Anyone heard any news from dingo?
Are there any remailers left that allow custom From headers,
properly, without adding text to the message body?
thanks
> Are there any remailers left that allow custom From headers,
> properly, without adding text to the message body?
hastio and panta support fully customisable From headers
banana supports nickname only
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
There is one remailer that does that. I have the info somewhere around
here. Yes, here it is.
$remailer{"eelbash"} = "<eel...@teksavvy.com> cpunk mix hybrid pgp latent
ek ekx esub cut hash post repgp remix reord ext max test inflt75 rhop5
klen98";
eelbash eel...@teksavvy.com 77784f27a28d30cae68d328fd3e98b63
2.0.4b46-reliable CN
-----Begin Mix Key-----
77784f27a28d30cae68d328fd3e98b63
258
AAS+zB1UNlBHa/vA2hr+qby02TjaYYVVPRgE1cq8
E7/RGRHlEQ/DmG8dirk4SHKJk0aVmrJOG5pFG46s
bd1N4vdZ9/dJWNA+v0dIjHtFWlwtMKxwEK86kTHh
EfdzGAln7efIjjahzM5Xv7j9vV4BjKhBmQWcSxp3
ACp/T+M2RNxJzQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAB
-----End Mix Key-----
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>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=jv6L
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
w
Instead of looking for a particular exit remailer that does what you
want, send the message through any exit remailer, but use
mail...@newsanon.yi.org as your only gateway.
Include in the body, starting in column 1:
x-himmel: joe blow <joe...@abc.invalid>
where joe blow.... is the From header you want to appear in your message.
This is obviously far easier than trying to remember which remailer
allows what part of the 'from' header and whether or not it has a
disclaimer in the message body, and whether or not it is working well or
is likely to lose your message.
Choose an exit remailer that you know is reliable and you will have
your full 'from' header with no disclaimer.
If you need more info see: http://eelbash.yi.org:8080/info/remm2n.html
> In article <2007051012510...@anonymous.poster>
> joe blow <joe...@abc.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:39:36 +0100, Anonymous wrote:
>>
>> Instead of looking for a particular exit remailer that does what you
>> want, send the message through any exit remailer, but use
>> mail...@newsanon.yi.org as your only gateway.
>>
>
> That's nice, but doesn't aioe limit the number of posts per day?
Not with the business account.
Yer kiddin', right? Eelbash isn't abusing aioe is he?
Oh well, since nobody's complained about not being able to post I guess
it means absolutely nobody is using his stupid "newsanon" crap, because
the limit is like 25 a day . :)
Doesn't aioe offer anonymous access through a Tor hidden service anyway?
So what's the point of "newsanon" except to give an Internet peeping Tom
more chances to mastrubate over someone's messages?
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:39:36 +0100 (BST), Anonymous wrote in
> Message-Id: <ba315860d2521e0b...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>:
>
> > Are there any remailers left that allow custom From headers,
> > properly, without adding text to the message body?
Frell is still working but has disappeared from austria's stats,
anyone know why?
> hastio and panta support fully customisable From headers
hastio and panta vandalize the message body.
> In article <f1v0d9$79p$1...@bananasplit.info>
> Zax <ad...@bananasplit.info> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:39:36 +0100 (BST), Anonymous wrote in
> > Message-Id: <ba315860d2521e0b...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>:
> >
> > > Are there any remailers left that allow custom From headers,
> > > properly, without adding text to the message body?
> >
> > hastio and panta support fully customisable From headers
> > banana supports nickname only
> >
>
> My stats source, noreply.org, doesn't list hastio.
Pick a better stats source. These do...
austria
banana
bikikii
citrus
cside
equars
frell
george
gurski
panta
pboxmix
randseed
senshi
> Zax <ad...@bananasplit.info> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:39:36 +0100 (BST), Anonymous wrote in
>> Message-Id: <ba315860d2521e0b...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>:
>>
>> > Are there any remailers left that allow custom From headers,
>> > properly, without adding text to the message body?
>
> Frell is still working but has disappeared from austria's stats,
> anyone know why?
Beats me, but it's gone from the Banana stats as well.
> > > Are there any remailers left that allow custom From headers,
> > > properly, without adding text to the message body?
> >
> > hastio and panta support fully customisable From headers
> > banana supports nickname only
>
> My stats source, noreply.org, doesn't list hastio.
> And, I thought panta needs hashcash?
Panta needs hashcash but it's not difficult to use.
The problem is, panta trashes your message with a "trailer."
Anonymous schrieb:
> Frell is still working but has disappeared from austria's stats,
> anyone know why?
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
I added a spam filter to the remailer address lately to reduce the number
of remailer help files sent out in response to spam from faked addresses.
It seems a frelled typo in this spam filter (mailln/ != mailin/) caused
remailer-* requests to be filed to the wrong directory where mixmaster
would not process them.
