Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ping Zax - Relay Access Denied

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 6:54:10 AM11/23/09
to

Hello Zax,

would you please add the "who" remailer to your SMTP relay list?

| SMTP State: Sending chunk 1 of 8 from 'Anon <anon<at>domain.invalid>' to 'remailer<at>tioat.net', server 'snorky.mixmin.net', port 2525 ...
| SMTP Error: <remailer<at>tioat.net>: Relay access denied: 250 - Ok

BTW, why don't you run a program to build that list from the
pubring.mix file?

| who remailer<at>tioat.net c6624503110b63e70ee31e1a8985e0bb 2:3.1-alpha1 MCNm 2009-10-07 2010-11-01

Thanks
.

Zax

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:33:47 AM11/23/09
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:10 +0100 (CET), Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote in
Message-Id: <68a07b07f5398d03...@remailer.privacy.at>:

> would you please add the "who" remailer to your SMTP relay list?

No problem, it's done.

> BTW, why don't you run a program to build that list from the
> pubring.mix file?

It's on my TODO list. :)

It's not straight forward as the recipient_access file it writes for
Postfix contains unrelated entries. I need to parse the file and add
new remailer addresses rather than just overwriting it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREKAAYFAksKnUsACgkQlKZ6CY7Vd0NyiQCdEZOdy7w5vGLPosYlVOObAEda
6U4An15GRvFH1WGxEOqAM1OYntNVCaBQ
=bIze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 1:43:55 PM11/23/09
to

Zax wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:10 +0100 (CET), Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote in
> Message-Id: <68a07b07f5398d03...@remailer.privacy.at>:
>
> > would you please add the "who" remailer to your SMTP relay list?
> No problem, it's done.

Thanks again!

> > BTW, why don't you run a program to build that list from the
> > pubring.mix file?
> It's on my TODO list. :)
>
> It's not straight forward as the recipient_access file it writes for
> Postfix contains unrelated entries. I need to parse the file and add
> new remailer addresses rather than just overwriting it.

Sounds complicated, I wish you much luck.

Bye
.

Non scrivetemi

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 5:43:14 PM11/23/09
to
In article <68a07b07f5398d03...@remailer.privacy.at>

Yo!!! Wake up! The who remailer is closed! Don't know why you'd want to
send mail to it.
Message-ID: <he4ev8$mi5$1...@tioat.net>


who

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:32:32 PM11/23/09
to

Yep that won't work. Only the m2n is running now.

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 11:26:32 PM11/23/09
to

"Non scrivetemi" wrote:

> Yo!!! Wake up! The who remailer is closed! Don't know why you'd want to
> send mail to it.
> Message-ID: <he4ev8$mi5$1...@tioat.net>

It's still listed in the stats files and thereby used by OmniMix. And
when trying to send e. g. 6 copies / packets to the snorky host with a
non-relayed remailer<at>tioat.net in the second position, which aborts
the whole transfer returning an error to the mail client, you have to
throw dice whether a) to count on the single already transmitted copy
making it, b) to have another go but risk a double posting or c) to
wait for hours before, if necessary, trying it once more. OTOH, with
enough copies reliably sent it's of minor importance whether the tioat
message itself gets lost or not, the remaining packets will guarantee
success.
.

who

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 12:21:05 AM11/24/09
to
Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
> It's still listed in the stats files and thereby used by OmniMix. And
> when trying to send e. g. 6 copies / packets to the snorky host with a
> non-relayed remailer<at>tioat.net in the second position, which aborts
> the whole transfer returning an error to the mail client, you have to
> throw dice whether a) to count on the single already transmitted copy
> making it, b) to have another go but risk a double posting or c) to
> wait for hours before, if necessary, trying it once more. OTOH, with
> enough copies reliably sent it's of minor importance whether the tioat
> message itself gets lost or not, the remaining packets will guarantee
> success.

Some of the stats sites have already dropped who and the ones that
still list show under 50 percent for reliablilty. With mixmaster
there is a config setting for minimum reliability and another for
minimum on the final; does OmniMix have settings for those?

Message has been deleted

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:50:03 AM11/24/09
to

who wrote:

> Some of the stats sites have already dropped who and the ones that
> still list show under 50 percent for reliablilty. With mixmaster
> there is a config setting for minimum reliability and another for
> minimum on the final; does OmniMix have settings for those?

It does. At the "State Int" tab below the Mixmaster executable path
there are input fields for Reliab min / fin / Latency / Distance. Or
you add the "who" remailer to the Starex list (also at "State Int").

BTW, where do those trailing dots in my austria postings come from?
.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages