I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2 or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been, Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out there? Thanks.
> Hey Richard:
> I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> there? Thanks.
If you insist on continuing to drive an Edsel (pgp 6.5.8ckt 09), then don't complain about your refusal to drive a free Ferrari (GnuPG). hSub has not replaced eSub. It is a new system that works quite well in place of eSub.
I would give you the instructions on how to set up hSub, but you have already said that you are determined to stubbornly drive your Edsel.
> Hey Richard:
> I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> there? Thanks.
If you insist on continuing to drive an Edsel (pgp 6.5.8ckt 09), then don't complain about your refusal to drive a free Ferrari (GnuPG). hSub has not replaced eSub. It is a new system that works quite well in place of eSub.
> I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> there? Thanks.
Frog, will you shut the fuck up! Your day ended long ago.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:46:17 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote in
Message-Id: <8915a24cc295ca1d909d3e129a42ebdc@remailer.paranoici.org>:
> I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2 > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate > normally, the way that I am use to?
nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to?
> nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
If he can't figure out how to set up mixnym.net hsub, he is going to end up killing himself trying to setup an esub.
> Hey Richard:
> I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> there? Thanks.
This whiner was in here with this same thing a few months back.
>> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
>> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
>> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
>> > normally, the way that I am use to?
>> nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
> If he can't figure out how to set up mixnym.net hsub, he is going >to end up killing himself trying to setup an esub.
It's all about the right tool: Omnimix makes it very easy.
In article <0a68b3baa7aa6ae8abb5604416b28...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Fritz Wuehler <fr...@spamexpire-201209.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
> Hi Zax do I need to put
> ::
> Encrypted: PGP
> on a config request after I do the pgp -seat or do I just send the thing
> encrypted to your nymserver with the usual ------BEGIN PGP header thanks.
I don't know why you were worried about sounding like an ingrate, 'cause you should just accept who you are and learn to live with it. I suppose if fags can do it, you can to. Or you could practice using sneaker net, which still works wonders and has about the same level of performance. Just remember to use a sponge and not your tongue for sticking the stamp.
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> > real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> > the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> > associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> > in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> > do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> > instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> > half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> > use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> > use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> > no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> > render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> > and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> > ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> > that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> > I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> > Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> > there? Thanks.
> This whiner was in here with this same thing a few months back.
If there was a similar post previously, it was not me, I have only just returned to this group after some years off, so am somewhat rusty.
In article <5cf990736da7736d04ff387740d128f3@anonymitaet-im-
inter.net>
Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
> > > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > > normally, the way that I am use to?
> > nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
> If he can't figure out how to set up mixnym.net hsub, he is going
> to end up killing himself trying to setup an esub.
As I said in a previous response above, I did not appreciate that esub and hsub were different. Once irritation and frustration set in and take a firm hold, the most obvious of contrasts can be overlooked.
> In article <8915a24cc295ca1d909d3e129a42e...@remailer.paranoici.org>
> Anonymous <nob...@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
> > Hey Richard:
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> > real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> > the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> > associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> > in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> > do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> > instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> > half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> > use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> > use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> > no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> > render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> > and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> > ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> > that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> > I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> > Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> > there? Thanks.
> Frog, will you shut the fuck up! Your day ended long ago.
I am not frog, altough I do remember the long ongoing controversy years ago.
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:53:14 +0300 (EEST), Anonymous wrote in
Message-Id: <e95cd73db65f0c66044dbfec87f2d00f@foto.ro1.torservers.net>:
> As I said in a previous response above, I did not appreciate > that esub and hsub were different. Once irritation and > frustration set in and take a firm hold, the most obvious of > contrasts can be overlooked.
They aren't really that different, both are methods of encoding the
Subject header so that only the owner knows which are their messages.
Good luck getting your Nym up and running whichever solution you choose
to go with. Feel free to ask for help if it's not working out.
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> > real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> > the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> > associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> > in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> > do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> > instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> > half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> > use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> > use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> > no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> > render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> > and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> > ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> > that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> > I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> > Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> > there? Thanks.
> If you insist on continuing to drive an Edsel (pgp 6.5.8ckt 09),
> then don't complain about your refusal to drive a free Ferrari
> (GnuPG). hSub has not replaced eSub. It is a new system that
> works quite well in place of eSub.
Well, I must admit that in the vortex of my irritation and fatigue, i did not grasp that esub and hsub were different.
Perhaps i should go back and re-visit the whole thing, maybe in a few days.
> In article <8915a24cc295ca1d909d3e129a42e...@remailer.paranoici.org>
> Anonymous <nob...@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
> > Hey Richard:
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> > real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> > the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> > associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> > in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> > do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> > instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> > half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> > use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> > use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> > no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> > render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> > and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> > ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> > that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> > I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> > Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> > there? Thanks.
> Frog, will you shut the fuck up! Your day ended long ago.
I am not frog, altough I do remember the long ongoing controversy years ago.
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> > real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> > the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> > associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> > in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> > do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> > instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> > half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> > use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> > use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> > no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> > render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> > and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> > ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> > that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> > I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> > Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> > there? Thanks.
