would.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>>
>> So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>
>>
> <SNIP IRELEVANCE>
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>>
>>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>>
>>>> I bet you would.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>>
>> So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>
>>
So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 7:41:30 PM1/30/12
to
Strong stuff you're smoking, Graham? <shakes head>
Talk to me face-to-face when your head clears. OK?
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:42:18 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>> So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>
>
>WTF???? Are you smoking that weed again?
So what if he is?
>> So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>
>
>WTF???? Are you smoking that weed again?
>That's *illegal*.
Unjust laws are made to be broken.
>Those pot police are not far from your door!
>Any time now.
>
>But you know the risk you run, don't you?
>Dope! (ha!)
Nice sig.
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 7:43:04 PM1/30/12
to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:34:20 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>>tempted to email you or let you email them.
>
> I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
> you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP.
Fucking good idea, mate.
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>>tempted to email you or let you email them.
>
> I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
> you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP.
> He's gone from
> spamming me to what now sounds like extortion.
>
The guy's a real scum bag.
> Please retain any forwards I send your way, if you don't mind. I may
> need them to match my own copies if we end up in court.
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 7:59:53 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>>> tempted to email you or let you email them.
>>
>> I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
>> you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP. He's gone from
>> spamming me to what now sounds like extortion.
>>
>> Please retain any forwards I send your way, if you don't mind. I may
>> need them to match my own copies if we end up in court.
>
>Wow!
>
>Strong stuff you're smoking, Graham? <shakes head>
Fuck you.
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>>> tempted to email you or let you email them.
>>
>> I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
>> you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP. He's gone from
>> spamming me to what now sounds like extortion.
>>
>> Please retain any forwards I send your way, if you don't mind. I may
>> need them to match my own copies if we end up in court.
>
>Wow!
>
>Strong stuff you're smoking, Graham? <shakes head>
>Talk to me face-to-face when your head clears. OK?
Otherwise its harassment. Is BT telecom open for 24/hr helpdesk support?
Ask them, don't take my word.
If you continue to send me email, they will be in touch with you.
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 8:03:35 PM1/30/12
to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:59:53 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>G. Morgan wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>>>> tempted to email you or let you email them.
>>>
>>> I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
>>> you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP. He's gone from
>>> spamming me to what now sounds like extortion.
>>>
>>> Please retain any forwards I send your way, if you don't mind. I may
>>> need them to match my own copies if we end up in court.
>>
>>Wow!
>>
>>Strong stuff you're smoking, Graham? <shakes head>
>
> Fuck you.
>
>>Talk to me face-to-face when your head clears. OK?
>
> Once a person tells you to stop emailing them, you have to oblige.
That instruction isn't simple enough for him. He can't quite grasp it.
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>G. Morgan wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> It has to be done in order to warn anyone in the future who might be
>>>> tempted to email you or let you email them.
>>>
>>> I'm should setup a rule in T-Bird. All mail from BD gets forwarded to
>>> you for safekeeping in that country, and his ISP. He's gone from
>>> spamming me to what now sounds like extortion.
>>>
>>> Please retain any forwards I send your way, if you don't mind. I may
>>> need them to match my own copies if we end up in court.
>>
>>Wow!
>>
>>Strong stuff you're smoking, Graham? <shakes head>
>
> Fuck you.
>
>>Talk to me face-to-face when your head clears. OK?
>
> Once a person tells you to stop emailing them, you have to oblige.
> Otherwise its harassment. Is BT telecom open for 24/hr helpdesk support?
> Ask them, don't take my word.
>
> If you continue to send me email, they will be in touch with you.
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 8:05:10 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
>WTF? What, like 'I'll keep annoying you unless (something?)
Message-ID: <iaKdnQalf6PDsrrS...@bt.com>
>WTF? What, like 'I'll keep annoying you unless (something?)
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 8:11:30 PM1/30/12
to
too cryptic for me to make sense out of it.
grumpy
Jan 30, 2012, 10:32:06 PM1/30/12
to
On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
> You have a problem with my presence here?
>
> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>
everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
"problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
--
Mark my words, there's trouble a-brewin'. Felt it coming' all day.
This post was created using Thunderbird running on openSUSE.
Registered Linux User #393236
> You have a problem with my presence here?
>
> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>
everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
"problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
--
Mark my words, there's trouble a-brewin'. Felt it coming' all day.
This post was created using Thunderbird running on openSUSE.
Registered Linux User #393236
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 30, 2012, 10:57:10 PM1/30/12
to
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:rjcei7dkpeq1o1jbe...@Osama-is-dead.net...
why does he feel the need to inform you of what you already know?
