Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dyndns blacklisted domains postfix relayhost

15 views
Skip to first unread message

Null

unread,
Dec 1, 2008, 2:00:21 AM12/1/08
to
Dyndns domains and as well as no-ip are blacklisted by all mainstream
email providers as hotmail , gmail , yahoo etc.
Gmail does give to its registered users the chance to use smtp.gmail.com
as postfix relayhost .
Let's say i want to run a remailer , i would give to Big G the chance to
register mixmaster remailer smtp traffic , which it's not a big deal for
anonymous remailers , isn' it ?
How does a mixmaster remailer deal with this issue ?
Most of the anonymous type 2 remailers are first level domains like .net
, .de , .com , .to , .at .
Is any chance for dynamic domains to see their mail delivered everywhere?

Would be a solution split smtp traffic into ordinary mail going through
smtp.gmail.com on one hand and on the other one have remailer traffic
working on its own ?

How can i use mixmaster as relayhost for itself ?
If i add a mixmaster voice to master.cf how could i use it ?
And if i hated big G where could i find an smtp ssl/tls relayhost ?

I will really appreciate an help on this , thanks !!!

Gab

--
FINGERPRINT: 9FB9 3120 18AC 1398 DC72 A0BC E376 FE1E 4D28 064B
pub 1024D/4D28064B 2008-10-19
uid NoAuth Admin (RISEUP.NET) <noau...@riseup.net>

Null

unread,
Dec 1, 2008, 4:06:06 AM12/1/08
to
Null wrote:
> Dyndns domains and as well as no-ip are blacklisted by all mainstream
> email providers as hotmail , gmail , yahoo etc.
> Gmail does give to its registered users the chance to use smtp.gmail.com
> as postfix relayhost .
> Let's say i want to run a remailer , i would give to Big G the chance to
> register mixmaster remailer smtp traffic , which it's not a big deal for
> anonymous remailers , isn' it ?
> How does a mixmaster remailer deal with this issue ?
> Most of the anonymous type 2 remailers are first level domains like .net
> , .de , .com , .to , .at .
> Is any chance for dynamic domains to see their mail delivered everywhere?
>
> Would be a solution split smtp traffic into ordinary mail going through
> smtp.gmail.com on one hand and on the other one have remailer traffic
> working on its own ?
>
> How can i use mixmaster as relayhost for itself ?
> If i add a mixmaster voice to master.cf how could i use it ?
> And if i hated big G where could i find an smtp ssl/tls relayhost ?
>
> I will really appreciate an help on this , thanks !!!
>
> Gab
>
Ok let's say i was pissed when i wrote the above mail ....
I have a dyndns domain name which is blacklisted by major mail
providers ... i need a smtp relay host not in those blacklists and not
being smtp.gmail.com , possibly some safe email provider looking after
users privacy and using ssl/tls ... thanks !
Message has been deleted

Anonymous Remailer

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 1:01:07 PM12/3/08
to
> As to the dyndns domain being blacklisted, perhaps. But your dynamic
> IP address itself will be blacklisted by far more.
>
> I guess you are unwilling to use your ISP's mail server and that put
> you onto gmail?
>
> There are some commercial (pay for) email solutions out there that
> might accommodate you to start. But if your remailer is abused, and I
> have a hard time imagining it won't be - they all are to some degree,
> then complaints will arrive. And your new host will make suggestions,
> that if ignored, will result in being thrown off.
>
> pobox.com is one, but there are many others. And they all have some
> limits on the volume they will take for a price.
>
>
> What you really want is what is known in the biz as "bullet proof
> hosting." But it'll cost too, and could also be blacklisted.

Have the remops not been able to come up with anything to stop
spammer abuse? I know they tried HashCash, but they seem to have
abandoned that now.


Anonymous Remailer

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 1:06:14 PM12/3/08
to
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:06:06 +0100, Null <no...@fake.null> wrote:
>

Anonymous Remailer

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 1:08:16 PM12/3/08
to
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:06:06 +0100, Null <no...@fake.null> wrote:
>
Message has been deleted
0 new messages