> If you insist on continuing to drive an Edsel (pgp 6.5.8ckt 09),
> then don't complain about your refusal to drive a free Ferrari
> (GnuPG). hSub has not replaced eSub. It is a new system that
> works quite well in place of eSub.
Well, I must admit that in the vortex of my irritation and fatigue, i did not grasp that esub and hsub were different.
Perhaps i should go back and re-visit the whole thing, maybe in a few days.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:46:17 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote in
> Message-Id: <8915a24cc295ca1d909d3e129a42e...@remailer.paranoici.org>:
> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> > normally, the way that I am use to?
> nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
In article <e59508b02048900a94df4c733fb91...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
> >> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> >> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> >> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> >> > normally, the way that I am use to?
> >> nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
> > If he can't figure out how to set up mixnym.net hsub, he is going
> >to end up killing himself trying to setup an esub.
> It's all about the right tool: Omnimix makes it very easy.
If you don't count the learning curve, right? It took Bubba a month to get out his first remailer message with OM. Does that make it a good remailer client?
Does a good remailer client use mixmaster 2.9 when mixmaster 3 has been around for 3 years? Did you know that mix 2.9 uses an openssl dll from 1999? Does that make a good remailer client?
How about vista/win7 support? People are already using win8. How many years has that been neglected? Hell, it still defaults to the \program files\ directory even though it's incompatible! Is that why you say it's a good remailer client?
OM takes 30 minutes to send a message direct to a remailer! Thirty minutes of repeated connect attempts. Is that good for a remailer client? Thirty minutes? How can any user be satisfied with that? HOW CAN ANY PROGRAMMER BE SATISFIED WITH THAT?
That's some code we'd ought to get a look at :) Of course, we can't. OM is closed source. Does closed source make a good remailer client?
Anonymous wrote:
> In article <e59508b02048900a94df4c733fb91...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
> Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
> > It's all about the right tool: Omnimix makes it very easy.
> If you don't count the learning curve, right? It took Bubba a month > to get out his first remailer message with OM. Does that make it a > good remailer client?
> Does a good remailer client use mixmaster 2.9 when mixmaster 3 has > been around for 3 years? Did you know that mix 2.9 uses an openssl > dll from 1999? Does that make a good remailer client?
> How about vista/win7 support? People are already using win8. How many > years has that been neglected? Hell, it still defaults to the > \program files\ directory even though it's incompatible! Is that why > you say it's a good remailer client?
> OM takes 30 minutes to send a message direct to a remailer! Thirty > minutes of repeated connect attempts. Is that good for a remailer > client? Thirty minutes? How can any user be satisfied with that? HOW > CAN ANY PROGRAMMER BE SATISFIED WITH THAT?
> That's some code we'd ought to get a look at :) Of course, we can't. > OM is closed source. Does closed source make a good remailer client?
A liar's list of untenable assertions.
Though including all necessary components like Tor, Hamster and GPG,
and not having to rely on external tools, OM is set up faster than any
other remailer software. And there are no OS restrictions. It works
with all Windows versions starting with XP.
Preppy, it's not just a good, it's the best remailer client we have!
>In article <e59508b02048900a94df4c733fb91...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
>Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
>> >> > I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
>> >> > servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
>> >> > or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
>> >> > normally, the way that I am use to?
>> >> nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net? Both are traditional nymservers.
>> > If he can't figure out how to set up mixnym.net hsub, he is going
>> >to end up killing himself trying to setup an esub.
>> It's all about the right tool: Omnimix makes it very easy.
>If you don't count the learning curve, right? It took Bubba a month >to get out his first remailer message with OM. Does that make it a >good remailer client?
Yes, of course, at least for those who can read the instructions and
post log excerpts to get their problems solved.
Learn to ride a bike and you no longer have to walk!
Bubba, who never explained why it took so long (he may have a job!),
also thinks so, as on 01/22/2011 he wrote:
: I could not get JBN to work on a new PC running Windows 7 x64 Home Premium,
: "unable to register an .ocx file" or something like that. I even tried
: installing it to the root directory, C:\JBN, and I also tried all of the
: downward compatibility settings in the executable properties, but to no
: avail. I asked about this problem in this group at the time, but no one
: seemed to know of any solution since JBN is long-since abandonware.
: : So I switched to Omnimix, using my favorite old newsreader to post,
: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 (c)2002, and that setup works flawlessly.
: : Omnimix is a really versatile program, but as some have mentioned it is not
: open source. I don't worry about technicalities like that, but rumor has
: it that some people do. All I know is that it's free and it works great.
And on 05/06/2012 he wrote:
: My advice is to use your favorite news reader/emailer with Omnimix
: to post. Works like a charm. No doubt our resident Omnimix-basher
: will pipe in complaining that Omnimix isn't "open source." Most of
: the programs on my computer aren't open source either. Is Windows
: or Microsoft Security Essentials open source, for example?