Not only is he a really bad troll, he's also a very stupid one.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 30, 2012, 11:01:40 PM1/30/12
to
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:d5udnTda49fRdrjS...@giganews.com...
> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>
> |
> | "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
> | news:OOednf6j9q4JJrjS...@giganews.com...
>>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net>
>>>
> |>> Where did everyone go?
>>> Never left Rhonda.
> |
> | It's just really weird that there hasn't been a post since the 25th, so
> I
> | thought I'd send a test message (of sorts).
> |
> | Is BD still infesting the group?
> |
>
> Yes { sigh }
More's the pity.
From what I'm seeing, it appears he's lost it entirely.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 30, 2012, 11:00:54 PM1/30/12
to
news:6pcei7ptbrim0emcp...@Osama-is-dead.net...
It sounds like the ravings of a total loon.
auk is back in business. Send him over. The Cabal (tinc) will take care of
him.
auk is back in business. Send him over. The Cabal (tinc) will take care of
him.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Jan 30, 2012, 10:58:50 PM1/30/12
to
news:gudei75ebt7br9qld...@Osama-is-dead.net...
> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:24:47 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I bet you would.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>>>>
>>>>So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>>
>>> Oh boy...
>>
>>But is he stalking you, Rhonda or both of you?
>
> Me, I guess.
Must be. My account is locked.
>
>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:24:47 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She's been really nasty to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd really like to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I bet you would.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The truth *will* out, young man!
>>>>
>>>>So now you think G. Morgan and Rhonda are 'terrorists' or something?
>>>
>>> Oh boy...
>>
>>But is he stalking you, Rhonda or both of you?
>
> Me, I guess.
Nomen Nescio
Jan 30, 2012, 11:45:05 PM1/30/12
to
In article <f2fei71eu1o7voa47...@Osama-is-dead.net>
Moron-Morgan is beginning to sound more like Moron-Cook everyday with
these threats of his.
these threats of his.
G. Morgan
Jan 31, 2012, 12:36:09 AM1/31/12
to
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>
>"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
>news:rjcei7dkpeq1o1jbe...@Osama-is-dead.net...
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>>Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>
>>>She's been really nasty to me.
>>>
>>>Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>
>>>I'd really like to know.
>>
>> I bet you would.
>
>Simple logic would dictate that you already know I follow you on Twitter, so
>why does he feel the need to inform you of what you already know?
Whoa! You just totally blew my mind! <g>
>news:rjcei7dkpeq1o1jbe...@Osama-is-dead.net...
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>>Please shout that out *LOUDER* so all can hear!
>>>
>>>She's been really nasty to me.
>>>
>>>Why is she your *friend*, Graham?
>>>
>>>I'd really like to know.
>>
>> I bet you would.
>
>Simple logic would dictate that you already know I follow you on Twitter, so
>why does he feel the need to inform you of what you already know?
>Not only is he a really bad troll, he's also a very stupid one.
Sorry.
G. Morgan
Jan 31, 2012, 12:38:26 AM1/31/12
to
Lemme ask you a question, wiseass. If someone repeatedly emailed you
after nicely telling them to stop (many times), wouldn't you send a
complaint?
G. Morgan
Jan 31, 2012, 12:48:42 AM1/31/12
to
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
>news:6pcei7ptbrim0emcp...@Osama-is-dead.net...
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>>G. Morgan wrote:
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>>>
>>>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Do you really want me to post the reason here, Graham?
>>>
>>>You should realise by now that I *am* good at whatever I choose to do! ;-)
>>
>> I don't what the fuck you're talking about, but it sounds like a threat
>> of some sort.
>
>It sounds like the ravings of a total loon.
>
>auk is back in business. Send him over. The Cabal (tinc) will take care of
>him.
That has been on the table for a while. Also I distributed News Maestro
>
>"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
>news:6pcei7ptbrim0emcp...@Osama-is-dead.net...
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>>G. Morgan wrote:
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>> Where did everyone go?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask Graham on Twitter!
>>>>
>>>> WTF is that supposed to mean?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Do you really want me to post the reason here, Graham?
>>>
>>>You should realise by now that I *am* good at whatever I choose to do! ;-)
>>
>> I don't what the fuck you're talking about, but it sounds like a threat
>> of some sort.
>
>It sounds like the ravings of a total loon.
>
>auk is back in business. Send him over. The Cabal (tinc) will take care of
>him.
to a few in case we have to burn the mother down.
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 3:33:41 AM1/31/12
to
grumpy wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> You have a problem with my presence here?