My own pingers still showed good stats because I configured them for longer
timeouts of remailer-conf data. Also, only remailer-* requests were
affected, normal mix or cpunk messages were remailed just fine. Other
echolot pingers timed out earlier and dropped frell last week.
The matter has been resolved and frell already showed up on other pingers
again.
Frell Remailer Admins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRkQnVmaR/ww89Cq9AQLDLwgAwCTU+X8bXKks5hu41ZXxiHPCgFZWHzV1
mNeYhONp/0kX8P3ukzQDkshy8kILrl1HHXTGAAbgY2fsTL0DRTDdB0/mtSOMl1Ge
GwsgMCJHOHi2jdyIYcWW0xooeOUFWS0cb6PAhgUpSNWvDSBkoq4n7h/vzf4IeBDv
E1Z9WT50btDOyoQV+GE5jfQnEeCEbMK9ya6YTq3sFaUBGZGM3RW4lFIRQGS3DXwJ
o6hkeBAW2MRETwkCtmvPoAlGtHF0S7u4BIfIIscDfXHiy3hsq9cuXGF73aBWuWXA
7vn/racvw5Yvt42GB2GkXV6AZVupdfs17cvBpg2I0SsIjOWXVSUstA==
=wREx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I think Eelbash has run out of options and uses aioe as a last resort.
That is good sign actually :-)
Thomas
--
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
> Anonymous wrote:
> [snip]
> > Doesn't aioe offer anonymous access through a Tor hidden service anyway?
> > So what's the point of "newsanon" except to give an Internet peeping Tom
> > more chances to mastrubate over someone's messages?
>
> I think Eelbash has run out of options and uses aioe as a last resort.
> That is good sign actually :-)
No it's not for several reasons. First of all it's not true. The Path
header in eelbash posts starts with Teksavvy.
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> I think you still have a problem. frell is not responding to
> remailer-key requests and has not been responding for weeks.
Yes, it had not been responding for a week or two.
Outstanding remailer-* requests were not lost and should have been
processed by now. Please try again.
And please check your spam filters. I noticed that with default settings,
remailer-key replies score just below spamassassin's default threshold,
mainly because I deliver all mail directly from my dynamic residential ADSL
IP address:
X-Spam-Report:
* 2.0 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
* -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
* [85.177.243.243 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
* 2.0 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
* [85.177.243.243 listed in combined.njabl.org]
* 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase
Frell Remailer Admins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRkTpfGaR/ww89Cq9AQIyQAf/ZOidm1tjtETJV3xxls4d4Cp2IWIkd5D2
erm1ViiftsKPtgosz8F6evOiXgZD/yMVrmG8Gd9+CQXKfgYvYXukirhtD6NMCiwo
kSg20bCfgJmtl4doqFeKXzsl7hSNJF0e9qKmkWGJi7Cq9Tg/2h0Esqs8D5l6hrqb
SJ4WmlFpFC8ePh3ifGOhxRtNCHN+dOuhTtwn4XwMrrZKzCMKldrB6l2hWe2IwNzC
lWhW/dcQ3MFnCi5MZNqnEg+xToTaqL4u2yFXh+wbIvPvdWwOEWjc/4JlkY6tvI7P
mJYmGFO03ELAfZd3Zlk10vQLE36eh715CwP4F7l+ntdi6WxfS1MPAA==
=2Rna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
George Orwell wrote:
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
>> Anonymous wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Doesn't aioe offer anonymous access through a Tor hidden service anyway?
>>> So what's the point of "newsanon" except to give an Internet peeping Tom
>>> more chances to mastrubate over someone's messages?
>> I think Eelbash has run out of options and uses aioe as a last resort.
>> That is good sign actually :-)
>
> No it's not for several reasons. First of all it's not true. The Path
> header in eelbash posts starts with Teksavvy.
Are we looking at the same signature joe blow message promoting Eelbash
Services?
Besides, Path: headers are not to be trusted and can be preloaded.
Do check out this page. It talks about it being unacceptable for use as
an exit for your remailer server. If Eelbash Admin starts using it and
it gets some traffic there it will be blocked in no time.
Nothing people that avoid Eelbash Services will notice of course..
However, you made me curious about the message with the preloaded
Teksavvy header?! What is it's Message-ID?
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRkXgqwEP2l8iXKAJAQHdSQMfU/xuSuELSrkB55SaoNWDasvA55YvrsCE
6EQm5V0beJLVs1IY5MJ16iLiZ6RAJZZudGfQYE/I1pixILAGLbDv3EX0YPyxTOuw
NN8jLAGddsdj/4fVu7ESHkvpibG6iK/FSaEsUQ==
=7L0G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> I think Eelbash has run out of options and uses aioe as a last
> >> resort. That is good sign actually :-)
> >
> > No it's not for several reasons. First of all it's not true. The
> > Path header in eelbash posts starts with Teksavvy.
>
> Are we looking at the same signature joe blow message promoting
> Eelbash Services?