: : JBN is abandon-ware. Omnimix is frequently updated and is amazingly
: versatile: http://www.danner-net.de/om.htm
>Does a good remailer client use mixmaster 2.9 when mixmaster 3 has >been around for 3 years? Did you know that mix 2.9 uses an openssl >dll from 1999? Does that make a good remailer client?
Does that matter with mixmaster and that openssl dll being used for
nothing but packet creation? You don't know that omnimix uses the
latest openssl 1.0.1 version for ssl/tls connections, do you?
>How about vista/win7 support? People are already using win8. How many >years has that been neglected?
Not by omnimix. In Bubba's "took me a month" article, which you
mentioned above, you also read about him successfully running omnimix
on windows 7 x64 home premium. And I saw it working perfectly with
windows xp, vista and 7, 32 as well as 64 bit, but didn't try windows
8 yet. So don't spread that incompatibility humbug.
> Hell, it still defaults to the >\program files\ directory even though it's incompatible! Is that why >you say it's a good remailer client?
Incompatibility? Here it works from wherever you put it. Omnimix
also was the first fully portable remailer client, leaving no traces
on your host system.
>OM takes 30 minutes to send a message direct to a remailer! Thirty >minutes of repeated connect attempts. Is that good for a remailer >client? Thirty minutes? How can any user be satisfied with that? HOW >CAN ANY PROGRAMMER BE SATISFIED WITH THAT?
Sending through tor usually takes about 45 seconds per packet, which
means less than 6 minutes for a message in 7 copies (about 90 seconds
for message conversion and getting mx server data, followed by 4
minutes for uploading data).
And you must not forget, that it saves you a lot of time during
message creation when using a mail or news client with all the
advantages you're accustomed to (no references header copying, no
message format restrictions, which means full mime support,
attachments, html encoding), compared with the copy & paste sessions
you seem to recommend. Can't speak for the programmer, but I'm
satisfied with that.
>That's some code we'd ought to get a look at :) Of course, we can't. >OM is closed source. Does closed source make a good remailer client?
Mixmaster, the part that creates your packets and thereby makes you
anonymous, is open source. You've read the code or even complied it?
> Bubba, who never explained why it took so long (he may have a job!),
> also thinks so, as on 01/22/2011 he wrote:
> : I could not get JBN to work on a new PC running Windows 7 x64 Home Premium,
> : "unable to register an .ocx file" or something like that. I even tried
> : installing it to the root directory, C:\JBN, and I also tried all of the
> : downward compatibility settings in the executable properties, but to no
> : avail. I asked about this problem in this group at the time, but no one
> : seemed to know of any solution since JBN is long-since abandonware.
> :
> : So I switched to Omnimix, using my favorite old newsreader to post,
> : Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 (c)2002, and that setup works flawlessly.
> :
> : Omnimix is a really versatile program, but as some have mentioned it is not
> : open source. I don't worry about technicalities like that, but rumor has
> : it that some people do. All I know is that it's free and it works great.
So did someone send Bubba his OM Decoder Ring?
> And on 05/06/2012 he wrote:
> : My advice is to use your favorite news reader/emailer with Omnimix
> : to post. Works like a charm. No doubt our resident Omnimix-basher
> : will pipe in complaining that Omnimix isn't "open source." Most of
> : the programs on my computer aren't open source either. Is Windows
> : or Microsoft Security Essentials open source, for example?
Clearly Bubba is none to smart in logic as well as security-ware. Windows and MSE are two of the most scrutinized and widely used programs by many of the best developers around, not to mention the fact that Microsoft would be held accountable and suffer immensely if its product were found to be back-doored and the favorite spyware of MIB.
And since you too are obviously not the sharpest of tools in the shed, as shown by your lack of distinction in these two scenarios and ignorance in using a pitifully poor example to support your lost cause, well I am now wondering why I should bother responding to such a looser.
Perhaps I do it in hopes of helping those who are less discerning and better intentioned than a bloke like you.
> I don't want to sound like an ingrate, but are there any nym
> servers functioning anymore that are compatable with QS 1.2.7.2
> or that can be hand rolled in the typical way and operate
> normally, the way that I am use to? This mixnym.net thing is a
> real pain in the ass the way its hardwired, no clear way to do
> the config message, the aam retrieval software loosly
> associated with it doesn't work right, no way to set up the esub
> in one step, instructions seem to require two config attempts to
> do that, the software to do that doesn't work the way the
> instructions say it should. The whole thing seems to be some
> half-baked bloated cumbersome thing that seems to force one to
> use gnpg instead of pgp, and I don't want to change to that, I
> use 6.5.8ckt 09 and that's what I want to use, period.. I have
> no idea why all of these useless changes have been made but they
> render the thing unnecessairily vague, cumbersome, unreliable
> and useless to me. Did I mention that it is a real pain in the
> ass? The whole thing seems to be a lot of fixes to something
> that was not broken, now its useless. It's got me so pissed off
> I can hardly see straight, what a waste of time its been,
> Christ. Again, are there any normal nym servers functioning out
> there? Thanks.
After you get your nym setup with nymph.paranoici.org or nym.mixmin.net send
me an email and I'll try to walk you through the steps of setting up ESUB
using QS 1.2.7.