>>
>> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>>
> everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
> "problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
You could change your friends, Max!
> On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> You have a problem with my presence here?
>>
>> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>>
> everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
> "problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
Have a great day! :-)
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:43:56 AM1/31/12
to
bd has a rather nasty Twitter account, however he has not used it ina while.
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in message
news:9op8p4...@mid.individual.net...
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in message
news:9op8p4...@mid.individual.net...
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:46:43 AM1/31/12
to
How is your law suit against the jenn basher coming along?
news:k8dei7hdgo4a9kl2h...@Osama-is-dead.net...
news:k8dei7hdgo4a9kl2h...@Osama-is-dead.net...
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:49:01 AM1/31/12
to
50/50 chance you are not the daddy of your wife's two children.
If you are man enough ask you who pleased her all those nights you were not
home,
She will now tell you Bullwinkle if you ask.
Back in the day it was some good shit to!
That was the only reason I stayed pals with a lying scum bag like you.
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:kdmdnQIRq574OrrS...@bt.com...
If you are man enough ask you who pleased her all those nights you were not
home,
She will now tell you Bullwinkle if you ask.
Back in the day it was some good shit to!
That was the only reason I stayed pals with a lying scum bag like you.
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:kdmdnQIRq574OrrS...@bt.com...
grumpy
Jan 31, 2012, 7:22:51 AM1/31/12
to
On 01/31/2012 03:33 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
> grumpy wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> You have a problem with my presence here?
>>>
>>> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>>>
>> everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
>> "problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
>
> You could change your friends, Max!
>
> Have a great day! :-)
>
you could stop being a pest,David(what a concept)
> grumpy wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> You have a problem with my presence here?
>>>
>>> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>>>
>> everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
>> "problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
>
> You could change your friends, Max!
>
> Have a great day! :-)
>
:(
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 12:29:43 PM1/31/12
to
grumpy wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 03:33 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> grumpy wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> You have a problem with my presence here?
>>>>
>>>> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>>>>
>>> everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
>>> "problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
>>
>> You could change your friends, Max!
>>
>> Have a great day! :-)
>>
> you could stop being a pest,David(what a concept)
>
> :(
Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
> On 01/31/2012 03:33 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> grumpy wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2012 05:27 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> You have a problem with my presence here?
>>>>
>>>> If so, please do explain so that others may understand your point.
>>>>
>>> everywhere you go there is a "problem". everyone i know on USENET has a
>>> "problem" with you. you're like 'the fly of USENET'
>>
>> You could change your friends, Max!
>>
>> Have a great day! :-)
>>
> you could stop being a pest,David(what a concept)
>
> :(
You appeared to be honest and truthful when first we 'met' and you have
given me no reason to think otherwise. You know full well that I've been
seeking out 'inconsistencies' in connection with malware and Cybercrime
- it's been a careful study of how posting persona inter-relate with
others.
This is not simply a technical matter - the anti-malware brigade are
doing their best, but they will *always* be one step behind the bad guys!
Peter Foldes
Jan 31, 2012, 1:10:10 PM1/31/12
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:HcWdnZDCcIqauLXS...@bt.com...
> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>
> You appeared to be honest and truthful when first we 'met' and you have given me
> no reason to think otherwise. You know full well that I've been seeking out
> 'inconsistencies' in connection with malware and Cybercrime - it's been a careful
> study of how posting persona inter-relate with others.
>
> This is not simply a technical matter - the anti-malware brigade are doing their
> best, but they will *always* be one step behind the bad guys!
>
JS
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 1:37:36 PM1/31/12
to
Btw - the truth *will* out! Just a matter of time :-)
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 3:35:53 PM1/31/12
to
news:jqudnVlIbohtqbXS...@bt.com..
Btw - the truth *will* out! Just a matter of time :-)
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.
OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."
bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on
I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.
Btw - the truth *will* out! Just a matter of time :-)
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DS...@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.
OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."
bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on
I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 5:20:34 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating,
How many more times do people have to tell you, cunt. You know exactly
> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating,
what you do that's so fucking irritating.
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 5:39:47 PM1/31/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>
> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
> what you do that's so irritating.
Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open
and friendly discussion.
I seek only the truth. :-)
Peter Foldes
Jan 31, 2012, 5:55:38 PM1/31/12
to
******************Crossposting removed *****************************************
news:T8idneUcjcop8LXS...@bt.com...
> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open and
> friendly discussion.
>
> I seek only the truth. :-)
Bullshit to the above.