I don't have a clue what the fuck you're looking at, in fact it's
pretty obvious you don't either, but I'm looking at messages posted
through the other dumbfuck's M2N. They're posted through Teksavvy.
Period. We've even had this discussion in this group before you
dullard, complete with threats to report your twin brother to his ISP
abuse addresses for using his home account for "commercial" purposes.
>
> Besides, Path: headers are not to be trusted and can be preloaded.
Yeah, whatever. Once the post leaves your machine it doesn't matter
what you've "preloaded" and aioe doesn't show up anywhere. The Path is
pretty clearly not a forged one, if you're bright enough to look at the
right posts and comprehend what you see.
Sorry about your luck.
> However, you made me curious about the message with the preloaded
> Teksavvy header?! What is it's Message-ID?
You really are the world's biggest moron.
The last post just was made here just a couple days ago with something
along the lines of "check these headers" or "if these headers" in it,
and there's nothing preloaded about them.
Better hurry and Google, moron, because the author XNA'd it.
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
>
>>>> I think Eelbash has run out of options and uses aioe as a last
>>>> resort. That is good sign actually :-)
>>> No it's not for several reasons. First of all it's not true. The
>>> Path header in eelbash posts starts with Teksavvy.
>> Are we looking at the same signature joe blow message promoting
>> Eelbash Services?
>
> I don't have a clue what the fuck you're looking at, in fact it's
> pretty obvious you don't either, but I'm looking at messages posted
> through the other dumbfuck's M2N. They're posted through Teksavvy.
> Period. We've even had this discussion in this group before you
> dullard, complete with threats to report your twin brother to his ISP
> abuse addresses for using his home account for "commercial" purposes.
Well, I don't know what the hell you are talking about, but since my
twin brother happens to be in jail, I guess you are correct about this.
>> Besides, Path: headers are not to be trusted and can be preloaded.
>
> Yeah, whatever. Once the post leaves your machine it doesn't matter
> what you've "preloaded" and aioe doesn't show up anywhere. The Path is
> pretty clearly not a forged one, if you're bright enough to look at the
> right posts and comprehend what you see.
I shall call you the path header oracle from now on.
> Sorry about your luck.
>
>> However, you made me curious about the message with the preloaded
>> Teksavvy header?! What is it's Message-ID?
>
> You really are the world's biggest moron.
>
> The last post just was made here just a couple days ago with something
> along the lines of "check these headers" or "if these headers" in it,
> and there's nothing preloaded about them.
Can you at least tell me what thread it was in? Was it this thread?
Because I didn't see it and I am on one of the best news servers in the
world.
> Better hurry and Google, moron, because the author XNA'd it.
I'll try.
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRkhBzAEP2l8iXKAJAQHDYgMgp07OkdQ19OkxeYU/EJ49tZS6S3VZrYjx
4iAsrqvYWCQIHhALddloyFg5sGKCqQmCbqaRg+VHWrP5g74uWrrsJJFMEkGtwAbi
BW5+pUPqngz+p4YTYnN7PWuZWHLdzrNvYXpxWQ==
=302X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>>> The last post just was made here just a couple days ago with something
>>> along the lines of "check these headers" or "if these headers" in it,
>>> and there's nothing preloaded about them.
>> Can you at least tell me what thread it was in? Was it this thread?
>> Because I didn't see it and I am on one of the best news servers in the
>> world.
>
> Yes, in this thread.
> Message-ID: <d017ffdbbb0998bc...@pseudo.borked.net>
Must have been a glitch then..
!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!TEKSAVVY.COM-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRkhjFwEP2l8iXKAJAQGaxwMgoPfRLi0zd9sB2U26Hdk9F/gO7wWfT99P
qU2S7OtessKj7YdoUaF6xTpgI6Hsti8uUrWFC1JHG3j47tHtl8MnT8WJdY1gDY4Z
niLkiOUeojlIvttkIqKVb97wqIoK0dJq63xR0Q==
=fVSD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> >>> The last post just was made here just a couple days ago with something
> >>> along the lines of "check these headers" or "if these headers" in it,
> >>> and there's nothing preloaded about them.
> >> Can you at least tell me what thread it was in? Was it this thread?
> >> Because I didn't see it and I am on one of the best news servers in the
> >> world.
> >
> > Yes, in this thread.
> > Message-ID: <d017ffdbbb0998bc...@pseudo.borked.net>
>
> Must have been a glitch then..
>
> !news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!TEKSAVVY.COM-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
A "glitch"??
The proof you were whining about is in the very thread you're whining
IN, and when someone finally gets tired of watching you dance at the
end of a string and clueslaps you with it, rather than just say "ooops
I made a mistake" you make yourself look like an even bigger jackass
with this sort of per-pubescent stupidity?
You look more and more like Eelbash every day. Seriously.
