Re: nymservers
Zax
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:00:58 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote in
Message-Id: <c21d53683351cef3...@dizum.com>:
> I guess my nyms at nymu bit the dust.
I think so. Not sure what happened to that one. The associated
remailer died at the end of July.
> What nymservers are active now.
Currently I think nym.mixmin.net is the only one running.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAkrgD8oACgkQlKZ6CY7Vd0M/IQCgs62YnbDjicboWdSIOMjTtyGP
UWQAnR6kRdXUM3b45/KSyYCJp7dZUOrc
=PEN3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
Jens Kubieziel
> Currently I think nym.mixmin.net is the only one running.
Hmm ...
# dig nym.mixmin.net
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> nym.mixmin.net
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37490
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;nym.mixmin.net. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
mixmin.net. 2093 IN SOA fleegle.mixmin.net. admin.mixmin.net. 2009080303 7200 7200 1814400 43200
;; Query time: 45 msec
;; SERVER: 12.1.2.81#53(12.1.2.81)
;; WHEN: Thu Oct 22 10:50:30 2009
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 82
--
Jens Kubieziel http://www.kubieziel.de
FdI#145: Heavysidesche Sprungfunktion
Lernkurve eines Informatikers, der in einem Unternehmen mit FDDI Backbone
einen FI Schütz eingebaut hat. (Detlef Bosau)
Zax
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:53:14 +0200, Jens Kubieziel wrote in
Message-Id: <slrnhe07bq...@usenet.kubieziel.de>:
> * Zax schrieb am 2009-10-22:
>> Currently I think nym.mixmin.net is the only one running.
>
> Hmm ...
>
> # dig nym.mixmin.net
> ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> nym.mixmin.net
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37490
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;nym.mixmin.net. IN A
nym.mixmin.net is only used for email. Hence:-
$ dig nym.mixmin.net mx
; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P1 <<>> nym.mixmin.net mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50739
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 4
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;nym.mixmin.net. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
nym.mixmin.net. 86400 IN MX 10 fleegle.mixmin.net.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAkrgIOIACgkQlKZ6CY7Vd0OkUwCfUJdkc9UNEUTrT0WBr4oCDRBd
CQAAoKpB0CdRJ/7mP6ivZbOuM2s5lkGL
=GxDM
nymtst
>On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:00:58 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote in
>Message-Id: <c21d53683351cef3...@dizum.com>:
>
>> I guess my nyms at nymu bit the dust.
>I think so. Not sure what happened to that one. The associated
>remailer died at the end of July.
>
>> What nymservers are active now.
>Currently I think nym.mixmin.net is the only one running.
Indeed, nymu has bitten the dust, however, reports of the death of
nym.gabrix.ath.cx are greatly exaggerated.
Both send and receive are working for me. Has anyone had problems?
nymtst
Spook
Hash: SHA1
"nymtst" <rema...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:NL6D0UA84012...@reece.net.au...
I have had success using mixmin.net but no success with gabrix. I use
Quicksilver to generate the requests.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSvocvXZBGilJ9nvYEQKefACgoAvmU20E+Z2tEvTpGbEk5Is3uOEAn1ES
iUSJelTOB+3KFrxO5W1RXfE/
=Dja9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Dave U. Random
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>"nymtst" <rema...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
>news:NL6D0UA84012...@reece.net.au...
>> Zax wrote:
>>>On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:00:58 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote in
>>>Message-Id: <c21d53683351cef3...@dizum.com>:
>>>
>>>> I guess my nyms at nymu bit the dust.
>>>I think so. Not sure what happened to that one. The associated
>>>remailer died at the end of July.
>>>
>>>> What nymservers are active now.
>>>Currently I think nym.mixmin.net is the only one running.
>>
>> Indeed, nymu has bitten the dust, however, reports of the death of
>> nym.gabrix.ath.cx are greatly exaggerated.
>>
>> Both send and receive are working for me. Has anyone had problems?
>>
>> nymtst
>>
>
>I have had success using mixmin.net but no success with gabrix. I use
>Quicksilver to generate the requests.
>
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<li...@nym.gabrix.ath.cx>: connect to nym.gabrix.ath.cx[79.42.24.196]:25:
Connection timed out
If you can't get a list I don't see much hope in making a nym.
.
Spook
Hash: SHA1
"Dave U. Random" <anon...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote in message
news:fcaee88bc2f43f8f...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net...
Getting a list from nym.gabrix.ath.ax is not a problem. I get a response back
for the list command within two minutes. I just don't get any replies back
when creating a nym. I don't know what the problem is as I don't have a
problem creating nyms with mixmin.net.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSvtwJHZBGilJ9nvYEQJMvwCgmfLG4od/KkOqRml2q747UsgSUN4An0OB
2HiwIArLOw96OuycyprGNi4g
=6DPk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
nymtst
Hash: SHA1
I have successfully gotten a list of used nyms emailed to me as well,
so that appears to be working. In a few days I will report on the
status of a request for a new nym. The large latency is a
consequence/feature of sending through mixmaster.
nymtst
nymtst
>
>list at nym.gabrix.ath.cx gives nothing back.
I used the following message (cut-and-pasted to preclude a typo)
******
To: li...@nym.gabrix.ath.cx
Subject: list
list
******
And this is cut from the tail of the list message that I received:
> To: li...@nym.gabrix.ath.cx
> Subject: list
> Message-Id: <200911130812...@smtp.gabrix.ath.cx>
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:12:41 +0100 (CET)
On the nym creation issue, I have received a confirmation request
for the new nym, so that seems to be working as well.
nymtst
nymtst
>
>On 14 Nov 2009 21:29:23 -0000, nymtst <rema...@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
<snip>
>>
>>I used the following message (cut-and-pasted to preclude a typo)
>>
>>******
>>
>>To: li...@nym.gabrix.ath.cx
>>Subject: list
>>
>>list
>>
>>******
>
>ok so it needs subject:list and list in the body.
I had the same thought, but it turns out that that was just what I
made up to put in, apparently. Since I could not remember, I tried a
test request message with:
************************
To: li...@nym.gabrix.ath.cx
Subject: subject
body
********************
The list came back, with
> To: li...@nym.gabrix.ath.cx
> Subject: subject
> Message-Id: <200911152116...@smtp.gabrix.ath.cx>
> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:16:37 +0100 (CET)
at the end of the list, to prove that the reply was not just a
straggler from my earlier list request. So you can use any subject
and any body, only the list address matters (and your return address,
of course).
>>On the nym creation issue, I have received a confirmation request
>>for the new nym, so that seems to be working as well.
>>
>>nymtst
>
>great news. i'll try again.
The confirmation from the confirmation has arrived, and the new nym is
indeed fully up. It is also on the list of used nyms now as well, as a
further confirmation of success.
I now have my own problem with gabrix's m2n, but that is for another thread.
nymtst