WTF did you have to add crossposting with your post here you lying sack of shit. Go
and Troll Trish or your son
news:T8idneUcjcop8LXS...@bt.com...
> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open and
> friendly discussion.
>
> I seek only the truth. :-)
WTF did you have to add crossposting with your post here you lying sack of shit. Go
and Troll Trish or your son
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 6:11:16 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:39:47 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>
>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly what
>> you do that's so irritating.
>
> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth
Not your problem, cunt.
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>
>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly what
>> you do that's so irritating.
>
> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth
> and/or will not have an open
> and friendly discussion.
willing to have open and honest discussions with us.
Obviously you don't behave in the requisite way for that to happen. It's
up to you to change your behaviour, not to others to change their wishes
to converse with assholes like you.
>
> I seek only the truth.
can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
It's all your behaviour deserves.
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 6:36:03 PM1/31/12
to
*YOUR* behaviour deserves no response.
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 6:45:31 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:36:03 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> Keep doing what you're doing exactly as you keep doing it, cunt, and I
>> can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
>> It's all your behaviour deserves.
> Aardvark wrote:
>> Keep doing what you're doing exactly as you keep doing it, cunt, and I
>> can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
>> It's all your behaviour deserves.
> *YOUR* behaviour deserves no response.
LOL. Don't take it out on me that you can't even handle the truth. And
never mention again that you want the truth.
You obviously don't.
grumpy
Jan 31, 2012, 8:59:19 PM1/31/12
to
<excessive crosspost retained>
On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>
>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>> what you do that's so irritating.
>
> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open
> and friendly discussion.
>
> I seek only the truth. :-)
>
here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>
>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>> what you do that's so irritating.
>
> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open
> and friendly discussion.
>
> I seek only the truth. :-)
>
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 5:24:51 AM2/1/12
to
PKB
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9sek$el2$2...@dont-email.me...
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9sek$el2$2...@dont-email.me...
~BD~
Feb 1, 2012, 5:30:18 AM2/1/12
to
> PKB
IAWTP
~BD~
Feb 1, 2012, 6:32:48 AM2/1/12
to
grumpy wrote:
> <excessive crosspost retained>
>
> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>
>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>
>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open
>> and friendly discussion.
>>
>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>
> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
> <excessive crosspost retained>
>
> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>
>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>
>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an open
>> and friendly discussion.
>>
>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>
> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 6:37:44 AM2/1/12
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
SeaNymph
Feb 1, 2012, 6:39:39 AM2/1/12
to
On 1/31/2012 5:45 PM, Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:36:03 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>> Keep doing what you're doing exactly as you keep doing it, cunt, and I
>>> can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
>
>>> It's all your behaviour deserves.
>
>
>> *YOUR* behaviour deserves no response.
>
> LOL. Don't take it out on me that you can't even handle the truth. And
> never mention again that you want the truth.
>
> You obviously don't.
>
>
>
If your behavior deserves no response, why does he respond?
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:36:03 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>> Keep doing what you're doing exactly as you keep doing it, cunt, and I
>>> can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
>
>>> It's all your behaviour deserves.
>
>
>> *YOUR* behaviour deserves no response.
>
> LOL. Don't take it out on me that you can't even handle the truth. And
> never mention again that you want the truth.
>
> You obviously don't.
>
>
>
OldGringo38
Feb 1, 2012, 6:43:35 AM2/1/12
to
--
Just West Of Nowhere
Enjoy Life And Live It To Its Fullest As
It Has An Expiration Date
Support Bacteria: They Are The Only Culture Some People Have
SeaNymph
Feb 1, 2012, 8:03:33 AM2/1/12
to
On 2/1/2012 5:43 AM, OldGringo38 wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 05:39 AM, SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 1/31/2012 5:45 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:36:03 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Keep doing what you're doing exactly as you keep doing it, cunt, and I
>>>>> can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
>>>
>>>>> It's all your behaviour deserves.
>>>
>>>
>>>> *YOUR* behaviour deserves no response.
>>>
>>> LOL. Don't take it out on me that you can't even handle the truth. And
>>> never mention again that you want the truth.
>>>
>>> You obviously don't.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> If your behavior deserves no response, why does he respond?
>>
>
> Out of Courtesy? :)
>
ROFL...I doubt that.
> On 02/01/2012 05:39 AM, SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 1/31/2012 5:45 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:36:03 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Keep doing what you're doing exactly as you keep doing it, cunt, and I
>>>>> can guarantee you 100% that all you'll get is fucking bullshit.
>>>
>>>>> It's all your behaviour deserves.
>>>
>>>
>>>> *YOUR* behaviour deserves no response.