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > > Yes, in this thread. Message-ID:
> > > <d017ffdbbb0998bc...@pseudo.borked.net>
> >
> > Must have been a glitch then..
> >
> > !news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!TEKSAVVY.COM-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
>
> A "glitch"??
>
> The proof you were whining about is in the very thread you're whining
> IN, and when someone finally gets tired of watching you dance at the
> end of a string and clueslaps you with it, rather than just say
> "ooops I made a mistake" you make yourself look like an even bigger
> jackass with this sort of per-pubescent stupidity?
>
> You look more and more like Eelbash every day. Seriously.
Careful now, or you'll touch off another "Frogs Everywhere!" psychotic
episode.
You do realize it takes up to six weeks to readjust Boschloony's meds
after one of his relapses, don't you? That's a lot of taxpayer money
you're piddling away. ;)
> !news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!TEKSAVVY.COM-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-fo
> r-mail
> The jackass here is not the previous poster.
You truly are dumb as a dog turd. See "TEKSAVVY" in there? See
"aioe.org" anywhere at all?? Do you have even a tiny shred of a clue
about who "usenetserver.com" is, you blubbering moron?
The header you posted *PROVES* your twin brother eeltard is using the
Usenet access provided by his account at Teksavvy as a M2N gateway.
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:39:36 +0100, Anonymous wrote:
> Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for- mail
Now THAT'S a fudged path header. Pretty amateruish attempt for sure.
Easy to spot because Zax's erver shows up AFTER aioe.org but the post
wasn't read from there, and the Message-ID is wrong. Definitely the
sort of pathetic forgery a half wit like eeldork might try to use to
draw attention away from the fact he's using is ISP news server as
a public gateway.
> From: joe blow <joe...@abc.invalid>
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
> Subject: Re: Where's frell? No good custom From remailers left?
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:51:05 +0200 (CEST)
> Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
> Lines: 29
> Message-ID: <2007051012510...@anonymous.poster>
> References: <ba315860d2521e0b...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: CBwWCirB9XNlcXOJ+F3K5g.user.aioe.org
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@aioe.org
> X-Complaints: ad...@eelbash.yi.org. Include 777 in the subject to get through the spam filters
> Xref: usenetserver.com alt.privacy.anon-server:544116
> X-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:51:06 EDT (text.usenetserver.com)
What's your point? That eeltard posts through half a dozen different
places using a dozen different pseudonyms and incompetently forged
headers?
Thanks, but we already knew that. And what does it have to do with the
solitary post we've seen made by someone else through his M2N which
came through teksavy in the first place?
On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:11:11 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell wrote in
Message-Id: <b9106d18d6c4f7aa...@mixmaster.it>:
>> Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for- mail
>
> Now THAT'S a fudged path header. Pretty amateruish attempt for sure.
> Easy to spot because Zax's erver shows up AFTER aioe.org but the post
> wasn't read from there, and the Message-ID is wrong. Definitely the
> sort of pathetic forgery a half wit like eeldork might try to use to
> draw attention away from the fact he's using is ISP news server as
> a public gateway.
Actually I think it's probably genuine. :)
news.mixmin.net is operated by me, but it's not the news server I link
my remailer or mail2news gateways to (news.bananasplit.info). The
mixmin one is a big news server with lots of peers, one of which is
aioe. Currently it's ranked at about 400 (www.top1000.org) which means
it's name will appear in a lot of Usenet postings.
news.mixmin.net is (currently) wide open for reading but will only
accept posts made via SSL.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGSXeAlKZ6CY7Vd0MRCkeqAKD5eO4SFEFoj8PGKfXYgY3oo8iKsACeI9bC
2ksj0sVt7f+tS+SD6h0Ka+8=
=GcXE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
> Anonymous <nob...@mixmin.net> wrote:
>
> > Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for- mail
>
> Now THAT'S a fudged path header. Pretty amateruish attempt for sure.
> Easy to spot because Zax's erver shows up AFTER aioe.org but the post
> wasn't read from there, and the Message-ID is wrong.
You're not by any chance the same poster who would not believe a mixmaster
remailer could be run from cron? You're wrong again and you would have
noticed that if you had done your homework.
a) Zax's server shows up after aioe.org because they both have a news
peering. Can you imagine such a thing?
b) "the post wasn't read from there"? What's that supposed to mean? The
post was posted there. Read the article from there and look at its path
header:
telnet news.aioe.org 119
Trying 194.177.96.78...
Connected to news.aioe.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
200 aioe.org InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.4.4 (20060818 snapshot) ready (posting ok).
head <2007051012510...@anonymous.poster>
221 0 <2007051012510...@anonymous.poster> head
Path: aioe.org!not-for-mail
[...]
c) What the fuck should be wrong with the Message-ID? Looks fine to me.
Maybe it's too heavy for your fragile mind.
> Definitely the
> sort of pathetic forgery a half wit like eeldork might try to use
> to draw attention away from the fact he's using is ISP news server as
> a public gateway.