>>>
>>> LOL. Don't take it out on me that you can't even handle the truth. And
>>> never mention again that you want the truth.
>>>
>>> You obviously don't.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> If your behavior deserves no response, why does he respond?
>>
>
> Out of Courtesy? :)
>
OldGringo38
Feb 1, 2012, 8:22:13 AM2/1/12
to
Grumpy
Feb 1, 2012, 12:38:56 PM2/1/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> grumpy wrote:
>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>
>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>
>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly what
>>>> you do that's so irritating.
>>>
>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>
>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>
>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>
> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>
> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
more slimy innuendo.
> grumpy wrote:
>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>
>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>
>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly what
>>>> you do that's so irritating.
>>>
>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>
>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>
>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>
> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>
> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
here we see another example of irritating behavior.
--
Mark my words, there's trouble a-brewin'. Felt it coming' all day.
This post was created using Pan running on openSUSE.
Mark my words, there's trouble a-brewin'. Felt it coming' all day.
Registered Linux User #393236
--
Mark my words, there's trouble a-brewin'. Felt it coming' all day.
#393236
~BD~
Feb 1, 2012, 12:46:52 PM2/1/12
to
Grumpy wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> grumpy wrote:
>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>
>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly what
>>>>> you do that's so irritating.
>>>>
>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>
>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>
>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>>
>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>
> more slimy innuendo.
> here we see another example of irritating behavior.
Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
Your choice, of course.
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> grumpy wrote:
>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>
>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly what
>>>>> you do that's so irritating.
>>>>
>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>
>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>
>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>>
>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>
> more slimy innuendo.
> here we see another example of irritating behavior.
Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
Grumpy
Feb 1, 2012, 1:14:12 PM2/1/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:46:52 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Grumpy wrote:
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> grumpy wrote:
>>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>>>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>>
>>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly
>>> discussion."
>>>
>>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>>
>> more slimy innuendo.
>> here we see another example of irritating behavior.
>
> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>
> Your choice, of course.
starting a discussion with "Do you have something you are trying to hide,
> Grumpy wrote:
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> grumpy wrote:
>>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>>>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>>
>>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly
>>> discussion."
>>>
>>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>>
>> more slimy innuendo.
>> here we see another example of irritating behavior.
>
> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>
> Your choice, of course.
Max?" doesn't seem very "friendly" to me.
--
Registered Linux User #393236
Aardvark
Feb 1, 2012, 1:15:55 PM2/1/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:38:56 +0000, Grumpy wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> grumpy wrote:
>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>
>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>>>
>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>
>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>
>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>>
>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>
> more slimy innuendo.
Does he do it on purpose or is it innate and subconscious, though?
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> grumpy wrote:
>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>
>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>>>
>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>
>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>
>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly discussion."
>>
>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>
> more slimy innuendo.
> here we see another example of irritating behavior.
>
Aardvark
Feb 1, 2012, 1:19:48 PM2/1/12
to
invitations to parties any more.
Grumpy
Feb 1, 2012, 1:22:40 PM2/1/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:15:55 +0000, Aardvark wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:38:56 +0000, Grumpy wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> grumpy wrote:
>>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>>>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>>
>>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly
>>> discussion."
>>>
>>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>>
>> more slimy innuendo.
>
> Does he do it on purpose or is it innate and subconscious, though?
on purpose,I'm sure
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:38:56 +0000, Grumpy wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:32:48 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> grumpy wrote:
>>>> <excessive crosspost retained>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2012 05:39 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:29:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please explain just what it is which you find so irritating, Max.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many more times do people have to tell you. You know exactly
>>>>>> what you do that's so irritating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some people on Usenet do not tell the truth and/or will not have an
>>>>> open and friendly discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I seek only the truth. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> here we see an example of 1st irritating behavior
>>>
>>> Just as I said "... you will not have an open and friendly
>>> discussion."
>>>
>>> Do you have something you are trying to hide, Max?
>>
>> more slimy innuendo.
>
> Does he do it on purpose or is it innate and subconscious, though?
>> here we see another example of irritating behavior.
>>
>>
> Two down, umpteen to go.
Grumpy
Feb 1, 2012, 1:28:34 PM2/1/12
to
anti-freeze.
Aardvark
Feb 1, 2012, 3:05:15 PM2/1/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 3:50:35 PM2/1/12
to
False. He makes passes at the young ones...thus
he is shunned mostly now and watched closely.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jgbvo4$eq2$4...@dont-email.me...
he is shunned mostly now and watched closely.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
0 new messages