Definitely the sort of pathetic incompetence a stupid loudmouth like you
might try to use to draw attention away from the fact he was proven wrong
over and over again.
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
[snip]
>> Must have been a glitch then..
>>
>> !news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!TEKSAVVY.COM-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
>
> A "glitch"??
>
> The proof you were whining about is in the very thread you're whining
> IN, and when someone finally gets tired of watching you dance at the
> end of a string and clueslaps you with it, rather than just say "ooops
> I made a mistake" you make yourself look like an even bigger jackass
> with this sort of per-pubescent stupidity?
>
> You look more and more like Eelbash every day. Seriously.
I will ask you a question to ponder about.
What is more likely. A glitch on one of Eelbash's services?
Or me admitting *I* made a glitch posting about glitches in Eelbash's
services?
Think hard! I know you can do it!
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRkmSUAEP2l8iXKAJAQGpjQMeK4cAibi2tXUdHnV7MWp623wzqIwrnVGf
DNCdtFde5Fkrqk89v8QxQ6dL8RvSaVUvChBmbljCAgcPVdMUeCWa/xVGbyuFbEVA
v/0PxM7/C5QlRuqbwjS2b/1SVNTqNhziOwGmsQ==
=DWS0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Anonymous <nob...@mixmin.net> wrote:
>
> > Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for- mail
>
> Now THAT'S a fudged path header.
No, it's the path header for the joe blow post Thomas saw that prompted his
comment about aioe.
>
>Pretty amateruish attempt for sure.
Now who's the moron?
> Easy to spot because Zax's erver shows up AFTER aioe.org but the post
> wasn't read from there, and the Message-ID is wrong.
You really are a dimwit. The post is there for anyone to see.
> Definitely the
> sort of pathetic forgery a half wit like eeldork might try to use to
> draw attention away from the fact he's using is ISP news server as
> a public gateway.
>
> > From: joe blow <joe...@abc.invalid>
> > Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
> > Subject: Re: Where's frell? No good custom From remailers left?
> > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:51:05 +0200 (CEST)
> > Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
> > Lines: 29
> > Message-ID: <2007051012510...@anonymous.poster>
> > References: <ba315860d2521e0b...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>
> > NNTP-Posting-Host: CBwWCirB9XNlcXOJ+F3K5g.user.aioe.org
> > X-Complaints-To: ab...@aioe.org
> > X-Complaints: ad...@eelbash.yi.org. Include 777 in the subject to get through the spam filters
> > Xref: usenetserver.com alt.privacy.anon-server:544116
> > X-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:51:06 EDT (text.usenetserver.com)
>
> What's your point? That eeltard posts through half a dozen different
> places using a dozen different pseudonyms and incompetently forged
> headers?
My point was to show where the confusion arose that started this childish
tirade of yours. Grow up.
> My point was to show where the confusion arose that started this childish
> tirade of yours. Grow up.
And childish tirades make up the majority of the posts in this group. Who
is going to take remailers seriousl when the flagship group for remailers
is in this state?
You?
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRknIuQEP2l8iXKAJAQH0CwMdGFd190yMkn4zdubfidnajsQrcVLKOtrV
za71kqF9Aue1s7l+h1Iyz36L7s6GuW8E5q8F4khCGt/GwVU6cbtenm0+q+92W8Kj
Skj19OEvQCNeZ6ft7rMH36mFj11KdBFRKrPKfw==
=faDj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:11:11 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell wrote in
> Message-Id: <b9106d18d6c4f7aa...@mixmaster.it>:
>
> >> Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for- mail
> >
> > Now THAT'S a fudged path header. Pretty amateruish attempt for sure.
> > Easy to spot because Zax's erver shows up AFTER aioe.org but the post
> > wasn't read from there, and the Message-ID is wrong. Definitely the
> > sort of pathetic forgery a half wit like eeldork might try to use to
> > draw attention away from the fact he's using is ISP news server as
> > a public gateway.
>
> Actually I think it's probably genuine. :)
No, actually it's probably not.
Look at the headers again Zax. It's not just eh Path that's been
jiggered up. ;)
> Actually I think it's probably genuine. :)
This header debate is amusing, because you're both "right".
The header is probably genuine, but Eelbash does in fact use
his Techsavvy [sic] news account to post messages also, as
we've just seen demonstrated.
I think the point is that aioe wasn't meant to be used this way
so he's abusing that free service, and his own personal news
account that's included with his Internet access *certainly*
isn't supposed to be shared. Either way you slice it the cretin
is taking advantage of something he shouldn't be, all the while
prattling on and on about the "ethics and morality" of the
remailer network and its users.
The whole thing is really nothing more than a relatively minor
example of typical Eelbash tomfoolery and hypocrisy. It may not
please aioe and techsavvy very much if complaints are lodged,
and it doesn't do the network any good to have nodes acting this
way, but as far as the remailer network goes it's not nearly as
insidious as some of the other crap he's pulled over the years
like attacking other operators, modifying posts, and sneaking in
multiple remailers.
In fact, I'd wager Eelbash is pleased as punch that people are
spatting over this irrelevant detail for a while. ;-)
A lot more than would take remailers seriously if they were all
run by operators like Eelbash. That is for sure. Petty bickering
in a USenet news group can't hold a candle to someone who
pretends to be a "concerned participant" just to promote their
own agenda of snooping, censoring, outing, flooding, and
directly attacking both operators and users.
> joe blow wrote:
> >
> > And childish tirades make up the majority of the posts in this group. Who
> > is going to take remailers seriousl when the flagship group for remailers
> > is in this state?
>
> You?
Eelbash? Taking remailers seriously? Surely, you must be joking.
> In fact, I'd wager Eelbash is pleased as punch that people are
> spatting over this irrelevant detail for a while. ;-)
I don't know about eelbash but I find it disgusting that THE newsgroup
devoted to remailers has 'experts' who go on and on about such
trivialities and do it in such a childish manner.
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:11:11 +0200 (CEST)
> George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> > Anonymous <nob...@mixmin.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for- mail
> >
> > Now THAT'S a fudged path header.
>
> No, it's the path header for the joe blow post Thomas saw that prompted his
> comment about aioe.
Right. It's an eelbash post that God knows what's been done to.
Just a couple days ago we saw one posted from a user, and THAT header
was completely different.
> >
> >Pretty amateruish attempt for sure.
>
> Now who's the moron?
Anyone who trusts "Joe Blow". :)
>
> > Easy to spot because Zax's erver shows up AFTER aioe.org but the post
> > wasn't read from there, and the Message-ID is wrong.
>
> You really are a dimwit. The post is there for anyone to see.
There's a lot of posts there for everyone to see. Some forged, some
not. That's what we're trying to sort out, and you seem to be wanting
to trust the guy suspected of doing most of the forging over everyone
else.
Why would that be?
>
> > Definitely the
> > sort of pathetic forgery a half wit like eeldork might try to use to
> > draw attention away from the fact he's using is ISP news server as
> > a public gateway.
> >
> > > From: joe blow <joe...@abc.invalid>
> > > Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
> > > Subject: Re: Where's frell? No good custom From remailers left?
> > > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:51:05 +0200 (CEST)
> > > Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
> > > Lines: 29
> > > Message-ID: <2007051012510...@anonymous.poster>
> > > References: <ba315860d2521e0b...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>
> > > NNTP-Posting-Host: CBwWCirB9XNlcXOJ+F3K5g.user.aioe.org
> > > X-Complaints-To: ab...@aioe.org
> > > X-Complaints: ad...@eelbash.yi.org. Include 777 in the subject to get through the spam filters
> > > Xref: usenetserver.com alt.privacy.anon-server:544116
> > > X-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:51:06 EDT (text.usenetserver.com)
> >
> > What's your point? That eeltard posts through half a dozen different
> > places using a dozen different pseudonyms and incompetently forged
> > headers?
>
> My point was to show where the confusion arose that started this childish
> tirade of yours. Grow up.
Thre really isn't any confusion. Eelbash uses his own ISP account for
the M2N, and posts through whatever himself.
>
> I don't know about eelbash but I find it disgusting that THE newsgroup
> devoted to remailers has 'experts' who go on and on about such
> trivialities and do it in such a childish manner.
SHUT UP, EELBASH!
Didn't see that coming, did you?
Please provide evidence of these serious charges.
> What is more likely. A glitch on one of Eelbash's services?
> Or me admitting *I* made a glitch posting about glitches in Eelbash's
> services?
What sort of stupid question is that?
Eelbash's entire life is nothing but one clusterfuck after another,
usually a product of his own stupidity just like this is. You at least
have a "legitimate excuse" for being a complete shagwit, but no way
does it cover what childish little dickhead you are.
You wouldn't admit you were wrong even if it sounded better than
whatever pathetic excuse for wit your misfiring little brain can come
up with. Neither would your twin brother Eelbash, and his brand of
"wit" is exactly as finely honed as yours.
You two really are more alike than you are different. If Eelbash would
finally come out of the closet and admit he's a medically diagnosed
fruitcake we couldn't tell you two apart at all. Neither one of you
could poor you own piss out of your shoes if we wrote instructions on
the heels, and you'd both use the excuse that you liked wet feet when
people asked you why you smell like piss.
Borked Pseudo Mailed schrieb:
> no its still not responding to remailer-key
Echolot thesauri around the world indicate otherwise. Maybe the mail path
to you is frelled. Does your mail provider use DUL blocklists or other
no-fly lists? If you'd tell me the sender address that you use, I could
send a remailer-key request myself and see where the response leaves to.
Frell Remailer Admins, wishing the other part of this thread would leave
the word 'frell' out of the subject. Private Echelon keeps ringing.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRkoT/2aR/ww89Cq9AQIRWQf7BKXvLzlS78ObqpeMxH2xneJgRFourGKU
NeUvB0T5r1gtm/NmUPzHzJebz8THf21J4m6q8MjTUTQNYZ2M8qc2HAnQkddnoiRt
SOGW1LwyLG4Gw733q/zqsXFEdsqjojHfjEQAtNYcy5GLdS045j0YnZF9x8z7qbRw
FlrUDkGvz3rBC+1V4Vjw/cZTF/sIlNbGegXcBZs7yJLjBrPpsSiiWpmMxe65zysw
UUQC+49qCgbTXLjNN/rRNotHO6qJWT1bEBdCCoB6ybdVBveMjXbfWtZv6OqPS5VT
CHAn4OHXLkJWURPgF5+UIhSlKk+7Lmc2k9TKtwq4aMaDyVbPAFIj7A==
=rZCe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In article <e617428a7fdfecbe...@pseudo.borked.net>
I don't know where you come from, but we actually have toilets for that
in Holland. Works swell once you can reach the pulley.
Also. My shoes are made with Gore-Tex. So all moist stays on the
outside. They might be a bit expensive for you but I sure do love mine.
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRktAogEP2l8iXKAJAQG0bgMcDW614t6bwGmmTENRZgF43wQ9QQaNnLRe
7NbKjuIgHwB0LMeMmr4MWd4yJVwZMev7OSowwCGQCLJMt93As90fIV0adX4WWlDg
hwj46jQ+sSBQBM8pxBe17D3Gs5AwelM3XJj3/A==
=5Yaw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yes. We have some pretty disgusting trivialities going on in this
newsgroup :-( Maybe Frog-Admin can get that moderated newsgroup together
that he seemed to long for so much. Moderation is JOY!
Thomas
> > You two really are more alike than you are different. If Eelbash
> > would finally come out of the closet and admit he's a medically
> > diagnosed fruitcake we couldn't tell you two apart at all. Neither
> > one of you could poor you own piss out of your shoes if we wrote
> > instructions on the heels, and you'd both use the excuse that you
> > liked wet feet when people asked you why you smell like piss.
>
> I don't know where you come from, but we actually have toilets for
> that in Holland. Works swell once you can reach the pulley.
Be sure to go public when you've conquered that barrier, too.
> Also. My shoes are made with Gore-Tex. So all moist stays on the
> outside. They might be a bit expensive for you but I sure do love mine.
I wear Vasque Sundowners most of the time. Look them up. You couldn't
afford them along side your our taxpayer funded video games because
even so called enlightened societal structures know useless assholes
like you don't deserve that standard of living. Fact is, you own no
such thing for two reasons. You're a bloodsucker who doesn't rate
them of course, and you don't spend enough time standing upright to
warrant owning shoes in the first place.
It's obvious someone struck a nerve, you actually do realize how much
alike you and eelbash are, and you're lying your ass off trying to
win back a bit of the dignity you never had.
Sorry it didn't work out. ;)
Oh my! Vasque Sundowners! Yeah, they would hold my piss much better than
my current shoes. I can see why you like them so much. If only I had a
pair of those! Pissing would never be the same.
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRk3JKgEP2l8iXKAJAQFrlgMfRYwrUOLY/DWs09achC0KpnW+2UEwBLoR
qIf4XgtW03q4l+bC9+whKieqqbeXwP8UtZpNzjYInOJP3CSRcRT6TpjoNJlfpeoZ
nWPxenB+i81sfcyF3gqdzLW55Llbdl+42JHG0Q==
=UKJx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<waste of time, not even amusing>
Yes folks, here we are once again after a couple rounds of whack-a-tard
watching Son Of Eel desperately grasp for some bit of wit with which to
redeem itself in its own eyes.
Boschloony, you're pathetic.
So the poster's right, you DO piss in your shoes.
No so much a surprise as I though it would be actually. <shrug>
> Oh my! Vasque Sundowners! Yeah, they would hold my piss much better than
> my current shoes. I can see why you like them so much. If only I had a
> pair of those! Pissing would never be the same.
So then the toilet thing was just something you've heard about?
LOL!!
Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>> Thomas J. Boschloony wrote:
[snip]
>> Oh my! Vasque Sundowners! Yeah, they would hold my piss much better
>> than my current shoes. I can see why you like them so much. If only I
>> had a pair of those! Pissing would never be the same.
>
> So the poster's right, you DO piss in your shoes.
If I had Vasque Sundowners I would actually.
> No so much a surprise as I though it would be actually. <shrug>
Sheep are surprised by the simplest of things. You will get surprised by
a lot of other things during your life as a sheep.
Just stay the hell away from BBQs!
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRlL9TgEP2l8iXKAJAQECWgMfW/fjWHE48Rrr+XSjf2XLmGZr59JtuGRd
9xWfMqc4RllsyohB1dGFPk1oQ+ROo2OIuBjjGnpQIZSjARxtQYoumxh/Tggsz532
IEGqdyM7cyauSlG3DO2DarW51HUhHBJHRY2Aww==
=J+L3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
So you think they actually must exist? There must be some hope left for you!
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRlL9nQEP2l8iXKAJAQGeKgMgpm1va8btYvcagcxGtFPc/Sbhg1oYunsN
40ITqw5fMoVlzoyrP+8arQ0I9kv2rDKhs7izIBxfAGswussFrwDBIgUYrHKCkxxt
ocZKl0faAw0DMW6otTXtTerYp6n7GxjhaMn0zA==
=bqs2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> George Orwell wrote:
> > "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> Oh my! Vasque Sundowners! Yeah, they would hold my piss much better than
> >> my current shoes. I can see why you like them so much. If only I had a
> >> pair of those! Pissing would never be the same.
> >
> > So then the toilet thing was just something you've heard about?
> >
> > LOL!!
>
> So you think they actually must exist? There must be some hope left for you!
WTF are you babbling about now Bosch-a-loon? You're making even less
sense than usual.
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> > George Orwell wrote:
> > > "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Oh my! Vasque Sundowners! Yeah, they would hold my piss much
> > >> better than my current shoes. I can see why you like them so
> > >> much. If only I had a pair of those! Pissing would never be the
> > >> same.
> > >
> > > So then the toilet thing was just something you've heard about?
> > >
> > > LOL!!
> >
> > So you think they actually must exist? There must be some hope left
> > for you!
>
> WTF are you babbling about now Bosch-a-loon? You're making even less
> sense than usual.
Why, he's trying to explain how much nicer it would be to pee on
himself if he were wearing expensive footwear than it is now, with
standard issue welfare bum shoes he hardly ever uses for anything BUT
failed attempts to keep his own urine off the floor.
I'd pretty much call that business as usual to be honest. Maybe a bit
more disgusting than your typical Boschaloon nonsense (fists up his ass
aside of course), but certainly not any more or less useful than
anything else the lazy bastard has ever contributed to "society".
Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
>> George Orwell wrote:
>>> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh my! Vasque Sundowners! Yeah, they would hold my piss much better than
>>>> my current shoes. I can see why you like them so much. If only I had a
>>>> pair of those! Pissing would never be the same.
>>> So then the toilet thing was just something you've heard about?
>>>
>>> LOL!!
>> So you think they actually must exist? There must be some hope left for you!
>>
> WTF are you babbling about now Bosch-a-loon? You're making even less
> sense than usual.
Do you believe in the existence of toilets?
Would you use one now we have established that you can afford vasque
sundowners? It must be very tempting for you not to use the toilet :-/ I
myself would piss my shoes if I had vasque sundowners!
Thomas
- --
You crawl before you walk
You run before you leap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRlviBwEP2l8iXKAJAQG8mQMfUHF7ZKIeniQO5grHyMVzrI9EYPGQeGgf
ADR8q0l7WxAOvnMPN8U/yi5EHrvxEDNv9gQx4fwP9exNL9iYUfV6bzXFZXGU8bRb
ZW3OemaBmERmH8YY/mzRcxR0o3irGqxRytqAzg==
=5Id9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
And which of them kill headers like From:,Subject: and In-Reply-
To:?
Thanks for answering.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 04:04:12 -0600 (MDT), Julius Caesar wrote in
Message-Id: <95731a802d9b010a...@pseudo.borked.net>:
> Is there a list of gateways, which are reliable and usable without any
> tokens? I imagine a list like rlist.txt...
Check out http://www.cotse.net/users/drsnoid/results.htm
> And which of them kill headers like From:,Subject: and In-Reply-To:?
Here's the specific config line from the m2n.mixmin.net gateway:
bin_headers = ['To', 'Return-Path', 'Received', 'X-Original-To',
'Delivered-To', 'Content-Length', 'Lines', 'Xref', 'NNTP-Posting-Host',
'X-Spam-Checker-Version', 'X-Spam-Level', 'X-Spam-Status',
'X-Spambayes-Classification']
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGZpFTlKZ6CY7Vd0MRCtHDAKC8jmPNN7nCYCYZHnAhB4AZvLbH7wCgvO7U
UCmHVv6PzEDsglxpE7RUbWw=
=emVf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
On 16 May 2007 13:13:41 +0200, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote in
Message-Id: <dfa3f7e61f22b97d...@remailer.cyberiade.it>:
> Cool, shame about the IP in the X-Trace header though :(
I've changed this now. The X-Trace header is deleted prior to posting.
Posting is still only permitted from SSL connections.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFGaSjqlKZ6CY7Vd0MRCp6mAKDF6qz+BgSJ6PnViG8vbDiBItwewACYrRbj
rXKMiPdXADDXOqS+8gl0KA==
=zLe6